results-based public management - fao

1Program and Project design

Results-based public management

tools for the design and implementation of public rural

development programs with a project cycle approach

Implementation and

Monitoring

DiagnosisEvaluation

DesignmodULe 2

Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach

2

iProgram and Project design

Food and agRicultuRe oRganiz ation oF the united nations

S a n t i a g o , 2 0 1 4

Implementation and

Monitoring

DiagnosisEvaluation

Results-based public management

tools for the design and implementation of public rural

development programs with a project cycle approach

DesignmodULe 2


ii

the designations employed and the presentation of material in this information

product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the

food and agriculture organization of the United nations (fao) concerning the legal

or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or

concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. the mention of specific

companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented,

does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by fao in preference

to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

the views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not

necessarily reflect the views or policies of fao.

isbn 978-92-5-108467-0 (print)

e-isbn 978-92-5-108468-7 (Pdf)

© fao, 2014

fao encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information

product. except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and

printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial

products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of fao as the source

and copyright holder is given and that fao’s endorsement of users’ views, products or

services is not implied in any way.

all requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial

use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to

[email protected].

fao information products are available on the fao website (www.fao.org/publications)

and can be purchased through [email protected].

iiiProgram and Project design

aknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vii

Presentation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ix

introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xi

I. Program and project design -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1

C h a p t e r 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

Methodology for program and project design ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

1.1 objectives analysis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4

1.2 alternatives analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7

1.3 Performance indicators --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11

1.4 means of verification ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14

1.5 risks and assumptions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17

1.6 counterfactual data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20

II. Case Study -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23

C h a p t e r 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24

Example of program design ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24

2.1 analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources

in the rural and fishing sector ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24

2.2 development of indicators of the budgetary programs in mexico ----------------------------------------- 40

2.3 baseline study of sagarPa Programs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 43

III. Tools -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------51

Questionnaire for the baseline of the rural and fishing sector programs --------------------------------------------52

contents

iii


iv

IV. Annexes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 103

Annex 1 sampling framework for the baseline study of the 2008 sagarPa Programs ------------------------104

Annex 2 sample size by stratum by state -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 105

Annex 3 sample size by state for non-stratified listed population ---------------------------------------------------106

Annex 4 sample size by state for non-listed population--------------------------------------------------------------- 107

f I g u R E S

Figure 1. Project life cycle: design -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

Figure 2. objectives tree -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4

Figure 3. vertical logic of a program or project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5

Figure 4. identification of alternatives (1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7

Figure 5. identification of alternatives (2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8

Figure 6. from the analysis of alternatives to the logical framework ---------------------------------------------------10

Figure 7. Logical framework: indicators -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13

Figure 8. horizontal logic of the program or project ----------------------------------------------------------------------15

Figure 9. Logical framework: means of verification -----------------------------------------------------------------------16

Figure 10. relationship between risks/assumptions and objectives-----------------------------------------------------17

Figure 11. flow chart for the verification of risks and assumptions -----------------------------------------------------18

Figure 12. Logical framework: risks/assumptions -------------------------------------------------------------------------19

Figure 13. Problem tree of the degradation of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector ----------------- 24

Figure 14. objectives tree for the design of a program on sustainable use of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector of mexico ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25

Figure 15. Purpose and outputs in the rural and fishing sector -------------------------------------------------------- 26

Figure 16. general activities for each output ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 27

Figure 17. alternatives tree----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37

iv

vProgram and Project design

TA b l E S

TAble 1. evaluation of alternatives matrix ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9

TAble 2. weighting for the selection of indicators ------------------------------------------------------------------------12

TAble 3. means of verification by indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------14

TAble 4. identification of risks and assumptions -------------------------------------------------------------------------18

TAble 5. Performance indicator reference sheet of the imr of sagarPa’s Program to support investment in equipment and infrastructure -------------------------------------------------------------------41

TAble 6. Potential population and target population -------------------------------------------------------------------- 43

TAble 7. strata in which the target population was classified --------------------------------------------------------- 44

TAble 8. Questionnaire structure for conducting the baseline study of the sagarPa Programs -------------- 48

v


vivi

A C R o n y M S

fAo food and agriculture organization

fW fall-winter

IMR indicators matrix for results

lfM Logical framework method

REu rural economic Unit

RSS random stratified sampling

SAgARPA ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food

SRS simple random sampling

SS spring–summer

SWoT strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

viiProgram and Project design

acknowledgements

for more than ten years, the United nations food and agriculture organization (fao), through ongoing rural policy

evaluation and analysis projects, has provided technical assistance to the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural

development, fishing and food (sagarPa) of mexico, in the area of evaluation of programs promoting agriculture,

fishing and aquaculture production, and rural development. in the framework of this cooperation, methodological

tools have been developed jointly for the management of the different phases of a program: sector diagnosis, design,

implementation and evaluation. this document brings together the experiences obtained from the projects so that

they can be reproduced or referenced by actors involved in the management of programs or projects with similar

characteristics.

in the development of the projects the contributions of the following sagarPa officers stands out: arturo enciso

serrano, ernesto ezequiel abraham tarrab, horacio santoyo, josé de jesús romo santos, josé correa, juan carlos

vargas moreno, Lucía rosas ortíz, miguel Ángel López arreguín, omar anaya mandujano, alan Kristian hernández,

Pablo hernández alarcón, Patricia valtierra carrillo, claudia gabriela valadez romero, roberto cedeño, rogelio

carmona León, eduardo benitez Paulín, josé merced tulais López and silvia Urbina hinojosa.

a special mention is made of veronica gutierrez macías, jaime clemente hernandez and renato olvera nevarez (in

memoriam).

alfredo gonzalez cambero, who directed the projects from 2007 to 2012, and salomón salcedo baca, senior Policy

officer of the regional office for Latin america and the caribbean of the fao and at the time technical leader of the

projects, were the lead authors of this publication. ana harumi hayashida carrillo and ina salas casasola, both fao

consultants, participated in its drafting. members of the projects collaborated in the systematization of each of the four

modules of this compendium of tools, contributing their knowledge and experiences in each of the phases of a project.

Particular recognition is given to isabel madrid Pérez, ruth mendoza ortinez, mariana ortega ramirez and alejandro

davila topete who contributed to the construction of the alternatives tree for the sustainability of natural resources.

finally, the operational leadership of the projects is acknowledged to the representation office of fao in mexico.

vii


viii

ixProgram and Project design

Presentation

since the marrakech round table in 2004, the international community has supported five specific commitments related

to improving the effectiveness of development assistance1, synthesized in the concept of “managing for development

results”. this implies taking into account from the beginning of any initiative, project or program the expected outcomes

and how to achieve them. furthermore, the implementation, progress monitoring, and subsequent evaluation should

consider the expected outcomes that were established at the beginning of the process.

in this regard, there is a great challenge for developing countries to adopt a new vision. this means breaking with old

customs and patterns in the manner of handling the project cycle, changing from a focus on addressing demand to a

planning process for achieving specific outcomes, established from the beginning. while there is no single approach,

since each country, each sector and each project presents particular situations, there are experiences that can be

systematized and shared.

the preparation of a set of tools for results-based management responds to the need to break with inertial operating

schemes of public development programs in the majority of countries, which do not contemplate efficiency and efficacy

in achieving results. the absence of such an approach implies that substantial resources are spent without a timeframe

for resolving the problems that the public interventions are intended for.

this document brings together the experiences obtained from the evaluation and analysis of rural Policies Project

undertaken by the United nations food and agriculture organization (fao) and the mexican ministry of agriculture,

Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa) during the implementation of the “results-based

management” focus in its different Programs. in this respect, on four occasions the national council for the evaluation

of social development Policy of mexico has granted recognition to sagarPa for its good practices in the development,

execution and evaluation of public policy in the field since 2007, taking an important step toward improving its programs

and orienting them toward performance and impact in the rural sector.

the document “results-based public management: tools for the design and implementation of public rural development

programs with a project cycle approach” includes the four phases of the life cycle of a project or program. the first

module includes the methodological tools for conducting a sector diagnosis, which constitutes the first step that justifies

the intervention by making it possible to identify a problem, dimension it, identify and quantify the population or area

facing the problem, and stratify such population.

the second module presents the procedure and methodological tools for the design of a program or project which will be

synthesized in the Logical framework. in this module the methodology is shown for conducting the objectives analysis

and the alternatives analysis, constructing performance indicators, identifying the means of verification, identifying risk

and assumptions, and collecting counterfactual data for a baseline of the performance indicators of the program or

project.

1 the principles of results-based management agreed on during the second round table on managing for development results in 2004, are: 1) focus the dialog on results in all the phases of the development process; 2) align programming, monitoring and evaluation with results; 3) keep measurement and reporting simple; 4) manage for, not by, results; and 5) use results information for learning and decision-making.

ix


x

the third module provides the methodology for the implementation of a program or project which, under the results

approach, should include a monitoring and evaluation system consistent with its design, budgeting, and regulation, as

well as design and processes evaluations in the first year of implementation of the program or project.

the fourth module consists of the methodology for evaluating the outcomes obtained by the program or project as a

result of its implementation through the design of the results and impact evaluation of a program or project.

each module is structured with a chapter on theory and a chapter on experience referring to the mentioned Project, and

complemented with the systematization of the methodological tools for a better understanding of the sections

Salomón Salcedo baca Alfredo gonzález Cambero

senior Policy officer Project director (2007-2012)

x

xiProgram and Project design

xi

introduction

the objectives or expected outcomes of public policy are established at the time of designing the programs or projects

that will implement the public policy. for its part, the design of public development programs begins with the proper

identification of development problems.

however, it is common to find that development programs or projects do not have a documented design. in the

majority of cases, the design is limited to the narrative summary and specific indicators in the matrixes of the logical

framework of such programs or projects. the essence of the design of a program or project, therefore, depends on the

interpretation each officer makes of such narrative summary.

the primary areas of opportunity regarding the design of programs or projects lie in the unclear definition of, or

sometimes complete failure to identify, the problem to be addressed, and in the establishing of objectives as activities,

rather than desired or achieved situations. another area of opportunity is defining the target population of a program

or project. while many programs or projects establish the target population to which they are directed, the inadequate

definition of such target population often results in a universal application of the program, which may even include those

who do not have the problem that the program or project addresses.

this module’s integrated tool set provides the technical elements necessary for the design of programs or projects,

and also includes the syntax used in establishing objectives so that they reflect achieved situations and not actions, as

commonly occurs.

to achieve the above, the integrated tool set includes the logical framework methodology so that orderly steps are

followed in the design of a program or project, ensuring internal logic with regard to its goal and purpose, as well as the

outputs and activities to achieve it.

through the stakeholders analysis a panorama is offered of all the persons, groups, organizations, institutions, state

governments, municipal governments, etc. that are involved in the actions of the program, as well as the institutional

arrangement that is required for the execution of the program or project.

for its part, through the problems analysis the development problem that underlies the design of a program or project

is identified and defined, as well as the causes and effects of such problem.

through the objectives analysis the future situation that it is desired to reach with the execution of a program or project

is established, maintaining the correspondence with the identified problem and its causes, so that the situation that

would exist after the problem is resolved is described.

the alternatives analysis allows for the design of a more succinct program or project. this step makes it possible to

identify the alternative strategies that, if executed, would contribute to changing the current situation into a desired

situation. the alternatives analysis also includes the analysis of their feasibility so that the appropriate alternatives are

chosen in function of the objectives established by the program or project.


xii

as part of this module dedicated to the design of programs and projects, the methodology is shown for completing,

after the analysis of objectives and alternatives, the logical framework matrix of a program, which includes the narrative

summary, performance indicators, means of verification, and risks and assumptions.

finally, a methodological section is presented for the development of counterfactual information, which is useful for

monitoring and evaluating the performance of a program or project. this component of the integrated tool set includes

the procedure for developing a baseline.

xii

xiiiProgram and Project design

iX


xivX


Program and project design

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

I


2

2.Design

1.Diagnosis

4.Evaluation

3.Implementation and Monitoring

fIguRE 1. Project Life cycLe: DESIgn

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

chapter 1Methodology for program and project design

this document contains the methodological tools for the design of a program or project, a stage that is carried out once the problems affecting the sector under study and the potential population are identified and dimensioned. the design of a project or program constitutes the second phase of the project cycle (figure 1), and includes the elements that compose a project and enable it to achieve results. the steps of the design stage are:

• analysis of objectives

• analysis of alternatives

• development of performance indicators

• identification of the means of verification

• identification of risks and assumptions

• counterfactual data collection.


this chapter is divided into six sections, each of which offers a methodological guide to facilitate the development of each of the design steps. the first section consists of showing the methodological procedures for drafting the objectives, which reflect the desired situation sought through an intervention; this section is based on the Logical framework method (Lfm) for the construction of objectives trees. the second section shows the methodological steps for analyzing the various alternatives that exist for meeting the objectives and presents the elements that provide a basis for the selection of those that are most viable. the third section analyzes the methodological aspects for developing the performance indicators that make it possible to evaluate both results and implementation of the program or project. the fourth section offers criteria for identifying the means of verification or sources of information for obtaining the data used to measure the progress of the indicators and whether or not the objectives of the program or project are being achieved. the fifth section covers the methodology for identifying the risks that could affect the implementation of the program or project, which are expressed as assumptions that must be considered since they condition the development of activities and outputs, as well as the achievement of the Purpose and goal of the program or project. the sixth section contains the set of tools for conducting a baseline study for a program or project which would provide counterfactual data for future monitoring and evaluation of a program or project.


4

1.1 objectives analysis

the analysis of objectives makes it possible to portray the future situation to be reached once the problems have been solved through an intervention. for that purpose, the development of objectives consists of converting the negative states identified in the problem analysis into desired situations according to feasibility principles; in other words, that the objectives can be achieved using the resources and time available for the development of the program or project. the results of this analysis are summarized in an objectives tree as presented in figure 2.

fIguRE 2. objectives tree

Central objective (Purpose)

Goal

Means


How the objectives tree is prepared

in the context of a program or project there are four types of objectives, which are classified according to their hierarchical order:

1. goal the sector’s development objective to which the project is intended to contribute. the goal’s full completion is beyond the scope of the project or program, but the combination of the latter with other programs or projects will lead to its achievement.

2. Purpose it is the specific objective of the program or project and it is fulfilled when the implementation of the intervention is completed.

3. outputs they are the result of the activities of the program or project, and they take the form of goods and services that are provided to achieve the Purpose of the program or project.

4. Activitiesthey are the tasks or actions that the implementer must carry out in order to produce each of the outputs of a program or project. the activities can be disaggregated in turn into sub-activities or inputs.

there must be a causal link between the different levels of objectives, which is known as the vertical logic. in this regard, if the program or project is well designed the following should hold:

a) the activities specified for each output are those necessary and sufficient to produce the output,

b) the outputs are those necessary and sufficient to achieve the Purpose of the project or program, and

c) the achievement of the Purpose must contribute significantly to the goal.

fIguRE 3. verticaL Logic of a Program or Project

goal

Purpose

output 1

activity 1.1

activity 1.2

activity 1.3

output 2

activity 2.1

activity 2.2

activity 2.3

output 3

activity 3.1

activity 3.2

activity 3.3

output 4

activity 4.1

activity 4.2

activity 4.3


6

in order to determine each of these objectives, an objectives analysis is conducted, which consists of substituting the current situations (negative) for the desired situations. for example:

RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ThE DEVEloPMEnT of ThE objECTIVES TREE

natural resources used sustainably

degraded natural resources

Problem objective

1. objectives should be drafted expressing an achieved situation. For example: “Fishers trained in environmentally friendly fishing techniques”.

2. do not include in the same statement the means and the end. For example: “Farmers use new cultivation techniques to increase their productivity.” in this case the end is “to increase productivity”, and the means is the “use of new cultivation techniques”.

3. avoid establishing desired situations that are unlikely to be achieved considering that there are limits in resources and time.

4. the vertical relationship between “means and end” should be verified. the guiding question is “how?”.

f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :

bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.

Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.

heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.

IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. boletín 15. santiago de chile.

IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.

Schmeer, K. (1999). Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis. bethesda, md.


a B c

1.2 alternatives analysis

from the objectives analysis a vision is obtained of all the necessary and sufficient means to solve the identified problem. the objectives tree makes it possible to determine the necessary outputs that must be integrated into the intervention in order to contribute to solving the problem at hand. however, the alternatives to achieve it can be many and the team responsible for designing the program or project must choose the best among all the possible alternatives.

the alternatives analysis provides a systematic method for selecting the strategy on which each output of the program or project will be based. some of the criteria that may be considered are: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, economic viability, technical viability, institutional viability and environmental impact.

How the alternatives analysis is done

the first step is to identify the different options or group of actions that can lead to an output. these activities constitute the “alternatives”.

fIguRE 4. identification of aLternatives (1)

in addition, through this analysis the groups of alternatives that are complementary among themselves for achieving an output can be identified. such complementary groups can themselves be grouped into a new option. there are other groups of alternatives that are exclusionary, and cannot be considered in the same strategy. in this example groups a and c are exclusionary, but groups a and b are complementary, as are b and c. therefore, a new group called “d” can be created which is equal to set a+b, and a group “e” which is equal to set b+c.


8

d e

after identifying the various alternatives, the next step is to analyze them. the criteria for analyzing them vary according to the type of project and the context in which it is being carried out. some of these criteria are:

a. Relevance

this refers to the coherence that the alternative has with the policies of the implementing institution and with the priorities of the target population. the stakeholder analysis helps to clarify which alternative better meets the priorities of the potential population.

b. Efficacy

measures the degree to which the alternative solves or best contributes to solving the problem that was identified. this criterion has a great deal of weight, since it has to do with moving from the problem situation to the desired situation.

c. Efficiency

analyzes the balance between the benefit and the cost of each alternative from the economic point of view; in other words, what alternative generates the greatest benefit at the least cost. the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are useful for evaluating this criterion.

d. financial viability

examines the financial viability of each alternative. it centers on evaluating the availability of financial resources for funding the alternatives, as well as on the opportunity cost of the alternatives.

e. Technical viability

this is the technical capability (specialized human resources and adequate equipment) to implement the program or project.

fIguRE 5. identification of aLternatives (2)


f. Institutional viability

this refers to the institutional capacity which depends on various factors, such as the institutional setting in which the program or project will be implemented.

g. Environmental impact

analyzes the environmental impact and cost compared to the benefit of each alternative.

if the information is insufficient to make a comparison of the various alternatives, collecting data through feasibility studies for each alternative should be considered. the results of the feasibility studies contain quantitative information that facilitates the comparison of alternatives.

the last step is the selection of the alternative. one form of doing so is to rate each alternative on a scale from 1 to 5 and, based on the results, choose the most suitable one. the results of the alternatives analysis are entered into a comparative matrix where the global evaluation of each alternative can be seen and from which the most suitable one is selected (table 1).

alternativeevaluation criteria

globalrelevance efficacy efficiency financial

viabilitytechnical viability

institutional viability

environmental impact

a 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 28

b 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 25

c 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 21

d 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 31

e 5 4 2 1 2 2 3 19

RECoMMEnDATIonS foR PREPARIng ThE AlTERnATIVES AnAlySIS

as a result of the alternatives analysis it is possible to determine the goal, the Purpose, the outputs, and the activities of the project. the highest level becomes the goal, the central objective becomes the Purpose, the direct means of which become the outputs, and the underlying levels become the activities that are necessary and sufficient to achieve each output. this alignment makes up the first column (narrative summary) of the Logical framework (figure 6).

1. Verify the interdependence among the proposed actions and group those that are complementary. each of these groups may become an alternative itself.

2. separate the actions that are exclusionary in different alternatives.

3. Formulate the alternatives considering their level of impact on the solution of the problem.

TAblE 1. evaLUation of aLternatives matrix


10

narrative summary

indicatorsMeans of

VerificationRisks/

assumptions

goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

alTeRnaTIVes seleCTeD

these first two stages of analysis (objectives analysis and alternatives analysis) provide the elements for preparing the narrative summary of the Logical framework. the next columns which correspond to the indicators, means of verification, and risks and assumptions are explained in detail in the following sections. the Logical framework provides a visual structure that synthesizes, in a single table, the most important information of a program or project; furthermore, it provides a clear and simple expression of the internal logic of a particular program or project and of the results expected with its implementation.





IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. Boletín 15. santiago de chile.


The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management.

fIguRE 6. from the anaLysis of aLternatives to the LogicaL frameworK


1.3 Performance indicators

through the objectives and alternatives analysis the goal, the Purpose, the outputs, and the activities of a program or project are defined. the next step is to set performance indicators, with their respective targets, to make it possible to establish measurement parameters of what it is expected to achieve with a project or program in terms of coverage, results, and impact. the indicators establish relationships among variables and provide the basis for making comparisons between the actual situation and the counterfactual one, in addition to a continuous monitoring of the main elements of the intervention.

Performance indicators describe the targets of the project on each expected objectives level: goal, Purpose or output. in this way, the indicators make it possible to quantify the achievements, and they become the point of reference and the “navigation chart” for guiding the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the project. well formulated indicators ensure good management of the project and allow the implementers of the project or program to decide if additional outputs or course corrections will be necessary in order to achieve the Purpose laid out. in addition, upon finalizing the intervention it will be known if the expected impact and effects on the beneficiaries was achieved.

