research article a new 7-level symmetric multilevel...

10
Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Electronics Volume 2013, Article ID 476876, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476876 Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches S. Umashankar, T. S. Sreedevi, V. G. Nithya, and D. Vijayakumar School of Electrical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil nadu 632014, India Correspondence should be addressed to T. S. Sreedevi; [email protected] Received 3 June 2013; Accepted 9 July 2013 Academic Editors: T. L. Kunii and X. Yang Copyright © 2013 S. Umashankar et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ough the multilevel inverters hold attractive features, usage of more switches in the conventional configuration poses a limitation to its wide range application. erefore, a renewed 7-level multilevel inverter topology is introduced incorporating the least number of unidirectional switches and gate trigger circuitry, thereby ensuring the minimum switching losses, reducing size and installation cost. e new topology is well suited for drives and renewable energy applications. e performance quality in terms of THD and switching losses of the new MLI is compared with conventional cascaded MLI and other existing 7-level reduced switch topologies using carrier-based PWM techniques. e results are validated using MATLAB/SIMULINK. 1. Introduction e term “multilevel inverter” was rooted years ago. Mul- tilevel inverters offer various applications in voltage rang- ing from medium to high such as in renewable sources, industrial drives, laminators, blowers, fans, and conveyors. Small voltage step results in making the multilevel inverters withstand better voltage, fewer harmonics, high electro- magnetic compatibility, reduced switching loss, and better power quality [1]. Cascaded multilevel inverters were developed in the initial stage. Later, diode-clamped MLI’S were developed followed by flying capacitor MLI’S. ese three topologies utilise different mechanisms to produce the required output. e topology introduced first, that is, the CMLI, is simply series connection of H-bridges. e diode-clamped MLI uses series capacitor bank whereas, in flying capacitor mli, floating capacitors are used in order to clamp the output voltage [1]. H-bridge inverters have isolation transformers, and then H- bridge cascaded MLIS were introduced to separate DC input sources. But they do not need either clamping a diode or flying capacitors. Absence of voltage imbalance is the main advantage of cascaded mli. Fewer components are used in CMLI compared to diode-clamped and flying capacitor mlis [24]. Most of the researches are carried out in cascaded MLI configuration. But still the new trends are involved in the evolution of renewed multilevel inverters. Modifications are made in its inbuilt structure. A 7-level MLI was generated with 9 switches reducing 3 switches from the main conven- tional CMLI [5]. It offers good results yielding desired a 7- level output with low THD. A 7 level MLI with 7 switches reducing 2 more switches from the previous topology made a far improvement in the investigation of the switch reduction [6]. Yet another topology of 7-level MLI was configured with 4 dc sources and just 6 switches to get 7-level output [7]. e latter made a drastic move in topology development since the THD is low, and gate circuits used to drive the switches are less. It is mentioned everywhere that simplicity is the main advantage of CMLI to generate 5 levels using 8 switches, 7 levels with 12 switches, 9 levels with 16 switches, and so on [24, 8]. It clearly reveals that an increase in levels demands more number of switches. en the comment on simplicity of CMLI is simply contradictory. Hence, the focus was eyeing on a real solution to this problem, that is, how to simplify the complex circuit. en arise the concept of “switch reduction”. Exploring the existing topologies on basic 7 level, switch reduction was made from 12 switches to 9, gradually to 7 and then to 6.

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

Hindawi Publishing CorporationISRN ElectronicsVolume 2013, Article ID 476876, 9 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476876

Research ArticleA New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with MinimumNumber of Switches

S. Umashankar, T. S. Sreedevi, V. G. Nithya, and D. Vijayakumar

School of Electrical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil nadu 632014, India

Correspondence should be addressed to T. S. Sreedevi; [email protected]

Received 3 June 2013; Accepted 9 July 2013

Academic Editors: T. L. Kunii and X. Yang

Copyright © 2013 S. Umashankar et al.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Though themultilevel inverters hold attractive features, usage of more switches in the conventional configuration poses a limitationto its wide range application.Therefore, a renewed 7-level multilevel inverter topology is introduced incorporating the least numberof unidirectional switches and gate trigger circuitry, thereby ensuring the minimum switching losses, reducing size and installationcost. The new topology is well suited for drives and renewable energy applications. The performance quality in terms of THD andswitching losses of the newMLI is compared with conventional cascaded MLI and other existing 7-level reduced switch topologiesusing carrier-based PWM techniques. The results are validated using MATLAB/SIMULINK.

