relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

Upload: liparyan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    1/23

    1

    The Project Entitled

    AN IMPACT OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING

    IN B2B MARKETS

    is Submitted to

    ICFAI National College

    For The Subject

    Marketing Management - I (Sem I)

    Submitted By

    Rajat Patel

    Kunj Barot

    Priyank Patel

    Pavan Patel

    Guided By

    Shri Mohit Parekh

    Vadodara 390 007www.incindia.org

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    2/23

    2

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that the Live Project Report entitled AN IMPACT OF

    RELATIONSHIP MARKETING IN B2B MARKETS is prepared and

    submitted by the following students in the partial fulfilment for the subject

    Marketing Management - I (Sem I) of ICFAI National College Vadodara.

    Name Enrolment No.

    1. Rajat Patel 8NBVD004

    2. Kunj Barot 8NBVD018

    3. Priyank Patel 8NBVD031

    4. Pavan Patel 8NBVD128

    This is a record of their own work carried out under our supervision and

    guidance. The matter embodied in the report, to the best of my knowledge,

    has not been submitted for the award of any degree of any institute or

    university.

    Guide Center Head

    Shri Mohit Parekh Shri U. B. Pandya

    Faculty for a subject ICFAI National College

    Marketing Management - I

    Date:_____________

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    3/23

    3

    Acknowledgements

    The live project plays an important role to adjust with & to get experience of

    corporate world, and this project is no different. We would like to acknowledge

    our guide, Mr. Mohit Parekh, for guiding us in various aspects of the project.

    This project has taught us how to prepare questionnaire for the survey of our

    interest and how to interact with the corporate people for the same. And also

    the valuable comparison between theoretical knowledge of the subject & the

    practical aspects of the same.

    We are indebted to all those corporate who took time out of their busy

    schedules to guide us and to help us in our survey.

    We would like to thank Mr. Sanjeev Mehta, DGM, INEOS ABS (India) Limited

    and Mr. Snehal Joshi, Purchase Manager, Alembic Limited to provide us

    additional data.

    Finally, we would like to thank our college, ICFAI National College

    Vadodara, to give us such a graceful opportunity which helps us to enrich our

    knowledge of Relationship Marketing and to understand the theoreticalconcept of the subject in a better manner.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    4/23

    4

    Table of Contents

    List of Tables, Figures, Exhibits, or Appendices ----------------- 5

    Executive Summary ----------------------------------------------------- 6

    Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------- 7

    Objective ------------------------------------------------------------------- 8

    Secondary Literature Review ----------------------------------------- 9

    Methodology -------------------------------------------------------------- 10

    Limitations ---------------------------------------------------------------- 10

    Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------- 11

    Recommendations ------------------------------------------------------ 17

    Conclusion ---------------------------------------------------------------- 18

    References --------------------------------------------------------------- 19

    Appendices --------------------------------------------------------------- 20

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    5/23

    5

    List Of Charts, Tables and Appendices

    Charts

    Realization of Payment ( Turn over Basis ) ------------------------------------- 12

    Realization of Payment ( Type of Ownership ) --------------------------------- 13

    Tables

    Ranks of Factors ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 14

    Appendices ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    6/23

    6

    Executive Summary

    We have done a live project on An impact of relationship marketing in B2B

    market as an objective of our live project. We have gone through certain

    secondary literature review like Marketing Management by Philip Kotler to

    give proper direction to our live project.

    We have done a survey with methodology of stratified random sampling with

    25 sample size.

    This live project has certain limitations like time constraint and small sample

    size. It is really difficult to come to a fair conclusion with such kind of

    limitations. Even though with these kind of limitations we have tried to analyse

    our data in such a way that we can come close to a concrete conclusion to

    establish relationship in B2B market.

    From all such analysis we have given some recommendations in order to

    establish relationship in organization in such a manner that can be further

    useful to the organization for their progress.

    We have given references from which we have gone through in order toaccomplish our live project successfully.

