1 procedure design criteria presented by eliane belin dgac - enac [email protected]

79
1 PROCEDURE DESIGN PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@ena c.fr

Upload: cristobal-crego

Post on 14-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

1

PROCEDURE DESIGN PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIACRITERIA

Presented by

Eliane Belin

DGAC - ENAC

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

2

TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS

Positioning method Accuracy

Waypoint tolerance Nominal trajectory

Stabilization distance Path terminator

Strategy Protection area Check list

Page 3: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

3

INS / IRS

GNSS

VORDME

DME DME

RNAV SYSTEMRNAV SYSTEM

A/C POSITIONA/C POSITION

Page 4: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

DEFINITION OF RNAV VORDMEDEFINITION OF RNAV VORDMEDEFINITION OF RNAV VORDMEDEFINITION OF RNAV VORDME

Reference facility

VOR/DME

Nominal Track

WAY-POINT

D : Distance from reference facility to the waypoint

D D1

D1 : Distance from reference facility to the tangent point

D2

D2 : Distance from the tangent point to the waypoint

Page 5: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

5

DME/DME POSITIONINGDME/DME POSITIONINGDME/DME POSITIONINGDME/DME POSITIONING

d1

DME3

DME1

DME4

DME2

Page 6: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

Area of simultaneous use of Area of simultaneous use of two DME stations two DME stations

Area of simultaneous use of Area of simultaneous use of two DME stations two DME stations

30°

60°D

D

Update area for DME stations located at distance “D” apartDME 1

DME 2

1NM

Page 7: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

7

SVi : xi, yi, zi RRii

SVj : xj, yj, zj

RRjj

SVk : xk, yk, zk

RR kk

2 points given by the intersection of the three LOPs

GPS receiver location

Page 8: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

8

TABLETABLE OF CONTENTSOF CONTENTSTABLETABLE OF CONTENTSOF CONTENTS

Positioning method Accuracy

Waypoint tolerance Nominal trajectory

Stabilization distance Path terminator

Strategy Protection area Check list

Page 9: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

9

DIFFERENT CRITERIADIFFERENT CRITERIADIFFERENT CRITERIADIFFERENT CRITERIA

ICA

OD

OC

8168

RNAV VOR-DME RNAV DME-DME

RNAV GNSS

Guidance material

DME DME / GNSS

Page 10: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

10

Estimated Flight Path

SYSTEM ACCURACYSYSTEM ACCURACYSYSTEM ACCURACYSYSTEM ACCURACY

Nominal Flight Path

HORIZONTAL VIEW

Estimated Position

FTT

ATT XTT

XTT depends on FTT

Nominal Aircraft Position

True Aircraft Flight Path

True Aircraft Position

Page 11: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

11

ATT

XTT

WAYPOINT TOLERANCEWAYPOINT TOLERANCEWAYPOINT TOLERANCEWAYPOINT TOLERANCE

Page 12: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

Based on 2 (95%)

confidence limits

SYSTEM ACCURACY: SYSTEM ACCURACY: VOR/DME AND DME-DMEVOR/DME AND DME-DME

SYSTEM ACCURACY: SYSTEM ACCURACY: VOR/DME AND DME-DMEVOR/DME AND DME-DME

FTT : Flight Technical Tolerance

Ei : Stations Tolerance

ST : System

computation

Page 13: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

Nominal Track

Reference facility

VOR/DME

D D1

D2

VORDME : ATT CalculationVORDME : ATT CalculationVORDME : ATT CalculationVORDME : ATT Calculation

ADT : Along DME Tolerance

ADT

AVT : Along VOR ToleranceST : System computationTolerance

AVT

STADTAVTATT 222

Page 14: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

D2

Nominal Track

VOR/DME

Reference facility

D D1

VT

VT : VOR Tolerance

DT

DT : DME ToleranceFTT : Flight Technical ToleranceST : Sytem computation Tolerance

STFTTDTVTXTT 2 222

VORDME : XTT CalculationVORDME : XTT CalculationVORDME : XTT CalculationVORDME : XTT Calculation

Page 15: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

DME-DME : ATT and XTTDME-DME : ATT and XTTDME-DME : ATT and XTTDME-DME : ATT and XTT

No reference to a DME/DME

couple No reference to a DME/DME

couple

Distance for calculation

=Radio Horizon

D=1.23 x (ft)

Distance for calculation

=Radio Horizon

D=1.23 x (ft)HH

d = 0.25NM + 0.0125 xDd = 0.25NM + 0.0125 xD

Altitude = previous segment

minimum altitudeAltitude = previous segment

minimum altitude

Only 2 DMEs available: multiply by 1.29!