How the performance indicators are developed

the first step is to list all the indicators available and classify them according to achievement in the various objective levels of the Logical framework. according to the objective level that the indicators measure, they can be classified as:

a) Results indicators. measure the degree of fulfillment of the objectives (goal and Purpose) of a program or project, and

b) Process indicators. measure the progress in the processes of the program or project: the products and services delivered (outputs) and the actions to do so (activities).

an indicator should have certain attributes such as quantity, quality, time, and area benefited:

a) Quantity: it should establish in numerical terms the level of progress with respect to what was planned.

b) Quality: offers information about the attributes of the outputs.

c) Time: measures the achievements in a specific period of time.

d) Area: offers information on the coverage of the achievements.

the next step is to select the optimum indicators in order to reduce the number of indicators to a minimum. for that purpose, the criteria that the indicators should meet should be defined in order to facilitate their selection. some of these criteria may be:

a) Clarity: the indicator should be understandable.

b) Relevance: the indicator should provide information on the essence of the objective to be measured; that is to say, it should be defined based on what is important.

c) objectivity: the indicator should be tangible and observable.

d) Cost effectiveness: the indicator should be available at a reasonable cost.

e) Timeliness: the indicator should be available in a timely manner.

f) Independence: it should be possible to develop the indicator independently.


12

RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ThE DEVEloPMEnT of InDICAToRS

one useful tool is the weighting of the criteria defined for the selection of indicators as shown in table 2. each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 5 for each indicator proposed and, based on the results, the most suitable is chosen.

objetives IndicatorRating of criteria

Total pointsSelected

a b c d e f yes no

TAblE 2. weighting for the seLection of indicators

1. establish indicators according to the hierarchy of the objectives. the indicators for the highest level (goal) measure the long-term effects linked to lasting changes. therefore, these indicators can go beyond the scope of the program or project. For example: Rate of growth of agricultural gdP. For their part, the Purpose indicators measure the immediate changes generated by a program or project. For example: capitalization of farmers benefited by the program for the acquisition of capital goods. the indicators of outputs measure the delivery of specific goods or services within the structure of a project. For example: Farmers benefited by the acquisition of farm machinery.

2. each objective should have at least one indicator. there should not be a goal, a Purpose, outputs or activities that do not have their respective indicators, since each indicator measures the achievement of objectives in a particular time period, and that makes it possible to monitor and evaluate the performance of a program or project.

3. do not include too many indicators for the same objective. having an exaggerated number of indicators involves a high cost for the generation and monitoring of data, and therefore those for which monitoring does not imply a high cost should be prioritized and selected.

4. do not include indicators that cannot be verified. even if they are well designed, sometimes the indicators cannot be verified due to the fact that the means of verification does not exist or it is outdated.

5. the same indicator should not be repeated for different objective levels of the narrative summary.

6. Prepare performance indicator reference sheets that contain elements for their proper measurement such as: Method of calculation, frequency of measurement, unit of measurement, baseline, and target. in table 5 some examples are presented.

Source: Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme, Evaluation Office.


the indicators for each objective are placed in the second column of the logical framework as seen in figure 7.

fIguRE 7. LogicaL frameworK: InDICAToRS

in conclusion, the indicators are variables that make it possible to measure the level of achievement reached by the program or project in fulfillment of all its objective levels. in this regard, objectives and indicators are inseparable concepts, since the indicators exist in order to measure the fulfillment of the objectives. in the following section the methodology for identifying or establishing the means of verification is discussed.





IlPES-CEPAl (2003). Los indicadores de evaluación del desempeño: una herramienta para la gestión por resultados en América Latina. boletín 13. santiago de chile.



The World bank (1996). Performance monitor indicators: A handbook for managers. washington, dc.

The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management. washington, dc.

The World bank (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. washington, dc.

united nations Development Programme, Evaluation office (2002). Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. new york, ny.

narrative summary indicators Means of Verification Risks/assumptions

goal

Purpose

outputs

activities


14

1.4 Means of verification

the means of verification are the sources of information that are used to obtain the data needed to measure the progress of the indicators and, by that, corroborate whether or not the objectives of the project or program are being achieved.

What the means of verification should contain

as the basis, together with the indicators, for the evaluation of the program or project, the means of verification not only should contain the source of data, but also specify the method that will be used to collect them, the method of analysis, the periodicity or frequency of data collection and the agency or entity responsible for collecting them. in this regard, the means of verification should be very precise so that it is clear where, now and in the future, the data required for the calculation and monitoring of the performance indicators of the program or project can be found.

in the Logical framework only the data source is indicated. therefore, it is necessary to prepare an independent table for each indicator that contains the following elements:

a) Source. the data to verify the indicators may require a review of secondary sources (records in public offices) or primary sources (collection in the field and data analysis).

b) Method of collection. there is a wide variety of methods for collecting data, from interviews with key informants to surveys and direct observation in the field, focus groups, etc.

c) Method of analysis. the analysis of data can be done through a comparison of data, for example cost efficiency analysis, cause and effect analysis, etc.

d) frequency of collection. the frequency of data collection varies according to the hierarchical level of the objectives and the requirements of the stakeholders. for example, the activities are monitored with a frequency that may be weekly, monthly, quarterly or semi-annual in order to give timely follow up on the progress of the program or project. in contrast, the Purpose is monitored at specific times, such as an intermediate or final evaluation.

e) Agency or entity responsible for collecting the information. it should be clearly established what agency or entity is responsible for the collection and analysis of data.

the following table is a useful tool for defining the means of verification in an organized manner.

level narrative Summary Indicator

Means of verification

Source of information

Method of collection

Method of analysis

frequency of

collection

Responsible entity

goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

Source: Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme, Evaluation Office.

TAblE 3. means of verification by indicator


the relationship between objectives, indicators and means of verification leads to what is known as horizontal logic, which is met when:

a) the means of verification are those necessary and sufficient to obtain the data required for the calculation of indicators.

b) the indicators are adequately structured and make it possible to follow up on the project or program and evaluate the achievement of objectives.

RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ESTAblIShIng ThE MEAnS of VERIfICATIon

1. a good indicator should be verifiable. this means that there should be a means of verification to measure it. in addition, it should be ensured that the means of verification produces data with the frequency required.

2. the means of verification should be up to date sources with the required disaggregation.

3. data sources should be described precisely. it is not sufficient to mention, for example: “data of the Ministry of agriculture”. all the relevant information for identifying the data source should be included: name of the database, date of last update, period measured, unit responsible for the information, etc.

4. sometimes the information required does not have a source of data. in these cases, the generation of data should be added as an activity of the program or project and budgeted for, as for example: Baseline data to be collected by the program or project.

fIguRE 8. horizontaL Logic of the Program or Project


goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

Source: ILPES-CEPAL, 2005. Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas.


16

the means of verification are shown in the third column of the Logical framework (figure 9).

fIguRE 9. LogicaL frameworK: MEAnS of VERIfICATIon

narrative summary indicators Means of verification Risks/assumptions

goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

the means of verification should indicate where the data is to be obtained from in order to measure both process indicators (for outputs and activities) and results indicators (for goal and Purpose) for the monitoring or evaluation of a project or program. just as the objectives and the indicators are inseparable, the indicators and the means of verification form another relationship that cannot be separated. if an indicator does not have a means of verification, it is necessary to look for one.











goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

1.5 Risks and assumptions

the risks and assumptions are important events, conditions or decisions that are beyond the control of the implementer and which, nevertheless, are important in order for the project or program to advance at each objective level and achieve its goal. in other words, they are risks expressed in assumptions that must be met in order to advance to the next level in the hierarchy of objectives of the project.

in the Logical framework a diagonal logic is expressed; that is, if the activities are carried out and certain assumptions are met then the outputs are produced; if the outputs are produced and certain assumptions are met then the Purpose of the project is achieved; if the Purpose is produced and the further assumptions are met, then it contributes to the achievement of the goal (figure 10).

fIguRE 10. reLationshiP between risKs/assUmPtions and objectives


the risks confronted by a program or project are of diverse origins, which may be cultural or ethnic, political, economic, social, or natural. in some cases it may be possible to neutralize such risks, in which case the neutralization measures should be incorporated into the program or project strategy. in other cases they cannot be neutralized, and therefore they must always be kept in mind since they could eventually impede the achievement of objectives.

How to identify the risks and assumptions

there are some sources that make it possible to identify assumptions or risks. for example, through the analysis of stakeholders, information is obtained on the expectations and interests of the principal groups involved in a possible program or project. this analysis can produce information on cultural or ethnic assumptions. another source of information can be through the use of analysis tools such as swot (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). through the swot analysis, political, economic, and social assumptions of the context in which the program or project will take place can be identified.


18

finally, the assumptions related to nature refer mainly to climate conditions that affect the projects related to activities such as agriculture, fishing, etc. in these cases, it is useful to study the climate history of the area in which the program or project is located in order to calculate the probability of occurrence. the following table may be helpful for this task.

level narrative Summary

Risks/Assumptions

Cultural Political Economic Social Environmental

goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

TAblE 4. identification of risKs and assUmPtions


some examples of assumptions could be “agricultural prices remain stable”, “farmers do not oppose the introduction of technological changes”, “the economy maintains its rate of growth”, etc. however, for an assumption to be considered as such, it should have a reasonable likelihood of occurrence. an assumption with a high likelihood of occurrence and of high relevance is a factor that can stop the implementation of a program or project and in such a case the nature of activities, outputs, and Purpose should be analyzed at each level of the narrative summary of the program. to support this analysis the following flow chart can be used for the verification of risks and assumptions.

likelihood of redesign?

likelihood of occurrence?

Relevant?

External?

assumption

Includemedium

Continueyes

yesno

Do not include

noStop

yes

no

high

fIguRE 11. fLow chart for the verification of risKs and assUmPtions



even if all the activities planned are executed according to the program, it is possible that the expected results will not be achieved due to external factors (risks and assumptions). these factors are beyond the control of the program or project, but they are essential for carrying it out. therefore, they should be determined beforehand and monitored. in the Logical framework the risks and assumptions are outlined in the fourth column (figure12).

RECoMMEnDATIonS foR IDEnTIfyIng IMPoRTAnT RISKS AnD ASSuMPTIonS

1. the elements that should be considered in the determination of a risk or assumption are: a) it is beyond the control of the project, b) it is relevant, and c) it is likely to occur.

2. the assumptions should be drafted as a realized situation or one that is maintained. For example: “support to farmers is maintained as a priority of the new government”.

3. it should be possible to monitor the assumptions during the execution of the project. Monitoring the assumptions increases the probability of success of the program or project, and it also makes it possible to incorporate or remove new assumptions as the exogenous situation influencing the project changes.

fIguRE 12. LogicaL frameworK: RISKS/ASSuMPTIonS


goal

Purpose

outputs

activities

so far the methodology has been shown for the preparation of the Logical framework composed of four columns: narrative summary, indicators, means of verification, and relevant risks and assumptions. the information contained in the framework as a whole constitutes a managerial tool considered to be a “compass” of the project or program, which can be used in the phases of implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.

another product of the design phase is the baseline or base measurement of the performance indicators. through this process counterfactual data is obtained that makes it possible to monitor the progress of the program or project and evaluate its impact. the following section is dedicated to showing the methodology for carrying this out.


20

1.6 counterfactual data

the baseline study is the first measurement of all the indicators contemplated in the design of a program or project before its implementation. in this manner a point of departure is established for the intervention consisting of the value of the indicators at the time of initiating the planned actions, which is crucial since it is through the actions or activities of the program or project that the impacts of the intervention are to be achieved.

the following are among the principal characteristics of a baseline study:

a) generates quantitative data. Quantitative measurements are comparable in time and nature, although the possibility of using qualitative data as a point of departure is not discarded.

b) uses primary sources (ad-hoc). it is preferable that the baseline use principally primary sources, although the use of sources such as censuses, national surveys, regional diagnostics and prior studies, among other sources of information, should not be ruled out, provided they back up the required data given the fact that often development projects concern a specific scenario not contemplated by other researchers.

c) Measures specific indicators. specific indicators allow for the measurement of the results and impacts of the program as an effect of the interventions. this is of great importance in order to have elements on which to judge the effectiveness of the analyzed program or project.









How to conduct a baseline study

the methodology for preparing a baseline varies depending on the magnitude of the program or project being implemented, as well as the data available to measure the indicators that have been designed. on this basis, the team in charge of the formulation of the project must design the field work to collect the data.

Part 2.7.3 synthesizes the experience of the food and agriculture organization (fao) in mexico in the preparation of the baseline of the Programs of the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa) regarding two primary tools: a) sample design and b) survey questionnaire.


22


case study 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

II


24

chapter 2example of program design

this chapter draws from the experience and tools developed by the fao Project on Policy analysis and evaluation in the framework of the technical assistance cooperation agreement with the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa).

2.1 analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector

the analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources for primary production started from the Diagnosis of the Rural and Fishing Sector of Mexico2. the diagnosis posits as the central problem the unsustainable development of such sector and states that one of the main causes of this problem is the degradation of natural resources and, in turn, indicates as secondary causes the over exploitation of fishing resources, the erosion of soil, the salinization of soil, the over exploitation of water resources, the contamination of water and soil, and the emission of greenhouse gases (figure 13).

2 http://smye.info/cuestionario_final/diagnostico/menu_f.php

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

fIguRE 13. ProbLem tree of the degradation of natUraL resoUrces in the rUraL and fishing sector

Source: Diagnóstico del sector rural y pesquero de México. FAO-SAGARPA.

high emission of carbon from

production activities of

the rural and fishing sector

mishandling of agriculture and

aquaculture production

waste

excessive use of

agrochemicals

Emissions of greenhouse

gases

Contamination of water and

soil

overexploitation of water

resources

energy distorting subsidies

Low irrigation efficiency

no or little control of

concessions or quotas of water

use

overconcessioning of water use

Salinization of soil

excessive irrigation

saline intrusion

Erosion of soil

inadequate tillage

techniques

excessive stocking rate

deforestation

Use of soil not apt for agricultural production

overexploitation of fishing resources

excess of small-scale

fishing vessels

excessive capture

of juvenile organisms

closed seasons not

enforced

degradation of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector


in turn, each one of these causes is explained by more specific causes. for example, causes of the overexploitation of fishing resources include the excess of small-scale fishing vessels, the excessive capture of juvenile organisms, and failure to enforce closed seasons.

based on this problem tree, experts in the area proposed the following objectives tree, in which the desired situations are expressed (figure 14).

fIguRE 14. objectives tree for the design of a Program on sUstainabLe Use of natUraL resoUrces in the rUraL and fishing

sector of mexico

carbon is sequestered in the rural sector

an integral system of waste management is implemented

the use of agrochemicals

is reduced

The generation of greenhouse

gas emissions in the

agriculture and fishing sector is reduced

farm and aquacultural production

units prevent contamination of water and soil through

best practices of waste and input

management

Water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water

balance

irrigation efficiency is improved

Soil salinization is

reduced

irrigation techniques by micro-sprinkler are established

salts are leached from

soils

Soil erosion is controlled

tillage techniques are

adequate

stocking rate is kept at levels that avoid soil compaction

Loss of plant cover in farms

is avoided

fishing resources are made use of

at a rate lower than that of their

regeneration

small scale fishing is regulated

fishing gear is used that avoid

the capture of juvenile organisms

closed seasons are

enforced

natural resources are used sustainably in the rural and fishing sector

the emission of carbon in

agricultural and fishing activities

is reduced

measures to prevent the

accumulation of salts are established

the use of soil not apt for

agricultural production is

avoided

the irrigation system in the primary sector

is orderly


26

as can be seen, the main task in the construction of the objectives tree consists of substituting all the negative situations of the problem tree with positive situations. through this process it is possible to delineate the objectives of a program or project. however, to concretely define its outputs and activities, it is necessary to do an alternatives analysis. regarding the central problem, this becomes the Purpose upon expressing the desired situation that reverses the negative situation expressed in the problem (figure 15). the outputs should be those in number and nature that are sufficient and necessary to achieve the Purpose.

Purpose. natural resources are used sustainably in the rural and fishing sector

output 1fishing resources are made use

of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration

output 2soil erosion is controlled

output 3soil salinization is reduced

output 4water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water

balance

output 5farm and aquacultural production

units prevent contamination of water and soil through best practices of

waste and input management

output 6the generation of greenhouse gases in the agriculture and

fishing sector is reduced

fIguRE 15. PUrPose and oUtPUts in the rUraL and fishing sector


for their part, in order to achieve each output, the necessary and sufficient activities to contribute to carrying out such output should be specified (figure 16).

fIguRE 16. generaL activities for each oUtPUt

output 1fishing resources are made use of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration

output 2soil erosion is controlled

output 3soil salinization is reduced

output 4water resources are made use of

maintaining a positive water balance

output 5farm and aquacultural production units prevent contamination of water and soil

through best practices of waste and input management

output 6the generation of greenhouse gases in the

agriculture sector is reduced

1.1 regulate small scale fishing

1.2 Use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms

1.3 enforce closed seasons

2.1 adopt adequate tillage techniques

2.2 apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction

2.3 implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units

2.4 implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production

3.1 establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems

3.2 Leach salts from soil

3.3 establish measures that prevent salt accumulation

4.1 regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector

4.2 Promote the efficient use of water

5.1 implement an integral waste management system

5.2 implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals

6.1 implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector

6.2 implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities

once the activities relevant for each of the outputs are defined, the alternatives pertinent for carrying out the activities should be analyzed and selected.


28

output 1: Fishing resources are made use of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration

a C T I V I T I e s :

1.1 Regulate small scale fishing

1.2 use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms

1.3 Enforce closed seasons

activity 1.1 Regulate small scale fishing

for activity 1.1 “regulate small scale fishing”, three alternatives were identified. the first one proposes the regulation of small scale fishing through the implementation of a system of transferrable fishing quotas according to the biomass limit. the second alternative suggests adjusting the number of grantable permits according to the capacity of each region, such that when the number of grantable permits is exceeded cancellation is applied, and when the number of grantable permits is below the limit the legalization of illegal fishermen is allowed. the third alternative proposes the buyback of fishing permits. the three alternatives are based on the need to know the biomass limit per fishery to establish a number of grantable permits and to strengthen oversight.

Alternative A. Implement a system of transferrable fishing quotas based on biomass limits

a. evaluate the biomass limit in each fisheryi. establish the number of grantable permits

b. implement a system of transferrable fishing quotas according to the biomass limitc. identify and remove illegal fishermen

i. establish a temporary employment program for illegal fishermend. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector

Alternative b. Adjust the number of grantable permits based on the capacity of each region


b. identify and remove illegal fishermeni. establish a temporary employment program for illegal fishermen

c. adjust the number of grantable permitsi. cancellation of fishing permits according to the number of grantable permits (when the limit of

permissible biomass is exceeded) ii. Legalize illegal fishermen according to the number of grantable permits (when the permissible

biomass is not exceeded)d. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector

Alternative C. buyback fishing permits


b. identify and remove illegal fishermenii. establish a Program of temporary employment for illegal fishermen

c. buy back fishing permitsd. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector


activity 1.2 use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms

for activity 1.2 “Use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms” two alternatives were identified, which are complementary:

Alternative A. Substitute fishing equipment and gear

a. substitute and acquire fishing equipment and gear

i. Provide subsidies for the purchase of fishing equipment and gear that prevent the capture of juvenile organisms

Alternative b. Train fishermen

a. train fishermen

i. Prepare a catalog of fishing gearii. carry out demonstration projects in which the capture of juvenile organisms is prevented

activity 1.3 enforce closed seasons

only one alternative was identified for activity 1.3 “enforce closed seasons”, which consists of:

Alternative A. Strengthen the activities of inspection and oversight

a. strengthen the activities of inspection and oversight

i. increase the inspection and oversight corpsii. train the inspection and oversight corps

iii. Purchase of equipment for inspectors and oversight personnel

b. implement a penalties system

c. develop campaigns to raise awareness of enforcement of closed seasons

output 2: soil erosion is controlled


2.1 Adopt adequate tillage techniques

2.2 Apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction

2.3 Implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units

2.4 Implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production


30

activity 2.1 adopt adequate tillage techniques

four alternatives for activity 2.1 “adopt adequate tillage techniques” are proposed:

Alternative A. Implement conservation tillage

a. grant compensation for soil conservation

b. subsidize soil conservation tillage activities

c. Provide training and technical assistance through “farm schools”

Alternative b. Promote crop rotation and crops interspersed with fruit trees (CIfT)

a. subsidize the purchase of plant material for the promotion of cift

b. Provide training and technical assistance on cift systems through “farm schools”

Alternative C. Implement agro-forestry

a. subsidize the purchase of plant material for agro-forestry

b. Provide training and technical assistance in agro-forestry through “farm schools”

Alternative D. Conversion to crops that fix soil nutrients

a. develop and disseminate technology packages

b. subsidize the planting of crops that fix soil nutrients

c. Provide training and technical assistance through “farm schools”

activity 2.2 apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction

two alternatives are identified for activity 2.2 “apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction”:

Alternative A. Implement best practices systems in grassland management

a. train livestock producers in the best use of grassland

b. subsidize the implementation of best practices in grassland management

Alternative b. Promote the stabling of livestock

a. Provide training to producers for the production and conservation of low cost forage

b. subsidize the purchase of farm assets for the stabling of livestock

c. Provide training and technical assistance for handling stabled livestock


activity 2.3 implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units

two alternatives are proposed for activity 2.3 “implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units”:

Alternative A. Control the expansion of farm land

a. implement penalties for changing land use

Alternative b. Recover abandoned farm land

a. develop and disseminate technology packages

b. subsidize the application of technology packages through which farm land can be recovered

activity 2.4 implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production

as an alternative for activity 2.4 “implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production” the following is proposed:

Alternative A. Control the expansion of farm land

b. implement penalties for changing land use

output 3: soil salinization is reduced


3.1 Establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems

3.2 leach salts from soil

3.3 Establish measures that prevent salt accumulation


32

activity 3.1 establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems

the following are considered alternatives of activity 3.1 “establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems”:

Alternative A. Subsidize the purchase of micro-sprinkler irrigation systems

a. Provide subsidies for the purchase of sprinkler irrigation equipment

Alternative b. Provide training and technical assistance for the use of technified irrigation

a. training and technical assistance on the use and implementation of technified irrigation systems

activity 3.2 leach salts from soil

the following alternatives are established for activity 3.2 “Leach salts from soil”:

