reading list international politics -...

1

University of Trento

School of International Studies

Reading List International Politics and Society

1) Essential Reading

Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett, eds., Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1998).

Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).

Blainey, Geoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War. Third ed. New York: The Free Press. Chapter 8.

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism

(New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

Dale C. Copeland, The Origins of Major War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000).

Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

Henk Erich Goemans, War and Punishment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).

Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane Robert O, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and

Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kalevi J. Holsti, Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1991)

Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press

1976).

Alastair Iain Johnston, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton

1995).

Peter Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York:

Columbia University Press, 1996).

Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics

(Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998).

Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton

University Press, 1984).

Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).

Robert O. Keohane and Helen V. Milner, eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics (New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Yuen Foong Khong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in

Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

David A. Lake and Robert Powell, eds. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton 1999).

Sean Lynn-Jones, ed. The Cold War and After: Prospects for Peace (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993).

Lisa Martin, Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation (Princeton University

Press, 2000).

2

John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton 2001).

Jonathan Mercer, Reputation and International Politics (Cornell, 1996), Chs. 1, 2, 4 (pp. 14-73, 110-153).

Helen V. Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and Information (Princeton

University Press, 1997).

Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bruce Russett and John Oneal, Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International

Organization (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).

Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kenneth A. Schultz, Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001).

Beth A. Simmons, Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years

(Princeton, 1994).

Snyder, Jack (1991), Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition, Ithaca: Cornell

University Press.

Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War (New York: Norton Critical Edition, 1998).

Stephen Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Cornell University Press, 1987).

Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State and War (Columbia University Press, 1959).

Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, (New York: Random House 1979).

Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999).

2) What is Theory in International Relations?

Almond, G. "Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science", pp. 13-31 in A Discipline Divided:

Schools Sects in Political Science, (Sage, 1990).

Almond, Gabriel and S.J. Genco, "Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics", World Politics, 29:4 (July 1977),

489-522.

Ashley, Richard. "The Achievements of Post-Structuralism", in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia

Zalewski, eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, 240-253.

Ashley, Richard. "The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International

Politics", Alternatives, 12:4 (October 1987), 403-434.

Ashley, Richard. "The Poverty of Neorealism", in Robert Keohane, ed., Neorealism and its Critics, 255-300.

Booth, K., S. Smith and M. Zalewski, International Theory, Positivism and Beyond, (1997).

Buzan, Barry and Richard Little, "Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What

to do About it" Millennium 30 (1) 2001, 19-39

Cox, Robert. "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory", Millennium,

10:2 (Summer 1981) or in Keohane, ed., Neorealism and its Critics, 204-254.

Cox, Robert. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York:

Columbia University Press,

Cox, Robert."Structural Issues of Global Governance: implications for Europe" in Gill ed., Gramsci, historical

materialism and international relations, pp 259-89.

3

Der Derian, James. "The Boundaries of knowledge and power in international relations", in J. Der Derian and

M J Shapiro, eds. International/Intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, 3-10.

Enloe, Cynthia. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: A Feminist Analysis of International Relations, 1-18, 177-194.

Falk, Richard. "Democratizing, internationalizing and globalizing", in Sakamoto, ed., Global Transformation,

pp. 475-502.

Gaddis, J.L."International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War", International Security, vol.17, no.3

(Winter 199\93), pp

Gill, S."Epistemology, Ontology and the Italian School", in Gill ed., Gramsci, historical materialism and

international relations (Cambridge: CUP, 1993), 21-48.

Hoffman, Mark."Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate", Millennium , 16:2 (Summer 1987).

Hoffmann, S. "An American Social Science: International Relations", Daedalus Vol. 106, No. 3 (1977), pp.

41-60.

Knutsen, T. A history of international relations theory (Manchester: U of Manchester Press, 1997)

Krippendorf, E. "The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations", Millennium Vol. 16,

No.2 (1987), pp. 207-214.

Lapid, Yosif."Quo Vadis International Relations? Further Reflections on the `Next Stage' of International

Theory", Millennium, 18:1 (Spring 1989)..5-58

Lijphart, Arendt."The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations", International Studies

Quarterly, 18:1 (March 1974), 41-74.

Linklater, Andrew. "The Achievements of Critical Theory", in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski,

eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, 279-298

Maclean, John."Political Theory, International Theory, and Problems of Ideology", Millennium, 10:2 (Summer

1981)

Neufeld, Mark."Interpretation and the 'science' of international relations", Review of International Studies, 19

(1993) 39-61.

Olson W. and N. Onuf, "The Growth of the Discipline: Reviewed", pp. 1-28 in S. Smith (ed.) International

Relations: British and American Approaches, (Oxford: Basil Blackburn, 1985).

Olson, William and AJR Groom, International Relations Then & Now (New York: Harper Collins, 1991)

Patomaki Heikki and Colin Wright, "After Postpositivism? The Promise of Critical Realism" International

Studies Quarterly 44 (2) 2000, 213-237.

Sakamoto, Y."A perspective on the changing world order: a conceptual prelude" in Sakamoto, ed., Global

Transformation, United Nations University Press, 1994, pp. 15-54

Schmidt, B. The Political Discourse of Anarchy (1998).

Shapiro, M. "Textualizing Global Politics", in J. Der Derian and M J Shapiro, eds. International/ Intertextual

relations: postmodern readings of world politics. (Lexington: Macmillan, 1989), 11-22.

Singer, J.D."Theorists and Empiricists: the Two-Culture Problem in International Relations", in James

Rosenau, et al., The Analysis of International Politics , 80-95.

Smith, S. "Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a

Social Science", Millennium Vol. 16, No. 2 (1987), pp. 189-206.

Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and international relations in the postmodern era. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press 1994.

