rpt on diamond indicator sampling on prop of citadel gold mines … · 2017-01-17 · diamond...

41N15NE0030 2 16458 MCMURRAY

ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATESCONSULTING GEOLOGIST

1496 WELLINGTON STREET EAST SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO

P6A 2R1 Ph. (705) 946-8546

010

2-1645 8REPORT

DIAMOND INDICATOR SAMPLING ON THE PROPERTIES OF CITADEL GOLD MINES INC

IN MCMURRAY TP., ONTARIO

Report by:Roy J. Rupert, 1996-02-16

citdsamp.r

41N15NE0030 2 16458 MCMURRAY 01 OP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE 1.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS l

2.0 INTRODUCTION 2

3.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND ACCESS 2

4.0 OWNERSHIP 3

5.0 PRIOR WORK 3

6.0 CURRENT SURVEY, DIAMOND INDICATOR SAMPLING 4

7.0 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 5

8.O ACCOUNTING 6

9.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE AUTHOR

PLANS ATTACHED

Fig. 94-1 McMurray Tp., Mining Rights Owned by Citadel94-2 n B , Patented Mining rights owned by Citadel94-3 " n , Crown Mining Rights Leases " " "94-3 " B , Unpatented claims n "

Fig. 96-2 Sample locations. Diamond Indicator Mineral Survey, l" = 1/4 mile

APPENDICES

.APPENDIX A SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS

APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL RESULTS

APPENDIX C ACCOUNTS

citdsamp.r

DIAMOND INDICATOR SAMPLINGON THE PROPERTIES OF CITADEL GOLD MINES INC.


1.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

1.1 Between Sept. 1995 and Jan. 1996, Citadel Gold Mines conducted a program of till sampling on its properties in McMurray Tp. Ontario. The purpose of the sampling was to determine the distribution of diamond indicators, to more closely define drill targets for kimberlites. The program was also intended to provide assessment work credits for 21 claim units in four unpatented claims.

1.2 14 samples were collected from various sites as shown on attached plan 96-1. Samples were screened and -sent o Overburden Drilling Management Limited for extraction and identification of heavy minerals.

1.3 Gold, magnetite and niobian perovskite content af the individual samples indicates that the samples were representative of known geology in the up-ice direction freat respective samples.

1.4 This initial program encountered some technical problems which should be corrected in subsequent sampling programs:

1.4.1 Screening of samples using a rusty steel welded gravel screen inside a shop formerly used as an. electrical repair facility resulted in considerable sample contamination by metal and slag particles. Field screening using laboratory grade screens of appropriate size is recommended for future work. These contaminants do not create spurious indications but they did hinder identification of real indicators.

1.4.2 Budget limitations and Ontario Government assessment work regulations skewed the geographical distribution of samples. As a result, the program has not .provided definitive answers about diamond indicator distribution up-ice from the indicators found in prior government surveys.

1.4.3 Sampling of till or reworked till was attempted. The original intent was to pre-concentrate large samples using a Knelson concentrator. The Knelson concentrator did not in fact become avail-able. Samples had no re- concentration by steams, so the volume of heavy minerals was small. Future programs should select samples from sites in creek beds with natural pre- concentration, or use a port-abl-e table and screen for

citdsamp.r

Report On Diamond Indicator Sampling Page 2

pre-concentration of till samples, to ensure a larger representation of indicator minerals. Evaluation of samples must include an assessemnt of the degree of pre-concentration.

1.5 It is recommended that a second sampl ing program be conducted to define the up-ice source of diamond indicators in McMurray Tp., with sample sites on claims controlled by Citadel, without regard for their assessment work status. About 20 samples should be collected from selected sites. Samplers need adequate equipment for sample site evaluation, and contamination free sample processing. Estimated cost is $12,000.

1.6 It is recommended that the Deep lake magnetic anomaly be drilled to determine its cause. Estimated cost is $25,000.

1.7 Assessment work from this program may be distributed as follows:

Citadel patented claim block. 2/14 x $1621.68 Citadel claim no. 1110152 2/14 1621.68 Citadel contiguous claim nos. 10/14 8108.41

1110155, 1110154 k 1110153511351.77

1.7 Based on the results of this survey, abandonment of claim no. 1110155 is recommended as it expires in due course.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Roy J. Rupert and Associates was instructed to conduct a sampling program on 4 claims of Citadel Gold Mines Inc. to determine if there were indications of diamond bearing kimberlites there, and to provide assessment credits to maintain the claims in good standing.

2.2 The sampling was conducted in Sept, Oct. and Nov. 1996 under the direction of Mr. Russ Reid, P.O. Box 1346, Wawa, ON. In Dec. and Jan. 1996, the samples were processed by Overburden Drilling Management Limited to extract and identify diamond indicators. The report of ODML is attached. General supervision, direction and final report preparation was provided by Roy Rupert, 1496 Wellington St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 5A5.

3.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND ACCESS

-. --3citdsamp.r ines of Citadel claims in


McMurray Tp.3.2 Samples were taken from three separate blocks of claims

which are not contiguous. For assessment work purposes, these three blocks of claims from which samples were taken are listed as follows:1) Unpatented Claim no. SSM 1110152, l unit

2) Unpatented Claim nos. SSM 1110153, 4 units1110154, 6 units 1110155,10 units

21

3) Patented claim nos. SSM 3135 and SSM 2Sar part -of -a block of 145 patented and leased claims owned or leased by Citadel.

3.3 Plan 94-4 shows the Unpatented Claims for which assessment work is to be submitted. Plan 96-2 also shows the cLaim outlines.

3.4 Access to the claims is via the roads shown on Figure 96-2, from the town of Wawa ON, also shown on the maps.

4.0 OWNERSHIP

4.1 All of the claims listed aboved are registered or xecordad in the name of Citadel Gold Mines Inc.

150 Signet Drive Weston, ON M9L 1T9

5.0 PRIOR WORK

5.1 This area has been intensively prospected since the1800's. Gold prospecting activity peaked about- 187O r L897 to 1902, 1925 to 1939, and 1963 to 1970, and 1986 to 1989. Iron prospecting activity peaked about 1875 to 1885, 1899 to 1905, 1915 to 1918, and 1939 to 1960. Numerous government and private reports have been written and are on public record. The most recent summary Report on the area is Ont. Geol. Survey Open File Report no. 5586, by Ron Sage in 1993, Geology of Chabanel, Esquega, Lastheels and McMurray Tps.

