rcsi mub ebh phe project guidelines 2015 2016
TRANSCRIPT
Evidence based health (EBH) / Public health and epidemiology
(PHE) Project guidelines 2015 - 2016
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain
2
Marks&allocated&to&this&project:&35%&&
Getting&started&• Locate&the&paper&assigned&to&your&team&• Each&team&has&a&number.&• Project&papers&on&Moodle&are&numbered&from&01&to&10&• If&your&team&number&ends&in&a&1,&then&you&have&been&assigned&01,&and&if&it&ends&in&a&2,&then&you&are&assigned&02.&Teams&whose&number&ends&in&a&zero,&as&you&might&expect,&are&assigned&10.&
• Download&the&paper&for&your&team&project&from&Moodle.&&
Writing&and&submitting&your&report&1.&One&person&should&submit&each&project&report&on&behalf&of&the&team.&2.&Please&name&each&document&EBH/PHE&2015&Project&Team&X.doc,&where&X&is&the&number&of&your&team.&3.&Make&sure&to&put&the&team&number&into&the&header&or&footer&of&your&document&too.&4.&Please&give&the&names&and&examination&numbers&of&the&team&members&at&the&start&of&the&project.&This&helps&to&identify&people&who&were&missing&from&class&lists&etc&when&the&original&project&teams&were&selected.&&&
Feedback&&Your&team&report&will&be&peerVreviewed&by&academic&staff&and&you&will&receive&detailed&project&feedback.&&&&
&
& &
3
The&task:&Appraising&a&public&health&research&paper&and&selecting&prevention&strategies&The&idea&is&to&evaluate&a&scientific&paper&in&context&–&both&its&contribution&to&knowledge&and&theðical&context&of&the&research.&&You&will&also&review&other&literature&on&the&topic&and&apply&the&available&evidence&to&select&and&advise&on&appropriate&evidenceVbased&prevention&strategies.&Finally,&you&are&required&to&provide&an&analysis&of&the&teamwork&experience.&This&task&is÷d&into&a&number&of§ions.&The&table&shows&the&structure&of&your&project&report,&the&size&limits&for&each§ion&and&the&marks.&&
Section Words %
1. Scientific evaluation 40% Background to the paper 500
Evaluation of the paper itself 800
What has happened since 700
Evidence-based prevention strategies 1000
2. Ethics 20% Ethical appraisal of the research 1000
Information leaflet and consent form Be brief
3. Search strategy and references No limit 5%
4. Analysis of team work experience 20% Team performance reports 1000
Writing style, structure, presentation 5%
Total 100%
4
Project&aim&&
Research& builds& on& previous& work& and,& in& turn,& contributes& to& the& development& of&knowledge&in&the&field.&The&aim&of&your&project&is&to&show:&&
&
a)& How& this& particular& research& project& arose& by& placing& it& in& the& context& of& what& was&known&and&what&was¬&known&at&the&time,&&
&
b)&To&assess&how&well&the&paper&contributed&to&our&knowledge,&&
&
c)&To& summarise&how&knowledge&and&practice&have&developed&since,& and& to&evaluate& the&contribution&that&the&paper&made&to&this&and&&
&
d)&To&select&and&advise&on&three&evidenceVbased&prevention&strategies&to&reduce&or&prevent&the&health&problem.&
&
Don't& forget& the& external& validity& of& the& paper& –& the& degree& to& which& the& paper& tells& us&something&that&we&can&relate&to&real&life&(or&real&clinical&practice).&There&is&a&whole&lecture&on& external& validity,& but& the& key& points& are& that& research& must& study& an& appropriate&population,&must&measure&things&using&methods&that&make&realVlife&sense&and,&in&the&case&of&interventions,&these&interventions&must&be&realistic&and&practical.&
& &
5
