sandygate - burnley.gov.uk
TRANSCRIPT
Quality Management
Job No CS/065911
Project Sandygate
Location Sandygate, Burnley
Title Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Document Ref Extended Phase 1 Habitat
Survey
Issue / Revision 01
File reference Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Date July 2013
Prepared by Karen Nolan
Ecologist
Signature (for file)
Checked by Janette Gazzard MCEEM
Senior Ecologist
Signature (for file)
Authorised by Tabatha Boniface CEnv
MCIEEM
Prinicpal Ecologist
Signature (for file)
Revision Status / History
Rev Date Issue / Purpose/ Comment Prepared Checked Authorised
Sandygate July 2013
Contents
i
Contents 1. Summary 1 1.1 Instructions Error! Bookmark not defined.
2. Introduction 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Survey Site 2 2.3 Legislation and Planning Policy 3
3. Methods 6 3.1 Survey and Report Objectives 6 3.2 Desk-Based Study 6 3.3 Field Survey 7 3.4 Evaluation Methods 7 3.5 Survey Constraints 8
4. Site Description 9 4.1 The Site 9 4.2 Site Context 9 4.3 Project Description 9
5. Results 10 5.1 Desk Study 10 5.2 Field Survey 10
6. Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations 18 6.1 Overall Conclusion of Site Ecological Value 18 6.2 Protected Sites 18 6.3 Habitats 18 6.4 Protected Species 20
7. References 23
Figures Figure 1 Plan displaying the survey site 2 Figure 2 Amenity grassland at Sandygate looking north 11 Figure 3 Stands of white clover Trifolium repens within the sward 11 Figure 4 Area of tall grasses to the north of the site 12 Figure 5 Short perennial vegetation to the edge of the amenity grassland,
between the anti vehicle boundary (bottom right of picture) 12 Figure 6 Short perennial vegetation along the chain link fence to the
eastern boundary of the site 13 Figure 7 Tall ruderal species in the south west corner of the site. 13 Figure 8 Path and seating area in the centre of the site 14 Figure 9 Crevices in wall to the south western corner of the site 15 Figure 10 Structure to the north western edge of the site 15 Figure 11 Example crevice on the structure to the north west of the site 15 Figure 12 Peacock butterfly Inachis io larvae feeding on stinging nettle
Utrica dioca 7 Figure 13 East side of structure to the north west of the site 8
Sandygate July 2013
Contents
ii
Figure 14 Crevices in the wall suitable for roosting bats 8 Figure 15 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats 9 Figure 16 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats 9 Figure 17 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats 9 Figure 18 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats 10 Figure 19 Crevices in wall in the south western corner of the site 10
Tables
Table 1 Summary of local and nationally important habitats found on site
(JNCC, 2011) 16 Table 2 Summary of local and nationally important species found locally 17 Table 3 Species present within the area of short perennials at target note 1 5 Table 4 Tall ruderal species present and species that have colonised the
wall 5 Table 5 species present within the sward of the amenity grassland 6 Table 6. Species present in the area of long grasses to the north of the
site. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Appendices Appendix A Wildlife Legislation
Appendix B Desk study and Data Search
Appendix C Phase 1 Habitat Map
Appendix D Target Notes
Appendix E Additional Site Photographs
Appendix F Planting Recommendations
Sandygate 4 March 2013
1/ Summary
1
1. Summary
Capita Symonds Ecologists (Blackburn) have been commissioned to undertake an
extended phase 1 habitat survey of Sandygate, Burnley (SD 83505 32606).
An extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was undertaken on the 4th July 2013. This report details
the findings of the survey and provides an ecological baseline of the habitats present on site
and an assessment of the likelihood of protected or otherwise notable species to be present.
The habitats within the proposed development site predominantly comprise amenity grassland,
tall ruderal species, short perennials, built structures and hard standing.
The habitats that are considered to be of most conservation value comprise:
The wall to the rear of the site (for roosting bats)
Amenity grassland (for foraging bats and invertebrates)
Tall grasses (for foraging bats and invertebrate species)
Short perennial vegetation (for foraging bats and invertebrate species)
Further bat surveys are recommended to establish the presence of bat and bat roost within the
the stone structures on site . April and October
General recommendations to retain or enhance the biodiversity value of the site include:
The creation of areas of species-rich grassland;
The use of sympathetic lighting to reduce light pollution (Fure, 2006);
The placement of bat and bird boxes on appropriate structures across the site;
The use of native and wildlife friendly plants and shrubs in ornamental borders;
Sandygate 4 March 2013
2/ Introduction
2
2. Introduction
2.1 Background
Capita Symonds Ecologists, Blackburn, were commissioned in July 2013 by Barnfield
Construction to undertake an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey of Sandygate Site to support a
planning application.