5.2 In 1938 and 1939, promoters of two failed gold mines in the area attempted to promote them as diamond prospects: At this time, the Centennial and Wawa Goldfields Mines and mills were operated to take down backs in lamprophyric dykes and to process that rock for diamonds, in the unsuccesful hope that diamonds would be found in them.

citdsamp.r


5.3 In the 1950's, The Algoma Ore Division of the Algoma Steel Company Limited conducted drilling on the nearby Firesand Carbonatite. Objectives of this drilling were initially to find iron ore in the ferroan dolomite core of the intrusive, then to find ferroan dolomite or limestone flux, and as an afterthought, to evaluate possible niobium mineralisation there. This work and a public map are summarised in Ont. Dept. Mines Geological Kept. no. 3 by G.E. Parsons in 1961, Niobium Bearing Complexes East of Lake Superior.

5.4 Citadel Gold Mines Inc. and its predecessor companies have acquired mining properties in McMurray Tp. since 1961, and now hold claims as shown on plans. 94-1 to 94-4. Intensive exploration of these propertes for gold deposits has been in progress since 1961, including dozens of airborne .and -ground geophysical surveys, geological and geochemical surveys, diamond drilling, etc. Proprietary reports are in Citadel's files.

5.5 In 1993, alluvial prospecting near the confluence -of the Michipicoten and Magpie Rivers resulted in the discovery of two diamonds by local prospector Mickey Clement. As a result the Ontario Geological Survey conducted two programs of sampling in glacio-fluvial and glacial sediments to determine if diamond indicator minerals were locally present and if there was any indication of the bedrock source of the diamonds. Published OGS reports by Dr. Tom Morris indicate that diamond indicators are prevalent in the Trout Creek basin southwest of Citadel's claims, and that the probable source of the diamond indicators (and the two earlier found diamonds) is to the northeast, in the up-ice glacial direction. This indicates that Citadel Gold Mines' cXaXms are prime diamond prospecting territory.

5.6 As a result of these diamond discoveries, Citadel Gold Mines restaked certain adjacent claims in 1993 and -19-94 to improve. their ground position. Assessment work is due -on these claims in early 1996. Staking was guided by prior magnetic surveys conducted on these properties during gold prospecting by Citadel in the 1980's.

6.0 CURRENT SURVEY, DIAMOND INDICATOR SAMPLING

6.1 As indicated in the introduction, a diamond indicator survey was undertaken between Sept. 1995 and Jan. 1996. The purpose is to provide assessment credit on 21 claim units and to determine if there are indications of diamonds on those claims.

6.2 Samples of glacial till or reworked glacial till were collected at sites as indicated on Plan 96-2.

citdsamp.r


6.3 Sample sites were selected with the intent that the sampled material should be till. Due to heavy local organic overburden cover, sites were selected along lake shores where the character of the soil could be observed. Most sites were till with some reworking along the shoreline. Some of the samples near Leroy Lake were glaciogluvial sediment. Detailed sample descriptions are in Appendix A.

6.4 Samples consisted of about 100 to 200 Ibs of till taken in buckets at the sample site. The original intent was to concentrate heavy minerals from these large samples using a local Knelson concentrator. Due to death of the concentrator's owner, this concentration process was not practical. Instead the samples were screened to remove + 1/8" material, and coned and quartered to reduce them to about 30 Ibs size. This screening was done using -ara expanded steel mesh mason's gravel screen. Because of the need to thaw and dry samples, the screening was- done inside a building at the Surluga mine. Despite use of plastic sheeting, analytical results indicate that significant contamination of the samples occurred at this stage -of the process. The contaminants were metal and slag particles from the screen or the shop floor.

4.5 The 25 Ib. samples were shipped to Overburden Drilling Management Ltd., 15 Capella Court #107, Nepean, On, K2E 2X1, Each sample was processed through a shaking table and ̂ an to recover heavy minerals. The concentrate was processed using heavy liquid separation at specific gravity 3.2. All gold grains were counted and described. Other heavy minerals were picked for diamond indicator minerals using a microscope. Selected grains were identified using a scanning electron microscope.

6.6 Appendix B is the laboratory report submitted by Overburden Drilling Mangement Ltd., with a summary interpretative report by Dr. S. A. Averill.

7.0 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

7.1 The detailed sampling results are in Appendix-B, Appendix A is a description of the samples as shipped. The reader should refer to it.

7.2 Sample results were first evaluated for gold, magnetite and other minerals expected as a result of known up-ice geological conditions. The following discussion shows that the samples are indicative of the up-ice rocks.

7.2.1 Samples l and 2 show 5 and 4 modified to pristine gold grains, low magnetite and niobian perovskite content.

citdsamp.r


This suite is indicative of known up-ice geology which includes a few minor gold occurrences (Deep Lake Mine), felsic volcanic rocks and the niobian Firesand Carbonatite.

7.2.2 Samples 13 and 14 contain very large pristine to modified grains of gold and low magnetite content. This is compatable with an up-ice source with numerous gold prospects and past producing gold mines in felsic volcanic and intrusive rocks.

7.2.3 Sample 7 is from a very recent C-horizon disaggregated soil developed in only 7 years over a lamprophyre dyke which was exposed in 1988 by trenching along the high grade Root Vein Gold occurrence. The high gold content is as expected, and is indicative of source.

7.2.4 Samples 3 to 6 and 8 to 12 are from the Firesand River valley. The modest content of reshaped and uodi-f-ied ^oXd grains and higher magnetite contents of these samples -are compatable with known up-ice geology: an area of jnaf-ic volcanics and granitic rocks with numerous high- -and slightly auriferous iron formation beds. The low magnetite contents of samples 10, 11 and 12 are compatabl-e with field descriptions which suggest samples 10 -and J.2 are poorly chosen, with too much organic content.

7.3 Diamond indicators include 2 chromites and 28 picritic ilmenites.

7.3.1 One chromite with a diopside (crustal origin) inclusion is present in sample 7 from the lamprophyre dyke. This indicates that the lamprophyres are sources of -chromite, but that these indicators can be distinguished from hypabyssal diamond indicator chromites.

7.3.2 Samples l and 2 contain 8 and 11 picritic ilmenites and one chromite with good (indicative of diamond bearing kimberlite) hypabyssal chemistry. These are encouraging indicators of up-ice diamond or hypabyssal sources. The known magnetic anomaly in Deep Lake is a candidate source.

7.3.3 The only other diamond indicators are picritic ilmenites in samples 4 and 8. SEM checks indicate probable crustal sources.