4

Tanter, Raymond and Richard Ullman, Theory and Policy in International Relations.

Taylor, Charles. "Interpretation and the Sciences of Man", in Philosophy and the Human Sciences,

Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, 15-57.

Walker, R.B.J. "Dialogue: Towards a Critical Social Theory of International Politics", Alternatives 13 (1988),

77-102.

Waltz, Kenneth. "Laws and Theories", in Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: Random House,

1979), 1-17.

Waltz, Kenneth. "Structural Realism after the Cold War" International Security 25 (1) 2000, 5-41.

Wight, Martin. "Why is There No International Theory?" in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds.,

Diplomatic Investigations: Essays on the Theory of International Politics, 89-131.

3) International Relations Research Methods

Becker, G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, pp. 3-14.

Hirschleifer, Jack. “The Expanding Domain of Economics,” American Economic Review (December 1985),

pp. 53-68.

Hirschman, Albert O.“The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding,” World Politics 22:3 (April

1970), pp. 329-343.

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in

Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 1-3, 6.

McClelland, Peter. Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic

History (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975), pp. 65-104.

Philip E. Tetlock and Aaron Belkin, “Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical,

Methodological and Psychological Perspectives,” in Tetlock and Belkin, eds., Counterfactual Thought

Experiments, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996).

Powell, Robert. 2002. Game Theory, International Relations Theory, and the Hobbesian Stylization. In

Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. Milner. Washington DC:

American Political Science Association.

Rosenberg, A. “Can Economic Theory Explain Everything?” Philosophy of Social Science 9, pp. 509-529.

Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University

Press.

Walt, Stephen M. 1999. Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security

23 (4):5-48.

4) Theory and Practice in the Contemporary Discipline

Special Issue: "The Eighty Years' Crisis", Review of International Studies , December 1998.

Special Issue: "The Frontiers of Knowledge" Foreign Policy 110 Spring 1998, 29-165

Booth, Ken. "A Reply to Wallace" Review of International Studies 23 (3) 1997, 371-77.

Braudel, F. "Unity and diversity in the human sciences", pp 55-63, On History, University of Chicago Press,

1980.

5

Chan, S. "Critical theory, praxis and postmodernism", in Girard, Eberwein and Webb, eds., Theory and

Practice in Foreign Policy-Making (London: Pinter, 1994), 26-33.

Cox, Robert. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, ix-xii, 1-34, 99-

150, 393-403.

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man, New York, Avon Books, 1992, xi-xxiii; 3-12; 39-51

George, Jim. "Of incarceration and closure: neo-realism and the New/Old World Order, Millennium 1993,

Vol. 22, No. 2, pp 197-234.

Gusterson, H. "Missing the End of the Cold War in International Security " in Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey,

Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall, eds., Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the

Production of Danger (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1999), 319-46.

Haacke, Jurgen. "Theory and praxis in international relations: Habermas, self-reflection, rational

argumentation." Millennium 25, no.2 (Summer 1996): 255-289.

Hill, C. and Pamela Beshoff, eds., Two Worlds of International Relations (London: LSE/Routledge, 1994), 3-

25 and 211-25

Hoffmann, Stanley. "An American Social Science: International Relations", Daedalus, 106:3 (1977), 41-60.

Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon,

1990), 16-44.

Holsti, K.J. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory (New York: Allen and

Unwin, 1987)..

Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane and Stephen Krasner, eds., "International Organization at Fifty:

Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics" Special Issue of International Organization

52 (4) 1998, 645-727.

Kurth, James. "Inside the Cave: The Banality of IR Studies" The National Interest Fall 1998, 29-41.

Morgenthau, Hans. "The Intellectual and Political Functions of a Theory of International Relations", in Politics

in the Twentieth Century, Vol. I, The Decline of Democratic Politics, 62-78.

Morgenthau, Hans "The Commitments of a Theory of International Politics", Politics in the Twentieth Century,

Vol. I, The Decline of Democratic Politics , 55-61.

Smith, Steve. "Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations

as a Social Science", Millennium, 16:2 (1987), 189-206.

Smith, Steve. "Truth and Power: A reply to William Wallace" Review of International Studies 23 (4) 1997,

507-16.

Strange, Susan. "International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Mutual Neglect",

International Affairs 46:2 (1970), 304-315.

Wæver, Ole. "Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms" in Iver Neumann

and Ole Wæver, eds., The Future of International Relations: Master in the Making (London: Routledge,

1997), 1-38.

Wallace, William. "Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and practice in International Relations"

Review of International Studies 22 (3) 1996, 301-21.

Walt, Stephen. "International Relations: One World, Many Theories", "Special Issue: The Frontiers of

Knowledge" Foreign Policy 110 Spring 1998, 29-44.

6

Wendt, Alexander. "Collective Identity Formation and the International State", American Political Science

Review, vol.88, no.2 (June 1994)

Olson, William and Nicholas Onuf, "The Growth of the Discipline Reviewed", in Steve Smith, International

Relations: British and American Approaches, 1-28.

5) General Foreign Policy

"The State and American Foreign Economic Policy", special issue of International Organization, 42:1 (Winter

1988).

Carlsnaes, W. "The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis", International Studies Quarterly,

36:3 (1992), 245-270.

Doty, Roxanne. "Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International

Relations Theory" European Journal of International Relations 3 (3) 1997, 365-92.

Gill, Stephen. American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990), 57-

88.

Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981), 9-49.

Hidemi, S. "Agents, Structures, Narratives", European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3) 1999, 365-86.

Hollis, M. and Steve Smith, "Structure and Action: Further Comment" in Review of International Studies, 18:2

(April 1992), 187-188.

Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith, "Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations", Review of

International Studies, 17:4 (October 1991), 393-410.

