Recycling of hazardous waste from tertiary aluminium 1

industry in a value-added material 2

3

Laura Gonzalo-Delgado1, Aurora López-Delgado1*, Félix Antonio López1, Francisco 4

José Alguacil1 and Sol López-Andrés2 5

6

1Nacional Centre for Metallurgical Research, CSIC. Avda. Gregorio del Amo, 8. 28040. 7

Madrid. Spain. 8

2Dpt. Crystallography and Mineralogy. Fac. of Geology. University Complutense of 9

Madrid. Spain. 10

*Corresponding author e-mail: alopezdelgado@cenim.csic.es 11

12

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk

Provided by Digital.CSIC

https://core.ac.uk/display/36055163?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=pdf-decoration-v1

Abstract 13

14

The recent European Directive on waste, 2008/98/EC seeks to reduce the 15

exploitation of natural resources through the use of secondary resource management. 16

Thus the main objective of this paper is to explore how a waste could cease to be 17

considered as waste and could be utilized for a specific purpose. In this way, a 18

hazardous waste from the tertiary aluminium industry was studied for its use as a raw 19

material in the synthesis of an added value product, boehmite. This waste is classified as 20

a hazardous residue, principally because in the presence of water or humidity, it releases 21

toxic gases such as hydrogen, ammonia, methane and hydrogen sulphide. The low 22

temperature hydrothermal method developed permits the recovery of 90% of the 23

aluminium content in the residue in the form of a high purity (96%) AlOOH (boehmite). 24

The method of synthesis consists of an initial HCl digestion followed by a gel 25

precipitation. In the first stage a 10% HCl solution is used to yield a 12.63 g.l-1 Al3+ 26

solution. In the second stage boehmite is precipitated in the form of a gel by increasing 27

the pH of the acid Al3+ solution by adding 1M NaOH solution. Several pH values are 28

tested and boehmite is obtained as the only crystalline phase at pH 8. Boehmite was 29

completely characterized by XRD, FTIR and SEM. A study of its thermal behavior was 30

also carried out by TG/DTA. 31

32

Key words: hazardous waste, tertiary aluminium industry, recycling, boehmite, 33

hydrothermal process 34

35

1. Introduction 36

37

Aluminium is the most widely used non-ferrous metal. More than 60 million tons of this 38

metal are consumed in packaging, cars, aircraft, buildings, machinery and thousands of 39

other products. Primary aluminium is obtained from its main raw material, bauxite, by 40

electrolytic reduction of alumina dissolved in a cryolite bath. Although few compounds 41

of aluminium are classified as toxic according to Annex 1 of the European Economic 42

Union Council (EEC) Directive 67/1548, the industry itself is considered to be one of 43

the most polluting, and aluminium production has been classified as carcinogenic for 44

humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 1987). When 45

aluminium products reach their end of their useful life, they become scrap, and as a 46

result, a new industry has grown up over the last few decades. This is the secondary 47

industry, which has developed the tools and technology to use this scrap as its raw 48

material. Thus, secondary aluminium is obtained by processes involving the melting of 49

aluminium scrap and other materials or by-products containing this metal, and the 50

technologies used vary from one plant to another depending on the type of scrap, the 51

oxide content, and the impurities, etc. According to the International Aluminium 52

Institute (IAI 2010) in 2006, 16 million tones of total world production of aluminium 53

came from the secondary industry. In Europe, about 40% of aluminium demand is 54

satisfied by recycled material. In Spain, secondary aluminium production (refiners) 55

practically doubled in only ten years, from 173 kt in 1997 to 345 kt in 2007 (OEA 56

2010). 57

As there is a market for the slag produced in the secondary industry, a tertiary 58

industry has come into being, whose business is to obtain marketable products from slag 59

milling. In this industry, slag is treated by milling, shredding and granulometric 60

classification processes to yield different size fractions which are commercialised 61

according to their aluminium content. The coarser the fraction, the higher the 62

aluminium content, and thus the more valuable the product. The finest fraction from the 63

milling process constitutes the “Hazardous Aluminium Waste” named hereinafter as 64

HAW, which is kept in secure containers in special waste storage facilities. HAW is a 65

very fine grey-coloured powdery solid with a characteristic odour (due to its aluminium 66

nitride, carbide and sulphide contents). It also contains other aluminium compounds 67

