ref : 01formexa · ref : 01formexa *in capital letters: dgac/easa - 11.2019. 5 skill test and...
TRANSCRIPT
If a
pp
licab
le,
this
for
m i
s al
so t
he
cert
ific
ate
of
com
ple
tio
n o
f th
e ty
pe
rati
ng
cou
rse
for
ZFT
T.
Skill test ATPL(A)
MPL(A)
1 Theoretical training for the issue of a type rating performed during period (if relevant)
From: To: ATO:
Mark obtained % (Pass mark 75%): HT Type and number of licence:
Signature of HT: Name(s)*:
2 FSTD training (if relevant)
Three or more axes: No
Ready for service and used:FSTD (aircraft type):
FSTD manufacturer: Motion or system: Visual aid: Yes No
FSTD operator: FSTD ID code:
Instrument approaches at aerodromes to a decision altitude or height of: Total training time at the controls:
Location, date and time: Type and number of licence:
Type rating instructor Synthetic flight instructor
Signature of instructor: Name(s)*:
3 Flight training : in the aircraft in the FSTD (for ZFTT)
Type of aircraft: Registration: Flight time at the controls:
Training aerodromes or sites (take-offs, approaches and landings):
Take-offs: Landings:
Take-off time: Landing time:
Location and date:
Type and number of licence held: Type rating instructor
Signature of instructor:
Yes
4 ATO informations
Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
IR Licence Skill test
Revalidation
Renewal
Type of test: Type Rating:
Revalidation
Renewal
Ski
llte
st
Pro
fici
ency
ch
eck:
TRAINING AND REPORT FORM
ATPL, MPL, SKILL TEST AND PROFICIENCY CHECK AEROPLANES (A)
Date of birth:
Type of licence held:
Licence number:
State of licence issue:Ap
plic
ant Last name(s)*:
First name(s)*:
(if relevant)
CAT-II/III
Name(s)*:
TO B
E FI
LLED
BY
TH
E A
TO T
RA
ININ
G S
TAFF
Only in case of initial rating or renewal of expired rating:
The ATO confirms that the candidate has been trained according to the approved syllabus and assures the level of proficiency required.
ATO name: Registration number:
Name of head of training*: Licence number:
Location & date:
Signature of head of training & ATO stamp:
EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 1501/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
*In capital letters:
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019
5 Skill test and proficiency check details:
Aerodrome or site:
Total flighttime:
Take-off time:
Landing time:
Pass Partial Pass**
Date of exam first attempt:
SIM or aircraft registration:
Examiner’s certificate number:
Fail**
I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL.
I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theorecal knowledge examination when applicable.
02/09
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9
Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 15
Revalidation of TR only: 10 route sectors Or 1 route sector with an examiner Or combined LPC/OPC acc. to FCL 740.A (a)(3)
I confirm that in the event of a partial pass or fail I mustnot exercise the privileges of the rating until a full pass has been obtained.
Applicant name(s)* and signature:
*In capital letters
In case of Partial Pass or Fail
6 Remarks
Pass Fail**ATPL(A)MPL(A)
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
Date of exam second attempt:
ATPL(A)MPL(A)
IR
CAT-II/III Pass Fail**
TR
CAT-II/III
IRTR
Partial Pass**
Examiner’s certificate number:
Type and licence number :
Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:
I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL.
I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theorecalknowledge examination when applicable.
Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:
Total flight time:
Pass Fail**
Pass Fail**
Pass Fail**
**Give reasons and detail any further training:
Aerodrome or site:
SIM or aircraft registration:
Type and licence number :
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
European IR/PBN Pass Fail** European IR/PBN Pass Fail**
I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 3 and 4 of this form.
Validation of European IR/PBN
I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 3 and 4 of this form.
Validation of European IR/PBN
EnglishLanguage in which the test has been conducted French
NON-FRENCH EXAMINER ONLY I hereby declare that I have reviewed and applied the relevant national procedures and requirements of the applicant’s competent authority contained in the latest version of the Examiner Differences Document.
Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 15
EASA-FCL Appendix 903/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
VALIDATION OF EUROPEAN IR/PBN
(modified) INSTRUCTION TO EXAMINERSValid from 25/08/2018 until 25/08/2020
Introduction Following the enforcement of EU 2016/539 regulation (training checking of pilots for PBN operations), the purpose of this note is to provide examiners (especially “non-French examiners”) with proper instruction to conduct the assessment of pilots holding an EASA licence administrated by France for transition to European IR/PBN.