7.4 Sample contamination by slag and metal particles produces no spurious indicators to detract from results, but does make indicator mineral picking and identification more tedious.

citdsamp.r


8.0 ACCOUNTING

8.1 Accounts for this program are set out in Appendix C. 14 samples were taken from three separate blocks of contiguous claims. The accounts should be apportioned to the three contiguous claim blocks according to the number of samples, in the ratio 2:2:10.

9.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE AUTHOR

9.1 This survey was completed under the general direction of Roy. J. Rupert. The report was written by Roy J. Rupert.

9.2 Roy J. Rupert's Qualifications are as follows:

9.2.1 Roy J. Rupert is a Professional Engineer, registered with Professional Engineers of Ontario, Reg. no. 40084014

9.2.2 Roy J. Rupert has been employed in the mining industry in various capacities since 1956, and in a. professional capacity as a geologist or geological engineer since 1963.

9.2.3 Roy J. Rupert graduated in 1966 from McGill University's Mineral Exploration course with the degree of M.Se.(App.)

9.2.4 Roy J. Rupert graduated in 1963 from Queen's University's Geological Engineering program with degree of B.Se.(App.)

Signed this 16 h day of February, 1996

citdsamp.r

APPENDIX A



SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS

citdsamp.r

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES TILL SAMPLING ON CITADEL PROPERTY

SAMPLE NO. l

STREAM SEDIMENT, LOCAL TILL REWORKED BY BEAVERS

96 LBS DRY52 LBS THROUGH 1/8" APERTURE SCREEN

COARSE FRACTION: 2" angular to very angular and slabby fragments. Dominantly porphyritic dacite. Aprox. 5% qtz vein material and vuggy (jubilee bx) gtz spar. J.5% gabbro as slabby chips. 'LO% roots, sticks. l pee. mafic rock with resistant net- textured cement on joints. Cindery appearance. Saved for thin- section, l pee. l" diam. massive talc with phlogopite. No BIF.

FINE FRACTION: 3 PAILS blu-brown sand. 5*3; mica content. Estimate 40% organic particle count. Cut to 1/4 of original, SHIPPED 27.5#

SAMPLE NO. 2

LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, REWORKED LOCAL TILL.

COARSE FRACTION: Subangular to subround. 10** subround eg granitic cobbles. 70^ pebbbly subangular dacite porphyry. <5% gabbro. 10?; diabase pebbles to cobbles. 5 * rotten leached carbonatised fragments, no obvious exotics.

FINE FRACTION: gREY SAND, F TO MG. Negligible mica, some sparry white fragments. Cut to 1/4, SHIPPED 42.5#. Not much organic material.

SAMPLE NO. 3

PROGLACIAL VALLEY TRAIN SEDIMENTS.127 LBS DRY76 LBS THROUGH SCREEN

COARSE FRACTION: Subrounded to moderately pebbly gravel, with +2 0 sand clots. Subrounded and moderately sorted pebbly gravel with sand layers to 2" wide. Sample was poorly screened. Rescreeened. *3(^ granite pebbles. 30% chert and felsic volcanics. No obvious basalt.diabase. Not local provenance, no exotics

FINE FRACTION: Pale yellow-brown sand. SHIPPED 35.5#

DSAM1201.R

SAMPLE NO. 4

LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT. LOCAL REWORKED TILL? fe VALLEY TRAINSEDIMENT.120 LBS DRY.92 LBS SCREENED

COARSE FRACTION :503; subangular to subround dk. massive basal t/andesite. 20?; granite. 10?; roots/twigs.

FINE FRACTION: Dark grey salt and pepper apearance. 10% sparry calcite/feldspar. Not much obvious mica. SHIPPED 45.5#

SAMPLE NO. 5

98 LBS86 LBS SCREENED

LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, LOCAL REWORKED TILL?

COARSE FRACTION: Unsorted subangular to subround. 35% granite. 30?; felsic volcanic. ^0?; mafic intrusive/volcanic/diabase

FINE FRACTION: 3 pails eg well sorted sand. Noticeable sparry white content, reflects proximity of firesand Carb? SHIPPED 36. 5#

SAMPLE NO. 6

LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT DERIVED FROM LOCAL TILL.

COARSE FRACTION: 25?; granite pebbles to 1.5", 503; angular eg crystal grains. granitic. 15?; fine pebbles felsic and mafic volcanics.

FINE FRACTION: Poorly sorted fg to eg. sand. Mainly feldspar and gtz., some mica. SHIPPED 27.5#

SAMPLE NO. 7:

C HORIZON SOIL DEVELOPED OVER LAMPROPHYRE DYKE EXPOSED TO FRESH DENSE BLACK ROCK IN 1987. CRUMBLY RUSTY COLORED MATERIAL, READILY DISAGGREGATED.

"503; Through screen first pass, ^5?; Through screen after trampling under boots. SHIPPED 21.5#

DSAM1201.R

SAMPLE NO. 8

DESCRIBED BY SAMPLER AS TILL FROM ROADSIDE CUT.

COARSE FRACTION: 40% granite pebbles. 3C^ mafic greenstone chips. +20% felsic volcanics.

FINE FRACTION: damp brown sand. Sample not well dried before screening. SHIPPED 25#

SAMPLE NO. 9

POOR SAMPLE SITE. STREAM SEDIMENT WITH TOO MUCH ORGANIC CONTENT.

COARSE FRACTION: Organics Would not pass screen. Peat. Not much mineral soil. A few vocanic pebbles and chips

FINE FRACTION: ^03; Organic particle count, perhaps 15*3; by weight. f g to eg. sand , minor spar. SHIPPED 27#

SAMPLE NO. 10

STREAM SEDIMENT. REWORKED TILL?

COARSE FRACTION: 40* granite/felsic volcanic fragments. 20* hb rich amphi bo l i t i sed basalt indicates local derivation.

FINE FRACTION: Sand, medium grey salt and pepper. Considerable sparry white grains, mainly f 'spar. SHIPED 12#

SAMPLE NO. 11

SEDIMENT AT MOUTH OF STREAM INTO LAKE. MODERN SAND DERIVED FROM VALLEY TRAIN MATERIAL, AND BEAVER DAM OVERFLOWS. SAMPLERS NOTED SOME HEAVY MINERAL SEGREGATION.

COARSE FRACTION: None.

FINE FRACTION: Dark brown-black sand. High organic content. Sparry carb, and feldspar. SHIPPED 25#

SAMPLE NO. 12

SAME AS 11

FINE FRACTION: noticeable biotite and calc-spar content. SHIPPED 31.5#

DSAM1201.R

SAMPLE NO. 13

STREAM SEDIMENT, REWORKED BY BEAVERS. SOURCE IS LOCALLY DERIVED GROUND MORAINE TILL.