(metallic aluminium, corundum, spinel), quartz, calcite, iron oxide and other metal 68

oxides, chlorides and salts. Its chemical composition varies depending on the process 69

used to melt scrap (López et al. 2001; López-Delgado et al. 2007). 70

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA 1980) and the 71

European Union (Council Directive 1994) classify this material as a hazardous residue, 72

principally because of its poor chemical stability. European legislation defines the waste 73

as H12 (Donatello et al. 2010), because in the presence of water or humidity, HAW 74

releases toxic gases such as hydrogen, ammonia, methane and hydrogen sulphide, based 75

on the following reactions (López-Delgado et al. 2007): 76

77

2Al + 3H2O(l) 3H2(g) + Al2O3 ΔG025ºC=-208.0 kcal (1) 78

2AlN + 3H2O(l) 2NH3(g) + Al2O3 ΔG025ºC =-78.7 kcal (2) 79

Al4C3 + 6H2O(l) 3CH4(g) + 2 Al2O3 ΔG025ºC =-405.7 kcal (3) 80

Al2S3 + 3H2O(l) 3H2S(g) + Al2O3 ΔG025ºC =-61.4 kcal (4) 81

82

HAW has commonly been stockpiled in secure storage facilities in accordance with 83

safety regulations 67/548/EC (79/831/EC) and Directive 99/31/EC (European Directive 84

1999). Processes developed for the treatment of HAW related wastes have generally 85

sought to render them inert, e.g. by very high temperature thermal treatment (Lindsay 86

1995) or by stabilisation/solidification with cement or gypsum (López-Gómez and 87

López-Delgado, 2004; Shinzato and Hypolito, 2005). Other procedures were developed 88

to obtain valuable products, using synthesis and crystallization methods (Lin & Lo 89

1998; López-Delgado et al. 2010). Vitrification has also been studied as a way of 90

obtaining valuable glasses from waste similar to HAW, as an aluminium oxide source 91

(López-Delgado et al. 2009). However, much more research needs to be done to find 92

commercial uses for this waste, in accordance with the recent European Directive on 93

waste, 2008/98/EC (European Directive 2008), which seeks to reduce the use of natural 94

resources by means of secondary resource management. This Directive also includes a 95

new status for waste, which is defined as “end-of-waste”. Several requirements have to 96

be fulfilled by the waste in order for it to attain that status. These are: i) the substance is 97

commonly used for specific purposes, ii) markets exist for the substance, iii) the 98

substance meets the technical requirements for the specific purposes and fulfils the 99

existing legislation and standards applicable to products, and iv) the use of the 100

substance will not lead to an overall adverse impact on the environment or human 101

health. Recycling is therefore, acknowledged to be the best rational way of making use 102

of resources that would otherwise end up being dumped and/or discarded. 103

Boehmite, an aluminium oxyhydroxyde described by the general formula 104

AlOOH.nH2O, which crystallized within an orthorhombic system with a lamellar 105

structure, is an important chemical used in many industries such as ceramics, 106

composites, cement and derived-materials, paints and cosmetics. One of its most 107

important applications is as a precursor of the major industrial catalysts supports: γ-108

alumina (Raybaud et al., 2001). Applications of boehmite depend mostly on its physic-109

structural properties, and these are very sensitive to the synthesis parameters (Okada et 110

al. 2002).The hydrothermal process is a traditional method of boehmite synthesis in 111

which inorganic aluminium salts of analytical grade (high purity) are commonly used as 112

raw materials (Mishra et al., 2000, Li et al. 2006, Liu et al. 2008). This paper reports on 113

the recycling of hazardous waste in an added value material. The purpose is then, to use 114

hazardous waste as the raw material for the synthesis of boehmite. This means working 115

towards the transformation of a waste into an “end-of-waste”, the new concept defined 116

in the European Directive on waste, as mentioned above (European Directive 2008). 117

118

2. Experimental 119

120

2.1. Materials 121

122

A hazardous aluminium waste (HAW) sample was obtained from a slag milling 123

installation of a tertiary aluminium company in Madrid (Spain). Slag is shredded in 124

autogenous mills, and different size fractions were obtained. HAW is the powdery solid 125

(d90 < 100 µm) which is captured by suction systems and treated in sleeve filters. 126

