sc2220 lecture 5 2011

20
SC2220: Gender Studies Lecture 5: Selling Gender Identity Eric C. Thompson Semester 2, 2010/2011

Upload: socect

Post on 20-Aug-2015

700 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

SC2220: Gender Studies

Lecture 5: Selling Gender Identity

Eric C. ThompsonSemester 2, 2010/2011

Page 2: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Where We Have Been…History of Gender

StudiesSex/Gender

DistinctionBecoming Male or

FemaleGender socialization;

paths to learning gender.

Gender SystemsMasculinity/

FemininityGender as systems of

beliefs and behaviors

Page 3: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Where We Are Going…Gender in Popular

CultureGender in AdvertisingPopular Culture

Gender in Social RelationsGender and PowerGender and Work

Gender, Here and NowGender in Singapore

Page 4: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Today’s Lecture…“Killing Us Softly” –

Images of Women in Advertising

Content Analysis and Influences of Advertising

Cultural Differences in Beauty

Why do advertising and popular culture seem to objectify women and not men?

Page 5: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

“Killing Us Softly 3”:Gender and Advertising

Killing Us Softly: 1979Still Killing Us Softly: 1987

Killing Us Softly 3: 2000

Page 6: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Men and Women in AdvertisingContent Analysis of Advertising general

shows the following:Men as “expert” voiceover announcer on all

types of productsMen overrepresented numericallyWomen younger, shorter, more likely

secondary roleWomen more often a smaller % of the image

Page 7: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Content Analysis of Advertising (Continued…)Men less often in family role; if dads then less

often with daughters or infantsWomen more likely appear unemployed or in

“pink collar” job; men are shown in all jobs (especially occupations with authority).

Men more often give advice, women receive advice

Ads selling to women more often focus on appearance; those selling to men focus on status.

Page 8: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

“Real Beauty”Dove “Real Beauty”

CampaignRevolutionary?Shock/Difference =

Attention = Interest = Sales = $$$$

And still . . . “Advertising involves selling us things we did not know we needed to solve problems we did not know we had.”

Page 9: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Shaping PossibilitiesBrittney Spears Pepsi Ad

CampaignInfluence on Clothing StylesIn mass market, clothing

choices are determined by producers as much as by consumers.

Low-cut jeans become the norm (and the only thing available in stores).

How many people choose to wear clothes other than those available in shops?

Page 10: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Masculinity and Advertising“Instruction Manual” & “Structure of

appropriate behavior”

Advertising exaggerates male status-seeking (as ‘what women want’) and female beauty & sexuality (as ‘what men want’)

Findings from Psychology:Men who view beautiful models are less

satisfied and less committed to current partner.*

Women who listen to stories about successful men are less satisfied with current partner.

See: David Buss, Evolutionary Psychology

Page 11: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

“Killing Us Softly”:Gender and Advertising

Version 4: 2010

Page 12: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Cultural Differences in Images of BeautySome aspects of

beauty are consistent across cultures:SymmetryWaist-to-Hip Ratio (.70)Indicate Health, Fertility

Many others are not.Why do standards of

beauty vary widely in different societies and cultures?

Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640): Set the standard of “Rubenesque” beauty.

Page 13: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Mauritania Fat-Farms: Force Fed Beauty

Page 14: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Radically Different Images of Beauty:But Equally Extreme

Correlation between Body Image and Status

If little food is available, fatness is a display of wealth and high social status.

If food is abundant, thinness is a display of discipline and leisure time to exercise and high social status.Anorexia = Beauty

Obesity = Beauty

Page 15: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Skin Deep BeautyAgricultural societies:

Dark skin = Working Outdoors = Low Social StatusLight skin = Staying Indoors = High Social Status

Industrial societies:Dark skin = Leisure Outdoors = High Social StatusLight skin = Working Indoors (factory/office) = Low Social

StatusRacism: White = European = Wealth = High Social

Status

Skin Whitening Products Skin Tanning Products

Page 16: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Influence of Mass Popular CultureMass popular culture =

greater body image pressure.

Introduction of television correlated with increased emphasis on body image cross-culturally.

Societies without mass media are much less obsessed with body image. (e.g. Shostak 1981, Nisa)

Page 17: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Men Don’t Seem to Need a“Real Beauty” Campaign

Page 18: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Objectification of WomenWhy are women’s bodies objectified and not

men’s? (or women’s bodies more so than men’s)Thesis 1: Men control advertising firms; they

choose to display women as sex objects (for their gratification and to perpetuate male power over women).

Thesis 2: Heterosexual dynamics are such that women are a sexual commodity in ways that men are not (there is a “market” for women’s sexuality; but not much of one for men’s).

The two theses are not mutually exclusion; evidence exists to support both.

Page 19: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Cultural, Social, BiologicalPopular Culture: Images teach us how to be

men, women, gendered beingsSocial Organization: Different social-

economic organization (agricultural, industrial; scarcity, abundance) influences cultural representations of high and low status

Heterosexual Chemistry/Dynamics: Inclines women to be Sex Objects more so than men.

There is no single explanation for gender. Gender systems are “overdetermined.” (see Ridgeway and Correll, p. 512)

Page 20: Sc2220 lecture 5 2011

Summary PointsAdvertising plays a powerful role in gender

beliefs.Advertising reinforces stereotypes and gender

polarization; playing on evolved psychology:Women appear as “sex objects”Men appear as “success objects”

Beauty has both culturally consistent and culturally consistent elements

Gender systems are “overdetermined” – by culture, social relations and biology; they cannot be reduced to single causes.