2.2 Survey Site
The site is located at the junction of Sandygate and Neptune Street, Burnley, central Grid
Reference SD 83505 32606.
Figure 1 Plan displaying the survey site
Sandygate 4 March 2013
2/ Introduction
3
2.3 Legislation and Planning Policy
2.3.1 Legislation Certain habitats and species are subject to protection as laid out in the Wildlife & Countryside
Act 1981 (as amended) and/or the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as
amended). The following legislation lists the protected site and species that apply to the
Sandygate site.
For a summary of the offences relevant under each Act refer to Appendix A.
The Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)
o Bats
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010
o Bats
Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006
o Section 40 of NERC Act places a statutory duty on public bodies, such as local
authorities, that “every public body must, in exercising its functions have regard, so
far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of
conserving biodiversity”.
o Section 41 of the NERC Act requires the Secretary of State to draw up a list of
Habitats and Species of Principal Importance which should be used to guide
decision-makers (which include local authorities) in implementing their duty under
Section 40. This will apply to Burnley Borough Council under their Environmental
Strategy set out in Section 7 of the Adopted Local Plan (Burnley Borough Council,
2006) .
2.3.2 Planning Policy In March 2012 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published and replaces
the previous detailed Planning Policy Statement 9 (PPS9) (ODPM, 2005) although the guidance
document “Planning for Biodiversity and Geological Conservation: A Guide to Good Practice”
ODPM 06/2005 has not been replaced by the Framework.
The NPPF promotes plan-making and decision-taking with a presumption in favour of
sustainable development. Sustainable development is achieved where developments are
designed to address the mutually dependent threads of sustainability: economic, social and
environmental needs.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
2/ Introduction
4
In terms of biodiversity, sustainable development should not only achieve no net loss of
biodiversity but incorporate proposals that achieve net gains for nature alongside the
other social and economic needs of society.
Protected sites and species are a material consideration in determining planning applications,
therefore all information relating to protected sites and species must be submitted with planning
submissions for determination of the whole application. The NPPF promotes the approval of
plans where applications can demonstrate that they are in accordance with up-to-date Local
Plans and have addressed material considerations.
In accordance with the Adopted Burnley Local Plan (Burnley Borough Council, 2006) the
following local planning policies are relevant to the Sandygate site.
E3 – WILDLIFE LINKS AND CORRIDORS
Development will not be permitted where it would sever, or significantly detract from the function
of Wildlife Links and Corridors.
E4 – PROTECTION OF OTHER FEATURES OF ECOLOGICAL VALUE
Features of ecological value and potential such as ponds, hedgerows, dry stone walls and
watercourses and their associated corridors will be safeguarded wherever possible by requiring
their retention in new development. Proposals should take advantage of opportunities to create
new wildlife habitats where these can be included as part of a site layout and landscaping
schemes.
E5 – SPECIES PROTECTION
The presence of a protected species will be a material consideration in determining any
planning application Development that would affect sites supporting species protected by law
will not be permitted unless
.
(a) adequate provision is made within the proposed development to avoid disturbance to the
species and habitat in question; or
(b) adequate provision is made, by way of planning conditions or agreements, to:
i. facilitate the survival of the individual species affected;
ii. reduce the disturbance to a minimum; and
iii. provide adequate alternative habitats to sustain the viability of the local population of
that species.
E7 – WATER BODIES AND WATER COURSES
Proposals adjacent to the Leeds-Liverpool Canal, the Rivers Brun and Calder, reservoirs,
ponds, streams and other water features will not be permitted where the existing water quality,
amenity, recreation, nature conservation and wildlife value is adversely affected, unless suitable
mitigating measures are taken to avoid or minimise damage.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
2/ Introduction
5
2.3.3 Biodiversity Policy
Section 41 (S41) of the NERC Act 2006 requires the Secretary of State to publish a list of
habitats and species which are of principal importance for the conservation of biodiversity in
England. This list is the up-to-date list of Habitats of Principal Importance or Species of
Principal Importance requiring action in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and is used as a
guide to decision makers such as pubic bodies (including planning authorities) to implement
their duty of having regard to biodiversity when carrying out their functions.