The§ions&1.&Scientific&evaluation&(3000&words&max&in&total)&1.1&Background&to&the&paper&(500&words&max)&In&this§ion,&you&should&summarise&the&knowledge&at&the&time&the&study&was&carried&out,&and&show&how&the&question&that&the&paper&attempted&to&answer&fitted&into&the&development&of&knowledge&in&the&area.&You&will&get&a&head&start&by&reading&the&authors'&introduction,&but&be&warned,&more&marks&will&go&for&a&broader&introduction&to&the&research&question&than&you&will&get&in&the&paper&itself.&
You&should&also&show&the&value&of&the&paper&–&in&what&way&was&it&important&to&answer&the&question&addressed&by&the&paper.&This&is&the&first&criterion&ofðical&research:&that&the&research&has&social&value&–&either&in&terms&of&offering&an&immediate&benefit&to&the&population&being&studied,&or&in&the&longer&term.&
&Sections&These§ions&are&suggestions,&and&may¬&apply&to&all&papers.&
Describe&the&health&problem&that&the&paper&addresses.&Use&available&epidemiological&evidence,&such&as&the&incidence,&prevalence&and&mortality&rates,&to&describe&the&health&problem&including&trends&over&time,&where&possible.&Include&evidence&on&behavioural&and&biological&risk&factors.&Cover&the&basic&medicine,&but&don't&forget&that&a&problem&may&have&important&social,&economic&orðical&importance.&&
Describe&the&state&of&knowledge&at&the&time&the&research&was&designed.&What&was&known,&what&was&unknown,&what&gave&rise&to&the&question&that&the&paper&addresses?&
Describe&the&state&of&practice&at&the&time.&Your&paper&may&have&implications&for&clinical&practice,&or&for&policy&or&some&other&practical&implications;&give&background&on&these.&Evaluate&the&social&value&of&the&research&question.&How&did&the&research&contribute&to&improving&the&wellbeing&of&the&population&being&studied?&Of&the&participants&themselves?&Did&it&hold&out&promise&of&longer&term&benefits?&
What&was&the&potential&social&value&of&the&research?&In&what&way&would&society&be&better&off&by&knowing&the&answer&to&the&research&question?&Don’t&jump&ahead&and&talk&about&the&results&of&the&paper&–&this§ion&should&make&a&case&for&the&importance&of&the&question,¬&the&usefulness&of&the&results.&&
6
Note:&You&will&find&much&of&what&you&need&in&the&paper&itself,&but&reading&around&the&area&will&help&you&to&understand&where&the&research&question&came&from,&and,&of&course,&will&get&you&a&higher&mark.&
&
1.2&Evaluate&the&paper&itself&(800&words&max)&How&well&did&the&paper&answer&the&question&it&set&out&to&address?&&
You&can&use&one&of&the&critical&appraisal&checklists&which&you&will&find&on&the&internet.&The&Moodle&page&gives&links&to&useful&collections&of&checklists.&You&don't&have&to&use&a&checklist,&but&they&are&helpful&because&they&remind&you&of&the&questions&that&your&appraisal&should&cover.&&
Teams&using&one&of&the&Glasgow&checklists&tend&to&perform&well&in&our&experience,&and&we&would&recommend&checking&them&out.&There&are&checklists&for&different&types&of&research.&You&will&find&them&at&
http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/generalpracticeprimarycare/ebp/checklists/&
Your&appraisal&should&include&the&following&information&(not&all&items&may&be&applicable&to&every&paper)&
Participants:&Whom&did&the&researchers&study?&
•&Did&they&select&a&relevant&population&to&study?&
•&Did&their&sampling&method&give&them&a&representative&group&from&the&population?&
•&What&sources&of&bias&were&there&in&recruitment&that&might&limit&the&applicability&of&the&findings?&
•&Did&they&have&a&significant&problem&with&nonVresponse&or&dropVout&that&might&make&the&sample&unrepresentative?&
•&Was&the&sample&big&enough&to&draw&reliable&conclusions?&
Measures:&How&did&the&researchers&measure&the&variables&they&studied?&
