scientific an investigation of the ite formula and its use · this working report is a study of the...

26
Scientific Report AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE CP = t + + Abstract This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval. Its sole purpose is to provide safe passage through an intersection for a wide range of vehicle types and pedestrians with high traffic flow. However, due to misinformation and misunderstandings (both presented and found in the manuals 5 referenced in this report) and lack of knowledge of the ITE formula’s intendant use with the many different State’s vehicles codes, safety is compromised. Proper understanding of the basic laws of physics is needed and the Professional Engineers (PE) that are applying the ITE formula to set the timing of an intersection’s traffic lights are required by law to understand and apply the science to provide public safety. This report is presenting the details of how the ITE formula’s terms are used to calculate the yellow and all‐red phase times for vehicles traveling through an intersection with conflicting traffic and especially how to apply the formula’s clearance term with the two yellow laws; the permissive and restrictive yellow laws. The report includes the needed tools to investigate and illustrate a vehicle in motion. Great effort has been taken to simplify the involved mathematics and physics. All the kinematic formulas are derived from the basic definition of the average velocity and acceleration. The investigation shows the inherent design of the formula and that the critical stopping distance is the source of its design. Given by a vehicle’s speed, a driver’s reaction time and a safe deceleration rate; the critical stopping distance is the only point referenced to an intersection’s entry where a driver can either stop safely before entering or go the critical distance to reach the intersection’s entry point on a legal yellow. However, the design of the formula is not allowing the driver to slow down within the critical stopping distance and enter the intersection. Thus the formula is designed to ONLY accommodate a vehicle stopping before entering or traveling through an intersection at constant or accelerated speed. The next report will cover the yellow phase time required for turns; a time which is greater than calculated by the ITE formula due to a vehicle is slowing down within the critical stopping distance when perform a turning maneuver. Author Mats Järlström [email protected] 503‐671‐0312 Beaverton, Oregon, USA Revision: 14 • September 9, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

ScientificReport

ANINVESTIGATIONOFTHEITEFORMULAANDITSUSE

CP =

t + +

AbstractThisworkingreportisastudyoftheuniversallyadoptedITEformulawhichcalculatesatrafficlight’schangeinterval.Itssolepurposeistoprovidesafepassagethroughanintersectionforawiderangeofvehicletypesandpedestrianswithhightrafficflow.However,duetomisinformationandmisunderstandings(bothpresentedandfoundinthemanuals5referencedinthisreport)andlackofknowledgeoftheITEformula’sintendantusewiththemanydifferentState’svehiclescodes,safetyiscompromised.ProperunderstandingofthebasiclawsofphysicsisneededandtheProfessionalEngineers(PE)thatareapplyingtheITEformulatosetthetimingofanintersection’strafficlightsarerequiredbylawtounderstandandapplythesciencetoprovidepublicsafety.ThisreportispresentingthedetailsofhowtheITEformula’stermsareusedtocalculatetheyellowandall‐redphasetimesforvehiclestravelingthroughanintersectionwithconflictingtrafficandespeciallyhowtoapplytheformula’sclearancetermwiththetwoyellowlaws;thepermissiveandrestrictiveyellowlaws.Thereportincludestheneededtoolstoinvestigateandillustrateavehicleinmotion.Greatefforthasbeentakentosimplifytheinvolvedmathematicsandphysics.Allthekinematicformulasarederivedfromthebasicdefinitionoftheaveragevelocityandacceleration.Theinvestigationshowstheinherentdesignoftheformulaandthatthecriticalstoppingdistanceisthesourceofitsdesign.Givenbyavehicle’sspeed,adriver’sreactiontimeandasafedecelerationrate;thecriticalstoppingdistanceistheonlypointreferencedtoanintersection’sentrywhereadrivercaneitherstopsafelybeforeenteringorgothecriticaldistancetoreachtheintersection’sentrypointonalegalyellow.However,thedesignoftheformulaisnotallowingthedrivertoslowdownwithinthecriticalstoppingdistanceandentertheintersection.ThustheformulaisdesignedtoONLYaccommodateavehiclestoppingbeforeenteringortravelingthroughanintersectionatconstantoracceleratedspeed.Thenextreportwillcovertheyellowphasetimerequiredforturns;atimewhichisgreaterthancalculatedbytheITEformuladuetoavehicleisslowingdownwithinthecriticalstoppingdistancewhenperformaturningmaneuver.AuthorMatsJärlströ[email protected]‐671‐0312Beaverton,Oregon,USARevision:14•September9,2014

Page 2: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page1 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

Tableofcontents Tableofcontents.....................................................................................................................................................................1 1.TheITEformula...................................................................................................................................................................2 

1.1TheITEformula’sthreeterms 2 2.TheusageoftheITEformulaterms............................................................................................................................3 

2.1Theyellowphase 3 2.2Theall‐redphase 3 2.3Thepermissiveyellowlaw 3 2.4Therestrictiveyellowlaw 3 

2.4.1Restrictivelawyellowtrafficlightviolation.........................................................................................3 2.5SummaryoftheITEformulaandthetwoyellowtrafficlightlaws 4 

3.Perceptionandreactiontime........................................................................................................................................5 4.Stoppingandclearancetime..........................................................................................................................................5 5.Kinematics–Thegeometryofavehicleinmotion...............................................................................................6 

5.1Vehiclemotionandthemathematics 6 5.2Motioninputvariables 6 5.3Constantdecelerationoracceleration 6 5.4Constantaccelerationgraphingoptions 7 5.5Thebenefitsofthevelocityversustimegraph 7 

6.Firstmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithaconstantvelocity..............................................................8 7.Secondmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithaconstantacceleration................................................9 8.Thirdmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithastoppingmotion...........................................................10 

8.1Totaltraveleddistancecalculations 10 8.2Stoppingtimecalculations 12 8.3Totalstoppingtimecalculations 12 8.4ComparisontotheITEformula 12 8.5Whythedifference? 13 

9.ITEformulaexampleusingtypicalinputvalues..................................................................................................13 9.1Speedunitconversion 13 9.2Calculationoftheyellowphasetime 13 9.3Preparingtographtheexample 14 9.4Calculationoftotalstoppingtime 14 9.5VerificationoftheITEdecelerationrate 14 9.6Calculationofthetotalstoppingdistance 14 9.7GraphoftheITEformulaexample 15 9.8Grapharea‐distancecalculations 15 9.9Driverdecisionsandoptionalbehavior 16 9.10TheITEformulaexample’sconclusions 16 

10.Fourthmotionexample:Avehiclemakingarighthandturn......................................................................17 11.References.........................................................................................................................................................................18 12.AppendixA‐DefinitionoftheYellowTrafficSignalforVehiclesbyState............................................19 13.AppendixB‐EmergencyStoppingDistancesandTimeCalculations(Rev.10)..................................24 14.AppendixC‐DecelerationRatesandStoppingDistancesComparison(Rev.5).................................25 

ThisreportisdedicatedtoMarianneJärlströmandDavidHodge.

Page 3: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page2

1.TheITEformulaTheInstituteofTransportationEngineers’ITEformulawasdevelopedbyDenosGazisfromGMResearchLabs,RobertHermanandAlexeiMaradudinandpresentedin1959inthepaper“TheProblemoftheAmberSignalLightinTrafficFlow”1.Todaytheformulaisusedworldwidetocalculatetrafficlightphasetimessuchastheyellowchangeandall‐redclearanceintervals.Hereisoneexampleofthisformula12345:

CP =

t +2 2

+ (1.1)

Where:CP = ChangePeriod,totalcombineddriverperceptionandreaction,vehiclestoppingand

clearancetimes,resultexpressedinseconds,(s).t = Perceptionandreactiontimeofthedriver,typically1.0secondsforanexpectedevent,(s).

