report on the implementation of the enms according to iso ... · 5 twitter: @500001seaps...

Report on the implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001

February 2017

2

Twitter: @500001SEAPs www.500001seaps.eu

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001

Deliverable No. D5.2

Work Package 5

Dissemination Level RE

Author(s) EKODOMA

Co-author(s) All partners

Date February 2017

File Name D5.2_monitoring_EMS_50000&1.docx

This document (report, etc.) has been prepared in the framework of the European project

50000&1 SEAPs – Energy Management for Sustainable Action Plans (Grant agreement no.

IEE/XXXX) co-financed by the European Commission in the “Intelligent Energy – Europe”

(IEE) Programme.

CONTACT: Email: [email protected] Website: www.500001seaps.eu Twitter: @500001SEAPs

The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the

authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European

Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are

responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained

therein.

3



Executive summary

Even though the ISO 50001 initially was designed for industries, throughout the process of

energy planning in municipalities the need for systematic approach to reduce energy

consumption and CO2 emissions raised also in local authorities. The objective of the

50000&1SEAPs project was to integrate Sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in more

than 40 municipalities with energy management system (ISO 50001).

This report summarises the results of checking and monitoring the implementation of the

energy management system (EnMS) in the eight partner countries. According to the

requirements of ISO 50001, in the check phase municipality shall:

plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

periodically evaluate compliance;

manage non conformities, corrective measures and preventive measures;

control records;

plan and carry out internal audit of the EnMS;

review the EnMS.

As experience from 50000&1SEAPs show, in different countries and even in different

municipalities in the same country, there will be different motivators. Among main motivators

and reasons why more than 40 local authorities developed, implemented and also certified

their energy management systems and integrated them in their SEAPs are: regulatory

framework, possibility to reduce costs, chance to supervise and require contracted services,

possibility for systematic approach, data availability and personal interest.

In the meantime, there are still different barriers and challenges to overcome.

50000&1SEAPs consortium identified three kinds of barriers: first and most important –

human, then financial (though signalled by minor number of municipalities) and the third –

technical.

The first chapter of the report summarises in detail results and experience in implementation

of the EnMS from more than 40 municipalities in eight different EU countries. The second

chapter is dedicated to different best practice EnMS case studies in the eight countries.

4



Table of Content

Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 3

Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5

1 Development and implementation of EnMS in municipalities. Results ............................ 6

1.1 Summary on energy management systems in partner countries ............................. 6

1.2 Main motivators ....................................................................................................... 7

1.3 Barriers and challenges ........................................................................................... 8

1.4 Energy data monitoring ........................................................................................... 9

1.5 Energy targets of the EnMS .................................................................................. 10

1.6 Results from internal / certification audits .............................................................. 11

1.7 General observations and lessons learned ............................................................ 14

2 Best case studies ......................................................................................................... 17

2.1 Use of an online energy monitoring platform (Latvia)............................................. 17

2.2 Increasing awareness of people by visual effect (Romania) .................................. 18

2.3 Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (Italy) ........................................... 19

2.4 Optimising EnMS on public assets (France) .......................................................... 20

2.5 Municipal Fleet Renewal X (Spain) ........................................................................ 21

2.6 Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools (Greece) ............. 22

2.7 Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption (Poland) .................. 23

2.8 Installation of solar PVs (Bulgaria) ......................................................................... 24

Executive summaries in national languages ........................................................................ 25

5



Introduction

The introduction to ISO 50001 states that it “enables that organization to take a systematic

approach, in order to achieve continual improvement of energy performance, energy

efficiency and energy conservation”. The aim of ISO 50001 Standard is to support energy

reviews and to address measurable improvements of energy performances. The basic four

steps of PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle in relation to the ISO 50001 standard are shown in

the Figure 1.

Energy policy

Planning

Implementation and operation

Checking

Corrective and preventive action

Management review

Internal audit Monitoring and measurement

Continual improvement

Continual improvement

Figure 1: The approach of ISO 50001

Even though the ISO 50001 initially was designed for industries, throughout the process of

energy planning in municipalities the need for systematic approach to reduce energy

consumption and CO2 emissions raised also in local authorities. The objective of the

50000&1SEAPs project was to integrate Sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in more

than 40 municipalities with energy management system (ISO 50001).

This report summarises the results of checking and monitoring the implementation of the

energy management system (EnMS) in the eight partner countries. According to the

requirements of ISO 50001, in this phase municipality shall:

plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

periodically evaluate compliance;

6



manage non conformities, corrective measures and preventive measures;

control records;

plan and carry out internal audit of the EnMS;

review the EnMS.

1 Development and implementation of EnMS in municipalities. Results

1.1 Summary on energy management systems in partner countries

In total 34 municipalities, 1 conurbation with 17 cities, 1 joint city-conurbation with 22 cities

and federation of 11 municipalities successfully developed energy management system in

their municipalities. In the Table 1 are summarised results about the selected EnMS

boundaries and documentation, i.e. whether municipalities had manuals with procedures,

only procedures or only manual. In general municipality can select at least four different

sectors in their EnMS: public buildings, public lighting, public transport and/or public fleet.

Table 1: Summary on created energy management systems in eight EU countries

Country Number of LAs

developing EnMS Level of success

achieved EnMS boundaries Documentation

Bulgaria 5 (Bratsigovo,

Chepelare, Nedelino, Rudozem, Zlatograd)

Successful In 4 municipalities for selected public buildings. In 1 municipality – selected public buildings and street lighting

Manual together with procedures

France

1 city, 1 conurbation with 17 cities + 1 joint city-conurbation with

22 cities

Successful The most significant energy consumers - 10 to 20 buildings of various sorts

Only Manual

Greece

6 Municipalities (Metamorfosi,

Philothei-Psychiko, Papagou-Cholargou,

Alimos, Lavreotiki, Irakleio)

Partly successful

All municipal consumptions (buildings, cars, public lighting, facilities) in 5 municipalities and in 1 municipality municipal fleet


Italy 3 Municipalities + 1

Federation of 11 Municipalities

Successful

For 3 municipalities and also Federation of municipalities - public buildings and public lighting system, however in case of the Federation the certification concerns the support in monitoring and improving energy performance of the 11 Municipalities

Procedures only

Latvia 5 (Ādaži, Daugavpils,

Cēsis, Smiltene, Sigulda)

Successful In 4 municipalities: all public buildings and public lighting; in the 5

th - also public

transport


Poland 6 municiplities

(Grybów, Pilzno, Słupsk, Sztum,

The process turned out to be more time

consuming than

For selected public buildings; in two municipalities also public street lighting

7



Zarszyn, Żyraków) initially planned

Romania

6 (Lugoj, Resita, Ineu, Sannicolau Mare, Faget and Otelu

Rosu)

Different results were achieved: in

some municipalities very successful, in

some less

Main public building in each municipality Manual together with procedures

Spain 2 (Carballiño, Xinzo

de Limia) Successful

Urban waste management (including public waster infrastructure)

Procedures only

Integrating EEA and EnMS: experience from France

The European Energy Award (EEA) supports some 1400 municipalities willing to contribute to sustainable energy policy and urban development through the rational use of energy and increased use of renewable energies. EEA is a tool for energy policy quality management for municipalities and local authorities (LAs) taking all energy related policies into account on the given territory. EEA addresses the entire territory and is therefore overlapping SEAP / SECAP scope. France is one of the Ordinary members of the EEA.

