risk factors and prevalence · about-gamblers-anonymous gebauer, l., labrie, r., & shaffer, h....
TRANSCRIPT
Risk Factors and PrevalenceLaura J. Lamb Atchley, PhD, LPC, LADC/MH, ICGC-II
Assistant ProfessorSoutheastern Oklahoma State University
Basic information: gambling and gambling disorderLifetime prevalence rates of gambling disorder in general
populationRisk groups in the general populationResearch on prevalence rates of gambling disorder in
addiction counselorsPredictors of gambling disorder in addiction counselorsSelf-assessment of gambling disorderSteps to mitigate risk of developing a gambling problemSelf-care plan to mitigate your risk of developing a gambling
problem
Any betting or wagering, for self or others, whether for money or not, no matter how slight or insignificant, where the outcome is uncertain or depends upon chance or “skill” constitutes gambling (Gamblers Anonymous International Service Office, 2019).
• Bingo• Card and domino games• Pool, golf, shuffleboard• Lottery and scratch tickets• Casino games (slots, video
poker, table games)• Horse or dog racing• Sports betting• Fantasy & daily fantasy sports• Stock market and day trading• Internet gambling
The American Gaming Association (2019) estimated:
Nearly 90% of US population view gambling as an acceptable form of entertainment.The US casino industry: $261 billion enterprise that supports 1.8
million jobs nationwide.Gaming revenue in 2018 increased 3.5% over 2017 to the highest ever
annual total at $41.7 billion.
Kessler et al. (2008): 78.4% of Americans have gambled in their lifetime.
• Welte et al. (2015): 76.9% of Americans have gambled in past year.
Fun
Exciting
Escape
Socialization
Enhanced self-esteem
For most, it is a harmless activity
For others, it becomes a compulsion that causes financial, relationship, employment, and legal problems.
First mentioned in the medical literature in the early 1880s (Harvard Medical School, 2010).
First theory of gambling disorder: Freud (Custer & Milt, 1985). Related compulsive gambling to compulsive masturbation and unconscious guilt from the Oedipus complex (Freud, 1928/1961). Freud: First to say that gambling was an addiction (Rosenthal, 1987).
But until 2013 it was classified as an impulse control disorder (APA, 2000).
Preoccupation – planning next venture
Tolerance – gambling with increasing amounts of money to get the same level of excitement
Withdrawal – restlessness, irritability when stopping
Escape – relieving stress and or depressed mood
Lying – concealing the extent of gambling to others
Chasing losses – after losing money, returning to “get their money back”
Loss of Control – Unsuccessful efforts to control behavior
Risked significant relationship –personal, job, educational or career opportunity
Bailout – reliance on others to provide money
Persistent and recurrent problematic gambling behavior leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as indicated by four or more of the following:
(Gambling is not better accounted for by a manic episode)
Younger ages
Male gender
Single or divorced marital status
Minority ethnicity
Those with lower socioeconomic status
Those with mental health disorders
Those with substance use disorders including alcohol, illicit drugs, and nicotine
Problem gamblers account for approximately 1/3 of the industry’s revenue (Oei & Gordon, 2008).
Very few national prevalence studies
Results vary significantly based on methodology (Williams, Volberg, and Stevens, 2012).
Assessment instrument (SOGS, DSM, PPGM)Cut scores used to designate problemTimeframe used (lifetime, past year, past week)Survey method (in person, self-administered paper, or self-administered onlineHow the survey is described (gambling survey, recreational activities survey, etc.)
Kessler et al. (2008): Lifetime Level 2: 2.3%Lifetime Level 3: 0.6%
Gerstein et al. (1999): Lifetime Level 2: 1.3%Lifetime Level 3: 0.8%
Shaffer et al. (1999): Lifetime Level 2: 3.85%Lifetime Level 3: 1.6%
Two studies of addiction counselors have found higher lifetime prevalence of gambling disorder than general population
Weinstock et al. (2006)
Lamb Atchley (2018)
Similar findings in both studies
Weinstock et al. (2006)
Self administered survey at a regional workshop for addiction counselors (N = 328). Instruments used: SOGS (cut scores: 0-2 no problem, 3-4 problem, 5+
pathological)Short Form-12v2 Health Survey (Summary scales:
physical health and mental health. Subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Weinstock et al. (2006)
Examined lifetime and past two month prevalenceExplored association between gambling, mental, and physical
health. Findings:Majority of sample (81.7%) were non-problem gamblers
(SOGS = 0-2). Level 2, problem gamblers (SOGS = 3-4) 6.4% of sample Level 3, pathological gamblers (SOGS = 5+) 11.9% of
sample Level 2 and 3 gamblers were more likely to be male and
African American than non-problem gamblers
Weinstock et al. (2006)Findings continued:
Level 3 gamblers were more likely to be older and less educated than non-problem gamblersPoorer physical health, limiting bodily pain, and more
limits in performing physical activities due to health problems was associated with pathological gambling.Mental health was not associated with pathological
gamblingResearchers noted that findings aligned with studies on
individuals with a history of substance use disorders but that factor was not specifically evaluated
Lamb Atchley (2018)
Self administered online survey of addiction counselors (N = 210). Instruments used: SOGS (cut scores: 0-2 no problem, 3-4 problem, 5+
pathological)Self-report questionnaire regarding demographics and
substance use disorder treatment historyRegulatory Mode Questionnaire
Regulatory Mode Theory (Kruglanski et al., 2000) Theory of motivation and self-regulation
Assessment Mode (cognitive) - an individual’s tendency to evaluate options in order to make the right decision in pursuit of a goal. “Do the right thing.” Locomotion Mode (action) – an individual’s tendency to
take action toward a goal. “Just do it!”