It is reminded that since 25/08/2018, European IR/PBN is mandatory (and must be recorded in pilots documents) to operate in PBN classified airspaces or to conduct PBN approaches.
The procedure described thereafter will enable examiners to deliver the European IR/PBN :
• to pilots having attended an EASA approved PBN course in an ATO (according regulation EU2016/539 article 1 (1)(2)) , or
• to pilots having followed an equivalent training provided by an European Airline accordingregulation EU 2016/539 article 1 (1)(3) (designated thereafter as “grandfatheringprocedure”).
“Grandfathering procedure”
Until 25/08/2020, French licence holders are eligible for validation of European IR/PBN during their LPC, provided they :
1. can justify to their examiner having completed a PBN course (equivalent to the coursedescribed in regulation EU 2016/539 article 1 (1)(2)) by providing a certificate delivered byan European AOC operator,
2. answer to a satisfactory level an oral questionnaire covering main PBN topics during thebriefing prior to the LPC session (see guidance further in this note),
3. are assessed as competent when performing at least one 2D or one 3D approach based onGNSS during the flight/FSTD session of the LPC.
All 3 items above must be covered
Note 1: the certificate stated in (1) has no formal defined format. It must clearly state that the applicant has been trained (theoretical course + in-flight/FSTD training) in all PBN concepts, especially RNP GNSS approaches. Once checked, the certificate is to stay with the holder.
Preparation of the applicant for the oral questionnaire
It is highly advisable that applicants self-prepare themselves for the oral examination. For this purpose, they can study any updated and detailed document on the subject (the list of training objectives is detailed in AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS”). Normally, knowledge and guidance included in the Operator Manual should be sufficient. Note that DGAC provides a comprehensive PBN guide (in French language) downloadable on DGAC website.
Procedure for the validation of European IR/PBN for pilots not eligible for the “grandfathering procedure”
These pilots must attend an approved PBN course in an EASA approved ATO (ground + flight/FSTD training + checking).
Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 15
EASA-FCL Appendix 904/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
Paperwork to be completed by examiner for the validation of European IR/PBN
After having conducted the evaluation as described above, the examiner shall either:
• Tick the corresponding boxes on the paper Training and Report Form for LPC, or
• For examiner having access to the internet system SIGEBEL, tick thecorresponding box on the test record page.
Note: it is mandatory to use the latest version of the French TRF (Training and Report Form) including the corresponding tick-boxes. It is downloadable on DGAC website.
Reminder: only examiners administrated by France are entitled to write on the licence of the holder of an EASA licence administrated by France (under conditions). Non-French examiners must only fill-in the TRF. The LPC and the PBN mention will be entered in the licence by a French licence officer.
The box « European IR/PBN » / PASS/FAIL must be ticked for the first validation of European PBN and on each revalidation.
The box « Validation of European IR/PBN » must be ticked for the first validation only.
Examiners entitled to conduct IR/PBN evaluation
Revalidation of IR/PBN Once validated, IR/PBN must be revalidated at each LPC by the successful completion of either one 2D or one 3D approach based on GNSS. On the TRF, the box « European IR/PBN » / PASS/FAIL must be ticked for each revalidation.
Additional information to examiner concerning the oral questionnaire Examiners are requested to ask about 8 questions. Pass rate is 75% (6 good answers)
Questions must cover both theoretical aspects of RNAV/PBN (principles, parameters like accuracy, integrity, continuity, functionality, navigation specifications, designation of specifications especially the ones commonly used by the candidate in operations) and practical aspects (use of PBN, SOPs, MEL practice, associated NOTAMs, RNP APP technique, etc.). When preparing their questions, examiners can use the operator OM and/or official documents like AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS” and ICAO doc 9613. French readers can usefully refer to the comprehensive document mentioned earlier in this note.
Only EASA certified examiner holding an European IR/PBN are entitled to conduct the evaluation for validation of European IR/PBN.
6. Multi-pilot aeroplanes and single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes:
(a) The following symbols mean:
P = Trained as PIC or Co-pilot and as PF and PNF for the issue of a type rating as applicable.