•&Were&diagnoses&made&following&recognised&criteria?&
•&Were&the&variables&relevant&to&the&study&question?&
•&Were&the&methods&used&reliable&and&valid?&
•&Were&all&relevant&outcomes&or&factors&measured?&
Results&summarise&the&findings&of&the&paper:&
•&Are&there&unanswered&questions?&
7
•&Could&the&authors&have&answered&these&with&the&data&they&had?&
•&Are&the&results&presented&in&such&a&way&that&you&can&judge&their&clinical&importance?&
Conclusions&summarise&the&authors'&conclusions.&
•&What&are&the&implications&of&the&findings&for&our&knowledge&and&for&practice?&
•&Are&the&authors'&conclusions&justified&by&the&data&they&present?&
Note:&Sometimes&teams&are&so&keen&to&evaluate&the&findings&of&the&paper&that&they&forget&to&tell&us&what&the&findings&were.&Don't&forget!&
Note:&Don't&forget&the&important&topic&of&external&validity&–&the°ree&to&which&the&research&is&applicable&to&realVlife&situations&such&as&clinical&practice&or&public&health.&
&
1.3.&What&has&happened&since?&(700&Words&max)&Summarise&the&development&of&our&knowledge&and&its&impact&on&practice&since&the&publication&of&the&paper.&You&will&find&Google&Scholar&very&useful&here,&as&it&will&link&you&to&papers&which&cited&your&paper.&Check,&too,&on&PubMed's&‘related&articles’&option.&&
A&visit&to&ResearchGate&is&highly&recommended&for&several&reasons.&The&first&is&that&there&are&many&pdfs&on&ResearchGate,&put&up&by&researchers,&which&you&can&download.&You&can&also&ask&researchers&for&private&copies&of&papers.&Also&important,&you&can&ask&questions.&Indeed,&it’s&really&useful&to&see&if&people&have&been&discussing&the&problem&that&your&paper&focusses&on.&This&can&lead&to&understanding&the&main&issues&and&points&of&view,&and,&of&course,&to&useful&web&links.&ResearchGate&is&an&excellent&place&to&put&your&own&questions,&too,&of&course.&You&might&consider&starting&your&own&profile&there.&&
&Don’t&be&too&narrow&Some&teams&only&search&papers&that&cited&their&paper.&You&do¬&have&to&limit&yourself&to&the&papers&that&cited&your&paper!&Your&paper&may¬&have&been&cited&for&various&reasons&–&subsequent&researchers&may¬&have&read&it,&or&may¬&have&thought&it&contributed&anything&important.&
You&should,&rather,&concentrate&on&the&research&question&that&the&paper&set&out&to&answer,&and&find&out&how&much&more&we&know&now.&If&you&are&finding&the&literature&very&small,&you&may&be&thinking&of&the&research&question&in&too&narrow&terms.&For&example,&if&your&paper&is&in&the&area&of&hepatitis&C,&you&might&widen&the&question&to&blood&borne&viruses&or&to&infectious&diseases&groups&at&risk&of&hepatitis&C.&
8
Link&it&to&practice&And&remember&that&research&also&informs&clinical&practice.&Has&the&research&produced&or&changed&any&clinical&guidelines&since&the&paper&was&published?&Have&prevention&or&screening&programmes&been&started,&or&changed?&
As&a&general&rule,&if&you&have&found&less&than&ten&relevant&publications&to&discuss,&you&have&focused&this§ion&too&narrowly,&or&you&havenʼt&been&using&a&good&search&strategy.&
This§ion&is&where&you&can&really&impress.&It's&worth&putting&your&best&minds&to&work&on&it.&
&
1.4&What&can&be&done&about&it?&(1000&words&max)&What&can&be&done&to&prevent&the&health&problem&in&the&population?&The&next&step&is&to&find&suitable&evidenceVbased&interventions&to&prevent&or&reduce&the&health&problem.&What&evidenceVbased&public&health&strategies&could&work&to&reduce&or&prevent&the&health&problem:&&
• Do&possible&interventions&target&the&whole&population?&Do&they&focus&on&those&at&high&risk?&&
