recognizing problems in reasoning. an error in reasoning. fallacies may be applied intentionally...

20
Recognizing problems in reasoning

Upload: jaime-shera

Post on 15-Jan-2016

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Recognizing problems in reasoning

Page 2: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

An error in reasoning. Fallacies may be applied intentionally or

may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument.

Page 3: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Recognizing fallacious arguments allows you to avoid falling into rhetorical traps and being convinced too easily.

Understanding how others construct arguments helps us to make informed choices about products, political candidates, leaders, even friends.

Understanding fallacies helps you to strategically employ them in your own rhetoric to argue more persuasively.

Page 4: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Formal—an argument that is deductively invalid. Deductive reasoning –general to specific;

theory-hypothesis-observation-confirmation Informal—an argument that does not

prove inductively probable. Inductive reasoning—specific to general;

observation-pattern recognition-hypothosis-theory

Page 5: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

1 : a deductive scheme of a formal argument consisting of a major and a minor premise and a conclusion (as in “every virtue is laudable; kindness is a virtue; therefore kindness is laudable”) 2 : a subtle, specious, or crafty argument 3 : deductive reasoning (Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary)

Valid: (1) All men are mortal. (2) Socrates is a man.

Therefore: (3) Socrates is mortal.

Page 6: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 7: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 8: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

An attack on a person or that person’s character (ethos) rather than on the argument itself

Page 9: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 10: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Assumes that popularity or growing popularity of an idea proves the value of that idea

Page 11: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 12: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

the truth of the conclusion is assumed by the premises

The name of this fallacy comes from the fact that the fallacious argument either; A) Does not truly answer the question posed or B) raises further questions which the arguer fails to answer

Also known as “circular reasoning”

Page 13: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 14: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Derives name from fox hunting, specifically from the practice of using smoked herrings, which are red, to distract hounds from the scent of their quarry

Use of an irrelevant or unrelated argument to distract an audience or speaker

Page 15: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 16: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

From the Latin “post hoc, ergo propter hoc”, or “after this, therefore because of this”.

Assumes that because B occurs after A, A caused B.

Page 17: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 18: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Attacking something that was never said nor directly implied; exaggerating the claims of an opponent to make the claims appear weaker.

Page 19: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument
Page 20: Recognizing problems in reasoning.  An error in reasoning.  Fallacies may be applied intentionally or may show faulty logic or a weakness in an argument

Definitions and examples adapted from: http://www.webenglishteacher.com/

fallacies.html http://www.fallacyfiles.org/bandwagn.html http://www.winthrop.edu/wcenter/

handoutsandlinks/fallacies.pdf http://www.carm.org/apologetics/fallacies.htm http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/

arguments.html