COARSE FRACTION: 60% chips or slabby dacite porphyry schist. J.5% chips or angular to subangular granite. 15% organic fragments, twigs. 80* of coarse fraction is fine pebbles.

FINE FRACTION: Too much organic. Wash sample. SHIPPED 27.5#

SAMPLE NO. 14

LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, REWORKED TILL

COARSE FRACTION: Fine pebbly grit. round to very angular rock fragments. Some soft friable leached rock fragments, lamprophyre. High mica content in fines sticking to pebbles.

FINE FRACTION: Low to medium mica content. Too much organics? SHIPPED 19.5#

DSAM1201.R

SAMPLE NO. l STREAM SEDIMENT, LOCAL TILL REWORKED.

SAMPLE NO. 2 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, REWORKED LOCAL TILL.

SAMPLE NO. 3 PROGLACIAL VALLEY TRAIN SEDIMENTS.

SAMPLE NO. 4 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT. REWORKED TILL? Si VALLEY TRAIN SEDIMENT.

SAMPLE NO. 5 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, LOCAL REWORKED TILL?

SAMPLE NO. 6 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT DERIVED FROM LOCAL TILL.

SAMPLE NO. 7: WEATHERED LAMPROPHYRE.

SAMPLE NO. 8 TILL

SAMPLE NO. 9 STREAM SEDIMENT, high ORGANIC CONTENT.

SAMPLE NO. 10 STREAM SEDIMENT. REWORKED TILL?

SAMPLE NO. 11 MODERN SEDIMENT AT MOUTH OF STREAM, SAND

SAMPLE NO. 12 SAME AS 11

SAMPLE NO. 13 STREAM SEDIMENT, REWORKED TILL, LOCAL.

SAMPLE NO. 14 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT, REWORKED TILL, LOCAL

DSAM1201.R

APPENDIX B



ANALYTICAL RESULTS

citdsamp.r

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITEDMr. Roy RupertConsulting Geologist 1496 Wellington Street East Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2R1

January 16, 1996

cc Citadel Gold

Dear Mr. Rupert:

Re: KIMs in Samples C-95-01 to 14, Wawa

We have completed our heavy mineral processing and kimberlite indicator mineral search on the above samples of glacial sediments and modern alluvium. Our lab data sheets are attached.

It is clear that the sediments are representative of their surroundings. Evidence for this includes: 1) abundant gold grains (especially in Sample 07 with 70 grains); 2) abundant chalcopyrite in the first half of the sample series (not recorded on our data sheets); 3) abundant andradite and blue anatase in many samples (both minerals believed to derive from lamprophyre dikes although they also occur in the Currie Rose dyke which may be kimberlite); and 4) abundant mill steel and slag from past mining operations. Sample 07 is enriched not only in gold grains but also in pyrite, siderite and hematite indicating that the subjacent bedrock is mainly iron formation rather than the lamprophyre you mentioned in your December 04, 1995 correspondance.

Unfortunately, the samples contain very few KIMs despite the fact that most were oversized 010 kg). No pyrope is present. A couple of chromites were found but neither Is visibly kimberlitic (resorbed). One is from Sample 07 above your lamprophyre dyke; it contains an ovoid diopside inclusion indicating a crustal rather than mantle source. Four samples yielded picroilmenite but this mineral is not in itself kimberlite-diagnostic as it occurs in the Currie Rose dyke without any accompanying pyrope or other KIMs.

We are a little perplexed at the poor results given that Tom Morris had previously outlined a nice dispersal train complete with G-10 pyropes in Trout Creek on you property. When testing your magnetic targets, you may have stepped out too far from Tom's anomaly. Although the Currie Rose and Nicholson dykes are magnetic, geophysics doesn't seem to have been of any help in finding them.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Yours/Sincerely,

i//Mines Are Where WEFind Them. 1 07-15 Capella Court Nepean, Ontario K2E 7X1 Tel. 613-226-1771 FAX 613-22o-8753

S.A. Averill President

\

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED 107-15 CAPELLA COURT, NEPEAN, ONTARIO, K2E 7X1

TELEPHONE: (613) 226-1771/1774 FRX NO.: (613) 226-8753

DATA TftANSMITTAL REPORT

DATE: l5-Jan-96

ATTENTION: ROY RUPERT

CLIENT: CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. 150 SIGNET DftlvE MALTON, L'N M9L 1T9

CGPY TO: ROY J. RUPERT 4 ASSOCIATES In9b UELLlNGTGN STREET EHST SflULT STE. MARIE, ON

2R1

FAX NO.:

PROJECT: C-95

FILE NO: CIRRUflK.WRI

NO. OF SAMPLES:

to

THESE SAMPLES HERE PHOCLSStD FOR: VISIBLE GOLD GRAINSKIMBERLITE INDICATORS

SPECIFICATIONS:^'HEAVY LIQUID SEPARATION SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 3.20 ALL GOLD GRAINS ISOLATED IN CONICAL VIALS. ALL -250 MlCftON HMC SENT FOR ANALYSIS.

^ ALL SAMPLES PICKED FOR INDICATOR MINERAL GRAINS. XJPLL OTHES SMMPLE FRACTIONS ARE PRESENTLY STORED.

\ YJ.M L^'J^V\Reny Hureault Laboratory

OVERBURDEN DRILLING WNRGEflNl LIMITED - LPBCRATCRY Sfi"?LE LOG: ABBREVIATIONS TP5LE

DATA LOG Clast:

Size of Clast:6: GranulesP: PetblesC: CobblesBL: Boulder ChipsBK: Besrock Chips

X Clast Coiposition:V/S: Volcanics and SedimentsGR: GraniticsLS: LuestoneOT: Other Lithologies

(Refer to Footnotes) Tfl: Only Trace Present NA: NOT APPLICABLE OX: Oxidized

Matrix:S/U: Sorted or Unsorted SD: Sand l F: Fine

ST: Silt l a: Kedka CY: Clay l C: Coarse OR: Organics

Y: Fraction Present*: Fraction relatively aare abundant-: Fraction relatively less abundantN: Fraction Not PresentL: Luips Present

Colour:B: Beige PP: PurpleGY: Grey PK: PinkGB: Grey Beige OC: OchreGN: GreenGG: Grey Green L: LightBN: Bronn 14: HediuiBK: Black D: Dark

GOLD LCGNuiber of Grains:T: Nuiber Found on Shaking TableP: Nuiber Found by Panning

Thickness:C: Calculated Thickness of

Grain (in ncrons) 11: Actual Measured Thickness

of Grain (in ncrons)

Reiarks:* Percentage of HflC (estuate

froi panning of table concentrate)

gr. Grains (estnaled nuiber) uM Microns (1/1000 li)

py. Pyritecpy. Chalcopyriteaspy. Arsenopyrite arc. MarcasiteL/G Liianite/Goetnitesid. Sicerite

HIM LOGGP: Purple garnet (G9/G10 chroie pyrape)GO: Cra-.ge lantle garnet; ir-ckaes tatn eclogitic IG3) and Cr-pssr lejacryst !.S:.'G2)

varieties; in soae saipies, tay include a fen grains of coiior, crustal garret(G5) lacking diagnast:c inci.sions or crystal faces.

