schema 2017 co-ordinated market prioritisation results · schema 2017 co-ordinated market...

Retail Markets Co-Ordination Design Service

Version : 1.0 of 15 Schema 2017 Prioritisation Results

Schema 2017

Co-ordinated Market Prioritisation Results



Table of Contents

1 Process 3

2 Input Criteria 3

3 Statistical Analysis Methodology 5

4 Results 6

4.1 SUMMARY OF ALL RESULTS RECEIVED. .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 ROI PRIORITISATION ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 NI PRIORITISATION ........................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 RESULTS FOR MPS WHO OPERATE IN BOTH MARKETS ........................................................................... 12

5 Next Steps 14



1 Process

ReMCoDS requested that all Participants in both Northern Ireland (NI) and RoI (Republic of Ireland) provide their rating against the full set of MCRs applicable to both jurisdictions. The request for prioritisation was made at the ReMCoWG on the 2nd November 2016. ReMCoDS followed up with MPs to ensure an acceptable number of responses were provided for assessment. ReMCoDS analysed the responses to produce 3 final prioritisation lists. These were:

1. RoI MP prioritisation of Schema impacting MCRs. 2. NI MP prioritisation of Schema impacting MCRs. 3. Co-ordinated prioritisation of MPs who operate in both jurisdictions.

This document which contains all prioritisation exercise details will be provided to the two DSO’s namely ESB Networks and NIE Networks. The DSO’s shall meet to discuss the results and provide a proposed Schema Release 2017 package and delivery schedule based on synergies between MCR’s, other Retail Market Work Programmes and priority.

2 Input Criteria

In order to develop the three prioritisation lists and identify the results in section 4, the following input criteria are acknowledged:-

Co-ordinated Respondent Group - 13 MPs responded. These 13 MPs are assessed on the following basis

o RoI respondent group - 11 MP respondents o NI respondent group - 7 MP respondents o MPs who operate in both markets – 5 MP respondents

Total List of MCRs - 9 MCRs were in the pot for prioritisation. o 5 MCRs were RoI MCRs o 2 MCRs were NI MCRs o 2 MCRs were dual

MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation NI

MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes ROI

MCR1167 Public Lighting Proposal ROI

MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI NI

MCR 1114

Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical Changes to HBL Schema....

Read more DUAL

MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more DUAL

MCR 0175 New Reject Reasons for Address Change Rejection.... Read more ROI

MCR 0073Proposal to make first name mandatory on market messages....

Read more ROI

MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more ROI

MCR Number Description Category

MCR Ranking Method.

o MPs rated the MCRs from 1 to 9 with 1 being their preferred MCR and 9 being their least preferred MCR.

o 0 was given where an MCR held no value to the Participant and they did not share an interest in its delivery.



Participant (MP) MCR ranking scores – each MP was requested to provide their organisational view of what MCR was top priority (value 1), lowest priority (9) or has no value (0)

Final MP Prioritisation scores - ReMCoDS converted the ratings provided by MPs into scores. Where an MP gave a rating of 1 this resulted in a score of 9. Where an MP gave a rating of 2 this resulted in a score of 8 and so forth. Where an MP did not rate an MCR it was scored zero.

ReMCoDS then split this overall MCR scoring into two lists. - An RoI list with 7 MCRs and - An NI List with 4 MCRs ReMCoDS then rescored these lists to give an MPs top scoring MCR in RoI a score of 7 and the top scoring MCR in NI a 4. (See example below). This was done for every MP in both jurisdictions. This method provides better clarity of MPs prioritisation where they operate in both Jurisdictions.

MP

Ranking

Score

Final

Score

1 9

2 8

3 7

4 6

5 5

6 4

7 3

8 2

9 1

No

Rating 0

Full List



Example

MP

Ranking

Score

Final

Score

MP

Ranking

Score

Final

Score

1 7 4 1

3 5 3 2

2 6 1 4

4 4 2 3

7 1

5 3

6 2

RoI NI

3 Statistical Analysis Methodology

The main statistical measure used to identify each jurisdictions prioritised list of MCRs was the average of the jurisdictions MP scoring per MCR.

A second metric was used to provide further clarity on the number of MP’s who voted for an MCR as one of their top 3 priorities. The second metric provided a useful insight into the strength of the MCR priority across the relevant market yet still allowing for anonymity. The results of this second evaluation more or less mirrored the results delivered by the average measure.

Metric 1 was applied to the four groups of prioritisation, namely:

MPs operating in both markets.

All MPs

RoI MPs

NI MPs

Metric 2 was used on

MPs operating in both markets.

