research administrators’ network meeting · 2018. 8. 30. · making in michigan libraries...
TRANSCRIPT
Research Administrators’ Network Meeting AGENDA
February 28, 2017 2:00-4:00 p.m.
Michigan League Ballroom Webcast - http://orsp.umich.edu/ran-meeting-live-stream
Welcome & Introductions [2:00-2:10] Becky O’Brien, RAAC Communications Subcommittee Chair
Craig Reynolds, Director, ORSP, Guest Emcee
Professional Development Spotlight [2:10-2:20] Announcements: Professional Societies Updates, aiM Higher, Navigate
Makerspaces & Creative Thinking [2:20-2:55] Kristin Fontichiaro, School of Information
Presentation & Networking Activity
Break [2:55-3:05]
Updates [3:05-3:35] Sponsored Programs, Debbie Talley, Director, Sponsored Programs [3:05-3:15]
ITS, Cathy Handyside, Interim Assistant Director, ITS [3:15-3:25] Office of Research & Sponsored Projects, Craig Reynolds, Director, ORSP [3:25-3:35]
Sneak Peek of New U-M Deadline Policy [3:35-3:55] Craig Reynolds, Director, ORSP [3:35-3:55]
Closing Remarks [3:55-4:00]
____________________________________________________________________________________ RAN schedule for the rest of this Academic Year: http://orsp.umich.edu/ran
Ideas for a future meeting? Contact [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________________
Brought to you by the Research Administration Advisory Council (RAAC) Communications Subcommittee.
Research Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
Welcome!
Professional Development SpotlightResearch Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA) UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
Upcoming Meetings
● Region IV (Midwest) Annual Meeting
○ April 23-26, 2017, Madison, WI
● 59th National Annual Meeting
○ August 6-9, 2017, Washington, DC
Upcoming Traveling Workshops
● Financial Research Administration
● Fundamentals of Sponsored Project Administration
● Sponsored Project Administration, Level II○ May 22-24, 2017, Baltimore, MD
Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI) UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
SRAI Update
Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI)
● SRA Michigan Chapter Meeting will be held Friday, June 23, 2017 at the University of Michigan - Dearborn.○ The theme is: “From Carriage to Crossover: Cruising the Research
Administration Highway.”○ The meeting will include a networking mixer.○ Call for presentations will be sent shortly.○ This year, there will not be affiliate membership fees included in the
cost of registration for anyone who registered and attended last year.
● Contact Cathy Seay-Ostrowski ([email protected]) for more information.
SRAI Update
Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI)
● SRA Joint Southern / Midwest Section Meeting will be held May 7 - 10, 2017 in Nashville, Tennessee.○ The theme is: “Spirit of Nashville: Making Your Own Music in Research
Administration.”○ There is a contest to see which institution can bring in the most
attendees - a group from U-M will be carpooling to the meeting.
● Contact Heather Kraus ([email protected]) for more information.
National Organization of Research Development Professionals (NORDP) UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
NORDP Update
National Organization of Research Development Professionals (NORDP)
● The 9th Annual NORDP Conference is set for May 8-10, 2017; registration is now open.
● The conference will take place in Denver, Colorado.● Calls for proposals for panels and poster presentations will be announced
shortly.● Visit http://www.nordp.org/conferences for more information.