Page 16: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

16

SUMMING UPSUMMING UP SUMMING UPSUMMING UP

System accuracy: VOR / DME

System accuracy: VOR / DME

ATT =XTT =ATT =XTT = STFTTDTVT

2222 STFTTDTVT2222

STADTAVT222 STADTAVT222

System accuracy: DME / DME

System accuracy: DME / DME

ATT =XTT =ATT =XTT = STFTTd

222 STFTTd222

STd22 STd22

Page 17: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

17

VOR/DME DME/DME

FTT( Nm) Initial 1 1

Intermediate 1 1

Final 0.5 0.5

API 0.5 0.5

ST (Nm) 0.5 0.25

VORDME- DMEDME:VORDME- DMEDME:FTT and STFTT and ST

VORDME- DMEDME:VORDME- DMEDME:FTT and STFTT and ST

Page 18: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

XTT calculation XTT calculation

VORDME - DME/DME VORDME - DME/DME PROTECTION AREA WIDTHPROTECTION AREA WIDTH

VORDME - DME/DME VORDME - DME/DME PROTECTION AREA WIDTHPROTECTION AREA WIDTH

Initial Intermediate1/2 AW = MAX( 2NM, 1.5 XTT + BV)

BV : 1NM

Initial Intermediate1/2 AW = MAX( 2NM, 1.5 XTT + BV)

BV : 1NM

Final, Mapt and TP1/2 AW = MAX( 1NM, 1.5 XTT + BV)

BV : 0.5NM

Final, Mapt and TP1/2 AW = MAX( 1NM, 1.5 XTT + BV)

BV : 0.5NM

Page 19: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

19

DESIGN OF PROTECTION DESIGN OF PROTECTION AREAS AREAS

DESIGN OF PROTECTION DESIGN OF PROTECTION AREAS AREAS

PRIMARY AREA

SECONDARY AREA

IAWP IWP

Page 20: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

20

GNSS TOLERANCEGNSS TOLERANCEGNSS TOLERANCEGNSS TOLERANCE

Space segment toleranceSpace segment tolerance

Receiver toleranceReceiver tolerance

System computer tolerance : ST

System computer tolerance : ST

Flight technical tolerance :FTT

Flight technical tolerance :FTT

Page 21: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

21

Number of satellites in view

Number of satellites in view

GEOMETRYGEOMETRY

Satellite Outage

Satellite Outage

DILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISION

PRECISIONPRECISION

Page 22: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

22

INTEGRITYINTEGRITYINTEGRITYINTEGRITY

Accuracy of the position

Integrity

Use of GNSS Position

GNSS Position not to be used

IMAL Value

IMAL : Integrity monitoring alarm limit The value depends on the phase of flight

Page 23: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

23

LFPO. PARIS ORLY

Baro Aided Outages24 May 2002 - 03:36:34 until 24 May 2002 - 03:41:34 UTC (00:05:00) DP: 4.949

Non-Baro Aided Outages24 May 2002 - 03:36:34 until 24 May 2002 - 03:44:34 UTC (00:08:00) DP: 5.442

