salmo salar l - lusedata · salmo salar l. aims and objectives ... 5 1 4 10,0 40,0 1 hr revival in...
TRANSCRIPT
The use of freshwater to control infestations of the sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis K on Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar L.
Aims and Objectives
• In addition to the exposure test for Atlantic salmon, freshwater bioassays will be done concurrently on Lepeophtheirus salmonis to assess the potential effects of freshwater on unattached lice.
This study has the objective of investigating a practical solution to control sealice infestations in an environmentally friendly way by using freshwater as part of an integrated approach:
• Groups of Atlantic salmon will be transferred to small-scale plastic cages which have been enclosed within a tarpaulin and filled with freshwater.
• The study will assess the efficacy of short-term exposure to freshwater and the effects of handling in removing all stages of sea lice from infested salmon.
Methods
• 125 m3 (5x5x5m) plastic cages each fitted with a standard net.
• Transferred to small-scale land base and fitted with an enclosed tarpaulin.
• System was then filled with approximately 140 000 L-1 of freshwater
• After filling, the tarpaulin and cages were transferred back to small-scale
System:
Transferering of fish (first study):
• 200 fish counted out and transferred into one of the holding cages
contained within the tarpaulin through pipe system fitted with a grid to
remove seawater
Transferering of fish (second study):
• Approximately 400 fish were transferred into each of the four cages
within the tarpaulin. One of the cages was used to study the effects of
different exposure times in freshwater
Methods – cont. Exposures:
First study:
Second study:
Group Transfer time for group
(minutes)
Additional time after last fish
transferred (minutes)
Exposure time
(minutes)
1 5 60 60 to 65
2 5 120 120 to 125
3 5 180 180 to 185
4 5 240 240 to 245
5 5 300 300 to 305
5c 5 300 300 to 305
SW control 5 0 0
Group Transfer time for group (minutes) Additional time after last fish
transferred (minutes)
Exposure time
(minutes)
1 5 60 60 to 65
2 5 120 120 to 125
3 5 180 180 to 185
4 5 240 240 to 245
4c 5 300 240 to 245
Methods – cont. Lice counting:
• Pre-counting before exposure and after each exposure time
• Lice registered in 5 categories:
Lepeophtheirus salmonis: Adult female
Lepeophtheirus salmonis: Adult male
Lepeophtheirus salmonis: Preadult
Lepeophtheirus salmonis: Chalimus
Caligus elongatus
Revival:
• All sea lice were counted and removed from every fish and assessed
for health status
• Each lice was categorized as either swimming and/or attached (normal
behavior); swimming erratically and/or poor attachment (affected) and no
activity (dead). After being categorized, the lice were transferred into a
container with seawater. The status of each louse was assessed every hour
after transfer. After two hours recovery in seawater the lice were discarded.
Methods – cont. Bioassays:
Water Quality:
• Lice collected the day before
• Minimum of 10 mature males and 10 mature females transferred
into bioassay box supplied. Each box is composed of two separate
chambers and a minimum of10 males were placed in one and 10
females in the other.
• Bioassays of 1, 2 and 3 hour exposure and seawater control
• After each exposure, lice were evaluated as follows:
Live: Normal behaviour, fast swimming if touched (- in a straight line).
Capable of sticking to the wall of the dish.
Affected: Not normal behaviour. The swimming is slow, sometimes in
circles, problems with sucking to the wall of the dish – they lose
attachment and fall down if they are touched.
Dead: No response even when gently probed.
• Oxygen saturation and concentration, salinity and temperature within
the tarpaulin were continually monitored throughout both studies.