Local Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) have also been written and adopted to develop plans for
species of nature conservation importance at regional and local levels. The Lancashire
Biodiversity Action Plan covers the Burnley area in which the survey site is located.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
3/ Methods
6
3. Methods
3.1 Survey and Report Objectives
1. To undertake a desk-based study of the proposed development area in order to establish
whether there were records of habitats of importance (on a local, regional, national or
international scale);
2. To undertake a field survey of the site to detail existing habitats and to assess whether
the habitats on site have the potential to support protected or otherwise notable species;
3. To evaluate the ecological value of the survey site and identify opportunities for
enhancement.
4. To provide advice and guidance in respect of the need for further appropriate surveys,
mitigation and enhancement proposals that will enable the development to proceed in full
compliance with relevant wildlife and nature conservation legislation.
3.2 Desk-Based Study
A desk-based study was undertaken in order to support the field survey and to establish the
presence of protected species or habitats of importance on and within a 2 km radius of the site.
MAGIC online resources were accessed for information on UK and European protected sites
and important sites including:
Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
Special Protected Areas (SPA)
Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
Ramsar sites
National Nature Reserves (NNR)
Local Nature Reserves (LNR)
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
Ancient Semi-natural Woodland (ASNW)
Mapped Biodiversity Priority Habitats
.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
3/ Methods
7
The following sources were also reviewed:
UK Biodiversity Action Plan
Lancashire Biodiversity Action Plan
Burnley Borough Council Local Plan
The above resources and Ordnance Survey maps were studied to locate any ponds or water
bodies within 500m of the site.
3.3 Field Survey
The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was carried out by Ecologist, Karen Nolan, on 4th July
2013. The survey involved undertaking a detailed walkover across the site marked by the red
line boundary at Appendix C. Observations of flora and fauna along with location and extent of
habitats were noted. The site and its habitats were also assessed for their potential to support
protected species.
The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was conducted in accordance with the guidelines set out
in the Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey (JNCC 2010). The extent of each observed habitat
was and is mapped at Appendix C. Photographs are included in this report to illustrate the
habitats descriptions.
3.4 Evaluation Methods
The ecological value of the site is evaluated against the following criteria:
Presence of statutory and non statutory protected sites on or adjacent to the site
Presence or likely presence of protected species on or adjacent to the site
Presence of Species or Habitats of Principal Importance and UK and Local
Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitats and Species on or adjacent to the site
Habitat quality and condition
Habitat and landscape connectivity, and
Presence of non-native and invasive species.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
3/ Methods
8
The potential impacts of land use change on the nature conservation value of the site are
assessed using these criteria together with an ecological judgement of the likely impacts on
habitats and species of ecological value identified through desk-based study and field survey.
3.5 Survey Constraints
Observations were limited to a single visit in June. Limiting the survey period to a visit in any
one month in the year does not take account of plant growth through the year. It is possible that
a small number of flowering vascular plant species would not have been evident during the
survey.
Observations were limited to a daytime inspection of the wall to identify evidence of the
presence of bats. External field signs of bats can be lost over time due to weathering and damp
conditions.
Because of the time constraints placed on this survey it was not possible to obtain protected
and notable species records for the site and surrounding areas.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
4/ Site Description
9
4. Site Description
4.1 The Site
The site is located on land at the junction of Sandygate and Neptune Street in the ‘Weaver’s
Triangle’ area of Burnley. The site is in a conservation area within the town centre and is
surrounded by an urban mosaic of buildings and derelict land. To the south west of the site is
the Leeds and Liverpool Canal. The site was formerly the site of weaver’s sheds which were
demolished some time after the 1960s. More recently the site has been landscaped with paths
and seating areas and the grass areas seeded. The site consists mainly of amenity grassland
which is mown short. There are some areas of long grasses, tall ruderal species and short
perennial vegetation to the edges of the site which have been allowed to develop in the
absence of mowing.
4.2 Site Context
The site is set in an urban mosaic comprising industrial units, derelict land and listed former mill
buildings close to the town centre of Burnley. The Leeds and Liverpool canal provides
connectivity to the wider landscape.
4.3 Project Description
The proposed development is for public realm improvements. This will include the construction
of a bridge and extensive hard landscaping of the site.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
10
5. Results
5.1 Desk Study
5.1.1 Protected Sites
There are no statutory or non-statutory protected sites within 2 km of the Sandygate site.
5.1.2 Ancient Woodlands
There is 1 semi natural ancient woodland located 1.69km north of the survey site.
5.1.3 Wildlife Corridors/Landscape Connections
There are no formally designated wildlife links or corridors situated within 2km of the survey
site. However the Leeds and Liverpool Canal, which borders the west of the survey site, is
classed as a wildlife link and corridor in the Burnley Local Plan under policy E3.