V = Speedoftheapproachingvehicle,expressedinfeetpersecond,(ft/s).

a = Comfortabledecelerationrateofthevehicle,typically10feetpersecondsquared,(ft/s2).W = Widthoftheintersectionatwidestconflictpoint,expressed infeet,(ft).L = Lengthofvehicle,typically20feet,(ft).G = Accelerationduetogravity,32.2feet persecondsquared,(ft/s2).g = Gradeoftheintersectionapproach,inpercent(%)dividedby100,downhillisnegative

gradeanduphillispositivegrade.1.1TheITEformula’sthreetermsBystudyingtheITEformula(1.1)andtheindividualinputvariables,wecandeterminethatitconsistsofthreetermsandalltermsappeartospecifyorcalculatetimeinsecondsasfollows:

1. Perceptionandreactiontimeof the driver (1.2)

2. Decelerationtimeofthevehicle2 2

(1.3)

3. Intersectionandvehicleclearance time (1.4)

DescribingtheITEformula(1.1)anditsterms,theequationissimplifiedasfollows:

CP =

t +2 2

+

or

ChangePeriod = Perception

ReactionTime

+ DecelerationTime + Intersection&Vehicle

ClearanceTime

or

ChangePeriod = TotalStoppingTime + ClearanceTime

Page 4: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page3 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

2.TheusageoftheITEformulatermsThissectionexplainshowthethreeITEformulatermsarecurrentlyused2toimplementthetimingoftrafficlightswithdifferentState’svehiclecodes5presentedinAPPENDIXA.2.1TheyellowphaseThedriverperceptionandreactiontime(1.2)andthedecelerationtime(1.3)termsaretypicallycombinedtocalculateatrafficlight’syellowphasetimewhichisalsothetotalstoppingtimeoftheITEformula.Thistotalstoppingtimeisalsodirectlylinkedtothe“onesafestoppingdistance”orGazis’“criticalstoppingdistance”whichwillbefurtherinvestigatedlaterinthisreport.2.2Theall‐redphaseTheremainingterm,theintersectionandvehicleclearancetime(1.4),iscommonlyusedtocalculatetrafficlightall‐redphasetimes.Theall‐redphaseisaclearancetimewhenalltrafficlightsareredandnovehiclesareallowedtoentertheintersectionfromanyofitsapproaches.Theall‐redphasetimeallowvehiclesthatarestillintheintersectiontoexitbeforeconflictingtraffic,includingpedestriansthataregivenagreenlighttoenter.Theclearancetermaddsanimportantsafetytimetoavoidtrafficaccidents.2.3ThepermissiveyellowlawThepermissiveyellowlightlawiswhenaState’svehiclecodeonlywarnsthatachangeofthetrafficlightfromyellowtoredisimminentandistherebypermittingadrivertoentertheintersectionduringthefullyellowphase.Forthislaw,theall‐redphaseismandatorysinceavehiclecanlegallyentertheintersectionattheveryendoftheyellowphaseandthusneedstimetodrivethroughandexittheintersectionduringtheprotectionoftheall‐redphase.Aviolationoccursifthedriverenterstheintersectiononaredtrafficlightsignal.2.4TherestrictiveyellowlawThereisalsoarestrictiveyellowlightlawwhereadriverfacingayellowlight“shallstop”andnotentertheintersectionunlessthedriver“cannotstopinsafety”.Adrivercannotstopinsafetyifthedriverisclosertotheintersectionthan“onesafestoppingdistance”orthe“criticalstoppingdistance”.SomeState’srestrictiveyellowlightvehiclecodesalsoaddinstructionsforadriver’soptionalbehaviorwhenfacingtheyellowlightsuchas“ifadrivercannotstopinsafety,thedrivermaycautiouslydrivethroughtheintersection”.Here,the“drivethroughtheintersection”istheITEformula’sclearanceterm(1.4)whichforarestrictiveyellowlightlawisaddedtothetrafficlight’syellowphasetime.Inaddition,theword“cautiously”isinstructingthedrivernottoacceleratetoreachandcleartheintersection’sexit.Anyunsafeaccelerationwouldalsoviolatethespeedlimitifthedriverapproachedtheintersectionatthespeedlimit.Fortherestrictiveyellowlightlawtheall‐redphaseisoptionalsincetheclearancetimeisalreadyincludedintheyellowphasetime.2.4.1RestrictivelawyellowtrafficlightviolationAjurisdictionhavingtherestrictiveyellowlightvehiclecodecanciteadriverrunningayellowlightbecausetheyellowphasetimeincludestheclearanceterm(1.4)andisthereforelongerthanjusttheITEformula’stotalstoppingtime.Thewords“shallstop”usedbytherestrictiveyellowlawisspecificallyaddedtoprohibitorrestrictthedrivertousetheaddedclearancetimetoenterthe

Page 5: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page4

intersection.Thusacitationcanbeissuedifthedriverenterstheintersectionduringtheaddedyellowclearancetime.(Seealsothemarked“ViolationArea”infigure1).2.5SummaryoftheITEformulaandthetwoyellowtrafficlightlawsTosummarizetheITEformula’stermsandtheirusagewiththepermissiveandtherestrictiveyellowlightlawswehave:

ThePermissiveYellowLawWherethedriverispermittedtoentertheintersectionduringthefullyellowphase.

2 2

“TotalStopping” “Clearance”

TheRestrictiveYellowLawWherethe“drivershallstopfacingthelight”duetotheclearancetimeisaddedtotheyellowphase.

2 2

“TotalStopping+Clearance"

Thebelowfigure1illustratestheITEformulatermsandthetwoyellowtrafficlightlawsinascaledintersectionshowingrelativetrafficlightphasetimesforaconstantvelocityvehicle.Thetiminggraphsofthetrafficlightsalsoshowhowtheall‐redphaserelatestotheconflictingtrafficsignalandwhenatrafficlightviolationoccurswiththetwodifferentlaws:

Crosswalk

RESTRICTIVEYellowLaw

PERMISSIVEYellowLaw

ConflictingTrafficSignal

t V2a+2Gg

W+LV

ConstantVehicleVelocity,V

Car&PedestrianConflictingTraffic

+ +

CAR CARCAR

Fig.1‐TheITEFormulaRelativeaTrafficLightIntersectionandtheTwoYellowLightLaws

All‐RedPhase

CAR

TRAFFICSIGNALS:

Entry

PedestrianPath

Time,t

CP=

ClearanceTime

"OneSafeStoppingDistance"

"OneSafeStoppingDistance"

ClearanceTime

ClearanceTime

Confli ct ingCar

&

Perception

Reaction

"Critical

Stopping

Distance"

Exit

Clearance

ViolationArea

Page 6: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page5 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

3.Perceptionandreactiontime Driverperceptionandreactiontime67isatimewherenochangesaretakingplacetoavehicle’smotion.Thisisduetoittakesadriversometimetoperceiveandreactto,forexampleatrafficsignalchangingfromgreentoyellowandtomakeadecisionwhetherheorsheshouldmakeanychangessuchasstoporgo.Thetimeittakescanbebrokendownintothreecategoriesdependingonwhattypeofeventthedriverisreactingtoorismaking.ThreelowcomplexitytypeofeventsandsometypicalperceptionandreactiontimesusedbyITEwithexamplesareasfollows:

1. Unexpectedexternalevent: 2.5seconds‐Adeerenteringtheroadway.

2. Expectedexternalevent: 1.0seconds‐Achangingtrafficlightortrafficcontroldevice.

3. Plannedinternalevent*: 0.0seconds‐Adriverismakingalanechangeoraturn.

*Eventintroducedbyauthor.Note:Atrafficlightisconsideredanexpectedeventbutanincorrectlytimedtrafficlightintersectioncancauseunexpectedeventssuchaspedestrianorvehicleinterferences.Inaddition,differentvehiclebrakingsystemssuchastractor‐trailer,schoolandpublicbusairbrakeswilladdanextrareactiontimedelayof0.5secondsormore8.4.StoppingandclearancetimeBystudyingthestoppingandclearancetermsoftheITEformula,weseethefollowinginputvariables;vehiclelength,vehiclespeedandvehicledeceleration,plusintersectiongradeandintersectionclearancewidth.Distance,velocityandaccelerationcanbepresentedingraphformtohelpusvisualizeandinvestigatethetruephysicalnatureoftheITEformula.Thenextstepistointroducevisualtoolssuchasvehiclemotiongraphs.Note:Sincethisisworkingreport,nextversionwillincludedmoredetailedstudiesoftheindividualinputvariablesofITEformulainthissection.AppendixBandCareincludedatthistimewhichpresentsomeofthisinformation:AppendixBispresentingtheeffectsofdifferentstoppingdistancesbasedonmaximumroadwayfriction(emergencystopping)67andairbrakedelaysneededbytrucks,publicandschoolbusses8.AppendixCispresentingacollectionofmaximumdecelerationsratesfordifferentvehicletypesandalsotheir“cargo”whichincludesbuspassengersandtherelatedstoppingdistances.