● U-M Research Development conference is currently in the planning stages (June 2017)
Professional Societies Information
National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA)
http://www.ncura.edu/
Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI)
http://srainternational.org/
National Organization of Research Development Professionals (NORDP)
http://www.nordp.org/
aiM Higher / CRA UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
February 28, 2017
aiM Higher / CRA UpdateaiM Higher / Certified Research Administrator (CRA)
● The latest cohort of the aiM Higher CRA Study Group is underway.● aiM Higher is highly recommended for those interested in taking the CRA
exam (administered by the Research Administrators Certification Council).● We would like to recognize those who recently completed certification or
were previously certified.Newly certified Previously certified
● Stacey Althouse● Carrie Disney● Teresa Herrick● Amy Holihan● Heidi Madias● Kimberly Mann
● Kristin Poole● Kristianne Rork● Scott Stanfill● Karen Szemak● Beth Talbot● Jeanine Tsang● Pat Turnbull
● Eve Bernos● Rolfe Carlson● Anita English● Sue Kelch● Jeff Longe● Danielle Smith● June Wilson
aiM Higher / CRA UpdateaiM Higher / Certified Research Administrator (CRA) Study Group
http://orsp.umich.edu/tools-resources/navigate-professional-development/aim-higher-cra-study-group
Research Administrator Certification Council
http://www.racc-cert.org/index.html
Navigate UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
David Mulder, Training ManagerFebruary 28, 2017
Navigate Update
Navigate - Training Priorities Survey
● In order to gauge training priorities, a survey will be sent via a Research Administration Post - Immediate Dispatch (RAPid).
● The survey will ask about the following:○ Potential faculty training topics○ Potential research administrator training topics○ Potential “lunch and learn” topics
● If you do not currently receive the RAP or RAPid e-mails, please sign up here: http://orsp.umich.edu/newsletter-signup.
Navigate Update
Questions? Ideas? Want to help?
Making in Michigan LibrariesResearch Administrators’ NetworkKristin Fontichiaro, Clinical Associate Professor, School of [email protected] | @activelearningFebruary 28, 2017
This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services RE-05-15-0021-15
Today
How I Got Here
Our Project
Our Findings
Our Prototype
tttt
ttttt
rasp
berr
ypi.o
rg
http
://th
irdce
ntur
y.um
ich.
edu/
mic
higa
n-m
aker
s/
http://makermedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2016-Make-Media-Kit-Final.pdf
PD Goals
Purposeful planning
Make cross-community connections
Sustainable, grounded, cost-effective practice more than drinking the Kool-Aid
Hands-on experimentation
In rural communities, we find …
Resourcefulness
Community coalescencence around traditional organizations (schools | churches | libraries)
FFA | 4-H (underrepresented in scholarly literature)
Balance between acknowledgement of tradition with excitement over future innovation
Extensive, if overlooked, craft knowledge
But in rural communities, we also find…
Downplaying “feminine” forms of making
Aging population
Bandwidth issues
Distance from & perception of universities
Closed factories; mono-industry communities
STEM goals with low STEM expertise, mismatched need
http
s://
ww
w.b
ls.g
ov/o
oh/f
aste
st-g
row
ing.
htm
PD vs. Deep Dive Sites: Exposure vs. Co-Creation
Cherry Lake Publishing:Makers as Innovators: (24 titles, 4 in press)Makers as Innovators Junior (16 titles in press)Teacher Librarian columnMakerspaces chapter in national LIS textbookCapitol Hill Maker Faire
Publishing and Output
How can we encourage divergent, creative, and innovative thinking at almost no cost?
Our Prototype
The As-Yet Untitled “Design Thinking Game”
http://imlsmaking.sites.uofmhosting.net/handbook/
The As-Yet Untitled “Design Thinking Game”
http://imlsmaking.sites.uofmhosting.net/handbook/
The As-Yet Untitled “Design Thinking Game”
http://imlsmaking.sites.uofmhosting.net/handbook/
Your Turn
Talk with your table.
Sketch or write your ideas. More ideas are better!
Choose your favorite.
Title your work.
Your Turn
Talk with your table. Ask what the needs of the user would be.Sketch or write your ideas.More ideas are better!Choose your favorite.Title your work.
Sponsored Programs UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
Debbie Talley, Director, Sponsored ProgramsFebruary 28, 2017
Financial closeout guide and checklistThese resources help the RA to successfully manage pre-closeout and financial closeout process.
Choose from one of two checklists. Both options reference a detailed Guide.
