revised - neenah€¦ · revised city of neenah public services and safety committee meeting...

In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Neenah will not discriminatedagainst qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities. If you need assistance,or reasonable accommodation in participating in this meeting or event due to a disability as defined under the ADA, please callthe Public Works Administrative Assistant at (920)886-6240 or the City’s ADA Coordinator at (920)886-6106 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting or event to request an accommodation.

REVISEDCITY OF NEENAH

PUBLIC SERVICES AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETINGTuesday, March 27, 2018 - 7:00 PM

Council Chambers - City Administration Building

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to the requirements of Wis. Stats. Sec. 19.84, that a majority of the Neenah CommonCouncil may be present at this meeting. Common Council members may be present to gather information about a subjectover which they have decision-making responsibility. This may constitute a meeting of the Neenah Common Counciland must be noticed as such. The Council will not take any formal action at this meeting.

A G E N D A

1. Approval of Minutes of the March 13, 2018, Special Meeting and the March 13, 2018,Regular Meeting (Minutes can be found on the City website)

2. Public Appearances

3. Police Department Drone Replacement (Attachment)

4. Police Department Body Camera Equipment Contract (Attachment)

5. Annual DNR Storm Water Report (Attachment)

6. Assessable Frontage Review - Eaglecrest Estates Plat: 1585 and 1589 Remington Road(Attachment)

7. ASSESSMENT AND FUNDING OPTIONS FOR NATURE TRAIL AND EAGLECRESTCONSTRUCTION (DISCUSSION ONLY - NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN)

8. Licensesa. Beverage Operator License Applications (Attachment)b. Beverage Operator License Application (New) - Delinquent Fees (Attachment)c. Temporary Class “B” (Picnic) License Beer & Wine Application (Attachment)

9. Public Works General Construction and Department Activity (Attachment)

10. Announcements / Future Agenda Items

11. Adjournment

CITY OF NEENAHSPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICES AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

Tuesday, March 13, 2018 - 6:00 PMHauser Room - City Administration Building

Present: Aldermen Bates, Hillstrom, Lang, Lendrum and Stevenson

Also Present: Mayor Kaufert, City Attorney Godlewski, Director of Public Works Kaiser, AldermanBoyette

Minutes: Motion/Second/Carried Hillstrom/Lendrum to approve the minutes of the RegularMeeting of February 27, 2018. All voting aye.

Public Appearances: None.

Assessable Frontage Review - 1380 Whispering Pines Lane: Director Kaiser reviewed his March 9,2018, memo. The owner of 1380 Whispering Pines Lane had requested that staff review theassessable frontage calculation for his property at 1380 Whispering Pines Lane. Director Kaiserstated that the frontage calculation was based on viewing the lot as a trapezoid and averaging thefront and rear lot line lengths, which resulted in an assessable frontage of 111.78 feet. He reviewedthree other ways of calculating the assessable frontage – using a modified trapezoid shape with anadjusted rear lot line that was parallel to the front lot line, using the lot width at the 25-foot setbackline, and dividing the lot area by the lot depth to calculate the average width. The assessable frontagewidths calculated with the four methods ranged from 90.30 feet to 113.81 feet. He noted that thetrapezoid method, as originally calculated, was used when the lot was previously assessed for thetemporary 2-inch asphalt mat. The consensus of the Committee was to confirm the original calculationand assign an assessable frontage of 111.78 feet for the lot. Since that was the measurement usedin the previously approved assessment report, no action was needed.

Assessable Frontage Review - 1589 Remington Road: Director Kaiser reviewed his memo of March9, 2018. The owner of 1589 Remington Road had addressed Council regarding the assessablefrontage for his lot. The lot has 135.11 feet of frontage on Nature Trail Drive and 310.56 feet offrontage on Remington Road. As a corner lot, the assessable frontage totals 345.67 feet. DirectorKaiser noted that the southerly two-thirds of the lot is delineated wetlands and unlikely to bedeveloped. He suggested that the assessment for the lot be calculated per ordinance but that theproperty owner be billed based on typical corner lot dimensions in the neighborhood of 110 feet x135.11 feet. That would reduce the billed assessable frontage to 155.04 feet. The difference betweenthe billed assessment and the calculated assessment would be held as a deferred assessment againstthe lot should the remainder of the lot be developed. Mayor Kaufert noted that he had been contactedby another property owner who also has a sizable quantity of wetlands on his property and wasseeking a similar adjustment to his assessable frontage. After discussion, the Committee directedstaff to review the remainder of the Eaglecrest Estates Plat to see if other lots are affected by similarcircumstances and bring all adjustment recommendations to a future Committee meeting.

Approval of Special Assessment Report:Committee reviewed the assessment report for installation of curb, gutter and HMA Pavement in theEaglecrest Subdivision. Director Kaiser noted that the estimated assessment rate of $80 perassessable foot was calculated as a combined project to construct the streets in the EaglecrestEstates subdivision and the streets in the Nature Trails subdivision.

M7

rng-.4L-- M7

rng-.4L-- M7

rng-.4L--

Public Services and Safety Committee Special Meeting MinutesMarch 13, 2018Page 2

City Attorney Godlewski reviewed potential action that could be taken to defer charges for this workuntil 2019. He noted that any action to defer charges should be done when Committee considers theFinal Resolution for the project.

Following discussion, Motion/Second/Carried Stevenson/Lendrum to authorize the Chairman tosign the assessment report for Preliminary Resolution No. 2018-09 for installation of curb,gutter and pavement on Kingswood Drive (Nature Trail to Shootingstar), Remington Road(Nature Trail to Shootingstar), Paintbrush Road (Kingswood to Remington) and ShootingstarDrive (Kingswood to Remington). All voting aye.

Public Works General Construction and Department Activity:1. Contract 8-17 (Commerce Court Pond) – Pipe installation is complete. The contractor has started

to work on expanding the detention pond. Excavated soil is being placed on the south slope ofBell Street.

2. Contract 1-18 (Andrew, Richard, Geiger, Whiting) – A pre-construction meeting was held onMarch 9. The contractor plans to mobilize on March 19 to start work on Geiger. St. GabrielParish/School contacts have been notified. Committee expressed concern that constructionactivities minimize interference with Holy Week activities at St. Gabriel Parish.

3. Contract 2-18 (Cecil, Adams) – A pre-construction meeting was held on March 9.4. Contract 3-18 (Nature Trails/Eaglecrest) – An informational meeting with Eaglecrest residents is

scheduled for March 12. The schedule currently calls for project advertising around March 21/28and bid opening on April 4.

5. City Hall Boilers – Proposals are being received for boiler replacement.6. Storm Water – Staff is preparing the annual storm water report to DNR, which is due at the end

of the month. Director Kaiser noted that this report will require the City to establish a firm path toachieve the required loading allocations.

7. Bergstrom Road Street Lighting – We Energies has started street light installation.8. Epoxy Pavement Marking - Traffic Engineer Merten has begun preparing the pavement marking

contract. Alderman Stevenson noted the Traffic-Outside Services budget carry-forward that willbe directed toward this work. Mayor Kaufert commented on the pavement marking conditionsaround schools and noted that he has asked staff to look at ways to enhance this budget so thatadditional marking work can be done.

Announcements/Future Agenda Items:Alderman Lendrum noted a recent accident where a driver drove off the end of Nicolet Boulevard.She requested that staff look at improving markings to enhance recognition of the end of the road.

Mayor Kaufert informed the Committee that staff is developing a fillable form for Street Use Permits.

Motion/Second/Carried Hillstrom/Lang to adjourn at 6:45 p.m. All voting aye.

Respectfully submitted,

Gerry KaiserDirector of Public Work

CITY OF NEENAHPUBLIC SERVICES AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

Tuesday, March 13, 2018 - 7:00 PMHauser Room - City Administration Building

Present: Aldermen Bates, Hillstrom, Lang, Lendrum, and Stevenson

Also Present: Mayor Kaufert, City Attorney Godlewski, Director of Public Works Kaiser, PoliceChief Wilkinson, William Fishman, Seth Fishman, Jillian Fishman, Andrea Detrie, Liz Detrie,Kimberly Machmueller, Jeffrey Machmueller, Joshua Arneson, Jacob Arneson, AldermanBoyette, Brian Defferding, CSA Gilson, CSA Burrows, CSA McHugh

Appeal of Prohibited Dangerous Animal Designation pursuant to Neenah Code §3-16 – Kimberlyand Jeffrey Machmueller, 973 Byrd Avenue: City Attorney Godlewski outlined the procedures tobe followed for the hearing. City Attorney Godlewski placed all potential witnesses under oath.The prohibited dangerous animal declaration was made following a bite incident involving the dog“Fritzy”. Fritzy is described as a male, tan Terrier mix owned by Kimberly and JeffreyMachmueller.

Chief Wilkinson made an opening statement. He reviewed the events leading to the ProhibitedDangerous Animal declaration. He stated that Fritzy was involved in a bite incident on June 27,2017, which resulted in him being declared a Dangerous Animal. He stated that the ownersindicated that they would pursue a Dangerous Animal license. He stated that the same animalwas involved in another incident on February 1, 2018. He stated that both Fritzy and Bailey, awhite dog also at the residence, escaped from their fenced yard and were each involved in biteincidents. Because of the prior declaration on Fritzy, ordinance required that Fritzy be declareda Prohibited Dangerous animal. This requires that the animal either be removed from the City oreuthanized.

Kimberly and Jeffrey Machmueller made an opening statement. She stated a request to allowher family to keep Fritzy in the City until their house is sold and they can move out of the City.She stated that the house would be going on the market in two weeks. She stated that she ismaking the request because the dog is a companion for her son who has ODD (oppositionaldefiant disorder) and she believes that it has a mental health benefit for him. She expressed thatFritzy is not a vicious dog. She acknowledged that she wasn’t a witness to the February 1 incidentbut stated that she had been on hand during the June 2017 incident, which she felt left Fritzytraumatized. She reiterated her request to keep Fritzy until the house was sold. Mr. Machmuellerindicated that he had also been present at the June 2017 incident and that the bite victim in thatcase had provoked Fritzy. He expressed that removing Fritzy from the house would bedetrimental to his step-son’s health. Mrs. Machmueller stated that she would present testimonialsfrom a number of relatives.

Community Service Aide Michael Gillson testified. He stated that he had responded to theFebruary 1 incident to support Community Service Aide Matthew McHugh. He stated that he hadinterviewed Andrea Detrie, 1142 Meadow Lane. She had told him that she had responded to thesound of dogs barking in front of her house. She stated that when she looked out of the frontwindow, she witnessed a dog biting a boy. Ms. Detrie told him that she had then been bitten butthe bite had not penetrated her boot. She had told him that the dogs had also reacted to a femalestudent who was walking home. He stated that there were two dogs, one brown and one white.

Public Services and Safety Committee MeetingMarch 13, 2018Page 2

He stated that CSA McHugh had met with the female victim and that he had met with the malevictim, Seth Fishman. He confirmed that altogether, three people were bitten by the two dogs.CSA Gilson recounted Mr. Fishman’s statement. Mr. Fishman was walking home from highschool. When he approached the Meadow Lane intersection with Byrd Avenue, he noticed dogsbarking. One of the dogs approached and bit him. He then crossed to the west side of MeadowLane and continued to his home. CSA Gilson described Mr. Fishman’s injuries. Chief Wilkinsonshowed photos of Mr. Fishman’s injury to CSA Gilson. CSA Gilson confirmed that he had takenthe photos. The photos were entered into the record. CSA Gilson described each photo. Henoted that other photos were taken of the injuries to each of Mr. Fishman’s legs but that anequipment malfunction led to the loss of the photos of the more serious injuries on the right leg.The appellant viewed the photos. Using an aerial photo, CSA Gilson noted the locations of theMachmueller house, the Detrie house and Mr. Fishman’s walking route. He stated that onFebruary 2, he had followed up on checking the fencing arrangement at the Machmueller yard.He noted the area where the fence was breached as the probable location of the dog’s escape.Chief Wilkinson provided and CSA Gilson reviewed photos of the rear yard fences for theMachmueller and Detrie properties. The photos were entered into the record. CSA Gilson statedthat he was not involved in the dog license review for Fritzy. He stated that Fritzy was current onvaccinations on February 1 since the quarantine procedure for a vaccinated dog was followed.

Mr. and Mrs. Machmueller questioned CSA Gilson. CSA Gilson noted the fence section that wastipped over where he believes the dog’s escaped. He stated that he could not make a judgmenton whether or not the dogs were strong enough to tip the fence over. He stated that when he metFritzy on February 2, the dog was calm and that he was able to pet Fritzy.

Chief Wilkinson reviewed the fencing requirements for a dangerous animal. He stated that whenoutside, the animal is required to be in a double-walled fence.

Community Service Aide Ashley Burrows testified. She stated that she has been a CSA for 4years and has investigated dozens of dog bite incidents. She stated that she was involved in thisincident to take secondary photos of Mr. Fishman’s injuries because of problems in retrievingsome of the earlier photos. She stated that her follow up was several weeks after the bite incident.Chief Wilkinson showed photos of Mr. Fishman’s injury to CSA Burrows. CSA Burrows confirmedthat she had taken the photos. The photos were entered into the record. CSA Burrows describedeach photo. The appellant viewed the photos. CSA Burrows stated that she had been involvedin the 2017 bite incident involving Fritzy by delivering the dangerous animal letter to theMachmuellers. She described the process for delivering the dangerous animal letter. She statedthat she does not read the letter to the recipient since it is sealed. She stated that she instructsthe recipient to direct questions to Chief Wilkinson.

Seth Fishman testified. He stated that he was walking from the high school to his house onMelrose Court. Using the aerial photo, he described his typical walking route. He stated that theincident happened between 3 and 3:30 p.m. He stated that when he turned north onto MeadowLane from Byrd Avenue, he noticed a dog approach. He stated that the dog bit him on both legsat the northeast corner of the intersection. He stated that he then crossed to the west side ofMeadow Lane and continued home. He stated that this was his first encounter with the dogs.


He stated that both dogs approached him but that only the brown one bit him. Mr. Fishmanreviewed the photos previously entered into the record and confirmed the extent of his injuries.He described the treatment that he received for the injuries. He indicated that there are nolingering physical effects from the bite. He noted that he did not provoke the dogs. He stated thatthe brown dog snarled and growled right before the bite. He stated that the dogs did not followhim when he crossed the street. He did not see anyone else get bit that day.

The Machmuellers questioned Mr. Fishman. He stated that when he first saw the dogs, they werenear the Machmueller residence. The dogs then approached him.

The Committee questioned Mr. Fishman. He stated that he did not see anyone come out at thetime of the incident.

Andrea Detrie testified. She stated that she was in her living room at the time of the incident. Shestated that she heard dogs barking, looked out her window, saw two dogs run to the young manon the sidewalk, and saw the brown dog bite him at least twice. She stated that there was a noiseto the side of the house that distracted the dogs as the man crossed the street. She stated thatshe exited her house through the garage in order to tell her neighbor of the incident. She statedthat the brown dog bit the leather boot that she was wearing. She stated that the dog was growlingas it approached her. She noted that she was on her property when she was bit. As she tried toget the attention of someone at the Machmueller’s she warned a girl who was walking nearby onByrd Avenue. She stated that she was able to get Mr. Machmueller’s attention and he went tothe front door of the house and called the dogs. She state that the brown dog went in but that thewhite dog would not. She stated that she did not see the girl on the sidewalk get bit. She indicatedthat she has not had a prior threatening experience with the dogs. She stated that both dogs hadbeen harassing the girl.

The Machmuellers questioned Ms. Detrie. Mrs. Machmueller described prior history with dogsthat Ms. Detrie had owned. Ms. Detrie stated that the Machmueller’s dogs had been on herproperty before but had not approached her. She acknowledged that she had been screaming toget someone’s attention at the Machmueller house. She also acknowledged telling Mr.Machmueller that she was going to call the police.

Committee questioned Ms. Detrie. She stated that she had observed the dogs being unleashedwhen getting in and out of vehicles after the 2017 dangerous animal declaration.

Kimberly Machmueller stated that she did not have any witnesses to call.

Jacob Arneson, Mrs. Machmueller’s 12-year old son, read a statement. He described how Fritzyhelps to keep him calm when he is having stressful episodes. On questioning from Committee,he indicated that he had witnessed the bite incident in 2017. He described Fritzy’s demeanor asbeing calm and pleasant.

Joshua Arneson, Mrs. Machmueller’s 14-year old son, read a statement. He stated that neitherhe nor Jacob caused the breach in the fence. He stated the belief that the 2017 bite incident wasprovoked.


On questioning from Committee, he stated that this was the only time that the dogs escaped thefenced area. He stated that they use a leash to walk the dogs between the car and the house.He stated that since the 2017 incident they also use a muzzle on Fritzy.

Committee questioned the Machmuellers. City Attorney Godlewski reviewed the dangerousanimal letter with Mrs. Machmueller. She confirmed that they had not appealed the dangerousanimal declaration arising from the June 2017 bite.

Mr. Machmueller stated that they do not have the dangerous animal tag since they were awaitingcontact from the City regarding the documentation that they had provided. He confirmed that theyhad not purchased a 2018 dog license because they misunderstood the coverage period for thelicense. He reviewed the arrangements he took to get the required insurance. He described thevisit that he had with Seth Fishman’s mother after the incident. He stated that she was mainlyconcerned about the status of Fritzy’s shots.

Mrs. Machmueller stated that she wasn’t aware that a double-wall fence was required. She statedthat the insurance company had told them that their insurance would be dropped if they placed a“Dangerous Dog” sign in the front yard. She acknowledged that they hadn’t satisfied all of therequirements listed in the dangerous animal letter. Mrs. Machmueller described the measuresthat they take to leash Fritzy when moving him between the house and a vehicle.

Mr. Machmueller stated that he hadn’t come out of the house at the time of the incident becauseFritzy responded to his call and returned to the house. After Bailey did not come to the house hewent out to get her. He stated that he had not seen Bailey chase anyone before. He stated thatthe dogs had been out 5-10 minutes prior to the incident. He stated that after the dogs were inthe house, he checked the fence and made temporary repairs. He expressed the belief that thedogs could not have knocked down the section of fence where the breach was made. Hedescribed the general fence construction and the manner in which it abuts to Ms. Detrie’s fence.

Mrs. Machmueller reviewed the arrangements to place the house on the market. Chief Wilkinsonreviewed the process for notifying communities when a dog with a dangerous animal declarationis moved into another jurisdiction.

Mr. Machmueller stated that he had not been provided with a copy of the police report that wasprovided to the Committee. Committee discussed the process for providing information toappellants. Mr. Machmueller stated that he was unaware of Bailey’s involvement in a bite until aweek or two after the incident. He was not aware of the implications of the February bite incidenton his insurance.

Chief Wilkinson made a closing statement. He stated that he had intentionally avoided the June2017 bite incident in presenting his case since the dangerous animal declaration arising from thatcase was not appealed. He reviewed the ordinance requirements for a prohibited dangerousanimal declaration and noted that the requirements are satisfied in Fritzy’s case.


Mrs. Machmueller made a closing statement. She reviewed her history of homeownership atthis location. She noted that she had adopted Fritzy in 2015 as a rescue from a kennel inIndiana. She described the bond between her son Jacob and Fritzy and the comfort that Fritzyprovides to him. She expressed her concern with the impact that losing Fritzy would have onher son. She described public places where they have taken Fritzy without incident. Shestated that they have decided to sell their home so that they can keep Fritzy. She stated thather family is working to prepare the house for sale. She requested that Fritzy be allowed tostay with them until they can move. She stated that Fritzy would be on a leash and muzzledat all times when out. She expressed a willingness to submit to random checks to make surethat the conditions for keeping Fritzy are being satisfied. She presented the Committee withphotos of Fritzy and letters of support.

Motion/Second/Carried Stevenson/Hillstrom to convene into Closed Session in theCouncil Chambers, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §19.85(1)(a) for the purpose of conductingdeliberations regarding the Prohibited Dangerous Dog Designation Appeal by KimberlyMachmueller, 973 Byrd Avenue. All voting aye.

Motion/Second/Carried Lendrum/Stevenson to reconvene into Open Session toannounce result of deliberations on appeal of Prohibited Dangerous Dog DesignationAppeal by Kimberly Machmueller, 973 Byrd Avenue. All voting aye.

