rosalyn j. moran wellcome trust centre for neuroimaging

32
Rosalyn J. Moran Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 1 st Workshop on the Free Energy Principle, ION, UCL, July 5 th 2012. Precision in Cortical Message Passing

Upload: inoke

Post on 24-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Precision in Cortical Message Passing. Rosalyn J. Moran Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 1 st Workshop on the Free Energy Principle, ION, UCL, July 5 th 2012. Outline. Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Rosalyn J. Moran Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging

1st Workshop on the Free Energy Principle, ION, UCL, July 5th 2012.

Precision in Cortical Message Passing

Page 2: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Outline

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions

Hypothesised Neuronal Implementation & the role of Neuromodulators - Gain effects on primary neurotransmission

Cholinergic Neuromodulation & Certainty Effects on Auditory mismatch negativity - Theoretical simulation of perception

Testing Cholinergic Neuromodulation - DCM characterization of Event Related Responses

Page 3: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Outline

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions

Hypothesised Neuronal Implementation & the role of Neuromodulators - Gain effects on primary neurotransmission

Cholinergic Neuromodulation & Certainty Effects on Auditory mismatch negativity - Theoretical simulation of perception

Testing Cholinergic Neuromodulation - DCM characterization of Event Related Responses

Page 4: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle

Hierarchical, Dynamic & Uncertain causes in the environment generate sensory signals

Different Levels of the hierarchy and/or different sensory signals may confer more precise Information

Page 5: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

The Environment

Hierarchical, Dynamic

Page 6: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

The Environment

Hierarchical, Dynamic & Uncertain causes generate sensory signals

y y

Page 7: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

The InversionEstimate: Hierarchical, Dynamic & Uncertainty of sensory signals to minimise the surprise of the sensory signals

y y

Minimise Free Energy

)),|(||)(()|)(()()|)(()(

)|)(()|(

)|(ln)|()|(

mypqKLmtyptFmtyptF

dtmtypmyH

dymypmypmyH

Minimise SurpriseTime averaged Surprise(Ergodicity)

Minimise F at every point in time

The Brain’s Response to y… A Tractable Problem

States, parameters & noise

Page 8: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Outline

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions

Hypothesised Neuronal Implementation & the role of Neuromodulators - Gain effects on primary neurotransmission

Cholinergic Neuromodulation & Certainty Effects on Auditory mismatch negativity - Theoretical simulation of perception

Testing Cholinergic Neuromodulation - DCM characterization of Event Related Responses

Page 9: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Minimising Free Energy

The Laplace Assumption: The brain assumes gaussian random fluctuations

)),|(||)(()|)(()( mypqKLmtyptF

y

Gradients a function of error terms weighted by the precisions at each level:How might precisions be encoded?

Smooth noise correlations within levels Markov properties between levels

1 5 1015200 25

1 5 1015200 25

1 5 10 152025

Page 10: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Gradients of Free Energy Precision Dependent

y

A multiplicative term that stays within levels:Candidate mechanisms: local lateral inhibition & neuromodulators

Forward prediction error

Backward predictions

Superficial pyramidal cells

Deep pyramidal cells

Perceiving multiple hierarchical levels together: errors can have a greater or lesser effect

Page 11: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Gain control at superficial pyramidal cells y

Neuromodulators: Anatomically deployed to provide input in multiple regionsEg Sarter et al. 2009

Local Glutamate & GABA

Long Range Glutamate

Diffuse projectionsNeuromodulatorsAcetylcholineDopamine

Page 12: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Gain control at superficial pyramidal cells yNeuromodulators: Physiologically equipped to provide gain control

Cholinergic Projectionsfrom BasalForebrain

Dopaminergic Projections from VTA/SNc

Activity at D1 receptorsstimulates adenylyl cyclasemodulating postsynaptic currentsActivity at muscarinic receptors

enhances EPSPs through K-current modulation

Page 13: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Gain control at superficial pyramidal cells yNeuromodulators: Physiologically equipped to provide gain control

Cholinergic Projectionsfrom BasalForebrain

Dopaminergic Projections from VTA/SNc

Presynaptic terminals

Excitatory (AMPA) receptorsModulatory receptorInhibitory (GABAA) receptors

Dendritic spine

errorprecision Precision-weighted error

Page 14: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Outline

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions

Hypothesised Neuronal Implementation & the role of Neuromodulators - Gain effects on primary neurotransmission

Cholinergic Neuromodulation & Certainty Effects on Auditory mismatch negativity - Theoretical simulation of perception

Testing Cholinergic Neuromodulation - DCM characterization of Event Related Responses

Page 15: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Framework

7 Auditory Stimuli:Pure tones presented in mini-blocks

time

Freq

Mismatch Negativity ~150 ms

Under Placebo & Cholinergic Enhancement

Simulate Experiment

Recognition Dynamics

Page 16: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

v1

x1 x2

There was a particular

sound

The sound has dynamics determined

by properties, Frequency and

Amplitude

Sensationsy~

Recognition Dynamics

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Sensory Data

Page 17: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

A two level hierarchytimeFreq

v1

x1 x2

Sensationsy~

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Sensory Data

C =4

Page 18: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

A two level hierarchytimeFreq

v1

x1 x2

Sensationsy~

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Sensory Data

C = 2

Page 19: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

timeFreq

Sensationsy~

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Inversion: assume different precision estimates

Placebo

ACh

Page 20: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

timeFreq

Sensations

y~

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The Recognition Dynamics under different precision estimates

Placebo

ACh

Time (msec) Time (msec)

