research methods in psychology observation - naturalistic
TRANSCRIPT
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Research Methods in Psychology
Observation
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observational Research
Researchers cannot observe• all of a person’s behavior
• all people’s behavior
Researchers can observe• samples of individuals
• samples of behavior at particular times• samples of different settings and conditions
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observational Research
Goal of samples• represent larger population of
behaviors people settings and conditions
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observational Research
Example:• In a typical week, how many hours of
television do you watch? What is the average number of hours for the
class?
• Is this average representative of the number of hours of TV watched by all students on campus? all college students? all people?
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observational Research
Use data from a sample to represent the population• “generalize” the findings from sample to
population
External validity• extent to which a study’s findings may be
used to describe people, settings, conditions
• beyond those used in the study
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observational Research
Generalize findings• sample must be representative of population
is sample similar to population? do we know characteristics of entire population?
Psychology studies with college student samples• are psychology students representative of
larger population?
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Sampling Behavior
Extent to which observations may be generalized (external validity)• depends on how behavior is sampled
Two methods• time sampling• situation sampling
Goal: obtain representative sample of behavior
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Sampling Behavior, continued
Time Sampling• choose time intervals for making observations
systematic random
• don’t use time sampling for observing behavior during rare events (e.g., hurricane) event sampling
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Sampling Behavior, continued
Situation Sampling• choose different settings, circumstances,
conditions for observations• enhances external validity• use subject sampling to observe some people
within a situation
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Classification of Observational Methods
Categories based on intervention by researcher• Observation without Intervention• Observation with Intervention
Categories based on methods for recording behavior• comprehensive record• selected behaviors
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation without Intervention
Naturalistic Observation• observation in natural (real-world) setting without
attempt to intervene or change situation• use when ethical considerations prevent experimental
manipulation
Goals• describe “normal” behavior, examine relationships
among naturally occurring variables• establish external validity of lab findings
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation with Intervention
Most psychological research involves intervention
Three methods in natural settings• participant observation• structured observation• field experiment
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation with Intervention, continued
Participant observation• observer is active participant in the natural
setting he or she observes undisguised: people know they’re being observed disguised: people don’t know they’re being
observed
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation with Intervention, continued
Problems with participant observation• Reactivity
when people change their usual behavior because they’re being observed
disguised participant observation controls reactivity
• Observers lose objectivity or become too involved in situation
• Observers influence behavior of people they’re observing
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation with Intervention, continued
Structured observation• set up (structure) specific situation in order to
observe behavior• used when behavior is difficult to observe as it
naturally occurs• researchers use confederates to structure
situations• problems: when observers don’t follow same
procedures across observations
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Observation with Intervention, continued
Field Experiment• manipulate independent variable in natural
setting and observe behavior (dependent variable) two or more conditions to compare (IV) often use confederates to create conditions strive for control in natural setting
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Recording Behavior, continued
Qualitative Records• Narrative records: complete reproduction of
behavior (video, audio, field notes)• made during or soon after behavior occurs• carefully train observers• advantage: can review record often• disadvantage: costly, time-consuming
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Recording Behavior, continued
Quantitative Records• Selected behaviors
• Requires decision regarding how to measure behavior (e.g., frequency, duration)
• checklists, electronic recording and tracking
Measurement Scales• Four levels for quantifying behavior
nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio
Correlational Resarch
Collects a set of facts organized into two or more categories• measure parents disciplinary style• measure children’s behavior
Examines the relationships between 2 or more categories e.g., more democratic parents have children
who behave better
Correlational Research
Correlation CANNOT prove causation• Do democratic parents produce better
behaved children?• Do better behaved children encourage
parents to be democratic?
May be an unmeasured common factor • e.g., good neighborhoods produce
democratic adults and well behaved children
Correlational Research
Scatterplots – graphed cluster of dots, each of which represents the values of two variables• See pg. 27 for examples
Correlation Coefficient – a statistical measure of relationship• Statistical measure of the extent to which
two factors vary together, and thus of how well either factor predicts the other.
Correlational Research
Direction of a Correlation
(slope of the points) Positive Correlation – as one variable
goes up, the other variable tends to go up (so as one goes down, the other goes down) – max. +1.00
Negative Correlation – as one variable goes up, the other tends to go down, the inverse is also true – min. -1.00
No Correlation – correlation is 0.0
Strength of Correlation
(amount of scatter) The higher the correlation coefficient is
(without regard to sign) the stronger the correlation is.
The stronger the correlation is, the better one variable can predict the other.
Correlational Research
Correlations make visible relationships that we might otherwise miss.
They also restrain our “seeing” relationships that actually do not exist – illusory correlations – perception of a relationship where none exists
(e.g., superstitious beliefs)
Believe – likely to notice and recall
Correlational Research
A little note about correlation –
CORRELATION DOES NOT PROVE
CAUSATION!!
Primary Research: Experimental Research
Experiment • Investigator manipulates a variable under carefully controlled conditions and observes whether changes occur in a second variable• Used to detect cause-and-effect relationships
Conditions that make a true experiment• Manipulation of independent variables• Random assignment into experimental conditions (experimental conditions & control)
Primary Research: Experimental and Control Groups
Experimental group•Subjects who receive some special treatment in regard to the independent variable
Control group•Subjects who do not receive the special treatment given to the experimental group
LOGIC: If the 2 groups are identical except for the variation created by the manipulation of IV, then any
differences between groups must be due to manipulation of the IV
Sample
ExperimentalControl
Measure DV
Example of Experimental Design
Advantages and Disadvantages of Experimental Research
+ permit cause-and-effect conclusions
- lab experiments tend to be artificial
- cannot be used to explore some research questions
•Participants must be and are selected for different conditions from pre–existing groups
•Levels of the IV are/may be selected from pre–existing values and not created through manipulation by the researcher
•Unlike true experimental designs where participants are randomly assigned to experimental and control groups, with quasi–experimental designs they are NOT
•Quasi–experiments DO NOT permit the researcher to control the assignment of participants to conditions or groups
Primary Research Field Experiments: Quasi-Experiments