report on initial phases of groundwater midway, …

REPORT ON

INITIAL PHASES OF GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLANNING

VILLAGE OF MIDWAY MIDWAY BRITSH COLUMBIA

Submitted to Village of Midway

661 Eighth Ave Box 160

Midway BC VOH IMO

DISTRIBUTION

3 Copies - Village of Midway 1 Copy - Golder Associates Ltd

October 31 2008 08-1440-0102

December 2008 - 1 shy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Golder Associates Ltd (Golder) is pleased to present this report which outlines the initial stages in the development of a Groundwater Protection Plan (GWPP) for the three water supply wells currently owned by the Village of Midway It is understood that two of the Village wells (Well No I and 2) are currently used to supply domestic water to Village residents while the third well (Well No3) is not currently in use but is being considered for use as a backup domestic water supply well During the course of the development of this GWPP it was discovered that the Village has a fourth well (Well No4) which has been out of operation for an undetermined amount of time

It is understood that prior to the drilling of Well No1 and upgrading the Village water supply system in 1995 the majority of water supply in the Village was provided by privately owned wells and Wells No2 and 3 were only used to supply a small portion of the community The majority of homeowners in Midway have connected to the Village water system for domestic water supply however Village records indicate the presence of 32 private wells it is understood that at least six private irrigation wells are still in use within the Village boundaries

The objective of the first phase in the development of the GWPP is to assess the short term (250-day) time-of-travel zone for each of the Village wells and to complete a preliminary contaminant inventory within these time-of-travel capture zones

Results of the hydrogeological assessment indicated the aquifer in the area of Midway (Aquifer No 478) is a sand and gravel aquifer which ranges from unconfined in the vicinity of Wells 2 and 3 to semi-confined in the vicinity of the Village Well No1 The estimated aquifer thickness is approximately 20 m It is inferred that groundwater flow in the area of the Village is from the upland areas in the north towards the Kettle River in the south with a southeasterly component of flow as a result of the southerlysoutheasterly flowing Kettle River It is also expected that another component of groundwater flow is present in the area of the Village and is controlled by water levels in the Kettle River

Due to the uncertainty in the groundwater flow direction the presence of the Kettle River which may act as a positive boundary condition and due to the large range in hydraulic conductivity estimates for the aquifer it was determined that the analytical method of capture zone analysis was not appropriate and as such the CFR method was utilized to estimate the extent of a 250-day time-of-travel zones for Village Wells No1 2 and 3

Golder Associates


The 250-day CFR time-of-travel capture zone for Well No 1 has a radius of approximately 130 m while that of Well No2 has a radius of approximately 70 m Based on a theoretical pumping rate of 172 Lis the 250-day time-of-travel capture zone for Well No3 would have a radius of approximately 150 m

Based on the results of the contaminant inventory review it was noted that the majority of the area around Midway contains residential agricultural and undeveloped land In general land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zones of the active Village Wells No1 and 2 consisted of active and potentially abandoned wells and agricultural recreational and residential land uses Land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zone of the inactive Village Well No3 consisted of residential and agricultural land transportation corridors (Highway 3 and the former CPR line) Items of concern noted during the well head assessments consisted of the usage of a dust suppression agent immediately adjacent to the well house of Well No2 and the storage of a pail of an unconfirmed substance in the well house and the presence of a black tarry substance spilled on the floor in one area of the well house of Well No3

In addition a preliminary GWUDI (Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of surface water) assessment was conducted for the Village Wells Results indicated that the well completion details for the three wells do not meet the BC GWPR (ie the presence of a surface seal) and as such the preliminary GWUDI assessment would indicate that the wells could potentially be considered GWUDI Although additional investigations would be required to confirm GWUDI status for these wells this could imply that potential treatment (filtration or chlorination) of the water may be required by the Health Authority

The following recommendations are made with regards to continuing the GWPP process for the Village

1 Presentation of Results

It is recommended that the results of the initial phases in the development of a Groundwater Protection Plan be presented to Village council members and the Community Planning Team to receive their input regarding the direction of the plan

2 Confirmation of Static Water Levels Groundwater Flow Direction and Gradient and Refinement of Time-of-Travel Capture Zones

As the direction of groundwater flow within Aquifer No 478 could not be confirmed due to the limitations in water level data (water levels collected at different times of the year and poor spatial data) as well as a lack of River elevations it is recommended that static

Golder Associates


water levels within the aquifer be confirmed This would include the verification of wellhead elevations static water levels within the Village wells and nearby private wells and surface water river elevations

Once groundwater levels river elevations and hydraulic gradients have been confirmed the time-of-travel capture zones should be refined For this purpose consideration could be given to using either the analytical methodology or a numerical groundwater model

3 Confirmation of Water Balance

Due to the uncertainty in the water balance for the Midway area particularly the groundwater extraction rates from the aquifer it is recommended that the Village attempt to obtain total annual extraction and pumping information from other groundwater users in the Village namely the private irrigation well owners and the High School Once the groundwater extraction data is obtained refinements to the water balance can be provided

4 GWUDI Assessment

Preliminary information indicates that the Village wells can potentially be flagged as GWUDI mainly due to the lack of a surface seal around the well As such it is recommended that the Village consider installing a surface seal around each well and conduct other works to bring the wells into compliance with the BC Groundwater Protection Regulations (ie ensure that all caps are securely placed place Well ID Plates on wells etc) Following confirmation of the groundwater flow direction and gradient the GWUDI status of the wells may be assessed taking into consideration the refined time-of-travel capture zones

5 Completion of Steps 4 5 and 6 of the WPT

The completion of subsequent Steps 4 (Develop Management Strategies) Steps 5 (Develop Contingency Plans) and 6 (Monitor Results and On-going Evaluation of the Plan) as outlined in the Well Protection Toolkit should be completed as Phase II of the development of a GWPP As part of these steps consideration may be given to the following designating groundwater protection areas developing groundwater protection measures decommissioning abandoned wells and implementing groundwater protection measures at the well heads

Golder Associates

December 2008 - iv shy

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

10 INTRODUCTION 1 20 BACKGROUND 1 30 METHODOLOGY 2

31 Well Protection Toolkit 2 32 Step 2 - Define Well Protection Areas 4 33 Step 3 - Contaminant Inventory 6

40 STUDY AREA 7 41 Location and Climate 7 42 Topography and Drainage 7 43 Overview of Surficial and Bedrock Geology 8 44 Aquifer Characteristics 8 45 Groundwater Flow Direction 9

50 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 10 51 Village of Midway Wells 10

511 Well No 1 10 512 Well No 2 11 513 Well No 3 12 514 Well No4 (Abandoned Village Office Well) 13

52 Other Groundwater Users 13 53 Aquifer Transmissivity 13 54 Aquifer Water Balance 14

541 Recharge 14 542 Extraction 15 543 Net Water Balance 16

55 Preliminary GWUDI Assessment 16 60 WELL PROTECTION TOOLKIT 18

61 Step 1 - Community Planning 18 62 Step 2 - Define Well Protection Areas 18

621 Time of Travel Zone Results 18 63 Step 3 - Preliminary Contaminant Inventory 19

631 Results of Regional Contaminant Inventory 19 632 Results of Contaminant Inventories for Capture Zones 23 633 Results of Contaminant Inventories for Well Heads 24 634 Contaminant Inventory Summary 24

70 CONCLUSIONS 25 80 RECOMMENDATIONS 26 90 LIMITATIONS AND USE OF REPORT 32 100 CLOSURE 33 110 REFERENCES Error Bookmark not defined

Golder Associates

December 2008 - v shy

LIST OF TABLES Table I Annual Pumping Volumes (2005-2007) Village of Midway Wells Table 2 Summary of Well Information Village of Midway Wells Table 3 Contaminant Inventory within Time-of-Travel Capture Zones (In Text)

LIST OF FIGURES Figure I Key Plan Figure 2 Village of Midway Well Location Plan and Groundwater Contours Figure 3 Aquifer and Watershed Areas Figure 4 Time-of-travel Zones and Contaminant Inventory for Village of Midway

Wells

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix I Calculated Fixed Radius Method of Time-of-Travel Capture Zone

Analysis Appendix II Extent of Aquifer and MOE Well Locations Identified by Well Tag

Number Appendix III Water Well Records Obtained from MOE used in Estimation of

Groundwater Flow Direction Appendix IV Well Records for Village of Midway Wells from Kala (1995a and 1995b) Appendix V Document Excerpts Provided by Village of Midway Confirming Existence

of Well No4 Appendix VI Village of Midway Official Community Plan Appendix VII BC MOE Contaminated Site Registry Database Search July 6 2008 Appendix VIII Groundwater Protection Measures

Golder Associates

December 2008 - VI shy

LIST OF ACRONYMS CAEAL Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories CFR Calculated Fixed Radius GWPP Groundwater Protection Plan GWPR British Columbia Groundwater Protection Regulation GWUDI Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of surface water IHA Interior Health Authority Lis Iitreslsecond masl meters above sea level m bgs meters below ground surface MOE British Columbia Ministry of Environment OCP Official Community Plan RDKB Regional District of Kootenay Boundary USgpm US gallons per minute WPT Well Protection Toolkit WRA MOE Water Resources Atlas WTN Well Tag Number (as provided in the MOE Well Database)

Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION

Golder Associates Ltd (Golder) is pleased to present this report which outlines the initial stages in the development of a Groundwater Protection Plan (GWPP) for the three water supply wells currently owned by the Village of Midway (or the Village) located within the southern interior of BC approximately 25 km west of Grand Forks BC (Figure 1) and approximately 1 kIn north of the CanadalUnited States Border It is understood that two of the Village wells (Well No1 and 2) are currently used to supply domestic water to Village residents while the third well (Well No3) is not currently in use but is being considered for use as a backup domestic water supply well In addition during the course of the development of this GWPP it was discovered that the Village has a fourth well that they were unaware of (Well No4) which has been out of operation for an undetermined amount of time Based on conversations with Mr Jim Madder of the Village it is understood that this GWPP will focus on Wells No1 2 and 3 with some preliminary recommendations provided regarding Well No4

Recent initiatives from the Interior Health Authority (IHA) require that groundwater protection planning be undertaken as a condition of the water distributors operating permit The current work was completed at the request of the Village of Midway to meet this requirement It is our understanding that the GWPP is being developed with the assistance of provincial infrastructure grant money through the Local Government Grants Program The completion of Steps 1-3 of the BC Ministry of Environments (MOEs) Well Head Protection Toolkit as outlined in the Methodology section of this report will provide the information required to develop the initial phases of a GWPP for the Village of Midway

The Terms of Reference for this Study are outlined in Golders workplan submitted to the Village on September 28 2007 entitled Workplan and Cost Estimate - Groundwater Protection Planning Village of Midway BC (Proposal No P72-4191) Written authorization to proceed with the Study was received from Mr Jim Madder of the Village of Midway on May 212008

20 BACKGROUND

The Village of Midway currently owns four water wells two of which (Wells No1 and No2) are currently in use one of which was formerly used as an irrigation well but is not currently being used (Well No3) and one abandoned well (Well No4) which is apparently located in the vicinity of the Village office (Figure 2)

Information regarding the Village wells was collected from the following sources interviews with the Village of Midway Administrator Mr Jim Madder and Public Works

Golder Associates


Foreman Mr John Boltz a search of the MOE Wells database and reports completed by other consultants that were provided to Golder by the Village of Midway

It is understood that prior to 1995 the majority of water supply in the Village was provided by privately owned wells and Wells No2 and 3 were only used to supply a small portion of the community It is understood that Well No2 located on the closed portion of Dawson Street midway between 6th Avenue and i h Avenue was formerly known as Well B and that Well No3 located on the north side of the CPR right-of-way near the intersection of 12th Avenue and Beamish Street was formerly known as Well A These two wells were tested by Kala Groundwater Consulting Ltd (Kala) in 1995 (1995a) Following well testing Kala completed the construction and testing of a production well designated as Well No1 located near the intersection of Jesalin Street and 6th Avenue immediately to the east of the High School The Village Well locations are provided on Figure 2 Construction of Well No1 was part of a large-scale upgrade of the Village water system which also included upgrades to Well No 2 and the construction of a water reservoir for the Village

It is understood that since the upgrading of the water system the majority of homeowners in Midway have connected to the Village water system for domestic water supply but that a number of private domestic water supply wells and private irrigation wells exist Based on information provided by Village of Midway staff 32 private wells are known to exist within the Village It is not known how many of these wells are in use however it is understood that at least six private irrigation wells are still in use within the Village boundaries The approximate locations of these irrigation wells as provided by Village of Midway staff are identified on Figure 2

The objective of the first phase in the development of the GWPP is to assess the short term (250-day) time-of-travel zone for each of the Village wells and to complete a preliminary contaminant inventory within these time-of-travel capture zones This information will help with the effective management and protection of the groundwater resource

30 METHODOLOGY

31 Well Protection Toolkit

The Well Protection Toolkit (WPT) was used as a guide in the development of the Village of Midway GWPP The WPT was developed jointly by Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Health in 2000 and consists of a six-step process to assist communities that utilize groundwater to better manage and protect their drinking water sources

Golder Associates


The six steps outlined in the WPT are as follows

Step 1 Form a Community Planning Team Step 2 Define the Well Protection Areas Step 3 Identify Potential Contaminants Step 4 Develop Management Strategies Step 5 Develop Contingency Plans and Step 6 Monitor Results and On-going Evaluation of the Plan

For this study the basic components of the first three steps (Steps 1 to 3) of the WPT were followed However based on Golders experience with developing GWPPs it was determined that the best approach for the development of the Village of Midway GWPP was to complete the technical aspects of the study before forming a Community Planning Team and initiating public involvement in the GWPP With this in mind the initial emphasis of the study was on defining the 250-day time-of-travel capture zones for the Village Wells and identifying potential threats to the groundwater resource from surrounding land use Once the technical information presented in this report is reviewed and finalized it can be presented to the public for review and input

The following provides the specific scope of work for this initial phase of the GWPP

bull Gather and review available information on the Village wells and local aquifer

bull Complete a Site Reconnaissance and wellhead assessments of the Village Wells to determine the level of compliance of the wells with the current BC Groundwater Protection Regulation (GWPR) and to collect static water levels of the wells to estimate a groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient

bull Identify aquifer characteristics in the area and estimate the extent of the shortshyterm time-of-travel capture zones for the Village Wells by incorporating available information regarding the groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient

bull Complete a preliminary contaminant inventory for the Village Wells which includes reviewing available information (land use maps and zoning bylaws) completing a search of the MOE Contaminated Sites Registry Database conducting interviews with representatives of relevant government agencies and conducting a windshield survey of the area

bull Prepare a report summarizing the study and

bull Present the findings of the report to the Community Planning Team and Village of Midway council

Golder Associates


It is understood that further progress in the development of the Village of Midway GWPP (the completion of Steps 4 5 and 6) will be based on the findings of this report and will be a function of funding availability Issues related to existing water quality monitoring were beyond the work scope for this initial stage of GWPP and should be addressed in future stages of this initiative (ie Step 6)

It should also be noted that in March 2005 the Ministry of Health Services and the MOE completed a draft version of the Comprehensive Drinking Water Source to Tap Assessment Guideline (Source to Tap Guideline) The guideline provides a structured approach to evaluate risks to drinking water in the entire drinking water system The guideline is also structured so as to satisfy the requirements of any drinking water assessments which may be ordered by a Drinking Water Officer under the British Columbia Drinking Water Protection Act The guideline is a flexible methodology for evaluating drinking water risks which consists of the following eight modules

Module 1 Delineate and characterize drinking water source(s)

Module 2 Conduct contaminant source inventory

Module 3 Assess water system components

Module 4 Evaluate water system management operation and maintenance practices

Module 5 Audit finished water quality and quantity

Module 6 Review financial capacity and governance of the water service agency

Module 7 Characterize drinking water risks from source to tap

Module 8 Propose a drinking water risk management strategy

It is apparent that Modules 1 and 2 of the Source to Tap Guideline encompass Steps 2 and 3 of the Well Protection Toolkit and that the remaining six modules address other components of the drinking water system which are not specific to groundwater sources As such it is understood that an assessment completed using the methodology of the Well Protection Toolkit could easily be included as part of a larger Source to Tap Guideline Assessment should it be required at a later date