    At last we have enclosed our questionnaire for the kind reference of readers.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    7/23

    7

    Introduction

    In a present scenario of such competitive market where to just sustain

    become harder day by day, Relationship Marketing plays significant role in

    business functions. Relationship marketing refers to understanding and

    responding to customer needs and preferences to build more meaningful and

    long term connections with customers. Attracting new customers are of no

    use unless you know the art of keeping them and from here the role of

    relationship marketing starts.

    The goal of relationship marketing is to satisfy customer in such a manner that

    he becomes loyal to the company and is unlikely to switch to the competitors.

    Relationship is just like chemistry bonding between the atoms but here atoms

    are humans (Supplier Consumer).

    As relationship marketing is growing rapidly with respect to B2B market, it is

    necessary to study the impact of the same.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    8/23

    8

    Objective

    As the title suggest the principle objective of this live project is to study the

    Impact of Relationship Marketing in B2B Markets. There are several other

    secondary objectives as a by-product of the principle objective, they are:

    How to do a live project with a team in a systematic manner and how to make

    that team to work in a same direction to achieve a target of completing the live

    project in limited period of time.

    How to do a survey to achieve better results and compare those findings with

    the theoretical aspects. By that way we can increase our understanding of the

    subject.

    The last but not the least is how to use knowledge of various subjects to have

    better results and conclusions.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    9/23

    9

    Secondary Literature Review

    To do our live project in a better manner we have reviewed some secondary

    literature, those are mention below.

    A thesis on Relationship Marketing Strategy by Patricia Sorce, Ph.D.,

    Professor, College of Business Rochester Institute of Technology.

    Putting the Relationship Back in Relationship Marketing by Andy

    Hasselwander, Vice President, MarketBridge and by Laird Rawsthorne,

    PhD, Associate, MarketBridge.

    The relationship between buyer and a B2B e-marketplace, Cooperation

    determinants in an electronic market context by Andrew Lancastre andLuis Filipe Lages.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    10/23

    10

    Methodology

    We have chosen 25 sample size and have made survey on basis of stratified

    random sampling. We have sub divided strata into further sub division like

    Sole Proprietorship, Partnership Firm, Private Limited Firm, Public Limited

    Firm.

    To do a survey we have prepared a questionnaire which is attached here with

    the appendices, in order to get better results. We have also used direct

    interviewing method with the company personnel of our interest, like Purchase

    Manager.

    Limitations

    In this given live project there are some obstacles in our path like time limit,

    sample size, and the initial response of corporate towards us. Less number of

    samples might not give a reasonable result and the time limit has bound us to

    visit more number of corporate and our informal approach (without

    appointment) towards them made our task more difficult.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    11/23

    11

    Analysis

    We have done our live project with 25 sample size and segmented it on the

    basis of company demographics like ownership types and turn over.

    On The Basis Of Ownership

    Sole Proprietorship ------------------------ 7 samples.

    Partnership Firm --------------------------- 3 samples.

    Private Limited ------------------------------ 6 samples.

    Public Limited ------------------------------- 9 samples.

    On The Basis Of Turnover

    Turn over < 1 Crore ----------------------- 8 samples.

    1 < Turn over < 100 Crore --------------- 7 samples.

    Turn over > 100 Crore -------------------- 8 samples.

    Other remaining 2 samples are of Taluka Panchayat in which one

    cant get the data of turnover.

    As Realization of payment plays an important role in relationship marketing in

    B2B market, it is an important factor to study. The data which we got we found

    that aggregate of figures says that mid term is the best option out of the

    options given in question 3 (Refer Appendices).

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    12/23

    12

    From the above chart, it is clear that in all 3 segments, Mid Term (30-90 Days)

    payment is the option chosen by majority and also holds true with respect toall 25 samples (Aggregate).

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    13/23

    13

    From the above chart, it is clear that in almost all type of ownership firms Mid

    Term payment option is chosen by majority and it also holds true with respect

    to all 25 samples (Aggregate).