Page 7: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page6

5.Kinematics–ThegeometryofavehicleinmotionThegoalistoinvestigatetheITEformulaandhowitrelatestoavehicle’smotionintimeandspacebyusingbasicmathematicsandalsopresentitsmotionusingvisualgraphingtools.5.1VehiclemotionandthemathematicsAvehiclehasthreetight‐coupledvariablesofmotion;distance(d),velocity(V)andacceleration(a).Thebelowflowdiagraminfigure2illustratesthesestatesofmotionandhowtheyarelinkedthroughmathematicalcalculusfunctionswhicharecalleddifferentiationandintegration.Differentiationislookingataplottedcurve’sslopeandintegrationislookingattheareaunderaplottedcurve.However,thisdocumentisgoingtopresentasimplifiedmethodtouse“calculus”toanalyzetheITEformulabyavoidingadvancedmathematicsoncurves.

Integration(Area)

∆∆

∆∆

Differentiation (Slope)

Fig.2‐FlowDiagramofMotionoverTimeandtheirMathematicalRelationships

Figure2presentsthatthethreevariablesofmotionarecloselyconnectedthroughmathematics.Wecanmathematicallyconvert,forexample,accelerationtovelocitybyintegratingaccelerationoverelapsedtime(Δt),(thesymbol“Δ”represents“change”).Wecanalsoconvertdistanceovertimetovelocitybyusingdifferentiation.Usingwords,wecanalsodescribedifferentiationandhowitrelatestoadriverofavehicle:Thevehicle’svelocityisthefirstderivativeofthedistance.Steppingontheacceleratororthebrake,weexperienceasecondderivative‐accelerationordeceleration.5.2MotioninputvariablesWearefamiliarwithbothdistanceandvelocitysincemostvehiclesareequippedwithbothanodometerfordistanceandaspeedometerforspeed.Typicallywehavenostandard“meter”installedinourcarstomeasureacceleration,eventhough“g‐meters”arepopularasanaccessoryforperformancecarenthusiasts.IntheUnitedStates,vehicleodometersmeasuredistanceinmilesandthespeedometersmeasurevelocityinmilesperhour(mph).Asadriver,wecontinuouslymonitortheinstantaneousvehiclespeed(V),ifnot,wemightgetaspeedingcitation.5.3ConstantdecelerationoraccelerationTheITEformulaisusingvehiclevelocity(V)asoneimportantinputvariable.Theformulaisalsoincludingaconstantdecelerationrate(a)definedwithatypicalvalueof10ft/s2.Thisconstantdecelerationrate(a)istellingushowfastavehicleisslowingorisabletoslowdownorstop.OneimportantfactortounderstandisthattheITEformula’saveragedecelerationrateisaconstantrateorvalueovertimeandcaneasilybeplottedinagraph.

Velocity,VDistance,d Acceleration,a

Page 8: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page7 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

5.4ConstantaccelerationgraphingoptionsLetuslookatthegraphingoptionsbasedonanaverageconstantacceleration(a)andseehowthecloselyrelatedvelocity(V)anddistance(d)arevisuallypresentedversustime.

Slope=Velocity

0

Distance

0

Fig.3‐GraphingOptionsforMotionwithConstantAcceleration

ftVelocity

Time

ft/sAcceleration

Time

ft/s2

0 0

aV

Time

t s

d

0 t s 0 t s

ConstantAcceleration

Cons

tnat

Acceleration

ConstantAcceleration

Area=Velocity

Area=DistanceSlope=Acceleration

(Area)

(Slope)

Integration

Differentiation

(Area)

(Slope)

Integration

Differentiation

A B C

Figure3showshowtheaverageconstantacceleration(a)isplottedusingthethreevariablesofmotionversustime.Studyingtheabovegraphsinfigure3A,BandCwesee:

A. Distance(d)versustime(t)graphshowsconstantacceleration(a)plottedasacurve.

B. Velocity(V)versustime(t)graphpresentstheconstantacceleration(a)asastraightlineraisingovertime.

C. Acceleration(a)versustime(t)graphrepresentstheconstantacceleration(a)asastraighthorizontalline.

Wecanalsoseeinfigure3thatsomeareasundertheplottedlinesareshapedastrianglesorrectangles.Wealsoknowthatwecanmathematicallytransform,forexample,accelerationtovelocityorvelocitytodistanceusingthecalculusfunctioncalledintegration.Integrationisthesameascomputingtheareaunderaplottedcurve.Bycarefullychoosingagraphingmethodthatwillavoidcurvesandonlyusesstraightlineswecansimplifythemathematicsforthe“integration”orareacalculationstobasicgeometryareacalculationsofrectanglesandtriangles:

Areaofarectangle Height Width

AreaofatriangleHeight Width

2

Width

HeightArea

Rectangle

Width

HeightAreaTriangle

Forexampleinfigure3C,velocity(V)istheintegrationofacceleration(a).Thus,integrationistheareaundertheplottedlineintheaccelerationversustimegraphwhichisequaltothe“height”constantacceleration(a)timesthe“width”elapsedtime(Δt).5.5ThebenefitsofthevelocityversustimegraphFromthethreegraphingoptionswecanseethatbychoosingavelocity(V)versustime(t)graphwegetthesekeybenefits:

1. Theconstantacceleration(a)definedbytheITEaveragedecelerationrate,isvelocity(V)plottedasastraightlineinavelocityversustimegraph.

Page 9: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page8

2. Singleintegrationwhichistheareaundertheplottedlineofthevelocityversustimegraphwillcalculatetraveleddistance(Δd)duringtheelapsedtime(Δt).

3. Theintegrationofthevelocityversustimeplotbecomessimplesincethegraphonlyhavestraightlinesandwecanusebasicmathematicssuchasareaandgeometrycalculationsofrectangularandtriangularshapes.Thusavoidingusingadvancedcalculusfunctionsormathematicsoncurves.

4. Velocityorvehiclespeedistheinstantaneousmeasurementweasdriversaremostfamiliarwith.

BeforewegraphtheITEformulaitselfwecanstarttolookatsimplevehiclemotionprofilesusingthisgraphingmethodandseewithexampleshowvehiclevelocityorspeedversustimerelatetodistanceandaccelerationandtheircorrespondingmathematicalformulas.6.Firstmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithaconstantvelocity

Velocity,V

Time,t

t0 t100

V0

Fig.4‐ConstantVelocity

Area

Variables:

Δ Δ Δ

Formulas:

ΔΔ

Δ Δ

ΔΔ

Figure4showsavelocityversustimegraphofavehicletravelingataconstantspeedV0fromtimet0totimet1.Theconstantspeedisrepresentedasastraighthorizontallineovertime.Speedorvelocityisdefinedasdistancetraveledoverelapsedtimeaswealsoseeintheunitsweuseforspeedsuchasmilesperhour(mph).Basedonthedefinitionofaveragevelocitywehave:

,, Δ, Δ

(6.1)

Rearrangingaboveequation(6.1)wealsoget: , Δ Δ (6.2)

And:

, ΔΔ (6.3)

Area Distance, ∆

Page 10: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page9 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

