relationship between professional practice and academia in geotechnical engineering
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Relationship Between Professional Practice and Academia in Geotechnical Engineering
1/4
Session 7E6
International Conference on Engineering Education August 6 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway
7E6-1
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE AND ACADEMIAIN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Sanjeev KumarSanjeev Kumar, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Phone (618) 453-7843, Fax: 618-453-3044 [email protected]
Abstract - Three major responsibilities of assistant
professors include teaching or mentoring students,
conducting research to advance the state-of-knowledge, art,
and practice, and service to the institution and theirprofession. The main responsibilities of geotechnical
engineering (a branch of civil engineering) professionals
include helping their clients construct the structures by
ensuring the safety of their end users. Although, these two
professions seem to be totally different, yet there are several
similarities in these two professions, particularly in the area
of geotechnical engineering. The author joined the
Department of Civil Engineering at Southern Illinois
University-Carbondale after working with governmentagencies and consulting firms for over 11 years. He has
successfully incorporated his professional practice
experience into the Civil Engineering Curriculum at SIUCincluding development of a new course on Geotechnical
Engineering in Professional Practice. The paper presents a
critical review on similarities between two apparently
different professions, and how the professional practice
experience gained by a faculty member in an appropriate
setting is similar to the experience gained by an assistant
professor within the first few years of their academic career.
The review presented shows how professionals having the
same academic qualifications as entry-level assistant
professors contribute to mentoring of engineers,advancement of the state-of-knowledge, art, and practice,
and serve their profession.
Index Terms Capstone course, industry participation,
professional practice
INTRODUCTION
Science is based on empirical investigations and the
application of general principles to real-world problems
(Lowman, 1995). A study by Woods (1987) found that after
watching their teachers work thousand problems in class and
solving another three thousand themselves outside the class,engineering graduates of four year engineering curriculum
showed negligible improvement in problem solving skills .
Another study by Milton (1982) shows that only 17 percent
of 1700 faculty respondents at a research university use
essay tests and only 13 percent of them claim that theirquestions required problem-solving skills.
Professional practice can be defined as the act of
working first hand with situations for customers by using a
combination of highly specialized knowledge and skills that
are obtained through study, training, and experience
(Aldridge, 1994). Professional practice requires that
graduates from a four year engineering curriculum are
capable of setting up and solving problems which do nothave answers given at the back of books. The ABETs
Engineering Criteria 2000 places significant emphasis on
preparing graduates so that they can successfully enter and
continue practice of engineering and it is the responsibility
of the institution to satisfy these criteria. Therefore,
participation of the industry and/or professionals in
engineering education has become an integral part of
engineering curriculum.
It is a famous quote that Every structure issupported on soils or rock. Those that arent, either fly, float,
or fall over. Soils are natural deposits on which humans
have no control. Soils at no two sites are likely to be thesame. Even, at a particular point at a site, different types of
soils exist at different depths. Several theories and formulas
have been developed since the birth of soil mechanics and
Geotechnical Engineering in 1925. Most of these formulas
have been developed from experimental data on soils that
have some particular characteristics, which may or may not
be applicable to soils with even slightly different
characteristics. Due to this reason, Prof. Karl Terzaghi, who
has been recognized as the father of soil mechanics, in 1936
stated that the accuracy of computed results in GeotechnicalEngineering using theories and relationships never exceeds
that of a crude estimate. Therefore, principal function of
teaching theories in Geotechnical Engineering in a
classroom is to train students as to what and how to observe
in the field. Keeping this in mind, necessity of incorporation
of professional practice into the Geotechnical Engineering
curriculum has been recognized by both the academicians
and professional practitioners.