Mastanduno, M. and J. Ikenberry, "Toward a Realist Theory of State Action", International Studies Quarterly,

33 (1989), 457-474.

Neack, Laura, Jeanne A.K. Hey, Patrick J. Haney, eds., Foreign policy analysis: Continuity and change in its

second generation (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1995)

Paterson, Thomas. "Defining and Doing the History of American Foreign Relations: A Primer", in Michael J.

Hogan and Thomas G. Paterson, Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations, 36-54

Putnam, Robert. "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games", International

Organization, 42:3 (Summer 1988), 428-460.

Robinson, William. Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention and hegemony (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1996),13-72.

Rosenberg, E.S. "Walking the Borders", in Michael J. Hogan and Thomas G. Paterson, Explaining the

History of American Foreign Relations.

Singer, J. David. "The Levels of Analysis Problem in International Relations", (1961) reprinted in James

Rosenau, ed. International Politics and Foreign Policy, 20-29.

Smith, Steve. "Theories of Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview", Review of International Studies, 12:1

(Jan. 1986), 13-29.

Wendt, A. "Bridging the theory/meta-theory gap in international relations", Review of International Studies,

17:4 (October 1991), 383-393.

Wendt, Alexander. "Levels of Analysis vs. Agents and Structures: Part III", Review of International Studies,

18:2 (April 1992), 181-186.

7

6) Foreign Policy : Regime Type and Foreign Policy

Barkawi, Tarak and Mark Laffey, "The imperial peace: democracy, force and globalization. European Journal

of International Relations 5 (4)1999, 403-434.

Doyle, Michael. "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs", Philosophy and Public Policy, vol.12., no.3

(1983), pp 205-235

Kahl, Colin. "Constructing A Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic

Peace Security Studies 8 (2-3)1998/99, 94-144.

Korany, B. "Foreign Policy in the Third World", International Political Science Review, vol.5, no.1 (1984), pp.

7-20.

Layne, Christopher. "Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace" International Security 19 (2) 1994, 5-

49.

Owen, John. "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace" International Security 19 (2) 1994, 87-125.

7) Foreign Policy Analysis: Foreign Policy Beyond the State

Hagan, Joe. "Domestic Political Explanations in the Analysis of Foreign Policy" in Neack, Hey and Haney,

eds. Foreign Policy Analysis , 117-43.

Ikenberry, John. "Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Policy", International

Organization, 42 (1) 1988, 219-243.

Skidmore, David and Valerie M. Hudson, eds., The Limits of state autonomy: societal groups and foreign

policy formulation (Boulder: Westview, 1993), 25-48, 237-266.

Kaldor, Mary. "'Civilising' Globalisation? The Implications of the 'Battle in Seattle'" Millennium 29 (1) 2000,

105-114.

Carothers, Thomas. "Civil society" Foreign Policy 117 1999-2000, 18-29.

Price, Richard. "Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines International

Organization 52 (3) 1998, 613-44.

Knopf, Jeffrey. Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on US Arms Control

Policy (Cambridge: CUP, 1998), 247-62.

Solingen, Etel. "The new multilateralism and nonproliferation: bringing in domestic politics"

Global Governance 1 (2) 95, 205-227.

Pasha, M.K. and David Blaney, “Elusive Paradise: The Promise and Peril of Global Civil Society",

Alternatives 23 (4) 1998, 417-450

8) Foreign Policy: Post-positivist Approaches to Foreign Policy Campbell, David. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, 1-83 and153-

262.

R.B.J. Walker, R.B.J. "Security, Sovereignty, and the Challenge of World Politics", Alternatives, 15:1 (Winter

1990), 3-27.

8

Doty, Roxanne. "Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency

Policy in the Phillippines" International Studies Quarterly 37 1993, 297-320.

Sylvan, David and Jennifer Milliken, "Soft Bodies, Hard Targets, and Chic Theories: US Bombing Policy in

Indochina" Millennium 25 (2) 1996, 321-59.

Shapiro, M.J. G. Matthew Bonham, and Daniel Heradstveit, "A Discursive Practices Approach to Collective

Decision-making", International Studies Quarterly, 32:4 (Winter 1988), 397-420.

9) Bureaucratic Politics and Organisation Process

Allison, Graham. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 10-37, 67-100, 144-84

Allison, G. and Morton Halperin, "Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications", World

Politics Spring 1972 (or in Raymond Tanter and Richard Ullman, Theory and Policy in International

Relations, 40-79).

Art, R.J. "Bureaucratic Politics and American Foreign Policy: A Critique", in G. John Ikenberry, American

Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays , 433-457.

Ball, Desmond. "The Blind Men and the Elephant: A Critique of the Bureaucratic Politics Theory", Australian

Outlook, 28 (April 1974).

Freedman, Lawrence. "Logic, Politics and Foreign Policy Processes: a Critique of the Bureaucratic Politics

Model", International Affairs (July 1976).

Krasner, Stephen. "Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland)", in G. John Ikenberry, American

Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays, 419-433.

Krasner, Stephen. "Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland)", in G. John Ikenberry, American

Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays , 419-433.

Nossal, K.R. "Bureaucratic Politics and the Westminster Model", in Robert Matthews, Arthur Rubinoff and

Janice Stein, International Conflict and Conflict Management, 120-127.

Welch, David. "The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect"

International Security 17 (2) 1992, 112-146.

10) Foreign Policy and Regime Type

Itty Abraham. The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: science, secrecy and the postcolonial state (London:

Zed Books, 1998)

Baker Fox, M. The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War II (Chicago University Press, 1959), 1-9

and 180-88

Bell, Wendell. "Independent Jamaica Enters World Politics: Foreign Policy in a New State", Political Science

Quarterly, vol.92, no.4 (Winter 1977-78)

Biddle, W. and John Stephens, "Dependent Development and Foreign Policy: The Case of Jamaica"

International Studies Quarterly 33 1989, 411-434.