The constitution of an EnMS system worked seamlessly for French LAs because the ones associated to the project had a certain maturity in energy management and the will to take it to a higher level. This was concertized in the constitution of EnMS manuals in all LAs which allowed LAs to institutionalise their actions rigorously within the ISO 50001 framework.

The EnMS was built upon LAs' organisations and procedures and in some cases, upon the ones of the facility management subcontractors' procedures. It covers generally the way LAs manage energy with particular focus on significant buildings and facilities. LAs assets may count numerous and different types of facilities, e.g. schools, administrations, association buildings, sports complexes, swimming pools, etc. Therefore it is not a multi-venue procedure where same procedures apply on all buildings.

The choice of the most significant energy consumptions in France was driven by following principles:

Largest energy consumers (the EnMS covers from 50% to 80% of LAs energy consumption when integrating the top 10 or top 20 facilities).

Facilities significant of their type (e.g. one large school) offering a potential of enlarging the EnMS scope progressively to similar buildings.

Significant consumptions besides buildings, such as LAs fleet fuel consumption and public lighting.

1.2 Main motivators

In different countries and even in different municipalities in the same country, there will be

different motivators. Below are summarised the main motivators and reasons why local

authorities developed, implemented and also certified their energy management systems and

integrated them in their SEAPs.

8



Figure 2: Main groups of motivators of implementation of EnMS in municipalities

1.3 Barriers and challenges

Only few involved parties, including municipalities initially had a clear perception of energy

management system and integration of it in the local SEAPs. Therefore one of the initial

challenges for part of technical partners of 50000&1SEAPs project was to overcome it and

gather the general knowledge on the concept.

It was clear that there will be different barriers and challenges during the process of creation

and implementation of EnMS in local municipalities. Some of them were already well known

before like energy data gathering, assigning responsibilities. Also in this case, one of the

main barriers and challenges were of human nature.

The other group of barriers are still financial (though

signalled by minor number of municipalities) and the

third – technical.

In general throughout the whole process all these

barriers most of municipalities managed to

overcome. The most significant challenges at

different stages of the process were:

Human:

o Lack of municipal energy managers at

the beginning of the process;

Legislation: Provisions in the national legislation, e.g. towards EnMS in local authorities or use of white certificates

Knowledge and assistance: Technical assistance from project partners to create EnMS in LAs

Cost reduction: Recognition of the effort for minimization of energy consumption and related cost

Supervision: Control over different contractors

Systematic approach: for evaluation of projects, tenders and procurements

Persons: member of the City Council, member of the technical department of the LA, energy manager

Data availability: Possibility to have qualitative data

9



o Identification of the “right” energy manager throughout the process;

o Significant amount of other duties of the personnel involved in the EnMS

development process, which made it hard for them to focus on the task;

o Lack of competences as well as old mentality; need for significant training of

the personnel;

o Political restless, bureaucracy in LAs as well as lower priority than other

activities in LA;

o Cooperation and coordination among departments;

o Certification bodies have a hard time understanding it is no multi-site

procedure (see more in the box below);

o During implementation additional limitation came from the cross departmental communication barrier and avoidance of leadership/responsibility assumptions of some key responsible people.

Financial:

o Lack of own financial opportunities to implement and maintain the EnMS

o Lack of funds for the EnMS certification and renewing the certificate in the

future.

Technical:

o Scarce availability of initial energy consumption data, methodological

approach in data collection and data management at the initial part of the

process;

o Definition of the significant energy uses, definition of the energy measures

priority.

The ISO 50001 certification raised several issues:

The certification bodies and advisors are familiar with industrial facilities and with multi-site (e.g. supermarket chains) certifications but had a hard time in understanding of the scope and procedures in the municipalities. In some countries this led to high certification costs because the certification bodies insisted to inspect all facilities, which could not be accepted.

Some municipalities applied for an alternative financing scheme for its certification, e.g. Lorient (France) used an initiative called Pro SMEn (supported by ATEE – energy association) based on white certificates (Utilities subsidise by reducing energy bills in exchange for white certificates).

The certification bodies were inconsistent as to scope & cost of the certification (including on proposals from one certification body). In some countries, e.g. France, Latvia standardisation organisations act as certificatory bodies and a consultant on ISO, hence causing a certain amount of confusion.

1.4 Energy data monitoring

According to the ISO 50001 standard, municipalities have to ensure monitoring,

measurement and analysis of the energy performance of their selected EnMS boundaries at

certain intervals. It means that municipalities have to identify significant energy uses,

variables, and energy performance indicators as well as assess effectiveness of the selected

actions.

10



An important aspect during establishment of the EnMS is to ensure appropriate frequency of

energy consumption data monitoring in order to take action and assess the result of it. Figure

3 summarises current practices regarding data collection availability and frequency. In more

than half of the countries, energy consumption data in municipalities are collected on

quarterly basis. In France, Latvia and Poland energy data are gathered on monthly basis.

Latvia: monthly

Poland: monthly

France: monthly

Romania: quaterly

Italy: quaterly

Spain: quaterly

Bulgaria: quaterly

Greece: quaterly

Figure 3: Energy consumption data collection practice in eight partner countries

1.5 Energy targets of the EnMS

Usually annual energy targets are set in the energy management. These are quantifiable

energy performance requirements and are set to achieve energy objectives of the

municipality. In the meantime, energy objective is outcome or achievement set to meet

energy policy of the municipality that is integrated and explained in the SEAPs of the

municipalities. Table 2 summarises energy targets or objectives as well as planned energy

savings in the first year of the EnMS.

Table 2: First year energy targets/energy objectives and planned energy savings

Country Energy targets/energy objectives Planned savings achieved in

municipalities

Bulgaria 20% reduction in emissions

France Reduce energy consumption by 5 to 10% Reduce energy consumption by 5 to

10%

11



Greece Energy and economic savings, support to the SEAP, 5% reduction in energy consumption originally, better understanding of energy use

5-10% reduction in energy consumption (higher in SEAP), but not

yet achieved

Italy

Establish and introduce a specific methodology about energy use, energy performance and improvement opportunities in the LAs making sure that the energy aspects enter in the LAs planning.

Our target is about 10% of energy saving in LAs Buildings, facilities and

infrastructures.