The Guide includes websites, phone numbers, and who to contact.
http://www.finance.umich.edu/programs/forms/SPPGCC
Financial closeout guide and checklist
Thanks again to...Anita English (formerly of the U-M Medical School) - Project Champion Meenu Baxendale (SNRE)Kristie Beckon (Sponsored Programs)Nichole Burnside (ISR)Kathy DeWitt (ORSP)Missy Denny (Sponsored Programs)Megan Diffin (Medical School)Rhonda Jent (College of Engineering)Charles Mattison (ISR)Anna Taylor (Dentistry)
Audits
NSF Data Analytics Audit - working with NSF audit resolution
Single Audit - ongoing
Personnel News
Staff moves to campus positions
Update on new staff
ITS UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
Cathy Handyside, Interim Assistant Director - ITS Research Administration SystemsFebruary 28, 2017
Overview
● Update on PM Performance
● eRPM Updates● SF424 – Completed Feb. 18, 2017● System Update – Completed Feb. 20, 2017
● eRPM Vendor Upgrade ● Planned for April/May
Update on PM Performance
● System Slowness during NIH deadline period● Continuing to work with vendor, Click/Huron
● Received fix for memory management issue
● Applied in late January
● Fix memory issue, but continued to observe contention issues
● Continued mitigation strategy of performing maintenance during business day to clear contention and restore acceptable performance
● Received several additional fixes for specific contention issues
eRPM Update – SF424
● Updates to Subaward Budget Forms
● Added support for the several Research & Related Subaward Budget Attachment(s)
● Improved NIH validation messages when required documents are missing.
eRPM System Update – February 20, 2017
● Updates to Proposal Approval Form (PAF)● Attestation language on the PI Sign PAF activity updated to include
language on PI responsibility for lab safety (if applicable). ● Resolved issue with display of investigators with no space required on
the PAF Summary● Resolved issue with Status Map on/off display
● Export Controls - Technology Control Plans now have an automated amendment process workflow.
eRPM System Update – February 20, 2017
New Sign PAF Language
eRPM Vendor Upgrade – April/May 2017
● Huron/Click Framework Portal Upgrade● Currently on version 6.1.3
● Planning two stage upgrade to version 8.0.2
● Upgrade to interim version – Weekend of March 31, 2017
● Limited user-facing changes
● Upgrade to version 8.0.2 – Weekend of May 5, 2017
● Updated user interface
● Updated Microsoft technology
Thank you!
Thank you for your time!
ORSP UpdateResearch Administrators’ Network
Craig Reynolds, Director, ORSPFebruary 28, 2017
ORSP Staff Update
New Smiling Faces!● Dan Garber, Assistant Project Rep., Private Sponsors Team
● Lizzie Howard, Administrative Assistant Associate
● Stephanie Stenberg, Assistant Project Rep., Private Sponsors Team
Old Smiling Faces in New Roles!● Ryan Lankton, Asst. Managing Project Rep., Government Sponsors Team
● Tony Nielsen, Asst. Managing Project Rep., Private Sponsors Team
● Patrick Woods, Asst. Managing Project Rep., Private Sponsors Team
Federal Update - Reducing Regulatory Burden
21st Century Cures Act (PL 114-255)● Establish Research Policies Board● Ease Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements● Create Federal-wide Conflict of Interest Policy● Review Animal Research Regulations
National Defense Authorization Act (PL 114-328)● Increase Micropurchase Threshold to $10K or higher
American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (PL 114-329)● Establish Interagency Working Group on Research Regulations● Increase Micropurchase Threshold to $10K or higher
Federal Update
Uniform Guidance● Micro-purchase threshold staying at $10K? Stay tuned!
Research Terms and Conditions● Still pending!
