results from the california energy efficiency potential study – existing residential and...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Results from the CaliforniaEnergy Efficiency Potential Study –
Existing Residential and Commercial
Jean Shelton
July 27, 2006
San Francisco, California
![Page 2: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Presentation Overview
• Overview study goals• Overview of the types of potential• California energy savings potential
– Review of total savings potential from all sectors and utilities.
• Existing residential and commercial analysis– Overview of measures covered– Results– Utility specific results
• Conclusions
![Page 3: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Study Goals
• Collect Input data– Measures saturations and technology density: RASS and CEUS– Cost and impacts from DEER– Load data from CEUS and Site Pro
• Estimate gas and electric energy efficiency potential for existing residential and commercial buildings– Technical– Economic– Market or achievable
• Estimate potential statewide, utility, climate zone, segment and measure specific.
• Study report incorporates the results from two additional studies: Existing industrial (KEMA) and new construction (Itron, RLW, AEC)
![Page 4: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Types of Potential
• Technical potential: Highest efficiency feasible and applicable option. – Instantaneous potential: retrofit and conversions.– Phased-in potential: replace-on-burn out.
• Economic potential: Highest efficiency feasible and applicable option that is cost effective.– Instantaneous and phased-in potential.
• Market potential: Savings impacts that can be expected to occur with a given level of utility program activity.– Screens for feasibility, applicability, awareness, and willingness.– Calibrate to 2004 actual program accomplishments– Scenarios: 2004 incentives, full incentives, average incentives
![Page 5: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
California Statewide Potential ResultsAll Sectors
![Page 6: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Statewide Gross Electric Energy Potential: All Sectors
63,814
53,150
23,974
20,065
16,226
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Technical Economic Full Average Current
GW
H
![Page 7: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Statewide Gross Electric Demand Potential: All Sectors
15,483
11,151
4,887
3,772
2,594
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
Technical Economic Full Average Current
MW
![Page 8: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Statewide Gross Gas Potential: All Sectors
2,336
1,453
622
440
247
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Technical Economic Full Average Current
Mill
ions
of T
herm
s
.
![Page 9: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Distribution of Current Market Energy Potential
Existing Residential53%
Existing Commercial18%
Existing Industrial14%
Ind. New Construction1%
Res. New Construction1%
Emerging Tech7%
Com. New Construction6%
![Page 10: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Distribution of Current Market Demand Potential
Existing Commercial18%
Existing Industrial11%
Res. New Construction5%
Com. New Construction8%
Ind. New Construction2%
Emerging Tech11%
Existing Residential45%
![Page 11: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Distribution of Gas Potential
Existing Residential36%
Existing Commercial11%
Existing Industrial27%
Res. New Construction7%
Com. New Construction4%
Emerging Tech15%
![Page 12: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
California Statewide Potential Existing Residential
![Page 13: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
• Fifty-one electric and 14 gas high efficiency measures– HVAC
• Central A/C and HP, duct and insulation measures, room A/C, evaporative coolers, and high-efficiency furnaces
– Lighting• CFLs, hard-wired fixtures, torchieres, etc.
– Water Heaters • DHW, dishwashers, clothes washers, pipe wrap, boiler controllers, etc.
– Pool Pumps– Refrigerators & Recycling
• Includes measures in IOU 2004 programs and other measures the IOUs are interested in potentially including.