32 Step 2 - Define Well Protection Areas

To efficiently manage and protect a groundwater supply the well protection area must be defined This requires an understanding of the source of groundwater that is removed from an aquifer and the definition of the well capture zone and the time-of-travel zones

During the pumping of a water production well groundwater is removed from a finite volume of the aquifer In the initial phases of pumping the drawdown cone created by the well expands and groundwater is removed from storage within the aquifer (due to

Golder Associates


pore drainage aquifer matrix compression and water compressibility) In later stages once the drawdown cone attains sufficient dimensions andor intersects a water body groundwater flows radially towards the production well and the aquifer is replenished by recharge due to precipitation andor leakage from streams rivers and geologic units bounding the aquifer

A capture zone is the area of an aquifer from which all groundwater will eventually arrive at the production well even after a considerable amount of time A time-ofshytravel zone is the area of an aquifer from which groundwater will be derived in a predefined amount of time For example if the contaminant is released within the 250shyday time-of-travel zone it can be expected to arrive at the production well in approximately 250 days Once the time-of-travel zones are estimated protective measures can be implemented within the zones to promote the safety of the water supply

Several methods of capture zone analysis exist including 1) the calculated fixed radius method (CFR) 2) type curves and analytical equations for capture zone extent and 3) numerical flow and transport models The methods vary in their accuracy and applicability with Methods I and 2 being restricted to a relatively simple groundwater regime and Method 3 being capable of addressing scenarios with more complicated hydrostratigraphy hydrogeologic boundaries and variable pumping scenarios

Based on the hydrogeological regime in the Midway area and the limited information currently available particularly with regards to hydraulic gradients and direction of groundwater flow Golder used the calculated fixed radius methodology (Method 1) to determine time-of-travel zones for the Village As discussed in Section 50 there was insufficient information available to assess the time-of-travel capture zones by Method 2

Information regarding the characteristics of the aquifer was obtained from the following sources

bull Information obtained from the MOE Water Resources Atlas regarding the locations of wells catchment areas aquifer extent and water well records and

bull Information obtained from the MOE Ecological Reports Catalogue regarding floodplain mapping in the area of Midway (British Columbia Water Surveys Unit and Canada-BC Floodplain Mapping Program 1991)

It should be noted that information obtained from the MOE that is provided in this report for reference purposes is subject to copyright and is reproduced with permission of the Province of British Columbia

For the purpose of this study Golder Associates carried out a preliminary analysis of the 250-day time-of-travel zones for the Wells No1 2 and 3 Although Well No3 is not currently being used we have assessed a potential capture zone for this well should it be

Golder Associates


brought into operation Based on our current understanding a 250-day time-of-travel zone delineates the approximated maximum time required by biological pathogens moving in groundwater to degrade (Taylor et ai 2004) In order to conduct the time-ofshytravel zone analysis Golder examined data regarding the annual pumping volumes of Well No1 and 2 for the years 2005 2006 and 2007 which were provided by the Village of Midway (Table 1) It is understood that the actual usage period of Well No 1 is from the beginning of April until the end of December (275 days) and the usage period of Well No2 is from the beginning of January until the end of March (90 days) Therefore the time-of-travel zones for each well were estimated for the following scenario

bull Well No1 is pumped at a rate of 134 Lis (212 US gpm) which is the average pumping rate of the well during the 275 day period of operation of the well in 2006 the year with the largest recorded pumping volume for Well No1

bull Well No2 is pumped at a rate of 38 Lis (60 US gpm) which is which is the average pumping rate of the well during the 90 day period of operation of the well in 2005 the period with largest recorded pumping volume for Well No2 and

bull Well No3 is pumped at a rate of 172 Lis (273 US gpm) which is the sum of the pumping rates for Well No1 and 2 Although Well No3 is not in use by the Village an estimate of pumping rate is required in order to conduct the time-ofshytravel zone analysis therefore in order to obtain a conservative estimate of the time-of-travel zone a pumping rate which reflects the maximum recorded groundwater extraction rate by the Village was utilized in the analysis

33 Step 3 - Contaminant Inventory

A contaminant inventory was carried out to identify existing and potential sources of groundwater contamination within the Village of Midway The inventory was comprised of two components

1 A regional inventory to identify general environmental concerns in the area of the Village and

2 A comprehensive inventory of the Village wells time-of-travel capture zones

A summary of information sources used to complete the regional and time-of travel capture zone contaminant inventories is presented below

bull A search of the MOE Contaminated Sites Registry database to identify properties contained within the database that are located within the Study Area

Golder Associates


bull Interviews with Mr John Boltz Village Public Works Foreman regarding the status of each well the extent of sanitary sewers and any potential environmental concerns

bull Discussions with Mr Jim Madder (Village Administrator) and other Village staff regarding locations of private irrigation wells and abandoned wells

bull Review of Village maps showing land use zoning

bull Visual inspections of the wellheads for Village Wells No1 2 and 3

bull Site reconnaissance of time-of-travel capture zones

40 STUDY AREA

o Location and Climate

Midway is located within the southern interior of BC approximately 1 km north of the CanadalUnited States Border and approximately 25 km west of Grand Forks Be

Long-term climate data for the area was collected from the nearby climate stations operated by Environment Canada located in Midway and Grand Forks Be The Midway climate station has records for the period 1987 to 2007 while the Grand Forks station has data for the period 1941 to 2007 According to these records the area is characterized by warm dry summers and cool wet winters with the lowest mean monthly precipitation occurring in September and the highest mean monthly precipitation occurring in December The average annual temperature in the area is 77 T The mean annual precipitation for the Grand Forks climate station is 475 mm while the mean annual precipitation for Midway is 457 mm Based on the long-term data available for the Grand Forks climate station the area has received greater than average precipitation since the period from 2000 to 2003 during which time precipitation was slightly below average

o Topography and Drainage

The Village of Midway is located within the Kettle River Valley a wide U-shaped valley located on a previous flood plain of the Kettle River The Kettle River is located along the Villages southern boundary and flows west to east through Midway until it reaches the confluence of Boundary Creek located near the eastern limits of the Village (Figure 3) Downstream of Boundary Creek the Kettle River flows southeasterly into the state of Washington USA

Most of the Village is located within the valley bottom where the topography is relatively flat The elevation of the Village varies from approximately 590 m above sea level (m asl) in the western portion of Midway to 575 m asl at the confluence of the Kettle

Golder Associates


River and Boundary Creek The highland areas to the north and south of the Village rise to over 1000 m asl

Many minor creeks and ephemeral streams which drain the upland areas enter the Kettle River in the area of the Village including Murray Gulch Creek (Figure 3) which drains areas to the north of the Village The drainage area of Boundary Creek extends through the Kettle Provincial Forest into the Monashee Mountains in the area of Greenwood (Figure 3) No major lakes are present in the area

o Overview of Surficial and Bedrock Geology

The surficial geology of the study area is characterized by Quaternary sediments that were deposited along the Kettle River and alluvial fan deposits from Murray Gulch Creek and Boundary Creek These deposits extend to approximately 1200 m upslope on the north side of the Kettle River and approximately 500 m on the south side of the river Based on a review of selected well logs from the MOE WRA for wells completed within the Village the surficial geology in the area of the Village wells consists of interbedded layers of sand and gravel with some clay silt and boulders of varying thicknesses throughout the aquifer to maximum depths of 41 m below ground surface (m bgs) Because the less permeable or confining materials are discontinuous across the aquifer the aquifer is considered to be semi-confined in nature

The bedrock in the area provides a physical boundary within which the unconsolidated sediments of the Kettle River Valley are situated The bedrock in the area of Midway consists predominantly of Penticton Group volcanics comprised of undivided alkalic and calcalkaline volcanic rocks The area also contains some Post Accretionary syenitic to monzonitic intrusive rocks (MOE WRA 2007) Well logs obtained from the MOE WRA did not indicate the depth to bedrock in the area of the Village According to the MOE WRA there is one normal fault located near the eastern boundary of the Village which is oriented in a north-south direction and traverses the path of the Kettle River

o Aquifer Characteristics

A search of aquifer locations in the BC MOE online mapping program iMap BC (BC MOE 2008) indicated the presence of a single sand and gravel aquifer in the vicinity of the Village of Midway (Appendix II) This aquifer identified as Aquifer No 478 has a relatively high productivity high demand and high vulnerability The total area of the aquifer extent as identified by the BC MOE is approximately 360 ha (Figure 3)

Golder Associates


o Groundwater Flow Direction

Based on the premise that the groundwater table is a subdued replica of surface topography it is expected that groundwater flow in the area of the Village is from the upland areas in the north towards the Kettle River in the south It is also expected that a secondary component of groundwater flow is influenced by the easterly to southeasterly flowing Kettle River and by water levels in the River

In order to develop an understanding of the groundwater flow direction in the area groundwater elevations were calculated for the Village wells based on static water levels recorded during pumping tests conducted by Kala (1995a and 1995b) (Figure 2) In addition groundwater level information contained in well logs obtained from the BC MOE Wells was examined Ground elevations used in the estimation of water levels were taken from a floodplain mapping study (British Columbia Water Surveys Unit and Canada-BC Floodplain Mapping Program 1991) available from the online BC MOE Ecological Reports Catalogue as these were the most detailed ground elevations available for the area

The water level information from the above mentioned wells indicates that on the north side of the Kettle River groundwater elevations are generally higher in the northern and western Village areas while groundwater elevations are lower in the southern and eastern Village areas This supports a southerly to southeasterly groundwater flow direction through the Village of Midway It should be noted that water levels obtained from well records are only an estimate due to the limitations in using water levels recorded in different years and in differing seasons and due to the fact that well locations and elevations were estimated given a lack of data in this respect Copies of well records used in the review of water level information for the aquifer are provided in Appendix III

No hydrometric station is present in the immediate vicinity of the Village and as such River elevations in the Village area could not be assessed relative to local groundwater levels However based on available information it is possible that surface water elevations within the Kettle River impact the groundwater flow direction in the area of the River Specifically during freshet (spring runoff) when water levels within the River are high it is possible that there is a component of surface water recharging local groundwater During times when the surface water elevation within the River is lower local groundwater may recharge the River However based on limited information the relative influence of recharge from the upland areas to the north and contributions from the River on the direction of groundwater flow cannot be assessed at this time

Golder Associates

December 2008 - 10shy

50 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

51 Village of Midway Wells

The following provides a summary of the available information regarding the known construction details pumping test information and conditions encountered during drilling for each of the Village of Midway wells A summary of well information is provided in Table 2 and copies of the well records are provided in Appendix IV

511 Well NO1

According to Mr Boltz Well No 1 is the main Village well and is utilized during the summer months approximately from the beginning of April until the end of December According to the drillers log (Kala 1995b) Well No1 is 300 mm in diameter and is completed at a total depth of 295 m bgs Conditions encountered during drilling consisted of sand and gravel to a depth of 107 m bgs followed by compact sand and gravel with some clay to a depth of 152 m bgs This was further underlain by interlayered sand and gravel to 296 mbgs Drilling ceased in a deposit of sand between 296 m bgs and 305 mbgs The well was completed with 120 slot and 150 slot telescopic stainless steel screen set from 231 to 295 m bgs The static water level was recorded to be approximately 8 m bgs at the time the well was drilled

Following completion of Well No1 Kala conducted a series of aquifer response tests on the well Initially a step-drawdown test was conducted at rates ranging from 126 Lis (200 US gallons per minute (gpm)) to 525 Lis (832 USgpm) The step-drawdown test was followed by a constant rate pumping test which was performed at a rate of 505 Lis (800 USgpm) The static water level at the time of testing was approximately 8 m bgs with a total drawdown observed during the constant rate test of 24 m

According to Kala (1995b) results of the aquifer testing indicated the presence of a boundary condition reached after 50 minutes of pumping which was interpreted to represent the drawdown cone reaching a zone of lower permeability deposits Kala utilized data from the steepest part of the drawdown curve to obtain a theoretical safe long term yield of 946 Lis (1500 USgpm) however it was noted that the screen transmitting capacity of the well is less than this value 789 Lis (1250 USgpm) at the maximum recommended entrance velocity of 003 ms

Based on the pumping data provided by the Village the average pumping rate of 134 Lis (212 US gpm) is approximately 13 of the screen transmitting capacity and the maximum recorded daily pumping rate of 495 Lis (785 US gpm) recorded on July 11 2007 is approximately 63 of the screen transmitting capacity

Golder Associates


A well head assessment for Well No1 was completed as part of the site reconnaissance conducted by Golder on July 18 2008 The assessment was conducted for the purpose of determining whether the Well is completed in accordance with the guidelines of the GWPR The assessment was based on a visual inspection of the well and information available on the well record It should be noted that any well constructed prior to the enactment of the GWPR in 2005 is not required to meet the guidelines unless work is undertaken on the well however the assessment is useful for determining potential risks of contamination to the well for groundwater protection purposes Based on the available information Well No1 meets the GWPR requirements for flood proofing however a well ID plate is not present and the presence of a surface seal could not be verified Based on the age of the well (1995) it is inferred that a surface seal may not be present as this requirement was not in place prior to 2005

During the site reconnaissance an attempt was made to measure the static water level in the Well however the access port in the well cap was not large enough to allow passage of the water level tape

512 Well NO2

According to Kala (1995a) very little information is available regarding the construction of Well No2 other than it is apparently constructed of 200 mm casing and based on Kalas field measurements is completed to a depth of at least 168 m The type of well screen used in the construction is not known According to Mr Madder Well No2 was constructed for a private land developer and later acquired by the Village

On March 23 1995 Kala conducted a 22-hour pumping test on the well at a pumping rate of 87 LIs (138 USgpm) The total drawdown observed during the test was 66 m and complete recovery was achieved after three minutes following the cessation of pumping Based on the pumping test results Kala recommended a long-term pumping rate of 76 LIs (120 USgpm) which was based on utilizing 73 percent of available drawdown and an assumption that the top of the well screen or perforated section of well casing was located at 168 m below ground surface

According to Mr Boltz Well No2 is utilized during the winter months generally from the end of December until the beginning of April when there is little irrigation demand in the community The average pumping rate of the well is approximately 38 LIs (60 USgpm) which is approximately 50 of the recommended long-term pumping rate determined by Kala

A well head assessment for Well No2 was completed as part of the site reconnaissance conducted by Golder on July 18 2008 The assessment was conducted for the same purpose and in the same manner as described in Section 511 Based on the available

Golder Associates


information Well No2 meets the GWPR requirements for flood proofing in that the stickup is sufficient and the site grading directs water away from the well In addition a well ID plate is not present and the presence of a surface seal could not be verified Although the exact age of the Well is not known it was drilled prior to 1995 therefore it is inferred that a surface seal may not be present as this requirement was not in place before that time

During the site reconnaissance an attempt was made to measure the static water level in the Well however there was no access port in the well cap that could be used for this purpose

513 We1lNo3

As previously mentioned Well No3 identified by the Be MOE Well Tag Number (WTN) 36524 is a former irrigation well that is not currently used by the Village A copy of the well record is provided in Appendix IV It is understood that Well No3 was drilled in 1977 and operated as MOE Observation Well Number 263 from 1980 until 1984 when it was acquired by the Village of Midway for use as a production well Apparently use of this well for domestic water purposes was discontinued when Well No1 was drilled in 1995

According to Kala (l995a) Well No3 was originally completed as a large diameter dug well and was later deepened by drilling to a total depth of 198 m and completed with a 300 mm or 350 mm diameter steel casing which was not screened but rather perforated in the main water-bearing zone

In 1981 the well was tested at rates of up to 427 Lis (677 USgpm) On March 221995 Kala conducted a 24-hour variable-rate pumping test on the well whereby the initial pumping rate of 144 Lis (228 USgpm) was increased to a final rate of 326 Lis (517 USgpm) in a step-wise manner The total drawdown observed during the test was 51 m Based on the pumping test results Kala recommended a long-term pumping rate of 303 Lis (480 USgpm) which was based on utilizing 75 percent of available drawdown and an assumption that the top of the perforated section of well casing was located at 168 m bgs

It should be noted that Kala (l995a) recommended that Well No3 be developed using a cable tool drilling rig prior to it being used as a production well as the test pump was clogged with debris during testing Golder could not confirm whether or not the recommended well rehabilitation was completed

A well head assessment for Well No3 was completed as part of the site reconnaissance conducted by Golder on July 18 2008 The assessment was conducted for the same

