---.- .. .. ........ .••IIII 11111*1 III42AB8NE0104 2 .5514 M ICHAUD 010

Report on a Magnetometer Survey

on Four Claims Michaud Twp.

Larder Lake Mining Division

RECEIVEDtmr -SOBS

UNOS SECT.ON

C.S. Bruce March 30/83

INTRODUCTION

A magnetometer survey was carried out March 15/83 on four

claims in Michaud Township, Ontario, Larder Lake Mining

Division.

PROPERTY AND ACCESS

The property is located in Michaud Township in Lot 10,

cone. Ill, fifty-six miles east front Timmins. Access is

from highway 101 through Matheson to one mile past Perry

Lake, the bush road south to the property.

PROPERTY .

Four unpatented mining claims in Michaud Township numbered

568519, 568520, 610567 and 610568.

OWNERSHIP

Four claims were staked by Falconbridge Ltd. and transferred

* to Garrison Creek Consolidated Mines Limited. The claimsl

were subsequently optioned back to Falconbridge Limited.

PREVIOUS WORK

In 1946 the claims were held as part of a group, by Dunmar

Mines Ltd. A total of five holes were drilled for cross-

-2-

sectional purposes in 1946-1947. Only low grade to nil

values were obtained on assayed core. In November 1981,

a VLF electromagnetic ground survey was carried out by

Falconbridge Ltd.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

One outcrop of granite occurs in the central portion of

the claim group. The drilling by Dunmar Mines shows

syenite, syenite porphyry, basic syenite, granite, lam-

prophyry and andesite. The local relief is low to moder

ate, generally covered sand dunes, eskers, swamp and some

boulder till.

LINECUTTING

A base line was run across the property and picket lines

were established every 400' with station every 100' along

picket lines. Readings with the magnetometer were taken

every 100'. A total 4.3 miles of lines and baselines were

cut.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

The magnetometer survey was carried out -by* C. S. Bruce and

I.R. Morrison. The magnetometer survey was done using a

Barringer proton magnetometer model GM-122. It has a range

from 20,000 gammas to 99,999 gammas with an accuracy of li

gamma. The sensor is a omnidirectional noise cancelling

. X 3

-3-

toroidal sensing head. The instrument can be operated

from -40 0C to *55Oc with relative humidity from O to

The magnetometer operates on the principle that if a

proton rich fluid is placed into a magnetic field the pro

tons will align along the magnetic field vector. A magne

tic field is induced in the sensor then suddenly removed.

Protons which behave as elementary gyroscopes will start

precessing around the remaining magnetic field - that of

the earth. The precession frequency is directly propor

tional to the magnetic field of the earth. The magneto

meter counts this frequency, divides it by one appropriate

constant to obtain a reading in gammas and displays the

reading in the form of a 5 digit number. Base stations

were established on each line, and correction for diurnal

drift were made to these base stations. '

DISCUSSION OF GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS

The two main magnetic features from the property are re

presented as a small strong magnetic high, located in the

southeast corner of the claim group which possibly represents

a small intrusive plug. A north south linear feature located

on the western half of the property, represented by a moder

ately high magnetic feature possibly represents a possible

diabase dyke.

CONCLUSION

The magnetic survey failed to pick up any coincident anomalies

with the five VLF anomalous areas.

C.S. Bruce

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Colin Scott Brace, of 421 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ontario, do

hereby certify that I am a graduate of Lakehead University as a geologist

in 1981. I have been practising my profession in Canada since 1978.

I further certify that I have no direct interest in this claim group

and the accompanying report is based on the interpretation obtained during

the geophysical survey of the property.

C. Scott Bruce

MiniatryofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Type of Survey(s)

a Cf O C"fo rv-4 e "f

The M 42A8BNE8184 2.5514 MICHAUD

i wmisMip or Mrea

900

Claim Holder(i)

G? o.rr-i C.r*i e. A/Li /tesProspector's Licence No.

Addret*

Survey Company

MDate of 8urvey (from tt to)A~ 3 /*a lDay l Mo. l *Vr? l Day l Mo. l Yr.

Total Mile* of lin* Out

Name end Address of Author (of Qeo-Technlfcal report)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right

r?"