X = Simulators shall be used for this exercise, if available; otherwise an aircraft shall be used if appropriate for the manoeuvre or procedure.
P# = The training shall be complemented by supervised aeroplane inspection.
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9
Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 15
05/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
(b) The practical training shall be conducted at least at the training equipment level shown as (P), or may be
conducted up to any higher equipment level shown by the arrow (——— >).
The following abbreviations are used to indicate the training equipment used:
A = Aeroplane
FFS = Full Flight Simulator
FTD = Flight Training Device
OTD = Other Training Devices
(c) The starred items (*) shall be flown solely by reference to instruments. If this condition is not met during the skill test or proficiency check, the type rating will be restricted to VFR only.
(d) Where the letter ‘M’ appears in the skill test or proficiency check column this will indicate the mandatory exerciseor a choice where more than one exercice appears.
(e) An FFS shall be used for practical training and testing if the FFS forms part of an approved type rating course. The following considerations will apply to the approval of the course:
(i) the qualification of the FFS or FNPT II;
(ii) the qualifications of the instructors;
(iii) the amount of FFS or FNPT II training provided on the course; and
(iv) the qualifications and previous experience on similar types of the pilot under training.
(f) Manoeuvres and procedures shall include MCC for multi-pilot aeroplane (...)
(g) Not applicable
(h) Not applicable
(i) In case of a restricted type rating issued in accordance with FCL.720.A(e), the applicants shall fulfil the same requirements as other applicants for the type rating except for the practical exercises relating to the take-off and landing phases.
(j) To establish or maintain PBN privileges one approach shall be an RNP APCH. Where an RNP APCH is not practicable, it shall be performed in an appropriately equipped FSTD.
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 1506/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
PRACTICAL TRAINING ATPL/MPL/TYPE RATING SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK
Manoeuvres/Procedures Instructor initials when training
completed
Checked inFSTD A/CFSTD
1.1 Performance calculation
1.2 Aeroplane external visual inspection; location of each item and purpose of inspection
1.3 Cockpit inspection
1.5 Taxiing in compliance with air traffic control or instructions of instructor
1.6 Before take-off checks
2 attempt
FailPass
1 attempt
FailPassA
2.1 Normal take-offs with different flap settings, included expedited take-offs
2.2* Instrument take-off; transition to instrument flight is required during rotation or immediately after becoming airborne
2.3 Crosswind take-o�
1. Flight preparation
SECTION 1 Insert examiner’s initials only
2. Take-o�s
SECTION 2
2.4 Take-off at maximum take-off mass (actual or simulated maximum take-off mass)
2.5 Take-offs with simulated engine failure2.5.1* Shortly after reaching V2
2.5.2* Between V1 and V2
(in aeroplanes which are not certificated as transport category or commuter category aeroplanes, the engine failure shall not be simulated until reaching a minimum height of 500 ft above runway end. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-off mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure shortly after reaching V2)
2.6 Rejected take-o� at a reasonable speed before reaching V1
3. Flight manoeuvres and procedures
SECTION 3
3.1 Manual flight with and without flight directors (no autopilot, no autothrust/autothrottle, and at different control laws, where applicable)
M
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
1.4 Use of checklist prior to starting engines, starting procedures, radio and navigation equipment check, selection and settings of navigation and communication frequencies
P
3.1.1 At different speeds (including slow flight) and altitudes within the FSTD training envelope
3.1.2 Steep turns using 45° bank, 180° to 360° left and right
3.1.3 Turns with and without spoilers
3.1.4 Procedural instrument flying and manoeuvring including instrument departure and arrival, and visual approach
3.2 Tuck under and Mach buffets (if applicable), and other specific flight characteristics of the aeroplane (e.g. Dutch Roll)
3.3 Normal operation of systems and controls engineer's panel (if applicable)
Skill test only
MULTI-PILOT AEROPLANES AND SINGLE-PILOT HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPLEX AEROPLANES
OTD
OTD P# P
P
P
P
P M
P
P
P
P
P
P X M FFS only
MP
P
P
P
P
P
P XAn aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
FFS only
