review paper on wind power generation - ijmcs filereview paper on wind power generation jaswinder...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Modern Computer Science (IJMCS) ISSN: 2320-7868 (Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, June, 2015
RES Publication © 2012 Page | 94 http://ijmcs.info
Review Paper on Wind power generation
Jaswinder Singh M.E (E.E)
Chandigarh University, Gharuan
Mohali, India
E-mail: [email protected]
Sunny Vig Assistant professor, EEE department
Chandigarh University, Gharuan
Mohali, India
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: The wind power technology is highly developed in many countries in recent years. Manny types of research field in modern power
system such as a wind speed prediction, modelling of wind generator, stability of system are emphasized with the consideration of wind power.
Due to the increasing the penetration level in power system, the different researcher use the different method for maintaining the stability of
system. The wind power is a energy source which is variable in nature. The output of wind power plant effects the grid operation. Because the
wind is not constant all time in day. This paper is review on wind power generation and controllers which improve the voltage profile of system
and make the system more stable.
Keywords: parallel and series compensation, PV and PQ curves and FACTS device.
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the size of the size of wind turbines and wind
farms is increased vary widely. Due to this the large amount of
wind power is generated. But in wind power generation some
factor affects the performance of wind power. These factors are
voltage sag, voltage swell and harmonic generation. But the
researcher used the different controller for reduce these all
unwanted signals. In wind power generation system, basically
induction generator is used because the induction machine
consumes reactive power. The synchronous generator is also
used for wind power generation. The wind power generation is
double in every year in china. Because due to the limitation of
fossil foils and enviourement issues. The wind power
generation is pollution and carbon free energy. This paper is
review on series and parallel compensation and voltage
instability is also discussed. In this paper we discussed about
the different controllers which improve the system
performance.
II. LITTIRATURE SURVEY
For voltage stability, the second generation fact device are
used which compensates and balance the power flow in lines.
The interline power flow controller (IPFC) is used for
controlling the power in lines. The interline power flow
controller consist a voltage source converter based facts
controller for series compensation. The reactive voltage
injected by individual voltage source converter can be
controlled to regulate the active power flow in the line. In this
system 4-Bus system is present. The open and closed loop
model is developed and used for simulation [4]. For
controlling the power in line, the IPFC is developed using
series coupling transformer and comparison of active and
reactive power of transmission line with and without IPFC is
presented using the proposed circuit model. In this model SSSC
is used .One on each line of two lines. MATLAB with simulink
and SIM POWER SYSTEM tools are used for simulation of
transmission line. The IPFC is open loop and closed loop
configuration [5]. The interline power flow controller is a
voltage source converter based flexible ac transmission system
controller for series compensation with unique capability of
power flow management among the multiline transmission
system of a substation.
In this system, for voltage stability, the second generation
fact device are used which compensates and balance the power
flow in multiline. The interline power flow controller (IPFC) is
used for controlling the power in lines. The interline power
flow controller consist a voltage source converter based facts
controller for series compensation. The reactive voltage
injected by individual voltage source converter can be
controlled to regulate the active power flow in the line. In this
system 4-Bus system is present. The open and closed loop
model is developed and used for simulation [4]. For
controlling the power in line, the IPFC is developed using
series coupling transformer and comparison of active and
reactive power of transmission line with and without IPFC is
presented using the proposed circuit model. In this model SSSC
is used .One on each line of two lines. MATLAB with simulink
and SIM POWER SYSTEM tools are used for simulation of
transmission line. The IPFC is open loop and closed loop
configuration [5].
III.FACTS DEVICES FOR WIND POWER STABILITY
Facts are standing for flexible AC transmissions system. The
philosophy of facts devices is use a power electronic equipment
to control the power flow in multiline. The facts devices are
basically two types. One is first generation facts device which
are static var compensator (SVC), STATCOM. The second
generation facts devices is unified power flow controller
International Journal of Modern Computer Science (IJMCS) ISSN: 2320-7868 (Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, June, 2015
RES Publication © 2012 Page | 95 http://ijmcs.info
(UPFC), interline power flow controller (IPFC), static
synchronous series compensator (SSSC). When we compare
the performance of first and second generation facts devices,
the second generation facts devices give the better performance
as compare to first generation because they control the power
in multiline. In figure no.1 shows the summary of different
controllers.