David, Stephen. "Explaining Third World Alignment" World Politics 43 (2) 1991, 233-56.

East, Maurice. "Size and Foreign Policy Behaviour: A Test of Two Models", World Politics vol.25, no.4

(1973), 556-76

9

Flynn, G. and Henry Farrell, "Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE and the 'Construction' of

Security in Post-Cold War Europe" International Organization 53 (3) 1999, 505-535

Hey, Jeanne and Lynn Kuzma, "Anti-US Foreign Policy of Dependent States: Mexican and Costa Rican

Participation in Central American Peace Plans." Comparative Political Studies, 26 (1) 1993, 30-62.

Korany, B. "Foreign Policy Models and Their Empirical Relevance to Third World Actors: A Critique and An

Alternative", International Social Science Journal, vol.25, no.1 (1974), 70-94

Korany, B. "The Take-Off of Third World Studies? The Case of Foreign Policy", World Politics, vol.35, no.3

(1983), 465-87

Keohane, Robert. "Lilliputian Dilemmas", International Organization , vol.23., no.2 (1969), 291-310.

Moon, Bruce. "The Foreign Policy of the Dependent State", International Studies Quarterly, vol.27, no.3

(1983), 315-340.

Mead, Walter Russell. Special Providence.

11) Foreign Policy Beyond the State

Goldstein, Judith. "The Impact of Ideas on Trade Policy: The Origins of US Agricultural and Manufacturing

Policies", International Organization 43:1 (Winter 1989), 31-72.

Gourevitch, Peter. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Response to International Economic Crises.

Haggard, Stephan. "The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade

Agreements Act of 1934", International Organization, 42:1 (Winter 1988), 91-120.

Ikenberry, John. "The State and Strategies of International Adjustment", World Politics, 39:1, (October 1986),

53-77.

Ikenberry, John, David Lake, Michael Mastanduno, "Introduction: Approaches to Explaining American

Foreign Economic Policy", International Organization, 42:1 (Winter 1988), 1-14.

Katzenstein, Peter. "Introduction: Domestic and International Forces and Strategies of Foreign Economic

Policy", International Organization, 31:4 (Autumn 1977), 587-606.

Katzenstein, Peter. "Conclusion: Domestic Structures and Strategies of Foreign Economic Policy",

International Organization, 31:4 (Autumn 1977), 879-920 (or in Between Power and Plenty, 295-336).

Kolko, G. The roots of American foreign policy: an analysis of power and purpose. Boston, Beacon Press,

1969.

March, James and John Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics.

McGowan, Patrick and Stephen Walker, "Radical and Conventional Models of US Foreign Economic

Policymaking", World Politics, 33:3 (April 1981), 347-382.

McKeown, Timothy. "The Limitations of `Structural' Theories of Commercial Policy", International

Organization, 40:1 (Winter 1986), 43-64.

Moon, Bruce. "Political Economy Approaches to the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy" in Charles

Hermann, Charles W. Kegley Jr. and James Rosenau, eds. New Directions in the Study of Foreign

Policy. New York: Harper Collins, 1987, 33-52.

van der Pijl, Kees. The making of an Atlantic ruling class London, Verso, 1984.

12) Post-Positivist Approaches to Foreign Policy

10

Ashley, Richard. "Foreign policy as political performance", International Studies Notes, 1987.

Beer, Francis and Robert Hariman, eds., Post-Realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East

Lansing: University of Michigan, 1996.

Der Derian, James and Michael Shapiro, eds., International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of

World Politics.

Taylor, Peter J. Britain and the Cold War: 1945 as Geopolitical Transition.

13) War and the States System

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society, 3-22, 184-99.

Buzan, Barry."Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case", International

Organization, 38:4 (Autumn 1984), pp.597-624

Downs, George. "The Rational Deterrence Debate" World Politics, 41:2, 1989, 225-237.

Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, 45-90.

Gallie, W.B. Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy, 1-99, 133-141.

Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics, 186-210.

Herz, John. "Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma", World Politics, 2 (1950), 157-180.

Hobson, John.""Imperialism", in Marc A. Genest, ed., Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of

International Relations. Toronto: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1996, pp. 245-258

Howard, Michael. War in European History.

Jervis, Robert. The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy, 19-46, 147-170.

Jervis, Robert."War and Misperception", Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18:4 (Spring 1988), 675-700.

Kennedy, Paul.The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers.

Krause, Keith. "Rationality and Deterrence in Theory and Practice" in Craig Snyder, ed., Contemporary

Security and Strategy. New York: Routledge, 1999, 120-149.

Latham, Andrew. "Warfare Transformed: A Braudelian Perscpetive on the Revolution in Military Affairs"

European Journal of International Relations 8 (2) 2002, 231-66

Levy, Jack. "Domestic Politics and War", Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18:4 (Spring 1988), 653-673.

Levy, Jack. "The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence", in Philip Tetlock, et al, eds.,

Behavior, Society and Nuclear War , vol. 1, 209-233.

Mackinder, H."The Geographical Pivot of History", The Geographical Journal, 23:4 (April 1904), 421-444.

Macneill, William. The Pursuit of Power.

Morgenthau, Hans. "Death in the Nuclear Age", in Hans Morgenthau, Politics in the Twentieth Century, vol.

3, 19-28.

Morgenthau, Hans. Politics Among Nations, 58-85.

Paret, Peter. Clausewitz and the State, 3-35, 56-59, 110-119, 146-168, 354-395, 431-440.

Paret, Peter. Makers of Modern Strategy

Snyder, Glenn. "Deterrence and Defense", in R. Art and Ken Waltz, eds., The Use of Force, 123-141.