RESULTS
Bioassays: The potential effects of freshwater
BIOASSAY 1
Mature females total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
1 hour exposure in freshwater
10
5 1 4 10,0 40,0
1 hr revival in seawater 7 1 2 10,0 20,0
2 hr revival in seawater 3 6 1 60,0 10,0
Mature males total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
1 hour exposure in freshwater
11
0 0 11 0,0 100,0
1 hr revival in seawater 0 1 10 9,1 90,9
2 hr revival in seawater 0 1 10 9,1 90,9
BIOASSAY 2
Mature females total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
2 hour exposure in freshwater
14
2 0 12 0,0 85,7
1 hr revival in seawater 2 1 11 7,1 78,6
2 hr revival in seawater 0 1 13 7,1 92,9
Mature males total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
2 hour exposure in freshwater 14
0 0 14 0,0 100,0
1 hr revival in seawater 0 0 14 0,0 100,0
2 hr revival in seawater 0 0 14 0,0 100,0
BIOASSAY 3
Mature females total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
3 hour exposure in freshwater
10
0 5 5 50,0 50,0
1 hr revival in seawater 0 0 10 0,0 100,0
2 hr revival in seawater 0 0 10 0,0 100,0
Mature males total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
3 hour exposure in freshwater
10
0 1 9 10,0 90,0
1 hr revival in seawater 0 0 10 0,0 100,0
2 hr revival in seawater 0 0 10 0,0 100,0
SW Control
Mature females total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
4hr 30 min 10 10 0 0 0,0 0,0
Mature males total number of lice live Affected Dead % affected % dead
4hr 30 min 10 10 0 0 0,0 0,0
1,24
0,87
1,03
0,69
0,22 0,25 0,25
0,06
1,84
1,47
1,34
0,84
0,59 0,53
0,41 0,44
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
1,40
1,60
1,80
2,00
pre
tre
atm
ent
cou
nt
seaw
ate
r co
ntr
ol
60
to
65
min
12
0 t
o 1
25
min
18
0 t
o 1
85
min
24
0 t
o 2
45
min
30
0 t
o 3
05
min
5 h
r cr
ow
din
g
Ave
rage
nu
mb
er
of
lice
pe
r fi
sh
mature males mature females
First study: reduction in average number of male and female lice after each
exposure time
30,1
16,8
44,6
82,4 79,8 79,8
95,0
20,3
27,0
54,1
67,7 71,1
77,9 76,2
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
100,0
Seawatercontrol
60 to 65 120 to 125 180 to 185 240 to 245 300 to 305 300 to 305crowdinig
Pre
cen
tage
re
du
ctio
n in
ave
rage
nu
mb
er
of
lice
Exposure time (minutes)
Mature males Mature females
First study: Percentage reduction in mature male and female lice
Second study: The enhanced effects of crowding
1,20
0,13
0,20 0,17
0,27 0,27
1,25
0,33
0,53
0,33
0,63
0,23
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
1,40
pre treatmentcount
60 to 65 min 120 to 125 min 180 to 185 min 240 to 245 min 4 hr crowd
Ave
rage
nu
mb
er
of
lice
pe
r fi
sh
mature males mature females
Second study: Percentage reduction in mature male and female lice
88,89
83,33 86,11
77,78 77,78
73,33
57,33
73,33
49,33
81,33
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
60,00
70,00
80,00
90,00
100,00
60 to 65 120 to 125 180 to 185 240 to 245 240 to 245crowding
Pe
rce
nat
eg
red
uct
ion
in t
he
ave
rage
nu
mb
er
of
lice
Exposure time (minutes)
Mature males Mature females
Conclusions • Very clear effect of freshwater in reducing both the number of adult
male and female lice on infected salmon
• Significant reduction of both mature male and female lice by 82.4% and 67.7% respectively after three hours - FIRST STUDY
• Mature male lice seem to be more sensitive to freshwater compared to mature females
• The lice that persist on the fish are more representative of the infectious population in terms of health status, reproductive capacity and/or age and are more resistant to the effects of freshwater than their conspecifics which were affected by exposure.
• Cessation in further reductions in attached lice after three hours.
• The lice that remained attached to the fish after 3 hours exposure may have a more secure attachment to the fish (particularly mature females).
The % enhanced effects of crowding
• Enhanced percentage reduction of 72% for males and 46% for females compared to the results after 1 hour exposure without crowding from study 1
• No evidence of pre-adult lice on the fish from 60 to 65 minutes onwards during study 1 and a reduction from 0.5 to 0.03 pre-adults per fish after 4 hours exposure during study 2. This suggests that this stage of the sea lice life cycle is also sensitive to short term exposure to freshwater
• First study: Mature male lice from group 5c (figure 4) which was subjected to an additional crowding of the fish prior to counting giving an enhanced percentage reduction of 95%.
This present study has clearly shown that in addition to copepodid susceptibility to low salinity conditions, adult lice are susceptible to low salinity levels under 1 ‰.
• Second study: Percentage reduction of 89% in mature males and a 73% reduction in mature females - AFTER ONLY 1 HOUR EXPOSURE!
Conclusions - What next?
1. The use of Well boats – commercial application.
• Large-scale project • More fish • Technical challenges – water quality (filtering, buffering etc.) • Freshwater intake • Biomass • Transfer of fish (in and out) • Test regime
2. Longer-term exposure
• Establishment of freshwater layers in small-scale cages • Use of desalination equipment/freshwater source • Monitor sealice infestations, growth and behaviour of salmon • Protocol established