Latvia Creation and implementation of the EnMS; 5-10% of the savings in public buildings

5-10% of energy savings in 10 most consuming public buildings

Poland

Improvement of the energy performance of the municipality in order to ensure its sustainable energy development and energy security. More detailed objectives include:

Rationalization of energy consumption in municipal buildings,

Purchase of EE goods and services,

Increase of RES use and EE in buildings' construction,

Ensuring land use planning considering the aspect of energy security,

Good cooperation with energy suppliers,

Increase of public lighting efficiency,

Promotion of EE and RES use among inhabitants

We assume 2-5% savings within EnMS boundaries

Romania

To have external Certification audit in April-May 2017, and successful pass of it with all 6 municipalities (Resita, Lugoj, Ineu, Sannicolau Mare, Faget and Otelu Rosu)

Cannot be quantified at this moment it is too early

Spain The target are economic savings and environmental savings

20% in 4 years

1.6 Results from internal / certification audits

One of the final steps before certification process is implementation of the internal audit. It is

systematic and also independent assessment process to evaluate objectively the efficiency

of the EnMS. It is performed annually. During the 50000&1SEAPs project almost all the

municipalities have finalised their first internal audits in their municipalities. Table 3

summarises the main information about the main outcomes of the internal audits and

recommendations. In case municipality already certified their EnMS, recommendations from

the certification audits are presented.

Table 3: Results of internal or certification audits

Country

Number municipalities with

internal/certification audit

What kind of non-conformities (if any)

What kind of recommendations from internal/certification audits

Bulgaria 5 1. Municipality of

Bratsigovo – lack of control over supplies

1. Municipality of Bratsigovo It is recommended diaries for operation of

boilers and fuel consummation (pellets) to have

12



of energy consumables (pellets)

2. Municipality of Nedelino - lack of control over supplies of energy consumables (pellets)

3. Municipality of Zlatograd - lack of control over supplies of energy consumables (pellets)

4. Municipality of Rudozem – lack of control over the accuracy of the meters

a single form. it is advisable to extend the EnMS to include all

street lighting and transport it is advisable to spread the policies and

objectives of the municipality energy to population

2. Municipality of Nedelino

It would be helpful maintenance worker to have a higher degree in electrical safety

The scheduling of verification of energy machines would improve the maintenance and inspection for leaks of refrigerant.

Loading of wood pellets in the hopper of the boiler in kindergarten may be easier if use an appropriate higher platform.

3. Municipality of Zlatograd It would be helpful for achieving the targets of

EnMS to apply incoming control of wooden pellets for checking their compliance with the declared indicators

Providing rapid communication between stoker and management would help better surveillance and response in case of need.

4. Municipality of Rudozem It is desirable to improve the conditions of the

boiler room in the kindergarten - cemented floors and removal of unnecessary lighting.

Advanced activities for creating opportunities for the use of renewable energy - geothermal heat, electricity production from pressure plumbing, solar collectors for hot water.

5. Municipality of Chepelare It is recommended to improve order in the

boiler room of the polyclinic building It is advisable to require from suppliers of wood

pellets that all packaging will be labelled. Electric water heater 100 L in the children's

center can be set to run outside the hours of expensive energy

it is advisable to share experiences between the stoker to influence the parameters of the combustion process on the fuel pellets.

France

1 LA 1 joint city and LA 1 internal pending

certification

Mainly on legal requirement & their

evaluation Reinforcement of internal organisation

Greece 4

Metamorfosi: No non-conformities Philothei-Psychiko Minor nonconformities and improvement opportunities were listed in Internal Audit Papagou-Cholargou (for Municipal Fleet only) Minor nonconformities and improvement opportunities were listed in Internal Audit Lavreotiki (for Keratea Unit only) Energy team is not

Reinforcement of internal organization is needed in all municipalities and a timeframe should be set clearly for all procedures. Also clear criteria should be set for energy services, products and equipment. In three municipalities ipdate and control should be made with all recent legal documents and a time period for checking compliance should be specified Metamorfosi

A time period for checking compliance with legislation documents should be specified

The energy targets should be more clearly specified at a yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and updating energy aspects should be specified

The EnMS policy etc. should be externally communicated, and date for local forum should be set

Philothei-Psychiko

The energy targets should be clearly specified at a

13



operational (changes in personnel) and roles not clearly assigned Minor nonconformities and improvement opportunities were listed in Internal Audit

yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and updating energy aspects should be specified

Internal communication to all departments and employees should be enhanced

Energy data gathering for at least 2016 should be finanlised and completed

Papagou-Cholargou

The energy targets should be specified at a yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and updating energy aspects should be specified

Lavreotiki

Energy team should be re-established and roles specified

The energy targets should be specified at a yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and updating energy aspects should be specified

Internal communication to all departments and employees should be enhanced

Energy data gathering for at least 2016 should be finanlised and completed.

Italy 3

Montecchio Maggiore: absence of Energy performance certificate in all Public Buildings (Legal requirement); Montecchio Maggiore: Internal and external communication of the Energy Policy to personnel, citizens and stakeholders; Marostica: absence of Energy performance certificate in 5 Public Buildings (Legal requirement); Marostica: verify the Certificates of instruments calibration of the Heat contractor company; Analyze and double check the services provided by the Heat contractor company in respecting the condition of the Contract in particular concerning the quality of the Energy Audit on Public Buildings included in the contract

1. Montecchio Maggiore: a public tender for private certified energy expert has been launched performing all the Public Buildings Certificate and exposing them as requested by the National Law;

2. Montecchio Maggiore: Energy Policy published in the website of the Municipality, sent by email to all the personnel of the Municipality and posted on the walls of the Municipal Hall and in the Buildings managed by the Municipality;

3. Marostica: a public tender for private certified energy expert has been launched performing the 5 Public Buildings Certificate and exposing them as requested by the National Law;

4. Marostica: Certificates of the instruments calibration requested to the Heat contractor company, validity verified;

5. Heat management contract analyzed, Energy Audit analyzed and revised by the company, mistakes and errors have been corrected and reported, energy performances have been revised and updated.

Latvia 1 certified

3 with internal audits No non-conformities

City for Daugavpils (certification audit):

At the building level – reporting in heat substations; suggestions for different small scale measures

Other municipalities (internal audits):

Practical implementation of some of the procedures

Lack of approved documentation in some cases

Definition of EnMS as well as assignment of more concrete roles and responsibilities in the contracts with some of the service providers

14



Romania

6 internal audits

First precertification visit was handling in

February 2017

Minor nonconformities and improvement

opportunities were listed in each Internal Audit

Reports

Internal audit report recommendations went to the following nonconformities identified: -No Legal requirements register with applicable norms and specific requirements were identified -Energy manager nomination was missing in one Municipality team Lugoj -Adaptation and implementation of some procedures were missing in some cases, such as green procurement (Resita and Lugoj) -Management review was not performed at the date of the audits Many of these recommendations were very fast implemented with denkstatt & AMET support as well as local resource allocation. An insight EnMS Manual was delivered to whole municipalities in order to assure an internal transfer if information’s for all positions. More visibilities on results can be found on Internal System audit reports for each individual municipality. For all these 6 municipalities precertification visits were started during the project life (February 2017), performed by one of the future Certification team members (Mrs. Iulia Petrea). The certification audit was scheduled for all 6 municipalities on the period April - May 2017. The certification body already submitted to AMET a first draft of audit schedule.