Suganami, Hidemi. On the Causes of War, 1-43, 153-210.

Tilly, Charles. "War Making and State Making as Organized Crime", in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer,

Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In, 169-191.

11

Tilly, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States, 67-95.

Tuathail, G. Critical Geopolitics. Minneapolis: Minnesota, 1996, 21-74.

Vasquez, John.The War Puzzle (Cambridge University Press, 1993)

Vasquez, John. "The Steps to War: Toward a Scientific Explanation of the Correlates of War Findings",

World Politics, 40:1 (October 1987), 108-145.

Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press,

1959, pp. 159-186

Williams, Michael. "Rethinking the `Logic' of Deterrence", Alternatives, 17 (1992), 67-93.

Wright, Quincy. A Study of War.

14) Strategy and Deterrence

Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Missile Age, 147-172, 264-304.

Clark, Ian. Limited Nuclear War, chapter 6.

Green, Philip. Deadly Logic: The Theory of Nuclear Deterrence , 255-276.

Huth, Paul and Bruce Russett, "Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference", World Politics 42:2

(July 1990), 466-501.

Johansen, Robert "Global Security Without Nuclear Deterrence", Alternatives, 12 (4) 1987, pp. 435-459

Kolkowicz, R. ed., The Logic of Nuclear Terror

Lawrence, Philip. "Nuclear Strategy and Political Theory: A Critical Assessment", Review of International

Studies 11:2 (April 1985), 105-121.

Lawrence, Philip. "Strategy, the State and the Weberian Legacy", Review of International Studies 13:4

(October 1987), 295-310.

Lebow, Richard and Janice Gross Stein, "Deterrence: The Elusive Dependent Variable", World Politics, 42(3)

(April 1990), 336-369.

Mearsheimer, John. "Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War", International Security, 15:1

(Summer 1990), 5-56.

Morgan, Patrick. Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis.

Mueller, John. "The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World", International

Security, 13:2 (Fall 1988), 55-79.

Schelling, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict, chapters 1 and 2 and passim.

Simes, Dimitri. "Deterrence and Coercion in Soviet Policy", International Security, 5:3 (Winter 1980/81), 80-

103.

Williams, Michael. "Neo-realism and the Future of Strategy", Review of International Studies, 19 (2) 1993,

103-121.

Williams, Phil. "Nuclear Deterrence" in Baylis, Booth, Garnett and Williams, Contemporary Strategy I:

Theories and Concepts, 113-139.

15) Redefining Security

Forum, "What is Security and Security Studies?' Revisited", Arms Control , 13:3 (December 1992), 463-544.

Booth, Ken. "Security and Emancipation", Review of International Studies , 17 (1991), 313-326.

12

Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Reinner, 1998),

21-47 and 195-213

Buzan, Barry. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security studies in the Post-Cold War

Era (Boulder: Lynne Rienner 1992).

Dalby, Simon. "Ecological Metaphors of Security: World Politics in the Biosphere" Alternatives, 23 (3) 1998,

291-319

Dalby, Simon. "Security, Modernity, Ecology: The Dilemmas of Post-Cold War Security Discourse",

Alternatives, 17 (1) 1992.

Dalby, Simon. "Threats from the South? Geopolitics, Equity and Environmental Security" in Daniel Deudney

and Richard Matthews, eds., Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics

(Albany: SUNY Press, 1999), 155-85.

Der Derian, James. "Global Events, National Security, and Virtual Theory" Millennium: Journal of

International Studies, 30 (3) 2001, 669-690.

Der Derian, James. "The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Neitzsche, and Baudrillard" in Ronnie Lipschutz,

ed., On Security (New York: Columbia, 1995), 24-45.

Enloe, Cynthia. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: A Feminist analysis of International Relations.

Klein, Bradley. "After Strategy: The Search for a Post-Modern Politics of Peace", Alternatives, 13 (1988),

293-318.

Kolodziej, Edward. "Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector!", International Studies Quarterly, 36

(1992), 421-438.

Krause, Keith and Michael Williams, "From Strategy to Security: The Foundations of Critical Security

Studies", in Krause and Williams, eds, Critical Security Studies, 33-60.

Shaw, Martin. "There is No Such Thing as Society: Beyond Individualism and Statism in International

Security Studies", Review of International Studies 19 (1993), 159-175.

Shaw, Martin. Post-Military Society.

Tickner, J. Ann. "Re-visioning Security", in Ken Booth and Steve Smith, eds., International Relations Theory

Today, pp. 175-197.

Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security.

Walker, R.B.J. "The Subject of Security", in Krause and Williams, eds, Critical Security Studies, 61-82.

Walt, Stephen. "The Renaissance of Security Studies,' International Studies Quarterly, 35 (1991), 211-239.

16) Realism and Liberalism

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Columbia University Press, 1977).

Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism

(New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

Carr, E.H. The Twenty Years' Crisis, (London: Macmillan, 1946).

Hobbes, Thomas. 1968 (1651). Leviathan. New York: Penguin, Chapter 13.

Hoffmann, Stanley. The State of War: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (New York:

Praeger, 1965).

Hoffmann, Stanley.“Liberalism and International Affairs,” in Hoffmann, Janus and Minerva: Essays on the

Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986), pp. 394-417.

13

Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2):167-214.

Kagan, Donald. The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969).

Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane Robert O, and Stephen D. Krasner. 1998. International Organization and the

Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645-685.

Keohane, Robert O. “Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics,” in Keohane, International

Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989), pp. 1-11.

Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton

University Press, 1984). Chapter 1.

Keohane, Robert O. ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).

Krasner, Stephen. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy


Kydd, Andrew. 1997. Sheep in Sheep's Clothing: Why Security Seekers Do not Fight Each Other. Security

Studies 7 (1):114-155.