    Here we can say that Mid - Term payment option is in the favor of both

    supplier and purchaser because 30 90 days payments term is more

    acceptable because it is not affecting profit margin of the supplier and

    purchaser gets the time to verify the material and on that basis he can decide

    whether to make payment or not.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    14/23

    14

    Ranks Of Factors

    LowerRate

    BetterQuality

    TimelyDelivery

    Supplier'sExperience

    AfterSales

    Service

    Supplier'sTechnical

    Competence

    Aggregate 3 1 2 4 5 6

    Sole Proprietorship 2 1 3 5 4 6

    Partnership 2 1 3 5 4 6

    Private Limited 3 1 2 4 5 6

    Public Limited 3 1 2 5 6 4

    Turnover < 1 2 1 3 5 4 6

    1< Turnover < 100 2 1 3 4 5 6

    Turnover > 100 3 1 2 4 6 4

    As we can see from the above table that Better Quality is the most important

    factor for corporate and After Sales Service is the least important factor.

    On asking to the corporate what do you expect from the supplier after

    completion of supply ? Majority says information about different products and

    market condition. E.g., Alembic Ltd., While 2 out of 25 selected very abnormal

    option i.e., greeting cards, gifts on the occasions and those two are Taluka

    Panchayat.

    In order to make bonding of relationship more strengthen, prevailing supplier

    has to provide some additional services to the purchaser e.g., free delivery.

    In this survey we get both the answers, and it is obvious that relationship has

    two aspects in corporate one is under table relationship and other is healthy

    relationship in the sense of business ethics. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 6)

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    15/23

    15

    There are 17 corporate organizations who are purchasing globally to meet

    their final requirement and they are not that harsh or unfriendly towards terms

    and conditions for their purchase from global supplier as compare to Indian

    supplier. We get the aggregate rating of 5.53 and 6.2 for global and Indian

    supplier respectively. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 7 & 8)

    Here from above paragraph we come to know that they are not much strict

    towards their terms and conditions because when we have asked them, areyou strict towards your terms and conditions ? They answered second option

    i.e., little bit (76%) , (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 9).

    All the purchasers believe in having more than one supplier. This may be due

    to reduce dependability on one supplier. But this is the factor which affecting

    relationship between purchaser and supplier by the way that relationship

    become weak to the some extent. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 10) I

    From this survey we found that by the way of advertisement a virtual image of

    supplier created in purchasers mind with some expectation like he can be

    technically sound, good managerial operations. Corporate find their supplier

    by the way of internet surfing, magazines, through references of others, and

    other ways like trade fairs, yellow pages, etc we found results 84%, 72%,

    40%, 40% respectively. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 12)

    In most of the cases (96%), we found that corporate buying from both of the

    manufacturer and traders. But they mostly prefer manufacturer in order to

    reduce inconveniency like timely delivery, quality, and better rate. (Refer

    Appendices Que. No.: 13)

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    16/23

    16

    In case of supplier not sending material on time or not sending proper quality,

    36% of corporate are charging penalty and rest 64% are not charging any

    kind of penalty. It is the advantage of relationship that makes the 64% of

    corporate not to charge any sort of penalty. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 14)

    We got very straight forward answer that in all the business organizations

    decider playing most dominating role in purchase system because all the

    authority of purchase the commodities or services are with the decider. Thatmeans if any supplier has to maintain a relationship in an organization he has

    to maintain with decider. (Refer Appendices Que. No.: 15)

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    17/23

    17

    Recommendation

    Personal relationship is also to be maintained to get the support and good

    coordination at the time of emergency so personal relation is also an

    important factor in the company to the extent it should not lead to corruption.

    In order to maintain healthy relationship between supplier and purchaser their

    should be some limitation or it should be up to certain extent so that smooth

    functioning of business take place at the both the end.

    They can use different combination of payment terms for the defensive

    relationship e.g., some percent of payment in advance and rest in Mid Term.

    By the way of advertisement purchaser should not make any virtual image of

    supplier because it is not practical thing and it is the first step to make bonding

    of relationship.

    They should look on the more technical competence of supplier in order to

    maintain positive relationship.