• Will&the&strategies&require&changes&to&public&policy&or&the&creation&of&supportive&environments&to&enable&communities&and&individuals&to&increase&control&over&and&to&improve&their&health?&
Prevention&strategies&for&populations&include&primordial,&primary&and/or&secondary&prevention&approaches.&Some&prevention&strategies&may&act&at&the&level&of&the&population,&e.g.&through&policies&and&legislation&to&improve&the&safety&of&water&or&air,&laws&to&ban&cigarette&smoking&in&public&places,&and&legislation&to&tax&fatty&foods&and&soft&drinks&sold&near&schools.&Other&prevention&strategies&act&at&the&level&of&the&individual,&e.g.&immunisations&given&to&infants.&&Health&education&campaigns&limited&to&the&doctor’s&surgery&would¬&be&sufficient&to&constitute&a&public&health&intervention,&unless&efforts&are&made&to&target&all&eligible&infants&in&the&population.&&
• You&need&to&select&three%suitable%population/based%prevention%strategies;&&
• Evaluate&their&advantages%and%disadvantages;&
• Also,&remember&that&important&evidence&on&the&effectiveness&of&a&public&health&intervention&may&have&been&produced&in&a&different&setting&to&the&one&that&presented&in&your&paper.&If&you&include&such&evidence&in&your&review,&you&will&need&to&justify&its&appropriateness%for%your%setting.%%
&
9
Public&health&strategies&are&broadlyVdefined&activities&that&are&evaluated&using&a&wide&variety&of&approaches&and&study&designs,&including&clusterVrandomized&trials.&For&some&questions,&the&best&available&evidence&may&be&from&nonVrandomized&studies,&often&because&trials&are¬&feasible&or¬ðical.&&
There&are&two&sources&of&evidence&that&you&can&use&to&find&research&evidence&of&the&effectiveness&of&many&interventions:&the&Cochrane&library&and&PubMed.&&&
&
2&Ethics&&2.1&Ethical&appraisal&of&the&paper&(1000&words&max)&It&is&unlikely&that&you&will&find&majorðical&problems&with&your&paper.&After&all,ðical&issues&are&likely&to&have&been&spotted&by&theðics&board&that&reviewed&it&and&during&peer&review&before&publication.&The&purpose&of&this§ion&is&to&show&that&you&know&theðical&principles&governing&research,&that&you&can&apply&them&to&a&specific&research&project,&and&say&what&the&duties&of&the&researchers&were&under&each&principle,&and&how&the&researchers&put&these&duties&into&practice&in&carrying&out&the&study.&
Not&all&papers&have&the&sameðical&issues&V&for&example,&if&the&participants&don't&belong&to&a&vulnerable&group,&there&will&be&effectively¬hing&to&discuss.&For&this&reason,&you&should&allocate&space&to&write&about&the&most&interesting&or&importantðical&aspects&of&the&study.&The&headings&below&are&intended&as&guidance&to&make&sure&you&examine&the&keyðical&aspects&of&the&paper.&
You&may&find&that&it&is¬&possible&to&answer&some&of&the&questions&concerning&theðical&conduct&of&the&research&V&authors&are&more&likely&to&leave&out&keyðical&information&than&key&methodological&information.&You&may&consider&emailing&the&corresponding&author&–&this&has&been&known&to&work.&Before&doing&so,&collaborate&with&other&teams&who&have&been&assigned&the&same&paper,&and&make&sure&that&the&author&does¬&receive&requests&for&the&same&information&from&different&teams.&
Headings&to&use&Fair&selection&of&participants&•&Did&the&participants&belong&to&any&vulnerable&group?&If&so,&was&this&the&most&appropriate&group&to&investigate&the&research&question?&Did&this&group&stand&to&benefit&from&the&results?&How&were&their&interests&protected?&