Alternative A. grant subsidies for soil washing activities a. Provide subsidies for soil washing activities

Alternative b. Provide training and technical assistance for soil washing activitiesa. training and technical assistance on soil washing activities

activity 3.3 establish measures that prevent salt accumulation

the following alternatives are considered for activity 3.3 “establish measures that prevent salt accumulation”:

Alternative A. Promote among producers adequate water drainage

a. Provide subsidies for the purchase of sprinkler irrigation equipment

Alternative b. Cancel water use permits in aquifers with salinization problems

a. carry out an analysis to determine the level of salt concentration in aquifers

b. cancel water use permits in aquifers with serious salinization problems

c. determine and implement alternative systems to capture irrigation water

Alternative C. Implement alternative systems for the capture and use of irrigation water

a. subsidize infrastructure and equipment for the capture of rain water

b. give training on management and maintenance of rain water capture systems


Alternative D. Treatment of salty waters

a. Provide support for carrying out salty water treatment works

b. subsidize works for the distribution of treated water

output 4. Water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water balance


4.1 Regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector

4.2 Promote the efficient use of water

activity 4.1 Regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector

the following are alternatives of activity 4.1 “regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector”:

Alternative A. Implement a system of optimal irrigation quotas

a. evaluate the optimum levels of water extraction

b. establish the permissible water extraction quotas

c. establish a penalties system

d. control water levels within the optimum levels

i. establish a penalties system

Alternative b. Regulate the concessioning of water wells

a. evaluate the optimum levels of water extraction

b. establish the permissible water extraction quotas

c. cancellation of illegal wells

Alternative C. Strengthen the oversight system of assigned quotas

a. cancellation of illegal wells

b. control water levels within the currently established quotas

i. establish a penalties system

c. allow the transfer of water quotas


34

activity 4.2 Promote the efficient use of water

two alternatives were formulated for activity 4.2 “Promote the efficient use of water”:

Alternative A. Conditioned use of subsidies for the purchase of equipment and infrastructure

a. establish an incentives system for the efficient use of water through a differentiated subsidy according to water savings

Alternative b. Substitute traditional irrigation systems with technified systems

a. subsidize the purchase of technified irrigation equipment

b. Provide training and technical assistance for the operation of technified irrigation equipment

output 5. Farm and aquaculture production units prevent contamination of water and soil through best practices of waste and input management


5.1 Implement an integral waste management system

5.2 Implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals

activity 5.1 implement an integral waste management system

there are two alternatives for activity 5.1 “implement an integral waste management system”:

Alternative A. Promote waste management practices according to the characteristics of producers

a. implement organic waste management programs. for example, production of compost, use of manure as organic fertilizer, installation of biodigestors, etc.

b. implement a program of integral inorganic waste management that includes the establishment of chemical waste disposal sites in rural areas


Alternative b. Implement industrial ecology practices in the agriculture and fishing sector

a. identify the main wastes generated in the primary sector

b. identify possibilities of use of such wastes

c. Provide training and technical assistance to rural economic Units (reU) for the identification of wastes generated at production farm units and the possibilities for use and exchange of such wastes with other reUs

d. implement an incentives system for producers that participate in the closing the material loop program in agriculture and fishing systems

activity 5.2 implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals

two alternatives were identified for activity 5.2 “implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals”:

Alternative A. Promote the use of organic fertilizer and pesticides

a. Provide training and technical assistance for the use of organic fertilizers and pesticides

Alternative b. Promote the development of organic agriculture

a. Provide training and technical assistance for the development of organic crops

b. implement compensatory schemes to encourage the transition from traditional to organic crops

c. grant support for the marketing of organic agricultural products

output 6: The generation of greenhouse gas emissions in the agriculture and fishing sector is reduced


6.1 Implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector

6.2 Implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities


36

activity 6.1 implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector

the following alternative is identified for activity 6.1 “implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector”:

Alternative A. Incentivize actions to capture carbon in the rural sector

a. identification of the actions that permit carbon sequestration in the primary sector of the rural sector

b. establishment of incentives for the implementation of agro-forestry practices

c. Provide training and technical assistance on agro-forestry and adequate pasture management

d. Promotion of practices to increase the content of organic matter in farm soil

e. reforestation of areas with forestry potential

activity 6.2 implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities

two alternatives were identified for activity 6.2 “implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities”:

Alternative A. Promote activities for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions

a. identify low greenhouse gas emissions activities in the primary sector

b. Promote the use of bioenergy and renewable energy in farm and fishing units

c. implement training programs for the preparation and use of fertilizers and pesticides low in carbon

d. Provide training regarding the application of nitrogen fertilizer for its more efficient use and on application techniques to diminish emissions due to volatilization

e. Promote low carbon animal manure management systems

f. implement programs to prevent open burning in farm fields

Alternative b. Promote energy savings and efficiency in the agriculture and fishing sector

a. identify the main sources of energy consumption in the primary sector

b. substitution of high fossil fuel consumption equipment with more efficient equipment

c. implement cogeneration processes in farm units

d. eliminate government subsidies that incentivize the consumption of fossil fuels

e. Promote the use of animal manure for the generation of energy in the primary sector


fIg

uR

E 1

7. a

Lter

nat

ives

tr

ee (

Par

t 1)

fish

ing

reso

urce

s ar

e m

ade

use

of a

t a ra

te lo

wer

than

that

of

thei

r reg

ener

atio

n

nat

ura

l res

ourc

es a

re u

sed

su

stai

nab

ly in

th

e ru

ral a

nd

fish

ing

sect

or

reg

ulat

e sm

all

scal

e fis

hing

Use

of f

ishi

ng

gear

that

pr

even

ts

the

capt

ure

of ju

veni

le

orga

nism

s

enfo

rce

clos

ed

seas

ons

ado

pt

adeq

uate

tilla

ge

tech

niqu

es

app

ly m

easu

res

to e

nsur

e th

e st

ocki

ng r

ate

is m

aint

aine

d at

leve

ls th

at

prev

ent s

oil

com

pact

ion

impl

emen

t ac

tions

to

prev

ent t

he lo

ss

of p

lant

cov

er in

fa

rm p

rodu

ctio

n un

its

Soil

eros

ion

is c

ontr

olle

d

impl

emen

t a

syst

em o

f tr

ansf

erra

ble

fishi

ng q

uota

s ba

sed

on

biom

ass

limits

adj

ust t

he

num

ber o

f gr

anta

ble

perm

its

base

d on

the

capa

city

of

each

regi

on

buy

bac

k fis

hing

pe

rmits

subs

titut

e fis

hing

eq

uipm

ent

and

gear

trai

n fis

herm

en

stre

ngth

en

the

activ

ities

of

insp

ectio

n an

d ov

ersi

ght

impl

emen

t co

nser

vatio

n til

lage

Pro

mot

e cr

op r

otat

ion

and

crop

s in

ters

pers

ed

with

frui

t tr

ees

impl

emen

t ag

ro-f

ores

try

con

vers

ion

to c

rops

th

at fi

x so

il nu

tient

s

impl

emen

t be

st p

ract

ices

sy

stem

s in

gr

assl

and

man

agem

ent

Pro

mot

e th

e st

ablin

g of

liv

esto

ck

con

trol

the

expa

nsio

n of

fa

rm la

nd

rec

over

ab

ando

ned

farm

land

con

trol

the

expa

nsio

n of

fa

rm la

nd

impl

emen

t ac

tions

to

prev

ent t

he

use

of la

nd n

ot

apt f

or fa

rm

prod

uctio

n


38

fIg

uR

E 1

7. a

Lter

nat

ives

tr

ee (

Par

t 2)

nat

ura

l res

ourc

es a

re u

sed

su

stai

nab

ly in

th

e ru

ral a

nd

fish

ing

sect

or

Wat

er re

sour

ces

are

mad

e us

e of

mai

ntai

ning

a p

ositi

ve w

ater

ba

lanc

e

subs

idiz

e th

e pu

rcha

se o

f m

icro

-spr

ayin

g irr

igat

ion

syst

ems

Pro

vide

trai

ning

an

d te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce

for t

he u

se

of te

chni

fied

irrig

atio

n

gra

nt s

ubsi

dies

to

car

ry o

ut

soil

was

hing

ac

tiviti

es

Pro

vide

trai

ning

an

d te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce fo

r so

il w

ashi

ng

activ

ities

Pro

mot

e am

ong

prod

ucer

s ad

equa

te w

ater

dr

aina

ge

can

cel w

ater

us

e pe

rmits

in

aqui

fers

with

sa

liniz

atio

n pr

oble

ms

impl

emen

t al

tern

ativ

e sy

stem

s fo

r the

ca

ptur

e an

d us

e of

irrig

atio

n w

ater

trea

tmen

t of

salty

wat

ers

impl

emen

t a

syst

em

of o

ptim

al

irrig

atio

n qu

otas

reg

ulat

e th

e co

nces

sion

ing

of w

ater

wel

ls

stre

ngth

en

the

over

sigh

t sy

stem

of

assi

gned

qu

otas

con

ditio

ned

use

of

subs

idie

s fo

r th

e pu

rcha

se o

f eq

uipm

ent a

nd

infr

astr

uctu

re

sust

itute

tr

aditi

onal

irr

igat

ion

syst

ems

with

te

chni

fied

syst

ems

esta

blis

h m

easu

res

that

pr

even

t sal

t ac

cum

ulat

ion

reg

ulat

e th

e irr

igat

ion

syst

em

in th

e pr

imar

y se

ctor

Pro

mot

e th

e ef

ficie

nt u

se o

f w

ater

Soil

salin

izat

ion

is re

duce

d

esta

blis

hm

icro

-spr

inkl

er

irrig

atio

n sy

stem

s

Leac

h sa

lts

from

soi

l


fIg

uR

E 1

7. a

Lter

nat

ives

tr

ee (

Par

t 3)

nat

ura

l res

ourc

es a

re u

sed

su

stai

nab

ly in

th

e ru

ral a

nd

fish

ing

sect

or

The

gene

ratio

n of

gre

enho

use

gase

s in

the

agric

ultu

re s

ecto

r is

redu

ced

Pro

mot

e w

aste

m

anag

emen

t pr

actic

es a

ccor

ding

to

the

char

acte

ristic

s of

pr

oduc

ers

impl

emen

t an

inte

gral

w

aste

man

agem

ent

syst

em

farm

and

aqu

acul

ture

pro

duct

ion

units

pr

even

t con

tam

inat

ion

of w

ater

and

soi

l th

roug

h go

od p

ract

ices

of w

aste

and

in

put m

anag

emen

t

impl

emen

t ind

ustr

ial

ecol

ogy

prac

tices

in

the

agric

ultu

re a

nd

fishi

ng s

ecto

r

Pro

mot

e th

e us

e of

or

gani

c fe

rtili

zer a

nd

pest

icid

es

Pro

mot

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

orga

nic

agric

ultu

re

ince

ntiv

ize

actio

ns to

ca

ptur

e ca

rbon

in th

e ru

ral e

nviro

nmen

t

Pro

mot

e ac

tiviti

es

for t

he re

duct

ion

of

gree

nhou

se g

ase

emis

sion

s

Pro

mot

e en

ergy

sa

ving

s an

d ef

ficie

ncy

in th

e ag

ricul

ture

and

fis

hing

sec

tor

impl

emen

t mea

sure

s to

red

uce

the

use

of

agro

chem

ical

s

impl

emen

t ac

tions

for

carb

on

sequ

estr

atio

n in

the

rura

l sec

tor

impl

emen

t mea

sure

s fo

r th

e re

duct

ion

of c

arbo

n em

issi

ons

in a

gric

ultu

re

and

fishi

ng a

ctiv

ities


40

2.2 development of indicators of the budgetary programs in Mexico

in addition to objectives and alternatives, indicators are central to the design of a program or project. they measure the achievement of the objectives, the product of the outputs and the carrying out of the activities. in the case of mexico, the budgetary programs use the Logical framework, also called indicators matrix for results (imr)3.

as with the Logical framework, the imr includes the objectives of a program (narrative summary), the indicators, the means of verification and the assumptions or risks that could influence its success or failure.

with regard to the indicators of the imr, a performance indicator reference sheet is prepared which contains, among other things, the following elements4 for adequate monitoring and evaluation:

a. name of the indicator. this is the expression that identifies the indicator and which indicates what is to be measured with it.

b. Method of calculation. this refers to the algebraic expression of the indicator; that is, the simple explanation of the way in which the variables are related in order to calculate the indicator.

c. Direction of the indicator. this refers to the direction the behavior of the indicator should have in order to identify when its performance is positive or negative. it can have a rising or descending direction. when the direction is rising, the target will always be greater than the baseline value; thus, if the result is higher than planned this is indicative of good performance, and when it is lower it means a negative performance. when the direction is descending, the target will always be less than the baseline value, and therefore if the result is less than the planned target this is indicative of good performance, and when it is greater it indicates a negative performance.

d. frequency of measurement. this refers to the time frequency with which the measurement of the indicator is made (period between measurements).

e. unit of measure. this refers to the specific determination of the form in which the results of the measurement upon applying the indicator is to be expressed.

f. baseline. this is the initial value of the indicator that is taken as a reference to compare with the objective’s progress.

g. Target. a target allows for the establishment of limits or levels of achievement by indicating an expected level of performance. the target that is determined should be oriented toward significantly improving the results and impacts; that is, it should be ambitious but at the same time feasible to achieve; therefore, the target should be realistic with respect to the time period, and the human and financial resources involved.

h. Warning parameters. these identify whether or not the behavior of the indicator is adequate or according to expectations:

• acceptable (green)

• at risk (yellow)

• critical (red)

i. Means of verification. they identify sources of information in order to measure the indicators and verify that the objectives were met.

below there is an example of the identification of the basic elements of the indicators of sagarPa’s Program to support investment in equipment and infrastructure (table 5).

3 the imr is a tool that makes it possible to link the different instruments for the design, organization, execution, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement of the program, which is the result of a planning process done based on the Lfm.

4 this information was taken from the annexes of the official circular 307-a-1142 issued by the ministry of finance and Public credit (secretaría de hacienda y crédito Público) (shcP) of mexico in relation to the construction of the imr of the budgetary programs.


TAb

lE 5

. P

erfo

rm

an

ce

ind

icat

or

ref

eren

ce

shee

t o

f th

e im

r o

f sa

ga

rPa

’s P

ro

gr

am

to

sU

PP

or

t in

vest

men

t in

eQ

UiP

men

t a

nd

infr

ast

rU

ctU

re

obj

ectiv

e le

vel

nar

rativ

e

sum

mar

yn

ame

Met

hod

of

calc

ulat

ion

Dire

ctio

nfr

eque

ncy

of

mea

sure

men

t

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t

bas

elin

eTa

rget

sTr

affic

Sig

nals

Mea

ns o

f

verif

icat

ion

Valu

eye

arCyc

le

targ

et

Targ

et to

year

201

2

gre

en-

yello

w

yello

w-

Red

goa

l

con

trib

ute

to

incr

easi

ng th

e

leve

l of i

ncom

e of

rura

l pro

duce

rs

and

fishe

rmen

thro

ugh

the

capi

taliz

atio

n of

thei

r eco

nom

ic

units

rat

e of

varia

tion

of re

al

net i

ncom

e of

rura

l pro

duce

rs

and

fishe

rmen

[(r

eal n

et in

com

e

of r

ural

pro

duce

rs

and

fishe

rmen

in

year

t0+

i / r

eal

net i

ncom

e of

rur

al

prod

ucer

s an

d

fishe

rmen

in y

ear

t 0) -1

]*10

0

ris

ing

trie

nnia

lP

erce

ntag

e

ave

rage

annu

al

inco

me

of

prod

ucer

s

in 2

008

:

65,1

88

peso

s

2008

not

appl

icab

le5%

±15%

±30

%

dat

abas

e of

bene

ficia

ries

surv

ey

Pur

pose

rur

al p

rodu

cers

and

fishe

rmen

incr

ease

the

leve

ls

of c

apita

lizat

ion

of th

eir e

cono

mic

units

Per

cent

age

of

incr

ease

of t

he

real

val

ue o

f

asse

ts in

rur

al

and

fishi

ng

econ

omic

uni

ts

[(r

eal v

alue

of

asse

ts in

rur

al a

nd

fishi

ng e

cono

mic

units

in y

ear t

0+i/

valu

e of

ass

ets

in

rura

l and

fish

ing

econ

omic

uni

ts in

year

t 0) -1

]*10

0

ris

ing

trie

nnia

lP

erce

ntag

e

ave

rage

valu

e of

prod

ucer

s’

asse

ts

in 2

008

:

19,2

29

peso

s

2008

not

appl

icab

le5%

±15%

±30

%

dat

abas

e of

bene

ficia

ries

surv

ey

out

put 1

Pro

duct

ion

infr

astr

uctu

re

avai

labl

e fo

r

prod

uctio

n un

its’

rura

l and

fish

ing

proj

ects

Per

cent

age

of r

ural

and

fishi

ng

econ

omic

uni

ts

with

pro

duct

ion

infr

astr

uctu

re

avai

labl

e

(num

ber o

f

rura

l and

fish

ing

econ

omic

uni

ts

endo

wed

with

prod

uctio

n

infr

astr

uctu

re /

tota

l

num

ber o

f rur

al a

nd

fishi

ng e

cono

mic

units

) * 1

00

ris

ing

ann

ual

Per

cent

age

36.8

%20

084

4.36

%4

4.4%

±10%

±20

%

cer

tific

ates

of

clos

ing

and

settl

emen

ts

stor

ed in

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

Co

nti

nu

ed

on

nex

t p

age

>


42

obj

ectiv

e le

vel

nar

rativ

e

sum

mar

yn

ame

Met

hod

of

calc

ulat

ion

Dire

ctio

nfr

eque

ncy

of

mea

sure

men

t

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t

bas

elin

eTa

rget

sTr

affic

Sig

nals

Mea

ns o

f

verif

icat

ion

Valu

eye

arCyc

le

targ

et

Targ

et to

year

201

2

gre

en-

yello

w

yello

w-

Red

out

put 2

mac

hine

ry a

nd

equi

pmen

t

avai

labl

e fo

r

prod

uctio

n un

its’

rura

l and

fish

ing

proj

ects

Per

cent

age

of r

ural

and

fishi

ng

econ

omic

uni

ts

with

mac

hine

ry

and

equi

pmen

t

(num

ber o

f

rura

l and

fish

ing

econ

omic

uni

ts

endo

wed

with

mac

hine

ry a

nd

equi

pmen

t / t

otal

num

ber o

f rur

al a

nd

fishi

ng e

cono

mic

units

) * 1

00

ris

ing

ann

ual

Per

cent

age

36.6

%20

0826

.33%

26.4

%±1

0%±

20%

cer

tific

ates

of

clos

ing

and

settl

emen

ts

stor

ed in

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

out

put 3

impr

oved

gen

etic

mat

eria

l ava

ilabl

e

for g

reat

er

effic

ienc

y of

prod

uctio

n un

its

Per

cent

age

of r

ural

and

fishi

ng

econ

omic

uni

ts

with

impr

oved

gene

tic m

ater

ial

(num

ber o

f

rura

l and

fish

ing

econ

omic

uni

ts w

ith

impr

oved

gen

etic

mat

eria

l / t

otal

num

ber o

f rur

al a

nd

fishi

ng e

cono

mic

units

) * 1

00

ris

ing

ann

ual

Per

cent

age

26.6

1%20

0829

.31%

29.4

%±1

0%±

20%

cer

tific

ates

of

clos

ing

and

settl

emen

ts

stor

ed in

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

Sour

ce: D

ata

obta

ined

from

the

IMR

of t

he P

rogr

am to

Sup

port

Inve

stm

ent i

n Eq

uipm

ent a

nd In

fras

truc

ture

201

1 by

the

Mex

ican

Min

istr

y of

Agr

icul

ture

(SA

GA

RP

A).

The

orig

inal

IMR

con

tain

ed

indi

ctor

s th

at w

ere

not i

nclu

ded

in th

is m

atrix

due

to th

e fa

ct th

at c

erta

in d

ata

wer

e m

issi

ng, s

uch

as th

e so

urce

of v

erifi

catio

n, th

e ba

selin

e va

lue

or it

invo

lved

indi

cato

rs th

at c

anno

t be

mon

itore

d.


2.3 Baseline study of sagaRPa Programs

the baseline study of the sagarPa Programs was conducted in order to have baseline data that would make it possible to evaluate the effects of the Programs on the target population to which they are addressed. according to the rules of operation of sagarPa Programs, the target population is composed of “the individuals or entities that, individually or collectively, engage in agricultural, livestock, fishing, aquaculture, agroindustrial, and any other rural activities”5.

the baseline study was conducted, independently, in 31 of the 32 states of the mexican republic in order to be representative at that level, and subsequently each of the state databases was integrated into a national database.

for the collection of data in the field, the same sampling design and survey methodology was applied in the 31 states to obtain the data necessary for the calculation of the baseline indicators.

a) SAMPlE DESIgn

Step 1: Construction of the sampling frame

the sampling design began with the construction of the sampling frame, which was developed in each state by using beneficiary lists of federal and state programs, producer registries, and administrative registries such as the national fishing registry, as well as any other list related to rural and fishing activities.

5 sagarPa. rules of operation for the sagarPa 2008, 2009, and 2010 Programs.

TAblE 6. PotentiaL PoPULation and target PoPULation

the potential population corresponds to the total population that presents the need and/or

problem and that justifies the design of a program or project. however, due to financial or time

restrictions that do not permit benefiting all of such population, it becomes necessary to make a

distinction between the potential population and the target population.

the target population is a subgroup of the potential population on which attention is focused.