Golder Associates


purpose and in the same manner as described in Section 511 Based on the available information Well No3 meets the GWPR requirements for flood proofing however a well ID plate is not present and it is unlikely that a surface seal is present as there is an annular space around the well casing

514 Well NO4 (Abandoned Village Office Well)

A search of the BC MOE Wells revealed a well record (WTN 23000) indicating that a well herein referred to as Well No4 owned by the Village of Midway is located in the vicinity of 8th Avenue and Eholt Street near the Village Office During the Site reconnaissance Village of Midway staff were not aware of this well however a subsequent search of historic documents by the Village Public Works Foreman confirmed the existence of this well (Appendix V) It is not known whether or not the well is currently connected to any infrastructure

The BC MOE well record indicates that the well was drilled in 1969 to a total depth of 162 m Subsurface conditions encountered during drilling consisted of interlayered sand and gravel along the entire soil profile The static water level at the time of drilling was 91 m bgs The yield of the well estimated by the driller was approximately 3 Lis (45 USgpm)

52 Other Groundwater Users

A search of the BC MOE Wells database revealed the presence of74 wells in the area of Aquifer No 478 including one well located at the High School approximately 60 m southeast of the Village Well No 1 For reference purposes a plan printed from the Water Resources Atlas showing the well locations and aquifer extent is provided in Appendix II A cursory review of the well records indicates that the wells in the valley area of Midway are generally completed to depths of approximately 15 m bgs and that well depths increase to between 30 and 45 m bgs in the upslope areas to the north of the Village The depth to groundwater in these wells as recorded at the time of drilling ranged from approximately 35 m bgs near the Kettle River to approximately 23 m bgs in the furthest upslope well

53 Aquifer Transmissivity

In order to obtain an estimate of the aquifer transmissivity historical pumping test data for the Village Wells No1 and 2 (Kala 1995a and 1995b) which was provided by the Village was re-analyzed by Golder using the software package AQTESOLV Professional Version 450 Brief descriptions of these pumping tests were provided in Section 51 Due to fluctuating pumping rates and the fact that the test for Well No3 was of short duration (24 hours) the data collected during the pumping test conducted on

Golder Associates


Well No 3 was not sufficient for the purpose of determining aquifer transmissivity Based on the analysis of the above mentioned data the aquifer transmissivity in the area of Well No 1 is approximately 12000 m2day and the transmissivity in the area of Well No2 and Well No 3 is approximately 170 m2day This estimate is based on an assumed aquifer saturated thickness of approximately 20 m taken from the static water level to the base of the aquifer which for the purposes of this report is defined as the total depth of Well No The resulting estimate of hydraulic conductivity for the aquifer varies by an order of magnitude and ranges from 1x10-4 ms to 6x 10-3 ms

54 Aquifer Water Balance

541 Recharge

For the purpose of this investigation estimates of recharge to Aquifer No478 were made by estimating the volume of precipitation infiltrating the subsurface based on climate data An assessment of recharge based on the volume of water required to sustain groundwater flow through the aquifer using Darcys Law was not possible due to the uncertainty in the groundwater flow direction hydraulic gradient and hydraulic conductivity values for the aquifer

It has been assumed that groundwater recharge to Aquifer No 478 is primarily via infiltration of precipitation and snow melt to the subsurface in the Murray Gulch Creek watershed which according to information available from the BC MOE WRA is primarily located to the north of Midway and covers an area of approximately 30 km2 bull

The watershed area is outlined in Figure 3 Since Boundary Creek enters the Kettle River downstream of the Village its watershed area was not considered to recharge this aquifer

The distribution of recharge between the bedrock and areas infilled with alluvium is unclear however it is assumed that the aquifer is recharged in part by flow from the adjacent bedrock and that when lowered through groundwater withdrawal additional recharge will be induced from the adjacent bedrock Hence it is inferred that recharge to the bedrock is in part available to the alluvial aquifers

As previously stated the mean annual precipitation in the Midway area is 457 mmyr Based on basin-wide estimates of recharge from a study currently being conducted by Golder in the southern Okanagan Basin it is estimated that approximately 10 of this precipitation or 46 mmyr is available as recharge Furthermore of the total available recharge it is estimated that generally approximately 10 contributes to bedrock and that 90 contributes to alluvial aquifers Therefore a preliminary estimate of the annual groundwater recharge from the Murray Gulch Creek watershed is 1230000 m3yr (based on an area of 30 km2

) This recharge estimate is based on precipitation only and does not account for other sources of recharge such as contributions from septic disposal

Golder Associates


to ground and irrigation or the infiltration of surface water from the Kettle River to the underlying aquifer

542 Extraction

An accurate quantification of the total annual groundwater extraction in the Midway area cannot be made due to the absence of data concerning the number of private wells currently in operation However an approximation of the annual extraction rate was calculated for the Midway area by estimating the water usage based on measured pumping rates from the Village Wells and estimates of groundwater withdrawals within irrigatedagricultural areas The following outlines the assumptions used in developing aquifer discharge estimates

bull Based on pumping data provided by the Village of Midway the annual groundwater extraction for Well Nos 1 and 2 is approximately 347000 m3y

bull It is assumed that the High School well pumps at a rate equal to the yield estimated at the time of drilling which is 95 Lis (150 US gpm) for three hours per day for 200 days per year (5 days per week for ten months per year) This results in an annual groundwater extraction rate of approximately 21000 m3y

bull In addition Village of Midway staff indicated the presence of six privately-owned irrigation wells in the area of the Village Since the pumping rates of these wells were not known the annual irrigation demand was calculated based on the area of irrigated cropland within the Village boundaries on the north side of the Kettle River based on examination of air photos The area of irrigated tree farms appears to be approximately 475000 m2

while the area of other irrigated crops for the purpose of this estimate assumed to be alfalfa appears to be approximately 1380000 m2

bull The irrigation demands were calculated using the method outlined in the British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture Food and Fisheries Irrigation Factsheet Guide to Irrigation System Design with Reclaimed Water published in 2001 The estimated annual crop water requirement for the tree farming area is approximately 142000 m3

while the estimated annual crop water requirements for the area assumed to cultivate alfalfa is approximately 413000 m3

These estimates are based on a maximum soil water deficit calculated for a sandy soil and the average seasonal irrigation requirement for Creston BC which is the closest location to Midway with available information that is of a similar elevation and latitude Therefore for the purpose of conducting this water balance it is assumed that the annual groundwater extraction for irrigation purposes in the Study Area is approximately 555000 m3yr

For the purposes of this report it is estimated that the annual groundwater extraction from the aquifer is in the order of approximately 1000000 m3y It should be noted that the estimate of groundwater extraction for irrigation purposes is considered to be

Golder Associates


conservatively high as i) it is assumed that the entire area identified as agricultural is irrigated for crop purposes which may not be the case and ii) it assumes that none of the water from the Village of Midway wells is used to irrigate agricultural land in the Village Area

543 Net Water Balance

Although the exact volume of water withdrawn from the aquifer cannot be accurately quantified based on available information it has been estimated that approximately 1000000 m3 of groundwater is currently withdrawn each year from the aquifer Since the climate based recharge estimate indicates a potential recharge rate of 1230000 m3yr the annual withdrawal represents approximately 80 of the available recharge

The above estimate of the groundwater extraction as a percent of available recharge is considered conservatively high as it does not account for the fact that water withdrawn from the system by the community is reintroduced to the ground surface in the form of septic disposal to ground waste water disposal and irrigation While the amount of recharge from these sources cannot be accurately quantified their combined influence would reduce the total net water withdrawn from the aquifer

Note the water balance does not account for other surface water uses in the catchment areas such as licensed withdrawals from creeks and rivers

55 Preliminary GWUDI Assessment

A preliminary GWUDI (Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of surface water) assessment was conducted for the Village Wells Although no regulations regarding GWUDI are currently present in BC the BC MOE has recently issued a draft guidance document entitled Draft Guidance Document for Determining Ground Water at Risk of Containing Pathogens and Ground Water Under Direct Influence of Surface Water dated December 14 2007 According the BC MOE draft document a well can be flagged as potentially under the direct influence of surface water if it satisfies one of the following initial screening criteria

bull A groundwater well located within approximately 120 m from a cemetery or dumping ground within 6 m of a dwelling or within 30 m of a probable source of contamination (MoH 1996)

bull Any groundwater source or water supply well that has an intake depth of less than 15 m below ground surface within a floodplain area or is located less than 100 m outside the high water mark of a surface water stream or stream channel

Golder Associates


bull Any groundwater source or water supply well with an intake depth greater than 15 m below ground surface and is located less than 100 m outside of the high water mark and that are at or below the elevation level of the high water mark

bull Well with an intake depth ofless than 15 m below ground surface and is situated in a highly vulnerable unconfined unconsolidated aquifer or in a bedrock aquifer

bull Well construction fails to meet the Groundwater Protection Regulations

bull The well regularly contains Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform or E coli

We provide the following comments regarding the preliminary GWUDI analyses

1 The three Village wells are not located within 100 m of a high water mark or flood plain (as identified on the MOE WRA flood plain mapping)

2 Village Well No 1 has a well screen completed at a depth of greater than 15 m bgs

3 Available information indicates that Well No2 and 3 are not completed with a standard well screen but rather consists of perforated steel casing The intake depth of the top of the perforations is unknown however the depth of Well No3 is approximately 198 mbgs and the depth of Well No2 is at least 168 mbgs

4 Information regarding well completion details (ie the presence of a surface seal) does not exist Based on the age of the wells it is unlikely that a surface seal was constructed around each well

5 The three Village wells are not known to be located within 120 from a dumping ground or within 30 m of probable source of contamination

6 The 250-day time-of-travel capture zone for each of the wells (discussed in more detail in the following sections) do not intersect a surface water boundary

7 An examination of water quality data was beyond the scope of work for this project therefore it is unknown whether any of the Village wells contain total or fecal coliform andor E coli bacteria

As completion details for the three wells do not meet the BC GWPR (ie the presence of a surface seal) the preliminary GWUDI assessment would indicate that the wells could potentially be considered GWUDI Although additional investigations would be required

Golder Associates


to confirm GWUDI status for these wells this could imply that potential treatment (filtration or chlorination) of the water may be required by the Health Authority

60 WELL PROTECTION TOOLKIT

61 Step 1 - Community Planning

The development and implementation of the GWPP should be carried out with input from a wide range of community members Local government bodies citizens business owners farmers and community groups all have an interest in protecting groundwater in the Midway area for domestic agricultural commercial and recreational use At this point the primary focus in the development of the initial stages of the GWPP is technical and does not require the input from the general public However input from the public would be solicited as part of the next phase of the development of the GWPP (Steps 4 5 and 6) with additional members added to the Community Planning Team at a later date

Based on the scope of work for this phase of groundwater protection planning the community planning team consists of the following persons

bull Mr Jim Madder Village of Midway

bull Ms Jacqueline Foley Golder Associates Ltd

bull Ms Cheryl Unger Interior Health Authority and

bull Mr Oleg Ivanov BC Ministry of Environment

The purpose of establishing the initial planning committee is to define the GWPP objectives and methodology and to understand the technical issues related to the aquifer in Midway prior to embarking on public workshops to solicit stakeholder input


621 Time of Travel Zone Results

Estimates of the extent of a 250-day time-of-travel zones were completed for the Villages three wells using pumping rates of 134 Lis for Well No1 38 Lis for Well No2 and 172 Lis for Well No3 The basis for selection of pumping rates is outlined in Methodology Section 32

For the purpose of these estimates an aquifer thickness of approximately 20 m was used which is the distance from the static water level to the base of Well No1 as no information was available regarding the total thickness of the aquifer Because using a smaller aquifer thickness provides a more conservative (larger) estimation of the time of travel zone this estimation was considered appropriate for the purpose of the GWPP

Golder Associates


Due to the uncertainty in the groundwater flow direction the presence of the Kettle River which may act as a positive boundary condition and due to the large range in hydraulic conductivity estimates for the aquifer it was determined that the analytical method of capture zone analysis was not appropriate As such the CFR method was utilized Details regarding this method of capture zone analysis are presented in Appendix I

The 250-day CFR time-of-travel capture zone for Well No 1 has a radius of approximately 190 m while that of Well No 2 has a radius of approximately 100 m (Figure 4) Based on a theoretical pumping rate of 172 Lis the 250-day time-of-travel capture zone for Well No3 would have a radius of approximately 210 m (Figure 4)

63 Step 3 - Preliminary Contaminant Inventory

631 Results of Regional Contaminant Inventory

The results of the regional contaminant inventory are presented below and the locations of relevant land uses are provided in Figure 4

Existing Land Use

In general land use in the Village consists mainly of residential and agricultural uses with some minor commercial light industrial and recreational uses According to the Village Official Community Plan (Appendix VI) the immediate area of the Village wells is predominantly zoned Residential Rural Residential Agricultural to the north and west A small area of light industrial use consisting of auto repair and mechanic shops exists along Highway 3 to the west of Well No3 (Figure 4)

A windshield survey and subsequent interview with the Village Public Works foreman were undertaken on July 18 2008 in order to identify general business activities in the Village was conducted

The following land uses were noted in relation to the location of the Village wells and are shown on Figure 4

bull A gasoline service station is located near the junction of Palmerston Avenue and Florence Street

bull The presence of a bulk fuel station located near the junction of Palmerston Avenue and Cleghorn Street

Golder Associates


Contaminants of concern commonly associated with these land uses include fuel hydrocarbons oil and grease chlorinated solvents volatile organic compounds and metals

Agricultural Land Use

A review of the Village of Midway Official Community Plan (OCP- VI) indicates that agricultural land use predominates to the north of Highway 3 Groundwater contamination from agricultural land use can result from the use and storage of animal manure and the application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides The potential for groundwater contamination from agricultural properties can be low to high depending on the degree of compliance with the agricultural codes Contaminants of concern typically associated with animal manure include E Coli and other coliform bacteria antibiotics and organic nitrogen the latter of which is frequently a source of nitrate in groundwater The risk of groundwater contamination will also depend on the nature and volume of chemicals used and stored disposal practices and the presence and maintenance of storage tanks and on-site sewage disposal systems Similar chemical applications that are used on agricultural properties may also be used on residential lawns and parklands

Residential Properties

Numerous residential properties are located within the Village boundaries Residential properties were noted in the vicinity of Village wells No2 and 3 Some sources of groundwater contamination potentially associated with these properties could include lawn care chemicals common household products and wastes related to property maintenance and automotive repair

Recreational Parkland

Based on the Village OCP the following three areas of recreational park land were identified

bull The high school playing fields are located immediately north of 5th Avenue approximately 150 m east of Well No1

bull A municipal park located along Cleghorn Street approximately 50 m north of Well No2 and

bull A campground located on the north bank of the Kettle River at Florence Street

Sources of groundwater contamination potentially associated with recreational land use include lawn care chemicals

Golder Associates


Ministry of Environment Contaminated Site Registry

Golder conducted a review of the BC MOE Site Registry system which identifies those properties for which the MOE holds environmental information These records are limited to information obtained since approximately 1989 The existence of a property within the Site Registry system does not necessarily imply that the property is contaminated as under the existing Contaminated Sites Regulation the site registration process can be triggered by a number of mechanisms including property transactions and facility upgrades and not only subsurface contamination Similarly there may be a number of contaminated sites within the Village that have not been identified by the Site Registry

Based on the results of the search only two properties of environmental concern were registered on the Site Registry within a 5 kIn radius centered on a latitude of 49deg00277 N and a longitude of 118deg46298W The following summarizes the information regarding the two properties on the Site Registry In the documentation the locations of both sites were indicated as approximate Copies of the detailed site reports are provided in Appendix VII

1 Site ID 2529 This site is located at 49deg00511 Nand 118deg49270W and is approximately 1100 m to the west and outside of the Study Area boundary According to information on the Site Registry system the status of the site is identified as inactive-no further action Available information states that the MOE authorized a one time discharge of material to the air during testing and cleaning of a natural gas pipeline which runs parallel to Highway 3 Based on the nature of the potential contaminant source (gaseous) the one time release and the location of the release outside of the Village boundary it is unlikely that this site represents a potential environmental concern to the Village wells