Final “Common Rule” on Protection of Human Subjects● Published in Federal Register, January 19, 2017
● Effective January 19, 2018 (cooperative research: January 20, 2020)
Federal Update
National Institutes of Health● FY17 NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Stipends (NOT-OD-003) ● New Grants Policy Statement (NOT-OD-021)● Revised SF424 R&R Application Guide (NOT-OD-023)● Final Research Performance Progress Report (NOT-OD-17-022)● Interim Research Performance Progress Report (NOT-OD-17-037)● New Limitation on Appendix Materials Policy (NOT-OD-17-035)● Updated Font Guidelines (NOT-OD-17-030)● Single IRB for Multi-Site Studies (NOT-OD-16-094)
○ Effective September 25, 2017
Federal Update
National Science Foundation
● Updated PAPPG effective Jan. 30, 2017
Department of Defense
● AFOSR intends to withhold funds when final reports delinquent
● Reminder: Separate IRB and IACUC approvals for new protocols and amendments to existing protocols
Sneak Peek of New U-M Deadline PolicyResearch Administrators’ Network
Craig Reynolds, Director, ORSPFebruary 28, 2017
What is ORSP’s current deadline policy?
● The deadline for submitting the Proposal Approval Form (PAF) and final proposal is four (4) business days in advance of the sponsor's deadline.
● ORSP’s policy is not enforced and is regularly ignored.
What will be the new policy?
● All PAFs and final proposal documents must be received in ORSP 3 business days ahead of the sponsor’s deadline, e.g.:
Sponsor Deadline Internal Deadline
5:00 PM ET, Friday, June 5 5:00 PM ET, Tuesday, June 2
12:00 PM ET, Friday, June 5 12:00 PM ET, Tuesday, June 2
8:00 PM ET, Friday, June 5 5:00 PM ET, Tuesday, June 2
5:00 PM ET, Monday, July 16 5:00 PM ET, Wednesday, July 11
What will be the new policy?
● PAFs/proposals not received by the internal deadline will not be submitted. However…
● PIs (or their delegates) may request an exception to the internal deadline of an additional business day in the event of exceptional circumstances
What will be the new policy?● Examples of Acceptable Exceptional Circumstances
● Unanticipated medical emergency of PI or an immediate family member● Natural disaster● Emergency closing of U-M due to severe weather● PI was notified by sponsor of funding opportunity less than X weeks
prior to the deadline
● Examples of Unacceptable Exceptional Circumstances● More time is needed to complete the proposal● Sub-contractor/sub-recipient documentation is late● Heavy teaching, patient care, or administrative responsibilities● Failure to complete required registrations in advance of the due date
What will be the new policy?
● Exceptions must be approved by the school/college/ institute and an ORSP Managing PR, whose approval is not guaranteed.
● Proposals granted an exception will not be submitted at the expense of other applicants for the same deadline who were timely.
Soliciting feedback...
Meeting Schedule✓ May 10, 2016 RAAC Executive Committee✓ June 14, 2016 RAAC Executive Committee✓ June 27, 2016 RAAC Faculty Advisory Council✓ Sept. 7, 2016 Jack Hu & UMOR Management Team✓ Sept. 12, 2016 RAAC Faculty Advisory Council✓ Sept. 30, 2016 Faculty Senate Research Policies Comm.✓ Oct. 12, 2016 Research Associate Deans✓ Oct. 18, 2016 RAAC Committee at Large
Soliciting feedback...
Meeting Schedule (continued)✓ Nov. 8, 2016 RAAC Executive Committee (update)✓ Nov. 9, 2016 Research Associate Deans (update)✓ Nov. 15, 2016 RAAC Committee at Large (update)✓ Feb. 15, 2017 Academic Programs Group✓ 2017 Faculty Senate Research Policies Comm.✓ 2017 Academic Programs Group✓ 2017 RAAC Executive Committee✓ 2017 RAAC Committee at Large
Rationale for a new policy
● The lack of a deadline policy is unfair to timely faculty. ● Late proposals risk not being submitted on time.● Late proposals risk being submitted without meeting
the sponsor’s requirements.● The explosion of sponsor-mandated proposal systems
increases the complexity of ORSP’s work and the time it takes to submit a proposal.