OTD
P
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 1507/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
PRACTICAL TRAINING ATPL/MPL/TYPE RATING SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK
Manoeuvres/Procedures Instructor initialswhen training
completed
Checked inFSTD A/C
FSTD
2 attempt
FailPass
1 attempt
FailPassA
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
3.4 Normal and abnormal operations of following systems
A mandatory minimum of 3 abnormal itemsshall be selected from 3.4.0 to 3.4.14 inclusive
M
3.4.0 Engine (if necessary propeller)
3.4.1 Pressurisation and air-conditioning
3.4.2 Pilot/static system
3.4.3 Fuel system
3.4.4 Electrical system
3.4.5 Hydraulic system
3.4.6 Flight control and Trim-system
3.4.7 Anti-icing/de-icing system, Glare shield heating
3.4.8 Autopilot/Flight director
3.4.9 Stall warning devices or stall avoidance devices, and stability augmentation devices
3.4.10 Ground proximity warning system, weather radar, radio altimeter, transponder
3.4.11 Radios, navigation equipment, instruments, flight management system
3.4.12 Landing gear and brake
3.4.13 Slat and flap system
3.4.14 Auxiliary power unit (APU)
3.6 Abnormal and emergency procedures A mandatory minimum of 3 items shall be selected from 3.6.1 to 3.6.9 inclusive
M
3.6.1 Fire drills e.g. engine, APU, cabin, cargo compartment, flight deck, wing and electrical fires including evacuation
3.6.2 Smoke control and removal
3.6.3 Engine failures, shut-down and restart at a safe height
3.6.4 Fuel dumping (simulated)
3.6.5 Windshear at take-off/landing
3.6.6 Simulated cabin pressure failure/emergency descent
3.6.7 Incapacitation of flight crew member
3.6.8 Other emergency procedures as outlined in the appropriate Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM)
3.6.9 TCAS event
3.7.1 Recovery from stall events in :– take-off configuration ;– clean configuration at low altitude ;– clean configuration near maximum operating altitude ; – landing configuration.
3.7.2 The following upset exercises : – recovery from nose-high at various bank
angles; – recovery from nose-low at various bank
angles.
MULTI-PILOT AEROPLANES AND SINGLE-PILOT HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPLEX AEROPLANES
OTDP
OTDP
OTDP
OTDP
OTDP
OTDP
OTDP
OTD
POTD
P M (single pilot only)
OTDP
P
OTD
POTD
POTDOTD
P
P
P
P
P
P X FFS only
P
P
P
OTDP FFS only
An aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
An aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
P X
FFS qualified for the training task only
FFS onlyAn aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
P X
FFS qualified for the training task only
3.7 Upset recovery training
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 1508/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
PRACTICAL TRAININGATPL/MPL/TYPE RATING
SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK
Manoeuvres/Procedures Instructor initialswhen training
completed
Checked inFSTD A/CFSTD
2 attempt
FailPass
1 attempt
FailPassA
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
3.8.1* Adherence to departure and arrival routes and ATC instructions
3.8.2* Holding procedures
3.8.3.1* Manually, without flight director
3.8.3.3* With autopilot
3.8.3* 3D operations to DH/A of 200 feet (60 m) or to higher minima if required by the approach procedure
3.8.3.2* Manually, with flight director
3.8.4* 2D operations down to the MDH/A
3.8.5 Circling approach under the following conditions :
Remark: If (a) and (b) are not possible due to ATC reasons, a simulated low visibility pattern may be performed.
3.8.3.4* Manually, with one engine simulated inoperative during final approach, either until touchdown or through the complete missed approach procedure (as applicable), starting : i) before passing 1 000ft above aerodrome level;
and
ii) after passing the outer marker (OM) within a distance of not more than 4NM
3.8 Instrument flight procedures
Note: According to the AFM, RNP APCH procedures may require the use of autopilot or Flight director. The procedure to be �own manually shall be chosen takinginto account such limitations (for example, choose an ILS for 3.8.3.1 in case of such AFM limitation).
In aeroplanes which are not certificated as transport category aeroplanes (JAR/FAR 25) or as commuter category aeroplanes (SFAR 23), the approach with simulated engine failure and the ensuing go-around shall be initiated in conjunction with the non-precision approach as described in 3.8.4. The go-around shall be initiated when reaching the published OCH/A; however, not later than reaching an MDH/A of 500 ft above the runway threshold elevation. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-off mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure in accordance with 3.8.3.4.