Figure1. Summary of Different fact controller [2]
The unified power flow controller controls the phase angle
and transmission line impedance. The unified power flow
controller connected to line through coupling transformer. The
interline power flow controller is also similar to unified power
flow controller but the difference is in unified power flow
controller is shunt-series controller. But the interline power
flow controller is series-series controller. The voltage source
converter in unified power flow controller STATCOM and
SSSC. But in the interline power flow controller, both voltage
source converter work as a static synchronous series
compensator.
IV. WIND POWER PLANT VOLTAGE STABILITY
EVALUATION
The voltage stability is the ability of power system to
maintain the voltage within acceptable limit after being
subjected to disturbance from the giving initial conditions.
Basically the voltage stability is the ability of power system to
maintain the equilibrium between the supply and load demand.
When the voltage is suddenly rise and fall in some buses then
this is called voltage instability. When the load is suddenly
loosed or the transmission line is suddenly tripped. Then the
voltage is suddenly increase due to this the line equipment are
damaged. Basically the voltage stability is varying during the
event; this can be short term (< 1 minute) and some time it may
be evolve during many hours.
V. PV AND VQ CAPABILITY CURVE
When we measure the rated operating conditions of wind
power plant to the voltage collapse, then we conduct the PV
capability curves. In large systems, the output power of group
of generators is varied; the other generator is reduced by the
same amount of power to develop zero additional power.
Basically the wind power plant is generally operated from low
wind speed to high wind speed with a pair of P&Q from the PQ
characteristics. Mostly winds turbines are built with the
capability of vary the reactive power. The PV curve which is
shown in fig.2 and fig.3 show the reactive power comparison at
infinite buses. .For this curve, we use a single turbine. The
double-fed induction generator 1.5 MW rating used and power
factor is 1.0.The total output power is 204 MW. The VQ
capability curve is normally used to determine the reactive
power adequacy. For positive sequence load flow, we observe
three conditions.
1. In first conditions, both parallel lines connecting with
infinite bus and online substation transformer.
2. The stiff power system network with reduction of infinite
bus voltage by 4%.
3. In third conditions, we remove online parallel lines and
substation transformer.
When we increase the generation from 50% to 100%, the
load flow does not converge. The voltage collapse is indicating
only when the system reaches the instability conditions.
VI. IMPACT ON THE VOLTAGE MAGNITUDE
When we vary the active and reactive power output of wind
power plant magnitude and phase angle is changed as the real
and reactive power generation varies. The voltage is maintained
in the range of (0.95 p.u.< v < 1.05 p.u.). in fig.2 and 4 shows
the reactive power output has major impact as compare to the
real power output impact. But when the generator is operated at
unity power factor, real power output is varied from 0.5 to 1.4
p.u. The figure.3 represents the effect of reduction in voltage.
VII. INTERLINE POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
FOR WIND POWER PLANT
For controlling the active and reactive power of wind power
plant many facts devices are used. These devices are static var
compensator, STATCOM, unified power flow controller, static
synchronous series compensator (SSSC) and interline power
flow controller (IPFC). But the interline power flow controller
give better result as compare to other controllers. Because
interline power flow controller control the power in multiline as
compare to other controller control the power in only a single
International Journal of Modern Computer Science (IJMCS) ISSN: 2320-7868 (Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, June, 2015
RES Publication © 2012 Page | 96 http://ijmcs.info
line. In the interline power flow controller consist a two static
synchronous series converter. The interline power flow
controller connected to lines with coupling transformer. In
figure.5 shows the configuration of interline power flow
controller. The interline power flow controller is second
generation facts device. When we use both two static
synchronous series compensator, they work as a interline power
flow controller.