DC: Cf-roie di:ps:de, ?ie--ali ;rs;n; pale' jreen lcw-C- diopside picked separ;:el/. li: Picrcilienite; in sose saipies, tay include a fen grains of canon crus:i.

iliente lacking diagnostic :nciusi:ns or crystal faces.

CITADEL GOO NINES INC. - C-95 01/15/96

8QLO CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE GOLD FROM SHAKING TABLE AND PAWING

CIRRI JAN. UR2TOTAL 1 OF PflNNINBS 9

MEASUREMENTe/iiJi* r i DfiUCD3f^WLC V rW^UI

Y/N DIAMETER

C-9525 X 7525 X 10025 X 12550 X 5050 X 7550 X 10050 X 12550 X 15050 X 17575X 7575 X 12575X 200

100 X 150100 X 200

fi N 25X 2550 X 100

9 Y 15 X 2550 X 5050 X 12575 X 150

(NICRONS)

THICKNESS

10 C13 C15 C10 C13 C15 CIB C20 C22C15 C20 C27 C25C29C

5C15 C

4C10 C18 C22C

10 N NO VISIBLE GOLD

11 N 25 X 50

12 Y 15 X 2525 X 5025 X 7550 X 5050 X 7575 X 100

13 Y 25 X SO

BC

4 CBC

10 C10 C13 CIB C

ac

NUMBER OF GRAINS

RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NON CflLC V.6.

TPTPTP GNSPPB REMARKS

22261 1

1 11 1

14492 21 11 1

1 12 2

1 11 1 2

1 11 1

70 151.3 205

1 11 1

2 106.0 6

1 1 No sulphides.1 1

1 11 1

4 57.6 58

1 1

1 114.8 1

1 1 No sulphides.1 1 21 11 1 211 13

1 1

10 195.9 15

1 12 (0. 1* pyrite.

PA6E3 CITADEL BOLD MINES INC. - C-95 01/15/96

GOLD CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE 60LD FROM SHAK1N6 TABLE AND PANNIN6

CIRR1JAN.UR2TOTAL t OF PANN1NBS 9 ———————————————————

MEASUREMENT (MICRONS) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NON CALC V.6. SAMPLE t PANNED

Y/N DIAMETER THICKNESS

NUMBER OF GRAINS

GMSPPB REMARKS

C-95SO X125 X

25 X50 X50 X50 X50 X75 X75 X

100150

50507510012575125

15 C27 C

ec10 C13 C15 C18 C15 C20C

1

11111

1 1

4 22.5 206

2211111

No sulphides.

9 11.5 410

page l CITflOEL GOLD MIXES INC.: ROY RUPERT — C-95 Ol/

OVERBURDEN DRILLING SANflGERENT LIMITEDLABORATORY SfitfLE LCS

KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL COUNTSUl/15/%PROJECT: C-95TOTftL OF 14

SAMPLENUMBER

C-95

123456789

10H121314

SfitftES

TABLE CONCENTRATE (1.0 li (grais)

M.I. SEPARATION S. S 3.20

TOTAL

547.1463.0542.6442.5411.3535.0256.5414.2441.8764.8

1118.0848.9421.7334.3

-0.25li

NfiNANAKANANANAKANANANANANANA

M. I. TOTfiL 0.5 TOLIGHTS NON-KfiS 1.0 ci

361.1 185.3 5.6346.8 115.7 3.7365.5 153.5 2.4233.0 199.1 3.1251.7 134.3 0.9285.5 186.4 3.1104.5 151.3 1.7271.2 106.0 6.6371.9 57.6 2.7723.5 40.4 5.2983.8 114.8 8.7651.9 195.9 5.9397.0 22.S 1.5321.1 11.5 0.7

0.25 TO0.5 H

22.68.9

10.086.765.5

109. 37.4

32.17.8

20.334.428.75.61.9

-0.25 i

157.1103.1141.1109.367.974.0

142.267.347.114.971.7

161.315.48.9

TOTALKA6

0.70.5

23.610.425.363.10.7

37.012.30.9

19.41.12.21.7

KIM COUNT

0.5 TO

6P 60

0 00 00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0

1 II

DC IM

0 60 H0 00 70 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 0

10.25 TO10.5 ii

CR GP

1 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0

DC

00000000000000

T !0TAL

KINs

9H070012000000

PflGE l CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. — C-95

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANftGEMENT LIMITED

GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY SHEET

01/15/96

CIRR1JAN.WR2

Sample Nuiber of Visible Gold Grains Non-Mag Calculated PPB Visible GoldNO. ————————————————————————————————————————————

Total Reshaped Modified Pristine

C-951234567a91011is1314

54432970

S.401

1049

10132511201010

232003B1200603

211001

630000436

weignt —————————————————————————— Total Reshaped Modified Pristine

185.3115.7153.5199.1134.3186.4151.3106.057.640.4114.8195.922.511.5

135128351681205

65801

15206410

1014351629

10

5401040

1247000

1130640070

41

131400

421730000a

202369

Page l CITJADEL SOLD MINES IfC.: ROY RUPERT - C-95 Ol/:

OVERBURDEN DRILLINS MANAGEMENT LIMITED LABORATORY SAMPLE LOG

01/15/96 PROJECT: C-95 TOTAL OF 14 SAfflES. FILENAME: CIRR1JAK.XR1

CLASTS

SAMPLENUMBER BULK

REC'VED

C-951 12.602 19.553 16.204 20.155 16. 106 13.007 9.758 11.609 5.5510 12.2511 11.5012 13.6013 12.2514 8.65

WEIGHT

TABLESPLIT

12.6019.5516.2020.1516.1013. CO9.7511.605.5512.2511.5013.6012.256.85

(KILOGRAMS)

*2 H

CLASTS

2.551.002.050.450.051.550.450.700.050.200.050.052.250.25

1-2 liCLCSTS

2.201.653.102.600.402.401.052.600.455.100.200.402.351.35

TABLEFEED

7.8516.7011.0516.9015.659.058.25d. 305.056.9511.2513.357.657.25

S IZE

PPPGGGGPPPPP66

)2.0

SfiHPLE DESCRIPTION

•i MATRIX

PERCENTAGE

V/S

1001C*40bO353020606010510

100100

6R

006040657060404090959000

LS

00000000000000

OT

NAt®NANANANANANANANANANANANA

(1.0

6RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIGN

S/U

SSSSSSSSSSssss

SD

F, MF, MMMM

F,HFMH

M.CF,"F,MM.CM.C

ST

YYY--Y4Y--YYNA-

CY

Y-Y-NAY4

YY-----

•i

COLOUR0 R6

SAND CLAY .