Industry participation in civil engineering,
particularly in geotechnical engineering, could be
incorporated by not only creating atmosphere where students
and professionals interact on a regular basis but also, by
actively involving the professional in developing thecurriculum. In addition, having faculty members with
professional experience significantly enhances the quality of
instruction in geotechnical engineering. Based on a critical
review of primary duties of professionals and university
professors in a teaching and research university (hereinreferred to as academicians), the author has concluded that
there are enormous similarities between these two
professions, particularly in the area of geotechnical
engineering. Similarities observed by the author in terms of
-
7/29/2019 Relationship Between Professional Practice and Academia in Geotechnical Engineering
2/4
Session 7E6
International Conference on Engineering Education August 6 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway
7E6-2
teaching, research, and service are presented herein. The
comparison presented in this paper is intended to
demonstrate the similarities between the duties of
professional practitioner and an assistant professor within
few years of his/her academic career; both having the same
academic qualifications. The similarities presented may not
be appropriate for comparison of the duties of senior
professors.
TEACHING
In a four year engineering school, primary teachingresponsibilities of teachers include but are not limited to
direct class room teaching, advising undergraduate and
graduate students, and developing and modifying curriculum
to satisfy the needs of internal and external clients. How
academicians and professional practitioners contribute to
direct and indirect teaching is presented in the following
sections. It must be recognized that fulltime assignment of a
professional practitioner is satisfying needs of his/her clients
by working on their projects. Therefore, the amount of directclassroom teaching is not expected to be the same as a
college professor. However, professional practitioners are
engaged in several other tasks which contribute to overallsimilarity in teaching between them and academicians.
Direct Teaching
Several professionals are involved in part-time teaching of
undergraduate and graduate students by associating with the
institutions in their geographical area of practice. Most of
the time, part-time teaching involves direct classroom
teaching, development and grading of homework problems
and exams, and assisting students with homework problems.This experience of professionals is similar in nature to that
of academicians. Most of the professionals, depending on
his/her level of responsibilities and years of experience,
present several seminars to their less experienced engineers
(in-house seminars) and to other practicing engineers and
students. Developing, organizing, and presenting these
seminars in a manner easily understandable to those who are
not familiar with the projects is similar to developing,
organizing, and presenting lectures to undergraduate and
graduate students in a classroom setting. Although, part-time
teaching by professional practitioners results in less number
of total contact hours with students per semester compared
to contact hours in an academic setting, but professionalpractitioners generally have significantly more contact hours
with engineers and technicians through project meetings and
seminars.
Indirect Teaching
Indirect teaching in an academic institution includes but is
not limited to advising/mentoring undergraduate and
graduate students, developing new courses, developing
textbooks, and reviewing manuscripts for technical papers
and textbooks. Similar to academicians, professionals also
serve as mentor to several entry-level engineers and
technicians. The entry-level engineers generally have BS
degree in civil engineering or related field (similar to
graduate students in an academic institute) and the
technicians generally have a basic education but no degree in
civil engineering (similar to undergraduate students in an
academic institution).
In geotechnical engineering, the professionals train
and mentor entry-level engineers by educating them on
fundamentals of professional practice, logging of borings,interpreting the data, identifying practical foundation design
issues, developing proposals and project reports, total quality
management (TQM), risk management etc. In addition, they
train their engineers on how to search for available literature
to develop solutions for relatively complicated problems, and
review the proposals and reports developed by engineers. This
experience is similar in nature to training graduate students
and reviewing their research proposals and theses. Training of
technicians generally include: explaining fundamentals of soilmechanics related to their assignments; training them in soil
mechanics laboratory; logging of borings; soil density
measurements in field; and design and construction issuesrelated to practical geotechnical engineering problems. The
contents of training to entry-level engineers and technicians
are the same as the topics covered in several courses in civil
engineering, e.g., soil mechanics, advance soil mechanics, soil
dynamics, foundation design, senior design (capstone design
course), and measurement of soil properties in laboratory.
Based on his experience in training engineers and
technicians during his professional practice career, the author
developed a 3-credit hour course titled Geotechnical
Engineering in Professional Practice. In this course, thestudents work on actual real-world problems and develop
scope of work, budget for the project, proposals, and final
reports, and perform engineering analysis exactly the way
entry-level engineers work on actual projects assigned to
them. Students are given opportunity to look at the final
products of practicing engineers so that they can develop
confidence in their own work. The contents of this course are
the same as those used in training the engineers and technician
in professional practice. This course was offered for the first
time in fall of 2000 and was well received by students and
practicing engineers who will be employing the students.