Measures Included in the Existing Residential Analysis
![Page 14: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Existing Residential Gross Electric Potential vs. Total Usage
21,873
5,365
2,729 2,233 1,8271,161
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
EnergyDemand
TechnicalPotential
EconomicPotential
FullIncremental
Cost
Average Current
MW
84,731
25,807
19,226
11,758 10,309 8,445
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
Energy Usage TechnicalPotential
EconomicPotential
FullIncremental
Cost
Average Current
GW
h
![Page 15: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Existing Residential Gross Market Energy Potential 2004-2016
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
GW
h
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 16: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Existing Residential Gross Market Demand Potential 2004-2016
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
MW
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 17: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Existing Residential Gross Energy Market Potential by End Use
4,990
12,330
7,880
606
1,215
12,056
5,654
302
1,821
5,774
4,019
143
1,325
5,358
3,512
114512
5,008
2,855
71
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 18: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Existing Residential Gross Demand Market Potential by End Use
3,096
1,1691,039
62
805
1,143
757
24
1,156
548 512
17
856
509 449
13
312
476366
8
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
MW
Technical Economic Full Averrage Current
![Page 19: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Discussion of Existing Residential Electric End Use Potential
• Nearly all lighting measures are cost-effective• All miscellaneous measures other than high-
efficiency refrigerators and dryers are cost-effective
• All water heater measures other than high efficiency clothes washers, dishwashers, and instantaneous water heaters are cost-effective
• Few HVAC measures are cost-effective – HVAC diagnostics, 13 SEER HP, wall insulation, and
windows– Changes in federal standards
![Page 20: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Existing Residential Energy Usage and Economic and Technical Potential by Utility
40,428
35,837
8,466
11,96911,040
2,798
8,9968,100
2,130
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
PG&E SCE SDG&E
GW
h
Energy Usage Technical Potential Economic Potential
![Page 21: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
PG&E Gross Existing Residential Energy Potential
2,128
5,825
3,663
352465
5,728
2,629
174
580
2,314
1,573
88
403
2,140
1,247
72180
1,991
877
53
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 22: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
PG&E Gross Existing Residential Demand Potential
1,516
552
475
36
408
543
346
14
451
220 197
11
321
203156
9
141189
110
6
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
MW
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 23: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
SCE Gross Existing Residential Electric Potential
2,419
5,072
3,350
199
677
4,902
2,422
99
1,071
2,642
1,990
37
798
2,447
1,867
25
285
2,286
1,654
60
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 24: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
SCE Gross Existing Residential Demand Potential
1,269
481447
20
345
465
328
8
559
251 256
4
427
232 240
3
131
217 213
00
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
MW
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 25: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
SDG&E Gross Existing Residential Energy Potential
443
867
5572
602
2946
730
324
12
125
772
399
16
170
819
456
18
1,433 1,426
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
GW
h
Technical Economic Current Average Full Incremental Cost
![Page 26: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
SDG&E Gross Existing Residential Demand Potential
312
136
117
5
52
135
82
2
40
69
42
1
108
73
52
2
145
78
59
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
HVAC Lights Msc WHeat
MW
Technical Economic Current Average Full Incremental Cost
![Page 27: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Discussion of Existing Residential Electric Scenarios
• Lighting measures have a short payback period – Little impact from increasing rebates.
• HVAC measures have a longer payback period – More sensitive to increasing rebates– Increasing rebates quickly leads to the adoption of non-
economic measures.
• Miscellaneous measures – Refrigerator and freezer recycling have a large gross energy
potential but a low net to gross ratio.
![Page 28: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Existing Residential Costs and Benefits
Item Current Average Full
Gross Program Costs
$101,593,868 $125,481,099 $149,350,098
Net Measure Costs
$1,871,876,432 $3,128,023,800 $4,473,299,926
Gross Incentives
$1,471,506,688 $2,704,205,291 $5,239,323,202
Net Avoided Cost Benefit
$3,726,813,980 $4,891,134,045 $5,760,643,295
Program TRC 1.89 1.5 1.25
![Page 29: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Existing Residential Gross Gas Potential vs. Total Usage
5,574
972
303 231 178 880
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Gas Forecast Technical Economic Full IncrementalCost
Average Current
Mill
ion
s o
f T
herm
s
.
![Page 30: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Existing Residential Gross Market Gas Potential 2004-2016
0
50
100
150
200
250
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Mill
ions
of
Ther
ms
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 31: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Existing Residential Gas Market Scenario by End Use
546
420
6
77
225
0
88
138
5
70
106
2
31
56
00
100
200
300
400
500
600
HVAC Water Heating Dryers
Mill
ion
s o
f T
her
ms
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 32: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Discussion of Residential Gas End Use Potential
• Very few gas measures are cost-effective• Wall insulation is cost-effective in some housing
types and climate zones.• Low cost water heating measures are cost-
effective– Faucet aerators, showerheads, boiler controllers, and
water heater wrap
• Increasing HVAC incentive levels will encourage the adoption of measures that are not economical.