For example, for the Program for the sustainability of natural Resources, which provides support

and services to develop projects promoting an appropriate use of natural resources, the target

population entitled to receive such support is defined as “the individuals or entities that engage

in agriculture and livestock production activities that are located in the municipalities classified as

the greatest priority based on the degree of deterioration, scarcity or overexploitation of productive

resources”.


44

based on the analysis of compiled data, three subpopulations of rural economic Units6 (reU) were identified. these

were:

i. Ne: rural economic Units that had the information to be classified in strata7.

ii. Nne: rural economic Units that did not have sufficient information to be stratified.

iii. Nnl: rural economic Units about which there was no information at all but there was knowledge about their

existence based on previous information provided by the national survey on occupation and employment

(enoe).

hence, the universe of the programs’ target population was formed from the sum of the three subpopulations:

N = Ne + Nne + Nnl

in total, 5,424,430 rural economic Units were counted, of which 3,919,639 (72.2%) were stratified, 649,333 (12.0%)

were not possible to stratify, and 855,458 (15.8%) were not possible to list. more details are available in annex 1.

once the sampling frame was constructed, the next step was to determine the sampling design for each type of

subpopulation.

i) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of STRATIfIAblE REus (Ne )

for the subpopulation of stratifiable reUs a random stratified sampling (rss) was used. subsequently, a simple

random sampling (srs) was applied to each stratus independently. to obtain the sampling frame for each stratus (ni),

the reUs were considered according to the degree of territorial marginalization where they are located (high/very high,

medium, and low/very low) and the level of farm assets (low, medium and high), thereby forming nine strata (table 7).

6 a reU is defined, according to the rules of operation of sagaraPa Programs, as the individual or entity, whether or not tied to land, that engages in agricultural, fishing or other production, industrial or services activities in the rural sector.

7 the strata were classified according to the farm assets they had and the degree of marginalization.

TAblE 7. strata in which the target PoPULation was cLassified

stratalevel of assets

low Medium High

degree of marginality of

the locality

high/ very high e11 e12 e13

Medium e21 e22 e23

low/ very low e31 e32 e33

Source: FAO. Guía metodológica para el levantamiento de la línea de base de los Programas de la SAGARPA.


once the strata were defined, the sample size of each stratus on which the baseline was conducted was determined using the following formula:

where:

ne = size of the sample for the group ne

Ne = number of units of the subpopulation composed of stratifiable reUs

Nij = number of units of the target population of stratus ij (population size of each stratus).

sij2 = variance of stratus ij (estimated based on income data taking as a source the evaluation of alianza para el campo

2006)

V = d 2/Z 2 α/2

d = margin of error (each state could apply a margin of error between 0.03 and 0.11)

Z 2 α/2 = value of tables for a certain confidence level (each state determined its own level of confidence, oscillating between 0.90 and 0.97)

k = number of strata: 9

once the sample size (ne ) was obtained for this subpopulation in each state, the assignment of sample size by stratus (nij ) was done using the Optimum Assignment procedure; that is, more units were selected in the groups of greater variability; the formula used was the following:

where Nij and sij were already previously defined.

for stratifiable reUs, annex 2 presents the sample size for each stratus for all states. nationally there was a total of 20,753 sampling reUs for this subpopulation.

ii) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of non-STRATIfIAblE REus (Nne )

for the subpopulation of non-stratifiable reUs (Nne ) the simple random sampling (srs) was applied. in this way it was guaranteed that 12.0% of the reU that were in this situation at the national level had the same probability of being selected. the state sample size for this group of reUs (Nne) was determined by using the following formula:


46

where nne represents the state sample size for non-stratifiable reUs; and Ne and ne correspond to the variables as defined previously.

annex 3 presents the sample size results by state for the non-stratifiable subpopulation. nationally, there was a total sample of 3,360 reUs for this listed subpopulation, but with not enough data to be classified as stratifiable.

iii) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of non-lISTED REus (Nnl )

for the subpopulation of non-listed reUs (Nnl ) the systematic sampling method was applied. this subpopulation represented 15.7% of the target population. the sample size for this subpopulation was obtained by using the following formula:

where nnl represents the sample size for the non-listed units (Nnl ).

annex 4 presents the sample size results by state for the non-listed subpopulation. nationally, the sample for this subpopulation reached 2,214 reUs. finally, the sample size (n) for each state resulted from the summation of three subsamples:

n = ne + nne + nnl

n = 20,753 + 3,360 + 2,214 n = 26,327

Step 2: Sample selection

the third and last step consisted of selecting the sample units of each subpopulation. as for the listed subpopulations (stratifiable and non-stratifiable) the procedure was the same, while for the non-listed subpopulation a different method was used.

i) PRoCEDuRE foR SElECTIng ThE SAMPlIng unITS of lISTED SubPoPulATIonS

once the sample sizes ne and nne were determined for each state, the sample units to be surveyed were selected systematically. for example, in the case of the subpopulation of stratifiable reUs the following was done:

1. the list of heads of reU was put in alphabetical order by last name and numbered progressively.

2. a coefficient k was then calculated, which resulted from dividing the total number of the target population of each stratus by the sample size calculated for such stratus. the coefficient k is a partition that is required in the systematic selection of a sample:


the value of k is not rounded off, such that if it is multiplied by the sample size the size of the population is obtained. with this procedure, as many partitions as are required are generated in the population according to the sample size. from each of these partitions one element was selected.

3. a number s was randomly selected from the closed interval between 1 and k8.

4. from the number s, a direct and systematic selection was initiated, within the sampling framework, of the target population to be surveyed, such that the selected units were those resulting from rounding off each one of the following numbers separately: s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … until completing the nij sample units9.

the inclusion of the random number s in the pattern s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … guarantees equal probability of selection for the entire population. in this way it is possible to obtain a sample with behavior similar to that of a simple random sample, with the advantage that the systematic sampling makes it possible to verify the sample selection10.

ii) PRoCEDuRE foR SElECTIng ThE SAMPlE unITS of ThE non-lISTED SubPoPulATIon

the procedure for obtaining the members of the sample nnl could be carried out with two different methodologies: systematic sampling or snowball sampling.

Systematic sampling

1. in each state all the rural localities that had never had access to the sagarPa Programs were listed (crossing the list of localities obtained from the registry of beneficiaries against the list of localities by state according to the 2007 agriculture, Livestock and forestry census).

2. the ejidal commissary, representative of the locality, or any other source of authorized information was contacted to obtain an alphabetical list of the existing reUs.

3. k= (Nnl ) / (nnl ) was calculated.

4. a number s was selected randomly from the closed interval between 1 and k.

5. Parting from the number s, a direct and systematic selection was initiated, within the list of reUs obtained through step 2, such that the units being selected were those resulting from separately rounding off each one of the following numbers: s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … until the nnl sampling units were completed.

Snowball sampling

the snowball sampling method is appropriate in situations in which the elements that make up the sampling framework are not known, but their existence is known although they are not listed in any registry.

the application of this sampling method consists of:

1. identifying and preparing a list of all rural localities that have not been reached by the governmental programs;

2. making a random selection of these localities in order to determine where the survey would be applied.

8 this operation can be carried out with the help of a spreadsheet like excel.

9 numbers with decimals greater than or equal to 0.5 are rounded to the whole number immediately above. numbers with decimals less than 0.5 are rounded to the whole number immediately below.

10 in the event that the support of the Programs had been granted to groups, the members of the groups became part of the sampling framework on which the design was applied.


48

in each locality selected, the first reUs are located and interviewed (with the help of the local authorities). these initial interviewees are asked to name other elements of the target population (generally other reUs of the same locality) to be interviewed, who in turn name other reUs for interview. the process continues until the required sample size for this subpopulation is met.

b) QuESTIonnAIRE DESIgn

the instrument that was designed for gathering field data consisted of a questionnaire, which was structured to collect data that allows for the calculation of indicators. the questionnaire structure is shown in table 8. the questionnaire itself is presented as tool 1 in this document.

MoDulE PRInCIPAl ToPIC

i identification of the interviewee age, gender, level of schooling, size of family, principal activity.

ii rural economic unit Land tenure and source of moisture, agricultural activities, livestock activities, aquaculture activities, fishing activities, transformed or processed products.

iii other income remittances, etc.

iv governmental aid aid received from development programs.

v financial services Loan institutions, loan amounts and use of the loans.

vi agro-food and fishing information access to and use of information for production decision making.

vii satisfaction of the beneficiary satisfaction of the beneficiaries with the program and the aid received.

viii complementary questions other questions of interest.

Source: Instrumentos y guía metodológica para el levantamiento de la línea de base de los Programas 2008 de SAGARPA.

to ensure the quality of data collected, care was taken that the questionnaire had the following attributes: pertinence of the questions (correct technical formulation), language used (simplicity, precision, fluidity), consistency (coherence among topics and questions), and extension (length of the interview).

conducting a baseline study is extremely important because it makes it possible to measure the results and impacts of a program or project. through the baseline, information is revealed for measuring the effectiveness and determining the continuation, modification or conclusion of the policy instruments that are being implemented. hence, the process carried out to collect field information for the baseline was indispensable for calculating the indicators established in each of the sagarPa Programs.

TAblE 8. QUestionnaire strUctUre for condUcting the baseLine stUdy of the sagarPa Programs


S u m m a r y

the design is the second stage of a program or project cycle. it begins with the analysis of objectives and ends with the construction of the Logical framework. the first step consists of preparing an objectives tree based on the analysis of the problem tree (prepared in the diagnostic stage). the objectives tree is a logical representation of the desired situation to be reached through an intervention, and the means that are required to achieve it. these means are analyzed to identify the most convenient strategy in terms of relevance, efficiency, efficacy, financial viability, institutional viability, and environmental impact in the analysis of alternatives.

from the selection of the best alternatives the activities that would make it possible to produce the outputs are determined. the outputs, in turn, lead to the achievement of the Purpose which in itself contributes to the goal. the coherent relationship among these four levels of objectives is known as vertical logic.

subsequently, the indicators and means of verification are defined. these elements are inseparable from the objectives, since it is based on these that performance of a project can be measured and its effectiveness determined. the coherent concurrence of these three elements constitutes the horizontal logic or coherence among objective, indicator and means of verification.

the final step is to determine the important assumptions or premises on which the implementation of a program or project rests, and the realization of which constitutes a condition for advancing towards the achievement of the next objective level. this is known as diagonal logic.

this series of analytical steps utilizing logical methods is synthesized in the Logical framework, which is an instrument that contains the most important elements that make up a program or project.

the use of the Logical framework method in the development of this stage is very important. among other advantages, this method impedes the existence of multiple objectives in a project or program, or the inclusion of activities that do not lead to achieving the objective. in addition, it leads to clearly defined mechanisms for the adequate implementation and monitoring of the program or project.

finally, it is in this stage that the baseline or base measurement of the project or program indicators is conducted. this stage is carried out before the start of the program’s implementation, since it constitutes the point of reference upon which the progress of a program or project towards the achievement of the objectives is determined.


50


tools4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

III


52

Too

l 1

Qu

esti

onn

aire

for

the

bas

elin

e of

th

e ru

ral a

nd

fish

ing

sect

or p

rogr

ams

inte

rvie

w d

ate

day

mon

thye

ar

QU

esti

on

na

ire

nU

mb

er

QU

esti

on

na

ire

co

de

nam

ec

ode

stat

e1•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

mun

icip

ality

2•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

Loca

lity3

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

1/ s

ee t

able

of s

tate

s.

2/ s

ee t

able

of m

unic

ipal

ities

.

3/ s

ee t

able

of l

ocal

ities

.

nam

e of

inte

rvie

wer

:•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

nam

e(s)

firs

t las

t nam

ese

cond

last

nam

e


beg

inn

ing

OF

THe

in

Ter

VieW

goo

d m

orni

ng-a

fter

noon

-eve

ning

, i b

elon

g to

a te

am o

f int

ervi

ewer

s w

ho a

re g

athe

ring

data

to e

valu

ate

the

rura

l and

fis

hing

sec

tor

prog

ram

s. w

ith th

is q

uest

ionn

aire

it

is in

tend

ed to

col

lect

dat

a on

pro

duct

ion

activ

ities

car

ried

out b

y pr

oduc

ers

and

the

oper

atio

n of

aid

pro

gram

s, in

ord

er to

rev

ise

and

impr

ove

thei

r pe

rfor

man

ce. f

or

thes

e pu

rpos

es, i

kin

dly

ask

you

to g

ive

me

a fe

w m

inut

es o

f you

r tim

e to

ans

wer

the

follo

win

g qu

estio

ns. t

he in

form

atio

n yo

u pr

ovid

e m

e w

ill b

e ke

pt c

onfid

entia

l and

w

ill b

e us

ed e

xclu

sive

ly fo

r pr

ogra

m e

valu

atio

n.

I. Id

entif

icat

ion

of t

he in

terv

iew

ee

a) W

hat

is y

our

nam

e?•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

(ref

ers

to th

e pe

rson

to b

e in

terv

iew

ed a

nd c

an b

e pr

imar

y pr

oduc

ers,

pro

cess

ors,

mar

kete

rs o

r ot

hers

).n

ame(

s)fi

rst l

ast n

ame

seco

nd la

st n

ame

b) n

ame

of in

form

ant:

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

(if t

he p

erso

n se

lect

ed fo

r th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

ques

tionn

aire

is n

ot a

vaila

ble,

rec

ord

the

nam

e of

the

info

rman

t).

nam

e(s)

firs

t las

t nam

ese

cond

last

nam

e

c) W

hat

is y

our

addr

ess?

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

d)

Whe

re is

you

r un

it of

pro

duct

ion

loca

ted?

stre

et o

r an

othe

r re

fere

nce

e

xter

ior

num

ber

in

terio

r nu

mbe

r•

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

Loca

lity

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

mun

icip

ality

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

stat

e

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

c

olon

ia, d

evel

opm

ent,

unit

or b

arrio

Loc

ality

mun

icip

ality

stat

ec

ode

cod

ec

ode

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

see

loca

litie

s ta

ble

see

mun

icip

aliti

es t

able

see

stat

es t

able

e) I

nter

view

er: th

e in

terv

iew

ee1 is

:M

an

Wom

an1

/ ref

ers

to th

e pe

rson

sel

ecte

d fo

r th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

ques

tionn

aire

, not

the

info

rman

t. a

sk o

nly

whe

n th

e pe

rson

sel

ecte

d is

not

ava

ilabl

e.


54

f) h

ow o

ld a

re y

ou?

•••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

•

ye

ars

old.

g) W

hat

was

the

last

yea

r or

gra

de o

f sc

hool

you

com

plet

ed?

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

non

e

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of p

rimar

y

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of s

econ

dary

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of h

igh

scho

ol

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of te

chni

cal s

choo

l stu

dies

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of u

nive

rsity

stu

dies

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

of g

radu

ate

stud

ies

Inte

rvie

wer

: h)

Doe

s th

e in

terv

iew

ee s

peak

Spa

nish

?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

i)

Doe

s th

e in

terv

iew

ee s

peak

an

indi

geno

us la

ngua

ge?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

j) h

ow m

any

pers

ons

depe

nd o

n yo

u ec

onom

ical

ly?

num

ber

of

pers

ons

------

------

------

---o

f the

se p

erso

ns:

how

man

y ar

e un

der

14 y

ears

old

?---

------

------

------

how

man

y ar

e 14

yea

rs o

ld o

r ol

der?

------

------

------

---


k) I

n w

hat

prod

uctio

n ac

tivit

y(ie

s) d

o yo

u en

gage

mai

nly?

1

(I

nter

view

er: W

hate

ver

the

activ

ity(ie

s) th

e pr

oduc

er e

ngag

es in

, als

o as

k th

e qu

estio

n in

the

follo

win

g su

bsec

tion

l).

agr

icul

ture

____

___

fore

stry

and

/or

gath

erin

g5__

____

_

Live

stoc

k

aqu

acul

ture

2

____

___

____

___

non

-agr

icul

tura

l rur

al a

ctiv

ities

6 :

gro

cerie

s__

____

_

fish

ing3

____

___

bak

ery

____

___

Pro

cess

ing

of p

rimar

y pr

oduc

ts4

__

____

_

to

rtill

a m

aker

____

___

oth

er__

____

_

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e th

ree

mai

n ac

tiviti

es a

ccor

ding

to th

eir

impo

rtan

ce fo

r in

com

e ge

nera

tion

in th

e ag

ricul

tura

l yea

r 20

10.

the

agri

cult

ural

yea

r 20

10 is

the

perio

d fr

om a

pril

2010

to m

arch

201

1.2

/ if t

he in

terv

iew

ee o

nLy

eng

ages

in a

quac

ultu

re, a

pply

que

stio

n l,

1,2

and

skip

to q

uest

ion

45.

3/ i

f the

inte

rvie

wee

on

Ly e

ngag

es in

fish

ing,

ski

p to

que

stio

n l a

nd th

en to

que

stio

n 5

3.4

/ if t

he in

terv

iew

ee o

nLy

eng

ages

in th

e pr

oces

sing

of p

rodu

cts,

ski

p to

que

stio

n l a

nd th

en to

que

stio

n 61

.5

/ if t

he in

terv

iew

ee o

nLy

eng

ages

in fo

rest

ry a

nd/o

r ga

ther

ing,

ask

que

stio

n l,

1,2

and

skip

to q

uest

ion

71.

6/ i

f the

inte

rvie

wee

on

Ly e

ngag

es in

non

-agr

icul

tura

l rur

al a

ctiv

ities

, ski

p to

que

stio

n 74

.

l) D

o yo

u be

long

to

any

econ

omic

org

aniz

atio

n of

pro

duce

rs?

n

o. o

fm

embe

rs

no

(indi

vidu

al p

rodu

cer)

: (0)

yes,

but

car

ries

out h

is/h

er p

rodu

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es in

divi

dual

ly:

yes,

and

car

ries

out h

is/h

er p

rodu

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es c

olle

ctiv

ely

with

the

othe

r pa

rtne

rs (a

s if

a si

ngle

reU

1 ): 1

/ reU

: rur

al e

cono

mic

Uni

t.

Inte

rvie

wer

: If

the

inte

rvie

wee

bel

ongs

to

an e

cono

mic

org

aniz

atio

n of

pro

duce

rs, co

rrec

tly id

entif

y th

e R

Eu a

nd a

sk t

he f

ollo

win

g qu

estio

ns o

f th

e qu

estio

nnai

re r

egar

ding

tha

t R

Eu.


56

II. R

ural

eco

nom

ic u

nit

2.1

Land

tenu

re a

nd s

ourc

e of

moi

stur

e

1. o

f th

e to

tal l

and

area

tha

t yo

u us

e in

you

r pr

oduc

tion

unit

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea…

Uni

t of m

easu

rem

ent1

1.is

you

rs?

____

____

____

____

____

___

2.is

ren

ted,

sha

recr

oppe

d, lo

aned

or

owne

d in

ano

ther

form

?__

____

____

____

____

____

_

1

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.

2. o

f th

e to

tal l

and…

that

you

ow

n, h

ow

muc

h la

nd a

rea

is…

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t11

that

is r

ente

d, s

hare

crop

ped

or o

wne

d in

ano

ther

form

, how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

is…

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t1

1.irr

igat

ed?

2.ra

in-f

ed?

3.of

res

idua

l moi

stur

e?

4.hi

ll or

mou

ntai

n pa

stur

e?

5.gr

eenh

ouse

2?

6.fo

rest

?

7.an

othe

r ty

pe?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.2

/ thi

s ca

tego

ry s

houl

d in

clud

e gr

eenh

ouse

s, n

urse

ries,

sha

de c

over

(sh

adin

g la

ttic

e), m

acro

-tun

nels

, an

d ot

her

agric

ultu

ral s

yste

ms

unde

r w

eath

er c

ontr

ol. i

f on

Ly th

is o

ptio

n w

as s

elec

ted,

ski

p to

que

stio

n 3

and

then

to q

uest

ion

11.

Inte

rvie

wer

: If

the

inte

rvie

wee

eng

ages

in a

gric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n, s

kip

to q

uest

ion

3; if

he/

she

enga

ges

in li

vest

ock

prod

uctio

n sk

ip t

o qu

estio

n 18

.

2.2

agr

icul

tura

l act

iviti

es

3. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

as a

res

ult

of y

our

agric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ities

, yo

u pr

oduc

ed…

onl

y pr

imar

y pr

oduc

ts (w

ithou

t tra

nsfo

rmin

g or

pro

cess

ing)

?P

rimar

y pr

oduc

ts a

nd tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

?1

1/ i

n th

is c

ase

appl

y th

e qu

estio

n of

this

sec

tion

(2.2

) an

d se

ctio

n 2.

6 tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

.


2.2.

1 a

nnua

l cro

ps

4. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

did

you

grow

any

cro

p th

at la

sts

less

tha

n on

e ye

ar?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

if

no,

ski

p to

que

stio

n 7.

5. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

in y

our

agric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ity…

wha

t cr

ops

did

you

grow

, be

ginn

ing

with

the

m

ain

one?

1

Cod

e2

the

crop

s w

ere

of

the

cycl

e…w

ere

they

in

com

pani

on

plan

ting?

3

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

did

you

plan

t?

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

was

mec

hani

zed?

how

muc

h w

as the

tota

l pro

duct

ion?

of y

our t

otal

pro

duct

ion5 …

at w

hat p

rice

did

you

sell

your

ha

rves

t…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent7 )

of y

our s

ubpr

oduc

ts, b

ypro

duct

s an

d/or

stu

bble

…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u co

nsum

e pe

rson

ally

ss?

fw

?a

mou

ntU

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent4

am

ount

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t4a

mou

ntU

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent4

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?fo

r the

fa

mily

(fo

od)?

6

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?

how

m

uch

did

you

sell?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t4

at w

hat p

rice?