1.7 General observations and lessons learned

During the 50000&1SEAPs, considerable knowledge and lessons learned have been

achieved:

It takes much longer time that creation of SEAPs; employees should be trained about the

matter; lack of clear monitoring guidelines.

Quite easy to implement when it is back to back on subcontractor's EnMS.

EnMS ensures proper monitoring.

Formalisation not sufficiently mature. Little possibility to expand EnMS to SEAPs and in

all cases not certifiable.

Benchmarking and change experience with other LAs.

Competences of internal team members are essential.

Keeping together the internal team and changing trough the time is mandatory.

Internal management training is essential for local municipality staff.

Acknowledgement on all level of the energy policy and empowering the follow up.

Establish an EnMS in LAs is a pioneering experience. Usually Italian LAs don't use to

establish energy performance, monitoring energy consumption and establish a

continuous improvement. The main challenge is establish a permanent energy team

really and fully focused on the continuous monitoring and improvement and at the same

time provide evidences on the energy improvement to the LAs political staff.

Useful to have an experienced consulting organization that deals with the ISO standards

development process and prepares all necessary documentation.

15



Creation of an EnMS turned out to be a bit more time consuming and complicated than

initially expected, especially for those municipalities who had to start from the scratch (i.e.

didn't have any initial data on energy consumption in their buildings & facilities, didn't

have energy managers and weren't working much in the energy field before).

Still, it is really worth a while to develop such a system as it helps to precisely determine

municipality's initial energy situation and to define procedures for constant improvement

and efficient monitoring of this improvement. Thanks to that it will be easier in the future

to implement any new, energy-related strategies and actions.

It is good to combine the EnMS with other management systems following ISO (e.g.

QMS following ISO 9001 or EMS following ISO 140001). The rules for implementing

them are similar and the synergy effect will allow for further optimisation of municipal

processes.

It is important to ensure sufficient promotion of the EnMS developed and implemented in

the municipality to give good example to the citizens and local stakeholders and to

encourage them to contribute to the achievement of local energy targets (e.g. established

in a SEAP).

There is a will, but enforcement is difficult due to lack of manpower and financial and

organisational issues.

There is need to train to use energy monitoring system and how to prioritise actions etc.

Municipalities who are participating in the Project activities in Italy started to analyse and

report information about energy consumption and energy performance basically together

with the project activities. In general they are approaching the energy issues with specific

targets and methodology in the last two years.

Another important lesson learned is about the boundaries: in several cases, certifiers do

not understand the complexities of the energy use in a Local Authority. Very often

Certifiers focus their attention on the final users of the Public Buildings strictly applying

the requirement 4.3.3 b) of the ISO 50001 excluding for that reason the Schools from the

list of the Buildings under certification process.

Implementing ISO 50001 was beneficial to LAs allowing them to cross-check that all

obligations were met and that energy management was effective. It took the issue one

step further including for cities that are EEA awardees (such as Lorient who felt the need

to implement ISO).

The development of the ISO50001 system resulted in a good understanding of the

factors affecting the energy consumption in all municipalities. Even though the data

collection process has been very long, this understanding has become a key issue in

further developing actions, allocating resources and setting priorities with respect to

energy. Even the difficulties in collecting data turned out to be a significant “lesson” for

municipality officials.

The municipalities had a general interest and variable commitments to sustainable

energy. The setting up of the energy management system has broadened the

understanding of the sustainable energy design and management process. The

16



combination of efforts, teams and support for the SEAP and the EnMS development was

the key success factor to this.

The Energy Management System can be a tool for the development of the SEAP,

nevertheless, the commitment to the CoM SEAP was initiated Mayors’ commitment for

the manpower required to set the system.

The good practice transferred by the certified municipality (Likovrisi-Pefki) to the others in

the initial training phase, the political support of the Association for Sustainable

Development of Cities, and the technical support provided by CRES were factors that

helped from the initial decision to the final implementation phase.

The adaptation of the procedures to the organizational operation of the municipalities is

something new and difficult, due to the number of departments, sectors and procedures

and people involved.

The setting up of the ISO50001 procedures has proven to be far more time consuming

than expected, even in municipalities with strong commitment from the beginning. This is

due to complexity of internal organization and cooperation among departments, lack of

manpower, and also lack of prior experience. The definition of roles and responsibilities

within the energy management teams has also been complex and time consuming.

The data collection required for the ISO50001 process, due to the quality and continuity

of the data required is very time consuming, the availability of data was unclear in the

beginning and the data collection process was a very difficult procedure.

The time constraints and limited human resources led two municipalities to the decision

to limit the boundaries of initial certification, even though their aim is to implement it to all

municipal activities.

The development of the system is vulnerable to changes both at the Top Management

and also inside the energy team. As this often occurs in municipalities, initial effort for

ensuring continuity should be set at the initial stages of the development of the system,

but this is generally unresolved, providing uncertainty in the final outcome.

The geographic and organisational dispersion within the one of the municipalities

(Lavreotiki) was an additional barrier.

17



2 Best case studies

2.1 Use of an online energy monitoring platform (Latvia)

Action heading Tender for online energy monitoring system

Municipality Daugavpils

Country Latvia

CoM signatory Yes

Works duration 1 month

Total Investment (€) 3,823.00

Description of activities

In order to ensure continuous energy monitoring of the whole system, municipality developed an Excel spread sheets for energy manager. However, use of the Excel file didn't ensure involvement of the main stakeholders and users of the infrastructure. Therefore municipality decided to tender for an online energy monitoring system to obtain a platform for monthly data collection and analysis. Platform is developed by Ekodoma and available online (www.energoplanosana.lv)

Financing scheme As this is measure with small investments, municipality used its own funding

Expected qualitative results

This activity has qualitative results as it ensures monthly energy data collection for municipal buildings, street lighting and also public transport and municipal fleet. It ensures that all persons involved, i.e. energy manager of the municipality, technical personnel in the public buildings, as well as technicians of the public lighting company etc. have direct access to the database and are able to analyse energy consumption against energy performance indicators and take further action. The system allows to reduce the time for data collections, ensures continuous update for decision makers etc.

Expected quantitative results

It is forecasted that the use of the online energy system will ensure at least 3% of energy consumption and CO2 emissions

Energy savings (MWh/year)

542

CO2 emissions cut (tCO2/year)

127

Project status Municipality initiated the use of the system in January 2017

Entity/ies undertaking the activities

Energy manager, technical personnel in public buildings; technician at the public street lighting department; energy manager at the public transport company, vice-mayor

18



2.2 Increasing awareness of people by visual effect (Romania)

Action heading Increasing awareness of people by visual effect

Municipality All municipalities involved

Country Romania

CoM signatory yes

Works duration 1 day/municipality, 3 day denkstatt

Total Investment (€) 2370 Euro


Develop posters to be displayed near electrical equipment consumers

Financing scheme local funds


Increase the awareness of Municipalities servants and population regarding energy consumptions and its sources. The learnings will be applied at home, too.