5.1.4 Waterbodies
No ponds have been found within 500m of the survey site. The Leeds and Liverpool Canal
immediately borders the survey site to the west.
5.1.5 Protected Species
5.1.5.1 BATS
Although time constraints prevented a protected and notable species record search with the
Lancashire Environmental Record Network, other sources have identified several records of
bats within 2km of the site.
5.2 Field Survey
5.2.1 Habitats The habitats found within the site boundary have been assigned according to Phase 1 Habitat
descriptions as detailed in the Phase 1 Handbook (JNCC, 2003). The habitat map is presented
in Appendix C and habitat target notes in Appendix D.
5.2.1.1 AMENITY GRASSLAND
Amenity grassland is the primary habitat present at the survey site (Figure 2). A short sward is
maintained by regular mowing and consists of several grass species including, perennial rye
grass Lolium perenne, annual meadow grass Poa annua and Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus.
There is also occasional broadleaved species within the sward including selfheal Prunella
vulgaris, daisy Bellis perennis, buttercup Ranunculus sp., ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata
and cinquefoil Potentilla reptans. The grassland has several localised areas of white clover
Trifolium repens distributed across the site (Figure 3). Several species of bumble bee (LBAP
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
11
species) were observed foraging on these patches during the survey, including red-tailed
bumblebee Bombus (Melanobombus) lapidaries and white tailed bumblebee Bombus lucorum.
A full species list is available in target note 3. The north western corner of the site is left un-
mown (target note 6) and an area of tall grasses has developed with a range of species
including annual meadow grass Poa annua, cock’s foot Dactylis glomerata, false oat grass
Arrhenatherum elatius and timothy. Phleum pratense as well as some broadleaved species
such as red clover Trifolium pratense, hedge bindweed Calystegia sepium and stinging nettle
Urtica dioca.
Figure 2 Amenity grassland at Sandygate looking north
Figure 3 Stands of white clover Trifolium repens within the sward
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
12
Figure 4 Area of tall grasses to the north of the site
5.2.1.2 SHORT PERENNIAL VEGETATION
To the southern edge of the mown grass area is a low level anti-vehicle boundary consisting of
short wooden posts (Figure 5). An absence of mowing between these bollards has allowed a
more diverse plant community to develop. The edges around the rest of the site have similar
plant communities (Figure 6). These edge habitats are the most diverse on the site with 21
species recorded (target note 1) and include herb Robert Geranium robertianum, hop trefoil
Trifolium campestre, silverweed Potentilla anserine and wall speedwell Veronica arvenvis.
Figure 5 Short perennial vegetation to the edge of the amenity grassland, between the
anti vehicle boundary (bottom right of picture)
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
13
Figure 6 Short perennial vegetation along the chain link fence to the eastern boundary of
the site
5.2.1.3 TALL RUDERAL SPECIES
In the south western corner of the site there is an area of tall ruderal species (target note 2). This
This area is not mown and has several broadleaved perennial species including rosebay
willowherb Chamerion angustifolium, curled dock Rumex crispus and dandelion Taraxacum
officinale agg. (
Figure 7). A full species list is given in target note 2.
Figure 7 Tall ruderal species in the south west corner of the site.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
14
5.2.1.4 HARD STANDING
There are several paths and seating areas on the site (Figure 8). These areas consist of a free
draining semi-porous surface of crushed stone or brick. Plant communities of short broad
leaved species and grasses have estasblished amongst the stone. A full species list is given in
target note 4.
Figure 8 Path and seating area in the centre of the site
5.2.1.5 WALLS AND STRUCTURES
There are structures on site. The first being a wall in the south western corner of the site,
(Figure 7 and target note 2); this wall has vegetation growing from several deep crevices
(Figure 9) including goat willow Salix caprea and rosebay willowherb
The larger structure to the north of the site is a thick wall that previously formed the corner of a
building (Figure 10 and target note 6). The structure is several metres thick with numerous
cracks and crevices present (Figure 11). Further images of the crevices in these structures are
provided in Appendix E.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
15
Figure 9 Crevices in wall to the south western corner of the site
Figure 10 Structure to the north western edge of the site
Figure 11 Example crevice on the structure to the north west of the site
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
16
5.2.2 Biodiversity Habitats of Principal Importance Table 1 lists the habitats found within or adjacent to the site boundary and whether these
habitats are listed as Habitats of Principal Importance in England and as Priority Habitats under
the Lancashire Biodiversity Action Plan.