Simulated ERP Placebo Simulated ERP ACh

Prec

ision

wei

ghte

d PE

0 50 100 150 200 250 300-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 50 100 150 200 250 300-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

d1d2d10

Page 21: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:The MMN itself under different precision estimates

Time (msec) Time (msec)

Simulated ERP Placebo Simulated ERP ACh

Prec

ision

wei

ghte

d PE

0 50 100 150 200 250 300-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 50 100 150 200 250 300-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

d1d2d10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Prec

isio

n we

ight

ed P

E

Simulated MMN Placebo Simulated MMN ACh (more Precision)

CertainEnvironmentUntil oddball

More CertainEnvironmentUntil oddball

Tone is predictedTone is predicted

Page 22: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Outline

Predicting & Estimating Precision under the Free Energy Principle - Laplace and Mean Field Assumptions

Hypothesised Neuronal Implementation & the role of Neuromodulators - Gain effects on primary neurotransmission

Cholinergic Neuromodulation & Certainty Effects on Auditory mismatch negativity - Theoretical simulation of perception

Testing Cholinergic Neuromodulation - DCM characterization of Event Related Responses

Page 23: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Testing error precision modulation by Acetylcholine:

7 Auditory Stimuli:Pure tones presented in mini-blocks

time

Freq

Mismatch Negativity ~150 ms

Under Placebo & Cholinergic Enhancement

Real Experiment

Page 24: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Scalp Effects: MMN

Recorded MMN Placebo

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5 *

chan

nel C

21

*

Recorded MMN Galantamine

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Prec

isio

n we

ight

ed P

E

Simulated MMN Placebo Simulated MMN Galantamine (more Precision)

CertainEnvironmentUntil oddball

More CertainEnvironmentUntil oddball

Tone is predictedTone is predicted

Page 25: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Physiological & Hierarchical PredictionsRecall:

Forward prediction error

Backward predictions

Superficial pyramidal cells

Deep pyramidal cells

A multiplicative term that stays within levels:Candidate mechanisms: neuromodulators

Page 26: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Forward (Bottom-up) ConnectionBackward (Top-Down) Connection

IFG

A1MTG

IFG

A1 MTG

What layer? What region?

Acetylcholine: Where does it affect network processing?

( )x

( )x

( )v

( )v

Spiny stellate

Deep pyramidal

Superficial pyramidalInhibitory interneuron

Backward connections

Forward connections

Gain Modulation at Supragranular Pyramidal Cells

Gain Modulation at Deep Pyramidal Cells

Page 27: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Acetylcholine: Where does it affect network processing?

Forward (Bottom-up) ConnectionBackward (Top-Down) Connection

IFG

A1MTG

IFG

A1 MTG

What layer? What region?

Forward (Bottom-up) ConnectionBackward (Top-Down) Connection

IFG

A1MTGIFG

A1MTG

simple neuronal model

Slow time scale

fMRIcomplicated neuronal model

Fast time scale

EEG/MEG

),,( uxFdtdx

Neural state equation:

Hemodynamicforward model:neural activityBOLD

Time Domain Data

Electromagneticforward model:

neural activityEEGMEG

LFP

Time Domain ERP Data…

Neural Mass Model

DCM

Page 28: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Acetylcholine: Where does it affect network processing?

Forward (Bottom-up) ConnectionBackward (Top-Down) Connection

IFG

A1MTG

IFG

A1 MTG

What layer? What region?

Forward (Bottom-up) ConnectionBackward (Top-Down) Connection

IFG

A1MTGIFG

A1MTG

( )x

( )x

( )v

( )v

Spiny stellate

Deep pyramidal

Superficial pyramidalInhibitory interneuron

Backward connections

Forward connections

DCM for ERPs : Canonical Microcircuit

Page 29: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Acetylcholine: Bayesian Model Selection

Forward ConnectionBackward Connection

Model 3IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

Model 1

MTG

Model 2IF

GM

TG 1A

IFG

A1

MTG

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

MTG MTG

A1

Model 5 Model 6

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG MTG MTG

A1

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

Model 7 Model 8IF

GM

TG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

Model 9 Model 10

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

IFG

MTG A1

IFG

A1

MTG

Model 3 Model 4

Intrinsic Modulation (models 1-6); Extrinsic Modulation (models 7-10)

Rela

tive

Log

Mod

el E

vide

nce

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M60

200

400

600

800

1000

∆F = 153

M7 M8 M9 M10

IFG

Page 30: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

( )x

( )x

( )v

( )v

Spiny stellate

Deep pyramidal

Superficial pyramidalInhibitory interneuron

Backward connections

Forward connections

Gain Modulation at Supragranular Pyramidal Cells

In A1

Acetylcholine: Direction of Gain Modulation

Placebo

ACh

Mod

ulat

ory

Effe

ct o

f Gal

anta

min

e

Superficial Pyramidal Cell Gain

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

PlaceboBaseline

Galantamine

*

Page 31: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Summary

Precision estimates enable Bayes optimal perception - Hierarchical inference enables different precision effects at different

levels- Precision estimates control the impact of errors in Free Energy

minimisation under the Laplace Assumption

Neuromodulators are anatomically & physiologically equipped to signal precision in this scheme

Neuromodulatory systems could control precision at different hierarchical levels

Cholinergic Neuromodulation controls gain in superficial pyramidal cells in early sensory regions; conforming to Free Energy Predictions of enhanced precision on sensory prediction errors

Page 32: Rosalyn J. Moran  Wellcome Trust Centre for  Neuroimaging

Thank You

Karl FristonRay DolanKlaas Enno StephanMkael SymmondsNicholas WrightPablo CampoMethods GroupEmotion Group

Acknowledgments