From the point of view of the chemical and mineralogical composition, this 127

waste is highly heterogeneous because it is entirely dependent on the type of slag that is 128

milled. So, a preliminary homogenisation process was carried out. The as-received 129

waste (25 kg) was homogenised in a mixer and then successively quartered to obtain a 130

representative sample of 1 kg. This sample was then placed in an automatic sample 131

divisor to obtain 100 g fractions. HCl 37% (Panreac) and NaOH pellets 98% (Panreac) 132

were used as reactants. 133

134

2.2. Methods 135

136

A low temperature hydrothermal method was used to recycle HAW into an 137

added-value material. The process consisted of two stages: the first one aimed at 138

recovering the aluminium content of the HAW by dissolving it in an acid medium; and 139

the second one, dealt with the value of the aluminium recovered in the first stage by 140

means of its precipitation as boehmite. In the first stage (acid digestion) 50 g of HAW 141

were digested in 500 ml of boiling HCl solution (120 ºC) in an open glass vessel to 142

dissolve the acid-soluble aluminium compounds. Two HCl solutions of concentrations 4 143

and 10 %, were used to study the effect on aluminium recovery. The reaction time 144

varied from 15 up to 180 min and the Al3+ concentration in solution was determined by 145

AAS, at the different reaction times. The suspension obtained was centrifuged and the 146

Al3+ solution was separated from the insoluble solid. This solid was characterised by 147

chemical analysis and XRD. The acidic Al3+ solution obtained at this stage was then 148

subjected to the second stage (gel precipitation), in which a 1M NaOH solution was 149

added dropwise to a magnetically stirred 100 ml of Al3+ solution until reaching pH 150

values of 7, 8 and 9. This second stage was performed at room temperature and 151

pressure. A gel started to precipitate from the first drop and was aged with continuous 152

stirring for 24 hours, after which it was separated by centrifugation and washed with 153

deionised water until the total chloride was removed. The gel was dried at 60ºC for 4 154

days and then crushed in a mortar to obtain a fine powder. 155

156

2.3. Analysis and Characterisation techniques 157

158

For the characterization of HAW, the next chemical analysis were performed: 159

Al, Fe, Mg and Ca were determined in extracted acid solution, by atomic absorption 160

spectroscopy (AAS, Varian Spectra model AA-220FS). The AlN content was 161

determined by analysing the nitrogen content, using the Kjendhal vapour distillation 162

method (Velp Scientifica UDK 130). The SiO2 was measured by a gravimetric method 163

(ASTM E 34-88) and C and S were determined by oxygen combustion in an induction 164

furnace (Leco model CS-244). Other elements such as Ti, Cu, Zn, Cr, etc., were 165

determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Philips, modelo PW-1480 dispersive energy 166

spectrophotometer, anode Sc/Mo, in working conditions of 80 kV and 35 mA). 167

The crystalline phases of HAW, the insoluble solid obtained from the acid 168

digestion and the boehmite samples were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker 169

D8 advance difractrometer, CuKα radiation). The morphological characterisation of the 170

samples was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Field emission Jeol 171

JSM 6500F). For observations, the powdered sample was embedded in a polymeric 172

resin. A graphite coating was used to make the sample conductive. 173

The skeletal density of boehmite was measured in a He displacement 174

pycnometer (Micromeritics Accupyc Mod 1330). The specific surface area (SBET) was 175

determined from the N2 adsorption isotherms (Coulter Mod SA3100) at a relative 176

pressure range of 0.04 to 0.2, after previously vacuum degassing the sample at 200 ºC. 177

The characterisation of boehmite was completed by Fourier transform infrared 178

spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet Magna-IR 550). Spectra were recorded through a disk 179

obtained by mixing the sample with CsI. Thermal analysis was performed by 180

simultaneous TG/DTA (SETARAM DTA-TG Setsys Evolution 500) at a heating rate of 181

20 ºC min-1, in a He atmosphere up to 1200 ºC. Alumina crucibles with 20 mg samples 182

were used. 183

184

3. Results and Discussion 185

186

3.1 Waste characterization 187

188

The chemical composition of the HAW is given in Table 1. The soluble aluminium 189

content refers to all the aluminium compounds which dissolve in hydrochloric acid, e.g. 190

metallic aluminium, aluminium nitride, sulphide and different types of salts. The total 191

aluminium content also refers to other compounds such as insoluble oxides. Figure 1 192

shows the XRD pattern for HAW, identifying the principal crystalline phases, such as 193

metallic aluminium, spinel, corundum, aluminium nitride. From the chemical analysis 194

and XRD study, the mineralogical distribution of the different major chemical elements 195

constituting HAW is shown in Table 2, along with their composition expressed as wt %. 196