Upon reconvening, City Attorney Godlewski reviewed the Committee’s ruling. He stated thatthe Committee on a vote of 5-0 upheld the Prohibited Dangerous Animal declaration for Fritzy.He stated that the Machmueller’s would have until April 30, 2018, to comply with therequirements of the declaration. While Fritzy is in Neenah, the following conditions apply:

• Fritzy must be indoors at all times except when being let out to relieve himself or whenbeing transported;

• When Fritzy is outside he must be cage muzzled and restrained by a leash no longerthan six feet in length and controlled by an adult;

• Appellants are to inform Chief Wilkinson of where they will be moving.• Appellants accept spot checks to insure compliance with these conditions.

City Attorney Godlweski informed the Machmuellers that he would prepare the formal Findingsof Fact and Conclusions of Law document for their signature.

Motion/Second/Carried Stevenson/Lendrum to adjourn at 9:20 p.m. All voting aye.

Respectfully submitted,

Gerry KaiserDirector of Public Works

Police Department Police Department Police Department

m

e

m

o

r

a

n

d

u

m

To: Finance and Personnel Committee

From: Captain Edgar Gonzalez

Re: Drone Replacement

Date: 2/28/2018

The purpose of this memo is to respectfully request authorization to replacethe City of Neenah’s drone.

In 2017, two of our drone pilots were flying the drone at the request ofCommunity Development. The project included a flyover of our Downtownarea. The pilots stood on E Wisconsin Avenue and flew the drone west onWisconsin Avenue, toward Church Street. There were power lines at theintersection of W Wisconsin Avenue and Church Street within a few feet ofthe altitude chosen for the flight. These power lines were not visible fromwhere the pilots stood. One of the pilots is responsible for monitoring thevideo feed from the drone and when he saw the power lines, it was too latefor the pilot to react.

The damage to the drone was too much to repair and while the insurancecoverage includes liability, the property damage coverage has a $5,000deductible. The drone and the equipment damaged was worth $2,600.

Since this incident occurred, the pilots have discussed modifications to theirprocedures to increase the likelihood of avoiding a crash like this again.

We have obtained a new quote to replace the drone and the costs ofreplacement are as follows:

• DJI Inspire 1 – Minus Remote: $1,670.00• DJI Zenmuse Z3 7x Zoom Drone Camera: $881.02• Total: $2551.02

Recommendation: An appropriate motion would be to authorize thepurchase of a replacement drone for a total of $2551.02 using the City’sPerparedness Grand funds.

www.facebook.com/nsaaerial

NSA AERIAL INVOICE / 02-18-2018

Please make checks payable to:

Jeremy Drexler

E8069 E Lake Virginia Rd

Reedsburg, WI 53959

Neenah Police Dept

2111 Marathon St.

Neenah, WI 54956

Contact: Josh Peterson 920-886-6000

BALANCE DUE

Upon Receipt

$1670.00

Item Description Quantity Price Per Total

DJI Inspire 1 - Minus remote 1 $1670.00 $1670.00

Subtotal $1670.00

TOTAL $1670.00


m

e

m

o

r

a

n

d

u

m

To: Finance and Personnel Committee

From: Captain Edgar Gonzalez

Re: Body Camera Equipment Contract

Date: 3/2/2018

The purpose of this memo is to respectfully request authorization to enter intoa five-year contract with Axon (formerly Taser International), starting at$20,432.16 in 2018.

Axon’s new contract with Neenah PD includes the following:• 39 Axon Body 2 Cameras with extended 5 year warranty• Upgrades to all cameras and docks at both 2.5 and 5 year mark• (5) 6-Bay Axon Body 2 docks with wall mounts• Various camera mount systems• 5 years of Evidence.com licensing and storage (34 Basic licenses and

6 PRO Admin licenses)• 9 Signal Units for squads (signal activation of body cameras when

emergency lights are on)

The cost breakdown by year is:• Year 1: $20,432.16• Year 2: $22,806.00• Year 3: $22,806.00• Year 4: $22,806.00• Year 5: $22,806.00• Total: $111,656.16

The body cameras have proven their usefulness time and again by granting usthe ability to pull up a video recording in response to citizen complaints, andas a training tool. As part of this contract, we have requested the addition ofSignal Units for the nine patrol squads. These units transmit a signal whenemergency lights are running that will activate all of the body cameras withinrange. Our goal with this is to minimize the important incidents that are notrecorded.

Through this contract, our equipment would be replaced three times in fiveyears. We would get new equipment the first year (2018), then replacementequipment two and a half years into the contract and once more on the fifthyear.


m

e

m

o

r

a

n

d

u

m

Recommendation: An appropriate motion would be to authorize the signingof a five-year contract with Axon (formerly Taser International) for theDepartment’s body camera equipment, maintenance and data storage feestotaling $20,432.16 for 2018, to be paid out of CIP account 011-2133-743-8133. We have budgeted $20,480 through CIP for 2018. The total cost ofthe contract over a five year period is $111,656.16.

A AXON 4 A AXON 4 A AXON 4

Start Date: 04/01/2018

Payment Terms: Net 30

Delivery Method: Fedex - Ground

Primary Contact:

Edgardo Gonzalez

(920) 886-6000

[email protected]

Protect Life.

QUOTE: Q-154655-43179.680KP

Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Protect Life.

17800 N 85th St.

Scottsdale , Arizona , 85255United StatesPhone: (800) 978-2737

BILL TO:Neenah Police Dept. - WI

2111 Marathon Avne

Neenah, WI 54956

US

SHIP TO:Edgardo Gonzalez

Neenah Police Dept. - WI

2111 Marathon Aven.

Neenah, WI 54956

US

Year 1

Item Description QuantityList Unit

Price Net Unit Price Total (USD)

Axon Plans & Packages

80012BASIC EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE: YEAR 1

PAYMENT34 180.00 180.00 6,120.00

85110 EVIDENCE.COM INCLUDED STORAGE 340 0.00 0.00 0.00

80022 PRO EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE: YEAR 1 PAYMENT 6 468.00 70.20 421.20


85035 EVIDENCE.COM STORAGE 3,500 0.75 1.50 5,250.00

87026TASER ASSURANCE PLAN DOCK 2 ANNUAL

PAYMENT5 216.00 216.00 1,080.00

85070TASER ASSURANCE PLAN ANNUAL PAYMENT,

BODYCAM37 204.00 204.00 7,548.00

Hardware

74001AXON CAMERA ASSEMBLY, ONLINE, AXON BODY

2, BLK37 399.00 0.00 0.00

74020 MAGNET MOUNT, FLEXIBLE, AXON RAPIDLOCK 37 0.00 0.00 0.00

74021MAGNET MOUNT, THICK OUTERWEAR, AXON

RAPIDLOCK37 0.00 0.00 0.00

74023 LG POCKET MOUNT, 6 IN, AXON RAPIDLOCK 37 0.00 0.00 0.00

11507 MOLLE MOUNT, SINGLE, AXON RAPIDLOCK 15 0.00 0.00 0.00

11508 MOLLE MOUNT, DOUBLE, AXON RAPIDLOCK 15 0.00 0.00 0.00

11553 SYNC CABLE, USB A TO 2.5MM 37 0.00 0.00 0.00

74008 AXON DOCK, 6 BAY + CORE, AXON BODY 2 5 1,495.00 0.00 0.00

70112 AXON SIGNAL UNIT 9 279.00 0.00 0.00

Issue Date: 03/20/2018

Quote Expiration: 03/31/2018

Q-154655-43179.680KP1

Sales Representative:

Kenneth Pederson

Phone:

Email: [email protected]

Fax:

Account Number: 107541

Year 1 (Continued)


PriceNet Unit Price Total (USD)

Hardware (Continued)

70033WALL MOUNT BRACKET, ASSY, EVIDENCE.COM

DOCK5 35.00 0.00 0.00

Subtotal 20,419.20

Estimated Shipping 12.96

Taxes 0.00

Total 20,432.16

SPARE



Hardware

74001AXON CAMERA ASSEMBLY, ONLINE, AXON BODY

2, BLK2 0.00 0.00 0.00

74020 MAGNET MOUNT, FLEXIBLE, AXON RAPIDLOCK 2 0.00 0.00 0.00

74021MAGNET MOUNT, THICK OUTERWEAR, AXON

RAPIDLOCK2 0.00 0.00 0.00

11553 SYNC CABLE, USB A TO 2.5MM 2 0.00 0.00 0.00

Subtotal 0.00

Taxes 0.00

Total 0.00

Year 2





PAYMENT34 180.00 180.00 6,120.00


80023 PRO EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE: YEAR 2 PAYMENT 6 468.00 468.00 2,808.00




PAYMENT5 216.00 216.00 1,080.00


BODYCAM37 204.00 204.00 7,548.00

Subtotal 22,806.00

Taxes 0.00

Total 22,806.00

Q-154655-43179.680KP2

Year 3





PAYMENT34 180.00 180.00 6,120.00






PAYMENT5 216.00 216.00 1,080.00


BODYCAM37 204.00 204.00 7,548.00

Subtotal 22,806.00

Taxes 0.00

Total 22,806.00

Year 4





PAYMENT34 180.00 180.00 6,120.00






PAYMENT5 216.00 216.00 1,080.00


BODYCAM37 204.00 204.00 7,548.00

Subtotal 22,806.00

Taxes 0.00

Total 22,806.00

Year 5





PAYMENT34 180.00 180.00 6,120.00


Q-154655-43179.680KP3

Year 5 (Continued)



Axon Plans & Packages (Continued)





PAYMENT5 216.00 216.00 1,080.00


BODYCAM37 204.00 204.00 7,548.00

Subtotal 22,806.00

Taxes 0.00

Total 22,806.00

Grand Total 111,656.16

Q-154655-43179.680KP4

4\ AXON 4\ AXON 4\ AXON

Summary of Payments

Payment Amount (USD)

Year 1 20,432.16

SPARE 0.00

Year 2 22,806.00

Year 3 22,806.00

Year 4 22,806.00

Year 5 22,806.00

Grand Total 111,656.16

Q-154655-43179.680KP5

Discounts (USD)Quote Expiration: 03/31/2018

List Amount 125,829.00

Discounts 14,185.80

Total 111,643.20

*Total excludes applicable taxes and shipping

Notes

*Do not Ship or Invoice Until A PO Is Received From The Agency*

Agency has existing contract 2922 from 6/15/14 to 6/14/19 and is interested in transitioning to a new agreement effective 3/1/2018. Cancellation of contract 2922 is accepted when

receipt of an executed copy of this agreement is received.

Axon’s Sales Terms and Conditions

By signing this Quote, you certify that you have read and agree to the provisions set forth in this Quote and Axon’s Master Services

and Purchasing Agreement (MSPA), posted at https://www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions, as well as the attached

Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview Room purchase, if applicable. You represent that you are legally

authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of your entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote.

Signature: CustSIG Date: CustDate

Name (Print): CustName Title: CustTitle

PO# (Or write

N/A): CustPo

Please sign and email to Kenneth Pederson at [email protected] or fax to

Thank you for being a valued Axon customer. For your convenience on your next order, please check out our online store buy.axon.com

Quote: Q-154655-43179.680KP

‘Protect Life’© and TASER® are registered trademarks of Axon Enterprise, Inc, registered in the U.S. © 2013

Axon Enterprise, Inc. All rights reserved.

Q-154655-43179.680KP6

https://www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions

https://buy.axon.com/

Submittal of Annual Reports and other Compliance Documents for Municipal

Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permits

NOTE: Missing or incomplete fields are highlighted at the bottom of each page. You may save, close and return to your draft permit as often as necessary to complete

your application. After 120 days your draft is deleted.

Required Attachments and Supplemental Information

Please complete the contents of each tab to submit your MS4 permit compliance document. The information

included in this checklist is necessary for a complete submittal. A complete and detailed submittal will help us

review about your MS4 permit document. To help us make a decision in the shortest amount of time possible, the

following information must be submitted:

� Review related web site and instructions for Municipal storm water permit eReporting [Exit Form]

� Attach the following items as appropriate using the attachments tab above

� Construction Site Pollution Control Annual Report Summary

� Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Annual Report Summary

� Leaf and Yard Waste Management

� Municipal Cooperation Attachment

� Municipal Facility Inspections

� Pollution Prevention Annual Report Summary

� Post-Construction Storm Water Management Annual Report Summary

� Public Education and Outreach Annual Report Summary

� Public Involvement and Participation Annual Report Summary

� Storm Water Consortium/Group Report

� Storm Sewer Map Annual Report Attachment

� Storm Water Quality Management Annual Report Attachment

� TMDL Attachment

� Winter Road Maintenance

� Other Annual Report Attachment

� Complete all required forms and upload required attachments

� Sign and Submit form

Reporting Information

Submittal Type: Annual Report

Project Name: Annual Report

County: Winnebago

Municipality: Neenah, City

Facility Number: 31112

Reporting Year: 2017

Annual Report

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0

El

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0

El

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0

El

Do not close your work until you SAVE.

Form 3400-224 (09/17)

Note: Compliance items must be submitted using the Attachments tab.

Municipal Contact Information- Complete

Notice: Pursuant to s. NR 216.07(8), Wis. Adm. Code, an owner or operator of a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) is

required to submit an annual report to the Department of Natural Resources (Department) by March 31 of each year to report on

activities for the previous calendar year (“reporting year”). This form is being provided by the Department for the user’s convenience for

reporting on activities undertaken in each reporting year of the permit term. Personal information collected will be used for

administrative purposes and may be provided to the extent required by Wisconsin’s Open Records Law [ss. 19.31-19.39, Wis. Stats.].

Municipality Information

Name of Municipality Neenah, City

Facility ID # or (FIN): 31112

Updated Information: Check to update mailing address information

Mailing Address: 211 Walnut Street

Mailing Address 2:

City: Neenah

State: Wisconsin

Zip Code: xxxxx or xxxxx-xxxx54956

Does the municipality rely on another government entity to satisfy some of the permit requirements?

Yes No Unsure

Has there been any changes to the municipality’s participation in group efforts towards permit compliances (i.e.,

the municipality has added or dropped consortium membership)?

Yes No Unsure

Primary Municipal Contact Person (Authorized Representative for MS4 Permit)

Select to create new primary contact

First Name: Heath

Last Name: Kummerow

Select to update current contact information

Title:

Mailing Address: 211 Walnut St

Mailing Address 2:

City: Neenah

State: WI


Phone Number: Ext: xxx-xxx-xxxx920-886-6245


❑❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑❑

❑❑

Additional Contacts Information (Optional)

Individual with responsibility for:

(Check all that apply)

I&E Program

IDDE Program

IDDE Response Procedure Manual

Municipal-wide Water Quality Plan

Ordinances

Pollution Prevention Program

Post-Construction Program

Winter roadway maintenance

First Name: Rick

Last Name: Freese

Title: P.W. Superintendent

Mailing Address: 1495 Tullar Road

Mailing Address 2:

City: Neenah

State: WI


Phone Number: Ext: xxx-xxx-xxxx920-886-6261


Missing Information

® 0

0 ®

0 0

0 0

0 ®

0 0

® 0

0 ®

0 0

0 0

0 ®

0 0

® 0

0 ®

0 0

0 0

0 ®

0 0

Form 3400-224 (09/17)

Minimum Control Measures- Section 1 :

a. Complete the following information on Public Education and Outreach Activities related to storm

water. Select the Mechanism that best describes how the topic message was conveyed to your

population. Use the Add Activity to add multiple Mechanisms. For Quantity, choose the range for the

number of Mechanisms chosen (i.e., number of workshops, events). Quantity and Estimated People

reached are both optional.

Topic: Detection and elimination of illicit discharges

Topic: Management of materials that may cause storm water pollution from automobiles, pet waste,

household hazardous waste and household practices

Topic: Beneficial onsite reuse of leaves and grass clippings/proper use of lawn and garden fertilizers

and pesticides

Topic: Management of stream banks and shorelines by riparian landowners to minimize erosion and

restore and enhance the ecological value of waterways

Topic: Infiltration of residential storm water runoff from rooftop downspouts, driveways and

sidewalks

Topic: Inform and where appropriate educate those responsible for the design, installation, and

maintenance of construction site erosion control practices and storm water management facilities on

how to design, install and maintain the practices

Topic: Identify businesses and activities that may pose a storm water contamination concern, and


Complete

1. Public Education and Outreach

Mechanism Quantity(optional)

Est. People Reached (optional)

Regional Effort?(optional)

Active distribution of print media

(mailings, newsletters, etc)

1 - 9 Yes No

Passive print media (brochures at front

desk, posters, etc.)

1 - 9 Yes No



1 - 9 Yes No

Workshops 1 - 9 43 Yes No



1 - 9 Yes No


Est. People Reached (optional)


Government event (public hearing, council

meeting, etc.)

1 - 9 Yes No

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

where appropriate, educate specific audiences on methods of storm water pollution prevention

Topic: Promote environmentally sensitive land development designs by developers and designers,

including green infrastructure and low impact development

Topic: Other (describe):

b. Any other Public Education and Outreach program information for inclusion in the Annual Report

may be added here or attached on the attachments page.

Form 3400-224 (09/17)

Minimum Control Measures - Section 2 :

a. Describe how the municipality has kept the following local officials and municipal staff apprised of

the municipal storm water discharge permit programs and its requirements.

Elected Officials

Municipal Officials

Appropriate Staff

b. Complete the following information on Public Involvement Activities related to storm water. Select

the mechanism that best describes how the topic message was conveyed to your population. Use the

Government event (public hearing, council

meeting, etc.)

1 - 9 Yes No

Did not focus on this topic this reporting

year

Select... Yes No

Select... Select... Yes No

Missing Information


Complete

2. Public Involvement and Participation

The Annual Report was presented to elected officials at the Public Services and Safety

Committee meeting. Permit and TMDL requirements are discussed during budget

meetings and when the CIP is established.

City Staff present the needs of the stormwater program, permit requirements and

TMDL requirements during meetings, with requests for projects and equipment,

during budget discussions, and with Committee meetings.

Receive updates from DNR at NEWSC meetings, Fox Wolf Storm Water Conference

and email alerts from the DNR.

0 0

0 0

0 0

® 0

0 0

0 0

El

El

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

® 0

0 0

0 0

El

El

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

® 0

0 0

0 0

El

El

0

Add Activity to add multiple mechanisms. For Quantity, choose the range for number Mechanisms

chosen (i.e., number of workshops, events). Quantity and Estimated People reached are both

optional .

Topic: Storm Water Management Plan and/or updates

Topic: Storm water related ordinance and/or updates

Topic: MS4 Annual Report

Topic: Volunteer Opportunities

Topic: Other (describe) :

c. Any other Public Involvement and Participation program information for inclusion in the Annual

Report may be added here or attached on the attachments page

Form 3400-224 (09/17)



Est. People Reached(optional)


Presentation of Storm Water Information 1 - 9 40 Yes No

None Select... Yes No

Government Event (Public Hearing,

Council Meeting, etc)

1 - 9 20 Yes No

Website 1 - 9 Yes No

Clean-up events 1 - 9 37 Yes No

Select... Select... Yes No

Missing Information


Complete

3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

a. How many total outfalls does the municipality have? 141 Unsure

b. How many outfalls did the municipality evaluate as part

of their routine ongoing field screening program?50 Unsure

c. How many were confirmed illicit discharges? 0 Unsure

d. How many illicit discharge complaints did the

municipality receive?3 Unsure

El

El

0 0 0 El

El

El

El

0 0 0 El

El

El

El

0 0 0 El

El

Form 3400-224 (09/17)


e. How many were confirmed illicit discharges? 1 Unsure

f. How many of the identified Illicit discharges did the

municipality eliminate in the reporting year?0 Unsure

g. How many of the following enforcement mechanisms did the municipality

use to enforce its illicit discharge ordinance?

Unsure

Verbal Warning 1

Written Warning (including email) 0

Notice of Violation 0

Civil Penalty/ Citation 0

h. Any other Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination program information for

inclusion in the Annual Report may be added here or attached on the attachments

page.

