stevenhales.files.wordpress.comreincarnation redux was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject...

9

Upload: others

Post on 19-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 2: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 3: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 4: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 5: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 6: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 7: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 8: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science
Page 9: stevenhales.files.wordpress.comREINCARNATION REDUX was to be considered flawed or ultimately subject to deterministic explanation. This was not rigid dogmatism, it was good science