1. Introduction

The term “multilevel inverter” was rooted years ago. Mul-tilevel inverters offer various applications in voltage rang-ing from medium to high such as in renewable sources,industrial drives, laminators, blowers, fans, and conveyors.Small voltage step results in making the multilevel inverterswithstand better voltage, fewer harmonics, high electro-magnetic compatibility, reduced switching loss, and betterpower quality [1].

Cascaded multilevel inverters were developed in theinitial stage. Later, diode-clamped MLI’S were developedfollowed by flying capacitor MLI’S. These three topologiesutilise different mechanisms to produce the required output.The topology introduced first, that is, the CMLI, is simplyseries connection of H-bridges.The diode-clampedMLI usesseries capacitor bankwhereas, in flying capacitormli, floatingcapacitors are used in order to clamp the output voltage [1].H-bridge inverters have isolation transformers, and then H-bridge cascaded MLIS were introduced to separate DC inputsources. But they do not need either clamping a diode orflying capacitors. Absence of voltage imbalance is the mainadvantage of cascaded mli. Fewer components are used inCMLI compared to diode-clamped and flying capacitor mlis[2–4].

Most of the researches are carried out in cascaded MLIconfiguration. But still the new trends are involved in theevolution of renewed multilevel inverters. Modifications aremade in its inbuilt structure. A 7-level MLI was generatedwith 9 switches reducing 3 switches from the main conven-tional CMLI [5]. It offers good results yielding desired a 7-level output with low THD. A 7 level MLI with 7 switchesreducing 2 more switches from the previous topology made afar improvement in the investigation of the switch reduction[6]. Yet another topology of 7-level MLI was configured with4 dc sources and just 6 switches to get 7-level output [7]. Thelatter made a drastic move in topology development since theTHD is low, and gate circuits used to drive the switches areless.

It is mentioned everywhere that simplicity is the mainadvantage of CMLI to generate 5 levels using 8 switches, 7levels with 12 switches, 9 levels with 16 switches, and so on[2–4, 8]. It clearly reveals that an increase in levels demandsmore number of switches. Then the comment on simplicityof CMLI is simply contradictory. Hence, the focus was eyeingon a real solution to this problem, that is, how to simplify thecomplex circuit. Then arise the concept of “switch reduction”.Exploring the existing topologies on basic 7 level, switchreduction was made from 12 switches to 9, gradually to 7 andthen to 6.

Page 2: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

2 ISRN Electronics

V1

V2

......

...

Vout

+

S11

S12

S13

S14

S21

S22

S23

S24

Sn1

Sn2

Sn3

Sn4

Vn

Figure 1: Conventional cascaded n-level MLI.

Load

+−

+−

+−

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

S7

S8

S9

Figure 2: 7-level 9-switch topology.

Aiming at reducing the switches to the maximum pos-sible extent and reducing complexity, the new topology isintroduced with 5 switches for 7 levels, and this would bethe least possible reduction. The new MLI configuration ismade of 5 switches eliminating 1 switch from the existing 6switches, 7-level topology [7] in a special arrangement with4 inputs DC sources to generate 7 level output. The lessswitches we use lessen the cost of circuit building.The circuitcredibility is checked without using pwm. Then identifyingthe effectiveness in working simulated the circuit with PD,POD, and APOD using MATLAB/SIMULINK.

(1) Conventional Topology. Using 3 DC voltage sources, 3H-bridge units each with 4 switches together forming 12switches in total are used in conventional CMLI which isrepresented in Figure 1. General expression for output voltagelevels, 𝑚 = (𝑛 + 2)/2 where 𝑛 is the number of switches inthe configuration. Each Bridge is outputting 3 Levels, +Vdc,0, −Vdc. Cascading 3 Bridges in such a fashion to producestepped 7 level staircase waveforms.

(2) Existing Topology

(a) 7-Level, 9 Switches. This topology which is shownin Figure 2 is built with 3 dc sources, 1 H-bridgecomposed of 4 switches and then additional 5 more

Load

+

+

+

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

S1

S4 S2

S3

S5

S7

S6

Figure 3: 7-level 7-switch topology.

Load

+

+

+

+

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

S4

S6

S5S3

S2

S1

Figure 4: 7-Level 6-switch topology.

switches for producing stepped 7 levels, for positiveand negative half cycles. Table 1 represent the switch-ing scheme for this topology.