All MPs

The definitions of metrics 1 and 2 are as follows:-

Metric 1: Statistical Average (Arithmetic Mean) – defined as: the sum of a collection of numbers (ranking score) divided by the number of items in the collection (respondent group)

Metric 2: was calculated by the Number of MPs who rated an MCR in their top 3 (i.e. who rated an MCR either 1, 2 or 3).



MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 9 9 8 8 2 9 0 9 0 6 1 0 5 5.08 3 66 6 2

MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 8 7 7 2 8 8 9 6 0 9 9 0 8 6.23 1 81 9 1

MCR1167 Public Lighting Proposal 1 6 6 7 7 7 0 1 0 8 8 0 7 4.46 5 58 6 2

MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 2 8 4 9 1 6 0 8 0 7 5 0 4 4.15 6 54 4 3

MCR 1114

Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical

Changes to HBL Schema. 7 4 5 3 5 5 4 5 0 3 2 0 3 3.54 7 46 1 5

MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 5 5 3 4 9 4 6 4 0 4 6 8 6 4.92 4 64 2 4

MCR 0175

New Reject Reasons for Address Change

Rejection.... Read more 6 3 9 6 6 3 8 7 0 5 7 9 9 6.00 2 78 6 2

MCR 0073

Proposal to make first name mandatory on

market messages. 4 2 2 5 4 2 5 3 0 2 4 0 0 2.54 8 33 1 5

MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 3 1 1 1 3 1 7 2 0 1 3 7 2 2.46 9 32 2 4

RankMP11 MP12 MP13 Rank

Total

ScoreMP7 MP8 MP9 MP10

No of Top 3

Ratings

Avg

ScoreMCR Description MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MP5 MP6

4 Results

4.1 Summary of all results received.



Arithmetic Mean Metric

Position Title Score

1st MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 6.2

2nd MCR 0175

New Reject Reasons for Address Change Rejection....

Read more 6.0

3rd MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 5.1

4th MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 4.9

5th MCR1167 Public Lighting Proposal 4.5

6th MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 4.2

7th MCR 1114

Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical Changes to HBL

Schema. 3.5

8th MCR 0073

Proposal to make first name mandatory on market

messages. 2.5

9th MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 2.5

Top 3 Metric


1st MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 9

2nd MCR 0175


Read more 6

3rd MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 6

4th MCR1167 Public Lighting Proposal 6

5th MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 4

6th MCR 0175 Email Address Validation.... Read more 2

7th MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 2

8th MCR 0073


messages. 1

9th MCR 1114


Schema. 1



ROI BOTH ROI Roi ROI BOTH ROI BOTH BOTH ROI Both

MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 6 2 6 7 7 6 0 7 7 0 6 4.91 2 54 8 1

MCR1167 Public Lighting Proposal 5 7 5 6 0 1 0 6 6 0 5 3.73 4 41 7 3

MCR 1114


Schema. 4 3 3 5 2 5 0 3 1 0 3 2.64 6 29 2 5

MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 3 4 7 4 4 4 0 4 4 6 4 4.00 3 44 2 4

MCR 0175


Read more 7 6 4 3 6 7 0 5 5 7 7 5.18 1 57 8 2

MCR 0073


messages. 2 5 2 2 3 3 0 2 3 0 0 2.00 7 22 1 7

MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 1 1 1 1 5 2 0 1 2 5 2 1.91 8 21 2 6

MCR Description MP3 MP4

Total

ScoreMP5 MP6 MP7

No of Top 3

RatingsMP12 Rank RankMP13

Avg

ScoreMP8 MP9 MP10 MP11

4.2 RoI Prioritisation

The overall RoI prioritisation scores are shown below.





1st MCR 0175

New Reject Reasons for Address Change Rejection.... Read

more 5.18

2nd MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 4.91

3rd MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 4.00


5th MCR 1114


Schema.... Read more 2.64

8th MCR 0073


messages.... Read more 2.00




MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 4 4 3 4 3 1 3 3.1 1 22 6 1

MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 1 3 4 3 4 3 2 2.9 2 20 6 1

MCR 1114Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical

Changes to HBL Schema.... Read more 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1.6 4 11 3 2

MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 2 2 2 1 2 4 4 2.4 3 17 6 1

MP7

MCR

Number Description MP1 MP2 MP3

No of

Top 3

Ratings Rank

Total

ScoreMP4 MP5 MP6

Avg

Score Rank

4.1 NI Prioritisation

The overall NI prioritisation scores are shown below.