Wecanalsoseethattheareaunderthegraphistheheight(velocity,V0)multipliedwiththewidth(elapsedtime,Δt=t1‐t0).Thisareaunderthegraphisthesameasthetraveleddistance(Δ )ofthevehicleasshowninequation(6.2).Thisvisualunderstandingthattheareaundertheplottedlineinavelocityversustimegraphequalsdistancewillbeveryusefulwhenwestarttolookatmorecomplexmotionprofileswithchangingvehiclespeedsovertime.Thischangeofvelocityovertimeisalsoreferredtoasaccelerationordeceleration.7.Secondmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithaconstantacceleration

Velocity,V

V

Time,t

Fig.5‐ConstantAccelerationt0 t1

00

1

Acceler

ation,a

V0

Area

Variables:

Δ Δ Δ

Formulas:

Δ

Δ

Δ

Δ Δ2

Δ2

Figure5showsavelocityversustimegraphofavehicleacceleratingataconstantrate(a)fromastandstill.Attimet0thevehiclehasreachedaspeedV0andattimet1thevehiclehasreachedspeedV1.Theaverageacceleration(a)ofthevehicleisdefinedaschangeinvelocity(V1‐V0)overelapsedtime(Δt=t1‐t0).Thedefinitionofaverageaccelerationis:

,,, Δ

(7.1)

Whenthevehiclespeedisincreasingovertime,aspresentedinfigure5,thetermV1‐V0informula(7.1)becomespositiveandwehavepositiveacceleration.IfthevehiclespeedisdecreasingovertimethetermV1‐V0becomesnegativeandwegetnegativeacceleration.Negativeaccelerationisalsocalleddecelerationandoccurswhenthevehicleisslowingdownorstopping.

Rearrangingaboveequation(7.1)wealsoget:

, Δ (7.2)

And:

, Δ (7.3)Note:Asfigure5shows,V1representsendvelocityandV0initialvelocity.

Area Distance, ∆

Page 11: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page10

Infigure5,theareaunderthegraph,whichisalsothedistancethevehicleistravelingduringtheelapsedtime(Δt=t1‐t0),isnotaseasytocalculateaswiththepreviousconstantvelocityvehicleexample.Tosolvetheproblemwewilllookatthetwospeedvaluesattimet0andt1andcalculatetheaveragevelocity.TheaveragevelocityissimplethesumofV1+V0dividedby2.Theareaunderthecurveisthentheaverage“height”orvelocitytimestheelapsedtime“width”.Theformulaforthetraveleddistance(Δ )duringtheelapsedtime(Δt)isthen:

, Δ Δ2

(7.4)

Ifwedonotknowthetime(Δt)wecancombinetheabovedistanceformula(7.4)withtheformulaforelapsedtime(7.2)asshownhere:

Take(7.2) Δ andcombinewith(7.4) Δ Δ2

whichgives:

, Δ2

(7.5)

Hint:Usetheconjugaterule tocombinetheaboveformulas.8.Thirdmotionexample:Avehicletravelingwithastoppingmotion

Velocity,V

Time,t

t0 t2=00

V1

Fig.6‐ConstantVelocityandDecelerationt1

Deceleration,aArea1 Area2

V2

V0,

Area1formulas:

, ∆Δ

, Δ ∆ Area2formulas:

, ∆

, Δ ∆2

, Δ2

Figure6showsavehicletravelingwithaninitialconstantvelocity(V0)upuntiltimet1.Thevelocity(V1)attimet1isstillV0sowehaveV0=V1.Fromt1thevehicleisdeceleratingataconstantrate(a)toacompletestopattimet2.Ifwealsointroduceaninitialtimet0whichisanaddedtimebeforethevehicleisdeceleratingweseethatthisisavehiclemotionprofilethatistakingtheshapeofthefirsttwotermsoftheITEformula(1.1)–driverperceptionandreactiontime(t1–t0)plusvehiclestoppingtime(t2–t1).8.1TotaltraveleddistancecalculationsTheITEformula’sfirsttermisthedriverperceptionandreactiontime.Infigure6wecansettheelapsedtime(Δt1)betweentimet0tot1tobethedriverperceptionandreactiontimevalue.Area1

Area1 Distance, ∆

Area2 Distance, ∆

Page 12: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page11 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

isthenthedistancethevehiclewouldtravelduringthisperceptionandreactiontime.Wecanusethefirstmotionexampleanduseitsinformationwithformula(6.2)sincebetweentimet0tot1bothmotionexamplevehiclesaretravelingataconstantvelocity.Thearea1anddistance(Δd1)traveledduringtheperceptionandreactiontime(Δt1=t1‐t0)isthen: Δ Δ Δ (8.1)Fromtimet1tot2,figure6isshowingavehicle’smotiontoslowdowntoacompletestop.Attimet1thevehicle’sspeedisV1anditstartstodeceleratewithanaveragenegativeacceleration(a)untilithascometoacompletestopattimet2.Area2isthedistance(Δd2)thevehicleistravelingduringthestoppingordecelerationtocometoacompletestop.Tocalculatearea2whichisthedistance(Δd2)infigure6wecanusethesamemethodsandformulasasinthesecondmotionexamplewherethevehiclechangevelocityovertime.Inthisexample,thevehicleisdeceleratingtoacompletestopsoattimet2thevelocityiszero(V2=0).Therefore,thetwodistanceformulas(7.4)and(7.5)thenbecome:

2 Δ2

or 2 Δ2

SetV2=0(sincevehiclestoppedcompletely)andweget:

Δ2 or Δ

2

Since(a)isdecelerationornegativeacceleration,wechangethesignof(a)toget:

Δ2 or Δ

2

Thetotaltraveleddistance( d)infigure6fromtimet0totimet2isthen:

Δ Δ Δ andset

Δ2 or Δ

2

IfwecomparetheITEformulawiththetwoabovedistanceequationsweseethattheequationincludingthedecelerationterm(a)isthebestchoiceduetothisvariableispartoftheITEformulaasoneofthespecifiedinputvalues.Wecanalsosimplifytheformulabyusingthevariable(t)forthedriverperceptionandreactiontimeinsteadoftheelapsedtime(Δt1=t1‐t0).Thetotalstoppingdistanceformulaforthismotionexamplethanbecomes:

, Δ2 (8.2)

Theabovedistanceformula(8.2)isalsotheITE“onesafestoppingdistance”orthe“criticalstoppingdistance”ifthevehicleisstoppingonalevelapproachgrade(g=0),travelingataconstantapproachspeed(V),settingthedriverperceptionandreactiontimeto(t)andtheroadconditionsandvehiclebrakeswillallowadecelerationrate(a).

Page 13: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page12

8.2StoppingtimecalculationsLetusnowtakealookatthetimeittakesforthevehicletodeceleratefromtimet1tot2infigure6.Inthesecondmotionexamplewestudiedaccelerationandweusedthedefinitionoftheaverageaccelerationtoderivetheelapsedtimeformula(7.2)againseenhere:

Δ

Inthecurrentexampleweareusingdifferentreferencestotheinitialvelocityandtheendvelocity.Wecanrewriteformula(7.2)tomatchthisexample’sarea2asfollows:

Δ

WealreadysetV2=0inthisexamplesincethevehiclehascompletelystoppedattimet2.Wealsoknowthattheaverageacceleration(a)isnegativesincethevehicleisdecelerating.SettingV2=0andchangingthesignofvariable(a)torepresentdecelerationinsteadofaccelerationweget:

Δ (8.3)

Theaboveformula(8.3)calculatesthestoppingtimeofthevehicleinfigure6whichisdeceleratingatrateof(a)toacompletestopfromaninitialvelocityof(V1).8.3TotalstoppingtimecalculationsByaddingthedriverperception‐reactiontime(t)(Area1,Δt1=t1‐t0infigure6)toformula(8.3)wegetthetotalstoppingtimeΔtfromtimet0totimet2.Thus,thisformulawouldcalculatethetimeittakesforavehicletotravel“onesafestoppingdistance”orthe“criticalstoppingdistance”asperequation(8.2).Addingtheperception‐reactiontime(t)toformula(8.3)weget:

, Δ (8.4)

8.4ComparisontotheITEformulaLetusnowcompareequation(8.3)forthevehicle’sstoppingordecelerationtimeinfigure6withtheITEformula’ssecondterm(1.3)whichiscalculatingthevehicle’sdecelerationtimeusedforyellowtrafficlightchangeintervals.