Operate independently and vary according to temperament and socialization.
Both are needed for optimum functioning.
Lamb Atchley (2018)Examined lifetime prevalenceExplored extent to which demographic factors, history of
substance use disorder treatment, and regulatory modes predict gambling disorderFindings:Majority of sample (76.15%) were non-problem gamblers
(SOGS = 0). Level 1, non-problem gamblers (SOGS = 1-2) 15.14% of
sample Level 2, problem gamblers (SOGS = 3-4) 2.29% of sample Level 3, pathological gamblers (SOGS = 5+) 6.42% of sample
Lamb Atchley (2018)
Significant predictors of gambling disorder:
History of substance use disorder treatment (consistent with general population research)Female gender (inconsistent with Weinstock et al., 2006
and general population research)Cohabitating marital status Separated/divorced African Americans
Lamb Atchley (2018)
Significant predictors of gambling disorder (continued):
Male/Other Gender X Assessment ScoreFor males, for every 1 point increase in Assessment
Score, mean SOGS score expected to be 4.577 times higher for men as compared to women
No Treatment History X Assessment ScoreFor those with no SUD treatment history, for every 1
point increase in Assessment Score, mean SOGS score expected to be 3.449 times higher as compared to those who have been treated for SUD
Higher lifetime prevalence rates of Level 2 (problem gambling) and Level 3 (pathological gambling) than general population studies.
Higher lifetime prevalence rates of Level 3 (pathological gambling) than Level 2 (problem gambling) unlike general population studies.
These findings suggest that addiction counselors have an increased vulnerability to more severe gambling disorder and that the disorder might escalate faster in addiction counselors than the general population.
All research studies have limitations. Limitations in these studies included:
Small sample sizes
Regional samples – may not be representative of addiction counselor population as a whole
Regions represented could be areas in which there are more gambling opportunities and prevalence rates are higher
Replication is needed to confirm and expand the findings.
Just as it is important to know our risks of health conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, or cancer, it is important to know our risk of developing gambling disorder.
Be honest with yourself about your risk.
Take action to protect yourself.
Brief Bio-Social Gambling Screen (Gebauer, LaBrie, & Shaffer, 2010)
1. In the past 12 months, have you become restless, irritable, or anxious when trying to cut down or stop gambling?
2. In the past 12 months, have you tried to keep your family or friends from knowing how much you gambled?
3. In the past 12 months, have you had such financial trouble that you had to get help from family or friends?
One or more yes answers indicates a likely gambling disorder.
Acknowledge your demographics and history.
Assessment scale (Kruglanski et al., 2000)(See Handout)
What other risk factors apply to you? (family history, age, etc.).
Don’t think of gambling as a way to make money.Always gamble with money that you can afford to lose.Never chase losses.Set a money limit.Don’t gamble when you are depressed or upset.Do not gamble when using alcohol or other drugs.Balance gambling with other activities.
Play sports
Attend sporting events
Go to concerts
Travel (day trips or longer)
Go to spa, nail salon, etc.
Go to amusement, theme, or water parks
Visit outdoor places (parks, lakes, forests, etc.)
Go shopping
Do art, painting, crafts,
Do gardening
Eat out
Read
Visit family or friends
Have family or friends over
Do learning activities
Volunteer
Go to museums
Go to festivals
Explore your city or town
Play board or outdoor games
Cook out
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Gaming Association (2019). State of the states: The AGA survey of casino entertainment. Washington: AGA.
Custer, R. & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out: Help for compulsive gamblers and their families. New York, NY: Facts on File, Inc.
Freud, S. (1961). Dostoevsky and parricide. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, 1927-1931, pp. 173- 196). London, England: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_Dostoevsky_Parricide.pdf (Original work published in 1928).
Gamblers Anonymous International Service Office (2019). Definition of gambling. Downloaded from http://www.gamblersanonymous.org/ga/content/questions-answers-about-gamblers-anonymous
Gebauer, L., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: a brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry(2), 82-90.
Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffman, J., Palmer, A., Chuchro, L., . . . Hill, M. A. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center. http://www.norc.org/pdfs/publications/gibsfinalreportapril1999.pdf
Harvard Medical School (2010). Pathological gambling. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 27(2), 1- 3. https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pathological-gambling
Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). The prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV pathological gambling in the national comorbidity survey replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351-1360. doi:10.1017/S0033291708002900
Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To do the right thing! or to just do it! Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793
Lamb Atchley, L. J. (2018). Regulatory modes and gambling in addiction counselors: A multiple regression study. Retrieved from ProQuest, LLC. (ProQuest No. 10747219).
National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG, 2016). National Survey of Problem Gambling Services. Retrieved from https://www.ncpgambling.org/programs-resources/programs/2016-survey-problem-gambling-services/
Oei, T.P.S. & Gordon, L.M. 2008. Psychosocial factors related to gambling abstinence and relapse in members of Gamblers Anonymous. Journal of Gambling Studies 24 (1): 91–105.
Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rosenthal, R. J. (1987). The psychodynamics of pathological gambling: A review of the literature. In T. Galski (Ed.), The handbook of pathological gambling. Springfield, MO: Charles C. Thomas.
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369-1376. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508762/pdf/amjph00009-0065.pdf
Weinstock, J., Armentano, C., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Prevalence and health correlates of gambling problems in substance abuse counselors. The American Journal on Addictions, 15, 144-149. doi:10.1080/10550490500528449
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., Hoffman, J. H., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2015). Gambling and problem gambling in the United States: Changes between 1999 and 2013. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 695-715. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9471-4
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S. – Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313-337. doi:10.1023/A:1021019915591
Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ontario, Canada: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.