revitalising mood-as-input research: where is the theory and what are the real applications?
DESCRIPTION
Revitalising mood-as-input research: Where is the theory and what are the real applications?. Graham Davey University of Sussex, UK. What is mood-as-input?. The extent to which someone performs a task differs as a function of both their mood and stop rule - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Revitalising mood-as-input Revitalising mood-as-input research: Where is the theory research: Where is the theory
and what are the real and what are the real applications?applications?Graham DaveyGraham Davey
University of Sussex, UKUniversity of Sussex, UK
What is mood-as-input?What is mood-as-input? The extent to which someone performs a The extent to which someone performs a
task differs as a function of both their task differs as a function of both their mood and stop rulemood and stop rule
The same moods can have different The same moods can have different implications for task performance implications for task performance depending on the context or stop rule in depending on the context or stop rule in which the mood is experiencedwhich the mood is experienced
moods convey information as part of a moods convey information as part of a configural processing system configural processing system
Stop RulesStop Rules ‘‘As many as can’ (AMA)As many as can’ (AMA) ‘‘Feel like continuing’ (FL)Feel like continuing’ (FL)
A Configural View of Task A Configural View of Task PerseverationPerseveration
+AMA=
The 2 x 2 DesignThe 2 x 2 DesignMartin, Ward, Achee & Wyer (1993)Martin, Ward, Achee & Wyer (1993)
05
101520253035404550
AMA FL
Negative MoodPositive Mood
Applications to Applications to PsychopathologyPsychopathology
Pathological WorryingPathological Worrying Compulsive CheckingCompulsive Checking Depressive RuminationDepressive Rumination Perseverative DietingPerseverative Dieting Perseverative GamblingPerseverative Gambling
Important ConsiderationsImportant Considerations AMA/NEG or FL/POS configurations?AMA/NEG or FL/POS configurations? Is there evidence for the validity of Is there evidence for the validity of
AMA/NEG combinations?AMA/NEG combinations? What task do we use?What task do we use? Does the task have ecological validity?Does the task have ecological validity? How do we measure perseveration?How do we measure perseveration? What control conditions do we need?What control conditions do we need? How do we manipulate and control mood?How do we manipulate and control mood?
Pathological WorryingPathological Worrying(Startup & Davey, 2001)(Startup & Davey, 2001)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Catastrophising Reverse catastrophising
Interview condition
Mea
n ca
tast
roph
isin
g st
eps Negative mood
Positive mood
Neutral mood
The effect of different stop rules on catastrophising in high & low worriers
(Startup & Davey, 2001)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
As many as can Feel like continuing
Goal instruction condition
Mea
n ca
tast
roph
isin
g st
eps Low worry
groupHigh worrygroup
Perseverative CheckingPerseverative CheckingMacDonald & Davey (2005a)MacDonald & Davey (2005a)
number of checksnumber of checks
020406080
100120140160
FL AMA
Positive Mood
NegativeMood
Perseverative CheckingPerseverative CheckingMacDonald & Davey (2005a)MacDonald & Davey (2005a)
Highest number of rechecks on a single lineHighest number of rechecks on a single line
05
10152025303540
FL AMA
Positive Mood
NegativeMood
Manipulating ResponsibilityManipulating ResponsibilityMacDonald & Davey (2005b)MacDonald & Davey (2005b)
Total time spent checkingTotal time spent checking
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Positive Mood Negative Mood
Low ResponsibilityHigh Responsibility
Depressive RuminationDepressive Rumination(Hawksley & Davey, 2009)(Hawksley & Davey, 2009)
NEGATIVE MOODPOSITIVE MOOD
Experimental Condition
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Mea
n R
umin
atio
n St
eps
Error bars: 95% CI
FLAMA
stoprule
Perseverative GamblingPerseverative Gambling ‘‘continue to play continue to play
until you feel that until you feel that you have done as you have done as well as you can’ well as you can’ (AMA condition)(AMA condition)
‘‘stop playing when stop playing when you no longer feel you no longer feel like continuing’ like continuing’ (FLC condition)(FLC condition)
ResultsResults
Figure 1 . Mean duration of gambling session as a function of stop rule condition and mood induction group.
0123456789
10
Negative Mood Positive MoodMood Condition
95% confidence interval
Mea
n Ti
me
Spen
t G
ambl
ing
(min
utes
)AWAFLC
Stop Rule Condition
Some Critical IssuesSome Critical Issues Are mood-as-input effects robust?Are mood-as-input effects robust? Do all combinations of mood + stop Do all combinations of mood + stop
rule have ecological validity?rule have ecological validity? Are mood and stop rule genuinely Are mood and stop rule genuinely
independent?independent? Why do individuals in an AMA/Negative Why do individuals in an AMA/Negative
Mood condition eventually stop?Mood condition eventually stop?