    They should charged penalty for better business practices and for better long

    business to business relationship.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    18/23

    18

    Conclusion

    In Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Firm personal relationship with the

    supplier is viable as compared to Private Limited and Public Limited

    Companies. Because in Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Firm, there are

    only 1 or 2 people plays the role of decider but in Private Limited and Public

    Limited Companies, there are members of board of director who plays the role

    of decider so there are more chances of disputes among them if one

    maintains any personal relationship with the supplier and gives order to that

    supplier, that can creates problem.

    Relationship in B2B market is based on main 6 parameters like quality, timely

    delivery, Rate, quantity, Suppliers experience, suppliers technical

    competence, and after sales services respectively. As supplier meets all such

    criteria more strengthen the relationship between the supplier and purchaser.

    Mid term payment option is offered by both supplier and buyer in order to

    make healthy and positive relationship.

    Supplier has to keep the healthy relationship with the decider because decider

    has the final authority to decide from where to buy ? Whom to buy ? And how

    to buy?

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    19/23

    19

    References

    Here we get good response from big corporate as well as Small Scale Units

    and Medium Enterprises. We also get some essential data from Dabhoi and

    Palej Taluka Panchayat. Other references are:

    www.google.com

    www.wikipedia.com

    Marketing Management, Philip Kotler

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    20/23

    20

    Appendices

    Questionnaire

    A Study on Impact of Relationship Marketing in B2B Market

    1. By which way do you purchase?

    Basic enquiry. Tender.From few selected suppliers of your interest.

    2. Criteria for selecting a supplier.

    Quality oriented.Quantity oriented.On basis of rate.Timely delivery.

    Suppliers experience.Suppliers technical competence.After sales service.

    3. Realization of payment to supplier from your side.

    Short term (15-30 Days)Mid term (30-90 Days)Long term (90-180 Days)Advance (Percentage of amount)Cash against delivery.Bank through.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    21/23

    21

    4. If any new supplier (who has a good reference) offers you lesser price andyou already have a reliable supplier, which one will you choose?

    Old supplier. New supplier (On trial basis).

    Not sure.

    5. After completion of supply, what do you expect from the supplier?

    A regular interval calls for new products.Information about current market condition for different products.

    Greeting cards, gifts on the occasions.6. Do you believe in personal relationship with your supplier?

    Yes. No.

    7. Do you purchase globally?

    Yes. No.

    If yes then how is your approach towards international

    supplier? (with respect to terms & condition)

    Unfriendly (Give your rating) Friendly

    1 10

    8. How is your approach towards Indian supplier? (with respect to terms &condition)

    Unfriendly (Give your rating) Friendly

    1 10

    9. Are you strict in your terms & condition for the procurement of products?

    Yes. Little bit. No.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    22/23

    22

    10. Do you believe in one supplier OR to have diversified list of suppliers? (i.e.more no. of suppliers).

    One supplier. More no. of suppliers.

    11. Give importance to the parameters listed below to judge the reliability ofsupplier.

    Least Important Most Important

    1 10

    Lower rate.--------------------------------------------------Better Quality.----------------------------------------------Timely delivery.--------------------------------------------Suppliers technical competence.------------------------

    Suppliers experience.-------------------------------------After sales service.-----------------------------------------

    12. How do you find your supplier?

    By internet.By magazine.By newspaper.By road-banners.Through firms (someones) reference.If any other way please mention it below.

    13. From whom do you buy?

    Manufacturer. Traders. Both.

  • 7/28/2019 relationshipmarketinginb2bmarketing-100106213826-phpapp01

    23/23

    23

    14. Are you charging any penalty in case of late delivery or not receiving

    required quality goods?Yes. No.

    15. Who plays dominating role in your purchasing system?

    Initiator Influencer DeciderBuyer User

    Companys Demographic Profile

    1. Type of Ownership:

    Sole Proprietorship.Partnership.Privet Limited Co.

    Public Limited Co.

    2. Type of Business:

    Manufacturing.Service.

    Professionals.

    3. Turnover: __________________________.

    4. Location: __________________________.