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent)

1. 2. 3. 4 5.

1/ i

f the

inte

rvie

wee

gro

ws

crop

s in

com

pani

on p

lant

ing

(on

the

sam

e la

nd)

reco

rd o

n se

para

te li

nes

the

info

rmat

ion

for

each

cro

p.th

e pr

inci

pal c

rop

refe

rs to

the

one

that

gen

erat

es th

e gr

eate

st in

com

e fo

r hi

m/h

er in

his

/her

uni

t of p

rodu

ctio

n.2

/ see

cro

ps t

able

.3

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

in th

e ca

se o

f cro

ps g

row

n in

com

pani

on p

lant

ing.

4/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

5/ i

n th

ese

colu

mns

the

info

rmat

ion

shou

ld b

e re

cord

ed u

sing

the

sam

e un

it of

mea

sure

men

t as

used

for

the

tota

l pro

duct

ion

(pre

viou

s co

lum

n); i

f app

licab

le, t

he c

orre

spon

ding

con

vers

ion

shou

ld b

e m

ade.

6/ i

f he/

she

has

not s

old

his/

her

prod

uctio

n an

d it

has

been

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in

the

loca

lity

or r

egio

n of

the

prod

uct p

laci

ng it

in th

e sp

ace

corr

espo

ndin

g to

pric

e in

the

coun

try.

7/ U

se th

e sa

me

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent r

ecor

ded

in to

tal p

rodu

ctio

n.


58

6. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

wha

t w

ere

the

cost

s of

pro

duct

ion

of y

our

crop

s?1

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

as

in q

uest

ion

5)

Cro

p2C

ode3

If y

ou r

ente

d la

nd t

o pr

oduc

e…In

the

pre

para

tion

of

the

land

, ho

w m

any

hect

ares

…In

the

pla

ntin

g…

how

man

y he

ctar

es

did

you

rent

?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y pe

r he

ctar

e?

wer

e de

ep

tille

d?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wer

e lig

htly

pl

owed

?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wer

e pl

owed

?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wer

e le

vele

d?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

per

he

ctar

e?

how

muc

h se

ed4

did

you

use

per

hect

are?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

wha

t was

the

pric

e of

the

seed

per

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

yo

u to

pla

nt

(exc

ludi

ng

the

seed

) pe

r he

ctar

e?6

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Que

stio

n 6

con

tinue

d… (I

nter

view

er:

Kee

p th

e sa

me

orde

r of

cro

ps)

Cro

p C

ode3

If y

ou a

pplie

d fe

rtili

zers

…If

you

did

cro

p ca

re o

pera

tion

s (h

oein

g, w

eedi

ng,

hilli

ng o

r ot

hers

)…

on h

ow m

any

hect

ares

did

yo

u ap

ply

it?

how

muc

h fe

rtili

zer

did

you

use

per

hect

are?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

how

muc

h di

d th

e fe

rtili

zer

cost

yo

u pe

r un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent?

how

muc

h di

d th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

fert

ilize

rs

cost

you

per

hec

tare

?

on h

ow m

any

hect

ares

did

you

w

ork?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

yo

u pe

r he

ctar

e?ho

w m

any

times

did

yo

u do

it?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.


Que

stio

n 6

con

tinue

d… (I

nter

view

er:

Kee

p th

e sa

me

orde

r of

cro

ps)

Cro

p C

ode3

If y

ou d

id w

eed

cont

rol…

If y

ou d

id p

est

and/

or d

isea

se c

ontr

ol…

che

mic

al c

ontr

ol:

man

ual c

ontr

ol:

on h

ow

man

y he

ctar

es d

id

you

appl

y pe

stic

ides

an

d/or

fu

ngic

ides

?

wha

t am

ount

of

pest

icid

es

and/

or

fung

icid

es

did

you

use

per

hect

are?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

how

muc

h di

d th

e pr

oduc

ts

appl

ied

cost

pe

r un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent?

how

muc

h di

d th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

prod

ucts

co

st p

er

hect

are?

on h

ow

man

y he

ctar

es d

id

you

appl

y he

rbic

ides

?

wha

t am

ount

of

herb

icid

e di

d yo

u us

e pe

r he

ctar

e?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

how

muc

h di

d th

e he

rbic

ide

cost

you

pe

r un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent?

how

muc

h di

d th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

prod

uct

cost

you

per

he

ctar

e?

on h

ow

man

y he

ctar

es

did

you

do

man

ual

cont

rol?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st

you

per

hect

are?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Que

stio

n 6

con

tinue

d… (I

nter

view

er:

Kee

p th

e sa

me

orde

r of

cro

ps)

Cro

pC

ode3

If y

ou a

pplie

d ir

riga

tion

…

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

did

you

irrig

ate?

if yo

u ho

ld7

the

right

s fo

r th

e us

e of

wat

er …

if yo

u ar

e no

t the

hol

der

of th

e w

ater

use

rig

hts,

ho

w m

uch

did

it co

st

you

to ir

rigat

e?

on

how

man

y he

ctar

es d

id y

ou a

pply

som

e of

the

follo

win

g ty

pes

of ir

rigat

ion?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r th

e us

e of

ele

ctric

ity fo

r irr

igat

ion?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

yo

u to

irrig

ate

your

cr

ops

(use

rig

hts,

la

bor

or o

ther

s)?

ear

then

ca

nals

Line

d ca

nals

can

nons

sprin

kler

sy

stem

mic

ro-s

prin

kler

sy

stem

drip

sy

stem

oth

er

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.


60

Que

stio

n 6

con

clud

ed…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

Cro

pC

ode3

In t

he h

arve

st …

how

muc

h w

as t

he c

ost

of …

oth

er c

osts

how

man

y he

ctar

es

did

you

harv

est?

wha

t was

the

cost

of

har

vest

per

he

ctar

e?

rent

of i

nfra

stru

ctur

e an

d/or

faci

litie

s?

depr

ecia

tion

of

infr

astr

uctu

re a

nd/o

r fa

cilit

ies?

8

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y in

tota

l for

shi

ppin

g?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r ex

pens

es o

ther

than

thos

e m

entio

ned?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ if t

he in

terv

iew

ee g

row

s cr

ops

in c

ompa

nion

pla

ntin

g, r

ecor

d th

e co

mm

on c

osts

onl

y on

the

line

corr

espo

ndin

g to

the

mai

n cr

op; a

nd in

the

case

of d

iffer

entia

ted

cost

s (s

uch

as s

eed,

pes

t and

/or

dise

ase

cont

rol,

harv

est o

r ot

hers

) th

ese

mus

t be

reco

rded

in th

e co

rres

pond

ing

crop

.3

/ see

cro

ps t

able

.4

/ ref

ers

to p

lant

mat

eria

l use

d to

initi

ate

a cr

op.

5/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

6/ i

nclu

des,

if a

pplic

able

, the

cos

t of r

owin

g an

d pa

ddin

g.7/

ref

ers

to h

oldi

ng a

wat

er c

once

ssio

n rig

ht is

sued

by

the

gove

rnm

ent.

8/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.

2.2.

2 P

eren

nial

cro

ps

7. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

in y

our

prod

uctio

n un

it di

d yo

u ha

ve p

astu

res,

pla

ntat

ions

, fr

uit

tree

s or

oth

er t

ypes

of

crop

s w

ith a

cyc

le

grea

ter

than

one

yea

r?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

if n

o, s

kip

to q

uest

ion

11.


8. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

in y

our

agric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ity…

wha

t ty

pe o

f fr

uit

tree

s,

past

ure

and/

or p

lant

atio

ns

do y

ou h

ave,

st

arti

ng w

ith

the

mai

n on

e?1

Cod

e2

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

do

you

have

pla

nted

?

how

muc

h do

you

es

tim

ate

is

the

valu

e of

you

r pl

anta

tion

s (e

xclu

ding

th

e la

nd)?

(loca

l cu

rren

cy)

how

muc

h la

nd

area

do

you

have

in

prod

ucti

on?

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

is

mec

hani

zed?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u ha

rves

t in

the

201

0

agri

cult

ural

yea

r?

wha

t qu

anti

ty d

id

you

sell

in t

he

201

0 a

gric

ultu

ral

year

4 …

wha

t qu

anti

ty d

id

you

use

for

self-

cons

umpt

ion4

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

201

0 a

gric

ultu

ral

year

…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of

mea

sure

men

t)

am

ount

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3a

mou

ntU

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent3

am

ount

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3a

mou

ntU

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent3

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?fo

r th

e fa

mily

(f

ood)

?5

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?

1. 2. 3.

1/ t

he m

ain

crop

ref

ers

to th

e on

e th

at g

ener

ates

the

grea

test

inco

me

in h

is/h

er u

nit o

f pro

duct

ion.

2/ s

ee c

rops

tab

le.

3/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

4/ i

n th

ese

colu

mns

the

info

rmat

ion

shou

ld b

e re

cord

ed u

sing

the

sam

e un

it of

mea

sure

men

t tha

t was

us

ed to

rec

ord

the

volu

me

harv

este

d; if

app

licab

le, t

he c

orre

spon

ding

con

vers

ion

shou

ld b

e m

ade.

5/ i

f he/

she

did

not s

ell h

is/h

er p

rodu

ctio

n an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n as

k th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t, pl

acin

g it

in th

e sp

ace

corr

espo

ndin

g to

pric

e in

the

coun

try.

9. I

n th

e 20

10 a

gric

ultu

ral y

ear,

or in

prio

r ye

ars,

wha

t w

ere

the

cost

s of

est

ablis

hing

or

buyi

ng y

our

plan

tatio

ns?

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e cr

op o

rder

as

in q

uest

ion

8)1

9.1

If

any

pla

ntat

ion

was

est

ablis

hed…

Cro

pC

ode2

how

m

uch

land

are

a di

d yo

u pl

ant?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent3

in

wha

t ye

ar

did

you

plan

t it

?

In t

he p

repa

rati

on o

f th

e la

nd,

how

man

y he

ctar

es …

for

plan

ting

…

oth

er c

osts

as

soci

ated

w

ith

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of

the

pl

anta

tion

did

you

clea

n or

de

fore

st?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wer

e lig

ht

plow

ed?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wer

e pl

owed

?

how

m

uch

did

it co

st p

er

hect

are?

wha

t qu

antit

y of

see

ds

did

you

use

per

hect

are?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3

wha

t w

as

the

pric

e of

the

seed

?

how

man

y pl

ants

di

d yo

u pl

ant p

er

hect

are?

wha

t w

as

the

pric

e pe

r pl

ant?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

to p

lant

pe

r he

ctar

e (e

xclu

ding

the

seed

or

plan

ts)?

(inst

alla

tion

of

win

dbre

aker

ba

rrie

rs,

prot

ectio

n fe

nces

, am

ong

othe

rs).

1. 2. 3.


62

9.2

If

you

bou

ght

a pl

anta

tion…

Cro

pC

ode2

in w

hat

year

di

d yo

u bu

y it

?

how

muc

h la

nd

area

did

you

buy

?u

nit

of

mea

sure

men

t3

how

old

was

the

pl

anta

tion

?(y

ears

)

how

muc

h di

d it

co

st?

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.

2/ s

ee c

rops

tab

le.

3/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

10.

In t

he 2

010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r, w

hat

wer

e th

e pr

oduc

tion

cost

s of

you

r cr

ops?

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

as

in q

uest

ion

8)1

Cro

p C

ode2

If y

ou a

pplie

d fe

rtili

zers

…P

runi

ng

on h

ow m

any

hect

ares

wer

e th

ey a

pplie

d?

wha

t qua

ntity

of

fert

ilize

r di

d yo

u us

e pe

r he

ctar

e?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3

how

muc

h di

d th

e fe

rtili

zer

cost

per

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

to a

pply

th

e fe

rtili

zers

per

he

ctar

e?

on

how

man

y he

ctar

es

was

it d

one?

how

man

y pr

unin

gs

wer

e do

ne?

how

muc

h di

d ea

ch

prun

ing

done

cos

t?4

1. 2. 3.


Que

stio

n 10

con

tinue

d…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

Cro

p C

ode2

If w

eed

cont

rol w

as d

one

…If

pes

t an

d/or

dis

ease

con

trol

was

don

e …

che

mic

al c

ontr

ol:

man

ual c

ontr

ol:

on h

ow

man

y he

ctar

es

wer

e pe

stic

ides

an

d/or

fu

ngic

ides

ap

plie

d?

wha

t am

ount

of

pes

ticid

es

and/

or

fung

icid

es

was

use

d pe

r he

ctar

e?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3

how

muc

h di

d th

e pr

oduc

t cos

t pe

r un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent?

how

muc

h di

d th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

prod

ucts

co

st p

er

hect

are?

on h

ow m

any

hect

ares

wer

e he

rbic

ides

ap

plie

d?

how

muc

h he

rbic

ide

was

us

ed p

er

hect

are?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3

how

muc

h di

d th

e he

rbic

ide

cost

pe

r un

it of

m

easu

rem

ent?

how

muc

h di

d th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

herb

icid

e co

st

per

hect

are?

on h

ow m

any

hect

ares

was

th

e co

ntro

l ca

rrie

d ou

t?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

per

he

ctar

e?

1. 2. 3. Que

stio

n 10

con

tinue

d…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

Cro

pC

ode2

If ir

riga

tion

was

app

lied

…

how

muc

h la

nd w

as

irrig

ated

?

if ho

lder

5 of

the

wat

er u

se r

ight

s …

if no

t hol

der

of th

e w

ater

use

rig

hts,

how

m

uch

did

it co

st to

irr

igat

e?

on

how

man

y he

ctar

es w

ere

any

of th

e fo

llow

ing

type

s of

irrig

atio

n ap

plie

d?

how

muc

h w

as

paid

for

the

use

of e

lect

ricity

for

irrig

atio

n?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

to ir

rigat

e (u

se

right

s, la

bor

or

othe

r co

sts)

?

ear

then

ca

nals

Line

d ca

nals

can

nons

sprin

kler

sy

stem

mic

ro-s

prin

kler

sy

stem

drip

sy

stem

oth

er

1. 2. 3.


64

Que

stio

n 10

con

clud

ed…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

cro

pc

ode2

in th

e ha

rves

t…h

ow m

uch

was

the

cost

for

the

conc

ept o

f…o

ther

cos

ts

how

man

y he

ctar

es d

id

you

harv

est?

wha

t was

the

cost

of h

arve

st

per

hect

are?

rent

of i

nfra

stru

ctur

e an

d/or

faci

litie

s?

depr

ecia

tion

of

infr

astr

uctu

re a

nd/o

r fa

cilit

ies?

6

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y in

tota

l fo

r sh

ippi

ng?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r ex

pens

es o

ther

than

th

ose

men

tione

d?

1. 2. 3.

1/ e

xpre

ss th

e co

sts

in lo

cal c

urre

ncy.

2/ s

ee c

rops

tab

le.

3/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

4/ i

ndic

ate

the

cost

of t

he p

runi

ng fo

r th

e w

hole

land

are

a on

whi

ch it

was

don

e.5

/ ref

ers

to h

oldi

ng a

con

cess

ion

title

for

wat

er is

sued

by

the

gove

rnm

ent.

6/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.

2.2.

3 c

rops

gro

wn

in g

reen

hous

es1

1/

incl

ude

unde

r th

is c

ateg

ory

gree

nhou

ses,

nur

serie

s, s

hade

cov

er (

shad

ing

latt

ice)

, mac

ro-t

unne

ls a

nd o

ther

agr

icul

ture

sys

tem

s un

der

wea

ther

con

trol

.

11.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r un

it of

pro

duct

ion

did

you

plan

t cr

ops

in a

gre

enho

use?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

if

no,

go

to q

uest

ion

14.


12.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r ag

ricul

tura

l act

ivity…

wha

t cr

ops

did

you

grow

in a

gr

eenh

ouse

?1C

ode2

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

did

you

plan

t?

wha

t w

as t

he t

otal

pr

oduc

tion

for

the

indi

cate

d pe

riod

?

of

the

prod

ucti

on o

btai

ned,

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

indi

cate

d pe

riod

…at

wha

t av

erag

e pr

ice

did

you

sell

it …

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

am

ount

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t3a

mou

ntU

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent3

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3.

1/ i

f in

the

perio

d in

dica

ted

the

sam

e cr

op w

as p

lant

ed m

ore

than

onc

e, th

e in

form

atio

n on

ea

ch c

rop

shou

ld b

e re

gist

ered

on

diff

eren

t lin

es fo

r ea

ch o

ne p

lant

ed.

2/ s

ee c

rops

tab

le.

3/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

13.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

of p

rodu

ctio

n of

the

cro

ps g

row

n in

gre

enho

uses

?

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

as

ques

tion

12)1

Cro

pC

ode2

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r th

e pr

epar

atio

n of

th

e la

nd o

r su

bstr

atum

in

the

indi

cate

d pe

riod

?3

for

plan

ting

…o

ther

cos

ts a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

plan

ting

wha

t was

the

amou

nt o

f se

eds

used

?4

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5w

hat w

as th

e pr

ice

of s

eed?

how

man

y se

edlin

gs w

ere

plan

ted?

4

wha

t was

th

e pr

ice

per

seed

ling?

wha

t was

the

tota

l cos

t of

plan

ting

(exc

ludi

ng s

eed

or

seed

ling)

?

(roo

ting

and

othe

r in

puts

or

mat

eria

ls)

1. 2. 3.


66

Que

stio

n 13

con

tinue

d…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

Cro

p C

ode2

In t

he a

pplic

atio

n of

fer

tiliz

ers

…

In c

rop

prac

tice

s (p

runi

ng,

plan

t su

ppor

ting

, cl

earing

, lig

ht p

runi

ng,

clea

ning

or

othe

rs)

…

If p

est

and/

or d

isea

se c

ontr

ol w

as d

one

…

how

muc

h fe

rtili

zer

did

you

use?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

how

muc

h di

d th

e fe

rtili

zer

cost

per

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

to

app

ly th

e fe

rtili

zers

?

how

muc

h di

d it

cost

?

how

man

y cr

op

prac

tices

wer

e do

ne?

how

man

y ap

plic

atio

ns

wer

e do

ne?

how

muc

h pe

stic

ide

and/

or fu

ngic

ide

was

use

d pe

r ap

plic

atio

n?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

how

muc

h di

d th

e pr

oduc

t us

ed c

ost

per

unit

of

mea

sure

men

t?

how

muc

h di

d ea

ch

appl

icat

ion

cost

?

1. 2. 3. Que

stio

n 13

con

clud

ed…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of c

rops

)

Cro

pC

ode2

In ir

riga

tion

…In

har

vest

…h

ow m

uch

did

it c

ost

for

…o

ther

cos

ts …

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r th

e co

nsum

ptio

n of

ele

ctric

ity

for

irrig

atio

n?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

mat

eria

ls

used

for

irrig

atio

n?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

wat

er?

the

irrig

atio

n sy

stem

ut

ilize

d w

as…

6ho

w m

uch

land

are

a di

d yo

u ha

rves

t?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t5

wha

t was

the

tota

l cos

t of

harv

estin

g?7

rent

of

infr

astr

uctu

re

and/

or

faci

litie

s?

depr

ecia

tion

of

infr

astr

uctu

re

and/

or

faci

litie

s?8

how

m

uch

did

you

pay

in to

tal f

or

ship

ping

?

how

muc

h di

d yo

u pa

y fo

r ex

pens

es

othe

r th

an

thos

e m

entio

ned?

man

ual?

tech

nifie

d?

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

cro

ps t

able

.3

/ all

inpu

ts a

nd a

ctiv

ities

nec

essa

ry to

hav

e th

e la

nd in

ade

quat

e co

nditi

on fo

r pl

antin

g sh

ould

be

incl

uded

.4

/ rec

ord

the

tota

l am

ount

use

d in

gre

enho

uses

.5

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.6

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

. in

case

bot

h sy

stem

s ar

e us

ed in

dica

te o

nly

the

one

with

whi

ch th

e gr

eate

st la

nd a

rea

is ir

rigat

ed.

7/ in

clud

es m

ater

ials

, equ

ipm

ent,

labo

r or

oth

ers.

8/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.


2.2.

4 c

ompl

emen

tary

que

stio

ns o

n ag

ricul

tura

l act

iviti

es

14.

In

the

2010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r, di

d yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n ha

ve a

ny c

ertif

icat

ion1 …

1. fo

r or

gani

c cr

ops?

2. fo

r he

alth

?

3. fo

r sa

fety

?

4. fo

r en

viro

nmen

tal s

ervi

ces?

5. fo

r so

me

othe

r ty

pe?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e ty

pe o

f cer

tific

atio

n it

had,

if a

pplic

able

.

15.

In t

he 2

010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r, w

hat

perc

enta

ge o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n w

as c

ertif

ied?

Cro

pC

ode1

Per

cent

age

of p

rodu

ct c

erti

fied

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee c

rops

tab

le.

16.

In t

he 2

010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r, in

you

r ag

ricul

tura

l act

ivity…

how

man

y fa

mily

mem

bers

he

lped

you

?1ho

w m

any

hour

s pe

r da

y on

ave

rage

did

th

ey h

elp

you?

during

how

man

y da

ys

on a

vera

ge d

id t

hey

help

yo

u?

num

ber

of f

amily

day

's

wor

k us

ed2

how

muc

h do

es a

day

’s w

ork

cost

in t

he

loca

lity

or r

egio

n?

1/ i

nclu

des

the

prod

ucer

, if a

pplic

able

.2

/ Int

ervi

ewer

: in

this

col

umn

the

resu

lt of

mul

tiply

ing

the

thre

e pr

evio

us c

olum

ns a

nd d

ivid

ing

by 8

sho

uld

be r

ecor

ded.

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o a

wor

king

day

whi

ch n

orm

ally

is 8

hou

rs.