Figure2. Configuration of interline power flow controller [7]
VIII. CONCLUSION
In the modern wind power plant converters, the wind turbine
generators are equipped with power converter to allow variable
speed operation. In this paper basically discussed about the PV
and PQ curves. It was found that variation in wind generation
create variation in grid. But by using the facts devices, we can
decrease the reactive power and make the system more stable
in heavy and light load conditions. The output of wind power
plant is depending upon the amount of wind which is not
constant at all time in day. Due to this by using the second
generation facts devices we can reduce the losses. In all facts
devices, the interline power flow controller give better result as
compare to the other controller.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are grateful to their respective institutes and
their colleagues for their support.
REFERENCES
[1] Laslzo Gyugi, Kalyan K.Sen, Colin D.Schauder (July1999)
“The interline power flow controller concept: A new approach to
power flow management in transmission system”. IEEE Transactions
on Power Delivery, Vol. 14, No. 3.
[2] Atri Rai (July2013), “Enhancement of voltage stability and
reactive power control of multimachine power system using fact
devices”, International journal of engineering and innovation
technology Volume 3, Issue 1.
[3] Amir khayaei (7 June 2011) “Analysis of interline power flow
controller (IPFC) location in power transmission system”. Research
Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 3(7): 633-
639.
[4] A. P.Usha Rani, B. S.Rama Reddy (3 June 2007) “Modeling and
digital simulation of interline power flow controller system”.
International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol.
No.2. 3.
[5] D.Lakshman Kumar, K.Ram Charan (August 2012) “Master
slave control of interline power flow controller using PSO
technique”. International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA), vol.no.2.
[6] Yaosuo Xue, Chenxi Lin, Maria Tamayo (2011) “Voltage
stability and sensitivity analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic
system”, 978-1-4577-1002-5/11/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE.
[7] J.Muruganandham, (2012) “performance analysis of interline
power flow controller for practical power system”. 2012 IEEE
Students Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science.
[8] S Teerathana,A.yokonama(2004) “An optimal power flow
control method of power system using the interline power flow
controller(IPFC)”, 0-7803-8560-8/04/$20.00©2004IEEE.
[9] Antonio C.Borre,Abnery Ortiz,Edson H.Wantable,
“synchronous generator power oscillations damped by using the TCSC
or SSSC working as a variable reluctance”.
[10] Prity bisen, Amit shrivastava (2013) “comparison between svc
and statcom facts devices for power system stability enhancement”,
International Journal on Emerging Technologies 4(2): 101-109(2013).
[11] Ramnarayan Patel, T. S. Bhatti and D. P. Kothari, “Mat lab
/simulink based transient stability analysis of multimachine power
system”, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education
39/4.
[12] Swoop Kumar.Nallagalva, Mukesh Kumar Kirar, and
Dr.Ganga Agnihotri (July 2012), “Transient stability analysis of the
IEEE 9-bus electric power system”, International Journal of Scientific
Engineering and Technology Volume No.1, Issue No.3, pg: 161-166.
[13] Jogendra Singh Thong am, Mohamed Ouhrouche, “MPPT
control methods in wind energy conversion system”, Electric
Machines Identification and Control Laboratory, Department of
Applied Sciences.
[14] Eftichios Koutroulis, Kostas Kalaitzakis (APRIL 2006),
“Design of maximum power point tracking system for wind energy
conversion applications”, IEEE transaction on industrial electronics,
vol 53 no 2.
[15] Hae Gwang Jeong,Ro Hak Seung,Kyo Baum Lee (2012), “An
improved maximum power point tracking method for wind power “
1339-1354; doi:10.3390/en5051339.
[16] Yun-Su Kim , Il-Yop Chung , Seung-Il Moon, (2013), “ An
analysis of variable speed wind turbine power control methods with
fluctuating wind speed”, Energies 6, 3323-3338;
doi:10.3390/en6073323.