(a)*approach to the authorised minimum circling approach altitude at the aerodrome in question in accordance with the local instrument approach facilities in simulated instrument flight conditions ; followed by : (b) circling approach to another runway at least 90° off centreline from the final approach used in item (a), at the authorised minimum circling approach atitude
3.8.6 Visual approaches
4. Missed Approach Procedures
SECTION 4
4.1 Go-around with all engines operating* during a 3D operation on reaching decision height
4.2 Go-around with all engines operative* from various stages during an instrument approach
4.3 Other missed approach procedures
4.4* Manual go-around with the critical engines simulated inoperative after an instrument approach on reaching DH, MDH or MAPT
4.5 Rejected landing with all engines operating :
– from various heights below DH/MDH ; – after touchdown (baulked landing)
In aeroplanes which are not certificated as transport category aeroplanes (JAR/FAR 25) or as commuter category aeroplanes (SFAR 23), the rejected landing with all engines operating shall be initiated below MDH/A or after touchdown.
MULTI-PILOT AEROPLANES AND SINGLE-PILOT HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPLEX AEROPLANES
MP
P
P M(skill test only)
P
P
M
P
MP*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P* M
P
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019
Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens
DGAC/EASA - 11.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman
75720 PARIS CEDEX 1509/09
Ref
: 01
Form
exa
PRACTICAL TRAINING ATPL/MPL/TYPE RATING SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK
Manoeuvres/Procedures Instructor initialswhen training
completed
Checked inFSTD A/C
FSTD
2 attempt
FailPass
1 attempt
FailPassA
TRA
ININ
G A
ND
REP
OR
T FO
RM
ATP
L, M
PL,
SK
ILL
TES
T A
ND
PR
OFI
CIE
NC
Y C
HEC
K A
ERO
PLA
NES
5. Landings
SECTION 5
5.1 Normal landings* with visual reference established when reaching DA/H following an instrument approach operation
5.2 Landing with simulated jammed horizontal stabiliser in any out-of-trim position
5.3 Crosswind landings (aircraft, if practicable)
5.4 Traffic pattern and landing without extended or with partly extended flaps and slats
5.6 Landing with two engines inoperative :– aeroplanes with three engines : the centre engine and one outboard engine as far as practicable according to data of the AFM ; and – aeroplanes with four engines : two engines at one side
5.5 Landing with critical engine simulated inoperative
6.1* Rejected take-off at minimum authorised runway visual range (RVR)
General remarks : Special requirements for the extension of a type rating for instrument approaches down to a decision height of less than 200 ft (60 m), i.e. CAT II/III operations.
SECTION 6
Additional authorisation on a type rating for instrument approaches down to a DH of less than 60 m (200 ft) (CAT II/III) The following manoeuvres and procedures are the minimum training requirements to permit instrument approaches down to
a DH of less than 60 m (200 ft). During the following instrument approaches and missed approach procedures, all aeroplane equipment required for type certification of instrument approaches down to a DH of less than 60 m (200 ft) shall be used.
6.2* CAT II/III approaches: in simulated instrument flight conditions down to the applicable DH, using flight guidance system. Standard procedures of crew coordination (task sharing, call-out procedures, mutual surveillance, information exchange and support) shall be observed.
6.3* Go-around : after approaches as indicated in 6.2 on reaching DH.
6.4* Landing(s) : with visual reference established at DH following an instrument approach. Depending on the specific flight guidance system, an automatic landing shall be performed.
The training shall also include a go-around due to (simulated) insufficient RVR, wind shear, aeroplane deviation in excess of approach limits for a successful approach, ground/airborne equipment failure prior to reaching DH, and go- around with simulated airborne equipment failure.
ATPL ONLYADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE ASSESSED FOR ATPL EXAM
Management of crew cooperation
Maintaining a general survey of the aircraft
Setting priorities and making decisions in accordance withsafety aspects and relevant rules and regulations appropriate to the operational situation, including emergencies
M
M
M
ATPL SKILL TEST ONLY
PASS FAIL
Note : CAT II/III operations shall be accomplished in accordance with the applicable air operations requirements.
MULTI-PILOT AEROPLANES AND SINGLE-PILOT HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPLEX AEROPLANES
P
P FFS onlyAn aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
P
P
P M
FFS only(skill test only)
P
M
X
An aeroplane shall not be used for this exercice
P* XM*
P M
P M*
P M