2 Site ID 5108 The site is located north of the airfield approximately 875 m to the west of Well No3 The location of this property relative to the Village wells is shown on Figure 4 According to information on the Site Registry system the status of the site is identified as inactive-no further action The record states that a Stage 2 Preliminary Site Investigation was conducted for the Midway railway crossing realignment the results of which indicated soil contamination was present from hydrocarbons or heavy metals at a level above limits for agricultural use but below levels of concern for urban park residential commercial and industrial use Due to the reported removal of the contaminated soil it is unlikely that this represents an environmental concern to the water quality within the Village wells

Golder Associates


Sewer Systems

According to a representative from the Village the majority of the Village is serviced by a municipal sanitary sewer system The Village sewage treatment plant which according to Mr Madder consists of a clarifier and discharges treated effluent to the Kettle River is located on the south side of the Kettle River near the southern boundary of the Study Area (Figure 4)

Some properties within the Village limits are not connected to the municipal system and are serviced by private onsite septic systems Of these properties 18 lots are located immediately to the north and south of 14th Avenue and one large lot is located immediately west of 13 th Avenue These properties are approximately 400 m to the northwest of Well No3 In addition an area of onsite septic system use was indicated on a group of three small lots which are bounded by Highway 3 to the north and by the Village airstrip to the south which are located approximately 300 m to the southwest of Well No3 and approximately 600 m to the northwest of Well No2 Areas within the Village boundary with identified onsite septic system use are shown on Figure 4 It is understood that the campground on Florence Street is serviced by the Village sewer system and does not utilize an onsite septic system

Septic systems are common sources of groundwater contamination contributing bacteria viruses nitrates detergents oils and chemicals to groundwater Groundwater contamination from septic systems results in cases where systems are poorly sited designed or constructed where systems are poorly maintained or where septic system densities are too high to allow sufficient renovation

Storm Water Disposal

Golder understands that the storm water within the Villages boundary is predominantly infiltrated directly into the subsurface through unlined ditches adjacent to roadways

Storm water runoff commonly contains contaminants such as oils metals antifreeze and biological constituents which could potentially be transmitted directly to the aquifer at the storm water discharge location

Existing and Abandoned Water Supply Wells

According to the MOE WRA a total of 74 water wells (one of which is apparently an abandoned Village well Well No4) are present within the area of Aquifer No 478 (Appendix II) An inventory of these wells was not conducted as part of this assessment however it can be inferred that a significant number of these wells were once in use as private water supply wells prior to upgrading of the Village water system in 1995

Golder Associates


Presumably some of these wells may still be used by private well owners as a secondary source of water supply while others have been subsequently abandoned Based on discussions with the Village Public Works Foreman Village records indicate the presence of 32 private wells within the Village It is not known how many of these wells are in use however it is understood that at least six private irrigation wells are still in use within the Village boundaries The approximate locations of these irrigation wells as provided by Village of Midway staff are identified on Figure 2

Improperly abandoned wells can provide direct conduits for the migration of surface contaminants to the underlying aquifer In some cases abandoned wells are used for the disposal of wastes such as motor oil Because improperly abandoned wells provide direct pathways to underlying aquifers their presence represents a threat to groundwater

If some residences utilize private wells as a secondary water supply the potential exists for back-flow from the private water supply system into the Village water supply system

Transportation Corridors

Highway 3 is a major transportation corridor that is situated in an east to west direction on the north side of Midways downtown area It is located approximately 250 m north of Well No1 and approximately 125 m south of Well No3 In addition to a major highway two former rail lines and an active airstrip are located in the Study Area

As transport trucks and airplanes have the ability to carry cargo that could create a potential environmental concern if spilled these transportation corridors are generally identified as issues of concern within the area of water wells Fuel storage and fuelling of airplanes presents concerns for contamination by hydrocarbons Incidental releases of fuel and mechanical fluids from vehicles and aircraft can also impact storm water runoff which may in turn serve as a source of groundwater recharge In addition if the ballast materials have not been removed from the former rail lines these areas may be identified as issues of concern due to metal and hydrocarbon contamination commonly associated with rail ballast materials

In addition to the above based on our reconnaissance of the area around Well No2 it was identified that a dust suppression agent is used on the gravel road adjacent to the well house The specific composition of the dust suppression agent is unconfirmed

632 Results of Contaminant Inventories for Capture Zones

Contaminant inventories of the 250-day time-of-travel capture zones were conducted by means of the field reconnaissance and focused mainly within the boundary of Aquifer No 478 The inventory did not include interviews with private property owners or site-

Golder Associates


specific inspections Other than the information contained within the MOE Site Registry the inventory did not include a review of historical site activities The following table presents the results of the contaminant inventory within the various time-of-travel zones of the Village wells

Table 3 - Contaminant Inventory within Time-of-Travel Capture Zones

Well 250-day Time-of-Travel Zone

No1 Residential Land Use Agricultural Land Use Recreational Land Use

Residential Land Use

High School Well Private Irrigation WeIll

Potential Abandoned Wells I

Recreational Land Use No2

No3 Residential Land Use Agricultural Land Use

Highway 3

Former CPR Line Private Irrigation WeIll

Potential Abandoned WeIll

I Location(s) unconfirmed

633 Results of Contaminant Inventories for Well Heads

No additional contaminants of concern were noted during the well head assessment of Well No1 while the results of the well head assessment for Well No2 indicated that a dust suppression agent is periodically used on the gravel road adjacent to the well house The specific composition of the dust suppression agent is unconfirmed

Items noted during the well head assessment of Well No3 include the storage of a pail of an unconfirmed substance in the well house and the presence of a black tarry substance spilled on the floor in one area of the well house

634 Contaminant Inventory Summary

Based on the results of the contaminant inventory review it was noted that the majority of the area around Midway contains residential agricultural and undeveloped land In general land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zones of the active Village Wells No I and 2 consisted of active and potentially abandoned wells and agricultural recreational and residential land uses Land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zone of the inactive Village Well No3 consisted of residential and agricultural land transportation corridors (Highway 3

Golder Associates


and the former CPR line) and potentially an abandoned well Items of concern noted during the well head assessments consisted of the usage of a dust suppression agent immediately adjacent to the well house of Well No2 and the storage of a pail of an unconfirmed substance in the well house and the presence of a black tarry substance spilled on the floor in one area of the well house of Well No3

70 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this Study the following conclusions are made

bull The aquifer in the area of Midway (Aquifer No478) is a sand and gravel aquifer which ranges from unconfined in the vicinity of Wells 2 and 3 to semi-confined in the vicinity of the Village Well No 1 The estimated aquifer thickness is approximately 20 m

bull The Village operates two wells to supply potable water to its residents A third well is being considered as a backup potable water supply for the Village In addition a fourth out-of-use well was identified in the area of the Village Office

bull It is inferred that groundwater flow in the area of the Village is from the upland areas in the north towards the Kettle River in the south with a southeasterly component of flow as a result of the southerlysoutheasterly flowing Kettle River It is also expected that another component of groundwater flow is present in the area of the Village and is controlled by water levels in the Kettle River

bull Well No1 the main Village well was constructed in 1995 and is completed with a conventional telescopic stainless steel screen while Well No3 is not completed with a conventional well screen assembly and the well screen construction for Well No2 is not known

bull The average recorded pumping rates of Well No1 and 2 are 134 Lis (212 US gpm) and 38 Lis (60 US gpm) respectively

bull Well No3 was previously used as an irrigation well however it is not currently in use For the purposes of assessing a potential 250-day time-of-travel capture zone for the well should the well be re-commissioned a pumping rate of 172 Lis (273 US gpm) was utilized

bull The results of a well head assessment conducted on July 18 2008 revealed that the Village wells are not compliant with the GWPR Deficiencies noted were the absence of well ID plates and the likely absence of surface seals

bull Potentially a number of private active andor inactive water supply wells exist within the aquifer It is not known how many of these wells are in use however it is understood that at least six private irrigation wells are still in use within the

Golder Associates


Village boundaries

bull Improperly abandoned wells can provide direct conduits for the migration of surface contaminants to the underlying aquifer and private wells utilized can cause back-flow in to the Village water supply system

bull Based on the preliminary estimates of annual recharge and groundwater extraction the annual withdrawal represents approximately 80 of the available recharge however this estimate is considered conservatively high as it does not account for the fact that water withdrawn from the system by the community is reintroduced to the ground surface in the form of septic disposal to ground waste water disposal and irrigation

bull Land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zones of the active Village Wells No 1 and 2 consisted of active and potentially abandoned wells and agricultural recreational and residential land uses

bull Land uses of concern identified within the 250-day time-of-travel capture zone of the inactive Village Well No3 consisted of residential and agricultural land transportation corridors (Highway 3 and the former CPR line) and potentially an abandoned well

bull Items of concern noted during the well head assessments consisted of the presence of a private parking space and usage of a dust suppression agent immediately adjacent to the well house of Well No 2 and the storage of a pail of an unconfirmed substance in the well house and the presence of a black tarry substance spilled on the floor in one area of the well house of Well No3

80 RECOMMENDATIONS

The following recommendations are made with regards to continuing the GWPP process for the Village It is important to note that some of these recommendations may require the combined collaborative effort of the BC MOE RDKB and the IHA



Golder Associates



As the direction of groundwater flow within Aquifer No478 could not be confirmed due to the limitations in water level data (water levels collected at different times of the year and poor spatial data) as well as a lack of River elevations it is recommended that static water levels within the aquifer be confirmed This would include the verification of wellhead elevations static water levels within the Village wells and nearby private wells and surface water river elevations

As there are several groundwater wells completed within the aquifer consideration could be given to installing water level transducers in some of these wells to reconcile groundwater elevations and flow directions thereby accounting for seasonal fluctuations in groundwater flow directions

In addition it is recommended that water level elevations within the Kettle River be measured This could consist of measuring spot elevations at approximately three locations on the river at the time of the water level elevation survey One of these locations could consist of a marked stake installed on one of the abutments of the Florence Street bridge for the purpose of regularly recording water elevations in the River




4 GWUDI Assessment

Preliminary information indicates that the Village wells can potentially be flagged as GWUDI mainly due to the lack of a surface seal around the well As such it is recommended that the Village consider installing a surface seal around each well and conduct other works to bring the wells into compliance with the Be Groundwater Protection Regulations (Le ensure that all caps are securely placed place Well ID Plates

Golder Associates


on wells etc) Following confirmation of the groundwater flow direction and gradient the GWUDI status of the wells may be assessed taking into consideration the refined time-of-travel capture zones


The completion of subsequent Steps 4 (Develop Management Strategies) Steps 5 (Develop Contingency Plans) and 6 (Monitor Results and On-going Evaluation of the Plan) as outlined in the Well Protection Toolkit should be completed as Phase II of the development of a GWPP The following provides some preliminary comments regarding the scope of the remaining steps

Step 4 - Develop Management Strategies

The following section provides preliminary comments regarding the development of groundwater protection management strategies for the Village wells

Designate Groundwater Protection Areas

Following refinement of the capture zone analyses it is recommended that the portion of Aquifer No 478 in the Midway area be identified as a groundwater protection area A groundwater protection area may be defined on the basis of a time-of-travel zone a capture zone a portion of the aquifer or a combination of these based on local conditions Considerations for delineation of the groundwater protection area(s) include the extent and nature of the aquifer (unconfined to semi-confined) together with uncertainties related to potential seasonal fluctuations in the direction of groundwater flow

Develop Groundwater Protection Measures

Once designated groundwater protection areas have been established the Village can consider embarking on the development of groundwater protection measures Groundwater protection measures can be implemented at the municipalregional level through both regulatory and non-regulatory measures In our opinion while nonshyregulatory measures such as public education and best management practices can be highly effective some degree of regulatory control may be required to ensure the protection of the groundwater resources These regulatory strategies often involve the use of municipal land use planning and zoning bylaws to restrict certain high-risk land use activities within protection areas

Based on the results of the capture zone contaminant inventory abandoned wells private water wells agricultural recreational and residential land uses and the transportation

Golder Associates


corridor (Highway 3) may represent the greatest threats to the Village wells The development of an emergency response plan including spill response planning would address potential concerns related to the presence of a transportation corridor within the aquifer In addition the decommissioning of unused wells in the area would reduce the likelihood of potential contaminants entering the aquifer Additional information regarding well decommissioning is provided below

Golder would be pleased to assist with the development of specific groundwater protection measures once some of the preceding work has been carried out Some examples of groundwater protection measures that may be considered are presented in Appendix VIII These measures have been adapted from the Environment CanadaFraser River Action Plan (FRAP) report entitled Groundwater Quality Protection Practices (Golder 1995) which was prepared by Golder on behalf of Environment Canada

Decommission Abandoned Wells

Based on available information it can be inferred that up to 74 potentially abandoned wells are present within Aquifer No 478 (BC MOE 2008) including the abandoned Village Office well herein referred to as Well No4 It is unclear how many of these are have been completed as water wells or test wells versus boreholes (ie casing removed from the ground)

In order to ensure that an unused well does not pose a safety risk or act as a conduit for contamination to the subsurface the BC Groundwater Protection Regulation (GWPR) requires that a well which is unused for 5 years must be either deactivated or closed and a well that has been deactivated or not used for 10 years must be closed Note that a well that is actively maintained for future use or for use as a backup water supply is not required to be closed or deactivated

Based on the above it is recommended that Well No4 be located and its condition assessed Furthermore it is recommended that an assessment be conducted regarding the locations of other potentially abandoned wells and their conditions such that a determination can be made regarding the potential decommissioning of these abandoned wells

Groundwater Protection Measures at Wellheads

Based on the results of the well head assessments conducted as part of this GWPP the following comments are provided regarding the Village of Midway Wells

bull Consideration should be given to installing a surface seal at Well No1

Golder Associates


bull It is recommended that consideration be given to paving the section of Eholt St directly adjacent to Well No2 as it is understood that currently the road consists of gravel which is periodically wetted down with a dust suppression agent of unconfirmed composition

bull Due to the unconventional construction of Well No3 (perforated casing) the age of the well (over 20 years old) the Village of Midway may wish to conduct a well assessment in order to determine whether the well should be upgraded or reshydrilled using a conventional well screen

bull It is recommended that the substance being stored in the well house of Well No3 be identified and removed if it is determined to pose a hazard or if it is not needed at that location Also it is recommended that the substance which is spilled on the floor of the well house be identified and that appropriate precautions be taken when cleaning it up In particular it should be noted that water used to clean up the spill should not be allowed to enter the annular space around the well casing

bull It is recommended that the annular space visible around Well No3 be sealed with a bentonite slurry mixture to reduce or eliminate the potential for contaminants spilled within the well house to migrate into the aquifer

Step 5 - Develop Contingency Plan

The development of a contingency plan is necessary to ensure that the Village reacts in a timely and efficient manner to a contamination event in the area of the Village Wells The contingency plan would outline the events necessary to reduce potential impacts of a nearby spill on the water quality within the aquifer and the wells Specifically contingency planning involves developing a response to a range of possible contamination events identified for the each of the potential sources listed within the contaminant inventory In addition contingency planning identifies alternate sources of water supply in the event that contamination results in the temporary or permanent loss of a water well

The development of an emergency response plan is part of contingency planning Even under the best prevention plans a scenario that threatens to contaminate the aquifer may occur When this happens an emergency response plan directing a coordinated and timely response is an effective tool for assuring a continued supply of potable water Many communities emergency response plans do not include specific provisions for the protection of groundwater or surface water resources in the event of a spill or accident We recommend that the Village review and re-evaluate their existing emergency response plan (if one is present) and if necessary revise the plan to allow for the protection of sensitive groundwater resources as well as the entire water supply system

Golder Associates


Step 6 - Groundwater Monitoring

Although a detailed review of the Village groundwater quality monitoring program was not conducted as part of this GWPP it is recommended that a water supply monitoring plan be developed to monitor both water quality and well performance Some suggestions for the development of these monitoring programs are presented below

Water Quality Monitoring

Based on a review of the time-of-travel contaminant inventory results it is recommended that the following be considered to be included as part of the groundwater monitoring program

bull Standard potability analyses should be conducted at a minimum annually for any active Village water wells

bull A baseline analyses for the potential contaminants of concern should be considered for selected wells As further information becomes available regarding the use of specific contaminants of concern within the maximum groundwater protection area the baseline analyses should be modified to include any new potential contaminants of concern

bull Groundwater should be collected using proper sampling protocols It is recommended that a secure sampling point be provided within the water lines from the wells such that a water sample can be easily collected from each well

bull Groundwater samples should be submitted to a Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories (CAEAL) certified laboratory for the analyses Should a specific contaminant of concern be identified as a result of local contamination within the area the groundwater sampling frequency and list of parameters should be adjusted accordingly to account for this event For example if a fuel truck tips over along Highway 3 spilling its fuel load hydrocarbon parameters would be added to the list of required analyses at an increased frequency to ensure that hydrocarbon concentrations were not adversely impacting the water quality

bull Analytical data should be compiled within a database and reviewed annually by a qualified professional Adjustments to the groundwater monitoring program would be made if necessary