Figure 2 shows a SEM image of HAW in which the morphology of the different phases 197

can be observed. Grains of metallic aluminium or alloyed aluminium of different size 198

and shape can be observed along with grains of spinel; small particles of corundum are 199

observed in disaggregation zones surrounding the metallic aluminium grains. 200

The hazardousness of HAW, as mentioned above, comes from the release of 201

gases in the presence of water, according to Eq. (1-4). From the contents of metallic 202

aluminium, and aluminium nitride and sulphide (Table 2) the calculated emission of H2, 203

NH3 and H2S, per ton of HAW are 388.3, 45.9 and 3.1 Nm3 respectively. 204

205

3.2. Acid digestion stage 206

207

The total aluminium content of HAW is 47.5 %, but only the part in the form of 208

hydrochloric acid soluble compounds is recovered as an Al3+ solution in the HCl 209

digestion stage. This value represents 78 % of the total aluminium content and comes 210

mainly from compounds such as Alº and AlN and other soluble compounds. The 211

recovery of aluminium increases with the reaction time. Thus when 10 % HCl was used 212

for a reaction time of 45 min, 73 % of the aluminium was dissolved and for a time of 213

150 min, 90 %. For the same time, an increase in the acid concentration yields a greater 214

aluminium recovery. So, when digestion was carried out with 4 % HCl the dissolved 215

aluminium percentage was lowerand for 45 min, only 54 % of the aluminium was 216

recovered. This indicates that the kinetics of aluminium dissolution from HAW with 217

HCl is faster with an acid concentration of 10 % than that of 4 % acid. The variation in 218

the Al3+ concentration in the acidic solution with time, using a 10 % HCl, is shown in 219

Figure 3. The [Al3+] concentration in the solution was 7.52 g.L-1 at a reaction time of 45 220

min, and the value increased up to 12.63 g.L-1, at 150 min. 221

The hydrochloric acid also partially dissolves iron oxide along with the 222

aluminium compounds. The variation in the Fe3+ concentration over time is also shown 223

in Figure 3. The curves of both metals exhibit similar behaviour. Therefore it is very 224

important to control the experimental conditions of acid digestion in order to achieve an 225

aluminium solution with low iron content. Nevertheless, several procedures such as 226

solvent extraction can be used to increase the purity of the Al3+ solution (Alguacil et al. 227

1987). In the present research, the Al3+ solution obtained directly from acid digestion 228

was used for the next stage (gel precipitation), i.e., to obtain boehmite. On the other 229

hand, the Al3+ solution obtained from the acid digestion of HAW may be used for many 230

other purposes, in order to obtain added-value material, apart from boehmite. 231

The composition of the solution obtained in the acid digestion stage (HCl 232

concentration: 10 % and reaction time: 150 min) and subjected to gel precipitation was 233

as follows: [Al3+] of 12.63 g.L-1 and [Fe3+] of 0.49 g.L-1. 234

The solid residue generated in this stage is composed of the insoluble 235

compounds of HAW. Its chemical analysis yielded: 69.50 % Al2O3, 20.19 % SiO2, 4.00 236

% MgO, 2.44 % TiO2, 0.51 % Fe2O3, 0.64 % CuO and 0.64 % Cl-. By XRD, only the 237

crystalline phases such as, corundum, spinel and quartz were identified. This solid may 238

therefore be considered as an inert material which could be suitable for using, for 239

example, in the cement industry. 240

241

3.3. Gel precipitation stage 242

243

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of the different gels obtained at pH 7, 8 and 9. 244

The pattern of the pH 7 gel shows several poorly defined broad diffraction bands around 245

28, 39, 49 and 65 º (2θ), but special attention must be paid to the band observed at a low 246

angle, around 7-8 º (2θ), which is common for lamellar structure compounds and seems 247

to indicate the formation of a transitional phase prior to boehmite formation. Different 248

authors (Okada et al. 2002, Ishikawa et al. 2006) have reported transitional phases in 249

aluminium hydroxide formation with very similar diffraction patterns to the pH 7 gel , 250

which are described as aluminium hydroxychloride. Chemical analysis of this gel 251

suggests a stoichiometry of Al(OH)2.8Cl0.2.1.2H2O for this phase. 252

The XRD pattern of pH 8 gel consists of five diffraction bands centred at 12.9, 253