Table 1 Summary of local and nationally important habitats found on site (JNCC, 2011)
Broad Habitat Habitat of Principal
Importance
Lancashire
Biodiversity Action
Plan
Amenity grassland x Amenity Grassland &
Sports Fields
Short perennial
vegetation
x x
Tall ruderals x x
Hard standing x x
Walls and structures x New and existing built
structures
Listed as national/local Habitats of Principal Importance/BAP species
x Not listed as Habitats of Principal Importance/BAP species x.
5.2.3 Protected Species
5.2.3.1 BATS
No evidence of bats was found during the survey but the habitats within the proposed
development site boundary have the potential to support roosting and foraging bats. Both the
stone structures on site contain suitable features such as gaps and crevices and the rest of the
site supports a range of invertebrates making it suitable for foraging bats.
5.2.3.2 Nesting Birds
No birds were observed during the survey and no evidence of nesting birds was found on site.
There are scattered trees suitable for supporting nesting birds but these are located
immediately adjacent the development boundary (target note 7)
5.2.3.3 Invertebrates
5.2.4 Several bumble bees including red-tailed bumblebee Bombus (Melanobombus) lapidaries and white tailed bumblebee Bombus lucorum. were observed during the survey foraging on clover,. Non-Native Invasive Species
No invasive non-native species were identified on site during the field survey.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
5/ Results
17
5.2.5 Biodiversity Species of Principal Importance
Table 2 details the species of local and national importance which have the potential to occur
on or adjacent to the site and that are listed as Species of Principal Importance in England or as
Priority Species under the Lancashire Biodiversity Action Plan.
Table 2 Summary of local and nationally important species found locally
Species Species of
Principal
Importance
Lancashire
BAP
Bats Soprano
pipistrelle, brown
long eared
Song thrush
Common Starling x
House sparrow Urban bumble bees x
Urban
bumblebees
Listed as national/local BAP species , not listed as BAP species x.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
6/ Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
18
6. Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
Below is an interpretation of the value of the biodiversity found on site to date and
recommendations in respect of methods of working in order to limit the development’s impacts
on biodiversity. In addition, biodiversity enhancement measures are provided that, if adopted,
would contribute to the sustainability of the development in line with the National Planning
Policy Framework and the conservation of biodiversity locally.
6.1 Overall Conclusion of Site Ecological Value
The site’s biodiversity value is largely attributed to the following which is explained in further
detail in the following sections:
The presence of Lancashire BAP Priority Habitats: Amenity Grassland and Sports Fields
and New and Existing Built Structures.
The presence of roosting and foraging habitat for bats, a European Protected Species
The presence of foraging habitat for UK BAP species such song thrush, starling or house
sparrow
The potential to support a range of invertebrate species including Urban Bumblebees which
are the focus of a Lancashire Species Action Plan.
6.2 Protected Sites
There are no statutory protected sites within 2km of the site.
There is one semi natural ancient woodland located 1.69km north of the survey site, a UK BAP
Priority Habitat, lowland mixed deciduous woodland. The proposed development at Sandygate
will have no impact on this habitat.
6.3 Habitats
6.3.1 Amenity Grassland The dominant habitat on the Sandygate site is amenity grassland which is recognised as an
important urban habitat under the Lancashire BAP. Although managed by frequent mowing and
likely to be disturbed by trampling, it does provide foraging and shelter to a range of species
including invertebrates, birds and mammals. It also provides an important function as managed
Sandygate 4 March 2013
6/ Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
19
greenspace offering a resource to local people to utilise alongside contributing to local wildlife
corridors. The Lancashire BAP aims to maintain, enhance and raise awareness of the
biodiversity potential of playing fields, amenity greenspace and sports fields.
The majority of amenity grassland will be lost by the proposed development, in order to offset
some this loss and minimise impact the following is recommended:
As much grassland should be retained or replanted within the development design as
possible. This could in the form of grasslands within the open space of the
development.
Where grassland is retained a less intensive mowing regime should be adopted which
will, over time, increase the diversity of the grassland. For example:
o Two cuts per year in early Spring and late summer
o Remove all arisings from the grassland after approximately one week
Where grassland is to be re-created a higher species-mix should be included including
species such as those listed below (refer to Appendix F for a fuller species list).
o Crested dog’s tail Cynosurus cristatus
o Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus
o Common knapweed Centaurea nigra
o Red clover Trifolium pratensis
o Lesser bird’s foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus
o Rough hawkbit Leontodon hispidus
o Tormentil Potentilla erecta
o Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata
o Self heal Prunella vulgaris
o Yarrow Achillea millefolium
o Yellow rattle Rhinanthus minor
If grassland such as this is created it will need to be managed as listed above as more
intensive mowing will limit the ability of these species to flower and set seed which,
over time, reduces the species-diversity within the sward.