Golder Associates


Well Performance Monitoring and Maintenance

Routine well inspection (monitoring) and maintenance are mandatory in order to prolong the life of a well Any changes in the water chemistry and operating characteristics of the well should be closely monitored and dealt with promptly as both the well and pump can deteriorate beyond repair if problems are left unattended For non-domestic (municipal) wells completed in alluvial aquifers the typical frequency for major well maintenance is usually every 5 to 10 years Down-hole video camera inspection should be completed every 3 to 5 years or at the same time when down-hole pumping equipment is removed for scheduled inspection

In order to continue to monitor well performance it is recommended that in addition to the current monitoring of pumping rates the static and pumping water levels recorded on a regular basis for the in-use wells (Well No1 and Well No2) and that consideration be given to monitoring static (non-pumping) water levels in Well No3 as it is not in use Water levels can be collected either manually or using permanently installed data loggers within each well The purpose of the data logger is to collect water levels within the wells at predetermined intervals Water levels can then be downloaded monthly for review and analyses The purpose of the monitoring program is to continue to assess the well efficiency and determine if additional well rehabilitation is required

90 LIMITATIONS AND USE OF REPORT

This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Village of Midway The assessment was performed according to current professional standards and practices in the groundwater field and has been made using historical and technical data obtained from the sources noted within this report In evaluating the requirements for the Groundwater Protection Plan Golder Associates Ltd has relied in good faith on information provided by sources noted in this report We accept no responsibility for any deficiency misstatements or inaccuracy contained in this report as a result of omissions misstatements or fraudulent acts of others

The assessment is based on currently available information and does not account for mutual well interference between any wells in the Study Area nor for interference created by additional wells which may be constructed in the future It also does not consider the potential for other external factors which could affect the water balance for the Study Area such as climate change and additional groundwater or surface development in the upland areas to the east of the Study Area Additional limitation related to the analytical methods used for the delineation of time-of-travel capture zones are presented in Appendix I If new information is discovered during future work Golder should be requested to provide amendments to this report as required

Golder Associates


Any use which a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties Golder Associates Ltd accepts no responsibility for damages if any suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report

100 CLOSURE

We trust that this report meets your current requirements Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call

GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD

Pattie Amison MSc Hydrogeologist

Jacqueline Foley MSc Senior Hydrogeologist

Jillian Sacre MSc PGeo Principal Senior Reviewer

PVAJFJScfh

hnplcllpwslp724191 groundwaterproteetionplanIReportslFinal DraftMidway GWPP draft Oct 31-08 doc

Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES

British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture Food and Fisheries 2001 Irrigation Factsheet - Guide to Irrigation System Design with Reclaimed Water httpwwwagfgovbccaresmgmtpublist500series595000-1pdf

British Columbia Ministry of Environment 2007 Draft Guidance Document for Determininig Ground Water at Risk of Containing Pathogens and Ground Water Under Direct Influence of Surface Water December 142007

British Columbia Ministry of Environment 2008 iMapBC httpwebmapsgovbcca

British Columbia Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks and Ministry of Health Services 2000 Well Protection Toolkit

British Columbia Ministry of Health Services and Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection 2005 Comprehensive Drinking Water Source to Tap Assessment Guideline - Draft for Pilot Assessments

British Columbia Water Surveys Unit and Canada-BC Floodplain Mapping Program 1991 Kettle River Midway - Rock Creek - Westbridge Floodplain Mapping (including West Kettle River and Boundary Creek) and BC Water Surveys Data

Environment Canada 2004 Municipal Water Use Report

Golder 1995 Groundwater Quality Protection Practices Prepared for the Environment CanadalFraser River Action Plan (FRAP)

Kala Groundwater Consulting Ltd 1995a Village of Midway Water SystemshyPumping Test Program With Wells A and B April 4 1995

Kala Groundwater Consulting Ltd 1995b Village of Midway - Construction and Testing of New 12-Inch Production Well July 17 1995

Regional District of Kootenay Boundary 2008 httpwwwrdkbcomsiteengineactivepageaspPageID=16

Taylor R A Cronin S Pedley J Barker and T Atkinson 2004 The Implications of Groundwater Velocity Variations on Microbial Transport and Wellhead Protection shyReview of Field Evidence FEMS Microbiology Ecology 49(1) 17-26

United States National Weather Service 2008 Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service httpahps2wrhnoaagovahps2hydrographphpwfo=otxampgage=frywl

Golder Associates

October 2008 Table 1 bull Annual Pumping Volumes (2005-2007) 08-1440-0102 Village of Midway Wells

2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1

US gaHons m USgaHons m US gallons m m d Us

Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134

Mlell No2 7888980 29863 6696719 25350 6700760 25365 29863 90 3 38 Total 80428071 304453 90591372 342926 87243578 330253 347439 Not in Use 172

1 Calculated using data from the year with greatest pumping volume for each well during the period of use which is 2006 for Well NO1 and 2005 for Well NO2 -- - - shy1 1 lCab nZirontriStvoically April to December inclusive

IS typically January to March inclusive

httpcapwsIP724191gmundwaterPmtectionPlanJPhases and TaskslDatal gw recharge extraction estimatex1sPumping Volumes Golder Associates 011

October 2008 Table 2 bull Summary of Wellinfonnation 08-144D-0102 Village of Midway

Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)

Well Screen Construction Screened Section (m

bgs)

Recommended Sustainable Yield

(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)

1 - 295 300 Telescopic Stainless Steel Screen 231 - 295 n7 8 64x103

2 B ~168 200 Unknown Unknown 76 D 1Ox10

3 A 198 300-350 Perforated Casing Unknown 303 0 c

8 Construction and Testing of a New 12-inch Production Well Kala Groundwater Consulting Ltd July 17 1995 b Village of Midway Water System - Pumping Test Program with Wells A and B Kala Groundwater Consulting Ltd April 4 1995 c H~raulic conductivity could not be assessed using available information

httpcapws1p724191groundwaterproteclionplanlPhases and TasksJData Table 2 Welllnfox1s Golder Associates

E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o

IIDRAFTII ~ ~ ~ REFERENCE 1) COORDINATE REFERENCE UWZONE111 NAll83 3 MAP REFERENCE PRODUCED UNDER LICENSES GRANlED BY HER MAJESlY

~ Ttti QlAEN INRIGHTOf CNWlA REIRESENTEIJ BY TrlE IAPARTMENT I-_O_F_NA_TU_RA_L_R_ESO_UR_CE_S_A_~_B_Y_SO_FT_MA_P_TE_a-t_~_LO_G_IES_INC

KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0

PROJfCT VILLAGE OF MIDWAY GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLAN

MIDWAY BC

L

PAOJECml-~O-0102(2000 FILE ltIal4-40DI02_2000_Idwq

DESIGN PlA 20AUCOB SCALE 1~oooa AEI 0

CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN

CHECK FIGURE 1 K~ownosc_IAEAEWl_I J J

~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H

BoSE Cf RIVER ElEVATlClI511 m

LEGEND

VIUAGEABJLCCATlCN (STATIC vaTERLEIEtJ

~~ORQJICMTERFLOIiDRECllCN

parernAL SEASOHAL LOSSES FRCM

NarE 1)lOCAMNCFIilBLflIIIS8loSeD()IyenEULOOANOISUHCCIIIFRIED

REFERENCE I ) _igtTAOOT~)QltS

IORAFTlj

N

co VILLAGE OF MIDWAY GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLAN

MIDWAY BC

ltMVILLAGE OF MIDWAY WELL LOCAnON PLAN AND INFERRED DIRECnON OF

GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I

CALCULATED FIXED RADIUS METHOD OF TIME-OF-TRAVEL CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS

Method 1 - Calculated Fixed Radius

The calculated fixed radius (CFR) method depicts a circular time-of-travel area not taking into account the hydraulic gradient or boundary conditions and as such provides for a conservative (likely larger than actual conditions) estimate of the time of travel zones extent in the direction downgradient from the well However it may underestimate its extent in the upgradient direction The CFR method assumes the aquifer is infinite in extent and homogeneous in nature and allows the time oftravel zone to extend beyond positive and negative boundary conditions in a circular pattern Detailed (three-dimensional transient flow) modeling would be required for more accurate delineation Nevertheless time-of-travel zones based on the CFR method are considered sufficient for preliminary delineation ofwellhead protection zones

The CFR method is based on the following equation

10038 bull Q bull tr = _1-----=shynmiddotb

Where

r = calculated fixed radius around the pumping well (m)

Q = pumping rate (LIs)

t = travel time (usually in years)

n = aquifer porosity (for sand and gravel aquifer assumed to be 025)

b = aquifer thickness or screen length (m)

Limitations of Analysis - Calculated Fixed Radius

It should be noted that the calculated fixed radius method used to estimate the time-ofshytravel zones is a calculation that is based on simple physical assumptions of the aquifer system The CFR method assumes the aquifer is unifotnl and that the groundwater velocity prior to pumping is nil This method is generally applicable when I) the hydraulic gradient is relatively small 2) the aquifer is relatively homogeneous 3) the pumping rate is relatively high and 4) the pumping well is located at a significant distance from hydrogeologic boundaries Considering this the CFR method is considered to be fairly accurate for travel times up to 60 days Estimates of zones of travel in excess ofone year are typically a poor representation of travel time zones

In addition the calculated fixed radius method does not take into consideration potential interactions of the time of travel zones with large boundaries such as the Kettle River and Boundary Creek

Limitations at Time-at-Travel Zone Analysis with Respect to Contaminant

Transport

bull Time-of-Travel Capture Zone Analysis does not account for the dispersion of contaminants in groundwater Dispersion as a transport process causes a plume of contaminants to arrive at the receptor earlier than the water particle moving by advection only and causes the plume to spread at right angles to the direction of the groundwater flow Thus it is possible that contaminants originating from a potential source located within the wellhead time-of-travel capture zone will arrive at the production well at a lower concentration but earlier than that predicted by the model It is also possible that some contaminants from sources located outside (and nearby) the time-of-travel capture zone boundaries could cross into the time-of-travel capture zone by dispersion and then migrate towards the production wells

bull Time-of-Travel Capture Zone Analysis does not take into consideration the retardation and degradation of contaminants in groundwater Retardation is a process that slows down the spreading of contaminants in groundwater whereas degradation causes a reduction of the mass that originally entered the subsurface Both processes tend to counteract the effects of dispersion described in the preceding bullet Depending on the contaminant source the effect of these processes may be greater or less than the effects of dispersion

APPENDIX II

EXTENT OF AQUIFER AND MOE WELL LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY WELL TAG NUMBER

NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III

WATER WELL RECORDS OBTAINED FROM MOE USED IN ESTIMATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

Page 1 of2

~ BRlTrsH bull COLUMBIA

Report 1 bull Detailed Well Record

Well Tag Number 6024

Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot Plan 87 Lot 377 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BOGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007113 Well 9

Class of Well Subclass of Well Orientation of Well Status of Well New Well Use Unknown Well Use Observation Well Number Observation Well Status Construction Method Drilled Diameter 85 inches Casing drive shoe Well Depth 53 feet Elevation 0 feet (ASL) Final Casing Stick Up inches Well Cap Type Bedrock Depth feet Lithology Info Flag File Info Flag Sieve Info Flag Screen Info Flag

Site Info Details Other Info Flag Other Info Details

Construction Date 1950-01-01 0000000

Driller Osoyoos Tile Works Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 0 (Drillers Estimate) Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 23 feet

WATER QUALITY Character Colour Odour Well Disinfected N EMS ID Water Chemistry Info Flag Field Chemistry Info Flag Site Info (SEAM)

Water Utility Water Supply System Name Water Supply System Well Name

SURFACE SEAL Flag Material Method Depth (ft) Thickness (in)

WELL CLOSURE INFORMATION Reason For Closure Method of Closure Closure Sealant Material Closure Backfill Material Details of Closure

lscreen from to feet Type Slot Size

GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 5 Ft From 5 to 15 Ft From 15 to 20 Ft From 20 to 29 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 29 to 42 Ft From 42 to 53 Ft

gravel and clay large gravel and boulders some clay pea gravel and silt sand fine and coarse very dirty some water (very little) coarse sand with water silt and fine sand

httpa100govbccapubwellswellsreportldo 18082008

Page2of2

Information Disclaimer The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Information provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments

httpaloogovbccapublwellslwellsreportldo 18082008

Page 1 of2

uIt BRITISH ~ COLUMBIA



Owner CPR MIDWAY 1 WELL

~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 560 Plan Lot Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BeGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007111 Well 3




Driller Budhenning Co Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 100 (Drillers Estimate) Imperial Gallons Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 34 feet





IScreen from to feet Type Slot Size

GENERAL REMARKS


sand sand and gravel brown sand gravel hardpan sand and gravel sand and gravel

(fig) (cg)

httpalOOgovbccapubwellsiwellsreportldo 09062008

Page20f2

Infonnatlon Disclaimer The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Information provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments

httpalOOgovbccalpubwellsiwellsreportldo 09062008

Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG

Address OSOYOOS WELL AT MIDWAY

Area OSOYOOS

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 501 Plan Lot 5 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block 34 Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007112 Well 9

Class of Well Subclass of Well Orientation of Well Status of Well New Well Use Domestic Observation Well Number Observation Well Status Construction Method Drilled Diameter 60 inches Casing drive shoe Well Depth 63 feet Elevation 0 feet (ASL) Final Casing Stick Up inches Well Cap Type Bedrock Depth feet Lithology Info Flag File Info Flag Sieve Info Flag Screen Info Flag










GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 11 Ft From 11 to 15 Ft From 15 to 23 Ft From 23 to 46 Ft From 46 to 48 Ft From 48 to 49 Ft From 49 to 55 Ft From 55 to 60 Ft From 60 to 63 Ft

soft red sand coarse gravel big rocks and gravel fine sand sharp clean sand clean gravel fine sand sharp coarse sand clean gravel


Page2of2


httpa100govbccapubwellslwellsreport1do 18082008

Page 1 of2

dt BRITISH bull COLUMBIA



Owner DEPT OF TRANSPORT

Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot Plan Lot 377 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007111 Well 4




Driller Mads Jensen Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 15 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Minu Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 47 feet





Iscreen from to feet Type Slot Size

GENERAL REMARKS 3 EXTRA DOCUMENTS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 47 Ft From 47 to 76 Ft From 76 to 90 Ft

gravel and boulders fine sharp sand sharp blue sand


httpalOOgovbccalpubwellswellsreportldo 20082008

Page 2 of2

20082008httpalOOgovbccalpubwellslwellsreportldo

Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH

COWMBIA Report 1 bull Detailed Well Record



Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot Plan Lot 377 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BOGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007111 Well 4





PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yie~d 15 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Minu Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 47 feet











Page 2 of2

httpalOOgovbccalpubiwellslwellsreportldo 20082008

Page I of2

~ BRITISH ~ COLUMBIA



Owner KETTLE VALLEY SCH DI

~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 501 Plan Lot Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block 57 Quarter Island BOGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007112 Well 16





PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 150 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Min Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 26 feet






GENERAL REMARKS


top soil dirty sand gravel sand with cobbles medium - coarse sand coarse permeable sand clean sandy gravel

httpalOOgovbccalpubwellslwellsreportIdo 09062008

Page 2 of2


httpalOOgovbccapublwellsiwellsreportldo 09062008

Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner CORP OF MIDWAY

Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 501 Plan Lot Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block 27 Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007111 Well 5











GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 6 Ft From 6 to 42 Ft From 42 to 48 Ft From 48 to 53 Ft From 53 to 55 Ft

sand gravel and rocks coarse sand gravel sand

Information Disclaimer

httpalOOgovbccapublwellswellsreportldo 09062008

Page2of2

The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Information provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments

bttpalOOgovbccapubwellslwellsreportldo 09062008

Pagelof2

~ BRrrlSH ~ COLUMBIA



Owner GIL ALBERT

~ddress WHITTAKER RD

~rea

WELL LOCATION ~T~TTAT Land District District Lot 130 Plan 29558 Lot 2 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 092B053314 Well 9