2% of electrical consumption reduction


4.4 MWh/year (all 6 municipalities)


2 t CO2/year (all 6 municipalities)

RES used (MWh/year)

0.00

Project status finalised


Municipalities’ buildings. Could be distributed in schools and hospitals, too

19



2.3 Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (Italy)

Action heading Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (SEAP Action n.11)

Municipality Pordenone

Country Italy

CoM signatory yes

Works duration 2 years

Total Investment (€) 3,020,000.00


Pordenone Municipality planned several Energy Audit on its Public Building in order to decide where energy efficiency measures will be implemented in order to improve the Public Buildings energy performance

Financing scheme Own funds; third party financing; National financial Scheme (Conto termico)

Expected qualitative results Improve the energy performance of the Public Buildings


30 Buildings involved in the Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency measures

Energy savings (MWh/year) 1,368.00

CO2 emissions cut (tCO2/year) 276.00

RES used (MWh/year) 0.00

Project status (building permits, procurement, contracts, works status)

Planning specific technical projects on energy efficiency measures starting from the Energy Audit already done


LG; SOGESCA; Cofely

20



2.4 Optimising EnMS on public assets (France)

Action heading Optimising EnMS on public assets

Municipality Tours Plus and all municipalities involved

Country France

CoM signatory Yes


Total Investment (€) 100 000


The LA of Tours Plus and the municipality of Tours plan to :

Reduce energy consumption of their own assets (EE studies on behaviour and triggering works)

Participate to EE studies done by municipalities in the conurbation of Tours Plus on their municipal assets

Put in place an energy counsellor for all municipalities

Financing scheme Local funds


The actions will allow identifying the possibilities of consumption reduction as well as necessary refurbishment works. An advisory activity supported by the LA will be beneficial to the municipalities and will allow to increase consciousness and skills


20% of energy consumption reduction


55 600


0.00

RES used (MWh/year)

0.00


On-going


Tours Plus

21



2.5 Municipal Fleet Renewal X (Spain)

Action heading Municipal Fleet Renewal X

Municipality Xinzo

Country Spain

CoM signatory Yes

Works duration

Total Investment (€) 137,000.00


Financing scheme



Energy savings (MWh/year) 29.65

CO2 emissions cut (tCO2/year) 3.00

RES used (MWh/year) 0.00

Project status


22



2.6 Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools (Greece)

Action heading Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools

Municipality Papagou-Cholargou

Country Greece

CoM signatory Yes

Works duration 2017-2019

Total Investment (€) 150.000


Activities include the installation of metering systems and sensors aiming at the constant monitoring of energy consumption at real time and applies to existing children’s and infants day care centres and school buildings, including the ongoing project of energy refurbishment of the 1

st Lyceum (last level high

school) of Cholargos, financed by the Region of Attica. This project is complementary to the activities for energy upgrading, efficiency and energy saving of Municipal infrastructures, included in the Municipality Operational Programme 2015-2019

Financing scheme

The Municipality is seeking funding through the Structural Funds Programme NSRF 2014-2020, “Improvement of access to Information and Communication Technologies, their use and quality” and/or “Supporting the transition to a low carbon economy in all sectors’’, but alternatively, will use own funds.


Energy savings will be produced through the proper use of all the energy systems, coupled with the Energy Management procedures developed in the Municipality. Improved comfort and living conditions will also be achieved. All employees, as well as school pupils will be sensitised on the energy consumption issues and energy efficient use of all building systems (operation of windows, thermostat settings, shading, heating systems etc.). The educational and dissemination aspect to the citizens is also expected to be high.


Energy and CO2 savings described below.


71,00


61,00

RES used (MWh/year)

0.00


The project is at the planning stage, and is expected to be launched in 2017 or 2018.


Municipality

23



2.7 Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption (Poland)

Action heading Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption

Municipality Grybów

Country Poland

CoM signatory YES

Works duration since 2015

Total Investment (€) 0.00


In 2015 Grybów launched monitoring of media consumption (including electricity, natural gas and water) in all public buildings and of electricity consumption for street lighting purposes. Monitoring data are provided by energy distributors and supplier and are used to optimise this consumption and to quickly react to any system failures. Through simple actions, like turning off unused monitors, multi-function devices and printers or turning off unnecessary lights, the municipality already managed to reduce its energy demand by approx. 10% compared to 2015.

Financing scheme LG budget


Increasing energy awareness of public buildings' employees


Reducing energy consumption by approx. 10%


3.00


2.4

RES used (MWh/year)

0.00


Implementation of the system has been completed and first results of its operation are already known.


Municipality of Grybów and its relevant organisational units

24



2.8 Installation of solar PVs (Bulgaria)

Action heading Installation for electricity generation up to 30 KW

Municipality Bratsigovo Municipality

Country Bulgaria

CoM signatory Yes


Total Investment (€) 41 976


Photovoltaic installation on the roof of the hospital building in Bratsigovo Municipality /30 kW/.

Financing scheme LG Budget


The polyclinic building, as the largest municipal buildings’ consumer of electricity, is a very good source of RES being used not only for its own needs, but also with the purpose to sale the excess electricity being transformed into the transmission power grid to EVN.


Photovoltaic modules 250 Wp polycrystalline 60 cells COP 15.29% for electricity generation up to 30 kW.


24


0.39

RES used (MWh/year)

22.472


The installation is on the roof of the Polyclinic building, located in UPI VII-Hospital, district 31 of the town of Bratsigovo with administrative address: 35 Treti Mart Blvd. The location of the terrain is suitable for installation of photovoltaic facilities in terms of orientation towards the sun and existing electricity and transport infrastructure.


Bratsigovo Municipality

25



Executive summaries in national languages

Kopsavilkums

Neskatoties uz to, ka ISO 50001 sākotnēji tika veidots industrijām, pašvaldību enerģētikas

plānošanas procesa laikā radās vajadzība pēc sistemātiskas pieejas enerģijas patēriņa un

CO2 emisiju samazināšanai arī vietējās pašvaldībās. Projekta 50000&SEAPs mērķis bija

integrēt energopārvaldības sistēmu, balstoties uz ISO 50001, ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas

rīcības plānos vairāk kā 40 pašvaldībās.