28.1, 38.6, 49.5 and 64.1 º (2θ) which fit well with the diffraction pattern corresponding 254

to boehmite (AlOOH JCPDS no. 03-0066). The XRD pattern of pH 9 gel shows the 255

same bands as the pH 8 gel and two others centred at 18.44 and 20.66 (2θ), indicating 256

the presence of nordstrandite (Al(OH)3 JCPDS nº18-0050) along with the boehmite. 257

According to these results, the value of 8 seems to be the best pH to obtain boehmite 258

from HAW, as the only crystalline phase. For their part, the products obtained at pH 7 259

and pH 9 may be suitable for obtaining alumina by thermal treatment, although this 260

possibility is not studied in the present work. The percentage of aluminium recovered 261

from the acidic solution, increases with the pH, from the value of 95 % for pH7 to 96.2 262

% for pH8. In the case of pH 9, this value (94.1 %) is slightly lower than that of pH 8. 263

Then, this last value of pH is the best for obtaining the highest recovery of aluminium. 264

265

3.4. Characterization of boehmite 266

267

The crystallographic parameters of boehmite were determined from the XRD 268

pattern of gel pH 8. Table 3 shows the values of 2θ, d and hkl index. From reflection 269

020, which best characterises boehmite, the following unit cell parameters were 270

calculated: a=3.582 Å; b=13.678 Å; c=2.902 Å, in a face-centered rombic symmetry 271

and the space group Amam with Z (number of molecules per unit cell) of 4 (Tsukada et 272

al. 1999; Okada et al. 2002, Liu et al. 2008). The crystallite size, calculated from 273

Scherrer’s equation (Music et al. 1999) is 4.7 nm and indicates that boehmite is a 274

nanocrystalline sample. This low crystallinity is typical of products obtained by 275

precipitation in aqueous media. The aluminium oxy-hydroxides have low solubility and 276

this causes quick supersaturation and massive precipitation, which hinders the 277

crystalline developed (Tsukada et al. 1999, Li et al. 2006). 278

From chemical analysis of gel pH 8, the stoichiometry of the boehmite can be 279

formulated as AlOOH·0.8H2O, with a purity grade of 96%. Iron oxide, probably in the 280

form of FeOOH, and other minor compounds make up the rest of the composition. 281

The density of boehmite, determined in a helium pycnometer was 2.59 g.cm-3, 282

which fits well with bibliographic values ranging between 2.3-3.03 g.cm-3 (Gevert & 283

Ying 1999, Mishra et al. 2000). The SBET of sample was 205.2 m2.g-1, this value fits 284

well with that reported by Okada et al. (2002) for the same crystallite size boehmite, 285

obtained by a hydrothermal procedure using a pure aluminium nitrate solution as a 286

starting material. 287

The FTIR spectrum of pH 8 gel is shown in Figure 5. Three different zones can 288

be seen which correspond to the following wavenumber intervals: 1) 400-1200 cm-1, 2) 289

1300-2500 cm-1 and 3) 2800-4000 cm-1. Zones 1 and 3 show the typical sample 290

molecular vibrations and zone 2 provides information about the structural interconexion 291

of the crystalline cell. 292

Zone 1: the band corresponding to bending of O-H (ν3) appears at 1165 cm-1 as a 293

shoulder of the very strong band at 1068 cm-1, which corresponds to stretching vibration 294

ν2 Al=O. That weak vibration is characteristic of boehmite and its position is related to 295

the crystallinity of the sample (Ram 2001). The vibration ν4 Al=O appears between 880 296

and 740 cm-1 and is also very sensitive to the crystallinity of the sample. At 630 cm-1 the 297

band corresponding to bending in the plane of the angle HO-Al=O (ν5) is observed as a 298

very broad, strong band. 299

Zone 2: In this area, three bands are observed at 1649, 1515 and 1413 cm-1. 300

Their relative position and amplitude depend primarily on the degree of crystallinity of 301

the sample and they are only observed in amorphous or nanocrystalline boehmite. Thus 302

the first band is stronger than the others in nanocrystalline boehmite, and the second 303

band is the strongest in amorphous samples (Ishikawa et al. 2006). The assignation of 304

these bands is not clear because they cannot be assigned to overtones or combination 305

bands. Ram (2002) suggested that these bands are derived from the formation of 306

amorphous superficial structures in nanocrystalline hydrated boehmite. And this is the 307

case of the boehmite obtained from HAW. 308

Zone 3: This area corresponds to stretching vibrations of O-H bonds. A very 309

broad, strong band is observed at 3446 cm-1 with a shoulder at 3155 cm-1. A difference 310

of nearly 300 cm-1 between both bands is also found in the nanocrystalline structures. 311