Missing Information


Complete

4. Construction Site Pollutant Control

a. How many total construction sites were active at any point

in the reporting year?64 Unsure

b. How many construction sites did the municipality issue

permits for in the reporting year?64 Unsure

c. Do the above numbers include sites <1 acre? Yes No Unsure

d. How many erosion control inspections did the municipality

complete in the reporting year?141 Unsure

e. What types of enforcement actions does the municipality have available

to compel compliance with the regulatory mechanism? Check all that

apply and enter the number of each used in the reporting year.

Unsure

Verbal Warning 12




Stop Work Order 0

Forfeiture of Deposit

No Authority

El

O

El

El

O

O

El

O

O

O

El

O

El

El

O

O

El

O

O

O

El

O

El

El

O

O

El

O

O

O

Form 3400-224 (09/17)


Other - Describe below

f. Any other Construction Site Pollutant Control program information for inclusion in

the Annual Report may be added here or attached on the attachments page.

Missing Information


Complete

5. Post-Construction Storm Water Management

a. How many new construction sites with new structural storm

water management practices have received local approvals ?3 Unsure

b. How many privately owned storm water facility inspections

were completed in the reporting year ?26 Unsure

c. What types of enforcement actions does the municipality have available

to compel compliance with the regulatory mechanism? Check all that

apply and enter the number of each used in the reporting year.

Unsure

Verbal Warning 5




Forfeiture of Deposit

Complete maintenance 0

Bill responsible part 0

No Authority


d. Any other Post-Construction Storm Water Management program information for

inclusion in the Annual Report may be added here or attached on the attachments

page.

Missing Information

0

0 0 0

0

0 0 0

o 0 0 0

o

® 0 0 0

D

0 0

D

0

0 0 0

0

0 0 0

o 0 0 0

o

® 0 0 0

D

0 0

D

0

0 0 0

0

0 0 0

o 0 0 0

o

® 0 0 0

D

0 0

D

Form 3400-224 (09/17)


Minimum Control Measures - Section 6 : Complete

6. Pollution Prevention

Storm Water Management Facility Inspections (ponds, biofilters, etc.) Not Applicable

a. Enter the total number of municipally owned or operated

structural storm water facilities ?22 Unsure

b. How many new municipally owned storm water facilities were

installed in the reporting year ?1 Unsure

c. How many municipally owned storm water devices were inspected

in the reporting year?22 Unsure

d. How many of these facilities required maintenance?

If so, attach report on attachments page.0 Unsure

Public Works Yards & Other Municipally Owned Properties (SWPPP Plan Review) Not Applicable

e. How many inspections of municipal properties been conducted in

the reporting year?6 Unsure

f. Have amendments to the SWPPPs been made? Yes No Unsure

Collection Services - Street Sweeping / Cleaning Program Not Applicable

g. Did the municipality conduct street sweeping/cleaning during the reporting year?

Yes No Unsure

h. If known, how many tons of material was removed? 549 Unsure

i. If street cleaning is identified as a storm water best management practice in the

pollutant loading analysis, was street cleaning completed at the assumed frequency?

Yes

No - Explain

Not Applicable

Unsure

Collection Services - Catch Basin Sump Cleaning Program Not Applicable

j. Did the municipality conduct catch basin sump cleaning during the reporting year?

Yes No Unsure

k. How many catch basin sumps were cleaned in the reporting year? 3981 Unsure

l. If known, how many tons of material was removed? 61 Unsure

m. If catch basin sump cleaning is identified as a storm water best management

practice in the pollutant loading analysis, was cleaning completed at the assumed

frequency?

Yes

No - Explain

0 0

D O 0 0

O 0 0

® 0 0

D

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0 ® 0

0

0 0

D O 0 0

O 0 0

® 0 0

D

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0 ® 0

0

0 0

D O 0 0

O 0 0

® 0 0

D

® 0 0

0 ® 0

0 ® 0

0 *Note: We are requesting information that goes beyond the reporting year, answer the best you can.

Not Applicable

Unsure

Collection Services - Leaf Collection Program Not Applicable

n. Does the municipality conduct curbside leaf collection? Yes No

Unsure

o. Does the municipality notify homeowners about pickup? Yes No

Unsure

Where are the residents directed to store the leaves for collection?

Pile on terrace Pile in street Bags on terrace Unsure

Other - Describe

p. What is the frequency of collection?

q. Is collection followed by street sweeping/cleaning? Yes No

Unsure

Winter Road Management Not Applicable

r. How many lane-miles of roadway is the municipality

responsible for doing snow and ice control?Unsure135

s. Provide amount of de-icing products used by month last winter season?

Solids (tons) (ex. sand, or salt-sand)

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March* 0 38 497 412 447 200

Liquids (gallons) (ex. brine)

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March* 0 600 6900 5250 11350 3000

t Was salt applying machinery calibrated in the reporting year? Yes No

Unsure

u. Have municipal personnel attended salt reduction strategy

training in the reporting year?

Yes No

Unsure

If yes, describe what training was provided:

When: How many attended:

Internal (Staff) Education & Communication

v. Have training or education on SWPPPs for municipal facilities

been held for municipal or other personnel?

Yes No

Unsure

If yes, describe what training was provided

When: How many attended:

Additional Pollution Prevention Information

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

w. Any other Pollution Prevention program information for inclusion in the Annual Report may be

added here or attached on the attachments page.

Form 3400-224 (09/17)


Missing Information


Complete

7. Storm Sewer System Map

a. Did the municipality update their storm sewer map this year? Yes No Unsure

If yes, check the areas the map items that got updated or changed:

Storm water treatment facilities

Storm pipes

Vegetated swales

Outfalls


b. Any other Storm Sewer System Map information for inclusion in the Annual Report

may be added here or attached on the attachments page.

Form 3400-224 (09/17)

Final Evaluation -

Fiscal Analysis

Complete the fiscal analysis table provided below. For municipalities that do not break out funding

into permit program elements, please enter the monetary amount to your best estimate of what

funding may be going towards these programs.

Element: Public Education and Outreach

Element: Public Involvement and Participation

Element: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

Element: Construction Site Pollutant Control

Element: Post-Construction Storm Water Management

Element: Pollution Prevention

Element: Storm Water Quality Management

Element: Storm Sewer System Map

Other (describe)

Missing Information


Complete

Annual

Expenditure

Reporting Year

Budget

Reporting Year

Budget

Upcoming Year

Source of Funds

2017 1668 1690 Storm water utility








0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water Quality

a: Were there any known water quality improvements or degradation in the receiving waters to

which the municipality’s storm sewer system directly discharges to?

Yes No Unsure If Yes, explain below:

b: Have any of the receiving waters that the municipality discharges to been added to the impaired

waters list during the reporting year?

Yes No Unsure

c: Has the municipality evaluated their storm water practices to reduce the pollutants of concern?

Yes No Unsure

Additional Information

Based on the municipality’s storm water program evaluation in Part II, describe any proposed

changes to the municipality’s storm water program.

Select...

Form 3400-224 (09/17)

Requests for Assistance on Improving Permit Programs

Would municipality like the Department to contact them about providing more information on

developing or improving any of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit programs?

Please select all that apply:

Public Education and Outreach

Public Involvement

Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

Post-Construction Storm Water Management

Storm Water Quality Management

Storm Sewer System Map

Construction Site Pollutant Control

Pollution Prevention

Water Quality Concerns

Compliance Schedule Items Due

MS4 Program Evaluation

Missing Information


8 8 8

Required Attachments and Supplemental Information

Upload Required Attachments (15 MB per file limit) - Help reduce file size and trouble shoot file uploads

*Required Item

Note: To replace an existing file, use the 'Click here to attach file ' link or press the to delete an item.

Attach Documents

(To remove additional items, use your cursor to hover over the attachment section. When the drop down arrow appears, select remove

item)


Any other MS4 program information for inclusion in the Annual Report may be attached on here. Use

the Add Additional Attachments to add multiple documents.

AR_SWMapFIN

File Attachment

Draft and Share PDF Report with Municipality's Governing Body.

Press the button below to create a PDF. The PDF will be sent to the email address associated with the WAMS ID that

is signed in. After the annual report has been approved by the governing body, you will have to come back to the MS4

eReporting system to submit the report to the DNR.

Draft and Share PDF Report with Municipality's Governing Body

0 0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0 0

0

0

Steps to Complete the signature process

1. Read and Accept the Terms and Conditions

2. Press the Submit and Send to the DNR button

NOTE: For security purposes all email correspondence will be sent to the address you used when

registering your WAMS ID. This may be a different email than that provided in the application. For

information on your WAMS account click HERE .

Terms and Conditions

Certification: I hereby certify that I am an authorized representative of the municipality covered

under Neenah, City MS4 Permit for which this annual report or other compliance document is being

submitted, and that the information contained in this submittal and all attachments were gathered

and prepared under my direction or supervision. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons under

my direction or supervision involved in the preparation of this document, to the best of my

knowledge, the information is true, accurate, and complete. I further certify that the municipality’s

governing body or delegated representatives have reviewed or been apprised of the contents of this

annual report. I understand that Wisconsin law provides severe penalties for submitting false

information.

Signee (must check current role prior to accepting terms and conditions)

Authorized municipal contact using WAMS ID.

Delegation of Signature Authority ( Form 3500-123 ) for agent signing on the behalf of the

authorized municipal contact.

Agent seeking to share this item with authorized municipal contact (authorized municipal

contact must get WAMS id and complete signature).

After providing the final authorized signature, the system will send an email to the authorized party and any agents. This email will

include a copy to the final read only version of this application.


Sign and Submit Your Application

Authorized Signature.

I accept the above

terms and conditions.

CITY OF NEENAH

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

TSS (lbs) TP (lbs) Capital &

TSS Fox Neenah Lake Total Fox Neenah Lake Total TP 20 year

Cost/LB River Slough Winn. Cumulative River Slough Winn. Cumulative Cost/LB O & M Activity

Ranking Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Ranking Costs Year Proposed BMP Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Comments

2012 Existing BMPs

35,040 251,214 0 286,254 70.0 474.0 544.0 2012 Existing BMPs with High Efficiency Street SweepingX X X

91 334 286,588 1.0 545.0 89 $70,449 Bluebird Court Pond

493 287,081 545.0 Menasha Packaging (Gillingham Rd) Verify agreement was filed with County.

22 287,103 0.5 545.5 Affinity Health Clinic Biofilter SLAM model for TP needed

262 287,365 0.6 546.1 Directions Biofilter SLAM model for TP needed

637 288,002 1.2 547.3 Festival Biofilter Verify agreement was filed with County.

40 288,042 0.1 547.4 CVS Stormceptor Verify agreement was filed with County.

116 288,158 0.2 547.6 Winnebago Credit Union Biofilter Verify agreement was filed with County.

59 1,884 290,042 3.9 551.5 70 $131,468 Bridgewood Pond Verify agreement was filed with County.

71 1,128 291,170 2.8 554.3 71 $107,455 Bridgewood Condos Pond #1 Verify agreement was filed with County.

74 1,153 292,323 3.0 557.3 72 $113,260 Bridgewood Condos Pond #2 Verify agreement was filed with County.

292,323 0.3 557.6 Doty Park Rain Garden Need New SLAM model

2,451 294,774 4.0 561.6 $2,000 Woodside Green Estates Pond Maintenance Agreement

59,719 354,493 69.4 631.0 $413,240 2018 Commerce Court Pond Expansion & Storm Sewer Need New SLAM model with storage devices included

150 354,643 1.0 632.0 $15,000 2018 Green Meadows Biofilter Need New SLAM model

354,643 1.0 633.0 $4,000 2018 Washington Park Biofilter Need New SLAM model

300 354,943 1.0 634.0 $4,000 2018 Gateway Parking Lot Biofilter Need New SLAM model

193 355,136 1.0 635.0 $2,000 2019 Western Ave Substation Biofilter Maintenance Agreement, SLAM for TP

5 1,428 356,564 3.0 638.0 $30,889 2019 Western Ave Townhouses Pond Maintenance Agreement, SLAM for TP

15 41,441 398,005 85.9 723.9 19 $1,231,154 2019 Harrison North Pond X X X Need land from Foundry

10 2,473 400,478 2.0 725.9 $67,134 2019 Wal-mart Pond X Maintenance Agreement

729 401,207 1.0 726.9 $2,000 2020 Galloway Biofilters SLAM model for TP needed

6 40,919 442,126 8.3 735.2 52 $201,937 2020 Neenah Foundry Pond (Existing) Need to evaluate TP removal with SLAM, Maint. Agreement/Foundry Payment

442,126 1.0 736.2 2020 Neenah Foundry Parking Lot Biofilter Maintenance Agreement

16 442,126 0.3 736.5 $5,000 2020 Neenah Foundry MH Filter Maintenance Agreement

50 1,573 443,699 4.4 740.9 41 $90,766 2021 VNA Pond - Lyon Dr X Maintenance Agreement

250 443,949 1.0 741.9 2021 Fairview Biofilter Need New SLAM model

1 8,231 452,180 10.0 751.9 $131,076 2021 Bergstrom Road Pond (Dayton Freight) X X X Maintenance Agreement

7 7,227 459,407 19.0 770.9 39 $380,437 2022 Menasha Corp Pond X X X Maintenance Agreement

30,000 489,407 55.0 825.9 $557,000 2023 Winneconne - Monroe Overpass Pond Need for Sherry St diversion (expands Harrison North pond) Need SLAM

1,327 490,734 825.9 $2,000 2024 Menasha Packaging Pond (Gillingham Rd) Maintenance Agreement

919 491,653 825.9 $2,000 2024 Muti Storage Pond (Bergstrom Rd) Maintenance Agreement

7,124 498,777 24.0 849.9 $2,000 2024 Pendleton Park Pond Maintenance Agreement

498,777 849.9 $250,000 2025 Sherry storm redirect to North Harrison pond Treat runoff from Fox River

8 7,511 506,288 22.1 872.0 1 $189,803 2026 Baldwin Park Pond X X X Park Approval, Previous dump site

9 8,810 8,810 523,908 23.0 23.0 918.0 5 $500,000 2027 Douglas Park Pond (Orig. Est. $239,156) X X X Park Approval / Coordinate with Commercial Street construction

32 4,255 528,163 918.0 $177,134 2029 Boat Ramp Pond (Pool Pond)

Need New SLAM model - Add area to north - May move up with parking lot

reconstruct

4 55,461 583,624 124.7 1,042.7 4 $1,187,071 2030 Neenah Foundry Pond Modification (Brooks) X X X Modify or additional pond

1,500 585,124 1,042.7 $120,000 2031 Downtown Storm Detention SLAM model needed

20 8,077 593,201 22.4 1,065.1 8 $253,510 2033 Gillingham & Cecil Pond Need DOT property

12 18,538 611,739 43.5 1,108.6 11 $750,000 2035 Island Park Pond (original cost est. $530,698) X X X Park Approval

21 9,235 620,974 24.2 1,132.8 12 $298,687 2036 Theda Pond/Bio Filter X

17 33,463 654,437 80.2 1,213.0 13 $1,028,895 2037 Breezewood Pond X X X31 5,563 660,000 11.9 1,224.9 30 $217,134 2038 Cook Park Pond X

Total 109,258 546,487 4,255 660,000 229.5 994.4 1.0 1,224.9

Allocations for the Upper Fox - Wolf TMDL have not been established yet. More projects will likely be needed inRequired 104,069 521,383 0 625,452 76 636 0 712 LFR TMDL Load Allocation the Lake Winnebago drainage basin.

Reduction Fox Neenah Lake Fox Neenah Lake The City currently collects leaves according to guidance. Leaf collection phosphorous reduction has not been

to meet River Slough Winn. Total River Slough Winn. Total calculated yet and is not included in the current reductions.

TMDL Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction144,413 439,439 0 583,852 213.0 959.0 0.0 1,172.0 LFR TMDL Red. Goals

Alternate Projects35 8,728 25.8 24 $393,827 Carpenter Preserve Pond Park now or School property

69 2,408 5.8 5.8 69 $199,546 WE Pond Abbey Ave North X Contamination?

3 22,492 47.3 3 $446,076 PW Cecil Pond X X X Requires removal of Cecil St Garage, redesign, new SLAM

Harrison Apartments Pond Modification

2 44,395 100.7 2 $744,600 Georgia Pacific Pond X X X Land needed from Georgia Pacific

20,000 50.0 Harn's Barn Pond (Georgia Pacific Alternate) Need new SLAM model

86 393 0.7 90 US Army Pond #1 (W) Existing Pond - US Army guy said they would not sign Maint. Agreement

82 366 0.5 91 US Army Pond #2 (E) Existing Pond - US Army guy said they would not sign Maint. Agreement

19 23,118 42.1 35 $720,000 Harrison South Pond X Contaminated?, Reduce flooding on Harrison

18 11,274 24.3 20 $349,711 Taft Pond X X School - not likely to want pond on school property.

Hoover Pond School - not likely to want pond on school property.

Roosevelt Pond School - not likely to want pond on school property.

14 8,571 19.1 15 St. Gabriel Pond X School, would help flooding down stream

52 27,001 69.0 49 $1,589,065 Smith St Pond X Requires 10 houses to acquire

11 40,647 99.3 7 $1,121,532 Arrowhead Park Pond X X RR owns land between tracks very hard to acquire land

81 2,332 4.9 81 $254,012 Abby Ave Pond South X

3,982 Wrase Pond X

Cecil St Storm DetentionGolf course Byrd Pond

Not likely to be constructed

Ponds proposed on park property

Ponds with issues, low likelihood they would be feasible

Stormwater Management Plan

CITY-WIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Prepared For The

CITY OF NEENAH WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN

Neenah WISCONSIN

December I 6, 2013 NAV

McMAHON 1445 MCMAHON DRIVE I P.O. BOX 1025 - NEENAH, WI 54957-1025

PH. 920.75 1.4200 I FX. 920.751.4284 WWW.MCMGRP COM

0 5,000 2,500

ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS

N5e3

N7c5

Fox River

Lake Winnebago

Neenah Slough

Disclaimer: The property lines, light-of-way lines, and other property information on this drawing were developed or obtained as part of the

County Geographic Information System or through the County property tax mapping function. McMAHON does not guarantee this information to be correct, current, or complete. The property and

right-of-way information are only intended for use as a general reference and are not intended or suitable for site-specific uses,

Any use to the contrary of the above stated uses is the responsibility of the user and such use is at the user's own risk.

Feet

McMAHON

FIGURE 7 STRUCTURAL B M PS

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF NEENAH

WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN

[S5a2c

S5c2-4 • I 4

I S5c2-1 •11. 1 85c2-2

I: I Town of S7e5 r

t's5b,s Neenah

0 /

N8b3

_

85c2-5

S5c2 jr

S5c2-3

1

S7c1 r

1 ............- .7... —.....—• - -4 N7c6

Lake Winnebago

N8d5 N8d2

/ Towni of Menasha

;

:N1a5a

Nta5b1_,

.c...._.„=..._= r i] N2b3c ----- =Dr—

N2b3f --:1 tr ._._.=

----.6-i c---% n ....3— r---, ,

1 H II— N2c5

L__I

-1 N2b3e -..Fox River

U ti

1 LL

L I

3 I

01

CI

City of] Neenah]

•••••••••••••••

ao Town of Clayton

L_

['— Town of

;Neenah

Little Lake Butte des

Moils

City of Menasha

Neenah

!PeCi Structural BMP ID

Sub-Watersheds

Other Mapped Features

------- Municipal Boundary

Right-of-Way

Railroad

Stream

Surface Water

Source: Winnebago County, 2009-13.

U

41

AI

111

AI

AI

AA

ors

a

4) Z7--) 4)

n E

a) a

-c)

cdi

6) a

00

0 is

C

3

Town of Vinland

G

ifil . 1-PITI

Viiiiiii2IP

r =41 .4 OWnti

77.7.-.