6.3.1.1 TALL RUDERAL SPECIES
In the south western corner of the site tall ruderals have developed with an absence of mowing
This habitat is not recognised as Habitat of Principal Importance for biodiversity but does
support a range of invertebrates. Management of grassland areas post development should
include areas left un-cut to replace resources for invertebrates.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
6/ Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
20
6.3.1.2 SHORT PERENNIAL VEGETATION
Short perennial vegetation occurs along narrow edges of the site.This habitat is not recognised
as a important in its own right but did contain a high number of species due to less frequent
cutting. Management and creation of grassland areas post development should adopt
recommendations above to reduce the loss of species diversity on the site.
6.3.1.3 HARD STANDING
The hardstanding on the survey site is of little importance to biodiversity. Management and
creation of grassland areas post development should adopt recommendations above to reduce
the loss of species diversity on the site.
6.3.1.4 WALLS AND STRUCTURES
Both the structures on the site provide suitable roosting habitat for bats, European Protected
Species see section 6.4.1.
6.4 Protected Species
6.4.1 Bats
No field signs of bats or bats themselves were observed during the survey. However the site
does have suitable features within the stone structures to support bat roosts, and the existing
habitats within the site are likely to provide l foraging habitat for bat species..
If these structures are to be demolished or maintained at any time further checks for the
presence of bats should be made.It is recommended that a bat survey is undertaken of the
existing structures, to identify any existing or potential bat roosts. In addition, emergence and
activity surveys may be necessary where potential for roosting bats is identified.
If a bat roost is present or thought to be present, more detailed surveys may be required in
order to gain sufficient information to support an application to Natural England for a European
Protected Species (EPS) licence (to be undertaken May to September).
In order to conserve a foraging resource for local bat populations and enhance the roosting
opportunities the following measures that if adopted within the scheme would benefit bat
populations
Potential new bat roosting features could be incorporated within any new build on the
site such as the installation of integrated, self-contained pre-fabricated bat tubes, bat
boxes or bat bricks Any lighting to be incorporated within the development of the site
Sandygate 4 March 2013
6/ Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
21
should be designed to avoid disturbance to bats that are likely to forage across the site
and any new features incorporated within the development for bats as listed below:
o Low level directional lighting only should be used across the site
o The use of LED lighting or low-pressure sodium lamps with UV filters
o Limiting the height of lighting columns to less than 8 metres
o The use of cowls, hoods to increase directionality of light spill to an angle less than
70o
o Limiting the times lighting is used to create dark periods throughout the night
o Screening lighting with vegetation to create dark areas outside areas used by
residents/pedestrians (Fure, 2006).
The creation of additional natural habitats for foraging and commuting bats, including
native hedgerows and native scattered tree and scrub planting. Climbing plants should
also be planted to create additional biodiversity resources for invertebrates and bats.
Suitable species are listed below:
o Honeysuckle Lonicera periclymenum
o Ivy Hedera helix
o Jasmine Jasminium officinale
o Dog rose Rosa canina
o Field rose Rosa arvensis
6.4.2 Nesting Birds
There are no suitable habitats present with the development boundary for nesting birds but
there are scattered trees immediately adjacent with potential to support nesting birds. Should
any of these trees be removed in the future they should avoid the breeding season (March to
August) or checks for the presence of nesting birds prior to any removal should be made by an
experienced ecologist. If they are present works must stop until nesting has finished and any
young reared have fledged.
6.4.3 Invertebrates
The amenity grassland, short perennial and areas of tall ruderals have the potential to support a
range of invertebrates. Several species of bumblebee (LBAP species) were observed foraging
on the site during the survey, including red-tailed bumble bee Bombus (Melanobombus)
lapidaries and white tailed bumblebee Bombus lucorum.,these are Priority Species under the
Lancashire BAP. As a significant proportion of these habitats will be lost during the
Sandygate 4 March 2013
6/ Interpretation, Advice and Recommendations
22
development, the grassland recommendations (6.3.1) above should be followed, and use of
native species in ornamental borders and planting should be considered to further enhance the
site’s ecological value post-development and to provide further important habitats for
invertebrates.
Sandygate 4 March 2013
7/ References
23
7. References
Burnley Borough Council, 2006. Burnley Local Plan Second Review - 2006, Burnley : Burnley
Borough Council.
Department for Communities and Local Government , 2005. Circular06/05: Biodiversity and
Geological Conservation - Statutory Obligations and Their Impact within the Planning System,
Norwich : The Stationary Office.