Figure 6 shows the morphology of boehmite obtained at pH 8, revealing an 312

agglomerate of very fine spherical particles of 7-15 nm size. The grains are aggregates 313

of amorphous particles which coalesce without any long distance order. Grains of 314

crystalline appearance were not observed. This morphology agrees with the results of 315

the physical and structural properties. Fine particle compounds are commonly used to 316

obtain high densification ceramic products. 317

The TG and DTA curves of boehmite are shown in Figure 7. The DTA curve 318

shows a first endothermic effect which appears as a very broad, strong band between 319

45- 280 ºC with the maximum centered at 129 ºC. The mass loss associated with this 320

effect is 15.3 % and corresponds to a dehydration process of interlaminar water 321

according to eq. (5): 322

Al2O2(OH)2.nH2O Al2O2(OH)2 + nH2O (5) 323

The value of n calculated by mass loss is 0.60 which is slightly lower than that 324

obtained by chemical analysis and is consistent with the presence of a certain amount of 325

absorbed water. 326

A second endothermic effect is observed between 281-548ºC with an associated 327

mass loss of 14.0%. If all the water molecules had been lost at this stage in order to 328

form aluminium oxide, a mass loss of 15% would have been attained. This means that 329

the dehydratation process is not completed at this temperature and an intermediate 330

phase can be formulated according to eq. (6). 331

332

333

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Al2O335

338

into 339

thus 340

A fin341

with 342

alum343

342

Al2O343

347

possi348

Acco349

alum350

348

4. Co349

350

358

wast359

as a 360

temp361

alum362

high 363

the n364

ceram365

359

Ackn360

O2(OH)2 A

This effe

a transition

the interme

nal exotherm

a mass los

mina to α-Al

O2.76(OH)0.48

Then, th

ible to obta

ordingly, bo

minium oxid

onclusions

The resu

e, which ha

secondary s

perature hy

minium cont

purity boe

nanocrystall

mics industr

nowledgmen

Al2O3-ν/2(OH

ect is report

n alumina. T

ediate phase

mic peak is

s of 2.1%. T

2O3 accordi

8 Al2O3 +

he boehmite

ain α-Al2O3

oehmite can

des.

ults of this

as traditiona

source mate

drothermal

tent in HAW

ehmite (96%

line boehmi

ry.

nts

H)-ν + (2-ν)

ted by Alph

The value of

e can be form

s observed i

This effect

ing to eq. (7

+ 0.48H2O

e obtained

3 by therma

n be used as

study show

ally been con

erial for oth

process, a

W, but also

%). The mo

ite (AlOOH

)/2H20

honse et al.

f v was calc

mulated as A

in the DTA

is attributab

7).

(7)

from the h

al treatmen

s a precurso

w that a m

nsidered as

her industrie

allows not

its recover

orphologic

H) obtained m

(6

(2005) as

culated from

Al2O2.76(OH

A curve at 1

ble to the d

hazardous

nt at temper

r material f

material suc

a residue, c

es. Thus, th

only the

ry as an add

and crystal

make it a go

6)

the convers

m the mass

H)0.48 .

1073ºC, wh

dehydration

aluminium

ratures low

for the synth

ch as hazar

can effectiv

he method d

recovery o

ded value p

lographic c

ood candida

sion of boeh

loss as 0.4

ich is assoc

of the tran

waste mak

wer than 11

hesis of diff

rdous alumi

vely be recov

developed, a

of 90 % o

product, that

characteristi

ate for use i

hmite

8 and

ciated

sition

kes it

00ºC.

ferent

inium

vered

a low

of the

t is, a

ics of

in the

360

The authors thank the MEC for financing project CTM2005-01964 and the company 361

Recuperaciones y Reciclajes Roman S.L. (Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain) for supplying 362

HAW. Laura Delgado-Gonzalo is grateful to the CSIC (Spanish National Research 363

Council) for an I3P contract. 364

References 365

366 Alguacil, F.J., Amer, S., & Luis, A. (1987) The Application of Primene 81R for the 367 Purification of Concentrated Aluminium Sulphate Solutions from Leaching of Clay 368 Minerals. Hydrometallurgy 18, 75-92 369

Alphonse, P., & Courty, M. (2005). Structure and thermal behaviour of 370 nanocrystalline boehmite. Thermochimica Acta 425, 75-89 371