-- mg111

7,-.-R-.,,-0

r r 4414411.• '11PiP

..e. -,,,,

- 1 --- , tq -- ' iirTirdi

i

171 "fi

1 '1" r i'""i i 1

_ 1" L "I'll'Ilw

, ijiliiirigliiiiiiiiit r11 -2T1 rrlq "f'

Njliiii7Wali:" P Kr": ''

0

ii fiffilillillifil filfililfilpillf

MU UM

11 fi

1 in niglialll

Illifrilif ditroulwpir4 10011011""All

avi-3.n,znihRg; 177pappiriivizp,V211M!, 111

Timlu-4-u ,

i 1

I

1

,

1 ••'• P/

1Z

1 tOla, Fr'Ilil a vP '"'

1 IffiiiiMilirifi

1/Wi ii

ill Vg

”:101-01110

1

l'I'•'''

'27-

La

" d '2

-

1"c—tili f IF

1-

,

I

I KII

FIR .?. 9 .4

A -glii,n1,1. gv2,- -, : LI

..10140046,24retat -.7,4 ls .7.i Itw.4.wig,,:,,:,E-A i

: :--:

54000001. 04-ii;p0i44 A'.4i1 ;IJAr -'-iiEiltp;iwA4t IH..;,1 E;,nilgliTk i ,efi.„ :ni-,..i.gliii ..

PAO _ — 64.4i1- 0005.44AA,4pli -

1' La r

LL ., yIF4rpok.p.11eAS Jt. 40 is-04vmillilpi ,:li,

, ' ' • OM

' 'IL! 1 r... • • •51;; 43;,- ;

6

1? 1 --- E.: 7h

Eti rit**.i..,_ - , ,, .4 ....2,1Li., ,, * ,.. higlazz .r. ,. .4„,,,m„.. ..c.ext -,61....6.40.ALtiiif.m7..4,-.;.-r . ,jr,,,,,,m„cg 1 Iiii.1iN; m ..:Wpit.!4',ii5- .,...„, ,1,11 ".,-.'". lige, ,,g1t djqlga rit=

1

i '

,i 0 1* .1,V EliZE., 0$$1g

RP 'f f ir._- 4112R113.$1....Alp;;-:.[Zi.PRI

7-'7 F1.; 1.7=... .. :-'2,Y1'.1ae, !-

::-.1ritt );KZ

i7. F.d3r,ts's;- YYVv..7-d.).1- - -170,.=7.FV,7,,.F.

-- IVY- .74..- !L7.=. -1',17 ,It 1

z.

. `' r. .......... o pappfr 6i-...i,;,.—.... o..iili

rtik 7 .,.. r ______ „00„.....n...717r(r.„.,. _., cL „ c"boa • -• ,,

7-- - F.1 '' r• 1,7 -- r 0 =- -- ' , [ill LIJ 1 -

11

-- -,.,

HMV .!: ;;g16Gngiliii31 1 _ ‘,...

ii.;g.: ;;;; ti4:.7.41 -'ifg pi .- . .'1-2,4 iTiqg4i - iln ',,42,v11,E ...F1

liv-pk'ii GEEetcEgt1.40 ' 44,-E. .ciz64ti ,..64 .0i-f-4_,siviiii.44%; - --7..., i, „:„„.,, iggvoiTill .S • ia

jig0i; If

il priiirrrlin:00;10,iigi '..

[ ..[

r piailopr

L

- ..." 4,

r• .-1.,rie '- r

L v ,

_,,, r^ _—___ 2 I': ' . : n1;33; 5;;;574?g

giE040AggpiiggiiiigiipOni4;;41iik4f4gni r •

' ,iiiiiiR1316 '1; i 4pitilig i rFliiih iiii hili gh8.38,..,

I 1

. 1 -

i! i li

i

I r

I 1

I

!

I i r

i -

!I ilk

..... . , .. . ... . .. . . . • . - . ' • .1.. • 1.

. 1 f

•E$ • -t i E. .

Ai i i i :

ELA -V:.•7 :giF

... .. . . ...... • ..

I 1 L r J i 1.1 „ pli , i

_ - I i 11 . ,.. F1

-t-, 2,

1 III

L 1 , jp 1

, L i

1!. '1

1 I 1

L11

i i 1 . 1 Ifif

1 1 II 1

op i

. ] . 1 " .a; -7' . . a i ..1 ' i •

'1 1

11

'H. '

I ] I

]

t

1

.

1 1 • ; iii -

, I '

I 1 t' Ili!

H , 1

,

1

!T iT ,.

I 1 1 I 1 “13i , i , ; 6 1 _I ; 1iii

I' 1 5.. .1. [ 'I - I.

I 1.! I ! ,, I ..

i • H .j

1. 1 1 1

. . ,E 1-0,

! Lip •

1

i . ' IL 1 Eil li .' , li

.E1 iii i

, 1 -g5

3g4 I CI 11 I , , 1 , 1 , ;,-1,2,

r , 1 1

_ . • • • • • . • ,

, •

__ gq

I ,[._„ 3".. P

.. I / . . 1 .i.:,..t t.t2.

.k;Fg1 6 11 ' I. ,

g i : - : I L. 1

• - 1 1 'b. • . . . — —I I— .. 2 ' •

.,,, r ;-4'4kPlg-zH;":''-v Zg . .u., -, i 1,,hk,-.,.:0 ......„.. 1 .-„, . 11.t,-... a 1 1 if.10.6„1. .[Ir,,IGE,-,, f t .r ..:1 r d 7,,FIE

-r482 = it- ....S*^-,, p., .,14.

- - ,-.r4 _s"t1;kvete p, .;,,,i,„ .1 _r.. ..„,.

1

iv El

iii iii;00§i5g .i..i __ 4ili,;i4kii4401-ipple It0ii.0 . glEi-.5i ti_OmijitH AlE21;111! ,

i Aiogli0M0i- gi! ''''-itiliA IF ENiAWiirtli2t I

V 1 h

_IX-112d4EC .'- -!a0k; IllEitTigiitiIi0VViI iipi t"ii-Vijiiil

040a5i3iiri fir#4iiiiiL4W4gi , 1...

,,, fO*WilAt ,'1,43;11: ;pilsiA:-Ww. B 1:W ;-411

I L E,i4pqaufs0g; - , i.- ,-;t_ti;j4;apli'l rgu :;615fg• -1,i, 2 ,. i54'5.:Oili;W, U46' ;31;L;iWlli 1

1 [ .' irOMP 61.3 5;. ggrl V ..:441*P-i.--.E

F i 1 i, f;0.11"i'Oii7.7 -1..6 !I ! 7-7,7,,i;li;t'Oil ''''' L.11 -igig;ffOttf!rt:t7,11.1,14111

.-4,1-- -- 1 20.1.5pa - P ;; .8:.; F.41*. ;, r.,,: ;2 Ppjr a ; '*0- ; 1 Itin.hni;[5'0 YvFx,e AO 2 ?•e - • -:•-[:.•,;:, ' -1-7,7::1''111P;ZEAff'' ,,t”,:<,,, ' • .7. k- 05;r4 - '.. '-'1, ., ,11:7,-, :t : -

WA

PR

OJE

CTS \ N0019 \ 920225 \ 1

2 - S

W Q

ua

ky Modelln

Ole

n°

/a,e

m l

ap

( sa.n

ewaliv

)s a

snpu

ei

0.1111111.46.11116 Ilimr4.1•111013191.441-44

330.00.1.41.1 01.14

00.171

1543 1

1013.0 10:11 tintein 11110.6

An,.

Con1031 01:000

.1.nlid 1.61161

1•141141.1 1044.

45:3

Wore Draln Spleni 110101)

Afler 041011 Conlral 1104031

10141141.61 1101110 IS,,

711341.4.34 114,1471

1441

'1.,1 Aker 1122.55 1,4'21 166,950 .• 0911. 559 91 10 11 Nem. Slough 4,13320 1,091-6677 9.17.352 151114 12.1364 1111, 54 111136 174.41 11134 1.04 7494.1409P1 41244 16154 1,9,771 14.205 101% 1.11,15 1419.1 13 94.

3.1411.10 1490,144 4.1.11,444 111,177 1135. 4111,46 1,441.03 11647 11.115.

11.131 11.01•11311.1.4111119(.1144 ••••1o.

Wurrtted

184 rr 5.11118

fibs) 4110-4111

11191 11.01

0101 44431 1%1

11.041104 11161

/41•4490 1116)

1101.1 B1.)

104411 1%1

ImIther 159,612 55.591 103.9 65.2% 252 176 76 3110% 56549+434050. 13033511 1i2,075 521,383 400, 2,14 14/15 036 30 0% 13,1 1.441.1179 417.411 413,451 I 41:70. 1.411 1,440 01. Mb%

CIF I N.A. 61or 1.1cr 01.44.1.1 Plan 0160 No NO019-920225 1/66.110.2013

11. 10101. 1.1101441 Al RI,.

M MAHON LIIMUni=g11

Nreqtli 1411 (1.9111019 1011 4 01 01 101 5 1 .1 174:- II 3:/1161886 610 11 -I Owe 811111N, 6,14.14

14011144 S, man Sob-. Rlerslied 04 81 0 4 411.

1 .4 415 Ripon n4 RI um Marl, Ann IL,3 o8.21fryrW 01•41.1111.3114 3 rl 131.40: 1-1.103.,.. Ap, k 1101134141.5, A W. 0 44 Ihr S4 L raykI01N. 1.100 11 1{'1' II.I. 11%1 Ti011116 .4 114 40:41 MI

91,. 01

I n141 1.6renikd boik_L-111.4 I 6.16131.681.3%0111'1

9111 44004

'15240.1131.1 1-0/.1od

Ar11,1 l...1.-.1

1, 11.11. 7Y1•0•4514.0

At. ..) 4.)

015 M.dd1t Tr N..Ik1

01.8. 1141461

va r.,.....1.• r ,onr d••

MR. lloolo

50.18. 11111e1

Arli F 11.18 69.40 (103)0

8511' 14641110

1%1

Allrr 43,101 6..4 106441

041411.4111 14411.61

1%1 10s1(7418 1192)11

Ado. 11049 Sr.01 111,001

01111 M. S)drni 049 71

863r KOMI 1%1

Mk. 68.11.6 ('4.0,4 11,703

1 ,5.1 1444 001.9

111/ 10 1120.

1711,

8.8110-6 11140. 4140111 1.104544

0.8 8081 t11 0061 11,713 .1

1,001 06680 OW

1140 re Draln 8.1814 111,s/ .3

Afto 00641 L4019011 00,1.1

3.4,4 0111103

f‘6.1

Before 0141n

,0 flew 1113'03

Ark: 11.1. (.011391 (11,5')

14.4 300644

(141

101444 84,4. s)...

i

0110 10.110 6..041 001-0

13.4 9:4641

(%

Hcforc 0019 6,1441 110„4,1

Afler 091011 6.04,690 1111,4. )

1.•01 41.44461 0,0

.140 MAN s).5,44 141413)

000 11060 1191171i 01181

1...004 1019.

8,11

154540 Dm. 93.11, 3160,63

0(08 0.0140 !!x11,1 0800

10. 0..1

3%1

1241,1, 1.1.8110 S.14.4 1804511

411,1 11x0.11 6.1111 /6•61 3164.504

30441 16166.01

(341

- 4 1/4i,•••3 1/11.144.6

BM P-7141

3[....!. R-ii. 7166.116.311 NI.. Slough N.. Slough _ 14861. Sloug11 Neenah Slough

.

,4 o, 11231

'66.0_,2 9304 .

TA) .4EL

_;14.)....

16,631 1S4,11 11171 II 1.5 10 14/ picApio•. • '0(6 . _ SP 1m ,)1 01,01 16 01 1

_Mal ,__Lia4_

3,11%. 65.10 90.14

50 00

1240 ]901 1114

1111_ 90 14,1j_

.24 .-.EV5_

1.14

.0..021 -2 Lto._

_ 0AS. _

9.1% ..,. 0000 _ 0 0%

1129] 43.441 13 II 00_27 %191 1'48

UAL VA

9,51 ) _ ,

. 0.64 P a Om; ..to., 041 !alb N.. nc./3

_ JVIS.6.- __ rut .1__2._._

. - .. T .. 21.2*.

15-$14 --VOA

. uL .

13.4/ wl. 79301 ASS

0.0% 0.0 .a;;

P .. _._,

1,L92. lorroi_ rim._.

. V32-

1966 .3.120

27.233

9,.5 .6111-._OP..-

.t.* ..50412_,

2M114._.

_LI011

. It._ i _

_ I frgr.Z.._

11.2%

IS 48 6]60 ]991

u. 26 26 ]151 1414 521E 322 4894

P-001.0561 •01311L.

'6.. 70-16

. - _ . .......4 -1°L31.

-.A...S. _ __Ert

.....9S9,- 4.M-

__ - .. ___ .

P n61,1454 1551 4_01i 11:R14 1 4J .^ II 733 1 • NIMP-.4a L1 e5._ MNA_

.LINRittaki --..,.10bskr40' F..WM , MliMr___ .1' 14 1!.! .91.4r . Mer_4414 P'41110-711444

L'.ic.. N6111i111 .6,413, .!',..,FM, if'14,J, -

. 3500 .__Me _154# _t9 _a_fi.,_ _.P- 0"9 Mt "; 9448 3110

- . 67 67 _htri_ 4.0...7._ ..SII_ kt 2 _I.L.V Jai 0 ')% VA' _- . _ot .. 3_1 /4 2 626

. J-rp_____EL.... Ma

14,1111

-,V.0.1---thgL_ #0)_ID,:

0 11.1 453.-

1095:

31 39 _LW_ }IOTA _141. 1.011 _22_ .13)

0' .0141-I-.

12 132

.LL14 ILE;

ma 44

MM. UR-- OA

3145•6413 Slough Neenah Slough '01-01h sk1•221 1313_nah s1.34.1 - N.A. Skoigh 5144-ffill sk,.6

- 6488 .4_11 3I37:66 ...AIM_ 94 4

1,41 44300

18 5% 1.!13

U._

-.1. r • •

*5- .. in

_aig. _M11_

654

4i.L1___11,11,1 923

ma,_ ad._ 2,6.

66,2-J__21 .1% or.,. 11 211 .1,.

5.83 14,8 N.? J IP -tt•_Agli 1731 1.31 0_

.118] ._ /110_

7.45

49 61 14.4,41 1Zalp ... IV! . EU,

_1211 I 17

-.9.M..... OE

)lot} X1111.0- 2.2_011 to. :1111_

X1.01 _im. 2&0_ 1-4.6_

_o"_ .i..g. . .. _ink..

.-M.,... 2242

_LID_ it..t.i_ 16,11: Ersy

_11 .1.az.

11,411

_2...a__. ".

tell Van 1343 4911% _p_._. 0

000 - 1...t?_•_ I I 0% ..._;,e, MP- •4]

0.00. 32.73 1909

161.1 7.95 I '12-1.1•12t- tir 2124 II. 1 _1,MJ._

,,,:z . 1 910

103'4 II 22 90 20 52 21/31 104114 _t__•1 'T ' .• tun 4160 6 085 202% ±052 10.451

.11.41050.14 Nero. S1•64111. 1741 vy _376

17.1% 1114%

0 10.00 LLD 0138 it, 941.

9-114 .

. 1321 1.13* 4 273 12.7% 16.41 1134 134111

P-1.1.L'''4e. .. .,"°22.11's2 . - t33.1451 4 _ 11171411,11W11

I'7M-11L

romm.a.i_ _. 1.1111101313 04/41682154

ti1t.iii.ftr • .....a._ 058.811a,g1._ %Dplitli1i,_

791 0 W--- la-- .4, • 7.91 2 376 1 919 18451 7.22

14 111 -0 '1,

209 066 00 19 17 16

6

7.Ra. .11,1_1.__.__

7 /k 026

33% . /.4 141 1511 196

9.9% 06%

_U-..1,1__4 LL......119 ,.

_j EN.. 4,1.% ._ N.Q.

111Ers_.

16 40 va

142

4,762 1.,4._. 1 128

_241.3

_0-- 1.j 906

1813 I 310

199% 0 11.11 rosi 1831 8 11% 000

• -

- 16.40 _426,2_ 1644

3313 ,_.. 1-716

199%

.

_, . 131. _112 A, 23" 1.130

11 8% 114% 151% 6 2% 0994 00%

0.00 _ 0 151 000

, 2-231_ -V.:4i- .mty. .Ltalt. _at. 71_144 PA

.6 10.-41,4 0 1 :1).11. . a .i.n a, _

siiipthmiiii_ K144•14D111014 t10,6,102

4!.3 . 116 -11- III --MA 0 ono 41.5o . • 01.-ek 140 92 2. 22 91 I.00

4,328 335

_2p,11.1L4 ..___,fflx9_,. 3,362

__,:115

..2_4aL.. 3 162 135

...CEN. 32.1%

.0.10_.

. o . 0 • 0

69.19 17.16 1-66

_.5.5,111_, 13.11

. w.. 15.31

0.00 0.00 000

_5.._ , _, _,.. ..

1

Fl.,11_ 349) 041

_Ista91._ .1)1.311

--MA-

21.103 3,362 ns lk._4316

1•415.18-521•58 0-457 ',11,1 4 H5INS242

16243mtqlmit_. 113.=!01. EMI- 16861.151,18011

, 216 209 209 209 . OAP. 0 1 111 -114- 110 0051 103% Ill,

0% 79% /0.r,. 011%

a ro 000. O. 111.0 000 069_ 000

-

- _U1.1_. _111„ 209 223% 11...

6

12767. r1,11. 11-... Ito

(5.m.

,_21.1% tqoj_

...MR .........42..._11,_•

• I

0 9 .

4.11.11 _11.11.,

thrs ... 15.74

1 . 4x4 097

614 450] .

15 84

AM.. 5 71 4491 ,3,141 1,242 51314 0 5.41 4.14 4 84

013 . .40,....__,I4I4I, 1242_ . 41-11.....

14311 ..

7.0% . . IQ 113._

LOP*

- 1.03 328 II

_IL-1. ijq 10)'001

_ 15.8 AL.y._ 0 1 13 4107 097 -

- -

111 9.13611,26 9-0.,s0. . IAO.?!.!61.L1444.lWj 1A6.11ahlit.

P-110111-5107112

NO... AKIO . -

2 29 850 64 72

212 1.801 11 121

212 1,185

94n 0 1.16 1.26 1.160 _

2 29 830 . 6172 7116

2_12 _ j.12,01

13.125 j,13, 9 507 7.76.2

_c...21

42

30024

21'

0311

35.1

26 002

14254f4J-42lliA616111161d1_

KAma_IRM__.

V8mUkilt

10.011319066

23.1% 0 0.67 mi 4141

_MK

613 409 mas

7/0 17.9, 0 00.06 2416 LLD 10 271 tilt' 101., _t2.- tin- 35 21 94501 /EL_ 7.929 '4.04 0 32 00 28 00 4160 _rdam_ 0.5. ____ • 35 23

1665. 26 62

504% ... 11 95 7.,at 01

1.110 6.116 11454 o io.A 16 65 100 44.111 goo • 11.13 I3-1 .

1720

13'1 11

1'antr- .1.. • cre: 911L Lti 1. est 7.43 747 247' 01% ._... 20 76 131 02 4170 90 22 607 2032 364

199 20

_. 14 05 . .. 1.22?

_IV A 2474

93% IOU: 004 1711 14 613 6 113 001 ...

97%: ) 1 4% _

2...ii.-- _ Mtl.-

7%

011481r"tt11-1 210R. t06412 . /.4415./W41-_- MAIRIAAS

1"....--. SIO--.,

IM*14.64 MirrgIO.1.6-.. ,,VOtP..!-R- .. 9.1014411 41:11 TVA?

4-.14.111- /6.1 .1111111/ N11264092411_

.iALEEIV 1 51 1. g1311i1

24 92 4.742 ,.49. 15.901

7 799 35,303

10 413 168%:

0 22.110 20 76 21 76 03% • A.a_ • - , 17.1,

1093 42.571

20.136 0 1910_

4340 _DI..0:

4079 . 131.02

41 79 90 22 607

0:1_,_ 11. _

% !1 ..

100•. 0.1. •

1 1

5.4A fall 006

.212? •.. AO

.1-0 6.4r,

. - .81]2 A.002 200 7 891 2 407 3 198 54,724 5]34

14236 _W/1

13 1,141

WO 00% 0 132.96 30.024 111,004 13.4% 0 98,74 90 22 6,13 2 776 Mil .24% _k 7 10 A 01 6.13 2 726

10801 2,467

LORI . 9.9..1_

1,411

3105

SriggSgIA ttRI60 2C/1.5P.4511 . t•i ,10"811

26 94 19 .1, 0-31,

0#4 ma

1 4774

-140 tur,

0 11,79 3.51 I . • _. 1.I5 7.23 0 11.,

19 31 •••21: 61'.19

.01,____10,114_ 1.3314,

114%

RI__ ii,_ 0

. .55„5,_1 220 55

160,15 16.02_1_10L

11 68 02,11

1.0:2 .13.11

- •• -- • -• • *7,0 69 910 207.17

i1411 gkI52- N4.41104

207] A390 .gloL

_)___01,1127- ..3,3.•-

- • '

Iltr..,.. _n1.0,

_1,5(2_ 1iga

AdAL 206 95 6 ...