Deriveddecelerationtimeformula (8.3): ITEformuladecelerationtimeterm(1.3):

Δ 2 2

SetV1=V(vehicleapproachspeed)andweget Ifgradeislevel,setg=0andweget

2

Theabovecomparisonshowthatthederivedstoppingtimeformula(8.3)isNOTmatchingtheITEformula’sdecelerationterm(1.3)andthetimeittakestodeceleratetozerofromaninitialspeed(V)foragivendeceleration(a).

Page 14: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page13 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

8.5Whythedifference?TheITEformula’sdecelerationterm(1.3)showanextra“2”initsdenominatorcomparedtoformula(8.3)whichiseffectivelydoublingthedecelerationrate(a)ordividingthevehicle’sapproachspeed(V)by2.Factis,theITEexpressionwillreducethecalculatedstoppingtimebyafactoroftwo.Weneedtoinvestigatewhythis“2”isaddedandalsowhateffectsithastothetimingofatrafficlight’schangeintervalrelatedtoavehicle’smotion.ItisnowtimetouseallthederivedformulasandthevisualgraphingtoolsbycalculatinganactualexampleusingthetypicalinputvaluesrecommendedbytheUSFederalHighwayAdministrationandtheinternationalInstituteofTransportationEngineers.

9.ITEformulaexampleusingtypicalinputvaluesForthisexamplewewillcalculatetheyellowtrafficlight’sstoppingtimeinapermissiveState(noclearancetimeaddedtotheyellowphase)fora30mphapproachspeedatalevelintersection.TheITEformulaandtheinputvaluesareasfollows:

2 2

(9.1)

Where:t = Perceptionandreactiontimeofthedriver,typically1.0secondsforanexpectedevent,(s).

V = Speedoftheapproachingvehicle,expressedinfeetpersecond,(ft/s).

a = Comfortabledecelerationrateofthevehicle,typically10feetpersecondsquared,(ft/s2).G = Accelerationduetogravity,32.2feetpersecondsquared,(ft/s2).g = Gradeoftheintersectionapproach,inpercent(%)dividedby100,downhillisnegative

gradeanduphillispositivegrade.9.1SpeedunitconversionFirstweneedtoconvertthe30mphvehicleapproachspeedtoft/ssoweworkwiththecorrectunits.Todothisconversionwelookattheunitmphwhichismilesperhour.Weknowthatonemileis5280feet.Wealsoknowthatonehourissixtyminutesandoneminuteissixtysecondssowecansetupthemphtoft/sconversionlikethis:

1 1528060

528060 60

52803600

1.466667 /

Theexamplehasanapproachspeedof30mphandifweapplythemphtoft/sconversionconstantweget:

1.466667/

30 44 /

9.2CalculationoftheyellowphasetimeNext,wecanaddtheinputvaluestotheITEformulafortheexamplecalculation:

2 2

1.044 /

2 10 /1.0 2.2 3.2

Note:Theterm“2Gg”becomeszerosincethisexamplehasalevelapproachgrade(g=0).

Page 15: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page14

LetusnowplottheexampleinavelocityversustimegraphusingthetypicalITEformulainputvaluesandalsovisuallypresenttheabovecalculatedtrafficlight’syellowphasetimeof3.2secondsreferencedtothevehicle’smotionprofile.9.3PreparingtographtheexampleToplottheexampleweshouldfirstinvestigatethedatatosetthevelocityandtimescalesappropriately.Hereisaninitiallistofthekeyeventsordatapointstoplot:

Vehicleapproachspeed,V=44ft/s(30mph) Driverperception‐reactiontime,t=1.0s Vehicledecelerationrate,a=10ft/s2 Yellowphasetime=3.2s

9.4CalculationoftotalstoppingtimeThepreviouslistpresentamaximumvelocityof44ft/sandamaximumITEyellowphasetimeof3.2seconds.Letusinvestigatethevehicle’sstoppingtime,Δ basedontheapproachspeed(V)anddeceleration(a)usinginformationandthederivedformula(8.3)fromthethirdmotionexample.Addingtheexamplevaluesweget:

, Δ44 /10 /

4.4

Ifwecanalsocalculatethetotalstoppingtimeusingformula(8.4)whichincludesthe1.0secondsdriverperception‐reactiontime(t)andwehave:

, Δ 1.044 /10 /

5.4

Basedonthisweseethatthehorizontaltimescaleshouldbeaminimumof5.4seconds.9.5VerificationoftheITEdecelerationrateWecanalsocheckthattheITEdecelerationrate,a=10ft/s2iscorrectbyusingtheformulaforthedefinitionofacceleration(7.1).Setvehiclestoppingtime,Δ =4.4s,vehicleapproachspeed,V0=44ft/sandV1=0sincethevehiclecomestoacompletestopinformula(7.1):

, ,

, ∆

Addvaluespluschangeaccelerationtodeceleration(changesignofV0andsetV1=0)andweget:

∆44 /4.4

10 /

Theaboveresultshowsthatthestoppingtime,∆ =4.4sandtheITEdecelerationrate,a=10ft/s2areverifiedcorrectlyat44ft/s(30mph)vehiclespeed.9.6CalculationofthetotalstoppingdistanceLetusalsocalculatetheexamplevehicle’stotalstoppingdistancewhichisalsoincludingthedistancethevehicleistravelingduringthedriverperception‐reactiontime.Herewecanusethe“onesafestoppingdistance”orthe“criticalstoppingdistance”formula(8.2)whichwasderivedinthethirdmotionexample.

Page 16: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page15 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

Theformulaandaddingtheexamplevaluesweget:

Δ2

1.0 44 ⁄44 ⁄

2 10 ⁄44 96.8 140.8

Thecalculated“criticalstoppingdistance”of140.8feetisthedistanceittakesforavehicletostopifitistravelingat30mphandthedrivertakesonesecondtoreactandrespondtoachangeofatrafficcontroldevicebasedonthecomfortableornonemergencyITEdecelerationrateof10ft/s2.Wenowhaveallinformationneededtoplottheexamplewithvalues.9.7GraphoftheITEformulaexample

‐1.0

Velocity,V

Time,t

Fig.7‐ITEFormulaExample‐30MPHVehicleMotionandTheYellowPhase

10

20

30

40

50

0

20

30

5

15

25

35

45

55

10

5

15

25

35

0.0‐0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 seconds

ft/smph

V=44ft/s(30mph)

a=10ft/s,ITEDecelerationRate

TheITEFormulaYellowPhaseTime

3.2s

Area1 Area2

INPUTVALUESApproachSpeed,V=30mphITEPerception‐ReactionTime,t=1.0sITEDecelerationRate,a=10ft/sApproachGrade,g=0

Area3

Area4

"Stop"

"Go"

"StoporGo"DecisionPoint

"Go"DistanceArea1+2+4

"Stop"DistanceArea1+2+3

22ft/s

NOTE:Area3=Area4

5.4s1.0s0.0s

2

2

9.8Grapharea‐distancecalculations

Figure7 AverageVelocity,V(Height) ElapsedTime,Δ (Width) Distance,Δd(Area)