Council Directive of 12.12.1991 on hazardous waste 91/689/EEC, Council Directive 372 94/31/CE of 27.6.1994 amending Directive 91/689/EEC. 1994 373

Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and 374 repealing certain Directives, 2008 375

Donatello, S., Tyrer, M., & Cheeseman, C.R. (2010) EU landfill waste acceptance 376 criteria and EU hazardous Waste Directive compliance testing of incinerated sewage 377 sludge ash. Waste Management 30, 63-71 378

European Directive. Council Storage Directive 99/31/CE on the landfill of waste. 379 1999 380

European Directive. Dangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC), later amending 381 by Directive 79/831/EEC “relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of 382 dangerous substances” 383

Gevert, B.S., & Ying, Z. (1999) Formation of Fibrillar Boehmite. Journal of 384 Porous Materials 6, 63-67 385

IAI, International Aluminium Institute www.world-aluminium.org 2010 386

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Suplement 387 7 pag 89-91 (1987) 388

Ishikawa, T., Matsumoto, K., Kandori, K., & Nakayama, T. (2006) Synthesis of 389 layered zinc hydroxide chlorides in the presence of Al (III). Journal of Solid State 390 Chemistry 179, 1110-1118 391

Li, Y., Liu, J., & Jia, Z. (2006) Fabrication of boehmite AlOOH nanofibers by a 392 simple hydrothermal process. Materials Letters 60, 3586-3590 393

Lin, S.H., & Lo, M.C. (1998). Recovery of aluminum alum from waste anode-394 oxidizing solution. Waste Management 18, 281-286 395

Lindsay. R.D. Process for treatment of reactive fines; U.S. patent nº US5613996; 396 1995 397

Liu, Y., Ma, D., Han, X., Bao, X., Frandsen, W., Wang, D., & Su, D. (2008) 398 Hydrothermal synthesis of microscale boehmite and gamma nanoleaves alumina. 399 Materials Letters 62, 1297-1301 400

López, F.A., Peña, M.C., & López-Delgado, A. (2001) Hydrolysis and Heat 401 Treatment of Aluminium Dust. Journal of the Air & Waste Management 402 Association. 51, 903-912 403

López-Delgado, A., López, F.A., Gonzalo-Delgado, S., López-Andrés, S., & 404 Alguacil, F.J. (2010) Study by DTA/TG of the formation of calcium aluminate 405 obtained from an aluminium hazardous waste. Journal of Thermal Analysis & 406 Calorimetry 99, 999-1004 407

López-Delgado, A., Tayibi, H., Alguacil, F.J., & López, F.A. (2009) A hazardous 408 waste from secondary aluminium metallurgy as a new raw material for calcium 409 aluminate glasses. Journal of Hazardous Materials A65, 180-186 410

López-Delgado, A., Tayibi, H., & López, F.A. (2007) Treatments of aluminium 411 dust: a hazardous residue from secondary aluminium industry. Focus on hazardous 412 materials research. Edit. Mason, L.G. Nova Publishers, pp. 1-52 413

López-Gómez, F.A., & López-Delgado, A. (2004) Procedimiento de 414 estabilización/compactación de polvos de aluminio, Spanish patent nº 415 ES2197797B1 416

Mishra,D., Anand, S., Panda, R.K., & Das, R.P. (2000) Hydrothermal preparation 417 and characterization of boehmites. Materials Letters 42, 38-45 418

Music, S., Dragcevic, D., & Popovic, S. (1999) Hydrothermal crystallization of 419 boehmite from freshly precipitated aluminium hydroxide. Materials Letters 40, 269-420 274 421

OEA, Organization of European Aluminium Refiners and Remelters www.oea-422 alurecycling.org. 2010 423

Okada, K., Nagashima, T., Kameshima, Y., Yasumori, A., & Tsukada, T. (2002) 424 Relationship between Formation Conditions, Properties, and Crystallite Size of 425 Boehmite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 253, 308-314 426

Lindsay, R.D. Process for treatment of reactive fines, U.S. patent nº US5613996, 427 1995 428

Ram S., (2001) Infrared spectral study of molecular vibrations in amorphous, 429 nanocrystalline and AlO(OH) γH2O bulk crystals. Infrared Physics & Technology 430 42, 547-560 431