6666DC66BB

neeBBBBB66GG

BKBKOCBKNABHOCDOCBKBNBNBNBNBN

YYYYYNNMNNNNYY

CLASS

SAND+SOILSANDSANDSANDSANDSAND

SAND+SOILSANDSAM)SANDSANDSANDSANDSAND

PAGE l CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. - C-95 01/15/96

GOLD CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE GOLD FROM SHAKING TABLE AND PANNING

CIRRUAN.HR2TOTAL l OF PANNIN6S

SAMPLE l PANNED Y/N

NUMBER OF GRAINS

C-95l Y

2 Y

3 Y

4 N

5 N

6 Y

7 Y

J3 1 —— " ——————————————— - 11

MEASUREMENT (MICRONS) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NON CflLC V.6.* - - - -- tiff CKQOV

DIAMETER THICKNESS TPTPTP GMSPPB REMARKS

25 X50X50 X75X

50 X75 X75X

100 X

25 X75 X

75 X125 X

75 X75 X

25X50 X50 X50 X75 X75 X

100 X150 X

15 X15 X15 X25 X25 I

5050

100125

7575

100175

25ISO

100175

75125

5075

10012575

150125200

1525502550

BC10 C 115 C20 C

13 C15 C18 C27 C

se22C 1

18 C 229 C 1

15 C 120 C 1

8C 113 C 115 CIB C15 C 122C 122C 134 C

3C4 C7Cseac

2 2 Tr. anatase1 Tr. tourmaline

1 1 Tr. rutile1 1

5 185.3 13

1 11 11 11 1

4 115.7 51

2 21 2

4 153.5 28

21

3 WU 35

11

2 134.3 16

1 1 chroiite observed.1 211

1

9 186.4 81

1438 The pristine gold is very pristine3 1 4 (weathered out of sulphides).235 90* L/Gj l* urcasite

1 15 4 202 1 3

Page l CMflDEL GOLD M1NLS INC.: ROY RUPERT — C-95 O

PROJECT: C-95

01 0.5-1.0 arc contains 2* black andradite (probably frosla-prophyre) and trace tourmaline resembling chroaite; SEM check ^t best CR candicat es - 2 T i andraait e, l cnrc-ite (very gcco chemistry). ftiso picked l blue anatase 0.5-1.0 an, others present 0.25-0.5 na. Froa 0.25-0.5 mn, picked 5 octahedral and 2 ci-bic perovskite candidates (others present), SEM z 5 perovskite and ci n icbian perovskite- respectively, and 3 PEG low/ very low DC.

02 SEM check froa 0.5-1.0 am: *? poor IM candidates (protaslecrustal) = 2 perovskite, 2 crustal ilnenite; 3 blac* splendant glassy grains with brownish coating = 3 Ti andradite. Also picked l blue anatase from 0.5-1.0 no.

03 ^5'A of 0.5-1.0 CiTi fraction consists of diabasic rocK cmp-; (brown clinopyroxene int er grown with feldspar laths -r m inor olivine and ilmenite.

04 SEM checks froa 0.5-1.0 am: b black splendant grains iprooaoie crustals) = l IM, 2 Ti andradite, 3 crustal ilmenite; checked fro -i same fraction b additional black splendant good IM candidates = b IM. From 0.25-0.5 on checked l emerald green chroae grossular candidate = chroae grossular * quartz and l of 2 paler eaerald green low DC candidates ^ l low DC. Picked froa 0.5-1.0 m a o ne pseudocubic perovskite.

05 Mineral grains show significant streaa wear. Picked l pale eaerald green low/very low DC 0.25-0.5 aa.

OS SEM c.-.ecu froa 0.5-1.0 aa: l reddish orange GP canadidate(concoidal fracture) - l Mg almandine and l black splendant chromite candidate = crustal ilnenite. Picked 3 pale eneraid green very low/low DC 0.25-0.5 DU.

07 Concentrate ccn-iists nainly of oxidized pyrite, heiatite and siderite froa ir^cn formation anc rustec steel f ra i iimng operations. Picked l pale eaerald green low/very ic^ DC 0.25-0.5 .lin. SEM cne^ o. 5-1. 0 im l black grain re ;e-!Di i~g cnro.iittf - c nru.Tiite cut contains an ovoia aiopsice I'ciusicr. suggesting crustal origin.

08 SEM check fran 0.5-1.0 i3.ii: 2 poor IM candidates = 2 crustal ilmenite. Picked fro.! o. 5-1.0 aa l very low/ low LI.

09 Concentrate contains abundant rustea steel ara nir.cr- slag frorioperations.

10 Concentrate contains abur.Gant rustea steel froa .mr.ir.g operat ions.

11 Picked froa 0.25-0.5 aa 2 pale eaerald green ve-y l c .-/lew DC.

12 Concentrate contains atur.cant rusted steel and .mn;?- ^.lag from

APPENDIX C



ACCOUNTING

citdsamp.r

ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATESCONSULTING GEOLOGISTS

1496 WELLINGTON STREET EAST SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO, P6A 2R1

Ph. or FAX (705) 946-8546

1996-01-17G.S.T.# 129800769 INVOICE NO. CIT0712.A

CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. 150 SIGNET DRIVE WESTON, ON M9L 1T9 Attn: Mr. J. Sadowski

INVOICE

For Exploration Services, re Wawa Diamond Claims

Soil sampling project.Time charges as listed on page 2 5838.50

Expenses for supplies, as listed p.2 732.71

Expenses for travel, listed p. 2 1101.56

TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES $7672.77G.S.T. @ 7% 537.09

TOTAL AMOUNT PAYABLE $8209.86

cit0117.A

SAMPLING TIME CHARGES

Date R.G.Reid A. Plackitt A. Green R. Rupert

SeptSeptSeptSeptSeptOctOctOctOct.OctOct.Oct.Oct.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.