NIWASA.1. Mori Mama 29 73 iaL. j.I .6V,Ili

1.317

1.111 al% 0 15.74 n.71 5.381 1,131,101511 41080014100611_ .,

7.0141*1"1)._ ,7:4491@Tio 1464544 11

4.. Wry., _yji_

11.6. 4.0%.4.0%. 8

0_ 31 60 29 76 -

• 1 ttt _ _ AV

-' _.1421 _

27

ma _. ___1-.-

Ay

. ,R.Lt.

371%t

17 55

001 000

- 46.14 13,365 12,219 4p, 11.60

°.°722/01r5.632 PAlleoT.'.8.4 . 16-131AP.S7b1

080 10 15 _Aga_ 18 I,. 0U: 12 04 11.4% 033.8 432.0. 62750 17.914 2710 2219 10414 : 1530 141 Wri4 .

_11. 7 13

31.96 7.11

31 96 EU MD tr•

000 000

,rj..r.s, 114%.

15.60 1.204 Lloa 0.43: 7.13 . A-06 .1,.. 4:6492,3 18 423 00% 31 96 9,0% ...101

_SW

- SVP 459

4631__ 25 12 51.14 0 01

18 543 8,695 1455

1

. 1n4j2 ,. 8695

?,455

__.odb._ __qin.,

. R12144_ . 'VS

3205__. 171, ... 2109 nio

..., 22 02 . __3•. 01

24 56

llt._

LI II._ 84%.

0700.4762 8411410.0243

nig.•Ap Innin. 8.695

-W I

0.0% 11054

0 II .

15 76 1516 1336 0051 1114 )1 0 371%

..k...h woog. 1,12 .44.5.E- I

3,455 1

24 56 .M.319 MA. filtr_-. 011%

- - - - o-zimoridah roomonoloor PM' 1/1./m I ii 000 4,44- AK. too. k.kr. L.4. Wm:43w 13 13 1.901 1.112

65 2%

. -Mg-

04% •T

.110-.31114.- -2REPA--, - .

11 11

111 0

1196 23 81 o NI 101

_111 ...7!). 22),11: „ _1:11..

em .1...A__ 17 95 _ se 7%

410'i

1154

14 33

0. LE1j4.5 --- 10

_%40.- 91.

_,_

001

,4I Z.7.1

0 i IA% 14 29 .

R090

4 50 1 ,0

11.2, . _ 2AL .

%AM 3881. 1 655

97

1213.t.}4.4.11.1La

.h_ _

0% 4324

1 IA

11'33

)4.11

6 11

3215

_Iva._

9104 4.3 011l

bN111L- . 4[].1•1•

4,11/437Ald) M114AAa11301,1).bo_.1(05

1.1,A.4!!!!!1131101 1....1.4k..x.,•

iliewiikiwr

906 5..5 3 088 1449 03.0 ell 1111

1 ..-. le-

-

138.1.81.06 Raciloy 11.1.r 4290

I 11 5.376 274

5,176 278

1°4. 01.4

.. _go%

0004.1 gun

0.0 1 52.3

W13 1121 09 1 . 0,036 •

x lark Ladle. or, 1,2,6 945 04 450 703___ 1' NT • 0% RI 00%: 0a_ __v. 004 99% 1113 103

.1_41.1421.17.1 1.100.1..W. 1.4.-rmta 1,1 8 20 1.671 1_11.1 - 4,451 000 0 050 j_._._ . • 3-41 19.2% 0110

0.0'.T

LAD 1,169 301% sa 526 197'.

1112#.6.06 r3.1eatQL-4 CilldWAI 9-r014..W3.11

'1•4614111/6 _ 1.1•'..WE..3 11133°- 1-4eVetio

•CMA NE. II 16401 20 12 U90 44/1 1141} la 631"1 _ 1169 _20599 57.513 44) Art. - 20 12 12 74

_jam_ 2.017

456 1 111

ID IN_ 1585:

1140 060

521 55_5.5 12 44 1 015 _I.Z.L. -142.9.... 110% 0 859 5.44 1.10. 3.3.8% 000 11,11 _.__ai 1-1I%1 eqp_ 00 554 . 156,

..- 34 52 29.74

7,304 0.461 101_,_ 11.6% _4__, 25,j2 25 24 1113 7_15: 004

-

1974 1437 ,./...:135

.1.40 0461 0 445

II .9 27 17 25 24 741 1111. 1414W11114yr tp,.. tio 1,440 19 913 0' 75,16 2206 -;.M.-. 113, 000 199.4 13.14 21 06

0-4.111,06141 1,41.0 1.1.41•04 17. .„316J____4,211

1.451 _mr.3 LID 0.11% 0 13.01 ._413, _. 11181 110% 0_00 0.01 A .:10, 0.00

-,1.1.__M-P. 10.40

.l.._)1)04

020

'454 'DD. 13.60 13 01 0L4;_,: 11.115.

%MN° 11.7'' 064na7.10 Lake 1y0.334,

10-31)•11•14•111 149141•4454n111 5..34 , .4411, i.a.....3),,i, fake 9.19.1•914

2,411 1231 14001 0 707 7.07 VD 1)11.. 000 - ., 7 07 6 96

7.07

17.111411111.1

..4111!1.111*... .. 1.41140..WAI.10_ . 0-1.7-1.4.151 r3i7.41,woni 1'41c1. -

11 II •• 474 43,14 111-911.- 4_94. lip 010 14..911 o oo , IIM 83_,Z.4 le

1531 Vir -taP-_, 6 679 II -'!14 ---t- -11.01 .411 1111 1.311 000

_ •

1615 11.5% 164 ;

73;

21

.. j2 01 24=

,.:

83%:_.

I, ,,,

113% )_12,0...

13_10 _aad iii 11.744 i UN_ 0 5457 3911 LOO,1,._ ....42,0,54_ 000 • - -

,._,,._, 7

1.,1.02 1

44

.6

14124

1]15

1

:

1.0.1

)6.1 i

n6,111:

- 'IL/ .n.o.0

1,141 9,51p.

1111 1,041

1 618 1144_CT 1712 1524 11 55

- .04.-* 11-519 000 I _ 7.649 11" 0 15 05 ILO_ 1304 0 00 --__ • -

301. 714 71,4 31.15 I,111 .1731 6-140 DA% 0 211.43 21.70 11.1-4 000

1,181': 51341,11 1,41044 . 1 1 10 491 II 1% 101,440DLO 3.911.6.1 1.444 11.1% 13-0 08 s• 111715 17 711 031: 55.1..1 ., CM ... 8315 44 .04 .3343% 4M1 14,10, 441! 144.11 0.3. 13351 sone.* 1,400..1731 1 1.51 476 51.44. .1.149.45 5.1114.13 4.3%

/194 11411.1 lot 1. 10.441 1144u911431:0. 17A 1011100. (910 214 14410.19.1-11.41

111111. 1 MIN. 10141130 19141.1.044 .111119.3.4441. 1 11111. DS I MI% 111141. 14041..4 1:4411444 marliro 151134.14 1001E41 14.4 0.40 8,4,4 14018 0.4,4 Ruda L1441010 01•5114:4141 4,414 110101 444419 10441

009'1 91,11 '.1 Pro.1 1'8.4101 Rey'd 601001 Neg. Ncird 104011 1,44,1 11:911 141.1144 1/194501101 01,i 1141 111151 II:1 0011 1400 111,1 1141 11191 1311 111,1 0141

. yo, 144 417 052', 1 0.0111 15 81, 409.171 ,.. 111 1:167". 70 9.941 14/ 16, na6 Singh 3133!1.14 . 40.011 2.31,514 2293: 111,014 141 039 1043. 404 14.r14 414 14 row. 511,n5.2 442%. 146,154 10.414 .„_11.7391 1111 1.118 MA% 441 1 LT% 411 44

WAPRWECTS 610019 \ 920225 \ 12 - SW Quaky Modelrn MSE,ce9\Waa102ahitV 118.113 2012 \ 2012 Landu. 5 (Alternatives) Page 2

BMP ID Sub-Watershed BMP Drainage System Areas BMP Name

Toi n I Suspended Solids ITS.S) Total Phosphorus ITP1 Wet Detention Pond/Other BMP Coal

Average Annual TSS

Net Gain over 20

Years Obs.2.....

Average Annual

Total Cost (5/Ms)

TSS Rank

Average Annual TP Net Gain Over 20

Years (Ibs)

Average Annual

Total Cost (Saba)

TP Rank .

Area (acres)

Before Drainage System

(Ibs)

After Drainage System

(Ibs)

PBMP TSS

Removal %

After Outfall

Controls (Ibs)

Total Load Reduction

(Ibs) Net Gain*

(Ibs)


(Ibs)


(Ibs)

PBMP TP

Removal %

After Outfall

Controls (Ibs)

Total Load Reduction

(Ibs) Net Gain*

(Ibs)

Water Surface

Arca (acres)

Biofiker Size (SF)

Estimated Capitol Costs

Average Annual O&M

Costs For 2012

Average Annual O&M

Costs Over 20 Years

Capital & Average Annual

O&M Costs Over 20 Years

E-EIMP-S7c1 $482 . .

Neenah Slough Neenah Slough.

E-BMP-87e1 S4al, S4a2 S3d2a, S3d2b1, S3d2b2, S3d213,

Bergstrom Pond (Dayton Freight) Georgia Pacific Pond , , . ,

23.94 244.80

9,347 70,707

9.347 63 515 ...4-4...

8114 73to

1,116 12t1:19

8,231 5,1.567. ,

8.231

,..14.„395 . ......._....... 1.4.4 _

.....1$9.4 - - . . .. 14.4 .._. _ ...._ 174.8 ..•.

50% . . 53.% . 7.1

. 88.6 , 7.3

1003 .... , 7.1

, 86,2. 1.09

,, 1,72 , 55.000

S5.70,000 S6 304 S.8,730

5126,076 wmp.o,„,

5131,076

„ .,p41,..q.c 164 617

...,....fth.r......, so..80

__Ag:,,,:rL.,,

1

„..,2...„ „ 145.29 „...!..,7 .2„,3,,71,,,,

, 5902.19 „1131.,27..„,.....3_,,.

29

S3d2 Neenah Slough E-BMP-S5a2c, E-BMP-S5a2d,

PW Cecil Pond 112.83 34 943 53d2e • 57.1 .12,284 79% . 7,492 •

27,451. 22.492 , , 98,7 88.9 58% thq .. 47.3 . 1.09 . .. $320,000 $6.3111 . $126,076 $4,16,0Z6. 449845 . 93.99 , 3 946.57 ..$471,26 3

S5a2f E-BMP-N 1 aSs E-13MP-S5a2c S7b3

Neenah Sive_ Neenah S1o.mb . Neentds S.194.. . . Neenah SIOUg6 . .

S4el. S5ala, $. 5a2e.,.S5a2f, E•136̀iP,Nian" . E-.13MP-S5a2el.. ... . - - .. . . . .. . ..... S763.. .

Neenah Found Pond Modification .

Wester,, Tovinhanini Pend - . - ... .

, ,, . Neenah Foundiy. Pond

Menasha DR) Pond ,..

_345,87 512 : .

, , 2944. .

46.24

.. §2,2.12 2 028 .4,- , 10872

18 423

76 99.6 Aiii. ..1.- ,,,

10413 18 an .t._ .

76% . ' 70% ,, ,, ,

132%

.83% .

21,536 600 , 1 917 3 182 ,

67676 1,428 8 955 i 5,241..

55.461 1,428 ..

- 8 496 . :15041

274.7 3.3 .. 17.7 32.G.

249.7

...3.3 . . 17 2

32.6

54% 49% '50% 59%

1312. 1.7 8.9 13.0

11.9.7. „ I .6 8.9. 19.0

... 124.7 ... 1.6 8.3

19.0

...3,18............5900 0.16 . 2.01 0,88

Ys.;o6 55,000

5270,000..

000..........$11 354... ii.:29.ti 59,847 55,522

5287171... ii5.06

5196j,37 5110,4 '37

,$11871171 530 809 t. ,.1

' s2obyr, 5110.435

...110231L.. ,..... 28,55:7 169,920 304,819

51,07 11..og 51. i 9 $1.2.5 ,

.......4... E 6 7

.......2,49.4.85...... 12.20 166.59 380.04

....$125„81.............4 . 5954.29 ,

$I 212.15 $1061.03

,)7 52 39

S3p3,..._,............1...

S2a4e koptN24

Nsopah. Slough._

Neenah Slough ... Neenah. 51nshoo

S3e3 . , , , , E-BMP-S2a4al, E-13MP-S2a4a2, S2ala, S2alb, S2a3d, S2a4c, S3d2a . . . . E-11.MP,6120.1 , , B3alf, B3a2a, B3a2c, B3a4c,

Baldwin Park Pond ., , . , .. , .. .. .. . ...

pouglas Pond

oWnl-mak Ni • , ,

.,64.72 .... . . .

1.00,98

.1.9.4 7

13,125

28539

24.Y.

102.70

23408 3 261

75%

80% 75%

3,259

5,788 816.

9,866

2,2,751 ian

7,511

17621, , 2 .445

56.5

92,1 7.6

45.1

83.1 7S

• 55%

60% 56%

22.9

37.2 13

27.5

54.9 4,3

27-1

46.0 4.2

0.32

1.1 8

64

$120.000 •,

5350,000 $5,000

$3.490

, $6,650 :WU , ,., ..

$69.8113

5133 ,008 562134 ,

S189.803

..5483,008 567114 : -

150.219

352116 48,4100 ..

51.26

.$1,37 .. 51I37

8

9 , 10

442.63

91901 8i4.75

$428.80

s..„,52n7, P •.

1

5

B3a8a-R....._...._....F...a..R1y.a... ..... Fox kiver

B3a5a, B3a5.12,233a6L13,3a7b., Arrowhead Park Pond 242.51 71 170 59 578 73% 18 931 52 239 40 647 221..7 198.9 55% 99.6 122.1 99.3 1.81 , $940,000 aq77 , I 8.1,p2 , $1.„12.1.05.3.2.....§12,21.3.... .......5,38...........11 ...........1,285.35...... 556120....... 7 „ .F2g., , iigt, - „ 1t,Ieennh 514

F1a7,.F2ii, F2f,r2:,15 S4a1. S4d2

71". Eland Pon KC Marathon Pond

.,..., 94.18 180.19

29.665 . 41,297

24,676 375.53

79% 80%

6.138 9,200

23,527 36,097 .

18,538 .28 153

87.6 .. 1523 - :

78.6 -

.: - .133.4

,7„1 ,,,.. - 60/ .

,., 7 .: 35.0. .

6 I A

. 52.6 ?1,3,

43.5 75.7

115 .1.98 ,

5400 000 5625 000

L, ,

$6,535 59 731

N. I, .4....

$130,698 5194 626

553"0 698 $819,.6.6

370 766 . 501,134 .....

SlAi Si A5 .

12 1.3 ..

870.85 1,41194 ,,,,.

'§609.3-9 imj,„19

"1 7 ...6

?.01a

502.

Neenah Slong6_

Neenah Slough ..

N2a3a

E-BMP-S2a4a1, E-BMP-S2a4a2, S2ala, S2alb, S2a3d, S2a4c, 52a4d, S2a4e„.$2a4f,..S2a44,52b1

St, fiabriol Pond .

Harrison, North Pond,

,

,

,, ,

41.94

217..26

1M1.57

68,175

11,788

58.873

77% .

74% .

3,218 . -

17 432

10 639

50,743 .

8.71 -...1...

_4.1,441

38.4 ,1

186,8 .

6 1 1-

I .3 ..17

6010 , .,

54%

15.5

85.5

22,9 .. .,o

101.3

194 ..

85.9

. ..9.0.1 ,

; ,87 ,..

s imoop ,.,..

51.045,000

glm...

S9308

s64n..

$186,154

$254677

51,231,154

17141,9

828 816

51,4,8

$1.49

14

I 5

‘_„, ;182.69

1.7.17.93

$663,92

S71.6.65

o. 15

19 ELOMP-S4/11 Neenah SIO,91,1! E43.MP-S4if 1, , „ N,aeo, mai Foteldry_peVina „ 4.15 1,202.. 1,..n5 :IN 1 668 ..,./.... , . 294 ,., ,-. -, ,.. 168 3.2 10 13% 18 • CrA 0,3 55,009 E0 SO 55.000 3 352 51.49 16 5.33 5037;67 34 ••, N5a4 . . NI a4

tlez".1' sIFISsk. N nal SI

NsIli.N5ni /a ..

riftexenvood Ponci 19108 ,

.. 51 551 .,.,..i.„._, ,

41815 • ,....

80% 194)52 ,

41 20 I. .

33A61 .. ,

i 63.5 .

I 47A .

59% .

67.2 1 .7

96.1 . 0.8

80.2 ..

/36 0.87

589511.190 5241 MO 1

5u 195 5 466 -

,_1223A.95 $109 7'11 ,

$1.028,895 $349 711 P

669,262 225486

51.54 $1.55

17 18

1.693119 , 48633

504150 S719M9

13 20

Sibi Neemili Sloug6 52111 . .. Harrison South Pond 422 1 4 30 soa A :vo3 83% 5,184 25,619 23118 69,2 64.9 61% m 42.1 37.8 1,79 $540,000 59,000 5179992 $719992 462366 $1.56 19 756.20 $952.12 35 b14a5a . Neenah Slong11. .. N4a5a Gillis am Pond ,• ,. 56.34 , 13.387 10,893 79% 2,815 10 572 2077 48 42.0 58% 20,2 28.0 . .44 $ ] 75,000 $3.926• 578510 510$253 161546 11.5'7 20 41201, ... ..,_ 5567.12 F2d Fox River . ....F2d 'Reda Pond ....• 49.53 14,283 12 346 78%, 3,111 11.172 9,235 46.2 42.4 61% 18 1 28.1 24.2 0,47 S218,000 54,034 5806117 5298,6117 184705 51.62 21 484.94 5615.93 . .12 63383 „. ... ... .. ..- Fox River • ... ... B3a If B3a2a B3a2c B3a4s. Arrowhead Pond .... 242.51 71,170 59,578 78% 15,835 55,334 43743 221.7 198.9 .459% 91,3 130.4 107.6 2.35 S1200,000 511156 5223,125 51,423125 874861 $1.63 22 - 2;15E19 . - 5661.55 - 14 . IF3c Fox River F3c, F3d2, F3d3. F3e1 Riverside Pond 172.84 40,321 33,573 79% 8,411 31 910 25,162 143.8 129.0 , . 59% 59.7 84.2 69.4 . . 1,50 . . 5665,000 57,883 S157.06 S822.656 503,244 . S1.63 23 1.387,54 5592,89 9 Pal Neenah S199_11t • 52ill_hou 57a.lit,, ..................................................... " -'-'7"Ifi.6 11,728

. . . 9.703 . ..

78% . " 3,p.il"- .. 911'7 , Iry . 7,054

01 1, .I 4.1.6 •

II ::• iN '' !I. ! 4i

57% I

17.9 . 23,7 , 20.0 0.38 , .5 L65,000, ... .. svoli . •• 574)16 $239,156 14184$ . ..