![Page 33: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Existing Residential Gas Usage and Gross Technical and Economic Potential by Utility
2,404
2,767
403376
521
76153 116
33
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
PG&E SCG SDG&E
Mill
ion
s o
f T
herm
s .
Gas Forecast Technical Economic
![Page 34: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
PG&E Existing Residential Gross Gas Potential by End Use
217
1
157
75
0
78
45
1
55
36
1
47
19
0
28
0
50
100
150
200
250
HVAC Dryers WHeat
Mill
ion
Th
erm
s
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 35: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
SCG Existing Residential Gross Gas Potential by End Use
303.3
4.3
213.0
0.0 0.0
116.4
11.40.0
19.329.8
0.8
45.537.6
3.7
66.2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
HVAC Dryers Wheat
Mill
ion
Ther
ms
.
Technical Economic Current Average Full
![Page 36: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
SDG&E Existing Residential Gross Gas Potential by End Use
25.4
0.8
49.4
2.60.0
30.6
1.40.0
8.4
4.5
0.3
13.9
5.5
0.6
16.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
HVAC Dryers Wheat
Mill
ion
Th
erm
s .
Technical Economic Current Average Full Incremental Cost
![Page 37: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Existing Residential Cost and Benefits Gas
Item Current Average Full
Gross Program Costs $27,262,306 $55,122,158 $69,446,476
Net Measure Costs $1,564,800,255 $4,105,185,958 $4,990,005,002
Gross Incentives $785,192,150 $3,289,974,300 $6,033,430,652
Net Avoided Cost Benefit
$264,879,468 $514,353,572 $647,561,596
Program TRC 0.17 0.12 0.13
![Page 38: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Potential in Existing Commercial Buildings
![Page 39: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
• 82 commercial measures– HVAC
• Chillers, packaged A/C, tune-ups, VSDs, window film, thermostat controls, and high efficiency boilers
– Lighting• CFLs, HIDs, occupancy sensors, T8/T5s, exit signs, etc.
– Refrigeration • Glass doors, night covers, compressors, etc.
– Miscellaneous• Vending machine controls, cooking, copy machine, gas water heater
• Includes measures in the IOU 2004 programs and measures that the IOUs are interested in potentially including
Measures Included in the Commercial Analysis
![Page 40: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Existing Commercial Usage with Economic and Technical Energy Potential
27,287
3,0961,996
982 787 4610
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Total Use Technical Economic FullIncremental
Average Current
MW
93,771
13,93211,290
4,720 4,104 3,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
Total Use Technical Economic FullIncremental
Average CurrentG
Wh
![Page 41: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Existing Commercial Gross Market Potential by Scenario 2004-2016
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
GW
h
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 42: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Existing Commercial Gross Demand Potential by Scenario 2004-2016
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
MW
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 43: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Existing Commercial Gross Energy End-Use Potential
6,437
3,993
394
5,738
2,115
373570
51
550
45
655 528
37
3,1083,064
1,676
2,424
1,315
2,194
1,780
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Lighting HVAC Refrigeration Miscellaneous
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Incremental Average Current
![Page 44: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Existing Commercial Gross Demand End-Use Potential
973
1,623
56
866
641
53807
776
108 745
443437
524
371367336
273
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Lighting HVAC Refrigeration Miscellaneous
MW
Technical Economic Full Incremental Average Current
![Page 45: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Discussion of Commercial Electric End Use Potential
• Nearly all lighting, miscellaneous, and refrigeration measures are cost-effective in all climate zones and building segments.