(b) 7-Level, 7 Switches.This topology ismade of 7 switchesand 3 dc sources and is shown in Figure 3. One H-bridge present in the topology is mainly for polaritychange. Here, three switches conduct at a time forlevel generation. The switching scheme is given inTable 2.

(c) 7-Level, 6 Switches. This is a special configurationconsisting of four dc sources and six switches. Oneswitch across the load is used for zero level. S1, S2,S3 used for level generation and S4, S5 switchesfor polarity changing Figure 4 represent the 7-level6-switch topology and the corresponding switchingpattern is given in Table 3.

Page 3: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

ISRN Electronics 3

Table 1: Switching scheme for 7-level 9-switch topology.

SL no. 𝑆1

𝑆2

𝑆3

𝑆4

𝑆5

𝑆6

𝑆7

𝑆8

Output voltage1 ON ON ON OFF ON OFF ON OFF ON +Vdc2 ON ON OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF ON +2Vdc3 ON ON OFF OFF ON ON OFF ON OFF +3Vdc4 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF 05 OFF OFF ON ON OFF ON OFF ON OFF −Vdc6 OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF ON ON OFF −2Vdc7 OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF ON OFF ON −3Vdc

Table 2: Switching scheme for 7-level 7-switch topology.

SL no. 𝑆4

𝑆5

𝑆6

𝑆7

𝑆1

𝑆2

𝑆3

Output voltage1 ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF ON +Vdc2 ON ON OFF OFF OFF ON OFF +2Vdc3 ON ON OFF OFF ON OFF OFF +3Vdc4 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF 05 OFF OFF ON ON ON ON OFF −Vdc6 OFF OFF ON ON ON OFF ON −2Vdc7 OFF OFF ON ON OFF ON ON −3Vdc

Table 3: Switching scheme for 7-level 6-switch topology.

SL no. 𝑆1

𝑆2

𝑆3

𝑆4

𝑆5

𝑆6

Output voltage1 OFF OFF ON OFF ON OFF +Vdc2 OFF ON OFF OFF ON OFF +2Vdc3 ON OFF OFF OFF ON OFF +3Vdc4 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON 05 ON OFF OFF ON OFF OFF −Vdc6 OFF ON OFF ON OFF OFF −2Vdc7 OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF −3Vdc

Load

+

+

+

+

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

S4

S5S3

S2

S1

Figure 5: 7-level 5-switch proposed topology.

(3) Proposed Five-Switch Topology. The proposed 7 level MLIas shown in Figure 5 is about redesigning of existing 6-switchtopology eliminating 1 switch attaining the tag of 5 switchconfiguration.The circuit thus obtained is the simplest designcompared to conventional and all other existing topologies. Itconsists of four dc sources of 7 levels, for 9-level, 5 dc sourcesand so on.

Generalised expression for output voltage levels for thenew topology proposed is𝑚 = (2∗𝑛−3), where𝑚 = numberof output voltage levels, 𝑛 = number of switches𝑚 = (2 ∗ V −1), where V = number of dc sources.

The design of pulse generation circuit makes the topologydiffer from others so as to obtain the unique pulse patternto trigger the switches at the proper instant. Switches S1, S2,and S3 need to be compulsorily unidirectional or else theoutput waveform will get distorted. Reduced switches makethe circuit compact and user-friendly. Though the usage of4 dc sources for the generation of 7-level MLI results inless utilisation of sources, switch reduction benefits in lowswitching losses. No H-Bridge is used. Just 2 switches playthe role of polarity reversal. Table 4 represent the switchingscheme for the proposed topology.

Page 4: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

4 ISRN Electronics

+

Powergui

Discrete,

Series RLC branch

Scope4

Mosfet5

gm

DS

Mosfet4

gm

DS

Mosfet3

g m

D S

Mosfet2

g m

D S

Mosfet1

g m

D S

+

+

+

+

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

Vdc

s = 5e − 005 s.

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

Figure 6: Simulation diagram of proposed topology.

(a) PD PWM (b) POD PWM

(c) APOD PWM

Figure 7: Carrier alignment of carrier-based pwm techniques.

Page 5: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

ISRN Electronics 5

C6

C5

C4

C3

C2

C1

M

Or

And

AndNot

And

Not

Not

AndNot

Or

Or

Not

Not0

S3

S1

S2

S5

S4

Figure 8: PWM generation circuit.

Table 4: Switching scheme for proposed topology.