Department for Communities and Local Government, 2010. Code for Sustainable Homes -
Technical Guidance, London: Riba Publishing .
Department of Communities and Local Government, 2012. National Planning Policy Framework,
Norwich : The Stationary Office .
Fure, A., 2006. Bats and Lighting. The London Naturalist, Volume 85.
JNCC, 2003. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey: A technique for environmental audit. 3rd ed.
Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee .
JNCC, 2011. UK BAP list of priority habitats. [Online]
Available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5706
[Accessed July 2013].
MAGIC, 2008. Multi-agency Geographic Information for the Countryside. [Online]
Available at: http://www.magic.gov.uk/website/magic/
[Accessed July 2013].
ODPM, 2005. Planning Policy Statement 9 - Biological and Geological Conservation , Norwich:
The Stationary Office.
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix A
1
Appendix A Wildlife Legislation The following has been produced as a guide, to outline possible offences that could occur
during development. For a definitive list of all species of flora and fauna, and a full interpretation
you should refer to relevant Acts listed below.
The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)
Schedule 1
Applies to all wild birds where it is an offence:
to kill, injure or take any wild bird (subject to certain exceptions)
to take, damage or destroy a nest whilst it is in use or being built
to take or destroy the egg of any wild bird.
It is also an offence to disturb any wild bird listed on Schedule 1 of the Wildlife & Countryside
Act 1981 (as amended):
while it is nest building
at a nest containing eggs or young
disturbs the dependant young of any such bird.
A.1.2 Schedule 5
For animals fully protected under Schedule 5 which includes, all bats. It is an offence:
to intentionally kill or injure or take
to intentionally or recklessly damage or destroy or obstruct access to any structure or
place which a species uses for shelter or protection, at any time even if the animal is
not there.
to intentionally or recklessy disturb whilst it is occupying a place which it uses for
shelter or protection.
to obstruct access to any structure or place which an animal uses for shelter or
protection.
A.2 The Conservation of Habitat and Species Regulations 2010
Schedule 2 applies to all European Protected Species (EPS) which includes all bat species, the
protection afforded is overlapping but separate from the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as
amended)
It is an offence:
to deliberately capture, injure or kill
to deliberately disturb
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix A
2
to damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a EPS ; this applies whether
species are present or not.
In order to permit a development where the above offences to a European Protected Species
are likely to be committed, a European Protected Species Licence can be obtained from Natural
England where appropriate mitigation is offered to offset the negative impacts to local
populations.
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix B
3
Appendix B Desk study and Data Search
B.1 Protected Sites
B.1.1 Protected sites (JNCC, 2011)
Distance (km) Site Designation Direction
1.69km Semi natural ancient
woodland
BAP North
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix D
5
Appendix D Target Notes
D.1 Target Note 1
Target note 1 is an area with a hardcore layer where short perennial species have developed
due to an absence of mowing. Similar communities exist along the adjacent chain link fences to
the east and north of the site.
Table 3 Species present within the area of short perennials at target note 1
Common name Latin name Abundance
Broadleaved willowherb Epilobium montanum F
Bush vetch Vicia sepium O
Buttercup Ranunculus sp. O
Common vetch Vicia sativa O
Daisy Bellis perennis O
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale agg. O
Groundsel Senecio vulgaris O
Herb Robert Geranium robertianum R
Hop trefoil Trifolium campestre O
Lesser trefoil Trifolium dubium R
Ragwort Senecio jacobaea O
Red clover Trifolium pratense O
Red fescue Festuca rubra R
Sheppard’s purse Capsella bursa-pastoris O
Silverweed Potentilla anserine O
Wall speedwell Veronica arvensis R
White clover Trifolium repens F
Wild turnip Brassica rapa R
Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus F
Hawkweed Hieracium agg F
Total number of species 21
D.2 Target Note 2
Area of tall ruderal species in the south west corner of the site which have developed in an
absence of mowing. The wall to boundary has potential to support roosting bats in the crevices
present. Species present are listed in Table 4 Tall ruderal species present and species that
have colonised the wallTable 4.
Table 4 Tall ruderal species present and species that have colonised the wall
Common name Latin name Abundance Bramble Rubus fructicosus R
Broad leaved willowherb Epilobium montanum F
Buttercup Ranunculus sp. O
Cleavers Galium aparine F
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix D
6
Creeping thistle Cirsium arvense O
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale agg. O
False oat grass Arrhenatherum elatius F
Goat willow Salix caprea R
Great willowherb Epilobium hirsutum O
Groundsel Senecio vulgaris O
Hawkweed Hieracium agg F
Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata F
Rosebay willowherb Chamerion angustifolium F
Sow-thistle Sonchus arvensis O
Total number of species 14
D.3 Target Note 3
Large area of amenity grassland, the most dominant habitat type on the Sandygate site.