http://augur.ecacnav.com

RAIMRAIMPredictionPrediction

WithWithAUGURAUGUR

Page 24: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

24

approach

airport A airport B

descentholding

climbing

initial

taxiing

taking offlanding

GNSS MODEGNSS MODEGNSS MODEGNSS MODE

30 Nm30 Nm

ROUTE TerminalTerminal Approach

en route

IMAL is coupled with GNSS mode

Page 25: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

GNSS : XTT - ATT GNSS : XTT - ATT GNSS : XTT - ATT GNSS : XTT - ATT

GPS MODE ROUTE TERMINAL APPROACH

Waypoint IAWP IAWP

Initialfix

IWP FAWP MAWP MAHWP

IMAL 2 Nm3.7 Km

1 Nm - 1.9 Km 0.3Nm

- 0.6Km

1Nm1.9 Km

FTT 2 Nm3.7Km

0.5 Nm - 0.9 Km 0.3 Nm0.6 Km

0.2 Nm0.4 Km

0.5 Nm0.9 Km

ATT=IMAL

2 Nm3.7 Km

1 Nm - 1.9 Km 0.3 Nm - 0.6 Km 1 Nm1.9 Km

XTT=IMAL+FTT

4 Nm7.4 Km

1.5 Nm - 2.8 Km 0.6 Nm1.1 Km

0.5 Nm0.9 Km

1.5 Nm2.8 Km

Half widtharea =2XTT

8 Nm14.8 Km

5 Nm - 9.3 Km 2 Nm3.7 Km

1 Nm1.9 Km

5 Nm9.3 Km

24

Page 26: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

26

KEY POINT 1KEY POINT 1KEY POINT 1KEY POINT 1

Sensor ATT and XTT

Protection area WidthPLAN FOR ALL SENSORS PLAN FOR ALL SENSORS

Page 27: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

27

TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS

Positioning method Accuracy

Waypoint tolerance Nominal trajectory

stabilization distance Path terminator

Strategy Protection area Check list

Page 28: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

28

On board data base

•Aerodrome data Airspace limits Available navaids

Flight paths to follow (charts)

ALL RNAV TRAJECTORIES ARE CODED INTO THE DATA BASE

Page 29: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

29

Planned flight Path

Start of descent

Interception

Next WP

Page 30: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

30

GPS PRIMARY

CLB FLT4567890 CRZ OPT REC MAXFL350 FL370 FL390

<REPORT UPDATE AT*[ ] BRG /DIST ---° /----.- TO [ ] PREDICTIVE<GPS GPS PRIMARYREQUIRED ACCUR ESTIMATED 2.1NM HIGH 0.16NMGPS PRIMARYSensor

FB TURN

Navigation Performance

Page 31: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

31

CODINGCODING

PATHPATH

CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS

CODINGCODINGCODINGCODING

How to navigate

PATH TERMINATOR

How to navigate

PATH TERMINATOR

CF : Course to fix

DF : Direct to fix

Page 32: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

32

Path Terminator conceptPath Terminator concept

Transforms procedures into coded flight paths

Set of two letters

PT instructs to navigate from a starting point to a specific point or terminating condition

Page 33: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

33

TF : Track between FixesTF : Track between FixesTF : Track between FixesTF : Track between Fixes

Page 34: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

34

DF : Direct to FixDF : Direct to FixDF : Direct to FixDF : Direct to Fix

Page 35: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

35

CF : Course to FixCF : Course to FixCF : Course to FixCF : Course to Fix

135°

Page 36: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

36

IF Initial Fix

TF Track between fix

RF Radius to fix

DF Direct to fix

FA Fix to an altitude

CF Course to fix

HF Hold to fix

HA Hold to altitude

HM Hold for clearance

PI Procedure turn tointrecept

CA Course to altitude

CI Course to intercept

CD Course to dme arc

CR Course to VOR radial

FC Course from fix

FD Fix to DME arc

FM Vectors from fix

AF DME Arc to fix

VD Heading to DME Arc

VA Heading to altitude (climb)

VM Heading (vectors)

VI Heading to intercept

VR Heading to VOR Radial

ARINC 424 PATH

TERMINATOR

ARINC 424 PATH

TERMINATOR

Page 37: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

37

DF

PATH TERMINATORPATH TERMINATORPATH TERMINATORPATH TERMINATOR

TF TF

CF

DF

CF

TF

CF

DF

TF

CFCF

TF

DF TF : Track between fixes

CF : course to fix

DF : Direct to fix

Page 38: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

38

KEY POINT 2KEY POINT 2KEY POINT 2KEY POINT 2

Type of waypoint Type of waypoint

PATH TerminatorPATH Terminator

Be aware of coding influenceBe aware of coding influence

Real need of COMMUNICATION

with coding suppliers

Real need of COMMUNICATION

with coding suppliers

Nominal trajectoryProtection area

Nominal trajectoryProtection area

Page 39: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

39

TYPE OF WAYPOINTSTYPE OF WAYPOINTS

IAWP

IWP

FAWP

MAWP

MAHWP

HWP

AWP

DWP

Page 40: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

40

TURN INITIATION DISTANCETURN INITIATION DISTANCETURN INITIATION DISTANCETURN INITIATION DISTANCE

2

R

R

L1 = R.tan (

L2 =

/ 2 )