Are Mood & Stop Rule Are Mood & Stop Rule Independent?Independent?
Negative mood induces higher performance Negative mood induces higher performance standards (Scott & Cervone, 2002)standards (Scott & Cervone, 2002)
Negative mood promotes a more systematic Negative mood promotes a more systematic and deliberate information-processing style and deliberate information-processing style than positive mood (Ambady & Gray, 2002; than positive mood (Ambady & Gray, 2002; Batra & Stayman, 1990)Batra & Stayman, 1990)
Specific negative moods are associated with Specific negative moods are associated with specific appraisals (Tiedens & Linton, 2001)specific appraisals (Tiedens & Linton, 2001)
Intention to Resolve WorriesIntention to Resolve WorriesDavey & MacDonald, 2009, unpublishedDavey & MacDonald, 2009, unpublished
EXPERIMENTAL CONDITION
Neutral Mood Low SaliencyNeutral Mood High Saliency
Cognitive PrimingNegative Mood Low Saliency
Negative Mood High Saliency
INTE
NTI
ON
TO
RES
OLV
E W
OR
RY
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
Error Bars: 95% CI
Endorsement of AMA or FL Endorsement of AMA or FL worry stop rulesworry stop rules
Experimental Experimental ConditionCondition
AMAAMA FLFL
-ve mood/hi -ve mood/hi saliencysaliency
99 33
-ve mood/lo -ve mood/lo saliencysaliency
1010 22
Cognitive Cognitive primingpriming
44 88
Neutral mood/hi Neutral mood/hi saliencysaliency
55 77
Neutral mood/lo Neutral mood/lo saliencysaliency
33 99
Negative Mood & Stop Rules Negative Mood & Stop Rules for Checkingfor Checking
Britton & Davey, 2009, unpublishedBritton & Davey, 2009, unpublished
Why do worriers eventually Why do worriers eventually stop?stop?
Davey, Eldridge, Drost & MacDonald, 2007Davey, Eldridge, Drost & MacDonald, 2007
END OF TASKPRIOR TO TASK
MEAN
AMA
STO
P RU
LE R
ATIN
G
300
200
100
0END OF TASKPRIOR TO TASK
MEAN
FL S
TOP
RULE
RAT
ING
300
200
100
0
Are Mood-as-input effects Are Mood-as-input effects caused by a Mood-as-input caused by a Mood-as-input
mechanism?mechanism? Configural interactions between mood and Configural interactions between mood and
stop rulestop rule Attribution effectsAttribution effects Mood intensity effectsMood intensity effects Cognitive load effectsCognitive load effects Failure to use Objective EvidenceFailure to use Objective Evidence Testing the role of mood information with Testing the role of mood information with
complex stop rulescomplex stop rules Use of specific, discrete negative moodsUse of specific, discrete negative moods AlexthymiaAlexthymia
Mood-as-input and Specific Mood-as-input and Specific Negative MoodsNegative MoodsMeeten & Davey, 2009Meeten & Davey, 2009
Mood conditionNeutralAngryAnxiousHappySad
Mea
n nu
mbe
r of c
atas
troph
ising
step
s 14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Error bars: 95% CI
flam
SR
Applications – Developing a Applications – Developing a Low Intensity Intervention for Low Intensity Intervention for
WorryingWorryingJones & Davey, 2009-11Jones & Davey, 2009-11
Focus Group Sessions:Focus Group Sessions: How do we notice when we’re worryingHow do we notice when we’re worrying The pros and cons of stopping worryingThe pros and cons of stopping worrying Noticing Stop Rules and MoodNoticing Stop Rules and Mood The impact of MoodThe impact of Mood Changing stop rulesChanging stop rules Overcoming BarriersOvercoming Barriers
Concluding ThoughtsConcluding Thoughts Mood-as-input can be applied to Mood-as-input can be applied to
perseveration at a broad range of tasksperseveration at a broad range of tasks What is the mechanism that underlies What is the mechanism that underlies
mood-as-input effects?mood-as-input effects? What are the parameters within which What are the parameters within which
mood-as-input effects can be expected?mood-as-input effects can be expected? How relevant is mood-as-input to clinical How relevant is mood-as-input to clinical
phenomena?phenomena?