Driller Tri-K Drilling Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 10 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Minu Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level






GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 200 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft

Depth of well Water 1 GPM 70 9 GPM 160 Total yield 10 GPM Mostly granite some quartz


httpa100govbccalpubweJ1amplwellsreport1do 200812008

Page 2 of2


httpalOOgovbccalpublwellslwellsreportldo 200812008

Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA

Report 1 - Detailed Well Record


Owner STEVE HUNCHUK

Address 18586 74TH SURREY

Area SURREY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 377 Plan 87 Lot 5 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block 3 Quarter Island BOGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007113 Well 11




Driller ABCO Water Wells Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 1800 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Hou Development Method Pump Test Info Flag Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 32 feet






GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 50 Ft From 50 to 63 Ft From 63 to 65 Ft From 65 to 106 Ft

sand silt clay intermix coarse sand coarse gravel

Information Disclaimer The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Information provided should

httpaloogovbccapubwellswellsreportldo 18082008

Page 2 of2

not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments

httpal00govbccalpubwellswellsreport ldo 18082008

Page 1 of 1

BRITISHbull COLUMBIA



Owner VILLAGE OF MIDWAY

Address BOX 160 MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot Plan Lot Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007111 Well 8

Class of Well Subclass of Well Orientation of Well Status of Well New Well Use Observation Well Observation Well Number 263 Observation Well Status Abandoned Construction Method Unknown Constru Diameter 140 inches Casing drive shoe Well Depth 65 feet Elevation 0 feet (ASL) Final Casing Stick Up inches Well Cap Type Bedrock Depth feet Lithology Info Flag N File Info Flag N Sieve Info Flag N Screen Info Flag N



Driller Unknown Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 600 (Drillers Estimate) Gallons per Minu Development Method Pump Test Info Flag N Artesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 31 feet

WATER QUALITY Character Colour Odour Well Disinfected N EMS ID Water Chemistry Info Flag N Field Chemistry Info Flag Site Info (SEAM) N

Water Utility N Water Supply System Name Water Supply System Well Name

SURFACE SEAL Flag N Material Method Depth (ft) Thickness (in)



GENERAL REMARKS OLD OBS WELL WR-263-80 AB84

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 65 Ft unknown

Information Disclaimer The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information prOVided Information provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments


Page 1 of2

~ BRITLSH ~ COLUMBIA



Owner SHELLY BEHL

~ddress 12 ST NORTH OF RR

Area MIDWAY





Driller A C Drillers Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached

PRODUCTION DATA AT TIME OF DRILLING Well Yield 20 (Drillers Estimate) US Gallons pe Development Method Pump Test Info Flag ~rtesian Flow Artesian Pressure (ft) Static Level 30 feet






GENERAL REMARKS


gravelly silty sand extremely fine silty sand fine very silty sand sand is a little coarser and cleaner sand is finer and siltier


httpal00govbccapubwellswellsreportldo 18082008

Page 2 of2


httpal00govbccapubwellslwellsreportldo 18082008

Pagelof2

cit BRITISH ~ COLUMBIA



Owner ALEX OLSON

~ddress BOX 141 MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

WELL LOCATION SIMILKAMEEN Land District District Lot 501 Plan 3 Lot 6 Township Section Range Indian Reserve Meridian Block 40 Quarter Island BCGS Number (NAD 27) 082E007112 Well 35




Driller Quality Well Drilling Well Identification Plate Number Plate Attached By Where Plate Attached







GENERAL REMARKS

LITHOLOGY INFORMATION From 0 to 66 Ft From 66 to 9 Ft From 9 to 29 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 29 to 39 Ft From 39 to 47 Ft From 0 to 0 Ft From 47 to 58 Ft From 58 to 70 Ft From 70 to 76 Ft

concrete rings brown sand brown sand and polished gravel little dirty brown sand and medium to small gravel brown sand gravel clean polished pebshybles brown clay compact sand brown sand getting cleaner clean -brown sand- some fines


Page 2 of2

From 76 to 82 Ft dirty -brown sand From 82 to 84 Ft grey sand -dirtyshy lots of fines From 84 to 86 Ft grey sand getting cleaner From 86 to 97 Ft dirty grey sand pasty From 97 to 99 Ft dirty sand and gravel -but getting clean From 99 to 103 Ft clean sand and polished pebbles and From o to OFt gravel very good From 103 to 106 Ft clean polished gravel and coarse sand From o to OFt some small polished pebbles From 106 to OFt grey sand getting finer

bull Return to Main

Information Disclaimer The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Infonnation provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments


Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS


sand sand and gravel clay gravel gravel


httpal00govbccalpubwellslwellsreportldo 20102008

Page 2 of2

The Province disclaims all responsibility for the accuracy of information provided Information provided should not be used as a basis for making financial or any other commitments __ bull __bullbullbull_ bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbull_ _ bull bull bullbullbullbullbull~ bullbullbullbullbullbull _ bullbullbullbull_ _ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull_ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull _ __bullbull _ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull _ bull bullbullbull_ bullbullbullbullbullbull _ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull_ bullbullbull_ bullbullbullbull _ bullbullbullbull 00 bull _ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull_ bullbull __0 bullbull _____ bullbullbull _


APPENDIX IV

WELL RECORDS FOR VILLAGE OF MIDWAY WELLS FROM KALA (1995A AND 19958)

--

---shy~-r~middot--~~jArrmiddot ~ ITI-- i ~L tao I L_U pound1pound1 ~ _L~Lj =U~

n-f rr[ II II~ waI_L iI LJ_ I i ~ L bull~ f N 1 tIlt1 ~ ~~--__

~ N~ -~ UI~L~middotmiddot 9J MI~ __ tftl_1 nc~t~rloIlmiddot 11 Ad ltI ~~ fJt _ _

~ce~I~~~CatLft_ ~~~-- == ~_~_~~ - ~ ---~ ~_~_ _ TyPE I lilW w1I 2 Aeconlllobullbull 9 CASNG I tA-aTeel (JGolOIa ) OWood Of WORllt 3 0 Dp n Ift MCllahlll lJPIbullbullI~ ~ U4 bull

--W-O-R-Ilt- - I ~I 111 2 Ci BobmiddotdO 3 DOmiddot M ~r 0011 --r=- I -l ~ ~~ middot METHOD bull iI Acgttary bull C1mv~ tr ~ __~_JC

00_ - - = Oi il tmiddot ~_ ~-t_I WATER i511 IIle a ~1Cipal 3 U tt9middot ion I iJ-i si -t- 7- ~

WELL USE a Coo loa WOIIU bull bull I bull _ I

DRIILING ADDITiVES r~~~I-- I middotmiddotmiddot_middot t- ~ middot =- = W~M 1__-_ __~ 1t1I MEASuREMENTS - (J 2 ~ltIt CgtlI09 1111 va ~I 1 U bullbull~ I rIlIIU aund ie1f_gIloCllll___ 7 _~ 1 nW d 2 WI II ONwZ lJlJled3 rJrnbullbulllIIIr f middoteWlll LOG DESCRIPTION I l PtfCltoli _middot__ bull__~ _

~ili oJ -- middotI~OI(II middotmiddottCc~ --~--~ I Ooltl -~~ 00 1____bull middot--11 middotOIati1I_--_middot_middotmiddot_1It

I _L2J amp-5 _-~ 1-- Gul__ - 2_ [J ~ fJfrr tInri- 10 SCREEN nfl_11__ 1 lJPI Sli middot 1- mJ 1--~fr-Js1L ~ r CCO~bull5 2tJerG~Gimiddot 1 L1Lamiddot Ie LV~ ~ Ie deg11th _bullbull bull - I 1IUoooo 1 rraquosr~ SJtIl I LJ PIIlie ClClfw __

lr itimiddot ii rr~s- -1 Sl~ Ito17~~7~~~~~ ~~~~_

~~~ii~-f~~ _ -- -j ~~~ -~_~=r~ scr~-~middotIIU~ BIrmiddot r 13 cr~ -~ 1$IOI~ii 12 ~ -~ ~ j shyirLUJ ~j bull qll iUJL l 1- frbullbull- ~ _ r bullbull bullbull bull bull bull _ II r --~~~ _ -7-1 t lCl_ bull l L_ t r t shy~i ~fJl6~tdoL Filllnll opLr ~_OIl~5olcr7middot~-shyP_IJIf - ~Z_4w~J~middot II ~tO B~-I ~~ ~ ~li~~9AI~-_~ ~-f--tclAUrL -[ - ---- r ~ Rii1f bull ~III 110_ _

pu I SIlf ~ ~ ~ ~ 12 niT I OPumpll o noll ~ [tM lo1L 1Lr-J _ I-~ ~~ ~ ~ l~ RItbullbull-~OII r_ _~c $+lill _ _Itmiddot

~1~k_~~l~f-it~~Ipound=t~~ ~~~~ ~ 1 tmiddot-middot ~r -_ ~ ~+ ~ rf~middotLi ~J ~~ q I~amp~ _lr~~T_middotv~middot-r~J 11 ~L~~ j~_ ~-~~L -i 14middotviA~~R ~~Il f~ 2--1bull~ ~ bull ri~ fI lr~ Qd_2nMr-r I _ middot~ltII_ VII 1 nllf I crshyL$~ atralJ(l__ --J 15 ~ATA AN6LYSIS _ IILL I I I ItI(JII ONIULTANT _ 311 I I I Jl ~ Olli 1 t J I tl - ~ fIH I ILI FlttJ lIel l 1 i-i

- l oNElL LOCATION SWITCH [illn 10 Nl= h----] u~1I1 ~ I~ J

ltl ~INAL W(Ll COIdPlnON OATA Nt PaPlh 1llJ-~2Jft wo- VoRl LLJ L_U U~~t

bull 110 r ll~LJ ~middot lLLI ua_ =middotLmiddot LW Ova bull_ _ I ----1

0 - WolI Cplolii W~w ~ti- -

IT 2h~A Jf fll-f4--f I I I J oti4F ~~N~ I I I~ SOOOlllutt

10 118bull CONTHAcrnfl RaWtlI _ middot J AI _m ~1 Umiddot

-

J Oll~ de 10

VIDdt tI~ W WIU Ottt II

bullmiddot -~~ _-~--~ r --~ ~ bull

Well No1

-

wCgtl=Od t~bre 1 Zt 11i E~S iOt fgt09 1 ~ ~I 3(HI $j-d ~ l~J 13rt0l31~ N1SSCR

-

~ IIDlln~ D Brltlln CDlul1lbll Mlnilitry 0 eVi~URnl Waott MonOlgDmant Branch

- WAT E R WEl L RECORD 0 LL~~middot -~~ bull~ ~ -Jw t t ~ -~ LU gtfImiddotImiddot~middot ~rll-r-middotOCamp4)A r S MAP t~ IE _ I bull L It loI1 1 L-r middotmiddotmiddotmiddot bull f -_ i1 r-- ---W U

I Z ~ l ~ t 1 ~ ~ 1 Oat IJ r bull _~ L~ _ bullbull bull t_ bull 1~_I ~ - - -J--o I _ rl _ d~rmiddotmiddotmiddot-_middotmiddot shy~~ N~ Abullbullr _ l)lJ~ Ip i11~av --_ lt -

onl 04((IIhOraquo Afi4l bullbull4 __ t~ 4C 1-_

-

~ ilooj

OJllfIiit IinbullbullbullII

IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull

_--- _---__-SlIo blmiddot_middot__ __ _ OpO Ilol 0middot_---10 II rJilmlltr bull IN

GrbullbullUImiddot~_middot_middot _ bull bullbull _

10 SCIIEEN 1 ClIollliaHTI1II_1 2 OPioS TljM 10COh_~ ~f1 UPoold 1 UIbullbullVN

0 ~~ ~ _ _ Maf~rlo11 CI 5 5 2 LJ Plbull nOltr_ $1 ~rre __ Iv - U blow ~rt lvI

~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy

fmiddotmiddot middott~-I =s~ -1middot ~ middotmiddotmiddot-rmiddotmiddot 1---p - - middotmiddot-middotmiddotf _

bull ta-~- -r ~__ _ __1_ __bull __bull

ONSULlAN r_ delrus

~ELL UCATION llMpound TCH

bullbullbull1 LIltI __ bull _2a q e - TYPE I a Nlw~11 2 a lII_dilll( 9 CASING USClI 2 UGolOftlnlNd l lJ~ OF WORK ) Q Dp 0 bo~ tllfial ~ 111011 ~J f_

WORK n bullbull 1 Z n amp s 0 J ~ fo lJ Qkbullbull ~rmiddotmiddotmiddot -~- fshy ~ ME THOD ~ flo bull U11fl 0 110 I Crtu w_ lt bullbullbullbull j In

1Qkor bull _ Oi4II i -u iWATER ClOlOImiddot 2 tJoId 0bullbull01_ Hom_i middotshy ~ - _1 --T-_~ L~

WELL usemiddot 0r poundhill 0OlIN 1 ID -i Lbull _ t I LjDR TMC_II r c It IILJNG ADDITIVES _shy bull bull _ bull _

~--~~----__====-_-r====~~==- WoIfgh 1It MampASUUENTSmiddotmiddot C1- CI~rlIQjlQIQl 9 PIIIil ~= IIIU-bullbull IC109d1

middotoUIIlIJmiddot_lIIlIO__ _0 1 nweI t Clcelt4 3ufft0IId I UN 20Ulad -0101 bull (l 6 wELL LOG DESCAIPTIOH SWI poollIs ~__ _

2LmiddotImiddot~ dJ-f -shy ~fVUL~~

i17i ~~L ft~~ Zi F(f =Js~~ -~ ~-tjJ

JfI C~ C - I =jI~3IIt4~ ~ fb Yo Pt- V(yen ~

- 1-~~~4~-i~~middotmiddotmiddot~ ~W 90 rr abullbull~_AJur JtL-Fj

I-~~~ ttMampL _

r11itmiddotd~middot s~- J~~JImiddot -lj wJI_ I bull

_ I middotfmiddot _ - --r ~ 11 DEVELOPEO BY IOs91Q I nmflftv 3 UAItn IIC1 ~__4- ~ _ ~ nAIII~Q bull ~up middotcllOlM

~ _ _ _ 1= 12TESTlrIPu2Clall SIIAIr -l ~middotLmiddotamp I_Jr-I

_ bull __bull __ __bull flail l~ ~~bullbullbull c SWIINoII a-f I -~ II f~ t 0 lor

bull Ii iiMiwoo~- 1 _- liiiCOVlflY in II~

middotmiddotfmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot --- -shy ~-shy mill Fl -~ ~middotr ~i~~- MI~ f - - I ---t-- -r I ~~ __1 --r

1middotshy ~~ J I~rmiddot- ~ middot~r~=--~middot 1-~dl middotJmiddot-middot =1 J WIIIER TYPE t [)rbull 2 n ~ Ilcta bull 0 f _ _ -shy _V --shy 11 bull c lIl 1n middot2011G

__ bullbull 16WATpoundRANALI$I$ 1 I~bullbullbulll I I LLIO a1 I II I~ ~ (IJ II I 1middotmiddot1

pM I I I I rioWOoI_L I 1middot1middotJ

1~1-=T~pound~I-)-N-o= ~=-J 11gt0011bull I ll I J I

1amp NAL WELl COMPLI( UON DATA Woll uotIlLI-LUff _v LLLL I J~QP

CI MIl I_IUIJJ ~- LJ IbullJ Ull_ =J l J 11 lllfC~ 111 __ _ ~~ bull

w If Camo PloP

11 ~mhlr~R I 11 I I t IlfH

I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld

Jmiddotbullbullbullbullbull_ 1 _ _

ltCd ~~$ e6T Zrlt ~~ Ol lD9 r CW 3~Qf Siolnd lild 71l1ll1311lM 5NlBBOil )IiOit

I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]

=~middot-1 tl q -~j -e -~l I

~1

~J lt1 ~~~ lt0 ~h IQJ

Cmiddotmiddot~I ~ ~ll