1617232430010203101112131417182829

4.08.08.01.08.08.08.0

1.02.04.02.04.0

3.0 5.0 8.0 1.0

8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0

58.0 66.0 17.0

8.04^012.0

Total hrs 153 @ $300/8Contract labourExpense acct RGReid, wk of Nov. 18

Carried to page l

EXPENSE ACCOUNTS

Supplies: RGREid R. Rupert

Oct. 15 Sept. 30 Dec. 2

Manitoulin transport. Dec. 2

Carried to page l

Travel:RGReid, Week of Sept. 30 A.Plackitt, Sept. 30

Oct. 7 Oct. 14 Oct. 21 Dec. 2

A.Green Sept 16Sept. 23

Carried to page l

RecceSample Deep LLeroy SamplingLamp. SampleLeroy, Ward SampleScreenDeep L ScreenScreenTravelScreenScreen, Reed LMove samplesDry, screenSample prepSample prepSample prep,desc.Sampl desc

$5737.5

100.00

5838.50

452.54 109.83 11.79

207.19

12.6576.80128.43212.67175.21257.2750.00

200.00

(27.65) (6.72) (0.72)

(13.55)

(0.77)0.00(0.87)(4.91)(0.33)(4.59)0.000.00

732.71

1101.56

citOH7.A

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED1O7-15 CAPELLA COURT, NEPEAN, ONTARIO, K2E vxi

TELEPHONE: (613) 226-1/71/1774 FAX: (613) 226-875J

TO: MR. .-.OY RUPERT

CITA.EL GOLD MINES INC. 150 -^IGNET DRIVE MALT';N, ON M9L -T9

JATE O2-F?b-96

-XE: C-95 Ol to 14

INVC CE - O196104

-ons sitingAver.

Labo atory1 .

1

31

KIM :

pann hrs. samp. SEM c SEM t pages

Services :-11, S.

Services :processing V nga ( 1st 2O VG) (3 panning * >20 VG ) @ e disposal tf •heck, 1st grain/sample @ heck, adc . grains/sample

: FAX trar smieeion @

51faU. 520. 535. 51.

312. 56. 51.

00 GO OO 60 00 GO 00

lib.

2. 24O.iao.7O. 14. 72.

192. 11.

OO5116. OO

00 OO OO OO 00 OO 00

3. S. on O. D.M. se rvices 2O2.65

rOTA INVO CE G.S.T. (registration No. R 1O4O3O812)

INVO CE TO" AL

52, 779. OO

6202.65

S3,O97.65

Stua t Avejill Pres dent

BIL. C* LADING - NOT NEGOTIABLE l CONNAISSEMENT - NON NEGOTIABLE MANITOULIN TRANSPORT MC. - LAKEHEAO FREKJHTWAYS INC - JET TRANSPORT LTD. MANITOULM TRANSPORT U.S. INC. - ALARY TRANSPORT INC. - QUEBEC EXPRESS INC.

Carandga519*534321

GcJvobor 5C7-824-2424

706-3624311

Namdtaard 705*47-6881

Sutuy70SS2-4703

2-25T-1333

-LTStffc.

807-2294551

Bey

Date* Ckydan FJotLeka Fort Frances GerakHon313481-7334 807-937-2400 1-8004630862 807-274-3144 807-8544)711

Kapuskasxg LskMri UOaCurrant London705-3354585 519-291-4700 705-368-2512 519685-7229

No* Bay Orta Ottawa705-476-1333 7053254251 613-7364902

Tinunns Toronto705-267-7987 9056704962

613-7354961 8*797-1317

705456-2260 519-972-8333 204-7662451

SHIPPER l EXFrDITEUR CUSTOMER : :0e CODE OU C. i -~

:A14E'NOM

, J. .

^'VILLE f

^^ /V&CONSIGNEE/ CONSIGN/ TAIRE CUSTOMER : :CE l

CODE DU C. EN- P

OX1RESS/AORESSE -W tr

'Ls(.cay

:rrvviLLE

'•tfi^

STICKER

5325105

Declared Valuation Valeurdeclaree

afton staMaamuin kabMy or S2.00 per pomd unless declared ^ResponsaoMe maoamum de S2 OQ/fevre a mons cf rrtcadon contraire

ROUTING l ROUTE

C/ ^RIER/TRANSPOR'EUR TRANSFER POINT lTRANSFERT

' (PIECES ' PIECES

PART' XILARS OF GOODS. MARKS AND EXCEPTIONS DESCRIPTION DES MARCHANOISES MARQUES ET PARTICUIARITES

DANGEROUS GOODS PROD. OANGEREUX CLASS PIN

WEIGHT POOS

FREIGHT CHARGES FRAIS OE TRANSPORT

-^ aL PREPAID l PORT PA YE

COLLECT l A PERCEVOIR

Freight charges wH be cotect unless marked prepaid.Lea frais seront a percevoir a moinsd'aviscontraire.

SHIPPER: PLEASE COMPLETE/THE FOLLOWING V EXPEOITEUR: S.V.P. REMPLJR CE OUI SUITTOTALNO OFPECES NOM8RES TOTAL OE CODS

D)f4ENSIONSOFSHa?*JENT l CTMCOTIOOT DU CHARCEMEMTLENGTH/LONGUEUR WOTh/LARGEUR HEIGHT/HAUTEUR

TOTAL CUBC FEET TOTAL PEDS CUBES

TOTAL WEIGHT POOS TOTAL

DMEN9ONAL WEIGHT/ POPS PMOtaONNEL *

1. Any agreement covering transportation of the goods i writh other than due dtepatch, or forspecmcUme.rroistbeenAxsedonthteblcrflaolrflandslgnedbytherjarteshen'to.

2. When a shipment is at owner's risk, the words 'At Owner's Risk" must be entered and Hbatod by both parties

1. Toute ententes speciale concemant te transport des biens deerite ct-haut, sot heure speciale de ivratoon ou autre, dot etre nfequte sur ce connaissement et signee par tes partis concemes.

2. S ta merchandise est expedite au risque de Pexpidleur. tes mots -Au risque de rexpedteuT doivert etre inserts et rtbalesâr tes deux parts concemes.

i COD FEE PREPAID

RUUSC.O.D AMOUNT l MCMTANT PAYES D" AVANCE

9 |LJ CO.D. FEE COLLECT ___________l FRAS C.O.O.

APERCEVORC.OX). chafga* wi be oatod untan marked prafNid./ LMfrafeC.O-D.Mfontapercevoir d mcww (fflwto oonlraire. ________

CARRIER/ Q Mantouin Transport Inc. Q Manitoulin Trampert US.Inc. TRANSPORTEUR Q LafcrttMd FrwghMMys Inc. QMaiyTfamportlnc.