Lake, David A., and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton:

Princeton University Press.

Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24 (2):5-

55. Plus responses in 25(1).

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.

Michael Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars (Basic Books, 1977), Chs. 4-6 (pp. 51-108).

Milner, Helen V. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique,” Review of

International Studies 17, no. 1 (January 1991), pp. 67-86.

Moravcsik, Andrew. "Taking Preferences Seriously: Liberalism and International Relations Theory,"

International Organization (Fall 1997), 512-553.

Morgenthau, Hans. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf, 1960), pp.

3-15, 228-235.

Singer, J. David .“The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” World Politics 14:1 (October 1961), pp.

89-92 only.

Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War (New York: Norton Critical Edition, 1998), Book I 1-99, 139-146 (pp. 4-

39, 54-57); Book II 34-54 (pp. 71-79); Book III 36-50, 70-85 (pp. 113-119, 127-132); Book V 84-116 (pp.

227-231); Book VI, 6-31 (pp. 235-244).

von Clausewitz, Carl. On War, edited and translated by Peter Paret, Michael Howard, and Bernard Brodie


Walt, Stephen M. 2002. The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition. In Political Science: the State of

the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. Washington DC: American Political Science

Association.

Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War (Columbia University Press, 1959.

Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979) Chapters 4, 5, 6.

Wolfers, Arnold.“Statesmanship and Moral Choice,” in Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration (Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press, 1962), Chapter Four.

17) Beyond Rationalist Approaches

14

Ashley, Richard K. 1986. The Poverty of NeoRealism. In Neorealism and its Critics, edited by Keohane,

Robert O. New York: Columbia University Press, 255-300.

Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International

Organization 52, no. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 887-917.

Gilpin, Robert. “Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” in Keohane, ed. Neo-Realism and its Critics,

pp. 301-321.

Jervis, Robert. “Political Implications of Prospect Theory,” in Barbara Farnham, ed. Avoiding Losses/Taking

Risks: Prospect Theory and International Conflict (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1994), pp. 23-40.

Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University

Press. Chapters 1-4.

Johnston, Alastair Iain .“Thinking about Strategic Culture,” International Security 19:4 (Spring 1995), pp. 32-

64.

Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton:

Princeton University Press.

Larson, Deborah Welch. 1985. Origins of Containment A Psychological Explanation. Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.

International Organization 52 (4):943-969.

McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy.

Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Risse, Thomas. 2002. Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversation across Paradigms.

In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. Washington

DC: American Political Science Association.

Ruggie, John Gerard. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neo-Realist Synthesis,”

in Keohane, ed., Neo-Realism and its Critics.

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chapter 1.

18) Domestic Society and Institutions

Allison, Graham. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” American Political Science Review 63

(September 1969), pp. 689-718.

Alt, James and Michael Gilligan, “The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective

Action Problems and Domestic Political Institutions,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2, no. 2 (1994), pp.

165-192.

Downs, George W., and David M. Rocke. 1990. Tacit Bargaining, Arms Races, and Arms Control. Ann Arbor:

University of Michigan. Pages 92-100.

Doyle, Michael . “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12,

no. 3 (Summer, 1983), pp. 205-235.

15

Fearon, James. “Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations,” Annual Review of Political

Science (1998) 1, pp. 289-313.

Frieden, Jeffry A. 1999. Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In Strategic Choice and

International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Katzenstein, Peter J. ed., Between Power and Plenty (University of Wisconsin Press, 1978).

Kennan, George F. “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” in Kennan, American Diplomacy, 1900-1950 (Mentor

Books, 1951), pp. 89-105; reprinted in Foreign Affairs, Spring 1987, pp. 852-68.

Lohmann, Susanne and Sharyn O'Halloran, “Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Theory and

Evidence,” International Organization 48, no. 4 (Autumn 1994), pp. 595-632.

Mansfield, Edward and Jack Snyder, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security

(Summer 1995), pp. 5-38.

Milner, Helen and David Yoffie, “Between Free Trade and Protectionism: Strategic Trade Policy and a

Theory of Corporate Trade Demands,” International Organization 43 (Spring 1989), pp. 239-273.

Milner, Helen V. .Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and Information (Princeton

University Press, 1997), Chapters 3 and 4. (pp. 67-134)

Milner, Helen V. “Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade,” World Politics, vol. 40, no. 3 (April, 1988), pp.

350-376.

Owen, John. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security 19:2 (Fall 1994), pp. 87-

125.

Posen, Barry. The Sources of Military Doctrine (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984), Chapters 1, 2, 7, pp.

13-80; 220-244.

Rogowski, Ronald. “Institutions as Constraints on Strategic Choice,” in Lake and Powell, eds. Strategic

Choice and International Relations, pp. 115-136.

Ruggie, John Gerard “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the

Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982), pp. 379-415.

Snyder, Jack. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca: Cornell University

Press, 1991), 1-111, 235-322.

Thucydides, Peloponnesian War, p. 45.

19) Global Society and Global Politics

Cederman, Lars-Erik. Emergent Actors in World Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997),

Chapters 3-4, 6-7 (pp. 37-108, 136-183)

Doyle, Michael W. “Politics and Grand Strategy,” in Richard Rosecrance and Arthur A. Stein (eds.), The

Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993) pp. 22-47.

Frieden, Jeffry A. “Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global

Finance,” International Organization vol. 45, no. 4 (Autumn 1991), pp. 425-51.

Garrett, Geoffrey and Peter Lange, “Political Responses to Interdependence: What's “Left” for the Left?,”

International Organization 45:4 (Autumn 1991), pp. 539-564.

Gourevitch, Peter A. Politics in Hard Times (Cornell University Press, 1986).