Area1: 44 / × 1.0s = Δd1=44.0ft

Area2:44 ⁄ 22 ⁄

233 / × 2.2s =  Δd2=72.6ft

Area3:22 ⁄ 0 ⁄

211 / × 2.2s =  Δd3=24.2ft

Area4:0 ⁄ 22 ⁄

211 / × 2.2s =  Δd4=24.2ft

Page 17: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page16

Summaryofcalculateddistanceresultsfromfigure7

Driverperception‐reactiondistance: (Area1) Δd1=44.0ft

Vehicle“Stop”distance: (Area2+3) Δd2+Δd3=96.8ft

Total“Stop”distance: (Area1+2+3) Δd1+Δd2+Δd3=140.8ft

Total“Go”distance: (Area1+2+4) Δd1+Δd2+Δd4=140.8ft

9.9DriverdecisionsandoptionalbehaviorFigure7showsavehicletravelingataspeedof30mphor44ft/s.Attime0.0secondsthedriverseesachangeofatrafficcontroldevice‐atrafficsignalischangingfromgreentoyellow.Thedrivertakes1.0secondstoperceiveandreacttothetrafficlight’sphasechange.Duringthedriverperceptionandreactiontimeof1.0secondsthevehicleistraveling44ft(Area1).Afterthistimethedrivershallhavedecidedtoeither“stop”or“go”asfollows:

“Stop”decisionAt1.0secondsthedriverdecidestostopandthevehicleisdeceleratingatthetypicalrateof10ft/s2.Ittakes4.4secondstodeceleratetoacompletestopandduringthedecelerationthevehicleistraveling96.8ft(Area2and3infigure7).Thetotaltimeanddistancetraveled(includingthedistancethevehicletraveledduringthe1seconddriverperception‐reactiontime)is5.4secondsand140.8feet.Thistotal“Stop”distancetraveledisequivalenttoaddingArea1,2and3infigure7.

“Go”decisionAt1.0secondsthedriverdecidestomakenochangesandcontinuesattheconstantvehiclespeedof30mphor44ft/s.Duringtheyellowlight’stotalphasetimeof3.2secondsthevehiclewilltraveladistancedefinedinthefirstmotionexampleusingformula(5.2):

Δ Δ 3.2 44 ⁄ 140.8

Thetotal“Go”distanceof140.8feetisequivalenttoaddingArea1,2and4foundinfigure7.Wecanseethatthisconstantvelocitytraveleddistanceduringtheyellowlightphasetimeisthesameasforthedriverandvehiclethatdecidedtostopanditstotalstoppingdistance.

Usingtheunderstandingthattheareasundertheplottedlinesinfigure7areequaltothedistancetraveled,wehave:

Area1+2+3=Area1+2+4,sinceArea3=Area4

9.10TheITEformulaexample’sconclusionsBystudyingtheexamplewecanseethatthe“Go”vehiclewilltravelthesamedistanceduringtheITEformula’syellowphasetimeasthe“Stop”vehiclewilltraveltoacompletestop.However,the“Stop”vehiclewilltake5.4secondstocompleteitstraveleddistanceversus3.2secondsforthe“Go”vehicle.WecannowdrawtheconclusionthattheITEformulafortheyellowlight’stotalstoppingtimeisactuallyNOTbasedontime–theformulaisbasedonequaldistancetraveledfora“Stop”ora“Go”vehicleuptoaspecificpoint–theintersection’sentrypoint.Thisunderstandingexplainstheadded

Page 18: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page17 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

“2”inthedenominatoroftheITEformula’sdecelerationterm(1.3)sincetheformulaitselfviolatesthebasiclawsofphysics.Yet,theITEformulaiscalculatingthetrafficlight’syellowphasestoppingTIMEforapermissiveStateintheexampleandwefindthatthe“onesafestoppingdistance”orthe“criticalstoppingdistance”isthereforethemostimportantformulatounderstandfortheexampleisasfollows:

Ifadrivertravelingat30mphfacesayellowlightwhenheiscloserthan“onesafestoppingdistance”totheentryoftheintersectionhemust“Go”andcontinueatthesameconstantspeedwithoutslowingdownreachingtheintersection’sentry.IfthedriverisslowingdownhemightnotbeabletoreachtheentryduringthetimeallocatedbytheITEformula’scalculatedyellowphasetimeandwillthusviolatetheredlight.

Ifadrivertravelingat30mphfacesayellowlightwhenheisfartherawaythan“onesafestoppingdistance”totheentryoftheintersectionhe“shallstop”andthedriverisabletostopcomfortablyandsafelybasedontheinputvariablesfortheITEformula.

Finally,basedontheunderstandingthattheITEformulaisnotcalculatingactualdecelerationtimeperthebasiclawsofphysics,weseethatthedecelerating“Stop”vehicleisstillmovingat15mphwhichishalftheapproachspeedwhentheyellowlight’sphasetimeendsanditistakinganother2.2secondstocometoacompletestop.Thetrafficlight’sphasechangetoredandtheextratimeisnotaproblemforthestoppingvehiclesinceitstillhas24.2feet(Area3)toreachthefull“onesafestoppingdistance”ortheintersection’sentrypoint.Thusthestoppingvehiclewillnotentertheintersectiononaredlight.However,whathappens,whenforinstance,avehicleiswithinthe“criticalstoppingdistance”andisslowingdowntomakearighthandturn?Letusinvestigate.10.Fourthmotionexample:AvehiclemakingarighthandturnTobecontinued…

Page 19: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page18

11.References

1. “TheProblemofTheAmberSignalLightinTrafficFlow”,(DenosGazis,RobertHermanandAlexeiMaradudin),Nov.1959:http://jarlstrom.com/PDF/The_Problem_Of_The_Amber_Signal_Light_In_Traffic_Flow.pdf

2. “TrafficSignalTimingManual”,(USDepartmentofTransportation,FederalHighway

Administration&InstituteofTransportationEngineersITE),June2008,(Page119safestoppingdistances,permissive/restrictiveyellowlaws&ITEformula;pages137‐138):http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/fhwa_hop_08_024.pdf

3. “TrafficSignalTimingManual”,(InstituteofTransportationEngineers,ITE),2009,(Pages5,12&13):http://jarlstrom.com/PDF/Traffic_Signal_Timing_Manual_ITE_2009_p5_12_13.pdf

4. “MakingIntersectionsSafer:AToolboxofEngineeringCountermeasurestoReduce Red‐LightRunning”,(FederalHighwayAdministration&InstituteofTransportationEngineersITE),2003,(ITEformula,documentpage33,Chapter3,YellowChangeInterval):http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/resources/fhwasa09027/resources/Making%20Intersections%20Safer%20‐%20A%20Toolbox%20of%20Engineering%20Count.pdf

5. “NCHRPReport731;GuidelinesforTimingYellowandAll‐RedIntervalsatSignalizedIntersections”,(NationalCooperativeHighwayResearchProgram),2012,(SeeChapter6,page44:"ShouldYellowChangeandRedClearanceIntervalTimingPracticesVaryBasedonStateVehicleCode?"anddifferencesbetweenStatespage64:"AppendixC"):http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_731.pdf

6. “StoppingSightDistanceandDecisionSightDistance”,(TransportationResearchInstituteOregonStateUniversityforODOT),Feb.1997:http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ACCESSMGT/docs/stopdist.pdf

7. “StoppingSightDistanceDiscussionPaper#1”,(OregonStateUniversity,RobertLayton,KarenDixon),April2012:http://cce.oregonstate.edu/sites/cce.oregonstate.edu/files/12‐2‐stopping‐sight‐distance.pdf

8. “2014‐2015OregonCommercialDriverManual”,(OregonDepartmentofTransportation,ODOT&DMV),2014,(Section5:AirBrakes):http://www.odot.state.or.us/forms/dmv/36.pdf

Page 20: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page19 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

12.AppendixA‐DefinitionoftheYellowTrafficSignalforVehiclesbyState

Source5:NCHRPReport731“AppendixC”

State Definition SteadyYellowSignalVehicleCode

Alabama PermissiveVehicular traffic facing a steady circular yellow or yellow arrow signal is thereby warned that the related green movement is being terminated or that a red indication will be exhibited immediately thereafter.

Alaska Permissive Nospecificinformationavailable,assumeUniformVehicleCodeasdefault.

Arizona PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignaliswarnedbythesignalthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Arizona Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignaliswarned thattheredor"STOP"signalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter,andvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersectionwhentheredor"STOP"signalisexhibited.

California PermissiveAdriverfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalis,bythatsignal,warnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisendingorthataredindicationwillbeshownimmediatelythereafter.