1st MCR 1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 3.1

2nd MCR 1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 2.9

3rd MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 2.4

4th MCR 1114 Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical Changes to HBL Schema.... Read more1.6




MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 8 9 6 1 5 5.8 4 29 2 3

MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 2 6 9 9 8 6.8 1 34 3 2

MCR1167Public Lighting Proposal 7 1 8 8 7 6.2 3 31 4 1

MCR1154New Un-metered Tariff for NI 9 8 7 5 4 6.6 2 33 3 2

MCR 1114 Post-Harmonisation Sundry Technical Changes to HBL Schema.... Read more3 5 3 2 3 3.2 6 16 1 4

MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 4 4 4 6 6 4.8 5 24 2 3

MCR 0175New Reject Reasons for Address Change

Rejection.... Read more 6 7 5 7 9 6.8 1 34 3 2

MCR 0073Proposal to make first name mandatory on

market messages.... Read more 5 3 2 4 0 2.8 7 14 0 5

MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 1 2 1 3 2 1.8 8 9 0 5

Total

Score

No of

Top 3

RatingsMP2 MP3 MP4 RankMCR Number Description MP1 MP5

Avg

Score Rank

4.1 Results for MPs who operate in both markets





1st MCR1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 6.8

2nd MCR 0175


Rejection.... Read more 6.8

3rd MCR1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 6.6


5th MCR1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 5.8

6th MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 4.8

7th MCR 1114


Changes to HBL Schema.... Read more 3.2

8th MCR 0073


market messages.... Read more 2.8


Top 3 Metric


1st MCR 1167 Public Lighting Proposal 4

2nd MCR 1173 Vulnerable Customer Changes 3

3rd MCR 1154 New Un-metered Tariff for NI 3

4th MCR 0175


Rejection.... Read more 3

5th MCR 1183 010 Cust Agreement Validation 2

6th MCR 0176 Email Address Validation.... Read more 2

7th MCR 1114


Changes to HBL Schema.... Read more 1

8th MCR 0073


market messages.... Read more 0

9th MCR 0069 Irish language character set.... Read more 0



5 Next Steps

Network Operator Review - ESBN / NIE Networks will each separately assess the prioritisation results as laid out in this document.

o ESBN / NIE Networks will assess in terms of:-

Market prioritisation lists (provided in this document).

Wider Co-ordinated and jurisdictional Retail Market Delivery plans (consider other work programmes, projects etc.)

Developmental synergies with the Non Schema prioritisation results for each jurisdiction.

Cost.

Technical complexity.

Resource requirements.

Timescale.

Compatibility with other system work .

Joint Network Operators Review (NIE Networks and ESB Networks) – NIE Networks and ESBN will meet together to review the results from each jurisdiction.

o Fair and equitable distribution of delivered MCRs/functionality for both jurisdictions will underpin discussion.

Following the Joint Network Operators review, ESBN / NIE Networks will provide ReMCoDS with the following:-

o A proposed single Schema Package and

o A proposed delivery schedule (cut over date/s)

The proposed package will be communicated to Market Participants for review, revision and approval. This will take place at a ReMCoWG forum.

CER/UR to approve the final Schema 2017 package contents and delivery schedule dates.

The above can be summarised in the following overleaf:-



Activity Role Action Date

Rank each of the changes

1-9 with 1 being your top

priority and 1 your least

important

MPs Return to ReMCoDS by 30/11/2016

Consolidate and formulate

Co-ordinated Market

prioritised list.

ReMCoDS Within ReMCoDS 16/12/2016

Determine any action

required to get prioritised

MCRs approved by year

end.

ReMCoDSFormulate plan &

communicate by11/01/2017

Communicate outcome of

Prioritisation exercise to

Market at WG

ReMCoDSPresent at WG and

issue email by11/01/2017

Provide ESBN/NIE Networks

list of prioritised MCRs for

impact assessment.

ReMCoDSIssue to ESBN/NIE

Networks19/01/2017

ESBN/NIE

Networks/ReMCoDS

suggest proposed package

of changes based on

prioritisation and

dependencies between

MCRs. Proposed delivery

dates of changes provided

ESBN/NIE

Networks/ReMCoDSIssue to ReMCoDS by TBD

ReMCoDS ReMCoDS

MPs MPs

Co-ordinated Market

Approval of Schema

Package and delivery Date

at Forum

MarketApproves at Forum Q1

2017TBD

CER/UR approve Schema

Package and delivery Date. CER/UR Approve Q1 2017 TBD

Proposed package with

delivery dates issued to

Market for review &

comment

TBD

schema 2017 co-ordinated market prioritisation results · schema 2017 co-ordinated market...

Documents