5 . TAS / 3600

L=L1+L2

L1 L2

L

Page 41: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

41

TAS

Turn angle

FLY-BY BANK : 25°

Page 42: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

42

TURN STABILIZATION DISTANCETURN STABILIZATION DISTANCETURN STABILIZATION DISTANCETURN STABILIZATION DISTANCE

60°

30°R1

30°

30°

R2

L1= r1.sin

L2= r1.cos .tg30°L3 = r1 (1/sin30° - 2cos / sin60° )

L4 = r2 . tan15°L5 = 10 . TAS / 3600L = L1 + L2 + L3 + L4 + L5

L1 L2 L4L3 L5

L

Page 43: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

43

TAS

Turn angle

FLY-OVER BANK : 15°

Page 44: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

44

WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BY

Page 45: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

45

WP1 : FLY-BY WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-BY WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-BY WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-BY WP2 : FLY-BY

Page 46: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

46

WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-OVEROVER

WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-OVEROVER

Page 47: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

47

TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS

Positioning method Accuracy

Waypoint tolerance Nominal trajectory

stabilization distance Path terminator

Strategy Protection area Check list

Page 48: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

48

STRATEGYSTRATEGYSTRATEGYSTRATEGY Séparation SID/ STAR Attente / IAF décalé des axes de pistes

Concept Y ou T Mise en place de WP supplémentaires

pour correspondre au séquencement Prise en compte des zone urbanisée Utilisation de la descente continue

(CDA)

FLOATING WP

abatement

PROCEDURE

Page 49: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

49

Holding shift from RWY axis

WPs floatingSegregation traffic

Distance for sequencing

Page 50: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

50

STOCHOLM ARLANDA

Page 51: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

51

NON RNAV

Page 52: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

52

RNAV

Page 53: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

53

Project CDA-evaluation with KLM FMS data

Aircraft: B747-400

Procedure: 2000 ft approachRunway: 06

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 54: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

54

CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS DESCENTDESCENT APPROACHAPPROACH

OM

SUGOL

RIVER

AMEGA

fromARTIP

21.0 DME PAM

14.0 DME SPL

16.5 DME RTM

CH

FAP

NORBI

DETSI

27.0 to THR

27.0 to THR

27.0 to THR

220 MAX, 2

00 M IN

KTS

220 MAX,

200 M IN

KTS

220 MA

X, 200 M

IN K

TS

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 55: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

55

Footprint B747-400, Conventional 2000 ft approach

-10

-5

0

5

10

-45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Y (

km

)

X (km)

55.0 dB(A); 215.266 km²

65.0 dB(A); 65.423 km²75.0 dB(A); 11.781 km²

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 56: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

56

Footprint B747-400, Conventional 3000 ft approach

-10

-5

0

5

10

-45 -40 -35 - -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 5

-

0 5

Y (

km

)

X (km)

55.0 dB(A); 234.266 km²

65.0 dB(A); 74.945 km²75.0 dB(A); 11.689 km²

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 57: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

57

Footprint B747-400, Continuous Descent Approach

-10

-5

0

5

10

-45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Y (

km

)

X (km)

55.0 dB(A); 191.306 km²

65.0 dB(A); 40.414 km²75.0 dB(A); 11.484 km²

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 58: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

58

FUEL CONSUMPTION PER FLIGHT PHASEB747-400

Flight phaseFuel consumption

(kg/km)

Cruise ~10

2000 ft /3000 ft approach ~30 (at horizontal segment)

CDA ~ 6 (before ILS glide slope)

FUEL CONSUMPTION PER FLIGHT PHASEB737-300/400

Flight phase Fuel consumption (kg/km)

Cruise ~2.5

2000 ft /3000 ft approach ~7 (at horizontal segment)

CDA ~2.5 (before ILS glide slope

Nationaal Lucht- en RuimtevaartlaboratoriumNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR

Page 59: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

59

KEY POINT 3KEY POINT 3KEY POINT 3KEY POINT 3

Safety issuesSafety issues

•Minimum distance•Coding requirements

•Minimum distance•Coding requirements

Operational issuesOperational issues

•Pilots needs•ATC needs•Environmental aspect

•Pilots needs•ATC needs•Environmental aspect

Page 60: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

60

TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS

Positioning method Accuracy

Waypoint tolerance Nominal trajectory

stabilization distance Path terminator

Strategy Protection area Check list

Page 61: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

61

PROTECTION AREAPROTECTION AREAPROTECTION AREAPROTECTION AREA

Use of wind spiral for all turn protections

Max turn angle :120° (no reversal)

No bank angle delay for a fly-by WP

Protection deal with max TAS and low TAS

WHAT’S NEW ?