~~~

coi~I-bull bullbull i C) bull

~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c

~df ro)middot IZ I J lLNO I CJ~JlllnlMJmiddotL --zws WATER WELl RECORDmiddot

DEPT OF pound~Tt WATER RESOURCES SERVItE WATER INVESTIGATIONS BRANCH VICTORIA BfU11SH COLJJMaIA I I I I j I ~l

LEGAl- DESCRIPTIO LOT $E~_ TP_ R_ILL_ L~HD OISTRICT 3Hamp1f1IIff6IV~ I I I I I 1 I 8 oESCRlpnVE LOCAlIOM IZ Ie tt -t rat1pound df(teamp1 tI~ lUNCIIta__GATE_ z I lC I~ ~ rIObullH OWkilts AMmiddot WfIlje7tf--Mfifiiiy AODUSSIIiIiLl-campUAI_~O~-- lf=

DMaLUS ampat ~~ ADDReSS DATE COIIPeETEII IIAT ropo StClT 114 tl cent_ tAl

65 EIEVampTlOft bull bCSTIMATP 4 61 30 bull JiI T _ OF~ gt C$UAlPro USING Ptlt - LENGT efOGUCTCIt TIlT SUMampr

0amp11 --1 TlIOD Ol CONS11t1c1~( ss CASUIG DI IIIGTH-- _ ~E LOCATIO 0middot ScAeU a IIZpound LDIGTH TTPE ~ =~=i=U=IUIIP==lpound=o5T==rl--Dllb==-=tF=TUT=---------I=rSlNTAIIY iI C NaCo SCIlfbullbull= u LENGTH T~I _ Il4Tl degflAWDOWN -I p~ CASlNampOmiddotUNGTH PERnAATIGII$ FROM TO _ WATER EVIL ATCOIItPlETlOH OF TGt -f

GflAYII PAcK C LCNGlM ~ 011 al E ltUbullbull - _ AVAIUILDItMfDOIfH SPlClAC ~-----IfIPIIaUTt =maJrAGE ~ _I IMSTAIICE TO WATEfI 241 bull -d ATpoundG _Tell uva T-saasSNl1t - FROM nc-~middotmiddotmiddot a~~SUAEO ILEVATO ARTUIM RISSua~_

~PDED PURPIM UTE (pQQ JPlDA~ OF W4TU1IYEI E4~eEiT WATU USE OBS ~- f)G~ RECOIlUIENDU PuMP UTfIG

IITHOIDGTQEMISTft ~ 014110111 ITUT Irt DAT~

TaTAL $50180 ~os ~~~ ~ M _ $ LICA UIIOIJ -It 0-(-$ fiiiJitiltilMlfJ~

COIIDUcTAICCE T Q-C TOTAL _IFII n TOTAL MAIIDNiSS rCDCOs IDtl

roTAamp AUCNITY lCD~) -tn IN AUUNITY ICa COgt (MARGAHISIlMo I I l I r COLCNA OOOU bullgt lUReaITY _

AMIONS Ill Jft SAIIONS - I I AJlUrIolp t4$ ANI -f ~CAIIOHAT (COs) CAlCIVIl Ie _--_ lOn bull ~8artATE (HC~)

SUUHATpound (SoJ ~~~~9)j~ ~ I4)fuSlVM1J(l __

NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ

CIIaOAID lei) ADlilDlaaWoJ _

TlC8 nnTllOtEllJ IAI ~ii14 - ~~~ IPHOSPMGIIUS (PI ClOt eI --E9ampCHEMIIiTRY 51 Tl _NO ~____ _ 1- ~ TO TaTAl auELaAft1 ITRaCiEN aN7iI ~

NO bull IIITIIIT E NOa bull NITRATE MEI3ltL N9

CMJMISTRJ FIEU TESTjmiddot Jar ~ MIiIIaamp _ ~ TaT BY DATE EO~JIIIUr~sED _ _Z~liI6r~

~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =

DDRILL ~ DPUMl TEST IMTA WI-~~___=~~~------- Z QSIEVE ANALY515 C GDlfIMtSICAL LOGS Wl~~~~~~4tt-------- ~

OTHlaquoR ftAu C4lMW 1fIIIItC

ISCMtCES bull IIIFQRIIIoIQH a==riiiiii -- - ~_-_ 1

APPENDIX V

DOCUMENT EXCERPTS PROVIDED BY VILLAGE OF MIDWAY CONFIRMING EXISTENCE OF WELL NO4

t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _

- EXISTING SYSTEM ANALYSIS1 J

1

oJbull 31 GENERAL

1 Theexist~syst~ analYsis presentec1 herein is baset1 on a review of

~~ utlli~ d~awi~9smiddots~lied ~ thevi11Bge of Midway ~~ update middot~(jf middotthebull

fnformatiQn ooribli~ed in the 1977 UMAsY~en R~pQrtmiddot -] ~ ~

S~i 32 WNmaSDPyenLY AND DIMmS=ON bullbullbullbullbull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bullbullbull bull bullbull

J middot middotAl middotdorne~tl~middot water formiddottb~middot-VH1age is6bt~in~d frcm~il$gt~k ~ -

reoili~ces bayet~eirownlls ~ni1epart of~th

~ven~e lsecviced bya _

J middot ~~middot~i~~ge abo~ t~ o~er ~~ll~ bull well t2 ~~middotl~at~r-earmiddot~i9h~middotmiddot bull A-venue at ~holt street arid hasmiddota repor~ed capacityof about middot75 LIs ClOD - middot_Imiddot~iljmiddotmiddot~ithmiddot~middotmiddotmiddot75HP~middotWh~i~middot~~iimiddot3~smiddot_lQC~t~middot~~middot~~middotmiddot~~i~~Ymiddotmiddot bull middotmiddot - bull ltl tr~eks ~ ~a8 a middotrePotted ca~city- o~ ~~5 i)smiddotC600 I~LmiddotmiddotmiddotBOthweiis middot

~

if middotwith one 47 LIs (625 I 9PJi) fire truckmiddot The fire middottruck has a 4500 litre

J ~i~D09~l~~er~middotgti imiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotii I j -~

~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102

7 ndEpound-poundmiddot790i-i----7

HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~

cshy~shy ~ ~ ~- ~ Ashy t _ ltf ~~ 1or )~~

~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t

~ 1 amp ~ --c - ~raquo~ Jamp~ sbull

V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC

middot--~I bull ~ V _~l _tf$o~ bull ~~

bullpound ~t ~ iP ~ ~ )- ~l- ~~ fi

l ~ ~~ ~ ~ A~W tJ7 amp o~~ A llt-bullbull bull~ ~yt lt

STORAClE COC TIlAIlSMISSI81l1TY II I JlIMARXgmiddot amp4 Q Vc 4~tZ lt47 (

I mlaquotM 2lteulttrCM csrPAeuro-lgt

Tololl lJiolillityen

pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA

CARD 8yA aATlt4~~th~ -~ ~

saURCIES rHIORMATlO amp~ J~ laquoL~6

SIZe AtAITIS ETC shy --------shy

PUMPING TEST SUARY

PltCIFIC CAPACITY PIERMlA8nITt _

QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy

NVd AlINnIllIllO~VI~IIIO AVMOIIII 10 3~VIA

IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy

800~ 9 Alnr Hgt~V3S 3SV8V1VO A~ISI~3~ 311S 031VNIWVINOgt 30W gt8

IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I

J of JUL 06 2008 Be Online Site Registry 08-07-07 For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA) 140725

Folio page 1i Detail Report

SITE LOCATIONfI

Site ID 5108 Latitude 49d oom 447s victoria File Longitude 11Sd 47m ~9Ss

Regional File 26250-205108 Region PBNTICTON SOUTHERN INTERIOR

Site Address HIGHWAY 3 City MIDWAY ProvState Be

Postal Code VOH 1MO

Registered JUL 25 1998 Updated JAN 31 2002 Detail Removed JAN 30 2002

Notations 1 Participants 3 Associated Sites a Documents 1 Susp Land Use 1 Parcel Descriptions 1

Location oescription Ii OF THE AIRFIELD LATLONG DERIVED BY Be BNVIROmmNT REFERENCING DIGITAL TRIM MAP COVERAGES NAD 83 - 120000 SCALE

Record Status INACTIVE - NO FURTHER ACTION Fee category UNRANKBD

= bull bull bull =bull bull a = bull = bull = bull =bull = == = == ~ = = = = z = == = bull = ~ = c bull = NOTATIONS

Notation Type SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED Notation Class ADMINISTRATIVE

Initiated APR 28 1998 Approved APR 28 199B

Ministry Contact VERGAMINI DON (PENTICTON)

Notation Participants Notation Roles MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS (~ELSON) SUBMITTED BY

Note TITLE PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION - STAGE 2 MIDWAY RAILWAY CROSSING REALIGNMENT KOOTENAY BOUNDRY DISTRICT MARCH 24 1998 INVESTIGATION SOBMITTED FOR INFO~TION ONLY - THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT LANDS PARKS WAS NOT ASKED TO REVIEW OR C~ ON THE REPORT

Required Actions THE REPORT CONCLUDES THE ANALYTICAL RESULTS INDICATE THAT SOME LEVELS OF CONTAMINATION PRESENT FROM HYDROCARBONS OR HEAVY METALS ARE ABOVE LIMITS FOR AGRICULTURAL USE BUT ARE BELOW LEVELS OF CONCERN FOR URBAN PARK RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE

~

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT LANDS AND PARKS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE

REPORT NO ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION IS PLANNED PROVIDING THE SOIL WITHIN THE SITE IS NOT USED FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES = = = = - = = = = = ~ == = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = == == = == = = ~

SITE PARTICIPANTS

participant MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT LANDS AND PARKS (VICTORIA - REAL ESTATE SERVICES BRANCH)

Role(s) PROPERTY OWNER Start Date MAR 28 1998 End Date

httpswwwbconlinegovbccalcgiretrieve_objectcgiText+2FbcoJ2Fdelivery2Fb 07072008

I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy

As of JUL 06 2008 BC Online Site Registry 08-07-07 For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA) 140725

Folio Page 2 SITE PARTICIPANTS

Participant MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS (NELSON) Role(sl DEVELOPERASSOCIATED COMPANY

Start Date MAR 28 199middot8 End Date Note PLANS TO REALIGN HIGHWAY 3 OVER THE SITE

Participant VERGAMINI DON PENTICTON) Roles) MAIN MINISTRY CONTACT

Start Date APR 28 1998 End Date Notes CONTAMINATED SITES TECHNICIAN

bull bull = = a = = bull = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = == bull = = bull bull = DOCUMENTS

Title PRELI~NARY SITE INVESTIGATION - STAGE 2 MIDWAY RAILWAY CROSSING REALIGNMENT KOOTENAY BOUNDARY DISTRICT MARCH 2middot4 I 1998

Authored MAR 28 1998 SUbmitted MAY 07 199a Participants Role MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS (NELSON) AUTHOR

Notes SITE INVESTIGATION - NO REVIEW REQUESTED = ~ ~ = = bull = = bull = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = ~ = = = = =

SUSPECTED LAND USE

Description RAIL CARLOCOMOTIVE MAINTENANCECLEANSALVAGE INCL RAILYARDS Notes RAILLINE WHICH SERVICED LOCAL MJNING AND SMELTING OPERATIONS shy

ABANDONED AND DISMANlLBD IN THE EARLY 1900middot S bull = bull = = == = bull = = = = = = = = ~ e = = = = ~ = = = = bull = = ~ = = ~ = bull =s

PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS

Date Added JON 02 1998 Crown Land PINt LTO PIDf Crown Land Filel NAS108

Land Desc DISTRICT LOT 377 SDYD COLUMBIA amp WESTERN RAILWAY (CPR) RIGHT OF WAY

No activities were reported for lhis site

End of D~tail Report

httpsIWWWbconlinegovbccaIcgilretrieve_objectcgjText+2Fbcoloo2FdeliveryOI02Fbbullbull 070712008

I1

site Reg search- LaL 49 Long_ 118 (4)

I l

If l As of JUL 06 2008 BC Online- 5 te Regi stry 080707

For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KElOWNA) 133556

Folio page 1 2 records selected for 50 km from latitude 49 deg 00 min 277 sec

and longitude 118 deg 46 min 298 sec Site Id Lastupd Address City0002529 OlJUL12 HIGHWAY 3

MIDWAy 0005-108 02JAN31 HIGHWAY 3

MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3

As of JUL 06 2008 Be Online Site Registry 08-07-07 For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA) 140546

Folio Page 1 Detail Report

SITE LOCATJON Site ID 2529 Latitude 49d OOm 511s

Victoria File Longitude lI8d 4im 2708 Regional File 26250-202529

Region PENiICTON SOUTHERN INTERIOR


Postal Code VOH 1MO

Registered OCT 08 1997 updated JUL 12 2001 Detail Removed JUL 04 2001

NOtations 3 Participants 5 Associated Sites o Documents o Susp Land Use 1 Parcel Descriptions 2

tocation Description LATLONG TAKEN AT NATURAL GAS COMPRESSOR STATION amp DERIVED BY Be ENVIRONMENT REFERENCING DIGITAL TRIM MAP COVERAGES PIPELINE RUNS PARALLEL TO HWY 3

Record Status INACTIVE - NO FURTHER ACTION Fee category UNRANKED

z bull bull bull = =bull bull ~ = = = = = bull = bull = a == = bull bull === bull = = = bull === =bull =~

NOTATIONS

Notation Type CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM Notation Class ADMINISTRATIVE

Initiated JUL 30 1998 Approved JUL 30 1998

Ministry Contact VERGAMINI DON (PENTICTOlf)

Note THE STATUS OF THIS SITE IS CONSIDERED TO BE INACTIVE - NO FURTHER ACTION bull THE llIFORXATION IN THE FILE CONSISTS OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR MATERIAL PROPOSED TO BE DISCHARGED FROM A SEGMENT OF PIPELINE WHILEshyPERFORMING HYDROSTATIC TESTING AND CLEANING THIS WAS A ONE TIME EVENT NO REMEDIAL ACTION IS OCCURRING AT THIS SITE (A SECTION OF PIPELINE) AND Be ENVIRONMENT DOBS NOT REQUIRE ANY REMEDIAL OR INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS AT THIS TIME ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - shyNotation Type OTHER WASTE SYSTEM NUMBERS

Notation ClassADMINISlRATIVE Initiated APR 24 1997 Approved APR 24 1997

Ministry Contact NIELD ED

Note WASTE MANAGEMENT PERMIT FILE PA 13018 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE - CONTAMINAN1S TO THE AIR FROM A NATURAL GAS COMPRESSOR STATION LOCATED AT

MIDWAY FILE CONTAINS INFORMATION ON THE COMPRESSOR STATION RELATED TO THE PIPEtINE


httpsIwwwbconlinegovbccalcgiJretrieve_objectcgiText+2Fbcol2FdeliveryoA2Fb 07072008

Page 2 of3

- ~

As of JUL 06 2008 BC Online Site Registry 08-07-07 For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA 140546

Folio Page 2 NOTATIONS

Initiated JON 14 1994 Approved JUN 14 1994

Ministry Contact COLVEY DICK

Notation Participants Notation Roles HBT AGRA LIMITED (BURNABY) SUBMIlIBD BY

Note LETTER REPORT TITLE PROPOSED DISCHARGE OF HYDROSTATIC PIPE TEST WATER OOlLIRE OF THE PROPOSED STRAlBGY TO CLEAN AND HYDROSTATiCALLY TEST A 4 KM SECTION OF PIPELINE IN THE AREA OF MJOWAY INCLUDES LAB ANALYSIS OF SLUDGBOIL SAMPLES TAKEN FROM THE IN1BRNAL LINING OF THEPIPELINE = = = === = = = a = s = = bull = = = = = ~ = = = = = == = ~ = == = bull = = = =

SITE PARTICIPANTS

Participant Be GAS INC (BURNABY) Role (s) OPERATOR

PROPERTY OWNER Start Date KAY 30 1994 End Date

Participant COLVEY DICllt Role(s) MAIN MINISTRY CONTACT

Start Date JON 14 1994 End Date MAR 29 2002

Participant HBT AGRA LIMITED (BURNABY) Role (8) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSOL~TCONTRACTOR

Start Date MAY 3D 1994 End Date Notes DAVID KELLY

Participant NISLD gD Role(s ALTERNATE tfiNISlRY CONTACT

Start Date APR 24 1997 End Date

Participant VERGAMINI DON (PENTrCTON) Role (8) ALTERNATE MINISTRY CONTACT

Start Date JUL 30 1998 End Date = a = == = = = =bull = bull = = bull = = = = = = = = - - = = = = = = = = bull = = =

