risk management goals and tools. role of risk manager n monitor risk of a firm, or other entity...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RISK MANAGEMENT
GOALS AND TOOLS
![Page 2: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ROLE OF RISK MANAGER
MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY– IDENTIFY RISKS– MEASURE RISKS– REPORT RISKS– MANAGE -or CONTROL RISKS
![Page 3: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
COMMON TYPES OF RISK
MARKET RISK CREDIT RISK LIQUIDITY RISK OPERATIONAL RISK SYSTEMIC RISK
![Page 4: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
COMMON TOOLS
SCENARIO ANALYSIS– ASSESS IMPLICATIONS OF PARTICULAR
COMBINATIONS OF EVENTS– NO PROBABILITY STATEMENT
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS– FIND PROBABILITY OF LOSSES– HOW TO ASSESS EVENTS WHICH HAVE
NEVER OCCURRED?
![Page 5: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MARKET RISK PORTFOLIO STANDARD DEVIATION
DOWNSIDE RISK SUCH AS SEMI-VARIANCE
VALUE AT RISK
![Page 6: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Value at Risk is a single measure of market risk of a firm, portfolio, trading desk, or other economic entity.
It is defined by a confidence level and a horizon. For convenience consider 95% and 1 day.
A ny loss tomorrow will be less than the Value at Risk with 95% certainty
![Page 7: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
HISTOGRAM OF TOMORROW’S VALUE - BASED ON PAST RETURNS
0 . 0
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
- 2 0 - 1 5 - 1 0 - 5 0 5
S & P 5 0 0 % R E T U R N S
K e r n e l D e n s i t y ( N o r m a l , h = 0 . 1 1 4 5 )
![Page 8: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-20 -10 0 10
Empirical CDF of S&P500 RETURNS
![Page 9: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Weakness of this measure
The amount we exceed VaR is important There is no utility function associated with
this measure The measure assumes assets can be
sold at their market price - no consideration for liquidity
But it is simple to understand and very widely used.
![Page 10: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE PROBLEM
FORECAST QUANTILE OF FUTURE RETURNS
MUST ACCOMMODATE TIME VARYING DISTRIBUTIONS
MUST HAVE METHOD FOR EVALUATION
MUST HAVE METHOD FOR PICKING UNKNOWN PARAMETERS
![Page 11: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
TWO GENERAL APPROACHES FACTOR MODELS--- AS IN
RISKMETRICS
PORTFOLIO MODELS--- AS IN ROLLING HISTORICAL QUANTILES
![Page 12: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FACTOR MODELS
– Volatilities and correlations between factors are estimated
– These volatilities and correlations are updated daily
– Portfolio standard deviations are calculated from portfolio weights and covariance matrix
– Value at Risk computed assuming normality
![Page 13: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
FACTOR MODEL: EXAMPLE
If each asset is a factor, then an nxn covariance matrix, Ht ,is needed.
LET wt be the portfolio weights on day t Then standard deviation is And assuming normality, VaRt=-1.64 st
Quality of VaR depends upon H and normality assumption.
tttt wHws '
![Page 14: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PORTFOLIO MODELS
Historical performance of fixed weight portfolio is calculated from data bank
Model for quantile is estimated
VaR is forecast
![Page 15: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
COMPLICATIONS
Some assets didn’t trade in the past- approximate by deltas or betas
Some assets were traded at different times
of the day - asynchronous prices-
synchronize these
Derivatives may require special
assumptions - volatility models and greeks.
![Page 16: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PORTFOLIO MODELS - EXAMPLES Rolling Historical : e.g. find the 5%
point of the last 250 days GARCH : e.g. build a GARCH model to
forecast volatility and use standardized residuals to find 5% point
Hybrid model: use rolling historical but weight most recent data more heavily with exponentially declining weights.
![Page 17: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GARCH EXAMPLE
Choose a GARCH model for portfolio Forecast volatility one day in advance Calculate Value at Risk
– Assuming Normality, multiply standard deviation by 1.64 for 5% VaR
– Otherwise (and better) calculate 5% quantile of standardized residuals as factor
Multi-day forecasts: what distribution to use?
![Page 18: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKS
Define hit= I(return<-VaR)-.05 Percentage of positive hits should not be
significantly different from theoretical value
Timing should be unpredictable VaR itself should have no value in
predicting hits TESTS?
![Page 19: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Tests
Cowles and Jones (1937)
Runs - Mood (1940)
Ljung Box on hits (1979)
Dynamic Quantile Test
![Page 20: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Dynamic Quantile Test
To test that hits have the same distribution regardless of past observables
Regress hit on– constant– lagged hits– Value at Risk– lagged returns– other variables such as year dummies
![Page 21: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Distribution Theory
If out of sample test , or If all parameters are known
Then TR02 will be asymptotically Chi
Squared and F version is also available But the distribution is slightly different
otherwise
![Page 22: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Dynamic Quantile Test -SP
Dependent Variable: SAV_HITSample: 5 2892Included observations: 2888Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 0.0051 0.0096 0.5277 0.5977SAV_HIT(-1) 0.0397 0.0187 2.1277 0.0334SAV_HIT(-2) 0.0244 0.0187 1.3051 0.1920SAV_HIT(-3) 0.0252 0.0187 1.3468 0.1781SAV_HIT(-4) -0.0044 0.0187 -0.2370 0.8127SAV_VAR -0.0034 0.0066 -0.5241 0.6002
R-squared 0.0029 Mean dependent var 0.0006Adjusted R-squared 0.0012 S.D. dependent var 0.2191S.E. of regression 0.2190 Akaike info criterion -0.1975Sum squared resid 138.2105 Schwarz criterion -0.1851Log likelihood 291.2040 F-statistic 1.7043Durbin-Watson stat 1.9999 Prob(F-statistic) 0.1301
![Page 23: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Some Extensions
Are there economic variables which can predict tail shapes?