Bank angle : 25° / 15°Pilot reaction delay : 6 sec / 3 SecDescend and climb gradient MOC

WHAT’ S REMAINING ?

Page 62: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

62

ATT

c

30°

TURN AT FLY-OVER WPTURN AT FLY-OVER WPTURN AT FLY-OVER WPTURN AT FLY-OVER WP

Page 63: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

63

ATT

ATT

R.TAN(A/2)

R’ R ’’

cS’ S’’

30°

A/2

FLY-BY WP turn angle FLY-BY WP turn angle 90° 90°FLY-BY WP turn angle FLY-BY WP turn angle 90° 90°

A

R

Page 64: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

FLY-BY turn angle >

90 °r

r.tan(A/2)

R’ R’’

cS’ S’’

ID = r . TAN (A / 2)

C = Center circle

r = Radius of turn

A/2

r

rD

C

AIATT

ATT

Page 65: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

TF : PROTECTION AREATF : PROTECTION AREA

65

CD

A

L

L = Radius . TAN(A/2)

Radius

SS'

R"R' R

C

S''

D

Ac

L1

L2

L1 = Radius L2 = Radius . TAN(A/2)

c : Pilot reactionIf A<90° Then L1=Radius . TAN(A/2)

SS'

R"R' R

C

S''

D

30°

A

MAX(A/2,30°)

SS'

R"R' R

C

S''

D

c'

S''

S

S'

R"

R

R'

30°

c' : Pilot reaction + Bank angle

SS'

R"R' R

C

S''

DS''

S

S'

R"

R

R'

WP1

WP4

WPTP2

WPTP3

Page 66: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

66

C

C= Pilot reaction + bank angle delay

DF : PROTECTION AREADF : PROTECTION AREADF : PROTECTION AREADF : PROTECTION AREA

A/2A/2

Page 67: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

67

MISSED MISSED APPROACH APPROACH SEGMENTSEGMENT

MISSED MISSED APPROACH APPROACH SEGMENTSEGMENT

Some RNAV systems are disconnected in case of

missed approach Plan a dead reckoning track

Protection area splays at 15° from earliest MAWPComplete MOC within the secondary area (for class

A GNSS )

Page 68: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

68

MISSED APPROACHMISSED APPROACH

Area Width at

MAWP

15 °Splay from earliest

MAWP +

Area Width at MATWP

COMPARE

> :Solution1 < :Solution2

Page 69: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

69

Check listCheck listCheck listCheck list

Strategy

A/C Equipment

Nominal trajectory

Minimum distances

Path terminator

XTT- ATTArea width

Protection area

Turning area Earliest [R” - R’] Latest [S” - S’]

Wind spiralLow speed accomodation

Connecting point / WP

Minimal altitudeMOC Slope

Flight simulation

Data in WGS84

Page 70: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

70

My personal point of viewMy personal point of viewMy personal point of viewMy personal point of view

Users should gain benefits from RNAVUsers should gain

benefits from RNAVMature design criteria

are availableMature design criteria

are available

Safety relies on communication and training

Safety relies on communication and training

On line help : will existEcacnav.com

RNP concept instead of sensor concept

RNP concept instead of sensor concept

Page 71: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

71

Any questions?

Page 72: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

72

Uncertainty Area Uncertainty Area

GOOD GEOMETRIE BAD GEOMETRY

DILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISIONDILUTION OF PRECISION

Page 73: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

73

WAYPOINTWAYPOINTWAYPOINTWAYPOINT

Expressed in WGS84 coordinates IAWP, IWP, FAWP, MAWP, MAHWP

Fly-by waypoint

Symbol :

Fly-over waypoint

Symbol :

Page 74: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

74

WP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BYWP1 : FLY-OVER WP2 : FLY-BY

Stabilisation distances are necessaryStabilisation distances are necessary

Page 75: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

75

Page 76: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

76

MISSED APPROACHMISSED APPROACH

SOC

15°

MAWP TWP

Page 77: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

77

MISSED APPROACHMISSED APPROACH

15°

SOC

MAWP TWP

Page 78: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

78

MISSED APPROACHMISSED APPROACH

15°

SOC

MAWPTWP

Page 79: 1 PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA Presented by Eliane Belin DGAC - ENAC eliane.belin@enac.fr

79