W

t

Special Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological - ~

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometrjc

Pays perClaim

2-0

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

ixpenditures (excludes power stripping)Type Of Work Performed

Performed on Clalm(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total

Totel Expenditures Days Credits

JS - -h J15 1 ^

Instructions Totel Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Recorded Hcrtder or Agent (Signatur

Certification Verifying Report of Work1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts tet forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

362 (81/9)

Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural R ftn0rtResources PO"

Ontario Approval

Mining Lands Comments

mir'"'W: -

fr

QComment!

t'.jjQ^Cpproved |~) With to tee egaln with correctioni

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comment!

Approved [~| Wish to tee again with correctioniDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

t

r t-Bf?-'

Commentt

^Approved Q With to tee again with correctionsSignature

ft '

| |lo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

18*3(81/10)

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

MagnetometerType of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s) Garrison Creek Consolidated

Survey fVimpany F a 1 rnnhr i rige T. i m-i t o ri

Author of Report C.S. Bruce ——..Address of Author 167 Wilson Avenue. Timmins Covering Dates of Survey M a T- nh i 5/a 3—-^^—^^^-—

Total Miles of Line Cut.(linecutting to office)

4.3 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey,ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

20

—Radiometric—-OtherGeological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. .Radiometric(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications y ̂Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lilt numerically

15J rprefix)

.fc56.?.5,20...............(nvnber)

*kV*T*n*V*nrf •••••*t***tt**t***********i***t**t*'**t***i***

L610566

•m

i

MC1IYID

TOTAL CLAIMS—l

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval ——Profile scale.———.

220

100

Contour interval. 100 gamma

.Number of Readings 220 JLine spacing______400

r' y

o

Instrument. R a y y i n rt or fSM - 1 9. 2 PyifhnnAccuracy — Scale constant —i—l—gamma Diurnal correction method Bagp.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value -

1 h o 11 r

]4d*nnu T.24RF. 143+nnM T.252E L256E14H-OON, L260E 143"fOON. L264 142-H)ON. L268E 140+OON, I.272E 137400N

5

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —— Accuracy ————— Method:

Parameters measured.

CH Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line Q Parallel line

(ipecify V.L.F. station)

2Ol

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

z

12 uiQ b

g2

iluK

Instrument ____~ Method D Time Domain Parameters — 6n time ———

"K-Offtirne j,-— Delay time ———— Integration time,

Power —Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

O Frequency Domain _ Frequency _____ _ Range ^-,————

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument————— Range.Survey Method.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument———Values measured.Energy windows (levels). Height of instrument.—. Size of detector^———Overburden ——^-^——.

.Background Count.

(type, depth - Include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) . Type of survey—————————————————————— Instrument ———————————————————————— Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ———— Instrument(s) —————

Accuracy———————

Aircraft used.Sensor altitude.

(specify for each type of survey)

(tpecify for each type of lurvey)

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude.Miles flown over total area.

.Line Sparing

.Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample-

Mature of Material) Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————Terrain^——————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

Da a

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others________________________Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ^-^—————.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, tcreening, crushing, aihing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis-^-^—

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method—— Reagents Used————.

.tests)

-tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

L. 568519

2.5514

1983 06 01

Mr. George J. Koleszar rMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP. 0. Box 984K1rN and Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

. ' ' , ' t.tr , ' '

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Magnetometer) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Parf omanee and Coverage) on mining Claims L. 568519 et al In the Township of Michaud.

This material will be examined .and assessed and a statement of assessment work credit! will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E, F. AndersonDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

• t, "i' .A. Barr:emcc t Garrison Creek ConsolIdated Mines Ltd.

cc: C. Scott Bruce

i- 'CANADA 50 \ CANADA 50A CANADA 50

r

-145 + 00 N

- 135+OON

140+OON

-130+0 ON

-I27*OON

58600

BASELINE

LJCO

LJU)

UJo

NACCESS ROAD

E .- F.M",[ r-. , SAND RIDGE

CKtEK

"l/ S WAMP , WET AREA

DAM

C. \ W D OST

A BASE STATION

58700 R EADING IN GAMMAS

PROPERTY MAP

MARCHAUD f OPTION

Scale ' l" s 4mi

LOCATION MAP

FALCONBRIDGE NICKEL MINES LTD.

MARCHAUD OPTIONMICHAUD TOWNSHIP

t

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYScale ' l" - 200'

100' 200' 400'

Dote of Survey jyigrchi 15^, 1933

N.TS. 42 A 8/9Survey By C .S. Bruce/ I.R. MorrisonDrawn By -- R L .L , C .S. Bruce

42AC8NE01814 2,5514 MICHAUD 200