Šis ziņojums apkopo energopārvaldības sistēmas ieviešanas pārbaužu un monitoringa

rezultātus astoņās partnervalstīs. Saskaņā ar ISO 50001 prasībām, pārbaudes fāzē

pašvaldība veic:

Plāno un veic pienācīgu uzraudzību un mērīšanu;

Regulāri izvērtē attīstību;

Pārvalda neatbilstības, koriģē pasākumus un preventīvos pasākumus;

Veic kontroles ierakstus;

Plāno un veic iekšējo energopārvaldības sistēmas auditu;

Pārskata energopārvaldības sistēmu.

Kā 50000&1SEAPs projekta pieredze rāda, dažādās valstīs un pat dažādās pašvaldībās

vienā valstī var būt pilnīgi atšķirīgi motivācijas iemesli. Starp galvenajiem motivatoriem un

iemesliem, kāpēc vairāk kā 40 vietējās pašvaldības izveidoja, ieviesa un sertificēja savas

energopārvaldības sistēmas un integrēja tās savos ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas rīcības plānos ir

– normatīvais regulējums, iespēja samazināt izmaksas, iespēja uzraudzīt un pieprasīt

nolīgtos pakalpojumus, iespēja sistemātiskai pieejai, datu pieejamība un personiskās

intereses.

Tajā pašā laikā, joprojām ir arī dažādi šķēršļi un izaicinājumi, kas jāpārvar. 50000&1SEAPs

konsorcijs identificēja trīs veidu šķēršļus: pirmais un svarīgākais – cilvēks, tad finansiālais

(tomēr par šo ziņoja mazs skaits pašvaldību) un trešais – tehniskais.

Pirmā ziņojuma daļa apkopo detalizētu informāciju par rezultātiem un energopārvaldības

sistēmas ieviešanas pieredzi vairāk kā 40 dažādās pašvaldībās, astoņās ES valstīs. Otrā

ziņojuma daļa ir veltīta dažādiem labās prakses piemēru izpētei astoņās valstīs.

26



Resumen ejecutivo

A pesar de que la ISO 50001 fue diseñada inicialmente para industrias, a lo largo del

proceso de planificación energética en los municipios, la necesidad de un enfoque

sistemático para reducir el consumo de energía y las emisiones de CO2 planteadas también

aparició en las autoridades locales. El objetivo del proyecto 50000&1SEAPs ha sido integrar

Planes de Acción de Energía Sostenible (PAES) en más de 40 municipios con sistema de

gestión de energía (ISO 50001).

En este informe se resumen los resultados de la comprobación y el seguimiento de la

aplicación del sistema de gestión energética (SGE) en los ocho países socios. De acuerdo

con los requisitos de ISO 50001, en la fase de verificación el municipio deberá:

planificar y llevar a cabo un seguimiento y una medición adecuados;

evaluar periódicamente el cumplimiento;

gestionar las no conformidades, medidas correctoras y medidas preventivas;

registros de control;

planificar y llevar a cabo la auditoría interna del SGE;

revisar el SGE.

Como muestran las experiencias de 50000&1SEAPs, en diferentes países e incluso en

diferentes municipios del mismo país, habrá diferentes motivadores. Entre los principales

motivadores y razones por las que más de 40 autoridades locales desarrollaron,

implementaron y certificaron sus sistemas de gestión de energía y los integraron en sus

PAES son: marco regulatorio, posibilidad de reducir costos, oportunidad de supervisar y

requerir servicios contratados, disponibilidad de datos e interés personal.

Mientras tanto, todavía existen diferentes barreras y desafíos a superar. El consorcio

50000&1SEAPs identificó tres tipos de barreras: primero y más importante - humana, luego

financiera (aunque señalada por un número menor de municipios) y la tercera - técnica.

En el primer capítulo del informe se resumen los resultados y la experiencia en la aplicación

del SGE de más de 40 municipios de ocho países de la UE. El segundo capítulo está

dedicado a los diferentes estudios de caso de las mejores prácticas en los ocho países.

27



Резюме

Макар че Стандартът ISO 50001 е първоначално създаден за промишлени

предприятия, в процеса на енергийно планиране на общините се появява нуждата от

систематичен подход за намаляване на консумацията на енергия и емисиите на CO2

на териториите на местните администрации. Целта на проект „50000 and 1 SEAPs“ бе

да се интегрират Планове за действия за устойчива енергия (ПДУЕ) в над 40 общини

със система за енергийно управление в съответствие с ISO 50001.

Настоящият доклад обобщава резултатите от проверката и мониторинга от

прилагането на системите за управление на енергията (СУЕ) в осем партньорски

държави. Според изискванията на ISO 50001 на етап проверка общините трябва да:

· Планират и проведат правилен мониторинг и измервания;

· Периодично да оценяват съответствието;

· Управляват отклонения, корективни и превантивни мерки;

· Контролират данните;

· Планират и провеждат вътрешен одит на СУЕ;

· Преразглеждат СУЕ.

Както показва опитът от „50000 and 1 SEAPs“, в различни държави и дори в различни

общини в рамките на една и съща държава има различни мотивиращи фактори. Сред

основните мотивиращи фактори и причини, поради които над 40 местни органа

внедриха и се сертифицираха в съответствие с ISO 50001, интегрирайки своите

системи за управление на енергията в разработените в общините ПДУЕ са:

регулаторна рамка, възможност за намаляване на разходите, възможност за надзор и

изискване на външни услуги, възможност за системен подход, наличност на данните и

личен интерес.

В същото време са налице различни ограничения и предизвикателства, с които

общините трябва да се справят. В резултат от опита, натрупан в рамките на „50000 and

1 SEAPs“, проектният консорциум идентифицира три основни групи ограничения: на

първо място – кадрови, след това финансови (макар и определени като такива от

малко на брой общини), а на последно място – технически.

Първата глава от доклада подробно обобщава резултатите и опита от прилагане на

СУЕ в над 40 общини в осем различни европейски държави. Втората глава е

посветена на различни добри практики, свързани с внедряването и сертифицирането

на СУЕ в осемте държави.

28



Sumar Executiv

Deși inițial Standardul ISO 50001 a fost conceput pentru industrie, în cadrul procesului de

planificare energetică a municipalităților, necesitatea unei abordări sistematice privind

reducerea consumului de energie și a emisiilor de CO2 a crescut și în cadrul autorităților

locale. Obiectivul proiectului 50000&1 SEAP a fost integrarea Planurilor de Acțiune privind

Energia Durabilă (SEAP) cu Sistemul de Management Energetic (ISO 50001) în mai mult de

40 de municipalități.

Acest raport sintetizează rezultatele verificării și monitorizării implementării Sistemului de

Management Energetic (EnMS) în cele opt țări partenere. Conform cerințelor ISO 50001, în

faza de control municipalitatea trebuie:

să planifice și să efectueze monitorizarea și măsurarea corespunzătoare;

să evalueze permanent conformitatea;

să gestioneze neconformitățile, măsurile corective, precum și pe cele preventive;

să mențină controlul asupra înregistrărilor;

să planifice și să efectueze un audit intern al EnMS;

să revizuiască EnMS.