Q M Transport Ltd. Q Quebec Express Inc.

UNCRATED MERCHANDISE AT OWNER'S RISK l TMS &LL Cf L A^NG TO SE •~'~-fD 9V SHIPPER *\C 11 7 3 E^

PER:^^^ ^ ^ .^.-.-- - .^ .^ NOTE: MARCHANDtSENON^MBALLEEAvOSReQUES r CE CONNAISSEMENT

rC-'T EÊ S'"'-: - '3 L EXPEOITEUR ET LE ÂNSPORTEVJI.

J

CHECKER CONTRdLEUR

r? i

l#M*#fsfHMAAr 7?.

LEGEND

SAMPLE LOCATION NUMBER

J CLAIM BOUNDARY

HIGHWAY OR IMPROVED PUBLIC

i ACCESS ROAD,NOT MAINTAINEDv

2.1645 8ROY J. RUPERT 6 ASSOCIATESCITADEL GOLD MINES INC.

DIAMOND INDICATOR MINERALS SURVEYSAMPLE LOCATIONS

OF RECENT GLACIAL SEDIMENTS

Sampling by:RGReid,APlackitt,AGreen Plan By: RJRupert

SCALE; 1:31680 1 96-2

CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. MCMURRAY TOWNSHIP PROPERTY

MINING RIGHTS OWNED BY CITADEL

COMPILATION DATE, JUNE 1994 BY ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATES

MILES

ra- mmsJ m mm

FIGURE 94-1


PATENTED MINING RIGHTS OWNED BY CITADEL

COMPILED MAY 1994 BY ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATES

MILES

F] URE 94-2


CROWN MINING RIGHTS LEASES OWNED BY CITADEL

COMPILATION DATE, JUNE 1994 BY ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATES

MILES

i fr-'-t^ ' : ': :: : : :::i fc&Sq/ fe g;;;* mtf-

FIGURE 94-3


UNPATENTED STAKED MINING CLAIMS OWNED BY CITADEL

COMPILED MAY 1994 BY ROY J. RUPERT AND ASSOCIATES

MILES

FIG-JRE 94-4

Ministry ofNorttiem Development ne Mines

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

NO.

Ontario

ersonal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. Trtismfonnationwin be used for corresjxxidence. Questions aooul is collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Devetoprnentan4Jfines. Fourth Floor. 150 Cedar Street. jdbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264. *

istructtons: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for reqr

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed- Technical reports and maps must accompany th- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assign-

f5

41N15NE0030 2 16458 MCMURRAY 900Cltont No.

T0tepnono No.^/z ?0M or 6 Plan No.rownsMp/AreT"itagbMeton'

7 f.Frem: To:

irk Perfonned (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup

| Geotechnical Survey

1 Physical Work. Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

^,* W*# /b*'**T**S*Sy'V* 0*7^**.

SECTION 18 ONLY

0s r a ^*r

l Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs

:: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit an or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

on* and Survey Company Who Perfonned the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

HECE/VED

l a schedule If neceesary)

cation of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sideMMNG LANDS

fy that at the flme the work was performed, the claims covered in this work were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest ! current recorded holder.

Rocordad HoMer or (Signature)

cation of Work Reportly that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after notation and annexed report is true. Td AddrssTi

fi

t'

U

\\N

8

fir

/t

iCM

ti*

! Vallue

ned m laim

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please Indicate from which claims you wish to prkxize the deletion of credits. Please mark (x) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be Implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respec to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l cet.fy that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest m the patented ( Date

DOCUMENT NO.E^? - *o±L

CITADEL GC . - MINES INC

ir , i \\j\v r-UT* . GNC' 'iDiCATGR SAMPLING

1996/01/07 3OY J RUPERT AND ASSOC

1996/02/02 OVERBURDEN DR[L'-- l'-ANAGEMENT

1996^)2/16 ^OY j RUPERT AND

TOTAL

S7.672.77

J52.779.pu

S90000

51 1 351 77

l

ASSESSME'.~ WORK DlSTRIBUTlCr.

PATENTED CLAIMS 2/14 DEEP LAKECUKIM "2/^4 REED LAKE CLAIM BLOCK 10/14

51.621.68"S1.62r68S810841

Sil.351.77

RECEIVED

FEB261996 -,-.v

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Pagef

OntarioMinistry of Ministeredu Geoscience Assessment Office Northern Development Developpement du Nord 9 33 Ramsey Lake Road and Mines et des Mines gth Floor

Sudbury, OntarioP3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

May 16, 1996Our File: 2.16458 Transaction #: W9650. 00015

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development t Mines60 Church StreetSault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 3H3

Dear Ms Lessard:

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDIT ON MINING LAND, CLAIMS S8M. 1110154 i 1110155 IN MCMURRAY TOWNSHIP

Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission. The credit has been approved under Section 17, Assays, of the Assessment Work Regulation.

The approval date is May 16, 1996.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome at (705) 670-5858.

Yours sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:/-XRon C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

LBJ/jlJ cc: Resident Geologist Assessment Files Library

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Sudbury, Ontario

TRIK .

TOV/NSHI? OFCH'BANEI 4 **.

DOCUMENT NO.W9650 MCMURRAY

(TWP. 29 R.

DISTRICT ALGOMA

SAUIT STE.MINING DiV^JION

SCALE: 1-INCH- 1O CHAINS

LEGENDPsrr'-X^~-* * *.©LO l*i i1:". ~/ •.ci-* Vwici-^j

eJ3LIS14*•-——l—l J! T M, j*^ 3M ;SSM o"93LS|MfX6}l069? B

Sl'RRkC*- RIGHTS ONLY64700 \C470I

9191 l 3192 l (D \ O i* OVt . ROADS liiHWAYS

l* ^--.-— J\ Vf..

1163345^ !'"\^ J \^^pscai-X eJ

NOTES

-ea sw 199*

J.-Lf SSM

Ordv No. OM Otap^tHtor

63865

18/01/68 SRO 18855^M BIOHT8

SSM-24/94 30/06/94 S 8 M W6HTS |c,5 | 50

•7/ *T /' (MMA II63C43 J7*8*.^•r^-l^

f45l9Ha gnat i r Bearina

5. Annual t /C!

RABAZO TWP. NAVE A s.' T W . MiniStryof Su- 'eys and

Natural

rpt on diamond indicator sampling on prop of citadel gold mines … · 2017-01-17 · diamond...

Documents