Would option market variables have predictability for the tails?
Would variables such as credit spreads prove predictive?
Can we estimate the expected value of the tail?
![Page 24: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
THE CAViaR STRATEGY
Define a quantile model with some unknown parameters
Construct the quantile criterion function Optimize this criterion over the historical
period Formulate diagnostic checks for model
adequacy Read Engle and Manganelli
![Page 25: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SPECIFICATIONS FOR VaR
VaR is a function of observables in t-1 VaR=f(VaR(t-1), y(t-1), parameters) For example - the Adaptive Model
)(
)(11
ttt
ttt
VaRyIhit
hitVaRVaR
![Page 26: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
How to compute VaR
If beta is known, then VaR can be calculated for the adaptive model from a starting value.
.....)3(
hit no if (-.05)*
1in hit if .95*VaR(1)VaR(2)
1.65VaR(1)Let
VaR
![Page 27: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CAViaR News Impact Curve
![Page 28: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
More Specifications
Proportional Symmetric Adaptive
Symmetric Absolute Value:
Asymmetric Absolute Value:
)VaRy()VaRy(VaRVaR 1t1t21t1t11tt
1t21t101t yVaRVaR
31t21t101t yVaRVaR
![Page 29: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Asymmetric Slope
Indirect GARCH
1t31t21t10t yyVaRVaR
2/12
1t2
21t
10t yk
VaRkVaR
![Page 30: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
REMAINING PROBLEMS
Other Risks, I.e. credit and liquidity risk Derivatives are not easy in either approach
– Approximate by delta and ignore volatility risk?– Simulate and reprice using BS?– Use simulation of simulations– Longstaff&Schwarz clever idea
• one simulation plus a regression.
![Page 31: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
RISK MANAGEMENT
IN MEAN VARIANCE WORLD, RISK MANAGEMENT DOES NOT EXIST AS A SEPARATE PROBLEM, MERELY COORDINATION.
COULD MAXIMIZE UTILITY s.t. VaR CONSTRAINT.
RISK REDUCTION CAN BE A MEAN VARIANCE PROBLEM ITSELF.
![Page 32: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Value at Risk: A Case Study
$1Million Portfolio at a point in time- March 23,2000
Find 1% VaR Construct historical portfolio
– 50% Nasdaq, 30%DowJones,20% LongBonds Build GARCH
– Compute VaR - Gaussian, Semiparametric Estimate CAViaR
![Page 33: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
PORTFOLIO COMPONENTS
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
3/27/90 2/25/92 1/25/94 12/26/95 11/25/97 10/26/99
NQ
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
3/27/90 2/25/92 1/25/94 12/26/95 11/25/97 10/26/99
DJ
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
3/27/90 2/25/92 1/25/94 12/26/95 11/25/97 10/26/99
RATE
![Page 34: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
STATISTICS
NQ DJ RATE
Mean 0.000928 0.000542 0.000137
Median 0.001167 0.000281 0.000000
Maximum 0.058479 0.048605 0.028884
Minimum -0.089536-0.074549-0.042677
Std. Dev. 0.011484 0.009001 0.007302
Skewness -0.530669-0.359182-0.202732
Kurtosis 7.490848 8.325619 4.956270
![Page 35: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CORRELATIONS
NQ DJ RATE
NQ 1.000000 0.695927 0.145502
DJ 0.695927 1.000000 0.236221
RATE 0.145502 0.236221 1.000000
![Page 36: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
HISTORICAL QUANTILE
DECADE OF HISTORICAL DATA:– VaR=$22600
ONE YEAR OF HISTORICAL DATA:– VaR=$24800
WORST LOSS OVER YEAR: $36300
![Page 37: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
3/23/90 2/21/92 1/21/94 12/22/95 11/21/97 10/22/99
PORT
![Page 38: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Value at Risk by GARCH(1,1)
C 1.40E-06 4.48E-07 3.121004
ARCH(1) 0.077209 0.017936 4.304603
GARCH(1) 0.904608 0.019603 46.14744
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
3/26/90 1/24/94 11/24/97
![Page 39: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
CALCULATE VaR
ASSUMING NORMALITY– VaR=2.326348* 0.014605*1000000– $33,977
ASSUMING I.I.D. DISTURBANCES– VaR=2.8437*0.014605*1000000– $ 39,996
![Page 40: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
CAViaR MODEL
MAXIMIZE QUANTILE CRITERION BY GRID SEARCH:
var=c(1)+c(2)*var(-1)+c(3)*abs(y)
c(1) =0.002441
c(2) =0.796289
c(3) =0.346875
![Page 41: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
VaR over TIME
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
3/23/90 2/21/92 1/21/94 12/22/95 11/21/97 10/22/99
VAR_CAVIAR_OPT
![Page 42: RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND TOOLS. ROLE OF RISK MANAGER n MONITOR RISK OF A FIRM, OR OTHER ENTITY –IDENTIFY RISKS –MEASURE RISKS –REPORT RISKS –MANAGE -or](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d575503460f94a367d4/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
CAViaR ESTIMATE
1% VaR is $38,228
This is very plausible - it is worse than the rolling quantiles as volatility was rising
It lies just below the semi-parametric GARCH.