După cum arată experiența proiectului 50000&1SEAP, în diferite țări și chiar în diferite

municipalități din aceeași țară, vor exista diferiți factori motivaționali. Dintre principalii factori

motivaționali pentru care mai mult de 40 de autorități locale au dezvoltat, implementat și

certificat sistemele lor de management energetic și le-au integrat în PAED putem enumera:

cadrul de reglementare, posibilitatea reducerii costurilor, posibilitatea de monitoriza și de a

solicita contractarea serviciilor, posibilitatea unei abordări sistematice, precum și

disponibilitatea datelor și interesul personal.

În același timp, încă există diferite obstacole și provocări de depășit. Consorțiul

50000&1SEAPs a identificat trei tipuri de bariere: primul și cel mai important – cel uman, apoi

cel financiar (deși semnalat de un număr mic de municipalități), iar al treilea – cel tehnic.

Primul capitol al raportului rezumă detaliat rezultatele și experiența în implementarea EnMS

la mai mult de 40 de municipalități din opt țări diferite ale UE. Al doilea capitol este dedicat

diferitelor studii de caz privind cele mai bune practici ale EnMS în cele opt țări.

29



Executive summary

Anche se lo standard ISO 50001 è nato inizialmente per il miglioramento della performance

energetica nei processi industriali, anche nelle realtà degli Enti Locali il processo di

pianificazione energetica sta assumendo un ruolo prioritario per la riduzione dei consumi

energetici e per l’abbattimento delle emissioni di CO2 da essi generate. L’obiettivo del

Progetto Europeo 50000&1SEAPs è quello di integrare la logica dei Sistemi di Gestione ISO

50001 con i PAES (Piani d’Azione per l’Energia Sostenibile) in più di 40 Enti Locali negli 8

Paesi target del progetto.

Il presente report riassume i risultati derivanti dal controllo e dal monitoraggio sullo stato di

implementazione dei Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia negli 8 Paesi target. In accordo con

quanto previsto dai requisiti della ISO 50001, con particolare riferimento al controllo ed al

monitoraggio sullo stato di attuazione del Sistema di Gestione dell’Energia, gli Enti Locali

coinvolti sono tenuti a:

pianificare e svolgere un adeguato monitoraggio e misurazione della propria

performance energetica;

valutare periodicamente la propria conformità ai requisiti legali in materia di energia;

gestire le non conformità, le misure correttive e le misure preventive;

mantenere aggiornati i propri registri di controllo del Sistema di Gestione;

pianificare e svolgere gli audit interni conformemente a quanto previsto dalla Norma

ISO 50001;

aggiornare, rivedere e riprogrammare i propri obiettivi, traguardi e piani energetici.

Come dimostrato dalle esperienze maturate nell’ambito del Progetto 50000&1SEAP, in

diversi Paesi membri così come in diverse realtà locali (Comuni, Gruppi di Comuni,

Agglomerazioni e Federazioni) dello stesso Paese, sono presenti diverse ragioni

motivazionali a spingere i diversi Enti Locali verso il percorso della certificazione ISO 50001.

Tra queste, le principali le ragioni per le quali più di 40 autorità locali hanno sviluppato,

implementato e certificato i propri Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia integrandoli nei loro PAES

vi sono: la coerenza ed il rispetto del quadro normativo cogente in tema di energia per gli

Enti Locali, possibilità di riduzione dei costi energetici, la possibilità di supervisione e di

controllo dei servizi e dei contratti di fornitura in tema di energia, possibilità di adottare un

approccio sistematico alla gestione energetica dell’Ente, disponibilità dei dati ed interesse

personale nella gestione energetica dell’Ente da parte di amministratori e funzionari.

Allo stesso tempo restano ancora presenti alcune barriere ed alcune sfide importanti da

superare. Il Consorzio europeo del Progetto 50000&1SEAPs ha identificato le tre maggiori

barriere che dovranno essere superate nella gestione energetica degli Enti: la prima e più

importante è quella legata all’aspetto della sensibilità personale verso il tema di gestione

energetica degli amministratori e dei funzionari pubblici; la seconda è quella riguardante la

30



disponibilità finanziaria per gli investimenti (sottolineata da diverse amministrazioni locali); la

terza è relativa alle conoscenze tecniche in campo a disposizione dei funzionari e degli

amministratori locali.

Il primo capitolo del presente report riassume in dettaglio i risultati e le esperienze di

implementazione maturati nei Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia certificati nei 40 Enti Locali

beneficiari delle attività progettuali provenienti dagli 8 Paesi membri coinvolti. Il secondo

capitolo è dedicato alle migliori pratiche di implementazione dei Sistemi di Gestione

dell’Energia negli 8 Paesi membri coinvolti.

31



Σύνοψη

Αν και το ISO 50001 αρχικά σχεδιάστηκε για βιομηχανίας, προέκυψε από τις Τοπικές Αρχές

η ανάγκη για συστηματική προσέγγιση για τη μείωση της ενεργειακής κατανάλωσης και των

εκπομπών CO2 καθ’ όλη τη διαδικασία του ενεργειακού σχεδιασμού στους Δήμους. Ο στόχος

του έργου 50000&1SEAPs ήταν να ενσωματώσει τα Σχέδια Δράσης Αειφόρου Ενέργειας

(ΣΔΑΕ) σε πάνω από 40 Δήμους με Σύστημα Διαχείρισης Ενέργειας (ISO 50001).

Η έκθεση συνοψίζει τα αποτελέσματα από τον έλεγχο και την παρακολούθηση της

εφαρμογής του Συστήματος Διαχείρισης Ενέργειας (ΣΔΕ) στις οκτώ χώρες των εταίρων.

Σύμφωνα με τις απαιτήσεις του ISO 50001, στη φάση του ελέγχου ο Δήμος θα:

σχεδιάζει και πραγματοποιεί κατάλληλη παρακολούθηση και μέτρηση

αξιολογεί περιοδικά τη συμμόρφωση.

διαχειρίζεται μη συμμορφώσεις, διορθωτικά μέτρα και προληπτικά μέτρα

ελέγχει αρχεία

σχεδιάζει και διεξάγει εσωτερικό έλεγχο του ΣΔΕ.

αναθεωρεί το ΣΔΕ.

Όπως δείχνει η εμπειρία από τo 50000&1SEAPs, σε διαφορετικές χώρες και ακόμη και σε

διαφορετικούς δήμους της ίδιας χώρας, θα υπάρχουν διαφορετικοί κινητήριοι παράγοντες.

Μεταξύ των κύριων παραγόντων και των λόγων για τους οποίους περισσότεροι από 40

οργανισμοί τοπικής αυτοδιοίκησης ανέπτυξαν, εφάρμοσαν και πιστοποίησαν τα συστήματα

ενεργειακής τους διαχείρισης και τα ενσωμάτωσαν στα ΣΔΑΕ τους είναι: κανονιστικό πλαίσιο,

δυνατότητα μείωσης του κόστους, δυνατότητα εποπτείας και απαίτησης προδιαγραφών

υπηρεσιών, δυνατότητα συστηματικής προσέγγισης, διαθεσιμότητα δεδομένων και

προσωπικό ενδιαφέρον.