Colorado PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

ConnecticutPermissive(Correctedbyauthor)

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter,whenvehiculartrafficshallstopbeforeenteringtheintersectionunlesssoclosetotheintersectionthatastopcannotbemadeinsafety.

Delaware PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingthecircularyellowsignalistherebywarnedthataredsignalforthepreviouslypermittedmovementwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

Florida PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Georgia Permissive

Traffic,exceptpedestrians,facingasteadyCIRCULARYELLOW orYELLOWARROWsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Hawaii PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Idaho PermissiveAdriverfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalisbeingwarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisending,orthataredindicationwillbeshownimmediatelyafterit.

Illinois PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

Page 21: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page20

Indiana PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignaliswarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedandthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

Iowa Restrictive

A"steadycircularyellow"or"steadyyellowarrow"lightmeansvehiculartrafficiswarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedandvehiculartrafficshallnolongerproceedintotheintersectionandshallstop.Ifthestopcannotbemadeinsafety,avehiclemaybedrivencautiouslythroughtheintersection.

Kansas Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Kentucky Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

LouisianaPermissive(Correctedbyauthor)

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalaloneistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreensignalisbeingterminatedorthataredsignalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterandsuchvehiculartrafficshallnotenterorbecrossingtheintersectionwhentheredsignalisexhibited.

Maine PermissiveIfsteadyandcircularoranarrow,meanstheoperatormusttakewarningthatagreenlightisbeingterminatedoraredlightwillbeexhibitedimmediately

Maryland Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignaliswarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisendingorthataredsignal,whichwillprohibitvehiculartrafficfromenteringtheintersection,willbeshownimmediatelyaftertheyellowsignal

Massachusetts Permissive Nospecificinformationavailable,assumeUniformVehicleCodeasdefault.

Michigan Restrictive

Ifthesignalexhibitsasteadyyellowindication,vehiculartrafficfacingthesignalshallstopbeforeenteringthenearestcrosswalkattheintersectionoratalimitlinewhenmarked,butifthestopcannotbemadeinsafety,avehiclemaybedrivencautiouslythroughtheintersection.

Minnesota Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingacircularyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection,exceptforthecontinuedmovementallowedbyanygreenarrowindicationsimultaneouslyexhibited.

Mississippi Restrictive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignalshallstop beforeenteringthenearestcrosswalkattheintersection,butifsuchstopcannotbemadeinsafetyavehiclemaybedrivencautiouslythroughtheintersection.

Page 22: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page21 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

Missouri Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacinga steadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Montana Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignaliswarnedthatthetrafficmovementpermittedbytherelatedgreensignalisbeingterminatedorthataredsignalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.Vehiculartrafficmaynotentertheintersectionwhentheredsignalisexhibitedaftertheyellowsignal.

Nebraska Restrictive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowindicationistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection,andupondisplayofasteadyyellowindication,vehiculartrafficshallstopbeforeenteringthenearestcrosswalkattheintersection,butifsuchstopcannotbemadeinsafety,avehiclemaybedrivencautiouslythroughtheintersection.

Nevada Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthatasteadyredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter,andsuchvehiculartrafficmustnotentertheintersectionwhentheredsignalisexhibited.

NewHampshire Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

NewJersey Restrictive

Amber,oryellow,whenshownalonefollowinggreenmeanstraffictostopbeforeenteringtheintersectionornearestcrosswalk,unlesswhentheamberappearsthevehicleorstreetcarissoclosetotheintersectionthatwithsuitablebrakesitcannotbestoppedinsafety.Adistanceof50feetfromtheintersectionisconsideredasafestoppingdistanceforaspeedof20milesperhour,andvehiclesandstreetcarsifwithinthatdistancewhentheamberappearsalone,andwhichcannotbestoppedwithsafety,mayproceedacrosstheintersectionormakearightorleftturnunlesstheturningmovementisspecificallylimited.

NewMexico Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignaliswarned thattheredsignalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterandthevehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersectionwhentheredsignalisexhibitedexcepttoturnashereinafterprovided.

NewYork Permissive

Traffic,exceptpedestrians,facing asteadycircularyellowsignalmayentertheintersection;however,saidtrafficistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

Page 23: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page22

NorthCarolina Permissive

Whenatrafficsignalisemittingasteadyyellowcircularlightonatrafficsignalcontrollingtrafficapproachinganintersectionorasteadyyellowarrowlightonatrafficsignalcontrollingtrafficturningatanintersection,vehiclesfacingtheyellowlightarewarnedthattherelatedgreenlightisbeingterminatedoraredlightwillbeimmediatelyforthcoming.

NorthDakota Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowindicationistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficmaynotentertheintersection.

Ohio Permissive

Vehiculartraffic,streetcars,andtracklesstrolleysfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalaretherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartraffic,streetcars,andtracklesstrolleysshallnotentertheintersection.

Oklahoma Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

Oregon Restrictive

Adriverfacingasteadycircularyellowsignallightistherebywarnedthattherelatedright‐of‐wayisbeingterminatedandthataredorflashingredlightwillbeshownimmediately.Adriverfacingthelightshallstopataclearlymarkedstopline,butifnone,shallstopbeforeenteringthemarkedcrosswalkonthenearsideoftheintersection,orifthereisnomarkedcrosswalk,thenbeforeenteringtheintersection.Ifadrivercannotstopinsafety,thedrivermaydrivecautiouslythroughtheintersection.

Pennsylvania PermissiveVehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenindicationisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

RhodeIsland Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignaliswarned byitthattheredor"stop"signalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelyafterwards,andthevehiculartrafficshallnotenterorbecrossingtheintersectionwhentheredor"stop"signalisexhibited.

SouthCarolina Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

SouthDakota Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignalistherebywarnedthattheredor"stop"signalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterandsuchvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersectionwhentheredor"stop"signalisexhibited.

Page 24: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page23 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

TennesseePermissive(Correctedbyauthor)

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignaliswarned thattheredor"Stop"signalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterandthatvehiculartrafficshallnotenterorcrosstheintersectionwhentheredor"Stop"signalisexhibited.

Texas PermissiveAnoperatorofavehiclefacingasteadyyellowsignaliswarnedbythatsignalthat:(1)movementauthorizedbyagreensignalisbeingterminated;or(2)aredsignalistobegiven.

Utah PermissiveTheoperatorofavehiclefacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignaliswarnedthattheallowablemovementrelatedtoagreensignalisbeingterminated.

Vermont Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadyyellowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreensignalisbeingterminatedorthataredsignalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter,whenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.

Virginia Restrictive

Steadyamberindicatesthatachangeisabouttobemadeinthedirectionofthemovingoftraffic.Whentheambersignalisshown,trafficwhichhasnotalreadyenteredtheintersection,includingthecrosswalks,shallstopifitisnotreasonablysafetocontinue,buttrafficwhichhasalreadyenteredtheintersectionshallcontinuetomoveuntiltheintersectionhasbeencleared.Theambersignalisawarningthatthesteadyredsignalisimminent.

Washington Permissive

Vehicleoperatorsfacingasteady circularyelloworyellowarrowsignalaretherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterwhenvehiculartrafficshallnotentertheintersection.VehicleoperatorsshallstopforpedestrianswhoarelawfullywithintheintersectioncontrolareaasrequiredbyRCW46.61.235(1).

WestVirginiaPermissive(Correctedbyauthor)

Vehiculartrafficfacingthesignalistherebywarnedthattheredor"stop"signalwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafterandsuchvehiculartrafficshallnotenterorbecrossingtheintersectionwhentheredor"stop"signalisexhibited.

Wisconsin RestrictiveWhenshownwithorfollowingthegreen,trafficfacingayellowsignalshallstopbeforeenteringtheintersectionunlesssoclosetoitthatastopmaynotbemadeinsafety.

Wyoming Permissive

Vehiculartrafficfacingasteadycircularyelloworyellowarrowsignalistherebywarnedthattherelatedgreenmovementisbeingterminatedorthataredindicationwillbeexhibitedimmediatelythereafter.