16

Gourevitch, Peter. “The Second Image Reversed,” International Organization, vol. 32, no. 4, (Autumn, 1978),

pp. 881-912.

Haggard, Stephan “The Newly Industrializing Countries in the International System,” World Politics 38

(January 1986), pp. 343-370.

Hoffmann, Stanley “Domestic Politics and Interdependence,” in Janus and Minerva, pp. 268-289.

Kahler, Miles. 1999. Evolution, Choice and International Change. In Strategic Choice and International

Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Katzenstein, Peter J. .Small States in World Markets (Cornell University Press, 1985).

Katzenstein, Peter J. “The Small European States in the International Economy,” in John G. Ruggie (ed.),

The Antinomies of Interdependence: National Welfare and the International Division of Labor (Columbia

U. Press, 1983), Ch. 2, pp. 91-130.

Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International

Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998), Chs. 1, 3. (pp. 1-38, 79-120)

Keohane Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition,

second edition, (Boston: Little-Brown, 1989), pp. 3-37.

Keohane, Robert O. and Helen V. Milner, eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics (New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1996), Chs. 1-3, 5, 7. (pp. 3-75, 108-136, 159-185)

Lake, David. “International Economic Structures and American Foreign Economic Policy,” World Politics 35

(June 1983), pp. 517-543.

McKeown, Timothy. “A Liberal Trade Order? The Long-Run Pattern of Imports to the Advanced Capitalist

States,” International Studies Quarterly 35 (July 1991), pp. 151-172.

Moravcsik, Andrew. The Choice for Europe (Cornell University Press, 1998), Ch. 2.

Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.


Resende-Santos, Joao. 1996. Anarchy and the Emulation of Military Systems: Military Organization and

Technology in South America, 1870-1914. Security Studies 5 (3).

Risse, Thomas and Stephen C. Ropp, “International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change:

Conclusions,” in Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. The Power of Human

Rights: International Norms and Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp.

234-278.

Rogowski, Ronald . “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade,” American Political Science

Review 81, no. 4 (December 1987), pp. 1121-38.

Simmons, Beth A. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years

(Princeton, 1994), Chs. 1-3. (pp. 3-105)

Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chapter 8.

Webb, Michael. “International Economic Structures, Government Interests, and International Coordination of

Macroeconomic Adjustment Policies,” International Organization 45 (Summer 1991), pp. 309-342.


Chapters 3 and 4.

17

20) Power and Conflict

Baldwin, David A. “Power Analysis and World Politics,” World Politics 31 (January 1979), pp. 161-194.

Blainey, Geoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War. Third ed. New York: The Free Press. Chapter 8.

Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War”. International Organization 49 (3):379-414.

George, Alexander L, and Richard Smoke. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and

Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

Jack S. Levy, “The Causes of War,” in Philip E. Tetlock, et. al., eds., Behavior, Society and Nuclear War, vol.

1 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 209-333.

Krasner, Stephen D. “State Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade,” World Politics vol. 28, no. 3 (April

1976), pp. 317-347.

Lebow, Richard Ned. 1981. Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis. Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press.

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.

Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Chapters 2, 3.

Snyder, Glenn H., and Paul Diesing. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decisionmaking and System

Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wagner, R. Harrison. 1994. Peace, War and the Balance of Power. American Political Science Review 88

(3):593-607.

Weber, Steven. “Realism, Detente and Nuclear Weapons,” International Organization (Winter 1990), pp. 55-

82.

21) Domestic Institutions and Conflict

Brown, Michael E., Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller, eds. 1996. Debating the Democratic Peace.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. “An

Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (4):791-807.

Evans, Peter, Harold K. Jacobson, and Robert Putnam, eds. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Politics

and Domestic Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), Chapters by Odell, Kahler, Evans.

(pp. 233-264, 363-394, 397-430)

Fearon, James. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes,” American

Political Science Review 88, no. 3 (Sept. 1994), pp. 577-592.

Hobson, J. A. “Imperialism: A Study,” in Harrison M. Wright, The New Imperialism (C. C. Heath, 1976), pp. 5-

43.

Jervis, Robert. 1989. The Logic of Images in International Relations. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University

Press.

Kant, Immanuel. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch in Hans Reiss, ed.. Kant's Political Writings

(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), pp. 93-130.

Lake, David. “Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War,” American Political Science Review 86, no. 1

(March 1992), pp. 24-37.

18

Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, Chs. 7-10 (International Publishers Edition, pp.

68-128).

Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally H. Campbell. “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why

Kant Democracies Fight?” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 35, pp. 187-211.

Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics,” International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3 (Summer,

1988), pp. 427-461.

Ray, James Lee, Donald J. Puchala, and Charles W. Kegley Jr., eds. 1998. Democracy and International

Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition: University of South Carolina Press.

Russett, Bruce and John Oneal, Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International

Organization (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001), chs. 1-2, 5 (skim 3-4)

Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Schultz, Kenneth A. “Do Domestic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional

Perspectives on Democracy and War,” International Organization 52, no. 2 (Spring 1999), pp. 233-66.

Schultz, Kenneth A. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises,” American Political Science

Review 92, no. 4 (December 1998), pp. 829-44.

Smith, Alastair. 1998. International Crises and Domestic Politics. American Political Science Review 92

(3):623-639.

22) Balance of Power, Institutions and Alliances

Deutsch, Karl and J. David Singer, “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability,” World Politics 16:3

(1964): 390-406.

Haas, Ernst B. “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda?,” World Politics, vol. 5 (1953),

pp. 442-477

Hopf, Ted. “Polarity, the Offense-Defense Balance, and War,” American Political Science Review 85:2

(1991): 475-493.