Since the contents of the course are the same as used to train
engineers and technicians in professional practice, the workperformed by the trainer (professional practitioner) is similar
in nature to that of an academician who is teaching this course
in an academic institution.
As the supervision of graduate students leads to
masters degree in an academic setting, training andmentoring of entry-level engineers leads to their professional
development and obtaining professional licenses in a non-
academic (professional practice) setting. To obtain a
professional license, it is required that engineers with MS and
-
7/29/2019 Relationship Between Professional Practice and Academia in Geotechnical Engineering
3/4
Session 7E6
International Conference on Engineering Education August 6 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway
7E6-3
BS degrees must work under the supervision of a registered
professional engineer (P.E.) for a minimum period of 3 and 4
years, respectively.
Lowman (1995) has significantly emphasized the
importance of teaching with classroom discussions compared
to pure lecturing styles. A closer look at this format reveals
that this format of exchanging information and learning is
exactly the same how projects are discussed and executed in
professional practice. On large and complex projects,
engineers and technicians (like undergraduate and graduate
students in academic setting) sit with the project managers and
senior engineers (similar to faculty members in an academicsetting) in brain storming sessions at the beginning of projects
to learn from each other and execute the projects successfully.
Several professional practitioners work on
developing textbooks and reference books, e.g., a well
recognized and accepted textbook titled Waste
Contamination Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills
was published by H. Sharma (Sharma, 1994) who is a
practicing engineer. The numbers of textbooks published by
professional practitioners is significantly less than thosepublished by academicians for the reasons beyond the scope
of discussion in this paper. However, academicians within
their first few years of academic career are rarely involved inpublishing textbooks. Very similar to academicians,
professional practitioners are involved in developing,
publishing, and reviewing the manuscripts for publication in
various journals and conferences.
Every civil engineering curriculum has a capstone
design course for students to complete in their senior year of
engineering education. The main objective of the capstone
design course is to provide understanding of the basic
concepts of planning, execution, and design of civil
engineering projects to undergraduate students planning topursue career in any area of Civil Engineering. In this course,
the students work in teams on actual real-world projects. The
main components of the course are to teach students the
important aspects of project development, and to train them
how to develop winning proposals and successfully complete
the design by working as a member of the team of project
design professionals. Since this course involves directly
working on real-world problems in a manner similar to the
professionals work in practice, the role played by the
instructor of the course is exactly the same as that of a
professional practitioner facilitating the design of projects in
practice.
RESEARCH/SCHOLARSHIP
Another important assignment of academicians is to conduct
research and scholarly activities to advance state-of-the-art,
knowledge, and practice. For an activity to qualify asresearch, it must be shown that the knowledge pursued or
gained is new. In academe, this judgment is usually
conducted by those who have demonstrated awareness and
understanding of the specialized body of knowledge to
which the research relates. This is usually accomplished by
peer review of proposals and research results (Aldridge,
1994). Faculty members at research institutes conduct
research and publish their work in journals and conference
proceedings for their work to be considered research.
Undergraduate and graduate students help the professors in
conducting the research.
In an academic setting, research conducted by the
academicians can be classified as fundamental or applied.
Results of the applied research have direct and immediate
application in the field. In professional practice, design of
several projects require significant review of availableliterature, development of model, unique laboratory and field
testing, design calculations and parametric study. Working
on projects of this nature are similar to working on applied
research projects in academic setting since the outcome of
work is a new and improved design and construction
techniques which adds to either state-of-the-art, or
knowledge, or practice depending on the project and
outcome from the research. Several unique field design and
construction methods in use today were born due theresearch conducted by professional practitioners during
execution of field projects. Before joining SIUC, the author
worked on several of these types of projects, one of whichreceived Engineering Excellence Award in the study and
research category of the awards established by Consulting
Engineers Council of Missouri (CeCMO). Results form that
study were published in one of the best journals on
earthquake engineering, and the paper received the best
technical paper published award from the college of
engineering at SIUC.