Εν τω μεταξύ, εξακολουθούν να υπάρχουν διάφορα εμπόδια και προκλήσεις που πρέπει να

ξεπεραστούν. Η κοινοπραξία του 50000&1SEAPs εντόπισε τρία είδη εμποδίων: πρώτο και

πιο σημαντικό – τα ανθρώπινα, στη συνέχεια τα οικονομικά (αν και επισημαίνονται από μικρό

αριθμό Δήμων) και τρίτο – το τεχνικό.

Το πρώτο κεφάλαιο της έκθεσης συνοψίζει λεπτομερώς τα αποτελέσματα και την εμπειρία

από την εφαρμογή του EnMS από περισσότερους από 40 δήμους σε οκτώ διαφορετικές

χώρες της ΕΕ. Το δεύτερο κεφάλαιο είναι αφιερωμένο σε διάφορες περιπτωσιολογικές

μελέτες σχετικά με βέλτιστες πρακτικές στις οκτώ χώρες.

32



Streszczenie

Choć normę ISO 50001 wprowadzono z myślą o przedsiębiorstwach, jej wdrożenie może

być korzystne także dla samorządów lokalnych, które potrzebują bardziej

usystematyzowanego podejścia do działań ukierunkowanych na redukcję zużycia energii i

emisji gazów cieplarnianych. Celem projektu 50000&1 SEAPs było wsparcie ponad 40

europejskich miast i gmin w integracji Planów działań na rzecz zrównoważonej energii

(SEAP) z systemami zarządzania energią (SZE).

Niniejszy raport podsumowuje rezultaty 3 fazy („sprawdzenie”) wdrażania SZE w ośmiu

krajach partnerskich. Zgodnie w wymogami normy ISO 50001 w fazie tej gmina powinna:

zaplanować i zapewnić właściwy monitoring systemu;

okresowo oceniać zgodność systemu z normą;

usunąć wszelkie niezgodności i wprowadzić odpowiednie środki naprawcze i zapobiegawcze;

kontrolować zapisy;

zaplanować i przeprowadzić wewnętrzny audyt systemu;

dokonać przeglądu systemu.

Jak pokazuje doświadczenie projektu 50000&1SEAPs, w różnych krajach (a nawet różnych

gminach z tego samego kraju) występują różne czynniki motywujące do zaplanowania,

wdrożenia i certyfikowania systemu zarządzania energią i jego integracji z planem SEAP.

Wśród nich wymienić można: krajowe regulacje, możliwość zmniejszenia kosztów działania,

lepszą kontrolę nabywanych usług zewnętrznych, przyjęcie bardziej systematycznego

podejścia do zarządzania energią, dostępność danych czy osobiste zainteresowanie

tematem.

Istnieją też bariery i wyzwania, które utrudniają wdrażanie systemu w gminach. Do

najważniejszych barier zidentyfikowanych przez konsorcjum projektu 50000&1SEAPs

należą: brak odpowiednich zasobów kadrowych, brak środków (choć ten problem

zasygnalizowała niewielka liczba samorządów) i przeszkody natury technicznej.

W pierwszym rozdziale raportu szczegółowo omówiono najważniejsze doświadczenia i

rezultaty związane z wdrażaniem SZE w ponad 40 miastach i gminach z 8 krajów UE. Drugi

rozdział jest natomiast poświęconym przykładom dobrych praktyk w tym zakresie.

33



Résumé

Même si l'ISO 50001 a d'abord été conçue pour le secteur de l’industrie, tout au long du

processus de planification énergétique dans les municipalités, le besoin d’une approche

systématique pour réduire la consommation d'énergie et les émissions de CO2 s’est fait

ressentir dans les collectivités locales. L'objectif du projet 50000 & 1SEAPs était d'intégrer

des plans d'action énergétiques durables (SEAP) dans plus de 40 municipalités dotées d'un

système de gestion de l'énergie (ISO 50001).

Ce rapport résume les résultats de la vérification et du suivi de la mise en œuvre du système

de management de l'énergie (SMEn) dans les huit pays partenaires. Selon les exigences de

l'ISO 50001, dans la phase de vérification, la municipalité doit:

• planifier et effectuer une surveillance et une mesure appropriées;

• évaluer périodiquement la conformité;

• gérer les non-conformités, les mesures correctives et les mesures préventives;

• dossiers de contrôle;

• planifier et effectuer un audit du SMEn;

• vérifier le SMEn.

Comme l'expérience de 50000&1SEAPs le montre, dans différents pays et même dans

différentes municipalités du même pays, il y aura différents facteurs de motivation. Les

principaux facteurs de motivation et les raisons pour lesquelles plus de 40 autorités locales

ont développé, mis en œuvre et également certifié leurs systèmes de gestion de l'énergie en

les intégrant dans leurs SEAP sont : cadre réglementaire, possibilité de réduire les coûts,

possibilité de superviser et la nécessité de services contractuels, possibilité d'approche

systématique, disponibilité des données et intérêt personnel.

En attendant, il existe encore des obstacles et des défis à surmonter. Le consortium

50000&1 SEAPs a identifié trois types d'obstacles: le premier et le plus important – l’humain,

puis financier (bien que signalé par un nombre mineur de municipalités) et le troisième -

technique.

Le premier chapitre du rapport résume en détail les résultats et l'expérience de la mise en

œuvre de l'EnMS auprès de plus de 40 municipalités dans huit pays de l'UE différents. Le

deuxième chapitre est consacré aux études de différents cas de meilleures pratiques de

SMEn dans les huit pays.

34



CONSORTIUM:

SOGESCA (Coordinator) - www.sogesca.it

CRES - www.cres.gr

PNEC - www.pnec.org.pl

EKODOMA - www.ekodoma.lv

ARM - www.arm-bg.net

ECQ - www.ecq-bg.com

AMET - www.amet.ro

DENKSTATT - www.denkstatt.ro

DEPUTACION OURENSE - www.depourense.es

ALBEA - www.albea-transenergy.com

AMORCE - www.amorce.asso.fr

MT PARTENAIRES INGÉNIERIE - www.mt-partenaires.com

ICLEI Europe - www.iclei-europe.org

http://www.sogesca.it/

http://www.cres.gr/

http://www.pnec.org.pl/

http://www.ekodoma.lv/

http://www.arm-bg.net/

http://www.ecq-bg.com/

http://www.amet.ro/

http://www.denkstatt.ro/

http://www.depourense.es/

http://www.albea-transenergy.com/

http://www.amorce.asso.fr/

http://www.mt-partenaires.com/

http://www.iclei-europe.org/

report on the implementation of the enms according to iso ... · 5 twitter: @500001seaps...

Documents