Levy, Ernst B.“Alliance Formation and War Behavior: An Analysis of the Great Powers, 1495-1975,” Journal

of Conflict Resolution, vol. 25 #4 (1981), pp. 581-613.

Mansfield, Edward. Power, Trade and War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 3-33.

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, Chapters 5, 8.

Meunier, Sophie. 2000. What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-US Trade Negotiations.


Niou, Emerson M.S., Peter C. Ordeshook, and Gregory F. Rose. 1989. The Balance of Power: Stability in

International Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Chapter 5.

Walt, Stephen M. 1987. Origins of Alliances Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Chapters 1,2, 5.

23) Cooperation Theory and Collective Action

Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984), Chs. 1-4; pp. 3-87.

Baldwin, David ed. Neoliberalism and Neo-Realism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia

University Press, 1993)

19

Grieco, Joseph. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal

Institutionalism.” International Organization 42 (3):485-507.

Haggard, Stephan “The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade

Agreements Act of 1934,” International Organization, vol. 42, no. 1 (Winter 1988), pp. 121-150.

Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kydd, Andrew. 2000. “Trust, Reassurance and Cooperation.” International Organization 54 (2):325-357.

Lake, David A. “Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered

Monarch with Potential?” International Studies Quarterly 37 (December 1993), pp. 459-489.

Moravcsik, Andrew “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in

the European Community,” International Organization 45:1 (Winter 1991), pp. 19-56.

Niou, Emerson M. S., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1994. "Less Filling, Tastes Great" The Realist-Neo-Liberal

Debate. World Politics 46 (2).

Olson, Mancur, and Richard Zeckhauser. 1966. An Economic Theory of Alliances. The Review of Economics

and Statistics 48 (3):266-279.

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Pahre, Robert. 1999. Leading Questions: How Hegemony affects the International Political Economy. Ann

Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Powell, Robert “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International

Organization 48 (Spring 1994), pp. 313-344.

Sandler, Todd. 1993. The Economic Theory of Alliances: A Survey. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3):446-

483.

Snidal, Duncan. 1991. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Political

Science Review 85 (3):701-726.

24) Institutions and Cooperation

Bernhard, William and David Leblang, “Democratic Institutions and Exchange-Rate Commitments,”

International Organization 53, no. 1 (Winter 1999), pp. 71-97.

Burley Anne-Marie and Walter Mattli, “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,”

International Organization 47 (Winter 1993), pp. 41-76.

Haas, Ernst B. “Technocracy, Pluralism and the New Europe,” in Stephen Graubard, ed. The New Europe

(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964), pp. 62-88.

Haas, Peter M. “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control,”

International Organization 43 (Summer 1989), pp. 377-404.

Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane Robert O, and Celeste A. Wallander, eds. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security

Institutions over Time and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haggard, Stephan and Beth Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41

(Summer, 1987), pp. 491-517.

Hoffmann, Stanley. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe,”

Daedalus 95 (Summer 1966), pp. 892-908.

20

Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after

Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Keohane, Robert O. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no.

4 (December, 1988), 379-396.

Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton

University Press, 1984), Chs. 1, 9 (pp. 1-17, 182-216.)

Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The Rational Design of International

Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761-800.

Krasner, Stephen D. ed., International Regimes (Cornell University Press, 1983), essays by Krasner, Young,

Keohane, Ruggie, Strange and Krasner; pp. 1-21, 93-115, 141-172, 195-232, 337-368.

Kydd, Andrew. 2001. Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement. International

Organization 55 (4):801-828.

Martin, Lisa L. “Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions During the Falklands Islands Conflict,” International

Security, vol. 16 #4 (1992), pp. 143-178.

Martin, Lisa L. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organization 46, no. 4 (Autumn 1992),

pp. 765-92.

Martin, Lisa. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation (Princeton University

Press, 2000), Chs. 2 and 7.

Michael Bailey, Judith Goldstein, and Barry Weingast, “The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy,”

World Politics (1997), pp. 309-38.

Paul Pierson, “The Path to European Union: An Historical Institutionalist Account,” Comparative Political

Studies 29:2 (April 1996), 123-164

Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Helen Milner. 2001. The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions:

Uncertainty and Escape. International Organization 55 (4):829-858.

Young, Oran “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the

Environment,” International Organization 43:3 (Summer 1989), pp. 349-376.

25) Ideas, Identity, Norms and Cooperation

Adler, Emanuel and Michael Barnett, eds., Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1998) Chapters 2, 4.

Beitz, Charles R. “Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics,” International Organization 33

(Summer 1979), pp. 405-424.

Checkel, Jeff.“ The Constructivist Turn in IR Theory,” World Politics 50:2 (1998): 324-348.

Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).

Goldstein, Judith and Robert Keohane, eds, Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political

Change (Cornell University Press, 1993), Chapters 1, 4, 5, 6.

Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation State. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Haas, Peter M. ed. Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination. (Columbia: University of South

Carolina Press, 1992) (Also in International Organization,46:1) Chapters by Haas, Adler, Haas,

Ikenberry, Sebenius and Adler and Haas.

21

Hoffmann, Stanley. The Political Ethics of International Relations (New York: Carnegie Lecture, 1987), 21 pp.

Katzenstein, Peter ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York:

Columbia University Press, 1996).

Luban, David. “Just War and Human Rights,” in Beitz, et. al., International Ethics, pp. 195-216.

McElroy, Richard W. Morality and American Foreign Policy: The Role of Ethics in International Affairs


Sikkink, Kathryn. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International

Organization 47 (Summer 1993), pp. 411-442.

Walzer, Michael. “The Rights of Political Communities,” in Charles R. Beitz, et. al., International Ethics

(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 165-194.

Welch, David. Justice and the Genesis of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).


Chapters 6, 7.

reading list international politics -...

Documents