report on stica‘06
DESCRIPTION
REPORT ON STICA‘06. 1st International Workshop on Semantic Technologies in Collaborative Applications http://www.ag-nbi.de/conf/STICA06 Chairman: Robert Tolksdorf Represented by Ernesto Jimenez Ruiz. AGENDA. Topics of the Workshop Papers Presented Tools Applications Methodologies - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
REPORT ON STICA‘06
1st International Workshop onSemantic Technologies in Collaborative Applications
http://www.ag-nbi.de/conf/STICA06
Chairman: Robert Tolksdorf
Represented by Ernesto Jimenez Ruiz
AGENDA
Topics of the Workshop Papers Presented
Tools Applications Methodologies Summary of the Best Workshop Paper
Results and Conclusions Open Issues Identified Collaboration between works
TOPICS OF THE WORKSHOP
Methodologies for collaboratively creating and managing shared information
Collaborative ontology engineering Semantic collaboration applications Collaborative Semantic Web portals Semantic community support systems Semantic Wikis Semantic Blogging Semantic Mindmapping and Conceptmapping Studies on the value added to collaboration by semantic
technologies Future research directions in the area of semantic collaboration
TOOLS
Ivan Cantador, Pablo Castells, David Vallet: Enriching Group Profiles with Ontologies for Knowledge-driven Collaborative Content Retrieval Proposes a Study of social choice theory based
strategies to combine ontology-based user profiles Presents a multimedia retrieval system based on group
profiles
Bi Chen, He Tan, Patrick Lambrix: Structure-based filtering for ontology alignment Proposes a New algorithm for ontology alignment Provides Support for effective collaboration
APPLICATIONS
Danius Michaelides, Simon Buckingham Shum, Ben Juby, Clara Mancini, Roger Slack:Memetic: Semantic Meeting Memory Presents an Environment for recording and replaying
meetings Semantic annotations on content of meetings
Sebastian Schaffert: IkeWiki: A Semantic Wiki for Collaborative Knowledge Management Presents a Semantic Wiki application Provides Facilitates for collaborative knowledge engineering
through Semantically annotated links, Context representation, Reasoning on the knowledge base, etc.
METHODOLOGIES (I) Sören Auer:
RapidOWL - an Agile Knowledge Engineering Methodology Supports adaptive semantic collaboration between
domain experts and knowledge engineers Based on the idea of iterative refinement, annotation
and structuring of knowledge bases
Michael Engler, Denny Vrandecic, York Sure:A Tool for DILIGENT Argumentation: Experiences, Requirements and Design Presents a Tool for Capturing argumentations in
distributed ontology engineering processes.
METHODOLOGIES (II) A View-based Methodology for Collaborative
Ontology Engineering: an Approach for Complex Applications (VIMethCOE) Ernesto Jiménez Ruiz, Rafael Berlanga Temporal Knowledge Bases Group University Jaume I of Castellon
Selected as the best workshop paper based on the reviews…
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (I)
Need for new methodologies that consider new dimensions in the development of Ontologies
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (II)
How to Achieve a Good Balance Between Dimensions? We want to achieve
A highly Dynamic development.
A Distributed team structure.
And Partially Controlled scenario.
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (III)
Proposed Requirements: Modularization Local Adaptation Knowledge Abstraction Definition of Personal Modules: Views Argumentation and Consensus
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (IV)
Users works only with a portion of the knowledge: Views.
Views are defined by the developer and they are a kind of module.
The operation through views provide: Knowledge Abstraction Facilities for Visualization in ontology editors
Both for the developer and the editor Reuse of Knowledge
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (V)
Views can be defined over modules or over other views.
Views are grouped inside a hierarchy depending on their definition and the changes made.
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (VI)
Phases on the Development: Complementary to centralized methodologies
We distinguish 5 different phases: Requirements Development (Application of Centralized Methodologies)
Publication and Argumentation Evaluation and Maintenance Application
VIMethCOE METHODOLOGY (VII)
In VIMethCOE we propose the coexistence of several overlapped knowledge spaces:
STICA 2006
Results and Conclusions
Open Issues Identified
Collaboration between works
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION (I) It is worthwhile to “ontologise” at least parts of
collaborative applications
It is beneficial to keep argumentations from ontology-engineering processes for reference
Semantic Web based applications represent “future proof”
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION (II)
Semantic Web and Wiki dominate current work
Applications and tools currently are centralized and organization based.
However methodologies propose distributed approaches
OPEN ISSUES IDENTIFIED Added value from application of semantic
technologies cannot be pin-pointed today
Further semantic technologies and collaboration styles have to be explored (semantic blogs, semantic mindmaps, etc.)
Semantic Interoperability is not taken into account sufficiently, therefore inter-organizational semantic collaboration is not enabled so far
COLLABORATION BETWEEN WORKS
Collaborations amongst presented projects explored for workshop report
VIMethCOE(Ernesto Jiménez)
Enriching Group Profiles(Ivan Cantador)
DILIGENT(Michael Engler)
Ontology Alignment(Bi Chen)
RapidOWL(Sören Auer)
IkiWiki(Sebastian Schaffert)
Memetic(Danius Michaelides)
STICA 2007?
Depends on the Organization…
Union with other WETICE Workshop
Questions? Robert Tolksdorf ([email protected])