$.1..69, . 2.4 . 399.20 5599.08 . 10 S5a2e-R ,.,, Neenah Slott S491,,,54.a . ..„, :... KC PonAa - 468.63 . 114 601 .. 95 936 - 76% 47 940 . 86 661 .. -.67 996. - 390.0. . •,. .35141.- .. 56% . ..171,3 - 2183. 180,1 4..11 $2 035 000 $17 940 . $'3-58.093 $2 393 793 1.3599.16 $136 25 3 601.16 $664.73 16 B3a5b-R Fox River B3a5a, B3a5b .... Wash inaton.E lementag Pond 40.09 11,724 9,806 77% 2.639 9,085 7,167 , 38.3 34.3 59% 15.9 22.4 18.4 .._ .0.28 $190,000 $3,345 566,900 $25.6,900 I 43,344 $1.79 26 368.50 $697.15 17

S5a2e-R2 Neenah S191.01 . E-BMP-S5a2d, S5ala, S5a2c, $.441,54.d2,SfId3.... . . IScr9119. 0 .. 491,08 125,403 105,628 75% 30,249 ?4,,all 71,679 411.8 3718 .. 56%, , , , 182.3 229.5 189.5 4,40 g,p0000 519,058 $3111.158 52.681.158 1.493,580 .51,80 27 2290.39 $707.36 18

N2a3b Neenah Slost• N2/13/.042a3b , Sjealimpond. • • 91.18 i4 427 20 712 .784,ii 5 4:62 18 965 i 5 250 714 69:0 59% 11,6 44.8 37.1 61i3 5469 000 5540 $106.E09 111429 .3' 0;m01:1 51.ii6 28 746115 .17519/ 23 . 07. ,.

55a2e Neenah SlutA Nttotnah Slough

$7e.7 • E-64P,E5621 S5/11/4 S5a2e 13

?",41.110.yi cm, bivvioli Pond ,., KC Pond (1)

25.32 28145

8,695 fi9.304

1695 51383

83% 79%

1468 14 852

7221 •511 ...-i•-,

452 7/27

43531 15,8

237.3 r.. 1,5,6

2141 60%

'59% 6.3 98.2

9,4 139.1

9.4 116,0„.

0.48 120

•51.90 .:NO 51,315,000

'51,01 514,431

$81413 5288113

$27 IA 13 $.1A73 ed

.4 141,1'9 , 8. 7M2.13

11,88 . - ..

. $19...

N . .,, 30 .

188.25 2,320.10

51,441:80 S721.35

6) 21

B2b2 Fox River B2b2 Cook Park Pond 24.23 8,624 7.198 81/ 1.635 6.989 5,563 23.7 21.1 61% 9.2 145 11.2 0.24 $155000 S3,107 562,134 S217,134 11.1252 $195 31 238.28 S911.25 30 W2dI B3a5b E-BM71,..S7a2

Winnebago u Fax River Neenah Slot!

W2d1 B3a5a, B3a5b E-BMP-S7a2

Pool Pond Walnut Pond Bc7,0,09in Mini Warehooso Pond

2974 40.09

.412 .:-.I1_oit ._

6 800 II 724

5A45 9,806

1.108

83% 81114

.6%.

1290 2,222

188919

, 5,610 9,503

4,255 7,585

.. 919- -

25,2 22. I 61% 9.8 15.3 . 12:2 0,24 0.55

SII5,000 S235,000 .$5 1006 .../,.....

S3,1 07 S4,325 51 811 ..../.... r

. S62,I34 5-8-6,4•12 $312.15

$1711.3.4 5321:492 541245

85.,093 11,691

. 18,385

52.08 92.12

. 5..4

)2 33 . 34 .

. 244.68 392.27 .

. 11,23

. $723,94 S819.57 .. .

51394,36

22 26

.. • 79 i8,3 34.3 62% . 14.7 23,6 . . -19.6 . i.7 . - 1.7 • 503. . • 0.9 ..,•,,. .,.,...,... N7a4 Neenah Sloo,16 N7a4 Cili.79,,I91.P°REMPmd 66i8r- - 13 5..,1 i 11,028 . . 83% .-. . 1300 11 231 fi,Iiil " . 52.1 , 46.4 61% 20.6 31.6 15,8 o.n 52..95,,cp . sl.m.i $98,V7 5393827 . 171,559 .. . . 5226 35 515.81 .5743.51 .... 24

55d la 6.. N

N6cuoh 51rmi... Neenah Slo t*

S5dla ,, , II- BNIP-N3e2,7N3e ..

Neenah indukriU1 Park Pend King Pond .

29.73 - 19.73

.. 5381 1.0,500

1381 81.1 7

" 79% . 76%

1.114 1564

4 267. 7 936

' 4 2g7 JAp3,•

153 23,9

15.7 . 203

. 57%

. 57;',/ 6.8

10.2 8,9 13.7

89. 16:5

0:53 . 9.21

$.11100._ ••.• yxj 5200,660 . 93,345 .

s§1241 900.

$200 ,041 5266 iill

i5,339 . 111 065

4 523 52.40

36 37

178.79 209.52

51118.88 51273,85

, 46 55

SI 1 Nee0alIgink .. SI l' .. .. Sherry Pond 49.61 14 448 12 001 7286 4019 ...,s, 19,429 7 981 48.9 43.5 534' . 229 26.0 ..20.5 . 6.32 :. : $121000 $3A90 569i113 • .,,,5321,803 • 152,021 5/45 38 • 410.20 $955.14 36 N6a2 Fla

Neenah Slough Fox River

N6a2 02o

Publ1F Works Pond , Wrase Pond .

35.89 28.53

9,1365 6,304

8.049 5,117

85% 82%

. 1,334 . 1,135

7,731 5,169

171.5 i..982

. 263. .. 23.8

..23.9. . 2 / Al

63% . 60

9.6 . 9.5

o .... 16,7 . 14.3

..14.3. !./ 4!.

. 0.75 0.31

.$2.5000... SI 32490

559op $3,454

310 0(14 569,0'17

533t094 SZ01,077

- 134,298 $2.50 39 285,81 •51,05.60 1, 79,636 S2.52 40 231.27 S869.44 27

Fox River F3d2 •13d2 Shattuck Pond .65.68 13,745 11,283 81% 2,554 11.192 8 729 51.0 45.5 60% 20.5 30.5 25.0 0.60 ........ 5355,000 ... $4,506 .,.5.90,1:1.0 $445.120 174581 S2.55 41 500.54 S889.27 28

S2ala Neenah Slott S2a La, B3alb . ••• •• I-kla/el Parit Pund , • 43 96 • . ,...., 10,200 8,458 83% 1,741 8,459 6 717 37.2 : 33.3 . 62% . 15.,) , 22.9 , 191 • 0.57 $266 050 S4 397 • • .18.7;243 835 943 134 314 .4..., 8263 42 379,35 59),162 33 NI f ... Neenah Stolle . Nlf .. , cilia Pond .... 34.58 , 7.413 6 129 81% 1 431 5 981 4 6.98 2/5 . 24.6 • 60% 11.0 :16.4 116 .„L. .

• 0. 2 2,,

, s 1 spoo. s2,19 . 556.9.1.7 pas 257 93,951 $2.65 43 271.28 5917.70 , 31 W4a I Winitch_tgo W4n1 finiat N on/WM Pad: Nile/ 44.50 2,515 7,649 81% I.,806 7.709 5 843 35.8 31.5 59% 14.7 21.2,..... 16,9 iii,,24 .., , ,p49,,op .. _53,563, 57,1,314. 5311,254 ,116,85.5 52.66 44 337.34 5922.68 32

N4b2b, N4b2c, N4b3, N4b4, . • •• • N4& . .-.........NeP71§10‘,e.. N461,1s.11 ........... W • Prinmss P9pd 41992 • 91 886 .4. 78.095 61% 35,771 56.115 42,323 318.4 290.0 43% 182,4 136.1 107.7 1.80 $2.100.000 . $9.038 $I 89,262 p,80,762 846470 .. ... .$3,69 45 2,151112_,.3.34 .9.1„059.17 43 133o5a fox River 113.11511

EBMPs: S5a3b, S5a3c, S5a5, (keen Park Pond

- 25.08 6 147 5 127 84% 1. 025 5 32:2 .4202 . .13,2.,.... 2-0.6 63% 85 14.4 12.1 0.29 11.65 000 53.381 $67 f '26 $23.2. 626 86,043 5230 46 241.15 . p64.65 ,,,,,7 ,,,,8

S5a6, 5564, S5cl, 55e2, PBMPs: S5c2-R N4b2c_

Neenah Slo9g6, Neenah Slough

S5a7 15i4bic ,

commerce Court Pond E.x,290sion Whiting Pond . .

4/4.82 48.91

151,387 ,.... „.:, 14,0o4

81 5.26 .. . . .. 11.2.9 ,..

70% . _L.: 7!5.°6... ,. "3375

46,578 ,,.....1.07,808 1.74'7

.......34,948 7 826-

342,7 , 43,9 „ , „

....241.3 391 ,

. .50% 55%

172.0.

..197. :. . 170.7. ,..

.....243„.,..

. 69,4 ..„19.8 ,

6,45 . 0.47 ,

51,385,000 S360,060

$26,963 . 54,034

$539.256 S80.687

51,93,4,256 5440,687

698.956. 156,513

52.75 .7..l.'12

. 47. :IL ,.

.1387.63 . 395.1.2. , .. ,

51,386,73 115„131 „.51

59 44

F-BMP-52u4u1. ii-Jakii%sia40.2. t,i . 5 f... et,4r ,•1 . . . 52nt a, S2alb, S2a3d, S2a4c, 52a4d. S2a4e, S2a4f, S2a4g,

-I- Des.......e-, Pe 6,1)

521441 Neenah Slough S261. 133a2l, El3a2c , , liatirsisontRunglus pond Sri= p9.97 73,683., 63.476 ..80%., ...I 4 442 . .59.24 I 49,034 . 207..1... .1.89.6 .• .59%., .. 84.3.. , 122.8..... ,„,105.3 .. _4,84 $1„750,000.......S20,755._ 1111.. a! 5,M.....52,165,092.... .. 289,674_ _... 52..21 ..._ . 49 .3,105,36 _51,92137 ___.4L, E- BMP-S5qc Nvcmh Slott 0 F-•BMt.:*4' , ,, , :11,kikri 4019 90.1/m116 P9,941 .... .i • '• • 1124 .....1921. • • . ....2 02 .,......1.141. ,... .....±9.,....._.).21.72 .._ _ 10.1 .:... .., • 71. • -.. _,-19,.....„.......nif-:......4... 1.%.....:... ....,..A.1.:,.......- 4'4............ .....;;:ibli- a...,Nr.4....1;,, ••-•Wril.- 9....7.nP..........SA7§..4...., 4... irlq..._.,__,1414,.,_, -759 ,., 8,f164--....iii93?...Ii '#.1._.„ B3a7b . . Fox River B3a2c.. B3a5a.133a5b,133;4611. , Torre,X St. Pond ,.....,,, ......... 194.61 55.525 46 121 72% 15.0.91 40,133" 12,226 - i 81.9" 162,4- 54% 83,6 98. , .. ...71';',.8 1.19 S..1,655,96i) . ... S.6,68.9 S133,779 SI.788,779 61,1,588 52.91 51 1 576.55 SI 134,62 ...1.... 48

/

J27

30

4.U

35.6

City of Neenah Stormwater Management Plan McM No. N0019-920225 December, 2013

BMP COST EFFECTIVENESS SUMMARY

WAPROJECTS\ NO019 1920225\12 - SW Quality Modeling\ MSExcel \Water Quality Results\BMP Cost Effectiveness Summary.xls Page 1

City of Neenah Stormwater Management Plan McM No. N0019-920225 December, 2013

McMAHON ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS

NvF,F.01: BMP COST EFFECTIVENESS SUMMARY

'fotai Suspended Soli& CMS) Total Phosphorus (TP) Wet Detention Pond/Other BMP Cost

Average Annual TSS

Net Gain Over 20

Average Annual

Total Cost TSS

Average Annual TP Net Gain Over 20

Average Annual

Total Cost TP Area



PBMP TSS

Removal

After Outfall

Controls Total Load Reduction Net Gain*



PBMP TP

Removal

After Outfall

Controls Total Load Reduction Net Gain*

Water Surface

Area (acres)

Bialter Estimated

Average Annual O&M

Costs For

Average Annual O&M

Costs Over

Capital & Average Annual

O&M Costs Over 20

BMP ID Sub-Watershed BMP Drainage System Areas BMP Name (acres) - -

(Ibs) -

(Ibs) % - .....

(Ibs) ..,.....- -

Ohs) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) % (Ibs) (Ibs) ,. -

(Ibs) Size (SF) Capital Costs 2012 20 Years Years - Years (Ibs) ($/Ibs) - Rank Years (Ins) (5/16s) Rank

p3a7b-R Fox River B3a 1 b, B3alf, B3a1 d, B3a2a, D3a2c, B3a5a, B3a5b B3o6b Smith St Pond 183,67 52311 43,500 68% 16,499 35,812 27001 171.0 152.8 51% 83.8 87.2 69.0 0.93 51.475.000 55.703 5114,065 S1,589,065 540019 52.94 52 1380.19 51151.34 . 49

1.. 15).- w2c4

Nem/4r Slougb Winnebao

NIcl W2c4 .. .

Schultz Pond • quart), Park Pond

22,73 34.52

4.723 7,305

3.905 6A61

84% 80% .

768 .1.432

3 956 5.873

3 137 5.029

• 18.1 27.2

16.3 25,2

,..62% 59%

6.9 11.2

113 . 16'0 ,

... - .9.4 .. • • 14.0 ....-. - .

0,23 • 0.30 , .

..$130 000. 5250,000

•••• $2,,d77 5'3411

$59,540 568351

S185?g6 5318,351

62243 100,585

53.02 . I

$3,17 ' 53 54

18737 2p.82

51,011.60 133.04

40 47

V.FI2c . . NeenakS,164.. S3d2c . Cecil Garagsyond . . 28,92 8 742 7 799 83% 1 483: , 72_58 6 316 22,9 20.8 61% 9.0 13,9. . 113 D.37 b§i.1,01VCI m• i 6'n Vac I . . S403,431... .126 310 $3.19 1 55 234.93 . $1 717.21 ...„,., 68 N1a7 Neenah S192.0 Nia7 ;Wigs Pond .• 20.88 7 662 7 406 , -.J...- 78% 3693. j, -.ea...c .5.90,.. l,.13 13.2 .12.9 494{, • 6,7 6,5 6.2 0.42 5290,000 $2853. Sf7.4,0,139 , ,5367,059 .111252.... . S3.21. 56. .124.69 ..$2943.88 84 52414-R • Nee.nahSlouh 52a la. B3a lb. B3a2a Laudan Pond . 53 20 12,102 • ., 1,0242. , 82% 2.239 9.863 7 803 44.6 39.9 60% . 17.7 26.9 , 22.2 0.57 $430.000 $4397 5$7 943 $517•943 1566,64 $3,32 57 .. .... 444,17 $1166.08 . 50 S6a2 7 . ... ... ..... Neenah Slough S5d1a. S6a2 ,. , Bell Pond 38.53 8,622 8,622 83% 1,449 7173 7,173 25.9. 25.9 60% 10.5 • 15.4 15.4 1.67 S307.000 58537 51.70,749 5477.749 143.457 5333 58 308.84 11.546.92 1 .--1 63

1......- .kiVP-StiC '4CPPah !99211.„ -BMP-54e] Bridgewood Golf Estates Pond 15,61 2930 _.,2 650 74% 766 1, 163 1 584 10 2 .9.5 45% . 5,6 4.5 3.9 i 16 $5,000 16571, 5131461 5136,468 37,688 $3.62 59 • 77.71 $1 756.18 70

130, Fox River nit Kinkily Point Pond 9.89 2,077 1,660 88% 246 1,832 1414 7.9 6.9 64% 2.8 5.1 4.1 -. 0.11 575 00^ 51.424 128.4J8 .ci.03.4F8 28,280 53.66 60 82.45 5125%07 53 1'7402 Neenah S1,Eg„, N4c2 MTS Co oration Pond 74.01 18.801 16.631 80% 3.692 15,108 12'938 ..-i- 65.1 60,5 6140 •• 25.3 39.8 35.2 0.96 $850.000 $5 594 5111 8811 S961,888 258,762, -„., S3,72 .,,.. 61. ,„703,70 :......„§1,1660_,,,.,5.8_.. W4d Winnebip W4al. W4d Yorkshire Pond 78.26 17.316 13.829 81% 3.297 14 019 10.532 64.3 56.2 59% 26.5 37.8 29.7 0.82 • 5680,000 55,304 5106.083 5786.083 210.632 53.73 62 594.2. 3 51122.8E 56' Fla

dic=ii _

Fox River Neenah Slotah • S3 d2c

Nicole!. Pond .. 43,70 '-'728.92

12.,707 • 8,742 '

10,558 _4 7299

76% 84%

Ela,Flal ...- J., 3,004 .,. 4412.

9 703 pp

7,554 6•167

41.6 an

--37.1 20,8'

F.A.• 6 I%

177 8.9

73.9 14.0

19,4 I 1.9

0.32 0.43

5520 000 .. $li000

S3,490 9,889

• 569.803 Oriiii-''

S589,803 'i36 ii4

•151,085 • 127,744

•S3.90 . .. .... 53.98

6'3 ..,. 64

388.40 238.14

51,518.55 $2.13231

62 76 Ceeil.Gatage Pond 2 '

N4b4 Neenah Sloup N4b4 Memorial Pond 56.12 • .4 474 4,474 • • 79% 452 3.522 3 522 _236 23,6 , 51% 10:3 13_3 .,_ 13.3_. 034 „521opoo 5;563 $71.2,152 Sii112733 70A35 $3.99 65 . .. .266,82 $1,054,10 ...,,,,42 .,. S5a17i Weenah Slotigh §Kil a ,' .. .. • Mince Park Polir • 19:31 .. ..,,,_„ • 3 932 • .1,198 -88% .454 - 3478. 2,743 . - : 15. I il • "13. : il • 66% • 5.2 10.0 •• • • il.T • : 0:25 .5155,00d • -$3,236 $64,723 -$219,723 5969 ., 54.00 ''' "6e. 165.19 $1 330.13 57 W3131 Winneham W3b I Wilderness Park Pond 11.21 2.474 2,079 89% 264 • 2,210 1.816 9.0 8.1 68% 2.9 6.1 5.1 0.21 $22,900 $2 718 $54,308. 5146,368 36,314 $4.03 . 67 102.97 .. 51,421,42 60

Wasinnron Park Pond . 22.91 4.328 .,3.6.? . 85% . 467 S21a3 Neenah Slough S263 . ..3,661 ' 2,695 . 17.2 1.7 60% 6.9' 10.3 8.8 , 0.24 . . 51.156e1D13.. , , 531107 $62,,,134. 5221134 53,907 £4,12 68 .. ... - 176 22 . ... $1;260.58 54

B2d Fox River B2d ' trA,c...t.y WE Pond 13 ..,- ,,-',.,.....', A 13.38 3,899 3 336 76% 929 2 970 2,408 12.6 11.4 56% 5.6 7.0 5.8 0.23 5140,000 , 12,,9,77 ,S59.$46 6192,146 48,154 , 546666_.,14 69 115.73 , S1,724.24 69 N3d6 NecnahSloue_ N3d6 .. / • • .... Cecil Pond 11.87 2 679 2 077 .81% 504 . 2 175 1 573 9.7..

. . 8.1 59% 4:0 5.8 4.1 °• i5 ... -.......e&9,00 .._. ..§..1.a2•,.. i.,.§1113.1 NMI. .L.10, S4-24 • 70 82.66 $1 631,21 65

E-BMP-S4c3 .. Neenah Slough E-BMP . ... .. . BriFlocwood Condos Pond #1 (W) 8.14 .1 735 1 476 -80% 347 . 4666,._.-4666 „ .....,1 388 .. .. 1 128 . . 6.2 .. ..5..6 . . . 55%. ... . . .. 2.8 ... . . .. 3.4 . 2.8 0.77 $5.000 • $5 1.21 • $ l02 455 5107455 • 215719 • $4.76 • 71 56 91 , • SI 088,24 • 71 , 5,3a Neenah Slough S3 a, S3c3 P.cddin Pond 73.22 )4,926 I 2,1 is 82%,.. 2,758 ..112,168 9,396' 57.1 . $1.2 60% • 2,3,.1 . .. ,,34.0 28.1 0.76. • : . $805.000 "55,086 . 5101 730 ..5906,73.0 . . 187,950 . S4:82 72 561.85 .. '51.613.84 , 64 N41 Nccnah.Slou N4l Jewelers Pond 17.95 4 906 4 906 • 82% $85 4 0214464 .,t. 4464 4 021 12.5 12.5 68% •• 4.0. • 8.4 4 0.35 . $320,000 S3 599 . S71,960 S391.980.. 80 429 . 54,87.. 73. .. .168.81 ,: .. .52.322.00 78 .

