rosa navarrete-rueda department of informatics and computer science national polytechnic school...

42
OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ACCESS TO LEARNING FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN Rosa Navarrete-Rueda Department of Informatics and Computer Science National Polytechnic School (Ecuador) Sergio Luján-Mora Department of Software and Computing Systems ESCUELA POLITÉCNIC A NACIONAL

Upload: ethan-gibson

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ACCESS TO

LEARNING FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN

LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN

Rosa Navarrete-RuedaDepartment of Informatics and Computer Science

National Polytechnic School (Ecuador)

Sergio Luján-MoraDepartment of Software and Computing Systems

University of Alicante (Spain)

ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA NACIONAL

Oportunities◦ UNESCO recognize the current relevance of

Open Educational Resources (OER) to widen education at all levels.

◦ There is a global conscience about rights of people with disabilities.

Problem◦ The barriers that restrict access for people with

disabilities to non-formal learning in web based environments.

Context

The premises The problem The proposal The evaluation/Results Discussion and future work

Content

Perspectives: ◦Website: Limited number of OER websites that

offered content in Spanish language (prevalent language in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries), and quite a few of them have accessibility barriers for people with disabilities.

◦Contents: The educational resources have accessibility issues.

The problem

Verify in some important websites the availability of OER which:◦ Meet accessibility criteria, ◦ Their contents are in Spanish language and,◦ Their contents are designed for an educational

level equivalent to upper high-school. In order to recommend their use for self-

learning and teaching support in LAC countries

The proposal

The websites for analysis should have contents:◦ In Spanish language (prevalent language in LAC

countries),◦ Appropriate for an educational level equivalent

to upper-high school as minimum.

The proposal

Websites for selection

WEBSITE NAME URLSpanish content

High school level or greater

ARIADNE - European Knowledge Pool System

http://www.ariadne-eu.org/ No Yes

Commonwealth of Learning http://www.collor.org/col/ No Yes

ConneXions http://cnx.org/ No YesExploratorium Digital Library http://www.exploratorium.edu No Yes

HEAL: Health Education Assets Library

http://www.healcentral.org/index.jsp

No Yes

Illumina: National Science Digital Library

http://www.ilumina-dlib.org/ No Yes

MERLOT http://www.merlot.org/ No YesMIT Open Courseware http://ocw.mit.edu/ No YesNSDL National Science Digital Library

http://nsdl.org/search/ No Yes

OER Commons http://www.oercommons.org/ Yes Yes

Open Courseware Consortium http://www.ocwconsortium.org/ Yes Yes

Open Learning Initiative (OLI) Carnegie Mellon

http://www.cmu.edu/oli/ No Yes

Tufts Open Courseware http://ocw.tufts.edu/ No YesUniversia OCW http://ocw.universia.net/ Yes YesWisconsin Online Resource Center

http://ideas.wisconsin.edu/ No Yes

OER Commons http://www.oercommons.org

Yes Yes

Open Courseware Consortium

http://www.ocwconsortium.org/

Yes Yes

Universia OCW http://ocw.universia.net/ Yes Yes

The proposal

Accessibility on the

home page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resources OER Accessibili

ty

1

2

34

5

Issues considered for the evaluation proposal

The proposalAccessibility on the home

page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resourcesOER

Accessibility

1

2

34

5

1. Accessibility on the home page of the website.

◦ Home page is the first interface for the user, so must be accessible to enable the retrieval of educational resources.

◦ Evaluation was based on WCAG 2.0, through automated tools.

The evaluation

1. Accessibility on the home page of the website

◦ WCAG 2.0 has been developed by W3C.◦ It has been adopted in most international

legislation about web accessibility.◦ It is a referenceable technical standard of 2008,

based on a set of success criteria that are not technology-specific.

◦ It has12 guidelines organized under 4 principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable and Robust.

◦ Conformance levels: A, AA both are mandatory, AAA is desirable.

The evaluation

1. Accessibility on the home page of the website

◦ Automated tools for evaluation: ◦TAW (Web Accessibility Test) is based on WCAG,

gives a number of problems detected according to conformance level.

◦Achecker produces a report of all accessibility problems for the selected guidelines.

The evaluation

The evaluation consider the conformance WCAG 2.0 level AA which is mandatory.

The evaluations results (1)

WEBSITE NAME

URLTAW AChecker

Perceivable OperableUnderstandabl

eRobust Known Likely

Potential

OER Commons

http://www.oercommons.org/

7 20 2 4 292 0 438

Open Courseware Consortium

http://www.ocwconsortium.org/

15 4 2 1 15 0 226

Universia OCW

http://ocw.universia.net/

3 4 1 28 17 2 198

Home pages in all websites analyzed have accessibility issues, especially for visual disabled people.

The proposalAccessibility on the home

page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resourcesOER

Accessibility

1

2

34

5

2. Search facility◦ Verify if the searching interface includes

refinements criteria about resources, like: educational level subject or topic, format, language, accessibility features.

◦ And, if the searching criteria could be used with boolean operator “and”.

The evaluation

The evaluation results (2)

* Not as search criteria but as a link on the website

WEBSITE NAMESEARCH CRITERIA  

Educational level

Subject FormatLanguag

eAccessibility

featuresAnd

operator

OER Commons Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Open Courseware Consortium

No Yes No Yes No No

Universia OCW No Yes No Yes * No No

The evaluation results (2)

Language

OER Commons

Format

Level

Subject

Accesibility

OER Commons

This website admits the use of boolean operator "and" with different search criteria.