Species present within the sward are listed in Table 5
Table 5 species present within the sward of the amenity grassland
Common name Latin name Abundance Annual meadow grass Poa annua F
Birds foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus R
Buttercup Ranunculus sp. F
Creeping cinquefoil Potentilla reptans R
Cock’s foot Dactylis glomerata F
Common vetch Vicia sativa R
Daisy Bellis perennis O
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale agg. O
False oat grass Arrhenatherum elatius F
Greater plantain Plantago major O
Hedge bindweed Calystegia sepium O
Hop trefoil Trifolium campestre F
Lesser trefoil Trifolium dubium F
Perenial rye grass Lolium perenne F
Ragwort Senecio jacobaea O
Red clover Trifolium pratense O
Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata O
Selfheal Prunella vulgaris O
Stinging nettle Urtica dioca F
Timothy Phleum pratense O
White clover Trifolium repens F
Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus F
Total number of species 21
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix D
7
D.4 Target Note 4
Areas of pathways and seating areas. These have hardcore to the base consisting of crushed
stone or brick, species present are similar to those listed in Table 3.
D.5 Target Note 6
Area of tall grasses and broadleaved species to the north western corner of the site which have
developed in an absence of mowing. Species present are included in table 5. This area is likely
to support a range of invertebrate species, including peacock butterfly Inachis io larvae which
were observed on site during the survey
Figure 12 Peacock butterfly Inachis io larvae feeding on stinging nettle Utrica dioca
D.6 Target note 7
Habitats for this area have been mapped but are not included in the advice provided in Section
6. These habitats do not form part of the current proposals. Semi mature goat willows are
present in the area to the north of the site boundary (see Appendix C) and do provide a
resource for nesting birds. Should this section to the north of the redline boundary be affected,
further advice should be sought from a suitably qualified ecologist.
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix E
8
Appendix E Additional Site Photographs E.1 Structures providing potential roosting opportunities for bats
Figure 13 East side of structure to the north west of the site
Figure 14 Crevices in the wall suitable for roosting bats
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix E
9
Figure 15 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats
Figure 16 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats
Figure 17 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats
6
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix E
10
Figure 18 Crevices in wall suitable for roosting bats
Figure 19 Crevices in wall in the south western corner of the site
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix F
11
Appendix F Planting Recommendations In order to enhance the broadleaved, coniferous scattered trees and hedgerows, the planting of a herb
rich field layer is recommended.
Species to consider include those found in the British Seed House WFG 8 seed mix:
Upright hedge parsley (Torilis japonica)
Slender creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp litoralis)
Ramsons (Allium ursinum)
Travellers joy (Clematis vitalba)
Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea)
Meadowsweet (Filipendula ulmaria)
Perforate st johns wort (Hypericum perforatum)
White campion (Silene alba)
Red campion (Silene dioica)
Greater stitchwort (Stellaria holostea)
Wood sage (Teucrium scorodonia)
Wood avens (Geum urbanum)
Hedge woundwort (Stachys sylvatica)
Crested dogs tail (Cynosurus cristatus)
Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea)
Recommended shrub and tree species to incorporate into the hedge include;
Elder (Sambucus nigra)
Yew (Taxus baccata)
Bramble (Rubus fructicosus)
Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna)
Dogrose (Rosa canina)
In order to contribute towards the UK and local Biodiversity Action Plan, lowland meadows, plant species
have been recommended. The inclusion of these species over amenity grassland in parts of the
proposed development, will also ensure credits for Eco 4 are gained.
Mg5 grassland (infertile grassland)
Slender creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp litoralis)
Crested dogs tail (Cynosurus cristatus)
Common bent (Agrostis capillaries)
Sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum)
Ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata)
Selfheal (Prunella vulgaris)
Bulbous buttercup (Ranunculus bulbosus)
Sandygate 2 July 2013
Appendix F
12
Yarrow (Acheillea millefolium)
Meadow buttercup (Ranunculus acris)
Agrimony (Agrimony)
Ox eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare)
Rough hawkbit (Leontodon hispidus)
Meadow vetchling (Lathyris pratensis)
Devils bit scabious (Succisa pratensis)
Tufted vetch (Vicia cracca)
Cowslip (Primula veris)
Pignut (Conopdium majus)
Cats ear (Hypochoeris radicata)