7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

1/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

2/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

3/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

4/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

5/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

6/7

7/28/2019 Ruling Denies Manning Aided the Enemy Dismissal July 19, 2013

7/7

to ge ther w it hall re aso nable in ference s and applica bl e as su m ptions,v iewed in th elight m ost fa vor able to the prosecution,w ithou taneva luatio n of he cr edibility of w itnes ses , cou ld re aso nably tendto establish that th e accuse d "exceeded aut hor ize daccess"on a SIPR com put er .The coun te rvailin g evid ence presented by the Defense goes to thew eight of he eviden ce , ade ci sionproperl ydet er m in ed by th e fa ct- finder. Rul ing: The D efense M otio ns fo r a F indin g ofNotGuilty for the spec if icat ionof Charg e 1and spe cifica tion 13ofC harge II are Den ied . The Court will is su e a s upple m enta l rul ing re gar ding th e D efe nse M otions fo r a F in din g ofNot G ui lty for Spe ci ficat io ns 4 ,6 , 8, 12 , an d 16 ofCharge II in duecourse.So Orde red this 18th dayof July 20 13.

~ / d

7

D EN IS E R. L IN D CO L,JAChie f Judge, 1 st Judic ia l Circu it