E--I314-Pc4 'isleenall Slough -E'-B14-F-g:le2i • Dridgewoo(I'Con-ciosFond #2 tE) -8.12 • 1380 1.509 . -80% 356 . 1424 • 1.153 6.6 5.9 . 55%. . 2.9 3.6 .z AI 0 13S .V,000 n413 $1(18 260 S113.262 23019 ..s4,9i 74 . 59,63 .$1.899.43 72 W3122g Winntajgo W3b2e. W3b2g_.. Peace Lutheran Pond 117.53 21945 18423 80% - k 4 455 ...-)., 17 490 13.969 86.2 78.1 59% 35.7 50.5 42.4 0.89 ,51,300.000 S5,558 S I 11,163 $1,411,163 279,321 55,05 75 848_10 51.663.91 66 .W3E1 . . ..._, Winn„clgo W3b2c, W3b2LW3e1 Baziew P9nd 6_66 139.15 26.487 23042.._„, 77% .. 501.9 20,198 16,053 1036 , , i3,4 ii-c 451 585 48.3 0.93 -51 510,000 -4.. 55 703 5114 065 SI.624 065 321.064 55,06 76 966.33 51.680.66 67 Ea 'Fox River B2a Abby Pond 9.30 3.319 2,838 85% 506 "2,813 2,332 9.2 6.5 63% ., 3.4 5.8 4.9 0.17 S2.10 000 5120'1 S44,012 52_666454,012 46,634 S5.45 77 _6666. 97.39 S2.608.19 81 F3b Fox River , F3b

N4b2b, N4b2c, N4b3, N4b4, • • Wheeler Pond , .. .. 5.41

• I 144 898

• • . ' , , 90% 118

• 1 .026 780 4.4 r. , 3;8 -, 64% 1.6

• ,.. , 2.8 , 2.2

' 0.07 575,000

• $906 $18.123 593 123 15,606 -,.,-,,-- 55.97 78 44.57 52,089.38 75

N4b2b Neenah Slough N4b5 Memorial Park Pond .(„21. 224.70 43 80 .-T 36,217 77% 10,252., 6464 25 965 163,1 147..6 53% 77.2 85 9 70.5 4.23 $2 745 000 518 402 S368 048 $3.113.048 519,297 55.99 79 1,409.04 S2,209.34 77

W3b2c Winnebago W3b2c Peace Pond 45,43 2,8,31. 6,679 82% 1,414 33,561 -4664--,.,1

.r,?0 6,118 31,6 . 32 .0, 6013,1,. . 12.5 19.1 I6.5 050 , $55-5,000 S4,I43 582.804., S637.864 105.308 $6.06 80 329.60 51.935.24 74 .g-BMP-N3c2 ........_.. ..._.. Tsieenah Slough _ _ __. E-B14-N3c2 ' "

- CVS StOrriice t Device .. 0.80 - 288 - . - 286 .. 15% 245 43' 40 .• 0,6 - - - . 0.76 13%. 01 ''' 64 • 0.1, 55.000 SO SO. 5.5 eik 810 56.18 • 81 • 1.54 $3 236.57 88

E-BMP • • NTenTit-S:iut 11 • .., . -E-13-Klig2Ta-.. ..

7.-777. .... - - - - - _.. tik:11:17iiy.:?0,0.@:a . " . 230 " . .1'2 " .. 56... -- L80.% _6666.. '138 553' • 366 :. •• 1,8 - • • '55%. 0.8 • • .1.0 0.5. 0.1.6 ' • $5,,000 52,071 541 423 S46 423 W.p ,. , 50.34 82 ,...„,, 9,92 4666, k/A3.64..........,91_, E-BMP-W7a2 ..„. Winnebago „ E-BMP-W7a2 Flerxiago Puond 8_20 1,673 1,159 83% 282 1391 877 6.5 • - • 53 57% 2.8 3.7 2.5 0.96 $5,000 S5,812 $116,242 S121 2-42 17,537 56.91 83 49.47 , $2.451.0 80 Wi-bl ' -V.I'lincillgo WI bl Kiniver Pond 12,44 2,075 1,332 . 82% _,_ 375 1 701 1._ , 957 8.5 , 5.5 60% 3.4 5_6666. .1 2.1 06646, 4666 .12 .5102,000. SI,553 $31,067 S133,067 19,140 56.95 84. 41.49 53207.17 87 F2b Fox River F26 Grant Pond 6.38 I 518 e . 1 137 88% 1.81 1,338 957 5.6 4.5 65°..0 1,..9 3.6 2.6 0.14 „ , 5100 000 , , „ , ,, $1 812 . 536,245 $136 245 ,- r 19,135 57.12 85 51.38 S2,651.59 • 82 E-BMP-N2b3h Neenah Slough E4BMP-N2b3h .. US Ana pond #1,,(NV) . 4.15 . 742, .. 541 . . • • 80% - . 148 594 393 2.5 . • 1.8 55% 1,1 1.3 0.1 0.21 $5000 $2 718 glaciii ., ',. IV.,36a 7,859 • $7,55 86 1330 54 332.86 90 N4b5 Neenah Slough N4b5

. 15,79 .3,799 .2,987 89% .. 416 3383 1571 . 13.7 ..

. .. 11.9 .-, • 66% 7.2

. .. . 0.24

• . . ... $327,000

I. ..I.i illl•

53,107 5.62,114 , 84 13.1 6666. 51 A20 W.„$7.57 87 „

144.60 , ••..,•••

S26666_ ,,691.1p 8.1. Briar Pond .. • .-, N781 Neenah Skillet N7a1 . Harness Pond 2 F.34 2.626 2.626, 8.E.7... '4'51 6464, 2 175 2,;175 . 14,3 , 14.3 59% , 5,8 8,5 8.5 • • .0.23 ..$270.000 S2,977 559.5.i 6 $329.546 43.500 57.58 88 170.45 $1 933.43 73 N4b3 Neenah Slo,ugh N4b3. N4b4, N4b5 ., Memorial Park Pond 161.87 26.632 22,527 79% , 5, 691 .,. In 940 . 16,836 107.5 , 98.0 54%. 49.6 .. 57,9 .• 411.fI 4,23 , .S2,635,000 , $18,402 . $3.68,048 $3,003,048 336.712 . 58.92 . 89 .968.86 . .$3,099.58 .. 86 S2c1 Neenah Slough S2c1, S3a ,,, Reddin Court Pond 14.23 3,294 2,627 81% 616, 2,678 2,011 6466, 12.1 66644666. 11.0 4646.. 6666, 60% 4.9 7.2 (t.1 01_5 5333.000 6464», ,, 51 942 5,3'8.104 $37 i ,834 40,217 , $9.25 90 12.1,93 ...,.,-. • ,. . $3,649.4M $5,

E-BMP-N8h3 Neenah Slough E-BMP-N8b3 Bluebird Court Pond 3.25 533 441 80% 107 427 334 . 2.2 2.0 55% 1.0 1.2. 1.0 0.26 $5.000 5,31272 56.5„.99. $70A49 ,,,6,6,79 SI U.55 . 91 19,0, S3.585.77 89 E-BMP-N2b3c Neenah SID,* E-BMP-N263c Calvn,Elible Church Biocilter I 32 325 325 72% 92 . ,.. 232 . 232 . 0.9_,., .0.9. ,,,,,A1,1,9,0 04 -.S.'5 0 5 . . 620 S5.000 52 374 g47.41 S52 481 4 6,ii8 $11.29 10„ 92 6666..8i $4 823.30 92 E-BMP-N2c5 Neenah Slough ... 39,7...... 1.091 6666 1.091 58% 21 ,4 _. . 637 '637 2.4 2.4- 50% I .2 ., 1.2,, 1.2 2,700 $5,000 57.065 S141,29,0 SI46,2-90 • 12,

6446. 749 511.47 93 24.22 . S6,039.68 . 93

E-13MN,,S765 N ixibdi Sims •• E.-BMP-S7e5 USH 41 / CTH G Pond ........, 2.63 861 661 68% 273 sga 588 ' 1.6 • 1.6 39% 1.0 , 0,6 0.6 1.25 55,000 56,920 5138.400 , $143.400 , , 11,755, $12.20 94 I2A2 S11.543.91 u5

E-BMP-524443 Neenah Stolle E-IIMP42a4 al Directions Biofilters 0,95 330 330 79% 6$ 262 • 262 0.8 0.8 70% 0,2 0.'6 0.6 1.875 S5.000 $5.158 S103.151 $108'.151 5.245 520.62 95 11.30 $9,574.70 94

E-BMP-S2a4a2 Neenah Slough ELfilsi1P-S2a4a2 Winnebago Credit Union Biofilter 0.78 270 2711 , 43% 154 116 116 0.7 0.7 37% 0.4 0.2 0.2 825 $5.000 $2.834 $56.674 $61.674 2.320 $26.58 96 4.93 $12.518.46 96

'Based on proposed street suceping program (High Efficiency -2 / mu, With Parking Controls)

WAPROJECTS\N0019 \ 920225 \-12 - SW Quality Modeling \MSExcel \Water Quality Results \ BMP Cost Effectiveness Summary.xls

Page 2

Ceo

O

Total Maximum Daily Load and Watershed Management Plan for

Total Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids in the Lower Fox River Basin and

Lower Green Bay

Brown, Calumet, Outagamie, and Winnebago Counties, Wisconsin

March 2012

Prepared for:

Wisconsin Department Oneida Tribe of

U.S. Environmental of Natural Resources Indians of Wisconsin Protection Agency

Ft r

DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Prepared by: '1111.

CADMUS -- --GRA IN(

Sub-basin Loading Summary (Ibs/yr)

Baseline 11,912

TMDL 5,758

Reduction 6,154

% Reduction Needed 51.7%

Daily TMDL (lbs/day)

15.77

Land Use Acres % of Total Agriculture 6,302 43.6%

Urban (non-regulated) 1,447 10.0%

Urban (MS4) 5,007 34.6%

Construction 89 0.6%

Natural Background 1,616 11.2%

TOTAL 14,461 100.0%

Allocated

(lbs/day) 7.30

1.57

0.47

9.34 5.14

0.79

0.35

0.15

6.43 15.77

Allocated

(lbs/day) 4.07

1.07

Allocated

(lbs/day) 0.15

NEENAH SLOUGH

TOTAL PHOSPHORUS

Sources Total Phosphorus Load (lbs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Agriculture 8,015 2,665 5,350 66.7%

Urban (non-regulated) 572 572

Natural Background 173 173

LOAD ALLOCATION 8,760 3,410 5,350 61.1% Urban (MS4) 2,681 1,877 804 30.0%

Construction 287 287 -

General Permits 128 128

WWTF-Industrial 56 56

WWTF-Municipal

WASTELOAD ALLOCATION 3,152 2,348 804 25.5% TOTAL (WLA + LA) 11,912 5,758 6,154 51.7%

Urban (MS4) Total Phosphorus Load (Ibs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Neenah 2,121 1,485 636 30.0%

TNeenah 560 392 168 30.0%

WWTF-Industrial Total Phosphorus Load (Ibs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Galloway Company 56 56

80

7,799

Sub-basin Loading Summary (Ibs/yr) Baseline 4,846,168

TMDL 2,848,353

Reduction 1,997,815


Daily TMDL (lbs/day)


Urban 1,447 10.0%

Urban-MS4 5,007 34.6%



TOTAL 14,461 100.0%

Allocated

(lbs/claY) 4,229

678

64

4,971 2,589

132

105

2

2,828 7,799

Allocated

(lbs/day) 2,141

448

Allocated

(lbs/daY) 2

NEENAH SLOUGH

TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

Sources Total Suspended Solids Load (Ibs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Agriculture 2,719,043 1,544,583 1,174,460 43.2%

Urban (non-regulated) 247,820 247,820 - - Natural Background 23,302 23,302 -

LOAD ALLOCATION 2,990,165 1,815,705 1,174,460 39.3%

Urban (MS4) 1,575,942 945,565 630,377 40.0%

Construction 241,223 48,245 192,978 80.0% General Permits 38,217 38,217 - WWTF-Industrial 621 621 - - WWTF-Municipal - - -

WASTELOAD ALLOCATION 1,856,003 1,032,648 823,355 44.4% TOTAL (WLA + LA) 4,846,168 2,848,353 1,997,815 41.2%

Urban (MS4) Total Suspended Solids Load (lbs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Neenah 1,303,458 782,075 521,383 40.0%

T_Neenah 272,484 163,490 108,994 40.0%

WWTF-Industrial Total Suspended Solids Load (Ibs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Galloway Company 621 621 -

81

LOWER FOX RIVER MAINSTEM

TOTAL PHOSPHORUS

Sub-basin Loading Summary iihs/yri

Baseline 237,339

TMDL 114,263 Reduction 123,076

% Reduction Needed 51 9%

Daily TMDL (lbs/daV)

312,83

Allocated

flbslday) 9.01

4.43

1.24

14.68

45.15

3.05

0.75

114.20

117.58

17.42 298.15

312.83

1.56

10.48

17_95

2.54

0.20

15.46

3.19

2.05

1.72

0.65 9.92

0.10

0.86

32.79

3.31

Allocated

Ilbsittayl 11.43

13.53

8.51

47.50

9.49

17.18 0.67

Allocated

(lbs/day) 20.69

83

Land Use Acres % of Total

Agriculture 9,157 17.0%

Urban (non-regulatedj 3,183 5.9% Urban (M34( 36,779 68.4%


Natural Background 4.328 8.1%

TOTAL 53,744 100.0%

Sources Total Phosphorus Load ilbskil. % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Agriculture 12,779 3,291 9,488 74.2% Urban (non-regulated) 1.618 1.618 - Natural Background 454 454 •

LOAD ALLOCATION 14,851 5.363 9,488 63.9% Urban (MS4) 23,557 16,490 7,067 30.0%

Construction 1.114 1.114 • General Permits 275 275 • WWTF-Industrial 107,245 41,713 65,532 61.1% WWTF-Municipal 83,935 42,946 40,989 48.8%

WWTF Reserve Capacity 6,362 6 362 .

WASTELOAD ALLOCATION 222,488 108,900 113,588 51.1% TOTAL MLA + LA) 237,339 114.263 123,076 51.9%

Urban 1M54)Total Phosphorus Load (llas/yr) %Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction

Allouez 579 405.3 173.7 30.0%

Appleton 5,239 3,667.3 1,571.7 30.0%

Ashwaubenon 437 305.9 131 1 30.0%

Buchanan 49 34.3 14.7 30.0%

CombLocks 217 151.9 65.1 30 0%

DePere 2,079 1,455.3 623.7 30.0%

GrandChute 1,085 759.5 325.5 30 0%

Green Bay 4,637 3,245.9 1,391 1 30.0%

Greenville 738 516.6 221.4 30.0%

Harrison 10 7.0 3.0 30.0%

Howard 3 2.1 0.9 30.0%

Kaukauna 739 517.3 221.7 30.0%

Kimberly 830 581.0 249.0 30.0%

Lawrence 543 380.1 162.9 30.0%

Ledgeview 151 105.7 45.3 30,0%

LittleChute 974 681.8 292.2 30.0%

Menasha 1,638 1,146.6 491.4 30.0%

Neenah 252 176.4 75.6 30.0%

T_Menasha 3,163 2.214.1 948.9 30,0%

T_Neenah 194 135.8 58.2 30.0%

Allocated

llbs/dayl 1.11

10.04

0.84 0.09

0,42

3,98

2.08

8.89

1.41

0.02

0.01

1.42

1.59

1.04

0.29

1.87

3.14

0.48

6.06

0.37

WWTT•Indust rial Total Phosphorus Load ilbshri % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction

Appleton Coated LLC 9,645 4,174 5,471 56.7%

Cellu Tissue - Neenah 749 749

Fox Energy LLC 570 570

Georgia Pacific Consumer Products LP

(ex FJGBEI 3,826 3,826


(ex FJGBWI 21,200 6,558 14,642 69.1%

Green Bay Packaging - Green Bay 629 629

Neenah Paper, Inc 2,499 927 1,572 62.9%

Menasha Electric & Water Utility 72 72

NewPage Wisconsin Systems -

Kimberly 20,268 5,648 14,620 72.1%

Pechiney Plastic Packaging - Menasha

001 1,166 1,166 •

Procter & Gamble 238 238 -

SCA Tissue North America 6,971 3,623 3,348 48.0%

Schroeder's Greenhouse 36 36

Thilmany LLC - DePere 313 313

Thilmany LLC - Kaukauna 37.855 11,976 25,879 68.4%

Wisconsin Public Service Corp., Pulliam 1,208 1,208

WWTF-Municipal Total Phosphorus Load ilbs/yr) 14 Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Appleton 13.414 7,556 5,858 43.7% GBMSD - De Pere 5,565 4,943 622 11.2% Grand Chute - Menasha West 7,730 3,110 4,620 59.8% Green Bay MSD 26,059 17,349 8,710 33.4%

Heart of the Valley 11.509 3,467 8,042 69 9%

Neenah - Menasha 19,412 6,275 13,137 67.7% Wrightstown 246 246

Sources Total Suspended Solids Load Ilhstyr) % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Agriculture 4,942,324 1,881,910 3,060,414 61.9%

Urban (non-regulated) 475,960 475,960 .

Natural Background 128,777 128,777 - LOAD ALLOCATION 5,547,061 2,486,647 3,060,414 55.2%

Urban (M54) 13,693,558 4,765,188 8,928,370 55.2%

Construction 1,094,974 218,995 875,979 80.0%

General Permits 79,753 79,753 •

WVVTF-Industrial 2,378,520 2,378,520 •

WVVTF-Municipal 1,133,351 1,133,351

WVVTF Reserve Capacity 52,979 52,979

WASTELOAD ALLOCATION 18,433,135 8.628,786 9,804,349 53.2% TOTAL (WLA + LA) 23,980,196 11,115,433 12,864.763 53.6%

Urban 1M641 Total Suspended Solids Wed (lbs/yr) % Reduction

from Baseline Bas eline Allocated Reduction Allouez 285,657 99.405 186,252 65.2%

Appleton 3,030,547 1,054,593 1,975,954 65.2%

Ashwaubenon 299,242 104,132 195,110 65.2%

Buchanan 28,603 9,953 18,650 65.2%

CombLocks 123,837 43,094 80,743 65.2%

DePere 1,102,905 383,797 719,108 65.2%

GrandChute 524,839 182,637 342,202 65.2%

Green Bay 3,064,098 1,073,228 2,010,870 65.2%

Greenville 373,661 130,029 243,632 65.2%

Harrison 7,086 2,466 4,620 65.2%

Howard 2,220 773 1,447 65.2%

Kaukauna 410,816 142,959 267,857 65.2%

Kimberly 535,588 186,376 349,207 65.2%

Lawrence 198,889 69,211 129,678 65.2%

Ledgeview 66,978 23,306 43,670 65.2%

LittleChute 539,026 187,574 351,452 65.2%

Menasha 1,060,370 368,996 691,374 65.2%

Neenah 159,612 55,543 104,069 65.2%

T_Menasha 1,743,480 606,709 1,136,771 65.2%

T_Neenah 116,109 40,404 75,705 65.2%

Wantindttablill Total Suspended Solids Load (Ibs/yr) 14 Reduct ion

from Baseline Baseline Allotated Reduction Appleton Coated LLC 249,129 249,129

Cellu Tissue - Neenah 53,937 53,937

Fox Energy LLC 5,042 5,042


(ex FJGBE} 105,698 105,698 -


(ex FJGBW) 175,717 175,717

Green Bay Packaging - Green Bay 108,259 108,259 -

Neenah Paper, Inc. 81,301 81,301 -

Menasha Electric & Water Utility 239 239 - -

NewPage Wisconsin Systems -

Kimberly 111,969 111,969 -

Pechiney Plastic Packaging - Menasha

001 3,373 3,373 -

Procter & Gamble 155,432 155,432 •

SCA Tissue North America 136,023 136,023

Schroeder's Greenhouse 341 341

Thilmany LLC - DePere 29,003 29,003 •

Thilmany LLC - Kaukauna 1,122,241 1,122,241 -

Wisconsin Public Service Corp., Pulliam 40,816 40,816 .