Fam

ily d

ay’s

wor

k re

fers

to la

bor

prov

ided

by

fam

ily m

embe

rs th

at h

elpe

d on

the

farm

with

out r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n.


68

17.

In t

he 2

010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r…

did

you

rece

ive

a su

bsid

y fo

r di

esel

?1fo

r ho

w m

any

liter

s di

d yo

u re

ceiv

e th

e su

bsid

y?w

hat

was

the

tot

al a

mou

nt o

f lit

ers

used

for

you

r ag

ricu

ltur

al a

ctiv

itie

s?

1

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

if af

firm

ativ

e.

Inte

rvie

wer

: R

ecor

d th

e pr

ice

per

liter

of

dies

el o

n th

e da

te o

f fil

ling

out

the

ques

tionn

aire

:___

____

___

loca

l cur

renc

y.

2.3

Live

stoc

k ac

tiviti

es

18.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, a

s a

resu

lt of

you

r liv

esto

ck a

ctiv

ity,

you

pro

duce

d…

only

prim

ary

prod

ucts

(with

out t

rans

form

atio

n or

pro

cess

ing)

?pr

imar

y pr

oduc

ts a

nd p

rodu

cts

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d?1

1

/ app

ly th

e qu

estio

ns o

f thi

s se

ctio

n (2

.3)

and

sect

ion

2.6

Pro

duct

s tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed.

19.

In y

our

unit

of p

rodu

ctio

n, d

o yo

u ha

ve1 …

1.ca

ttle

?2

2.pi

gs?3

3.he

ns a

nd c

hick

ens?

4

4.sh

eep?

5

5.go

ats?

6

6.be

es?7

7.ot

her

anim

al s

peci

es?8

1/ m

ark

with

an

x on

ly th

e th

ree

spec

ies

that

gen

erat

e m

ost o

f the

inco

me

for

the

inte

rvie

wee

and

app

ly th

e qu

estio

nnai

re o

nly

for

thos

e sp

ecie

s.2

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 20

.3

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 23

.4

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 26

.5

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 2

9.6

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 32

.7/

ski

p to

que

stio

n 35

.8

/ ski

p to

que

stio

n 3

8.


2.3.

1 c

attle

20.

of

the

catt

le y

ou h

ave…

how

man

y ar

e …

1w

hat

is t

he e

stim

ated

tot

al v

alue

?2

1.fo

r be

ef p

rodu

ctio

n?

2.co

ws

for

milk

pro

duct

ion?

3.do

uble

pur

pose

cow

s?

4.co

ws

for

seed

sto

ck?

5.ca

lves

?

6.br

eedi

ng m

ales

?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

num

ber

of a

nim

als.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.

21.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

how

muc

h w

as s

old

in t

he

coun

try?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h w

as s

old

abro

ad?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h w

as u

sed

for

self-

cons

umpt

ion

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily (

food

)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

ani

mal

s fo

r m

eat?

2.of

cal

ves?

3.of

fina

lized

ani

mal

s?

4.of

cul

led

anim

als?

5.of

milk

?

6.of

bre

edin

g st

ock

anim

als?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d w

as u

sed

for

fam

ily c

onsu

mpt

ion,

ask

the

pric

e in

the

loca

lity

or r

egio

n of

the

prod

uct

and

plac

e it

in th

e sp

ace

corr

espo

ndin

g to

pric

e in

the

coun

try.


70

22.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

in t

he p

rodu

ctio

n of

cat

tle f

or1 …

feed

?2he

alth

?3ar

tifi

cial

inse

min

atio

n an

d/or

mat

ing?

cons

umpt

ion

of

elec

tric

ity?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4 o

ther

con

cept

s?5

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s gr

azin

g, c

ut fo

dder

, bal

ance

d fe

ed, a

nd fe

ed s

uppl

emen

ts, a

mon

g ot

hers

, tha

t hav

e be

en p

urch

ased

. su

bseq

uent

ly, i

f app

licab

le, t

he in

terv

iew

er s

houl

d ad

d to

this

item

the

cost

of p

rodu

ctio

n of

the

feed

pro

duce

d by

the

prod

ucer

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

. 3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes

and

paym

ent o

f vet

erin

ary

serv

ices

, am

ong

othe

rs.

4/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

5/ o

ther

exp

ense

s su

ch a

s sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.

2.3.

2 P

igs

23.

of

the

pigs

you

hav

e…

how

man

y ar

e …

1w

hat d

o yo

u es

timat

e is

thei

r to

tal v

alue

?2

1.fe

mal

e re

prod

ucer

s?

2.fa

tten

ing

pigs

?

3.br

eedi

ng s

tock

?

4.ho

gs?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

num

ber

of a

nim

als.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.


24.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

how

muc

h w

as

sold

in t

he

coun

try

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h w

as

sold

abr

oad

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

wha

t am

ount

was

use

d fo

r se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

nu

nit

of

mea

sure

men

t1

at w

as p

rice

did

you

sel

l…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily

(foo

d)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

mea

t ani

mal

s?

2.of

fina

lized

pig

s?

3.of

cul

led

anim

als?

4.of

wea

ning

pig

s?

5.of

bre

edin

g st

ock?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

sel

f-co

nsum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t and

pla

ce it

in th

e sp

ace

corr

espo

ndin

g to

pric

e in

the

coun

try.

25.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

in t

he p

rodu

ctio

n of

pig

s fo

r1 …

feed

?2he

alth

3ar

tifi

cial

in

sem

inat

ion

or

coup

ling?

cons

umpt

ion

of

wat

er?

cons

umpt

ion

of

elec

tric

ity?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4ot

her

conc

epts

?5

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s ba

lanc

ed fe

ed, f

eed

supp

lem

ents

, am

ong

othe

rs, t

hat h

ad b

een

boug

ht. s

ubse

quen

tly,

if ap

plic

able

, the

inte

rvie

wer

sho

uld

add

to th

is it

em th

e co

st o

f pro

duct

ion

of th

e fe

ed p

rodu

ced

by

the

prod

ucer

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

. 3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes,

and

pay

men

t of v

eter

inar

ian

serv

ices

, am

ong

othe

rs.

4/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.5

/ exp

ense

s su

ch a

s sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.


72

2.3.

3 h

ens

and

chic

kens

26.

of

the

hens

and

chi

cken

s yo

u ha

ve…

how

man

y ar

e …

1w

hat

is t

he e

stim

ated

tot

al v

alue

?2

1.la

ying

hen

s?

2.br

eedi

ng h

ens?

3.m

eat c

hick

ens?

4.ch

icks

?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

num

ber

of a

nim

als.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.

27.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, f

rom

you

r pr

oduc

tion…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll on

ave

rage

m

onth

ly in

the

co

untr

y

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll on

ave

rage

m

onth

ly a

broa

d

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h w

as u

sed

during

the

ye

ar f

or s

elf-

cons

umpt

ion

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily

(foo

d)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

mea

t chi

cken

s?

2.of

egg

s?

3.of

oth

er p

rodu

cts?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t and

pla

ce it

in th

e sp

ace

for

pric

e in

the

coun

try.


28.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

in t

he p

rodu

ctio

n of

hen

s an

d ch

icke

ns f

or1 …

feed

?2he

alth

?3re

prod

ucti

on?

wat

er

cons

umpt

ion?

elec

tric

ity

cons

umpt

ion?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4ot

her

conc

epts

?5

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s ba

lanc

ed fe

ed, f

eed

supp

lem

ents

, am

ong

othe

rs, t

hat h

ave

been

bou

ght.

subs

eque

ntly

, if

appl

icab

le, t

he in

terv

iew

er s

houl

d ad

d to

this

item

the

cost

of p

rodu

ctio

n of

the

feed

pro

duce

d by

the

prod

ucer

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

. 3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes,

and

pay

men

t of v

eter

inar

y se

rvic

es, a

mon

g ot

hers

.4

/ the

dep

reci

atio

n va

lue

will

be

obta

ined

from

the

data

that

is r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

5/ e

xpen

ses

such

as

ship

ping

, par

ts, e

tc.

2.3.

4 sh

eep

29.

of

the

shee

p yo

u ha

ve…

how

man

y ar

e1w

hat

is t

he e

stim

ated

tot

al v

alue

?2

1.fe

mal

e re

prod

ucer

s?

2.fa

tten

ing

shee

p?

3.br

eedi

ng s

tock

?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

num

ber

of a

nim

als.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.


74

30.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

co

untr

y

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll ab

road

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h w

as u

sed

for

self-

cons

umpt

ion

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily

(foo

d)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

ani

mal

s fo

r m

eat?

2.of

fina

lized

ani

mal

s?

3.of

cul

led

anim

als?

4.of

woo

l?

5.of

bre

edin

g st

ock?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t and

pla

ce it

in th

e sp

ace

for

pric

e in

the

coun

try.

31.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

in t

he p

rodu

ctio

n of

she

ep f

or1 …

feed

?2he

alth

?3ar

tifi

cial

inse

min

atio

n or

mat

ing?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4ot

her

conc

epts

?5 1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s gr

azin

g, c

ut fo

dder

, bal

ance

d fe

ed, a

nd fe

ed s

uppl

emen

ts, a

mon

g ot

hers

, tha

t hav

e be

en p

urch

ased

. sub

sequ

ently

, if a

pplic

able

, the

inte

rvie

wer

sho

uld

add

to th

is it

em th

e co

st o

f pr

oduc

tion

of fe

ed p

rodu

ced

by th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf (p

rodu

ctio

n se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

n).

3/ i

nclu

des

the

cost

of m

edic

ines

, vac

cine

s, a

nd p

aym

ent o

f vet

erin

ary

serv

ices

, am

ong

othe

rs.

4/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

5/ e

.g.:

exp

ense

s fo

r sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.


2.3.

5 g

oats

32.

of

the

goat

s yo

u ha

ve…

how

man

y ar

e …

1w

hat

do y

ou e

stim

ate

is t

heir

tot

al v

alue

?2

1.fo

r m

eat p

rodu

ctio

n?

2.m

ilk g

oats

?

3.do

uble

pur

pose

goa

ts?

4.ki

ds?

5.br

eedi

ng m

ales

?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

num

ber

of a

nim

als.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.

33.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

co

untr

y

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll ab

road

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u us

e fo

r se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

nu

nit

of

mea

sure

men

t1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily

(foo

d)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

mea

t ani

mal

s?

2.of

fina

lized

goa

ts?

3.of

kid

s?

4.of

cul

led

anim

als?

5.of

milk

?

6.of

bre

edin

g st

ock?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t an

d pl

ace

it in

the

spac

e fo

r pr

ice

in th

e co

untr

y.


76

34.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e co

sts

in t

he p

rodu

ctio

n of

goa

ts f

or1 …

feed

?2he

alth

?3re

prod

ucti

on?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

the

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

for

othe

r co

ncep

ts?5 1

/ sta

te th

e co

sts

in lo

cal c

urre

ncy.

2/ i

nclu

des

graz

ing,

cut

fodd

er, b

alan

ced

feed

, and

feed

sup

plem

ents

, am

ong

othe

rs, t

hat h

ave

been

pu

rcha

sed.

sub

sequ

ently

, if a

pplic

able

, the

inte

rvie

wer

sho

uld

add

to th

is it

em th

e co

st o

f pro

duct

ion

of

the

feed

pro

duce

d by

the

prod

ucer

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

. 3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes,

and

pay

men

t of v

eter

inar

y se

rvic

es, a

mon

g ot

hers

.4

/ the

dep

reci

atio

n va

lue

will

be

obta

ined

from

the

data

that

are

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.5

/ exp

ense

s su

ch a

s sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.

2.3.

6 b

ees

35.

In y

our

beek

eepi

ng a

ctiv

ity…

how

man

y do

you

hav

e of

…1

wha

t do

you

est

imat

e as

its

tota

l val

ue?2

1.hi

ves

(box

es)?

2.qu

een

bees

?

1/ i

ndic

ate

the

amou

nt.

2/ s

tate

the

valu

e in

loca

l cur

renc

y.


36.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

co

untr

y

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll ab

road

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u us

e fo

r se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

nu

nit

of

mea

sure

men

t1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

for

the

fam

ily

(foo

d)?2

for

prod

uctio

n (in

puts

)?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1.of

hon

ey?

2.of

roy

al je

lly?

3.of

pol

len?

4.of

wax

?

5.of

oth

er p

rodu

cts?

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

re

gion

of t

he p

rodu

ct a

nd p

lace

it in

the

spac

e fo

r pr

ice

in th

e co

untr

y.

37.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

wha

t w

ere

your

cos

ts o

f pr

oduc

tion

for1 …

feed

?2he

alth

?3re

prod

ucti

on?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4ot

her

conc

epts

?5 1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s fe

ed s

uppl

emen

ts, a

mon

g ot

hers

.3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes,

and

pay

men

t of p

rofe

ssio

nal s

ervi

ces,

am

ong

othe

rs.

4/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

5/ e

xpen

ses

such

as

ship

ping

, par

ts, e

tc.


78

2.3.

7 o

ther

ani

mal

spe

cies

1

1/ a

pply

to s

peci

es o

f pro

duct

ion

inte

rest

.

38.

of

the

anim

als

you

have

…

how

man

y ar

e …

2w

hat

do y

ou e

stim

ate

thei

r to

tal v

alue

is?3

1.ho

rses

?

2.m

ules

?

3.bu

rros

?

4.ra

bbits

?

5.fo

wl,

exce

pt h

ens

and

chic

kens

?1

6.ot

her

anim

als?

1/ s

uch

as d

ucks

, gee

se, t

urke

ys, o

stric

hes,

qua

ils, a

nd o

ther

s.2

/ ind

icat

e th

e nu

mbe

r of

ani

mal

s.3

/ sta

te th

e va

lue

in lo

cal c

urre

ncy.

39.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n…

Spe

cies

how

muc

h di

d yo

u se

ll in

the

cou

ntry

?u

nit

of

mea

sure

men

t1ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell

abro

ad?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

how

muc

h di

d yo

u us

e fo

r se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

n?2

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent1

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?

1. 2.

1/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.

2/ i

f the

pro

duct

ion

was

not

sol

d an

d it

was

use

d fo

r fa

mily

con

sum

ptio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

re

gion

of t

he p

rodu

ct a

nd p

lace

it in

the

spac

e fo

r pr

ice

in th

e co

untr

y.


40.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

wha

t w

ere

the

cost

s of

pro

duct

ion

for1 …

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of s

peci

es a

s qu

estio

n 39

)

Spe

cies

feed

?2he

alth

?3re

prod

ucti

on?

othe

r in

puts

?la

bor?

rent

of

equi

pmen

t or

fac

iliti

es?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4ot

her

conc

epts

?5

1. 2.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ inc

lude

s gr

azin

g, c

ut fo

dder

, bal

ance

d fe

ed, a

nd fe

ed s

uppl

emen

ts, a

mon

g ot

hers

, tha

t hav

e be

en p

urch

ased

. sub

sequ

ently

, if a

pplic

able

, the

in

terv

iew

er s

houl

d ad

d to

this

item

the

cost

of p

rodu

ctio

n of

the

feed

pro

duce

d by

the

prod

ucer

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

.3

/ inc

lude

s th

e co

st o

f med

icin

es, v

acci

nes

and

paym

ent o

f vet

erin

ary

serv

ices

, am

ong

othe

rs.

4/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

5/ e

xpen

ses

such

as

ship

ping

, par

ts, e

tc.

2.3.

8 c

ompl

emen

tary

que

stio

ns o

n liv

esto

ck a

ctiv

ities

41.

In t

he p

erio

d fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

r pr

oduc

tion

have

any

cer

tific

atio

n1 …

1.fo

r he

alth

con

ditio

ns?

2.fo

r or

gani

c pr

oduc

tion?

3.fo

r fo

od s

afet

y?

4.fo

r an

y ot

her

type

?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e ty

pe o

f cer

tific

atio

n yo

u ha

d, if

app

licab

le.


80

42.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

perc

enta

ge o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n w

as c

ertif

ied?

Pro

duct

Per

cent

age

of t

he p

rodu

ct c

erti

fied

1.P

ork

2.La

mb

3.c

ow’s

milk

4.eg

gs

5.h

oney

6.o

ther

43.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011…

Did

you

rec

eive

a s

ubsi

dy f

or d

iese

l?1

for

how

man

y lit

ers

did

you

rece

ive

the

subs

idy?

how

man

y lit

ers

in t

otal

did

you

use

for

you

r liv

esto

ck a

ctiv

itie

s?

1

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

if ye

s.

Inte

rvie

wer

: R

ecor

d th

e pr

ice

per

liter

of

dies

el o

n th

e da

te o

f ap

plyi

ng t

he s

urve

y:__

____

____

loca

l cur

renc

y.

44.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

in y

our

lives

tock

act

ivity…

how

man

y fa

mily

mem

bers

hel

ped

you?

1ho

w m

any

hour

s a

day

on a

vera

ge d

id

they

hel

p yo

u?fo

r ho

w m

any

days

on

aver

age

did

they

he

lp y

ou?

num

ber

of f

amily

day

’s w

ork

used

2h

ow m

uch

does

a d

ay’s

wor

k co

st in

th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf w

hen

such

is th

e ca

se.

2/ i

nter

view

er: i

n th

is c

olum

n th

e re

sult

of m

ultip

lyin

g th

e th

ree

prev

ious

col

umns

and

div

idin

g by

8 s

houl

d be

rec

orde

d.a

day

’s w

ork

is e

quiv

alen

t to

a w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

usu

ally

last

s fo

r 8

hour

s.Fa

mily

day

´s w

ork

refe

rs to

thos

e fa

mily

mem

bers

who

hel

ped

him

/her

with

out r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n.


2.4

aqu

acul

ture

act

iviti

es

45.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, a

s a

resu

lt of

you

r aq

uacu

lture

act

ivity,

you

pro

duce

d…

only

prim

ary

prod

ucts

(with

out t

rans

form

atio

n or

pro

cess

ing)

?pr

imar

y pr

oduc

ts a

nd tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

?1

1

/ app

ly th

e qu

estio

ns o

f thi

s se

ctio

n (2

.4)

and

sect

ion

2.6

Tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts.

46.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r aq

uacu

lture

act

ivity…

Aqu

acul

ture

sp

ecie

sC

ode1

how

m

any

M3

of

capa

city

do

you

r po

nds

or c

ages

ha

ve?

how

m

any

anim

als

do y

ou

prod

uce

per

M3

of

wat

er?

how

m

any

juve

nile

s di

d yo

u pr

oduc

e in

eac

h pe

riod

?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

wha

t qu

anti

ty d

id y

ou s

ell o

n av

erag

e m

onth

ly…

At

wha

t av

erag

e pr

ice

did

you

sell…

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

of a

dult

anim

als…

of ju

veni

les…

juve

nile

s…ad

ult a

nim

als…

in th

e co

untr

y?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

abro

ad?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2in

the

coun

try?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2ab

road

?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

in th

e co

untr

y?ab

road

?in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3. 1

/ see

the

aqua

cultu

re a

nd fi

shin

g sp

ecie

s an

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.2

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.

47.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r aq

uacu

lture

act

ivity…

Aqu

acul

ture

spe

cies

Cod

e1ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell

as s

port

fis

hing

?u

nit

of m

easu

rem

ent2

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll yo

ur

spor

t fish

ing

prod

uct?

(loca

l cur

renc

y/U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent)

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee a

quac

ultu

re a

nd fi

shin

g sp

ecie

s an

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.2

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.


82

48.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

hav

e yo

u in

corp

orat

ed g

enet

ical

ly im

prov

ed a

nim

als

into

you

r aq

uacu

lture

uni

t of

pro

duct

ion?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

49.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e yo

ur a

vera

ge m

onth

ly c

osts

for

1 …

Aqu

acul

ture

spe

cies

Cod

e2fe

ed?

heal

th?3

extr

acti

on

(har

vest

) of

sp

ecie

s?4

use

of

wat

er?

cons

umpt

ion

of e

lect

rici

ty?

use

of f

uel?

labo

r?re

nt o

f m

achi

nery

, eq

uipm

ent

and

faci

litie

s?

depr

ecia

tion

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

5

othe

r ac

tivi

ties

and

in

puts

?6

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

aqu

acul

ture

and

fish

ing

spec

ies

and

prod

ucts

tab

le.

3/ i

nclu

des

the

cost

of m

edic

ines

, wat

er a

naly

sis,

spe

cies

ana

lysi

s, a

nd p

aym

ent o

f pro

fess

iona

l ser

vice

s, a

mon

g ot

hers

.4

/ exc

ludi

ng la

bor.

5/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.6

/ exp

ense

s su

ch a

s sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.

50.

In t

he p

erio

d fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

r aq

uacu

lture

pro

duct

ion

have

any

cer

tific

atio

n1 …

2. fo

r he

alth

?

3. fo

r fo

od s

afet

y?

4. fo

r an

othe

r ty

pe?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e ty

pe o

f cer

tific

atio

n it

had,

if a

ny.


51.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

perc

enta

ge o

f yo

ur a

quac

ultu

re p

rodu

ctio

n w

as c

ertif

ied?

Aqu

acul

ture

spe

cies

Cod

e1P

erce

ntag

e of

the

pro

duct

cer

tifi

ed

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee a

quac

ultu

re a

nd fi

shin

g sp

ecie

s ta

ble.

52.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r aq

uacu

lture

act

ivity…

how

man

y fa

mily

m

embe

rs h

elpe

d yo

u?1

how

man

y ho

urs

a da

y on

av

erag

e di

d th

ey h

elp

you?

during

how

man

y da

ys o

n av

erag

e di

d th

ey h

elp

you?

2n

umbe

r of

fam

ily d

ay’s

wor

k us

edh

ow m

uch

does

a d

ay’s

wor

k co

st in

the

lo

calit

y or

reg

ion?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf w

hen

such

is th

e ca

se.