• Many HVAC measures are cost-effective in selected climate zones and building segments.– Energy savings differ by building segment and climate
zone.– Only cool roofs are never cost-effective
![Page 46: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Existing Commercial Electricity Usage and Gross Technical and Economic Potential by Utility
41,139 42,209
10,423
5,5536,938
1,442
4,583 5,557
1,151
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
PG&E SCE SDG&E
GW
h
Total Use Technical Economic
![Page 47: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Existing Commercial Gross Demand Usage and Economic and Technical Potential by Utility
8,082
8,782
2,126
1,2751,535
286798 1,002
1960
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
PG&E SCE SDG&E
MW
Total Use Technical Economic
![Page 48: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
PG&E Existing Commercial Gross Energy Potential by End Use
2,632
1,411
165 152
850
694
246
28
743
552
236
26
574
287225
22
1,345
2,376
1,330
724
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 49: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
PG&E Existing Commercial Gross Demand Potential by End Use
390
665
23 21
128
254
35
4
112
174
344
86
4932
3
197
232
195
351
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
MW
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 50: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
SCE Existing Commercial Gross Energy Potential by End Use
3,122
2,146
186
2,754
1,164
180
1,341
765
256
20
1,233
577
247
18
1,022
244 239
14
1,484 1,459
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 51: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
SCE Existing Commercial Gross Demand Potential by End Use
479
820
26
422
349
26
208 221
353
192156
342
159
37 332
209 205
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
MW
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 52: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
SDG&E Existing Commercial Gross Energy Potential by End Use
682
437
279
43
608
226
275
42
233218
69
2
218185
66
2
184
124
64
10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
GW
h
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 53: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
SDG&E Existing Commercial Gross Demand Potential by End Use
104
138
38
6
93
60
37
6
35
49
9
0
3338
9
0
2822
9
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Lights HVAC REFG Miscellaneous
MW
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 54: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Commercial Costs and Benefits - Electric
Item Current Average Full
Gross Program Costs $29,069,379 $44,335,358 $54,985,758
Net Measure Costs $773,740,351 $1,656,789,933 $2,150,178,594
Gross Incentives $231,615,979 $1,020,263,075 $2,253,065,121
Net Avoided Cost Benefit
$2,031,445,156 $2,780,609,268 $3,171,958,939
Program TRC 2.53 1.63 1.44
![Page 55: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Existing Commercial Usage and Gross Gas Potential by Scenario
2,070
10938 56 44 27
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Total Usage Technical Economic Full Incremental Average Current
Mil
lio
ns
of
Th
erm
s
![Page 56: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Existing Commercial Gross Gas Market Potential 2004-2016
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Mill
ion
s o
f T
her
ms
Full - 2004 Measures Average - 2004 Measures Current
![Page 57: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Existing Commercial Gross Gas End-Use Potential
51.4
57.6
26.6
11.8
28.2 27.6
23.8
19.7
16.0
10.7
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
HVAC Miscellaneous
Mil
lio
n T
her
ms
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 58: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Discussion of Commercial Gas End Use Potential
• Gas water heating measures are cost-effective– Water heaters and circulating pump time clocks.
• No gas cooking measures are cost-effective.• Two gas HVAC measures are cost-effective and
two gas HVAC measures are not cost-effective.– Boiler pipe insulation and thermostats are cost-
effective.– High efficiency boilers and boiler tune-ups are not
cost-effective.
![Page 59: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Existing Commercial Usage and Gross Potential by Utility
778
1,145
147
3267
98 28 2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
PG&E SCG SDG&E
Mill
ions
of T
herm
s
Total Use Technical Economic
![Page 60: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
PG&E Existing Commercial Gross Gas Potential by End Use
15
17
8
4
6
23
1
44
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
HVAC Miscellaneous
Mill
ion
Th
erm
s
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 61: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
SCG Existing Commercial Gross Gas Potential by End Use
3335
21
7
1821
16 16
13
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
HVAC Miscellaneous
Mill
ions
of
Th
erm
s
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 62: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
SDG&E Existing Commercial Gross Gas Potential by End Use
3.3
6.0
1.1 1.2
1.8
2.5
1.5 1.5
0.0
0.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HVAC Miscellaneous
Mill
ion
s o
f T
her
ms
Technical Economic Full Average Current
![Page 63: Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649ea15503460f94ba48e9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
Existing Commercial Gas Costs and Benefits
Item Current Average Full
Gross Program Costs $21,876,929 $31,667,968 $38,766,114
Net Measure Costs $89,426,180 $196,284,482 $276,641,547
Gross Incentives $19,461,300 $110,101,772 $262,951,827
Net Avoided Cost Benefit $84,223,141 $141,877,389 $178,556,321
Program TRC 0.76 0.62 0.57