WVIITF-Mu nIclp al Tel Suspended Solids Load Ilbsivrl• % Reduction

from Baseline Baseline Allocated Reduction Appleton 169,857 169,857

GBMSD - De Pere 50,297 50,297 - Grand Chute - Menasha West 225,925 225,925 - Green Bay MSD 354,861 354,861 -

Heart of the Valley 147,003 147,003 -

Neenah - Menasha 180,258 180,258 -

Wrightstown 5,150 5,150 -

Allocated Ilbstrfay)

5,152

1,303

353

6,808 13,046

600

218

6,512

3,103

145

23,624 30,432

Allocated Ms/day/

272

2,887

285

27

118

1,051

500

2,938

356

7

2

391

510

189

64

514

1,010

152

1.661

111

Allocated (lbs/day)

682

148

14

289

481

296

223

1

307

9

426

372

1

79

3,073

112

Allocated (Ihs/day)

465

138

619

972

402

494

14

84

30,432


Urban 3,183 5.9%

Urban-M54 36,779 68.4%



TOTAL 53,744 100.0%

LOWER FOX RIVER MAINSTEM

TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

Sub-basin Loading Summary (rbs/yr)

Baseline 23,980,196

TMDL 11,115,433

Reduction 12,864,763


Daily TM DL ribs/day)

APPENDIX D. SUMMARY OF MS4 WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS

Total Phosphorus

MS4 East Baird Bower Apple Ashwaubenon Dutchman Plum Kankapot Garners Mud " • Duck " •Trout Neenah LFR (main stem) WO _TOTAL Allouez 771 405 1,176

Appleton 1,132 , 115 442 1 3,667 5,358

State 1,132 115 442 1 3,667 5,358

Oneida Reservation 0 I 0 0 0 0 0

Ashwaubenon 388 1,829 211 306 2,734

State 388 1,479 211 306 2,384

Oneida Reservation 0 350 0 0 350

Bellevue 753 i 3 1,081 1,837

Buchanan 21 109 404 34 569

CombLocks 4 137 152 293

DePere 516 649 1,455 2,620

State 516 649 1,455 2,620

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0 0

GrandChute 400 1,863 760 3,022

Green Bay 1,485 1,634 20 367 1,235 3,246 629 8,616

State 1,485 1,634 20 69 332 3,246 629 7,414

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0 298 903 0 0 1,201

Greenville 176 517 692

Harrison 321 7 328

Hobart 119 652 921 523 2,216

State 0 0 0 0 0

Oneida Reservation 119 652 921 523 2,216

Howard 1,963 8 2 29 2,001

State 1,953 8 2 29 1,991


Kaukauna 394 32 918 46 517 1,908

Kimberly 21 581 602

Lawrence 41 748 135 380 1,303

State 41 748 135 380 1,303


Ledgeview 533 594 106 1,232

LittleChute 513 682 1,194

Menasha 1,147 1,147

Neenah 1,485 176 1,661

Scott 295 295

Suamico 356 641 996

State 356 641 996

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0

T Menasha 32 2,214 2,246

T_Neenah 392 136 528

UWGB 195 195

TOTAL 4,058 1,637 1,695 2,479 1,903 2,983 53 1,031 1,045 2,513 4,687 531 1,877 16,490 1,788 44,770

133

Total Suspended Solids

Oita East . Bated ' a0 Ate:. Ashy:46mm Dutchman Plum Kankapot Garners Mud Duck Trout Neenah LER (main stem) LGB TOTAL Allouez 266,978 99,405 366,383 Appleton 381,481 73,698 268,047 274 1,054,593 1,778,092

State 381,481 73,698 268,047 274 1,054,593 1,778,092 Oneida Reservation 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ashwaubenon 149,501 713,144 74,182 104,132 1,040,960

State 149,501 576,630 74,182 104,132 904,446 Oneida Reservation 0 136,514 0 0 136,514

Bellevue 307,059 1,579 321,956 630,594

Buchanan 5,525 40,876 242,762 9,953 299,116

CombLocks 1,412 83,756 43,094 128,262

DePere 164,228 197,827 383,797 745,853

State 164,228 197,827 383,797 745,853

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0 0

GrandChute 120,013 1,011,480 182,637 1,314,130

Green Bay 671,482 631,411 5,829 120,154 422,330 1,073,228 198,351 3,122,785

State 671,482 631,411 5,829 22,369 113,402 1,073,228 198,351 2,716,073

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0 97,785 308,928 0 0! 406,713

Greenville 91,315 130,029 221,344

Harrison 186,222 2,466 188,688

Hobart 22,955 209,829 218,360 87,586 538,730

State 0 0 0 0 0

Oneida Reservation 22,955 209,829 218,360 87,586 538,730

Howard 702,063 1,472 773 10,082 714,390

State 698,560 1,472 773 10,082 710,887

Oneida Reservation 3,503 0 0 0 3,503

Kaukauna 142,665 9,072 399,600 27,167 142,959 721,463

Kimberly 12,701] 186,376 199,077

Lawrence 12,785 189,134 43,322 69,211 314,452

State 12,785 189,134 43,322 69,211 314,452


Ledgeview 163,523 169,251 23,308 356,082

LittleChute 190,022 187,574 377,596

Menasha 368,996 368,996

Neenah 782,075 55,543 837,618

Scott 85,724 85,724

Suamico 107,140 190,877 298,017

State 107,140 190,877 298,017

Oneida Reservation 0 0 0

T Menasha 18,277 606,709 624,986

T_Neenah 163,490 40,404 203,894

UWGB 75,193 75,193

TOTAL 1,573,271 632,990 497,036 846,966 559,418 1,086,449 14,597 441,888 626,306 1,389,118 1,524,349 89,058 945,565 4,765,187 560,227 15,552,425

134

Neenah WISCONSIN Neenah WISCONSIN

N/L of the NE X of SOLtiOa 6

North .14 Corner S 89'39%38' W 2610.25' Fo. Section 6, 1'19N. R17E

(Railroad Spike FNEI) '- Northeast Corner

v.., Lot 8.3 1- L. Section 6, T 9N, R11 5.'. VI Eiltecresli Estates

(Aluminum Cty Alan. 1...'..la°1,_, IN 89°25'07" E i C/I *- - cri

Existing

8 Lot 1

!"'s Za 111

•"

N 89'25"07* E

13,510 Square Fast I

10'

e: ' .

Lot 1 • 1- gl

• ply 2121

• •

(ner

- Lot 2 24,14 Square Feel

N elf25.0r E

135.11.' un

Lot 3 41,992 Square Fest

L0,1)2\

- CSM 5727

Ito •

Center of Section )

7Jurninurn Mon END) -.•- Section 'MN Ri7Fok - • — •

z - - - !,s-• lgo-ig-8 • r • " ta C.3 • • • • r 31 • ' 1 ' ' • ' • io 10 IJ - - '

Q

135 10' 0

eu/i

4DO

CIl e

S

O

• " • a • '

N 89°13'23" E

135.11'

Nature Trait Drive

1

cp

LO

r6-

0

ti

m

C.P1 i Let

O

30' 30'

Department of Public Works 211 Walnut St. P.O. Box 426 Neenah WI 54957-0426

Phone 920-886-6241 e-mail: [email protected]

GERRY KAISER, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: March 21, 2018

TO: Mayor Kaufert, and Members of the Public Services and Safety Committee

FROM: Gerry Kaiser, Director of Public Works

RE: Assessable Frontage Review – Eaglecrest Estates Plat 1585 and 1589 Remington Road

This memo is a follow-up to discussion at the meeting on March 13, 2018, where the Committee reviewed an adjustment for special assessment billing for 1589 Remington Road. As was noted, the owner of that property addressed the Council at the public hearing for the Nature Trails street construction project regarding the assessable frontage for his lot. Mayor Kaufert noted that he had received a similar request from a different property owner who has a large portion of wetlands on his property. Committee directed staff to review the plat to see if there are any other similar situations. Staff has done that and there are only these two - 1585 and 1589 Remington Road. In both cases, delineated wetlands impact the full use of the property. In the absence of options for mitigation or changes to wetlands development regulations, development of these areas is very unlikely. There is no specific ordinance provision that requires that wetlands be considered in determining assessable frontage for street improvements. However, it becomes difficult to consider this parcel in its entirety as benefitting from the public improvement. Because of that, I am requesting that Committee consider altering the typical assessment charge for this lot. 1585 Remington Road - This is Lot 2 of CSM 7158. This lot has an assessable frontage of 183.17 feet on Remington Road. The northerly half of the lot is delineated wetlands. 1589 Remington Road – This is Lot 3 in CSM 7158. Under standard practice this is considered a corner lot with a short-side frontage on Nature Trail Drive and a long-side frontage on Remington Road. The short-side frontage is 135.11 feet. The long-side assessable frontage, incorporating the corner lot adjustment in 13-5(i)(1)c of the municipal code, is 210.56 feet. Wetlands have been delineated over the southerly two-thirds of the lot. Staff suggests assessing these lots based on the calculation dictated by ordinance but charging the homeowners an amount in line with a typical lot. In the case of 1585 Remington, the charge would be based on 100 feet of frontage. In the case of 1589 Remington, the charge would be based on a corner lot with a long side of 135.11 feet on Nature Trail Drive and a short side of 110 feet on Remington Road for a total assessable frontage of 155.04 feet. In each case, the difference between the total calculated special assessment and the amount billed to the property owner would be held as a deferred assessment against the property should the






Existing

8 Lot 1

!"'s Za 111

•"

N 89'25"07* E


10'

e: ' .

Lot 1 • 1- gl

• ply 2121

• •

(ner


N elf25.0r E

135.11.' un


L0,1)2\

- CSM 5727

Ito •

Center of Section )



Q

135 10' 0

eu/i

4DO

CIl e

S

O

• " • a • '

N 89°13'23" E

135.11'

Nature Trait Drive

1

cp

LO

r6-

0

ti

m

C.P1 i Let

O

30' 30'






Existing

8 Lot 1

!"'s Za 111

•"

N 89'25"07* E


10'

e: ' .

Lot 1 • 1- gl

• ply 2121

• •

(ner


N elf25.0r E

135.11.' un


L0,1)2\

- CSM 5727

Ito •

Center of Section )



Q

135 10' 0

eu/i

4DO

CIl e

S

O

• " • a • '

N 89°13'23" E

135.11'

Nature Trait Drive

1

cp

LO

r6-

0

ti

m

C.P1 i Let

O

30' 30'

wetlands area be developed. This approach protects the property owners from paying a special assessment beyond their benefit while also protecting the other Nature Trails/Eaglecrest property owners from making up the difference in special assessment charges. Staff recommends that Committee approve the alternate billing method presented and defer the portion of assessment that is affected by wetlands for 1585 Remington Road and 1589 Remington Road.

J>`GPIVO`[THEXE`TWWG`Pmgirwiw xs TWWG`4<365; Pmgirwiw1hsg|

Public Services & Safety Committee March 27, 2018

BEVERAGE OPERATOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS:

New or Renewal Last Name, First, M.I. Municipality Place of BusinessNew Baird, Taegen A. Neenah Applebee’s Grill & BarNew Boettcher, Patrick T. Grand Chute Uncorked BistroNew Delver, Andrea V. Neenah Gord’s PubNew Fraley, Chelsea R. Appleton Sidetracked Bar & GrillNew Harttert, Jason S. Neenah ZuppasNew Jambretz, Victoria E. Neenah BayPoint Bar & GrillNew Oldenburg, Joseph M. Menasha Lion’s Tail Brewing Co.New Wipfli, Sean P. Menasha Tobacco Outlet

BEVERAGE OPERATOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS – Delinquent Payment

New or Renewal Last Name, First, M.I. Municipality Place of BusinessNew Miller Jr., Michael R. Neenah Mr. D’s

TEMPORARY CLASS “B” (PICNIC) LICENSE BEER & WINE APPLICATION:

Applicant Name of Event Beer/Wine Location Date(s) of EventBergstrom MahlerMuseum

Arts Festival –Raise Your Glass

Beer & Wine(BLB)

165 N Park Ave July 15, 2018

CPC-14156;O

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY CLASS "B"/"CLASS B" RETAILER'S LICENSE

See Additional Information on reverse side. Contact the municipal clerk if you have questions.

FEE $ 1G 00

Application Date: 3'__ - I '3

1:1 Town ❑ Village 0 City of Neenah County of Winnebago

The named organization applies for: Check appropriate box(es).

0 A Temporary Class "B" license to sell fermented malt beverages at picnics or similar gatherings under s. 125.26(6), Wis. Stets

A Temporary "Class B" license to sell wine at picnics or similar gatherings under s. 125.51(10), Wis. Stat.

at the premise described below during a special event beginning Jai" /C, Z4/I rand ending tlt• ey 5: 2̀"air-ld agrees to comply with all law, resolutions, ordinances and regulations (state, federal or local) affecting the sale of fermented malt beverages and/or wine if the license is granted.

1. ORGANIZATION (check appropriate box),Z.Bona fide Club 0 Church 0 Lodge/Sociely 0 Veteran's Organization 0 Fair Association

(a) Name Ter_creLYY1 .- fii.40 ice_ fit itSc- g t fv.‘ . 1A) C .... (b) Address /4.< Al Peozie.. Av e -

(Street) 0 Town 0 Village 0.. City

(c) Date organized i a stl (d) If corporation, give date of incorporation / f 5 7 , (e) Names and addresses of all officers:

President MI ci4AC-4.- VAN1 &Tar-) Svc) ,-s./._-_, Ii,,„,,-- (3,_ ki-n, 8,, 9,,, kJ / Li/i3‘,

Vice President rit\j'C i-LAgt- MP-1 LA 14 i'l A,1 70Fc e7.-••OA , le-e' .44 wi ../&"/-6'.1. Secretary .1-1.4-PCie.1 i-icti&--c-k-C-) 5q/ --- /1/74e'rAJ ,W As-,--e- fife-e Pi.. kt.e-4,- / 511V. ,-c, Treasurer t\..) n % AivN• (I44-.s if- 3/4M) / N . 02-.4zire 4111,11 ,̂4 4--1 5 l'ffil

(f) Name and address of manager of person in charge of affair ---I-ettn.iet-f iie.l.SDAJ 1, '-ijkliSki-re A/ LZ A, N--, E-cit

2. LOCATION OF PREMISE WHERE BEER

N AND OR' $31NE WILL BE SOLD: AND

(a) Street number i 6, c--- N. A[2._1( A 1 v 61v 4 C (b) Lot At/e-c-,Ine LA ti,../ NJ Block

(c) Do premises occupy all or part of building? 4 4-4— (d ) If part of building, describe fully all premises covered under this application, which floor or floors, room or rooms, license is

to cover:

(a) List name of the event rz,T5--7-i V4 L-- PArt5C ', 6"f2-- 1' 55 3. NAME OF EVENT

IE5 yy A pr

DECLARATION

The Officer(s) of the organization, individually and together, declare under penalties of law that the information provided in this application is true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief.

60/257-eorr, - 111“Sec-sfiet.

Officer 5/70 Officer

(Name at Organization)

(Signature/Dale) (Signature/Date)

Officer Officer (Signature/Dale) (SrEtneloreIDele)

(b) Dates of event T/

Date Copied to Police Captain Gonzalez:

Date Filed with Clerk:

Date Granted by Council:

AT-315 (R. 4-09)

Date Reported to PSSC/Council: 3-J7-IS I License No.

Wisconsin Department of Revenue

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY CLASS "B"/"CLASS B" RETAILER'S LICENSE

See Additional Information on reverse side. Contact the municipal clerk if you have questions.

FEE $ 1 0 0 0 Application Date: 3 076

❑ Town ❑ Village IE City of Neenah County of Winnebago

The named organization applies for: Check appropriate box(es).

gf A Temporary Class "B" license to sell fermented malt beverages at picnics or similar gatherings under s. 125.26(6), Wis. Stats

A Temporary "Class B" license to sell wine at picnics or similar gatherings under s. 125.51(10), Wis. Stat.

at the premise described below during a special event beginning %u L/ 2(.43" and ending j 417 IC, 21̀ land agrees to comply with all law, resolutions, ordinances and regulations (state, federal or local) affecting the sale of fermented malt beverages and/or wine if the license is granted.

1. ORGANIZATION (check appropriate box)., Bona fide Club 0 Church 0 Lodge/Society 0 Veteran's Organization 0 Fair Association

(a) Name .--ge-eo ge0 11 - /'114(.I it ilL. 4sc--ze , A t TiA C _.., (b) Address /625 AL PAck_ A ye ,

(Street)

(c) Date organized las-4/ (d) If corporation, give date of incorporation / f C-6 (e) Names and addresses of all officers:

President all/ C1-(41--4,-- VArQ A›Tarj Svc) csi-i---.4,,,,Ar fa,- k --m g,-4, L7 4<_, / (//31,

Vice President 1Y\ (C t-t A -61.- AA r--1 CA 14 N /V4'7 bk lily 04 , P-e- i,-.7 A.) 1 3,7‘/-4/

Secretary 0 AI T-LA-EQ... iv \Iv 1.4,1t-c-cIe_.) 6-V / --• - /,/ /5 e i /..) , `,V AL tv .., ,,,,, Gi , e,.4..-- / 5 iv,-5--(c, Treasurer t\-) i-t t % A.,v-. R Ar4 (..:17 3 4 e 0 / N • G24zfrve 4.04•/4 /V '""/ 5 Lig./ i

(f) Name and address of manager of person in charge of affair --14rpto. / i./C,1.clit\:/ -7- b `1- yeg MI rre P.' cL

3. NAME OF EVENT (a) List name of the event

(b) Dates of event 7/ 215^ ( V4 L.-- - be,er2.61Ass

DECLARATION

The Officer(s) of the organization, individually and together, declare under penalties of law that the information provided in this application is true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief.

7C- 2615Trzom - ANA tkelFra-- 144(4.St -cov• C

Officer .44 /74714' Officer

(Namo of Organizatio))

(Signature/Date) (Signature/Dato)

Officer Officer (Signaturo/Dato) (Signaturo/Dato)

Date Copied to Police Captain GonzaleZ:

Date Filed with Clerk: Date Reported to PSSC/Council: J 7- I

0 Town ❑ Village a City

WIZ it It- 4-, Lt.) 2. LOCATION OF PREMISE WHERE BEER AND OR NINE WILL BE SOLD:

(a) Street number / 7 c-- Ai . 42.1( A v cev 4 C (b) Lot laeliejle LA IA) N../ Block

(c) Do premises occupy all or part of building? ..-4____-- (d) If part of building, describe fully all premises covered under this application, which floor or floors, room or rooms, license is

to cover:

Date Granted by Council:

AT-315 (R. 4-09)

License No.

Wisconsin Department of Revenue

Neenah WISCONSIN

Neenah WISCONSIN Neenah WISCONSIN

Department of Public Works 211 Walnut St. P.O. Box 426 Neenah WI 54957-0426

Phone 920-886-6241 e-mail: [email protected]

GERRY KAISER, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: March 22, 2018

TO: Mayor Kaufert, and Members of the Public Services and Safety Committee

FROM: Gerry Kaiser, Director of Public Works

RE: Public Works General Activity

1) Contract 8-17 (Commerce Court Pond) – Pipe installation is complete. The contractor

has started to work on expanding the detention pond. Excavated soil is being placed on the south slope of Bell Street.

2) Contract 1-18 (Andrew, Richard, Geiger, Whiting) – We Energies started gas relocation work on March 19. The contractor has mobilized and started work on March 22.

3) Contract 2-18 (Cecil, Adams) – A pre-construction meeting was held on March 9. The contractor intends to start work on Adams Street after utility work on Contract 1-18 is complete.

4) Contract 3-18 (Nature Trails/Eaglecrest) – An informational meeting with Eaglecrest residents was held on March 12. The project was advertised for bid on March 21. The bid opening is scheduled for April 4.

5) City Hall Boilers – Three proposals have been received. Building Manager Fischer is reviewing the scope with the low cost proposer before a request is brought to Council.

6) Bergstrom Road Street Lighting - Street lights have been installed and are being wired.

7) Winnebago County Clean Sweep – On line appointments are being accepted for the clean sweep event to be hosted in Neenah on June 9. The web address is www.WinnebagoCountyCleanSweep.com. The link is listed on the city website.