rt6 ensembles @ rt3 and rt4/rt5 feb 2005 meetings ensembles meetings rt3 copenhagen, rt4/rt5 paris,...

14
ENSEMBLES Meetings RT3 Copenhagen, RT4/RT5 Paris, February 2005 RT6 Assessments of impacts of climate change y Morse, University of Liverpool - WP6.3 [email protected] ) in Prentice, University of Bristol - WP6.1 [email protected]) Carter, Finnish Environment Institute (SKYE) - WP [email protected])

Post on 20-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

ENSEMBLES MeetingsRT3 Copenhagen, RT4/RT5 Paris,

February 2005

RT6 Assessments of impacts of climate change

Andy Morse, University of Liverpool - WP6.3([email protected])

Colin Prentice, University of Bristol - WP6.1([email protected])

Tim Carter, Finnish Environment Institute (SKYE) - WP6.2([email protected])

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

WP6.1 Global changes in biophysical and biogeochemical processes – integrated analysis of impacts and feedbacks. Leader: UNIVBRIS Participants: UREADMM, PIK, ULUND, METO-HC, CNRS-IPSL

WP6.2 Linking impact models to probabilistic scenarios of climate change Leader: SYKE, UEA Participants: UREADMM, ULUND, UKOELN, NOA, DISAT, PAS, FMI, SMHI, UNIK, DIAS

WP6.3 Impact modelling at seasonal-to-decadal time scales. Leader: UNILIV. Participants: UREADMM, ARPA-SIM, JRC-IPSC, METEOSWISS, LSE, FAO*, WINFORMATICS, IRI, EDF, DWD.

* FAO are unlikely to participate due to UN/EU contract problems

27 partners & 11 countries - 141 months in first 18

- total 5 year budget €1,962,000

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

Consultation with impacts groups from the conception of the project and input to ongoing decision making

Defining fields and interval for data archiving (within reason)

Each impact or application (model) will have a required level of skill from the probabilistic driving variables to make forecasts of economic value

Therefore impacts/application users will define skill targets for probabilistic forecasting systems and carry out an important part of the final validation

Impacts/application partners should develop their models, where possible, to make use of ‘skill-in-hand’ of current probabilistic seasonal forecasting systems

The end-to-end approachthe role of impacts/application partners

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

RT6 Primary Areas of Investigation

6.1 The integration of process models of impacts on the natural and managed global environment into Earth System Models.

6.2 Linking impact models to probabilistic scenarios of climate change.

6.3 Maximizing skill in the impacts models driven by seasonal-to-decadal scale forecasting.

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

RT6 Primary Objectives

O6.a: Integrate impact process models ENSEMBLES Earth System Models.

O6.b: Impact models to describe system sensitivities through critical thresholds.

O6.c: Link impact models to ENSEMBLES probabilistic scenarios for risk-based estimates critical thresholds exceedance during 21st century.

O6.d: Impact models and new ENSEMBLES climate scenarios – understand impacts of extremes.

O6.e: Drive impact models with ENSEMBLES ESM and RCM output to give impacts forecasts at seasonal-to-decadal scale timescales at regional scales.

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

Scientific/Technical Questions

• Downscaling and bias correction implementation for impact models integration within EPS

• Maximizing skill of the ensemble forecast driven application models e.g. role of ensemble dressing of EPS?

• What level of forecast skill is required make a skilful impact model forecast?

• Attempt to quantify the sensitivity of agriculture, ecosystems and hydrology to future climate change in terms of thresholds

• Can we estimate the probability of exceeding these thresholds?

• Incorporation of probabilistic scenarios of climate change into probabilistic impact analyses.

• Impacts of extreme events compared with impacts of more frequent less extreme events

-tested for a range of sectors and activities.

• Impacts of combined biophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks within the EPS

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

WP6.1 Global changes in biophysical and biogeochemical processes – integrated analysis of impacts and feedbacks.

Work towards fully integrated European- and global-scale assessments of the impacts of changes in CO2 and climate on vegetation structure, function and productivity, forest and arable crop productivity, terrestrial carbon cycling and freshwater supply Consider the potential for feedbacks from these changes to the atmosphere and climate.

18 month activity

To set up the input data

Model developments for (a) global implementation of managed forests, and (b) global implementation of crops.

Perform first set of offline model runs for the recent past, present and future.

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

WP6.2 Linking impact models to probabilistic scenarios of climate change. Five Year Overview

Modelling behaviour of systems or activities in different environments developed, tested and applied under European conditions for evaluating the potential impacts of climate change.

Task 6.2.a Response surfaces and impact thresholds.

Task 6.2.b Scenario impacts and risk assessment

Task 6.2.c Evaluating the impacts of extreme events.

18 month planfirst phase of testing climate extremes models – wind, flood, drought etc.

Preparation of impact response surfaces for climate change scenarios against baseline data

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

9 RCMs ~50km … A22 RCMs ~25km … A2

3 RCMs ~50km … B2

2 GCMs

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

WP6.3 Impact modelling at seasonal-to-decadal time scales.

* Activity starting in first 18 monthsMaximizing skill in the impacts models driven by seasonal-to-decadal scale forecasting.

Closely tied to WP5.5 – Tier-1, Tier-2 and Tier-3 validation

Development of Integration Methodology includes downscaling and bias correction (working with other RTs)

Downscaling and bias correction for ensemble hindcasts * 18 month activity

Integration of seasonal-to-decadal application models within an EPS (DEMETER)* 18 month activity

Assessment of GCM vs. RCM driven seasonal-to-decadal application models.

Gaining the maximum skill from an EPS seasonal-to-decadal scale integration

Quantification of EPS skill requirements at seasonal-to-decadal timescales for application models.

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

WP6.3

Figures are discussed by Morse et al. 2004, CLIVAR Exchanges and further details in separate papers in forthcoming Tellus DEMETER special issue

Work of Marletto et al. ARPA

Work of Morse et al. Liverpool

RT6 ENSEMBLES @ RT3 and RT4/RT5 Feb 2005 Meetings

Issues and Linkages arising within RT6

• Timely and easy access to data – already in discussion RT1, RT2a, RT2b, RT3 and RT5

• Effective use of downscaling tools – already in discussion with RT2B, RT3 and RT2a

•RT5 for validation – with WP6.3 and WP5.5 directly linked

• Interest in RT4 findings

• RT7 economic impacts