2/ I

nter

view

er: i

n th

is c

olum

n th

e re

sult

of m

ultip

lyin

g th

e th

ree

prev

ious

col

umns

and

div

idin

g by

8 s

houl

d be

rec

orde

d.a

day

’s w

ork

is e

quiv

alen

t to

a w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

usu

ally

last

s fo

r 8

hour

s.Fa

mily

day

’s w

ork

refe

rs to

thos

e fa

mily

mem

bers

who

hel

ped

him

/her

with

out r

ecei

ving

rem

uner

atio

n.

2.5

fish

ing

activ

ities

53.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, a

s a

resu

lt of

you

r fis

hing

act

ivity,

did

you

pro

duce

…

only

prim

ary

prod

ucts

(with

out t

rans

form

atio

n or

pro

cess

ing)

?pr

imar

y pr

oduc

ts a

nd tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

?1

1

/ app

ly th

e qu

estio

ns o

f thi

s se

ctio

n (2

.5)

and

sect

ion

2.6

Tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts.

54.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

wha

t ty

pe o

f fis

hing

did

you

do?

coa

stal

hig

h se

a


84

55.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r fis

hing

act

ivity…

wha

t w

ere

the

prin

cipa

l sp

ecie

s yo

u ex

trac

ted?

Cod

e1ho

w

muc

h w

as

extr

acte

d?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

of t

he a

mou

nt e

xtra

cted

, ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell.

..at

wha

t pr

ice

did

you

sell

your

pro

duct

…(lo

cal c

urre

ncy/

unit

of m

easu

rem

ent)

in th

e co

untr

y?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

abro

ad?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

1/ s

ee a

quac

ultu

re a

nd fi

sh s

peci

es a

nd p

rodu

cts

tabl

e.2

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.

56.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e yo

ur c

osts

for

1 …

fish

spe

cies

Cod

e2fu

el?

labo

r?re

nt o

f eq

uipm

ent

and

faci

litie

s?

depr

ecia

tion

of

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

3

paym

ent

of m

arin

e se

rvic

es?

repa

irs

of m

achi

nery

an

d eq

uipm

ent?

othe

r ac

tivi

ties

and

inpu

ts?4

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

aqu

acul

ture

and

fish

spe

cies

and

pro

duct

s ta

ble.

3/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.4

/ exp

ense

s su

ch a

s sh

ippi

ng, p

arts

, etc

.


57.

In t

he p

erio

d fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

r fis

h pr

oduc

ts h

ave

any

cert

ifica

tion…

1. fo

r en

viro

nmen

tal s

ervi

ces?

2. fo

r fo

od s

afet

y?

3. fo

r an

y ot

her

type

?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e ty

pe o

f cer

tific

atio

n it

had,

if a

ny.

58.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

perc

enta

ge o

f yo

ur f

ish

prod

ucts

wer

e ce

rtifi

ed?

fish

spe

cies

Cod

e1P

erce

ntag

e of

the

pro

duct

cer

tifi

ed

1. 2. 3.

1

/ see

aqu

acul

ture

and

fish

spe

cies

tab

le.

59.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1…

Did

you

rec

eive

sub

sidi

es f

or d

iese

l to

fuel

yo

ur b

oat?

1fo

r ho

w m

any

liter

s di

d yo

u re

ceiv

e th

e su

bsid

y?W

hat

was

the

tot

al a

mou

nt o

f su

bsid

ized

die

sel

that

you

use

d fo

r yo

ur f

ishi

ng a

ctiv

itie

s?

1

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

if af

firm

ativ

e.

Inte

rvie

wer

: R

ecor

d th

e pr

ice

per

liter

of

subs

idiz

ed d

iese

l as

of t

he d

ate

of t

akin

g th

e su

rvey

: __

____

____

loca

l cur

renc

y.

Did

you

rec

eive

sub

sidi

es f

or g

asol

ine

to

fuel

you

r bo

at?1

for

how

man

y lit

ers

did

you

rece

ive

the

subs

idy?

Wha

t w

as t

he t

otal

am

ount

of

subs

idiz

ed g

asol

ine

that

you

use

d fo

r yo

ur f

ishi

ng a

ctiv

itie

s?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x if

affir

mat

ive.

Inte

rvie

wer

: R

ecor

d th

e pr

ice

per

liter

of

subs

idiz

ed g

asol

ine

as o

f th

e da

te o

f ta

king

the

sur

vey:

___

____

___

loca

l cur

renc

y.


86

60.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

you

r fis

hing

act

ivity…

how

man

y fa

mily

m

embe

rs h

elpe

d yo

u?1

how

man

y ho

urs

per

day

on a

vera

ge d

id

they

hel

p yo

u?

for

how

man

y da

ys o

n av

erag

e di

d th

ey h

elp

you?

num

ber

of f

amily

day

’s

wor

k us

ed2

how

muc

h do

es a

day

’s w

ork

cost

in t

he

loca

lity

or r

egio

n?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf, if

suc

h is

the

case

.2

/ Int

ervi

ewer

: in

this

col

umn

the

resu

lt of

mul

tiply

ing

the

thre

e pr

evio

us c

olum

ns a

nd d

ivid

ing

by 8

sho

uld

be r

ecor

ded.

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o a

wor

king

day

whi

ch u

sual

ly la

sts

for

8 ho

urs.

Fam

ily d

ay’s

wor

k re

fers

to th

ose

fam

ily m

embe

rs w

ho h

elpe

d hi

m/h

er w

ithou

t rec

eivi

ng c

ompe

nsat

ion.

2.6

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts

61.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, d

id y

ou t

rans

form

or

proc

ess

prim

ary

prod

ucts

…

from

agr

icul

ture

?1fr

om li

vest

ock?

2fr

om a

quac

ultu

re a

nd/o

r fis

hing

?3

1

/ go

to q

uest

ion

62.

2/ g

o to

que

stio

n 6

4.3

/ go

to q

uest

ion

66.

2.6.

1 tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

cts

62.

from

201

0 t

o M

arch

201

1…

wha

t ty

pe o

f pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

did

yo

u ob

tain

?C

ode1

how

muc

h pr

oces

sed

prod

uct

did

you

obta

in?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

from

the

pro

cess

ed p

rodu

ctio

n ob

tain

ed,

wha

t am

ount

did

you

se

ll ...

At

wha

t pr

ice

did

you

sell

your

pr

oduc

ts…

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

in th

e co

untr

y?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

abro

ad?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

ee tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

tab

le.

2/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.


63.

for

the

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts y

ou o

btai

ned

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e yo

ur a

vera

ge m

onth

ly c

osts

for

1 …

Pro

cess

ed p

rodu

ctC

ode2

raw

m

ater

ials

?3la

bor?

fuel

?el

ectr

icit

y co

nsum

ptio

n?w

ater

co

nsum

ptio

n?ot

her

inpu

ts?4

ship

ping

?

rent

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

5

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

othe

r it

ems?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

tate

cos

ts in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.3

/ suc

h as

gra

in, f

ruit,

veg

etab

les,

am

ong

othe

r ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duct

s, p

urch

ased

. sub

sequ

ently

, if a

pplic

able

, th

e in

terv

iew

er s

houl

d ad

d to

this

item

the

cost

of p

rodu

ctio

n of

the

raw

mat

eria

ls p

rodu

ced

by th

e pr

oduc

er

him

/her

self

(pro

duct

ion

self-

cons

umpt

ion)

.4

/ inc

lude

the

cost

s of

mat

eria

ls s

uch

as b

oxes

, pla

stic

s, w

ires,

am

ong

othe

rs.

5/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at is

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.

2.6.

2 tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

cts

64.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011…

Wha

t ty

pe o

f pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

di

d yo

u ob

tain

?C

ode1

how

muc

h pr

oces

sed

prod

uct

did

you

obta

in?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

of t

he p

roce

ssed

pro

duct

ion

obta

ined

, ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell

...at

wha

t pr

ice

did

you

sell

your

pr

oduc

ts…

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

in th

e co

untr

y?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

abro

ad?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

ee tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

tab

le.

2/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.


88

65.

of

the

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts y

ou o

btai

ned

from

Apr

il 201

0 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e av

erag

e m

onth

ly c

osts

yo

u ha

d fo

r1…

Pro

cess

ed p

rodu

ctC

ode2

raw

m

ater

ials

?3la

bor?

fuel

?el

ectr

icit

y co

nsum

ptio

n?w

ater

co

nsum

ptio

n?ot

her

inpu

ts?4

ship

ping

?

rent

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

5

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

othe

r it

ems?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.3

/ suc

h as

milk

, ani

mal

s, s

kins

, oils

, hon

ey, a

nd w

ool,

amon

g ot

hers

, pur

chas

ed. s

ubse

quen

tly, i

f app

licab

le,

the

inte

rvie

wer

sho

uld

add

to th

is it

em th

e co

st o

f pro

duct

ion

of th

e ra

w m

ater

ials

pro

duce

d by

the

prod

ucer

hi

m/h

erse

lf (p

rodu

ctio

n se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

n).

4/ i

nclu

de th

e co

sts

of m

ater

ials

suc

h as

box

es, p

last

ics,

wire

, am

ong

othe

rs.

5/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

2.6.

3 tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

aqua

cultu

re a

nd/o

r fis

h pr

oduc

ts

66.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1…

Wha

t ty

pe o

f pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

di

d yo

u ob

tain

?C

ode1

how

muc

h pr

oces

sed

prod

uct

did

you

obta

in?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

of

the

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

tion

obt

aine

d, h

ow m

uch

did

you

sell.

..At

wha

t pr

ice

did

you

sell

your

pr

oduc

ts…

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

in th

e co

untr

y?U

nit o

f m

easu

rem

ent2

abro

ad?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2in

the

coun

try?

abro

ad?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

ee tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

tab

le.

2/ r

ecor

d th

e co

de a

ccor

ding

to th

e un

its o

f mea

sure

men

t tab

le.


67.

of

the

tran

sfor

med

or

proc

esse

d pr

oduc

ts y

ou o

btai

ned

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e th

e av

erag

e m

onth

ly c

osts

you

ha

d fo

r1 …

Pro

cess

ed p

rodu

ctC

ode2

raw

m

ater

ials

?3la

bor?

fuel

?el

ectr

icit

y co

nsum

ptio

n?w

ater

co

nsum

ptio

n?ot

her

inpu

ts?4

ship

ping

?

rent

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

5

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

othe

r it

ems?

1. 2. 3. 4.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

tran

sfor

med

pro

duct

s ta

ble.

3/ r

efer

s to

the

aqua

cultu

re a

nd/o

r fis

h sp

ecie

s th

at a

re tr

ansf

orm

ed.

4/ i

nclu

de th

e co

sts

of m

ater

ials

suc

h as

box

es, p

last

ics,

wire

, am

ong

othe

rs.

5/ t

he d

epre

ciat

ion

valu

e w

ill b

e ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e da

ta th

at a

re r

ecor

ded

in q

uest

ion

77.

2.6.

4 c

ompl

emen

tary

que

stio

ns

68.

In t

he p

erio

d fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

r pr

oduc

tion

have

any

cer

tific

atio

n1 …

1. fo

r fo

od s

afet

y?

2. fo

r en

viro

nmen

tal s

ervi

ces?

3. fo

r or

gani

c pr

oduc

t?

4. fo

r an

y ot

her

type

?

1

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

the

type

of c

ertif

icat

e yo

u ha

d, if

app

licab

le.


90

69.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

perc

enta

ge o

f yo

ur p

rodu

ctio

n w

as c

ertif

ied?

Pro

duct

Cod

e1P

erce

ntag

e of

pro

duct

ce

rtif

ied

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee tr

ansf

orm

ed o

r pr

oces

sed

prod

ucts

tab

le.

70.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

the

tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

or p

roce

ssin

g of

you

r pr

oduc

ts…

how

man

y fa

mily

mem

bers

he

lped

you

?1ho

w m

any

hour

s a

day

on a

vera

ge d

id

they

hel

p yo

u?fo

r ho

w m

any

days

on

aver

age

did

they

hel

p yo

u?n

umbe

r of

fam

ily d

ay’s

wor

k us

ed2

how

muc

h do

es a

day

’s w

ork

cost

in t

he lo

calit

y or

re

gion

?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf, if

suc

h is

the

case

.2

/ Int

ervi

ewer

: in

this

col

umn

you

shou

ld r

ecor

d th

e re

sults

of m

ultip

lyin

g th

e th

ree

prev

ious

col

umns

and

div

idin

g by

8.

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o on

e w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

nor

mal

ly is

8 h

ours

.Fa

mily

day

’s w

ork

refe

rs to

thos

e fa

mily

mem

bers

that

hel

ped

him

/her

with

out r

ecei

ving

any

com

pens

atio

n.

2.7

fore

stry

and

gat

herin

g ac

tiviti

es

71.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1…

wha

t sp

ecie

s or

pro

duct

s di

d yo

u m

ake

use

of a

nd/o

r ga

ther

?C

ode1

wha

t la

nd

area

did

you

m

ake

use

of?

(if a

pplic

able

)

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

how

muc

h di

d yo

u cu

t an

d/or

ga

ther

?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent2

of

the

amou

nt c

ut a

nd/o

r ga

ther

ed…

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll yo

ur p

rodu

ct?

(loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell?

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2

how

muc

h di

d yo

u us

e fo

r se

lf-co

nsum

ptio

n?3

Uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t2

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee fo

rest

ry a

nd c

olle

ctio

n sp

ecie

s an

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.2

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.3

/ if h

e/sh

e di

d no

t sel

l his

/her

pro

duct

ion

writ

e in

this

spa

ce th

e am

ount

con

sum

ed a

nd, i

n ad

ditio

n, a

sk th

e pr

ice

in th

e lo

calit

y or

reg

ion

of th

e pr

oduc

t con

sum

ed w

ritin

g it

in th

e sp

ace

corr

espo

ndin

g to

the

sale

pric

e.


72.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, w

hat

wer

e yo

ur c

osts

for

…

(Int

ervi

ewer

: K

eep

the

sam

e or

der

of s

peci

es o

r pr

oduc

ts a

s in

que

stio

n 71

)1

Spe

cies

or

prod

uct

Cod

e2es

tabl

ishm

ent

of y

our

plan

tati

on?

(if a

pplic

able

)

mai

nten

ance

of

the

plan

tati

on

(pru

ning

, hea

lth, w

eed

cont

rol,

amon

g ot

hers

)?cu

ttin

g an

d/or

col

lect

ion?

othe

r co

sts

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

fore

stry

and

gat

herin

g sp

ecie

s an

d pr

oduc

ts t

able

.

73.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

the

use

and

/or

gath

erin

g of

you

r pr

oduc

ts…

how

man

y fa

mily

mem

bers

he

lped

you

?1ho

w m

any

hour

s a

day

on

aver

age

did

they

hel

p yo

u?fo

r ho

w m

any

days

on

aver

age

did

they

hel

p yo

u?n

umbe

r of

fam

ily d

ay’s

w

ork

used

2

how

muc

h do

es a

day

’s

wor

k co

st in

you

r lo

calit

y or

reg

ion?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf, if

suc

h is

the

case

.2

/ Int

ervi

ewer

: in

this

col

umn

you

shou

ld r

ecor

d th

e re

sults

of m

ultip

lyin

g th

e th

ree

prev

ious

col

umns

and

div

idin

g by

8.

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o on

e w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

nor

mal

ly is

8 h

ours

.Fa

mily

day

’s w

ork

refe

rs to

thos

e fa

mily

mem

bers

that

hel

ped

him

/her

with

out r

ecei

ving

any

com

pens

atio

n.

2.8

non

-agr

icul

tura

l rur

al a

ctiv

ities

74.

from

201

0 t

o M

arch

201

1,…

wha

t ty

pe o

f no

n-ag

ricu

ltur

al a

ctiv

ity

did

you

do?

Cod

e1

how

muc

h w

ere

your

sal

es…

in t

he c

ount

ry…

abro

ad?

to in

term

edia

ries?

to th

e fin

al c

onsu

mer

?

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

ee n

on-a

gric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ities

tab

le.


92

75.

In y

our

non-

agric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ities

tha

t yo

u di

d fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

wha

t w

ere

your

ave

rage

mon

thly

cos

ts f

or1 …

non

-agr

icul

tura

l act

ivit

yC

ode2

raw

mat

eria

ls?3

labo

r?el

ectr

icit

y co

nsum

ptio

n?w

ater

co

nsum

ptio

n?sh

ippi

ng?

rent

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

depr

ecia

tion

of

mac

hine

ry,

equi

pmen

t an

d fa

cilit

ies?

4

how

muc

h di

d yo

u sp

end

on

othe

r ac

tivi

ties

and

inpu

ts?

1. 2. 3.

1/ s

tate

the

cost

s in

loca

l cur

renc

y.2

/ see

non

-agr

icul

tura

l rur

al a

ctiv

ities

tab

le.

3/ i

nclu

de th

e ra

w m

ater

ials

pur

chas

ed. s

ubse

quen

tly, i

f app

licab

le, t

he in

terv

iew

er s

houl

d ad

d to

this

item

the

cost

of

prod

uctio

n of

the

raw

mat

eria

ls p

rodu

ced

by th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf.4

/ the

dep

reci

atio

n va

lue

will

be

obta

ined

from

the

data

that

are

rec

orde

d in

que

stio

n 77

.

76.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

car

ryin

g ou

t yo

ur n

on-a

gric

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ity…

how

man

y fa

mily

m

embe

rs h

elpe

d yo

u?1

how

man

y ho

urs

a da

y on

ave

rage

did

the

y he

lp y

ou?

for

how

man

y da

ys o

n av

erag

e di

d th

ey h

elp

you?

num

ber

of f

amily

day

’s

wor

k us

ed2

how

muc

h do

es a

day

’s w

ork

cost

in

the

loca

lity

or r

egio

n?

1/ i

nclu

de th

e pr

oduc

er h

im/h

erse

lf, if

suc

h is

the

case

.2

/ Int

ervi

ewer

: in

this

col

umn

you

shou

ld r

ecor

d th

e re

sults

of m

ultip

lyin

g th

e th

ree

prev

ious

col

umns

and

div

idin

g by

8.

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o on

e w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

nor

mal

ly is

8 h

ours

.Fa

mily

day

’s w

ork

refe

rs to

thos

e fa

mily

mem

bers

that

hel

ped

him

/her

with

out r

ecei

ving

any

com

pens

atio

n.


2.9

farm

ass

ets

in th

e un

it of

pro

duct

ion

77.

of

the

follo

win

g fa

rm a

sset

s…

AS

SE

TC

ode1

you

are

owne

r of

…2

how

man

y un

its

do y

ou h

ave?

(if

appl

icab

le)

in w

hat

year

did

yo

u pu

rcha

se,

build

or

esta

blis

h it

?3

how

muc

h di

d it

cos

t?

(in lo

cal

curr

ency

)4

how

muc

h do

yo

u es

tim

ate

its

valu

e to

be

?4

If t

he a

sset

pur

chas

ed

was

use

d, h

ow m

any

year

s of

use

did

it

have

?3

InfR

ASTR

uC

TuR

E A

nD

fAC

IlIT

IES

1.w

areh

ouse

s an

d st

orag

e ar

eas4 ?

2.o

ffic

es?

3.g

reen

hous

e in

stal

latio

ns?

1___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

2__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

3__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

4.ir

rigat

ion

syst

ems?

1___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

2__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

5.c

orra

ls?4

6.m

ilkin

g pa

rlor?

7.P

oultr

y ho

uses

?4

8.P

ig in

stal

latio

ns?4

9.P

onds

?4

10.

Pac

king

pla

nt (f

acili

ty)?

11.

col

d ro

om?

12.

wor

k pl

ace

(non

-agr

icul

tura

l act

ivity

)?13

.o

ther

(spe

cify

):__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_14

.o

ther

(spe

cify

):__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_15

.o

ther

(spe

cify

):__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_


94

AS

SE

TC

ode1

you

are

owne

r of

…2

how

man

y un

its

do y

ou h

ave?

(if

appl

icab

le)

in w

hat

year

did

yo

u pu

rcha

se,

build

or

esta

blis

h it

?3

how

muc

h di

d it

cos

t?

(in lo

cal

curr

ency

)4

how

muc

h do

yo

u es

tim

ate

its

valu

e to

be

?4

If t

he a

sset

pur

chas

ed

was

use

d, h

ow m

any

year

s of

use

did

it

have

?3

16.

oth

er (s

peci

fy):

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

MAC

hIn

ERy

An

D E

Qu

IPM

EnT

17.

trac

tors

?

1___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

2__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

18.

agr

icul

tura

l im

plem

ents

?4

19.

thre

sher

and

har

vest

er?

20.

milk

ing

mac

hine

s?4

21.

coo

ling

tank

s?4

22.

feed

ing

trou

ghs?

4

23.

scal

e?24

.in

sem

inat

ion

equi

pmen

t?25

.fo

od m

ixer

?26

.c

ages

?4

27.

trai

lers

?4

28.

Pum

ps (w

ater

, oxy

gen,

air)

?4

29.

fish

ing

gear

?4

30.

fish

ing

boat

s?

1___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

2__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

3__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

31.

mac

hine

ry a

nd e

quip

men

t for

pac

kagi

ng o

r pr

oces

sing

?4

32.

mac

hine

ry a

nd e

quip

men

t for

non

-agr

icul

tura

l act

iviti

es4

33.

oth

er (s

peci

fy):

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___


AS

SE

TC

ode1

you

are

owne

r of

…2

how

man

y un

its

do y

ou h

ave?

(if

appl

icab

le)

in w

hat

year

did

yo

u pu

rcha

se,

build

or

esta

blis

h it

?3

how

muc

h di

d it

cos

t?