OER Commons Not all the resources

reported for Spanish language actually correspond to this language.

In some cases, when the search included "Accessibility" features, did not get any results

This website does not admit the use of boolean operator "and" with different search criteria.

Criteria

OCW Consortium

Open Courseware Consortium

The searching by language or Category delivers a list of courses without any order.

OCW Universia

This website does not admit the use of boolean operator "and" with different search criteria.

Criteria

Language

The proposal

Accessibility on the

home page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resources

1

2

34

5

3. Features of the website Highlight the features of the website that foster

or hinder accessibility in the website itself and also in the available resources.

The evaluation

OER Commons◦ Content providers are almost a thousand of

institutions and organizations, it doesn’t have direct participation from universities.

◦ The website improves the user experience with some options over the web interface.

◦ The website provides accessibility information about the resources.

The evaluation results (3)

OCW Consortium ◦ Content providers are associated universities

around the world.◦ Links to individual resources lead to each

university's OCW page.◦ The website does not include information about

accessibility

The evaluation results (3)

Universia OCW◦ Content providers are universities associated

from many countries around the world.◦ The website provides an option in menu bar for

language and areas, authors, keywords and universities.

◦ The website does not include information about accessibility

The evaluation results (3)

The proposal

Accessibility on the

home page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resources

1

2

34

5

4. Universities involved◦ We evaluated qualitatively the awareness of

accessibility in the universities involved in the websites analyzed.

The evaluation

OER Commons◦ The resources came from Connexions Collection

and GeogeBra Institution. ◦ There were not universities involved.

The evaluation results (4)

OCW Consortium ◦ There were 12 universities from Spain, and only

3 universities from LAC countries, with available resources in Spanish language.

◦ We only considered the universities with an active OCW site.

The evaluation results (4)

Universia OCW◦ We considered only universities from LAC

countries that appear as providers. ◦ Some OCW sites from universities involved were

not available at the date of this research, and many others mentioned in the project does not had resources available.

The evaluation results (4)

The proposal

Accessibility on the

home page

Search facility

Features of the website

Universities involved

Accessibility of the

resources

1

2

34

5

5. Accessibility of the resources◦ This evaluation tests accessibility criteria in the

resources of the OCW site. Web pages: automated evaluation tools Non-text resources: alternative formats Portable Document Format (PDF): tagged file. Verify if resources meet accessibility criteria

for visual and auditory disabilities.

The evaluation

OER Commons

The evaluation results (5)

Resource format

Meet Accessibility criteria Comments about resources

Visual Auditory

Web Pages Yes Yes

Resources on literature theme presented through web pages, meet accessibility criteria. Description about resource is in English language.

Video, animation No YesNo captions for videos. No alternative format for non-text resources.

PDF files No YesThe PDF files reviewed don´t meet accessibility criteria

OCW Consortium

The evaluation results (5)

University

(Hyperlink to OCW site)

Home Page Accessibility

Number of resources

Resource format Accessibility of

Resources

Web pages

PDF files Visual Auditory

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Accessibility issues 197 Yes Yes Yes Yes

Universidad de Alicante

Meet accessibility criteria

211 Yes Yes Yes Yes

Universidad de SevillaMinimal Accessibility issues

220 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Politécnica Madrid

Minimal accessibility issues

102 Yes Yes Yes Yes

Universidad del Valle - Colombia

Accessibility issues 11 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad de Monterrey - México

Accessibility issues 40 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Estatal a Distancia – Costa Rica

Accessibility issues 12 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Particular de Loja - Ecuador

Minimal accessibility issues

14 Yes Yes No Yes

The evaluation results (5)

OCW Consortium◦ The previous table only shows the universities

from Spain, with the major number of resources and those universities that belong to LAC countries.

◦ Some important universities have educational resources suitable for people with visual and auditory disabilities, but not the entire contents of an specific course meets accessibility criteria.

◦ The universities from LAC countries correspond to Colombia, México, Costa Rica y Ecuador, and those resources do not meet accessibility criteria.

Universia OCW

The evaluation results (5)

University

(Hyperlink to OCW site)

Home Page Accessibility

Number of resources

Resource format Accessibility of

Resources

Web pages

PDF files Visual Auditory

Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (Argentina)

Accessibility issues 60 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Anáhuac (México)

Accessibility issues 46 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad de Monterrey (México)

Accessibility issues 30 Yes Yes No Yes

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile)

Accessibility issues 21 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad de Chile (Chile)

Accessibility issues 25 Yes No No Yes

Universidad del Valle (Colombia)

Accessibility issues 11 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Icesi (Colombia)

Accessibility issues 6 Yes Yes No Yes

Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería (Perú)

Accessibility issues 26 Yes Yes No Yes

The evaluation results (5)

Universia OCW◦ The previous table only shows universities from

LAC countries that not already evaluated.◦ All universities have accessibility issues, and

the resources are not suitable for visual disabled people.

◦ The number of available resources is still low.

Discussion and future work

Preliminary study Limited number of OER websites with content in Spanish language.

Universities from Spain surpass the universities from LAC countries in accessibility awareness.

Discussion and future work

Improve the actual situation in this matter in LAC countries requires the commitment of governments and universities.

Future research would be valuable to establish a more accurate and thorough assessment of the availability of resources in areas of specific knowledge.

OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ACCESS TO LEARNING

FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN

Rosa [email protected]

Sergio Lujá[email protected]@sergiolujanmora

ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA NACIONAL