SUSPECTED LAND USE

Description PETR~LEOM NATURAL GAS OR SULPHUR PIPELINE RIGHTS OF WAY Notes HYDROSTATIC PIPE TEST WATER DISCHARGE - 1994

== = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = == = = = ~ = = PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS

Date Added APR 24 1997 Crown Land PIN LTO prDM 018786880 Crown Land Filet

Land Dese UYr 1 DISTRICT LOT 637 SIMILKAMEEN DIVISION YALE DISTRICT PLAN

httpsllwwwbconlinegovbccalcgilretrieve_objectcgiText+2Fbcol2Fdelivery2Fb 07072008

Page 3 of3

KAP52378 (SEE PLAN AS TO LIMITED ACCESS)

Date Added APR 24 1997 Crown Land PIN LTO PlOt 023141956 Crown Land Filef

Land Dese THAT PART OF UNSURVEYED CROWN LAND SIMILKAMEEN DIVISION YALB

As of JUL 06 2008 Be Online Site Registry 08-01-01 For PB92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA) 140546

Folio Jage 3 PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS

DISTRICT BEING THE BED OF KETTLE RIVER AS SHOWN ON PLAN KAPSS291

No activities were reported for this site

End of Detail Report

httpsIwwwbconlinegovbccalcgilretrieve_objectcgi7Text+2Fbcol2FdelivetyOIe2Fb 070712008

Page 1 ofl

As Of JUIr 06 2008 Be Online Site Registry 080707 For PE92096 GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD (KELOWNA) 133556

Folio Page 1 2 records selected for 50 km from latitude 49 deg 00 min 277 sec

and Longitude 118 deg 46 min 298 sec Site Id Lastupd Address I City 0002529 01JUL12 HIGHWAY 3

MIDWAY 0005108 02JAN31 HIGHWAY 3

MIDWAY

httpslwwwbconlinegovbccacgilretrieve_objectcgiText+2FbcoI2FdeliveryOIo2Fb 07072008

S3~nSV3111 N011gt310~d ~31VMCNnO~f)

iliA XICN3ddV

Village of Midway 08-1440-0 I02

EXAMPLES OF GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES

Drop-off at central depot outside of capture zone Collection

1 Hazardous Waste Mobile units that travel to various locations Collection days once or twice per year Best Management Practices pamphlets

Assistance Technical2

Training building and fire inspectors to recognize abandoned wells and USTs Agricultural consultants Septic system consultants Trainin~ for commercial and industrial facilities Donation3 Lan~Cquisition

Land exchange J1Y vJ1 Land purchase vJ

Purchase and lease back Encourage development in less sensitive areas

Development 4 Cluster

Encourage development where sewer extension is planned Int~ated Water Management Plan

Sewage 5 Stormwater and

Design standards for drainage systems and catch basins Control Regular inspection and maintenance

Upgrading and replacement Testing of stormwater and sewage discharges Permittin~ ofstormwater and sewa~e dischar~es

Containment and treatment of discharges Subdivision controls Prohibit dry wells and infiltration trenches Educational programs

Controls 6 Septic System

Technical assistance Water conservation Siting control Prohibition in sensitive areas Minimum lot size requirements Design control Restrict use by industry Extend sewer system Use holding tanks Operational permits Regular inspection program and maintenance program Inspection prior to property transfer Ban cleaners with organic solvents

Village of Midway 08-1440-0102


7 Agricultural Educational programs (working groups) Controls Technical Assistance

Best Management Practices pamphlets Restrict amount and type of chemicals stored Pesticidefertilizer application control Prohibitrestrict agricultural activities in sensitive areas Reporting requirements Research

8 Transportation Designated truck route Controls Designated rail route

Warning signs Speed limits Education ofdelivery personnel Training for emergency response personnel Road and maintenance repair

9 Well Drilling and Siting guidelinesregulations Abandonment Construction guidelinesregulations

Maintenance guidelinesregulations Guidelinesregulations for well abandonment Identification of abandoned wells as a condition of site plan approvalproperty transaction

10 Geotechnical Guidelinesregulations for grouting boreholes Controls Limit depth of excavations in sensitive areas

11 Forest Management Forest management plan Management to reduce the risk of fire Control of activities around streams Cutting restrictions Design controls for haul roads skid trails and log landings Control ofpesticides and herbicides Perfonnance bonds

12 Market Approaches Perfonnance bonds Surcharge on water use Penaltiesfines for non-compliance Financial incentives through tax credits Financial incentives through grants and loans

Village ofMidway 08-1440-0102


Non-degradation policy Quality Guidelines

13 Groundwater Limited degradation policy

Regulations

Zoning Overlay zones Prohibition of hazardous materials Prohibition of land uses Aquifer-wide protection area Protection area around a well field Large-lot zoning

14

Best management plan Design and

15 Facility Siting Siting Restrictions

Operation Controls Design and construction standards (ie secondary containment) Operating standards Permitting and licensing Regular inspection and maintenance Contingency plan Control type and quantity of hazardous materials

Materials 16 Hazardous

Registration and tracking controls (ie business license Restrictions renewal process)

Storage and handling controls Disposal controls Operations standards

Storage Tanks and 17 Underground

Secondary containment Pipelines Pressure testing

Groundwater Monitoring Permitting Fees Prohibition in sensitive areas Operations standards

Storage Tanks 18 Above-ground

Secondary containment Pressure testing Groundwater Monitoring

Permitting Fees Prohibition in sensitive areas



19 Sand and Gravel Security requirements Mining Drainage control

Mining restrictions Prohibition in sensitive areas

20 Inspection and Compliance

Fire Inspectors

Adapted from (Environment Canada 1995) Table 10 Detailed Summary of Groundwater Protection Measures


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Golder Associates Ltd (Golder) is pleased to present this report which outlines the initial stages in the development of a Groundwater Protection Plan (GWPP) for the three water supply wells currently owned by the Village of Midway It is understood that two of the Village wells (Well No I and 2) are currently used to supply domestic water to Village residents while the third well (Well No3) is not currently in use but is being considered for use as a backup domestic water supply well During the course of the development of this GWPP it was discovered that the Village has a fourth well (Well No4) which has been out of operation for an undetermined amount of time

It is understood that prior to the drilling of Well No1 and upgrading the Village water supply system in 1995 the majority of water supply in the Village was provided by privately owned wells and Wells No2 and 3 were only used to supply a small portion of the community The majority of homeowners in Midway have connected to the Village water system for domestic water supply however Village records indicate the presence of 32 private wells it is understood that at least six private irrigation wells are still in use within the Village boundaries

The objective of the first phase in the development of the GWPP is to assess the short term (250-day) time-of-travel zone for each of the Village wells and to complete a preliminary contaminant inventory within these time-of-travel capture zones

Results of the hydrogeological assessment indicated the aquifer in the area of Midway (Aquifer No 478) is a sand and gravel aquifer which ranges from unconfined in the vicinity of Wells 2 and 3 to semi-confined in the vicinity of the Village Well No1 The estimated aquifer thickness is approximately 20 m It is inferred that groundwater flow in the area of the Village is from the upland areas in the north towards the Kettle River in the south with a southeasterly component of flow as a result of the southerlysoutheasterly flowing Kettle River It is also expected that another component of groundwater flow is present in the area of the Village and is controlled by water levels in the Kettle River

Due to the uncertainty in the groundwater flow direction the presence of the Kettle River which may act as a positive boundary condition and due to the large range in hydraulic conductivity estimates for the aquifer it was determined that the analytical method of capture zone analysis was not appropriate and as such the CFR method was utilized to estimate the extent of a 250-day time-of-travel zones for Village Wells No1 2 and 3

Golder Associates










Golder Associates






4 GWUDI Assessment




Golder Associates


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE













Golder Associates




Wells






Golder Associates



Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134




httpcapwsIP724191gmundwaterPmtectionPlanJPhases and TaskslDatal gw recharge extraction estimatex1sPumping Volumes Golder Associates Page 1011


Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors











Golder Associates






4 GWUDI Assessment




Golder Associates


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE













Golder Associates




Wells






Golder Associates



Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors







4 GWUDI Assessment




Golder Associates


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE













Golder Associates




Wells






Golder Associates



Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors



TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE













Golder Associates




Wells






Golder Associates



Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors





Wells






Golder Associates



Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors




Golder Associates


10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors



10 INTRODUCTION




20 BACKGROUND



Golder Associates






30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors







30 METHODOLOGY



Golder Associates












Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors













Golder Associates
















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134




httpcapwsIP724191gmundwaterPmtectionPlanJPhases and TaskslDatal gw recharge extraction estimatex1sPumping Volumes Golder Associates 11


Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors

















Golder Associates











Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors












Golder Associates












Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors













Golder Associates







40 STUDY AREA







Golder Associates









Golder Associates







Golder Associates





511 Well NO1





Golder Associates




512 Well NO2





Golder Associates




513 We1lNo3






Golder Associates










Golder Associates




541 Recharge







Golder Associates



542 Extraction










Golder Associates











Golder Associates















Golder Associates
















Golder Associates







Existing Land Use






Golder Associates













Golder Associates







Golder Associates


Sewer Systems









Golder Associates











Golder Associates











Highway 3









Golder Associates



70 CONCLUSIONS










Golder Associates


Village boundaries






80 RECOMMENDATIONS




Golder Associates









4 GWUDI Assessment


Golder Associates












Golder Associates











Golder Associates









Golder Associates











Golder Associates








Golder Associates



100 CLOSURE






PVAJFJScfh


Golder Associates


110 REFERENCES














Golder Associates


2005 2006 2007

Greatest Annual

Usage1 Annual Usage

Period

Average

Pumping Rate1


Well No 1 72539091 274590 83894653 317576 80542818 304888 317576 275lt 134






Current Well No

Previous WeHID

Total Depth (m bgs)

Diameter (mm)


bgs)


(Us)

Estimated H~raulic

Conductivity (ms)






E 0shy

N

N

8 N

u o



KILOMETRESSCALE

I------0


MIDWAY BC

L



CAOO SWD J1ocrOll

KEY PLAN


~ ~

E ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

i ltJ

i ~ ~ ~

~

sect

8 ~i

middott s

~-

H


LEGEND






IORAFTlj

N


MIDWAY BC


GROUNDWATER FLOW

~ FIGURE 2 -=-- lie

~ sect

I ~

h ~

i

[i] a z

~~~~ gt

cO

~~~~I

llt ~f= O

~

JU

O

~5ai_

sect ~ I~~U4~5Ig~

lLtrgt

C00laquo

~~~~~

~ I~

2

l5ffi~5

~ e I~ Sf-laquo

~

shy~ih~

~ i f

M

~ ofimiddot~

~~

5~

i9 ~

z~

g ~

i

iih-

r sect

Ji~middotI~~

~~ i

~ i

fi1~

~ gt

~

I b

w rl~

t~ C

)~ I

~h

0 ~

~ ~

~-jjj 1 1

il-e-w

I~~r

J

Hi 8 f

I~

dz

--H~~

VI

W

it ~

z l 0 III 0 W

x V

I 0 w

~ ~ 0 z laquo 0 w

II 5 a laquo

APPENDIX I






Where










Transport



APPENDIX II


NH

1t

_N

I

-shy--shy

--shy

4fOO

N

NO

l1H

t

-fL _shy

1 -shy

4S-G-20N

~=-----~-7e-~-o--=-

I

J~

gt

1middot

IiI

~

iB~~r

bull-_-

---~

NO

HH

t

APPENDIX III


Page 1 of2




Owner L DEVINE

lAddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





~ddress MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS



(fig) (cg)


Page20f2



Pagelof2

~ BRITISH _COWMBIA



Owner JOHN LANG


Area OSOYOOS












GENERAL REMARKS




Page2of2



Page 1 of2





Address MIDWAY

Area MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page 1ef2

~ BRITISH




Address MIDWAY

~rea MIDWAY

















Page 2 of2


Page I of2





~ddress BRIDESVILLE

Area BRIDESVILLE












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA




Address MIDWAY

iArea MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page2of2



Pagelof2




Owner GIL ALBERT


~rea












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of2

~ BRITISH COLUMBIA



Owner STEVE HUNCHUK


Area SURREY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Page 1 of 1






Area MIDWAY
















Page 1 of2




Owner SHELLY BEHL


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



Pagelof2




Owner ALEX OLSON


Area MIDWAY












GENERAL REMARKS




Page 2 of2


bull Return to Main



Page 1 of2

cit BRITISH COWMBIA



Owner WAYNE RADIES

Address RR 1 OLIVER

Area OLIVER












GENERAL REMARKS





Page 2 of2



APPENDIX IV


--





















-

J Oll~ de 10



Well No1

-


-





-

~ ilooj


IIIloQI 100

O(QIII~bullbull





~ =J~ ~~N ~~

fi~ middotr- r shy



ONSULlAN r_ delrus












I-~~~ ttMampL _













w If Camo PloP


I I I I I I It

I 1

I I 1 I I 1119fllo

=-1

Oyn~GC tllWWOA

18 CONTRACTORAIld



I

~tL

I (~ I t- j ~ i~4) -1~J ~~ -~middott~

~~ ~~y~)I

f~ ~~J

~J --- ~ ~ ~1

~ ~t~ l II~~]

~~i11iiJ -shyO~ll Q)~ _ ~ ~]


~1



~~~


~

~) ~i~

1Oj CDl~ ~1~ Cf~1

~~oi

~ ~ ~J

~~1 t 1

c















NO -1110 CIIGGQlJ





~

(l~EHTS Qf fQLRE8 =




APPENDIX V


t ~

-It

-lt~j ~

-t ~ SECl~ON 3 _


1

oJbull 31 GENERAL









~



~~-

i l

--_------

bull -_~------- ~ I 7 eszc 6 0102


HYDR

OLOG

Y Be

B ~

I

0

O

~

~

bull0~

WA

1IR

QU

AL

ITY

bull

~

t bull

Of

~

~~

iI

lt

15

-~~

t

bull -

0

lt

t

-

5

~

-

~

bullbull

bull

~

--

j

~

bull

~

00

t bullbullbull

00

U1

1

HJ

diO

~i

rJ

Cii

v 9

X)~

a

i I

~ i

I ~

I

I c

=ft-~

i

1O

II

1

-1

I bull middot1bull

i

1

iI amp

l

0shy

a

8 I

i

8 w

(

cJ

i a

middotmiddot1I

ti

C

~

middotrJ

r middot bullbull

I

l

bull

middotl

I

I

gt

middotL ~

L

L

rmiddot L

middotmiddotci c

1 IL I

iLi I

1

l~ Il

- -shyi

middotiL

l

L

I

~L

-

L

L (

~~ L L ~uc(~

~~~~j~~

I

I I I

~- 9 tgtT amp~v~ ~ cfl AC _~ ~ _1)

~~

1~(~~~$F~~l~~ ~tI _~


~~~~9 ~rr~ ~~ ijf R ~ ~)i 0 ~t


V

~~ 8

) -_w i vshy _lI

~~ Ii~ e~ ~p JltjC







pOllllfad SooIliI

TIOI 01amp01

J[

~

so

HtOo

1100

If

a

Co

1Ii0r

aOGuJl _

1i16- e

I ANAIYSIS ~

------- -

JTIIee- HaI1I

--------- shy I ~ ~

~

OTHER DATA

~~Lb laquo1 tRA




PUMPING TEST SUARY


QAn 11 Na ----_

Tl1IT1IY -shy -shy

I

)

J f

~ J )

J

J )

1

~~

J

~j

II

bullr

1 1

-

-

127T

- - ~ ~ t -_

bull f a - w shy


IA XION3ddV

Ci d ~ II

I ~ampI )I 1

--_I_~

I

~ 11

--I

GI

II f

I I I r-shy


IIA XION3ddV

Page 1 of2jf

f i

I



SITE LOCATIONfI




Postal Code VOH 1MO












~



SITE PARTICIPANTS




I

I

Page2of2

r

i i

fshy











SUSPECTED LAND USE



PARCEL DESCRIPTlONS






I1


I l






MIDWAY

Page 1

Page 1of3







Postal Code VOH 1MO






NOTATIONS











Page 2 of3

- ~







SITE PARTICIPANTS











SUSPECTED LAND USE






Page 3 of3










Page 1 ofl





MIDWAY



iliA XICN3ddV
































Regulations


14


















Fire Inspectors
