scanned-spot-array optical lithography a strategy for bridging the ngl technology gap 10/19/20111k....
TRANSCRIPT
K. Johnson 1
Scanned-Spot-Array Optical Lithography
A Strategy for Bridging the NGL Technology Gap
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 2
Scanned-Spot-Array Optical Lithography
Objective: Develop a maskless lithography system that overcomes throughput and resolution limitations of prior optical maskless systems. Advantages of the system are:1. It eliminates optical proximity effects.2. It can use high-NA, wide-field immersion imaging (potentially solid immersion).3. Field curvature, distortion, and geometric point-imaging aberrations can be entirely
eliminated.4. The system can optimally control polarization over the full image field.5. The system can be equipped with confocal viewing optics for accurate focus/overlay
feedback.
The system is similar to Gratings of Regular Arrays and Trim Exposures (GRATE), in that it is applicable primarily to printing periodic structures. But the pattern period is at least two orders of magnitude larger than GRATE, and alternative embodiments could employ a spatial light modulator to eliminate the periodicity constraint.
The basic system design concept uses existing, proven technologies, minimizing technological risk, cost, and development time.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 3
Current State-of-the-Art Maskless Optical Lithography: LumArray’s ZPAL System
Advantages:• Maskless• No optical proximity effects• Simplified projection optics• Simple, planar micro-optics
Current state of development:• ZP-150A: 405 nm wavelength (I-line),
0.85 NA, 1000 write channels• Minimum Feature Size: 150nm Dense,
120nm Isolated• Writing Speed: 1.7mm2/sec (~2hrs per
Ø150mm wafer)
Limitations:• Resolution is not competitive with
193-nm immersion.• Requires continuous-wave laser.• Spatial light modulator limits
throughput.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 4
Gratings of Regular Arrays and Trim Exposures (GRATE)
Advantages:• Maskless (interference lithography), or very simple
mask design for critical patterns• No optical proximity effects
Current state of development:• Concept first developed, published by MIT Lincoln
Labs in 2001• Being developed by TowerJazz under contract to
DARPA, and by IBM under contract to USAF
Limitations:• Sub-micron periodicity constraint for critical patterns• Very simple periodic pattern geometries
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 5
Scanned-Spot-Array Lithography: Basic Design Concept
High print resolution:• No image-plane microlens array• Spatially-filtered object-plane source spots• No optical proximity effects
High throughput:• No spatial light modulator• Limitation: Requires CW or high-rep-rate
laser to get high throughput.
Low technological risk:• Can use existing reduction-lens technology
and scanning servomechanisms• Uses only low-NA, spatially filtered
microlenses• Uses only source modulation
Low development time and cost focused-spotarray
source-spotarray
laser
modulatorbeam expander
collimating lenslow-NAmicrolens array
aperture mask
reduction lens
raster-scannedprinting surface
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 6
Optical System Alternatives and Tradeoffs
Image-plane microlens array, full modulation (e.g., ZPAL):
Source-modulated: Object-plane spot array:
SLM
Simple, low-NA projection lens
Difficult, high-NA microlens array
No projection lens (just uniform, modulated illumination)
No SLM
Difficult, high-NA microlens array
Simple, low-NA microlens array
Complex, high-NA, wide-field projection lensBut the spot-generation optics can greatly simplify the lens requirements.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 7
Eliminate Point-Imaging Aberrations:Put aberration corrector in region where spot beams do not overlap; define phase profile to achieve aberration-free point imaging. (A Phase-Fresnel surface can correct narrow-band chromatic aberration.)
Eliminate Image Field Curvature:Put microlens foci on curved object surface configured to achieve flat-field imaging.
Eliminate Image Distortion:Distribute microlens foci on non-uniform, aperiodic grid configured to achieve strict periodicity of image pattern.
Implications for Projection Lens: • Less stringent design requirements• Less stringent manufacturing tolerances (with interferometry metrology
data used to optimize aberration corrector)• Consequently simpler lens design
Spot-Generation Optics can Supplant much of the Projection Lens Functionality
10/19/2011
ProjectionLens
K. Johnson 8
• Scan field: 25-mm square• Focused spots: 25- μm square grid• Number of spots: 106
• Number of scan lines: 106
• Scan line center spacing: 25 nm• Addressable grid spacing on scan lines: 25
nm• Number of grid points per scan field: 1012
• Modulation rate: 1 MHz• Scan rate: 1 sec per scan field (25 mm
square); roughly 25 wafers (300-mm) per hour
• Data rate with megapixel SLM: 1012 bit per sec
• Data rate with source modulation (periodic print pattern): only 106 bit per sec
Scan Pattern: A Conceptual Illustrationfocused spotscan line
surface scandirection
Periodicity constraint is, e.g., 25-micron square (versus submicron for GRATE).
Requires CW or high-rep-rate laser source.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 9
Laser Options
Available from Coherent :• 266 nm (frequency-quadrupled variant of Paladin laser system)• "Quasi-CW": 120 MHz• Currently 500mW ($120K). Will be upgraded to 1.5W in 12-18 months
(~$150K); can potentially be boosted to 6-10W at 80 MHz.