SL no. 𝑆1

𝑆2

𝑆3

𝑆4

𝑆5

Outputvoltage

1 OFF OFF ON OFF ON +Vdc2 OFF ON OFF OFF ON +2Vdc3 ON OFF OFF OFF ON +3Vdc4 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF 05 ON OFF OFF ON OFF −Vdc6 OFF ON OFF ON OFF −2Vdc7 OFF OFF ON ON OFF −3Vdc

2. Simulation Circuit

In the proposed 7-level MLI, the circuit is built of 5 mosfetunidirectional switches. It can also be built with 3 unidi-rectional and 2 bidirectional switches. The load is resistivewith a value of 10 ohms. Four 10-volt symmetric DC inputvoltages are used Figure 6 represent the simulation circuit ofthe proposed topology.

Note that in order to obtain the shaped 7-level outputwithout distortion, MOSFET block parameters in MATLABshould vary according to the load used. Here for 10 ohmresistive load, Mosfet block parameters are set as follows:

FET resistance = 0.01 ohms, internal diode resistance= 10 kilo ohms.

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04

0

10

20

30

−10

−20

−30

Figure 9: 7-level output of proposed topology.

3. Methodology

The pulse generation is essential in order to trigger theswitches with appropriate pulse pattern to produce thedesired 7-level output. It is inevitable to analyse which PWMsuits the new topology. The simplest PWM technique is thecarrier-based PWM (CBPWM) technique. It can be furthercategorised into level and phase shifting CBPWMs, respec-tively. Since the phase shifting CBPWMyields more harmon-ics comparatively, the level shifting CBPWM is preferred over

Page 6: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

6 ISRN Electronics

Table 5: THD content.

PWM techniqueSymmetric conventional

cascaded7-level mli (%)

Asymmetricconventional cascaded

7-level mli (%)

7-level,9 switches (%)

7-level,7 switches (%)

7-level,6 switches (%)

Proposed5-switch

7-level mli (%)PD 24.26 21.84 — — 18.08 18.07POD 23.13 20.22 28.3 14 16.15 16.12APOD 22.46 19.42 — — 18.52 18.40

Table 6: Voltage stress in proposed topology across switches.

Parameter ConventionalCMLI

9 switches,7-level

7 switches,7-level

6 switches,7-level

Proposed topology5 switches, 7-level

Voltage stress

5V 11 V (S5) 6V (S3) 3.33V (S3) 3.33V (S3)(All switches) 10V (S6) 6V (S2) 13.3 V (S2) 13.3 V (S2)

2V (S7)10V 18V (S1) 23.3 V (S1) 23.3 V (S1)

(S8 & S9)

Signal to analyze

FTT analysis

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 300.6, THD = 18.08%

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Mag

(% o

f fun

dam

enta

ls)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000Frequency (Hz)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycle

Figure 10: FFT analysis of existing 6-switch topology using PDpwm.

it. Therefore, the new circuit design is analysed with levelshifting carrier -based PWMs, that is, PD, POD, and APODPWMs. Interestingly, it is noted that POD gives lower THDand is found to be the apt PWM for proposed topology. ThePWM generation circuit is the heart of the circuitry. Onereference sine wave of amplitude 0.8 and frequency 50 Hertzis compared with C1 to C6 triangular carriers of frequency1 KHz. If m-level needs to be synthesised, (𝑚 − 1) carriersare required. Whenever the reference sinusoid exceeds the

Signal to analyze

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycleM

ag (%

of f

unda

men

tal) 8

6

4

2

0

Frequency (Hz)0 200 400 600 800 1000

FTT analysis

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 299, THD = 17.77%

Figure 11: FFT analysis of existing 6-switch topology using PODpwm.

carrier, instant pulses are generated to trigger the switch to0N state. Higher triangular carrier amplitude is taken as one.

The carrier alignment for the carrier based pwm tech-nique is shown in Figure 7. In PD or phase disposition tech-nique, (𝑚−1) carriers are aligned in the samedirection/phase.In POD or phase opposition disposition for 7-level, 6 carriersare aligned as symmetric mirror images above and below theZero reference axis. In alternate phase opposition disposition,alternate carriers are in the same phase and neighbouringcarriers in the opposing phase.

Page 7: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

ISRN Electronics 7

Signal to analyze

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycle

Mag

(% o

f fun

dam

enta

l)

6

4

5

2

3

0

1

Frequency (Hz)0 200 400 600 800 1000

FTT analysis

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 299.8, THD = 19.85%

Figure 12: FFT analysis of existing 6-switch topology using APOD pwm.