Similar to the peer review of results and reports of
research conducted by academicians, there are peer review
groups to review the innovative solutions to practicalproblems. A national organization, American Council of
Engineering Consultants have established awards for
innovative designs in the studies and research category in
which the projects are reviewed by a peer review group.
Because of the variability in soil and groundwater
conditions at every site, every project offers challenge for
the design. Therefore, every project site serves the purpose
of a laboratory for the geotechnical engineers in practice.
There are several research projects which require
academicians and professional practitioners to work
together. Professional practitioners working on these types
of projects get research experience similar to that of
academicians.Professional practitioners, like faculty members at
research universities, publish the data and knowledge gained
from various projects in peer reviewed journals and
conference proceedings. Most of the time, the peer review
group of the technical papers submitted by professionalpractitioners and academicians is the same suggesting that
the work performed by professional practitioners is reviewed
using the same standards as the work of academicians.
-
7/29/2019 Relationship Between Professional Practice and Academia in Geotechnical Engineering
4/4
Session 7E6
International Conference on Engineering Education August 6 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway
7E6-4
Identification of a research project is considered one of the
most important steps in pursuing a research project. First
few years of a faculty members academic career involves
identifying and pursuing new research projects. Professional
practice experience also helps in identifying new problems
which need further studies. Funded research projects, the
author is currently working at his academic position, are
based on the problems he identified during his professional
career and involve design and testing similar to what is done
in professional practice.
SERVICE
The third important component of academicians
responsibilities is service to their institution and profession.
In an academic setting, the service by a faculty member
includes but not limited to serving on departmental, college,
and university committees to smoothly and successfully
satisfy the clients needs . In addition, service in an academic
setting may include: serving on the committees of
professional societies; presenting seminars for public,engineers, and students; and taking active parts in
organization of conferences and seminars.
In professional practice, engineers take active partin the in-house committees, e.g., total quality management
committees, quality control and quality assurance
committee, and risk and liability assessment committees.
Professional practitioners take active part in presenting
seminars and serve on the regional and national professional
societies. Similar to academicians, professional practitioners
are involved in organizing conference and seminars.
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
The primary responsibility of both professionals,
professional practitioners and academicians, is to satisfy
their clients. The textbook definition of a client is the
individual or group whose needs you are responsible for
satisfying (Hyman, 1998). In professional practice, the client
is an individual customer or an organization who will use the
final design and/or be affected by the design. Whereas in an
academic setting, one of the most important group of clients
is students. As the clients need defines the purpose of
design in professional practice, students need defines the
purpose of direct or indirect instruction. During his academic
career at SIUC, authors students (his clients) havesignificantly valued his professional practice experience by
highly rating his teaching and submitting unsolicited
comments regarding the benefit they are receiving from the
authors professional practice experience. Therefore, if
experience of a person is useful to satisfy the needs of his orher clients, and if the clients recognize the value of a
particular type of experience, according to a basic principle
of marketing and Client retention, that experience is required
to successfully complete the clients' work.
Based on the similarity analysis between the duties
of professional practitioners and faculty members within
first few years of their academic career; both having the
same academic qualification, it is the authors opinion that
the professional practice experience obtained in an
appropriate setting is equivalent to the experience gained
within first few years in an academic setting, particularly
when our clients (our students) value that experience. The
appropriate setting for a professional practitioners is the
environment in which he/she could get the opportunity to
work on the tasks discussed here.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author wish to thank his students at SIUC, and his
protgs and mentors at various consulting firms for helping
him to understand faces of both the professions which
enabled him to prepare and present this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Aldridge, D.M. (1994), Professional Practice: A Topic for
Engineering Research and Instruction Journal of
Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 83, No.3.
Hyman, B. (1998), Fundamentals of Engineering Design,
Prentice Hall Publishers, NJ.
Lowman, J. (1995), Mastering the techniques of Teaching,
Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Milton, O. (1982), Will That be on Finals?, Springfield,
IL: Charles C. Thomas
Sharma, H. (1994), Waste Contamination Systems, Waste
Stabilization, and Landfills, John Wiley Publishers, NY
Woods, D.R. (1987), How Might I Teach Problem
Solving? New Directions of Teaching and Learning No. 30,
J.E. Stice Ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.