● Late proposals receive little-to-no compliance review.● The lack of a deadline policy is unfair to the ORSP staff.
What does ORSP do to enable proposal submission?
ORSP conducts a 42 point review . . .
See our PAF/Proposal Review Checklist at orsp.umich.edu/sites/default/files/orsp_paf_and_proposal
_checklist.pdf
How active are U-M faculty? (FY14-FY16)
Value of Proposals:
$4,757,807,340
Actual $ Awarded:
$1,248,815,919Proposals (7,247)
Unfunded agreements (983)
Awards (2,746)
Modifications (6,078)
JITs (685)Nearly 18,000 transactions
per year!
How do ORSP and the Med School* support the U-M research enterprise?
TRANSACTIONS / YR (FY16)
17,739 = TRANSACTIONS / HOUR
BUSINESS HOURS / YR
(FY16)
8.5
2,080
*The UMMS Grant Review and Analysis Office has delegated authority to submit Grants.gov proposals to NIH.
Rationale for a new policy● ORSP’s policy is not strictly enforced and regularly ignored.
● 25% of the 7,247 proposals in FY16 were routed or finalized within 0.41 business days of the deadline
On average, seven (7) proposals per day are not ready for submission until the day they are due! But averages can be deceiving...
Overall Proposal Lead Time in Business Days, FY2016:
Lower Quartile 0.41 Business Days
Average 3.19 Business Days
Median 1.51 Business Days
Upper Quartile 4.11 Business Days
Daily proposal submission spikes pose a challenge
The busiest months...
Daily proposal submission spikes pose a challenge
One Project Representative can be called upon to submit up to 25
proposals per day!
Maximum number of submissions per day per PR, by FY quarter.
Non-government sponsors are an increasingly frequent target
Non-government sponsors create greater variability and often require more time to review
Rationale for a new policy
ORSP staff are stressed and demoralized
High numbers of late proposals
High demand for quick turnaround times
High expectations for quality customer service
High numbers of grants/contracts to process
Very high levels of staff stress
Staff retention is a serious concern.
But in spite of it all...
ORSP staff still provide great service!
Overall Customer Satisfaction is consistently in the 90-95% range!
What have we done so far?
● All managers have taken Lean Office training to better understand ways to streamline work
● Government Team reorganized by department rather than sponsor
● Government Team PRs cross-trained to handle multiple sponsors
● Tool to assess workload equity implemented● Proposal/PAF review checklists created -- generic, NIH and NSF● Campus-wide proposal submission roles and responsibilities
matrix developed
Who has made a hard internal deadline policy work?
● Stanford Universityo 5 business days for admin shello 3 business days for final proposal
● University of Washingtono 7 business days for admin shello 3 business days for final proposal
● Harvard Universityo 5 business days for final proposal
● Yale Universityo 5 business days for final proposal
How will we implement the policy?
● Planning and design phase for eRPM and policy changes o In consultation with RAAC and with assistance of ITS o Schools/colleges/units given time to develop own deadline policies.
● An aggressive change management plan prior to the “go live” date, with job aids, newsletter articles, and presentations to stakeholders (e.g., Research Associate Deans, RAAC, schools/colleges, faculty groups).
● An 8-month “soft launch” prior to the “go live” dateo PIs informed if their proposal would not have met the internal deadline.
How will we implement the policy?
● Automated email notice in eRPM of internal deadline
● School/college/unit reporting on policy adherence
● As the “go live” date nears, stakeholders re-engaged through general and targeted communications
Closing Remarks
● Thanks to the RAAC Communications Subcommittee!
● Ideas for a future meeting? [email protected]
● Next RAN meeting is May, 17, 2017 from 2:00 - 3:30 pm in the League Ballroom.
○ UMOR Staff Recognition Awards program to follow.
A New ORSP Internal Deadline Policy81