193-nm excimer laser options :• Currently only available up to 6 kHz (Cymer, GigaPhoton)• Multiplex N synchronized, low-power, low-rep-rate lasers to effectively
increase power and rep rate both by a factor of N.• Use more image spots (e.g. reduce pattern period from 25 μm to 10 μm –
equivalent to 6X rep-rate gain).
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 10
Solid-Immersion Lithography
10/19/2011
cover plate
projection lens
last lens element (solid immersion)
spot-generation optics(mechanically scanned)
wafer
Y
scan linefocus spot
X
bidirectional X-Y scan:
Scanning mechanism:• Mechanical actuation of spot-
generation optics (or beam scanner in projection optics)
• Wafer only moves for field stepping.Optical coupling:• Wafer contacts cover plate.• Last lens element contacts cover
plate during scan, is released during field stepping.
High-n glass options:• LuAG
• n>2• good transmittance @ 266 nm
• Sapphire• n =1.9 @ 193 nm, 2.1 @ 157 nm• good transmittance @ 193 nm
and 157 nm• Requires polarization control
because of birefringence.
K. Johnson 11
Focus and Overlay Feedback via Confocal Imaging
DUV (modulated)
633 nm confocal imaging system
Merge Exposure and Confocal Viewing Light Paths:• Split-aperture beam combiner, or• Dichroic beam combiner, or• Interleaved exposure/viewing
microlens arrays
Achromatization:• Common light path can be
approximately achromatized with a single-glass phase-Fresnel lens.
• Aberration correctors eliminate residual chromatic aberration.
• A phase-Fresnel lens can be simultaneously blazed for two wavelengths that have an approximate harmonic ratio, e.g.: 633/266 ≈ 12/5.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 12
Modulation Options
Shutters only operate intermittently; do not limit throughput.
Spot blanking can relax pattern-periodicity constraint.
10/19/2011
micromechanical shutters
Intermittent Spot Blanking Full Modulation with SLM
high-speed SLM
imaging optics
microlens array
K. Johnson 1310/19/2011
Stacked-Grating Light Modulator
Zero-Order Reflectance versus x (with ±5-nm tolerance range on air gap):
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
s
R[s]
x/d
8-micron pitch (d)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
s
R[s]
x/d
1-micron pitch (d)
Pixel optics:
d
x
Illumination/Reflection SiO2 grating
(stationary)
Al grating(MEMS-actuated)
OFF position
• ON- and OFF-state reflectance very insensitive to x and air gap.
• Can be used for gray-scale modulation.
K. Johnson 14
Zone-plate lens (with spider vanes), plan view:
Microlens array• Free-standing Mo zone-plate lenses
(85 nm thick; minimum line/space period is 135 nm if the object-plane NA is 0.1)
• Aberration correction is designed into the zone structure.
Microchannel plate
Aperture array• Passes first order from zone plates• Blocks scatter and extraneous orders• Slightly underfilled to accommodate
corrective aberration • Stationary aperture array replaces the
scanning photomask of mask-projection EUV.
Cross-section:
EUV (13.5 nm)
EUV Spot-Generation Optics
Limitation: EUV source rep rate (e.g. 100 KHz) will limit throughput (but will also limit power requirement).
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 15
Absorbance modulation optical lithography (AMOL)
Potential advantages:• Order-of-magnitude improvement in print resolution without
multiple patterning.• Optical wavelengths (with CW laser high throughput)
Current state of development:• Published: 36 nm lines printed with exposure wavelength of
325 nm, masking wavelength 633 nm• No demonstration yet of good-quality printing (incl. dense
patterns) with AMOL• Photochromic materials are being researched by LumArray
and U. Arizona (with DARPA support).• AMOL has generally only been considered for use with ZPAL
and interference lithography. (Other optical system variations are possible.)
Limitation:• Robust photochromic materials are still undeveloped.
10/19/2011
K. Johnson 16
Relevant Patents
• Almogy, et al., "Spot grid array imaging system," U.S. Patent 6,639,201, issued October 28, 2003, assigned to Applied Materials, Inc.
• Almogy, "Optical spot grid array printer ," U.S. Patent 6,897,941, issued May 24, 2005, assigned to Applied Materials, Inc.
• Menon et al., "System and method for absorbance modulation lithography," U.S. Patents 7,713,684 and 7,714,988, issued May 11, 2010, assigned to Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Johnson, "Optical Systems and Methods for Absorbance Modulation," U.S. Patent Application No. 13/103,874, filed May 9, 2011, unassigned.
• Johnson, "Scanned-Spot-Array Optical Lithography," U.S. Provisional Patent Applications No. 61/498,427, filed June 17, 2011, and No. 61/521,684, filed August 9, 2011, unassigned.
• Johnson, "Stacked-Grating Light Modulator," U.S. Patent Application No. 13/198,512, filed August 4, 2011, unassigned.
• Johnson, "Spot-Array Imaging System for Maskless Lithography and Parallel Confocal Microscopy," U.S. Provisional Patent Applications No. 61/525,125, filed August 18, 2011, 61/531,981,filed September 7, 2011, and 61/549,158, filed October 19, 2011, unassigned.
10/19/2011