   

Page 25: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014 

AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse Page24

13.AppendixB‐EmergencyStoppingDistancesandTimeCalculations(Rev.10)

Note:DistancesmarkedinREDviolatethe30mphcriticalstoppingdistanceof141feet.

 

COMMONINPUTDATA Value

Perception/ReactionTime,tpr (s): 1.0 (t=1.0secondsforEmergencyStoppingorITE,ExpectedEvent).

AirBrakeDelay,tb (s) 0.5 (t b=0.5+secondsairbrakedelay‐tractor‐trailers,schoolandpublicbuses)Grade,g (%): 0.0 (g isnegativefordowngradeandpositiveforuphill).

30MPHNOMINALDESIGN ITE,CarCriticalStoppingDistanceNonemergencyDecelerationRateDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31

DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00CriticalStoppingDistance,d c (ft): 72.3 103.8 140.7 182.9 230.5 283.5 341.8 405.5

TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 3.9 4.7 5.4 6.1 6.9 7.6 8.3 9.1

Car‐DRYPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 51.6 71.5 94.1 119.5 147.7 178.7 212.4 248.9TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2

Car‐WETPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.40 0.38 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.31 0.30 0.30DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 12.88 12.24 11.27 10.88 10.30 9.98 9.66 9.66

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 62.7 91.6 129.8 172.3 225.5 283.9 351.3 417.0TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 3.3 4.0 4.9 5.7 6.7 7.6 8.6 9.4

30MPHNOMINALDESIGN ITE,Truck/BusWITHairbrakedelayNonemergencyDecelerationRateDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00

CriticalStoppingDistance,d c (ft): 87.0 122.2 162.7 208.7 259.9 316.6 378.6 446.0TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 4.4 5.2 5.9 6.6 7.4 8.1 8.8 9.6

Truck/Bus,NOairbrakedelay‐DRYPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 58.4 82.1 109.4 140.3 174.9 213.0 254.9 300.3TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5

Truck/Truck/Bus,NOairbrakedelay‐WETPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 8.05 7.37 6.83 6.41 6.12 5.86 5.64 5.51

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 82.7 127.7 185.6 256.6 339.5 437.0 549.7 670.5TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 4.7 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.6 12.3 14.0 15.7

Truck/BusWITHairbrakedelay‐DRYPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 73.1 100.5 131.4 166.0 204.3 246.1 291.6 340.7TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Truck/Truck/BusWITHairbrakedelay‐WETPavementDesignSpeed,V (mph): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

AASHTOCoefficientofFriction,f : 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17DecelerationRate,a (ft/s2): 8.05 7.37 6.83 6.41 6.12 5.86 5.64 5.51

EmergencyStoppingDistance,d (ft): 97.4 146.1 207.7 282.4 368.9 470.1 586.4 710.9TotalStoppingTime,T (s): 5.2 6.5 8.0 9.5 11.1 12.8 14.5 16.2

IntersectionComparisonData: East&westboundSWAllenatSWLombard30mph,141ftcriticalstoppingdistance.

ReferencesAirbrakedelayandstoppingdistances:ODOTCommercialDriverManual:http://www.odot.state.or.us/forms/dmv/36.pdfStoppingdistances:ODOT/OSUFebruary1997:http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ACCESSMGT/docs/stopdist.pdfODOT/OSUApril2012:http://cce.oregonstate.edu/sites/cce.oregonstate.edu/files/12‐2‐stopping‐sight‐distance.pdf

Note:BothOSUreportsshowantypographicalerrorinTable3B(97report)and5A(2012report)forwetpavementemergencystoppingat50mph.(Correctvalue:351vstypo.error:357feet)

Page 26: Scientific AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ITE FORMULA AND ITS USE · This working report is a study of the universally adopted ITE formula which calculates a traffic light’s change interval

MatsJärlström•[email protected]•503‐671‐0312•Beaverton,Oregon,USA Rev.14•September9,2014

 

Page25 AninvestigationoftheITEformulaanditsuse

14.AppendixC‐DecelerationRatesandStoppingDistancesComparison(Rev.5)

Note:DistancesmarkedinREDviolatethe30mphcriticalstoppingdistanceof141feet.

 

 

(NoAirBrakeDelayAdded)

FederalandStateStandards ft/s2 g mph/s (t=1.0s,grade=0%) 25mph 30mphITE&ODOT"ComfortableRate": 10.00 0.31 6.82 → StoppingDistance,ft: 103.8 140.7

ODOT/OSUEmergencyStopping ft/s2 g mph/s (t=1.0s,grade=0%) 25mph 30mphCarDryPavement: 19.32 0.60 13.17 → StoppingDistance,ft: 71.5 94.1

CarWetPavement25mph: 12.24 0.35 7.68 → StoppingDistance,ft: 91.6 ‐CarWetPavement30mph: 11.27 0.35 7.68 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ 129.8CarWetPavement35mph: 10.88 0.34 7.42 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ ‐

Truck/BusDryPavement: 14.80 0.46 10.09 → StoppingDistance,ft: 82.1 109.4Truck/BusWetPavement25mph: 7.37 0.23 5.02 → StoppingDistance,ft: 127.8 ‐Truck/BusWetPavement30mph: 6.83 0.21 4.66 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ 185.5Truck/BusWetPavement35mph: 6.41 0.20 4.37 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ ‐

0.5sAirBrakeDelayAdded

ODOT/OSUEmergencyStopping ft/s2 g mph/s (t=1.5s,grade=0%) 25mph 30mphTruck/BusDryPavement: 14.80 0.46 10.09 → StoppingDistance,ft: 100.5 131.4

Truck/BusWetPavement25mph: 7.37 0.23 5.02 → StoppingDistance,ft: 146.1 ‐Truck/BusWetPavement30mph: 6.83 0.21 4.66 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ 207.6Truck/BusWetPavement35mph: 6.41 0.20 4.37 → StoppingDistance,ft: ‐ ‐

BusPassengerStanding ft/s2 g mph/s (t=1.5s,grade=0%) 25mph 30mphMaximumUnsupported: 2.25 0.07 1.54 → StoppingDistance,ft: 353.3 495.5

LossofEquilibrium: 5.47 0.17 3.73 → StoppingDistance,ft: 177.8 242.7UsingHandhold: 6.43 0.20 4.39 → StoppingDistance,ft: 159.5 216.4

UsingVerticalStanchion: 8.69 0.27 5.92 → StoppingDistance,ft: 132.3 177.3

BusPassengerSeated ft/s2 g mph/s (t=1.5s,grade=0%) 25mph 30mphVeryUncomfortable: 7.08 0.22 4.83 → StoppingDistance,ft: 149.9 202.6

DislodgedUntiltedSeat: 15.12 0.47 10.31 → StoppingDistance,ft: 99.5 130.0DislodgedTiltedSeat: 16.73 0.52 11.41 → StoppingDistance,ft: 95.2 123.9

NOTE:SWAllenBlvdatSWLombardAve,BeavertonOregonDesignvalues:V=30mph,a=10ft/s2,t=1.0sandg=0%→141feetcriticalstoppingdistance(ITE).(DistancesmarkedinREDviolatethe30mphcriticalstoppingdistanceof141feetatSWAllenBlvd)

ReferencesODOTandOSU,Emergencystoppingdistancesforwetanddryroadconditions:February1997:http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ACCESSMGT/docs/stopdist.pdfApril2012:http://cce.oregonstate.edu/sites/cce.oregonstate.edu/files/12‐2‐stopping‐sight‐distance.pdfAirbrakedelayandstoppingdistances:ODOTCommercialDriverManual:http://www.odot.state.or.us/forms/dmv/36.pdfStandingandseatedbuspassengermaximumdecelerationrates:http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/33000/33300/33313/33313.pdfhttp://ntl.bts.gov/lib/33000/33300/33340/33340.pdf

MaximumDeceleration,a VehicleSpeed,V

MaximumDeceleration,a VehicleSpeed,V