(in lo

cal

curr

ency

)4

how

muc

h do

yo

u es

tim

ate

its

valu

e to

be

?4

If t

he a

sset

pur

chas

ed

was

use

d, h

ow m

any

year

s of

use

did

it

have

?3

34.

oth

er (s

peci

fy):

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

35.

oth

er (s

peci

fy):

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

36.

oth

er (s

peci

fy):

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

ME

An

S o

f TR

An

SPo

RTA

TIo

n

37.

truc

k?38

.Li

ght t

ruck

?39

.tr

aile

r?4

0.o

ther

(spe

cify

):__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_41

.o

ther

(spe

cify

):__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_

1/ s

ee a

sset

s ta

ble.

2/ i

ndic

ate

with

an

x if

the

inte

rvie

wee

pos

sess

es th

e as

set i

ndic

ated

.3

/ if t

he in

terv

iew

ee h

as m

ore

than

one

uni

t of t

his

type

of a

sset

, in

this

col

umn

reco

rd o

nly

the

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

prin

cipa

l ass

et (o

f gre

ates

t val

ue)

or w

rite

the

aver

age

num

ber

whe

n al

l the

ass

ets

have

bee

n pu

rcha

sed

or b

uilt

in th

e sa

me

year

and

hav

e th

e sa

me

year

s of

use

at t

he ti

me

of p

urch

ase.

4/ i

f the

inte

rvie

wee

pos

sess

es m

ore

than

one

ass

et, r

ecor

d th

e to

tal (

sum

) co

st o

r va

lue

of th

e as

sets

.

III. o

ther

inco

me

78.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1…

did

you

have

add

itio

nal i

ncom

e to

wha

t yo

u ob

tain

ed in

you

r un

it o

f pr

oduc

tion

for

…1

how

muc

h m

oney

did

you

rec

eive

on

aver

age

mon

thly

?fo

r ho

w m

any

mon

ths

did

you

rece

ive

the

mon

ey?

1.su

ppor

t fro

m fa

mily

mem

bers

who

live

out

of t

he c

ount

ry?

2.su

ppor

t fro

m fa

mily

mem

bers

who

live

in th

e co

untr

y?

3.em

ploy

men

t out

side

of y

our

prod

uctio

n un

it?

4.re

nt o

f lan

d an

d/or

oth

er a

sset

s?

5.an

y ot

her?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x if

the

inte

rvie

wee

rec

eive

s th

e in

com

e in

dica

ted.


96

IV. g

over

nmen

t as

sist

ance

11

79.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1…

Pro

gram

sw

ere

you

a be

nefi

ciar

y of

or

did

you

rece

ive

aid

from

…1

Wha

t w

as t

he a

mou

nt o

f ai

d th

at y

ou r

ecei

ved?

(in lo

cal c

urre

ncy)

how

man

y tim

es d

id y

ou r

ecei

ve t

he a

id in

the

in

dica

ted

peri

od?

PRo

gR

AM

S o

f Th

E M

InIS

TRy

of

AgR

ICu

lTu

RE

2

1.P

rogr

am o

f sup

port

for

purc

hase

of i

nput

s

2.P

rogr

am fo

r ru

ral d

evel

opm

ent

3.h

ydro

-agr

icul

ture

pro

gram

4.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

pro

duct

ion

proj

ects

5.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

wom

en in

agr

icul

ture

oTh

ER g

oVE

Rn

MEn

TAl

PRo

gR

AM

S

6.st

ate

prog

ram

s

7.m

unic

ipal

pro

gram

s

8.o

ther

9.

oth

er

1/ i

ndic

ate

with

an

x if

the

inte

rvie

wee

is b

enef

icia

ry o

f the

indi

cate

d pr

ogra

m.

2/ I

nter

view

er: i

f the

inte

rvie

wee

is b

enef

icia

ry o

f a p

rogr

am o

f the

min

istr

y of

agr

icul

ture

, he/

she

shou

ld a

lso

answ

er s

ectio

n vi

i.

V. f

inan

cial

ser

vice

s80

. fr

om A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

rec

eive

any

loan

s fo

r ca

rryi

ng o

ut a

gric

ultu

ral,

aqua

cultu

re, fis

hing

and

/or

othe

r pr

oduc

tion

activ

ities

in t

he r

ural

sec

tor?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

i

f no,

go

to q

uest

ion

83.

11

each

cou

ntry

has

its

own

prog

ram

s, s

o he

re r

efer

ence

is m

ade

only

to s

ome

exam

ples

.


81.

In

rela

tion

to t

he lo

an y

ou r

ecei

ved…

how

muc

h w

as t

he a

mou

nt r

ecei

ved?

wha

t in

stit

utio

n ga

ve y

ou t

he lo

an?1

1. P

ublic

rur

al b

ank

2. P

rivat

e ba

nk

3. c

redi

t Uni

on, s

avin

gs b

ank,

sav

ings

and

Loa

n

coo

pera

tive

or o

ther

fina

ncia

l bro

ker

1/ m

ark

with

an

x.

82.

The

loan

rec

eive

d w

as u

sed

for1 .

..

1. t

he p

urch

ase

of in

puts

for

yo

ur a

ctiv

ity?

2. th

e ac

quis

itio

n of

mac

hine

ry

and/

or e

quip

men

t?3.

the

con

stru

ctio

n of

infr

astr

uctu

re

or f

acili

ties

?4.

the

purc

hase

of

an

imal

s?5.

the

esta

blis

hmen

t or

pur

chas

e

of

plan

tati

ons?

26.

acqu

irin

g so

me

othe

r ty

pe o

f

as

sets

?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e ite

m o

r co

ncep

t for

whi

ch th

e lo

an h

as b

een

used

.

VI. A

gro-

food

and

fis

hing

info

rmat

ion,

tec

hnol

ogic

al in

nova

tion,

mar

kets

and

tra

inin

g

83.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

rec

eive

, as

k fo

r or

hav

e ac

cess

to

any

type

of

info

rmat

ion

on t

he a

gro-

food

and

fis

hing

sec

tor

prov

ided

by

the

Min

istr

y of

Agr

icul

ture

rel

ated

to

your

pro

duct

ion

activ

ity?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

if no

, go

to q

uest

ion

85.

84.

The

info

rmat

ion

you

used

fro

m t

he M

inis

try

of A

gric

ultu

re…

was

it e

asy

to a

cces

s?

was

it u

sefu

l?w

as it

ava

ilabl

e in

a t

imel

y m

anne

r?2

yes:

(1)_

____

n

o:(0

)___

___

yes:

(1)_

____

n

o:(0

)___

___

yes:

(1)_

____

n

o:(0

)___

___

1/ m

ark

with

an

x.

2/ t

his

refe

rs to

whe

ther

the

info

rmat

ion

was

ava

ilabl

e at

the

time

the

prod

ucer

req

uest

ed o

r ne

eded

it.


98

85.

In t

he p

erio

d in

dica

ted,

hav

e yo

u co

nsul

ted

any

stud

y or

ana

lysi

s th

at p

rovi

des

you

with

info

rmat

ion

on t

he p

ossi

bilit

ies

of d

evel

opm

ent

in t

he a

gro-

food

sec

tor,

use

of n

ew t

echn

olog

ies,

mar

ket

oppo

rtun

ities

, am

ong

othe

r as

pect

s?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

86.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, d

id y

ou r

ecei

ve a

ny t

ype

of t

rain

ing

or t

echn

ical

ass

ista

nce

by a

pro

fess

iona

l ser

vice

pro

vide

r?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

if

no,

go

to q

uest

ion

88.

87. I

f yo

u re

ceiv

ed t

rain

ing

or t

echn

ical

ass

ista

nce

in t

he a

bove

indi

cate

d pe

riod,

are

you

cur

rent

ly s

till a

pply

ing

the

tech

nica

l

reco

mm

enda

tions

tha

t th

e pr

ofes

sion

al s

ervi

ce p

rovi

der

gave

you

?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

88.

fro

m A

pril

2010

to

Mar

ch 2

011,

did

you

app

ly o

r m

ake

chan

ges

in y

our

prac

tices

or

proc

edur

es in

the

pro

duct

ion

activ

ity y

ou e

ngag

e in

?

yes:

(1)

no:

(0)

89.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, t

o im

prov

e th

e m

arke

ting

of y

our

prod

ucts

did

you

use

1 …

1.st

udie

s fo

r th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

gro-

food

mar

kets

?

2.ag

ro-f

ood

prod

uct p

rom

otio

n ca

mpa

igns

?

3.co

mm

erci

al m

issi

ons,

pro

mot

iona

l fai

rs a

nd/o

r m

arke

t int

egra

tion

foru

ms?

4.a

dire

ctor

y of

agr

o-fo

od p

rodu

ct e

xpor

ters

?

5.co

llect

ive

mar

ks o

f agr

o-fo

od p

rodu

cts?

6.an

y ot

her

stud

y?

1/ m

ark

with

an

x th

e to

ol th

at h

as b

een

used

.


VII.

Satis

fact

ion

of t

he b

enef

icia

ry

90.

how

was

the

ser

vice

1 y

ou r

ecei

ved

from

the

off

icer

s re

spon

sibl

e fo

r op

erat

ing

the

prog

ram

2…

1.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

the

purc

hase

of i

nput

sP

oor:(

0)__

__

ave

rage

:(1)_

___

goo

d:(2

)___

_

2.P

rogr

am o

f rur

al d

evel

opm

ent

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

3.h

ydro

-agr

icul

ture

pro

gram

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

4.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

pro

duct

ion

proj

ects

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

5.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

wom

en in

agr

icul

ture

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

1/ f

or e

xam

ple,

trea

tmen

t rec

eive

d at

the

coun

ter,

resp

onse

to q

uest

ions

and

com

plai

nts,

tim

elin

ess

of r

espo

nse

to y

our

requ

est,

and

the

timel

ines

s of

del

iver

y of

the

prog

ram

goo

d or

ser

vice

, am

ong

othe

r as

pect

s.2

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

the

corr

espo

ndin

g re

spon

se.

91.

Wha

t do

you

con

side

r w

as t

he q

ualit

y1 o

f th

e su

ppor

t yo

u re

ceiv

ed t

hrou

gh t

he p

rogr

am2 …

1.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

the

purc

hase

of i

nput

sP

oor:(

0)__

__

ave

rage

:(1)_

___

goo

d:(2

)___

_

2.P

rogr

am o

f rur

al d

evel

opm

ent

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

3.h

ydro

-agr

icul

ture

pro

gram

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

4.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

pro

duct

ion

proj

ects

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

5.P

rogr

am to

sup

port

wom

en in

agr

icul

ture

Poo

r:(0)

____

a

vera

ge:(1

)___

_

g

ood:

(2)_

___

1/ r

efer

s to

whe

ther

the

supp

ort h

ad th

e ap

prop

riate

tech

nica

l cha

ract

eris

tics

and

if it

was

ade

quat

e fo

r th

e ne

eds

of th

e be

nefic

iary

.2

/ mar

k w

ith a

n x

the

corr

espo

ndin

g re

spon

se.

VIII.

Com

plem

enta

ry q

uest

ions

(top

ics

of s

tate

inte

rest

)

92.

from

Apr

il 20

10 t

o M

arch

201

1, in

the

dev

elop

men

t of

you

r pr

oduc

tion

activ

ity(

ies)

…

how

man

y sa

lari

ed d

ay’s

wor

k di

d yo

u us

e?1

for

how

man

y da

ys o

n av

erag

e di

d yo

u hi

re t

hem

?2h

ow m

uch

on a

vera

ge d

id y

ou p

ay p

er h

ired

day

’s w

ork?

a d

ay’s

wor

k is

equ

ival

ent t

o on

e w

orki

ng d

ay w

hich

nor

mal

ly la

sts

8 ho

urs.

1/ a

sal

arie

d da

y’s

wor

k is

a d

ay’s

wor

k th

at r

ecei

ves

econ

omic

com

pens

atio

n fo

r th

e w

ork

done

.2

/ if a

day

’s w

ork

was

con

trac

ted

for

the

who

le y

ear,

270

days

of w

ork

shou

ld b

e re

cord

ed (

annu

al e

quiv

alen

t day

’s w

ork)

.


100

93.

of

the

tota

l lan

d ar

ea t

hat

you

wor

ked

in t

he 2

010

agr

icul

tura

l yea

r in

you

r pr

oduc

tion

unit…

how

muc

h la

nd a

rea

corr

espo

nds

to la

nd

that

is…

uni

t of

mea

sure

men

t1

1.yo

urs?

2.re

nted

?

3.sh

arec

ropp

ed?

4.lo

aned

?

5.ow

ned

in a

ny o

ther

form

?

1

/ rec

ord

the

code

acc

ordi

ng to

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.

94.

As

a re

sult

of y

our

prod

uctio

n ac

tiviti

es c

arrie

d ou

t be

twee

n Apr

il 20

10 a

nd M

arch

201

11 …

wha

t pr

oduc

t(s)

did

you

se

ll?2

Cod

e3ho

w m

uch

did

you

sell?

uni

t of

m

easu

rem

ent4

at w

hat

pric

e di

d yo

u se

ll? (

loca

l cur

renc

y/un

it of

mea

sure

men

t)

on w

hat

date

did

you

mak

e th

e sa

le?

(mon

th a

nd y

ear)

buy

er (

nam

e an

d/or

eco

nom

ic

line

of b

usin

ess)

Pla

ce o

f sa

le

(loca

lity,

m

unic

ipal

ity, s

tate

)S

ale

cond

itio

ns5

1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

1/ t

his

ques

tion

does

not

app

ly fo

r no

n-ag

ricul

tura

l rur

al a

ctiv

ities

.2

/ if t

he s

ame

prod

uct w

as s

old

in m

ore

than

one

ope

ratio

n, th

e in

form

atio

n sh

ould

be

item

ized

and

rec

orde

d fo

r ea

ch

oper

atio

n se

para

tely

. if i

t is

a pr

oduc

t sol

d da

ily o

r w

eekl

y, r

ecor

d th

e in

form

atio

n ad

ding

the

data

for

each

of t

he d

iffer

ent

buye

rs o

f the

pro

duct

sol

d du

ring

the

perio

d of

ana

lysi

s. t

his

ques

tion

does

not

app

ly in

thos

e ca

ses

in w

hich

the

sale

s ar

e re

tail

sale

s to

the

final

con

sum

er.

3/ s

ee th

e so

ld p

rodu

cts

tabl

e.4

/ see

the

units

of m

easu

rem

ent t

able

.5

/ spe

cify

if th

e sa

le p

aym

ent w

as in

full,

in in

stal

lmen

ts, i

n ki

nd, b

y co

nsig

nmen

t or

unde

r so

me

othe

r fo

rm.


95.

of

the

farm

ass

ets

you

own

in y

our

unit

of p

rodu

ctio

n, p

urch

ased

bet

wee

n Apr

il 20

10 a

nd M

arch

201

11 …

A

SSE

TC

ode2

from

who

m d

id y

ou b

uy it

(na

me

of s

uppl

ier)

?Pla

ce w

here

you

bou

ght

the

asse

t(lo

calit

y, m

unic

ipal

ity, s

tate

)P

urch

ase

cond

itio

ns3

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

1

/ exc

lude

s as

sets

bui

lt by

ow

ner

(infr

astr

uctu

re a

nd fa

cilit

ies)

.2

/ see

ass

ets

tabl

e.3

/ spe

cify

if th

e pa

ymen

t for

the

purc

hase

was

in c

ash,

on

cred

it, o

r un

der

som

e ot

her

form

.


102


annexes4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IV


104

annex 1

sampling framework for the baseline study of the 2008sagaRPa Programs

StateStratified Population

non-stratified population

non-listed Population Total Population

REu % REu % REu % REu %

Aguascalientes 21,266 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 21,266 100.0

baja California 8,175 36.2 5,129 22.7 9,280 41.1 22,584 100.0

baja California Sur 8,099 87.2 0 0.0 1,190 12.8 9,289 100.0

Campeche 25,580 47.3 9,621 17.8 18,933 35.0 54,134 100.0

Chiapas 225,132 45.0 0 0.0 275,595 55.0 500,727 100.0

Chihuahua 87,560 68.4 9,784 7.6 30,608 23.9 127,952 100.0

Coahuila 54,878 90.2 1,263 2.1 4,691 7.7 60,832 100.0

Colima 16,177 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 16,177 100.0

Durango 128,668 72.8 1,179 0.7 46,891 26.5 176,738 100.0

guanajuato 149,510 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 149,510 100.0

guerrero 474,599 92.2 39,982 7.8 0 0.0 514,581 100.0

hidalgo 115,808 53.2 2,657 1.2 99,218 45.6 217,683 100.0

jalisco 104,094 58.7 39,409 22.2 33,804 19.1 177,307 100.0

México 198,967 63.6 113,650 36.4 0 0.0 312,617 100.0

Michoacán 154,649 50.6 139,763 45.8 10,977 3.6 305,389 100.0

Morelos 75,576 96.6 0 0.0 2,628 3.4 78,204 100.0

nayarit 27,323 31.5 4,500 5.2 54,812 63.3 86,635 100.0

nuevo león 37319 88.8 0 0.0 4691 11.2 42010 100.0

oaxaca 496,835 75.1 164,498 24.9 0 0.0 661,333 100.0

Puebla 287,051 93.0 0 0.0 21,505 7.0 308,556 100.0

Querétaro 42,333 82.9 7,206 14.1 1,530 3.0 51,069 100.0

Quintana Roo 27,302 51.8 0 0.0 25,440 48.2 52,742 100.0

San luis Potosí 124,081 65.4 0 0.0 65,565 34.6 189,646 100.0

Sinaloa 198,041 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 198,041 100.0

Sonora 43,853 49.1 0 0.0 45,471 50.9 89,324 100.0

Tabasco 70,525 64.4 38,972 35.6 0 0.0 109,497 100.0

Tamaulipas 57,333 57.2 42,936 42.8 0 0.0 100,269 100.0

Tlaxcala 73,649 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 73,649 100.0

Veracruz 425,647 97.5 11,021 2.5 0 0.0 436,668 100.0

yucatán 74,478 48.0 17,763 11.4 62,899 40.5 155,140 100.0

Zacatecas 85,131 68.2 0 0.0 39,730 31.8 124,861 100.0

Total 3,919,639 72.3 649,333 12.0 855,458 15.8 5,424,430 100.0

Source: Prepared by author with data provided by states.


annex 2

sample size by stratum by state

StatesStrata

TotalE11 E12 E13 E21 E22 E23 E31 E32 E33

Aguascalientes 14 6 0 133 15 0 647 175 0 990

baja California 19 2 1 58 5 1 118 11 1 216

baja California Sur 13 22 19 46 62 117 53 81 40 453

Campeche 381 23 3 36 10 1 41 3 0 498

Chiapas 469 84 40 30 10 7 5 2 1 647

Chihuahua 140 28 20 17 11 9 148 124 110 606

Coahuila 0 0 0 49 3 3 410 39 50 554

Colima 18 3 0 60 19 3 92 60 8 264

Durango 118 4 6 174 10 8 369 28 24 741

guanajuato 79 59 68 47 54 71 42 35 60 514

guerrero 704 26 28 96 17 17 35 16 16 955

hidalgo 126 139 65 30 53 42 40 96 100 691

jalisco 68 12 7 80 13 10 248 58 31 527

México 452 13 5 212 8 4 258 13 5 970

Michoacán 110 52 91 60 54 62 51 67 70 617

Morelos 250 44 31 218 43 36 317 73 61 1,074

nayarit 142 3 0 84 3 0 222 25 7 486

nuevo león 13 111 428 2 16 78 10 71 265 993

oaxaca 1,057 111 36 131 30 11 51 11 4 1,442

Puebla 387 30 20 94 30 15 54 20 15 665

Querétaro 101 23 50 33 12 23 49 22 39 351

Quintana Roo 32 24 21 25 31 42 2 5 5 186

San luis Potosí 197 37 19 47 22 33 45 47 114 563

Sinaloa 78 60 41 53 49 46 131 244 289 990

Sonora 2 3 34 1 5 67 9 27 443 591

Tabasco 11 180 369 5 70 74 6 102 103 919

Tamaulipas 14 21 9 15 15 12 121 140 83 430

Tlaxcala 318 37 14 75 7 3 67 6 1 527

Veracruz 136 232 480 46 115 218 22 68 112 1,428

yucatán 253 17 23 62 4 7 9 0 1 375

Zacatecas 60 19 1 13 162 1 145 83 3 487

Total 5,761 1,423 1,928 2,032 957 1,023 3,815 1,752 2,063 20,753



106

annex 3

sample size by state for non-stratified listed population

State reU State reU

Aguascalientes 0 nayarit 80

baja California 134 nuevo león 0

baja California Sur 0 oaxaca 448

Campeche 187 Puebla 0

Chiapas 0 Querétaro 60

Chihuahua 68 Quintana Roo 0

Coahuila 13 San luis Potosí 0

Colima 0 Sinaloa 0

Durango 7 Sonora 0

guanajuato 0 Tabasco 508

guerrero 80 Tamaulipas 322

hidalgo 16 Tlaxcala 0

jalisco 200 Veracruz 37

México 553 yucatán 89

Michoacán 558 Zacatecas 0

Morelos 0 Total 3,360



annex 4

sample size by state for non-listed population

State reU State reU

Aguascalientes 0 nayarit 97

baja California 43 nuevo león 125

baja California Sur 47 oaxaca 284

Campeche 50 Puebla 100

Chiapas 129 Querétaro 13

Chihuahua 61 Quintana Roo 37

Coahuila 0 San luis Potosí 84

Colima 0 Sinaloa 0

Durango 148 Sonora 118

guanajuato 0 Tabasco 0

guerrero 0 Tamaulipas 0

hidalgo 138 Tlaxcala 0

jalisco 105 Veracruz 0

México 0 yucatán 75

Michoacán 123 Zacatecas 227

Morelos 208 Total 2,214



108


110

results-based public management - fao

Documents