Raybaud P., Digne M., Iftimie R., Wellens W., Euzen P., & Toulhoat H. (2001) 432 Morphology and surface properties of boehmite: a density functional theory study. 433 Journal of Catalysis 201, 236-246 434

Shinzato, M.C., & Hypolito, R. (2005) Solid waste from aluminium recycling 435 process: characterization and reuse of its economically valuable constituents. Waste 436 Management 25, 37-46 437

Tsukada, T., Seqawa, H., Yasumori, A., & Okada, K. (1999) Crystallinity of 438 boehmite and its effect on the phase transition temperature of alumina. Journal of 439 Materials Chemistry 9, 549-553 440

U.S. EPA, 1980. Definition of hazardous waste, EPA/40 CFR/Part. 261.3, Federal 441 Register 442

443

444

445

Figure legends 446

Fig.1. XRD pattern of hazardous aluminium waste (HAW). (1: Alº, JCPDS 04-0787; 2: 447

AlN, JCPDS 76-0565; 3: Al2O3, JCPDS 81-2266; 4: MgAl2O4, JCPDS 21-1152; 5: 448

SiO2, JCPDS 85-0865, 6: CaCO3, JCPDS 85-1108). 449

Fig.2. SEM image of HAW. (1: Alº, 2: Al alloyed with Fe/Cu, 3: MgAl2O4, 4: Al2O3) 450

Fig.3. Variation in [Al3+] and [Fe3+] in the acid solution obtained with 10% HCl. 451

Fig.4. XRD patterns of gel obtained at pH 7 (a), pH 8 (b) and pH 9 (c). (1: 452

Al(OH)2.8Cl0.2.1.2H2O; 2: boehmite, AlOOH, JCPDS no. 03-0066; Norstrandite, Al(OH)3, 453

JCPDS nº18-0050). 454

Fig.5. FTIR spectrum of boehmite obtained from HAW. 455

Fig.6. SEM micrograph of boehmite obtained from HAW. 456

Fig.7. DTA/TGA curves of boehmite obtained from HAW. 457

458

459

Table1. Chemical composition of HAW. 460

Element Weigh ( %)

Altotal 47.45±0.05

Alsoluble 36.87±0.02

SiO2 8.0±0.5

C 1.06±0.01

N 2.88 ± 0.02

S 0.14±0.01

Cl 1.54±0.06

F 0.59±0.09

CaO 4.6±0.2

MgO 4.2±0.1

Fe2O3 1.8±0.06

Na2O 1.67±0.06

TiO2 1.53±0.06

CuO 0.68±0.03

K2O 0.46±0.03

ZnO 0.32±0.02

PbO 0.12±0.01

Cr2O3 0.11±0.01

461

462

Table 2.- Mineralogical distribution and weight percentage of the major chemical 463

elements present in HAW. 464

Elements Mineralogical phases Weight %

Al Al0

Corundum, Al2O3

Spinel, MgAl2O4

Aluminium Nitride, AlN

Aluminium Sulfide, Al2S3

31.2

20.0

15.0

8.4

0.7

Si Quartz, SiO2 8.0

Mg Spinel, MgAl2O4 15.0

Ca Calcite, CaCO3 8.2

Fe Hematite, Fe3O4 1.8

465

466

Table 3.- XRD reflections of the pH 8 gel diffractogram 467

Reflections 2θ d(Ǻ)

020 12.934 6.839

120 28.097 3.173

031 38.674 2.326

051 49.505 1.839

002 64.121 1.451

468

469

470

471

472 473 474 Fig. 1 475 476

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

50

100

150

200

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

6

6

6

3,5

5

55

54

2,4

4,5

5

4

4

4

cou

nts

2θ (º)

4

477

478 Fig 2. 479

480

481 482 483 484

Fig. 3 485 486 487

Al

(g L

-1)

Al

(g L

-1)

Al

(g L

-1)

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

15 30 45 60 90 120 180

Time (min)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

AlFe

[Al]

(g L

-1)

[Fe]

(g L

-1)

488

489 Fig. 4 490

491 492

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500

40

60

80

100zo ne 3 zone 2

Tran

smitt

ance

(%)

W avenum ber (cm -1)

3446

1649

3155

1515

1165

1068

1413

493 494

495 496 497 498

Fig. 5 499 500

501

502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521

Fig. 6 522 523

524

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0 D T A

Hea

t Flo

w (µ

V)

T em perature (ºC )

E xo

E n d o

T G

Mas

s Var

iatio

n (w

t,%)

525 526

Fig. 7 527