Signal to analyze

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycle

Mag

(% o

f fun

dam

enta

l) 2.5

1.5

2

0.5

1

0

Frequency (Hz)0 200 400 600 800 1000

FTT analysis

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 300.6, THD = 18.07%

Figure 13: FFT analysis of proposed topology using PD pwm.

Page 8: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

8 ISRN Electronics

Signal to analyze

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycle

Mag

(% o

f fun

dam

enta

l)

6

8

2

4

0

Frequency (Hz)0 200 400 600 800 1000

FTT analysis

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 299, THD = 16.12%

Figure 14: FFT analysis of proposed topology using POD pwm.

Signal to analyze

200100

0−100

−200

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04Time (s)

Selected signal: 2 cycles. FFT window (in red): 1 cycle

Mag

(% o

f fun

dam

enta

l)

5

6

2

1

4

3

0

Frequency (Hz)0 200 400 600 800 1000

FTT analysis

Fundamental (50 Hz) = 299.8, THD = 18.4%

Figure 15: FFT analysis of proposed topology using APOD pwm.

Page 9: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

ISRN Electronics 9

Table 7: Comparison of proposed 7-level mli with other mlis.

Inbuilt structure Flying capacitor Diodeclamped

Cascaded7-level

7-level,9 switches

7-level,7 switches

7-level,6 switches

Proposed7-level,

5 switchesNo. of capacitors 14 6 — — — — —No. of diodes — ≥8 — — — — —No. of switches 10 10 12 9 7 6 5∗

No. of dc sources — — 3 3 3 4 4∗

4. Pulse Generation Circuit

Thepulse generation circuit is given in Figure 8.The referencesignal comparing with carrier generating pulse which is thenmodified feeding to logic gates in order to get the requiredpattern to trigger the switches at the proper instant. Forexamples switche S

1needs to have a pulse so as to obtain

+Vdc and −3Vdc and S2requires +2Vdc and −2Vdc. S

3

conducts +3Vdc and −Vdc. Also, switches S5and S4conduct

positive and negative half cycles, respectively.

5. Simulation Results

See Figures 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, and Tables 5, 6, and 7.

6. Conclusion

The 7-level MLI using just 5 switches is successfully intro-duced simulating the circuitry using MATLAB/SIMULINKand observed a clear stepped 7-level waveform. It is foundthat the POD-PWM dominates all other PWMs in theproposed configuration. The new design is simple in itsoutlook with very few components. The novel 7-level mlihas lower THD compared to conventional symmetric andasymmetric topologies.

References

[1] J. Rodrıguez, J.-S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, “Multilevel inverters: asurvey of topologies, controls, and applications,” IEEE Transac-tions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724–738, 2002.

[2] D. Mohan and S. B. Kurub, “Performance analysis of SPWMcontrol strategies using 13 level cascaded MLI,” in IEEE Inter-national Conference on Advances in Engineering Science &Management (ICAESM ’12).

[3] O. L. Jimenez, R. A. Vargas, J. Aguayo, J. E. Arau, G. Vela, andA. Claudio, “THD in cascademultilevel inverter symmetric andasymmetric,” inProceedings of the IEEEElectronics, Robotics andAutomotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA ’11), pp. 289–295,November 2011.

[4] P. Palanivel and S. S. Dash, “Analysis of THD and output voltageperformance for cascaded multilevel inverter using carrierpulse widthmodulation techniques,” IET Power Electronics, vol.4, no. 8, pp. 951–958, 2011.

[5] J. J. Nedumgatt, D. Vijayakumar, A. Kirubakaran, and S.Umashankar, “A multilevel inverter with reduced number ofswitches,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Students’ Conference onElectrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS ’12), pp.1–4, March 2012.

[6] T. V. V. S. Lakshmi, N. George, S. Umashankar, and D. P.Kothari, “Cascaded seven level inverter with reduced number ofswitches using level shifting PWM technique,” in InternationalConference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC ’13), pp. 676–680, February 2013.

[7] R. A. Ahmed, S. Mekhilef, and H. W. Ping, “New multilevelinverter topology with minimum number of switches,” inProceedings of the 14th International Middle East Power SystemsConference (MEPCON ’10), pp. 1862–1867, Cairo University,Cairo, Egypt, December 2010.

[8] M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applica-tions, Prentice Hall, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2004.

Page 10: Research Article A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/476876.pdf · A New 7-Level Symmetric Multilevel Inverter with Minimum Number of Switches

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Modelling & Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of