•&Did&the&participants&belong&to&a&group&with&limited&autonomy,&or&a&group&in&which&there&may&be&pressure&to&take&part?&If&so,&was&this&the&most&appropriate&group&to&investigate&the&research&question?&What&steps&were&taken&to&safeguard&participants'&freedom&to&choose&to&take&part?&
10
•&Did&the&participants&belong&to&a&group&with&diminished&ability&to&give&informed&consent?&If&so,&was&this&the&most&appropriate&group&to&investigate&the&research&question?&How&did&the&researchers&obtain&informed&consent?&
&
Minimising&risks,&maximising&benefits&•&What&potential&risks&were&there&for&participants&and&how&were&these&avoided&or&managed?&Did&any&unforeseen&risks&emerge&during&the&study?&
•&Were&there&anyðical&risks&involved&for&the&participants?&
•&What&benefits&did&the&study&stand&to&bring&to&participants&and&how&did&the&researcher&ensure&that&these&benefits&actually&occurred?&
&
Independent&review&•&What&independentðical&evaluation&has&been&carried&out&on&the&study?&
Informed&consent&
•&How&did&the&authors&secure&informed&consent?&
•&If&a&person&decided&to&withdraw&consent,&what&arrangements&were&in&place?&
•&What&fears&might&a&participant&have&had&about¬&participating&or&about&withdrawing?&How&were&these&fears&addressed?&
&Respect&for&participants&•&Was&the&study&anonymous&or&confidential?&In&either&case,&what&steps&were&taken&to&maintain&the&confidentiality/anonymity&of&participant&information?&
•&Could&the&research&have&revealed&important&information&about&the&participant,&such&as&the&presence&of&a&disease&or&disorder?&How&was&this&managed&when&it&occurred?&
•&Did&participants&have&to&disclose&information&which&was&sensitive,&such&as&behaviour&which&went&against&laws&or&professional&codes&of&conduct?&
•&Could&the&research&have&resulted&in&distress&or&discomfort&for&participants?&What&safeguards&and&management&systems&were&in&place&to&minimise&risk&and&to&manage&problems?&
•&Could&the&research&have&uncovered&any&other&issues&which&would&have&placed&anðical&duty&on&the&investigator&to&act,&either&by&informing&someone&or&by&intervening?&
11
Ethics:&summary&•&Summarise&anyðical&weaknesses&you&found&in&the&paper&
•&Summarise&theðical&aspects&of&the&study&that&are¬&described&sufficiently&–&or&at&all&–&in&the&paper.&Are&any&of&these&critical&to&making&a&decision&on&whether&the&research&wasðical&or¬?&
&
2.2.&Information&and&consent&form&(be&brief)&Write&an&information&sheet&describing&the&study&and&asking&for&informed&consent&to&participate.&The&sheet&should&be&written&simply,&and&should&cover&all&aspects&of&informed&consent.&See&guidance¬es&on&Moodle.&
Make&sure&you&write&in&simple,&nonVtechnical&language.&
There&is&no&word&limit,&but&try&to&keep&the&information&sheet&short&–&you&will&lose&marks&for&a&document&that&is&excessively&long&or&detailed.&About&a&page&is&ideal,&but&some&studies&may&be&easier&to&explain&than&others,&so&there's&no&prescribed&size.&
Remember&that&you&need&to&describe&the&research&in&enough&detail&so&that&consent&is&really&informed,&without&swamping&the&participant&with&so&much&information&that&they&cannot&really&decide.&
&
3.&Search&strategy&and&references&(no&limit)&Describe&the&search&strategy&used&to&identify&references&(not&more&than&200&words)&and&insert&the&Reference&List&of&research&papers,&books&or&websites&you&used,&using&Vancouver&reference&format.&You&will&find&complete&details&here:&http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/tutorials/citing/vancouver.html&
&
Note:&Don't&forget&to&list&the&search&engines&you&used,&the&terms&you&used,&and&mention&any&clever&use&you&made&of&facilities&like&PubMed's&related&articles&search.&You&get&more&marks&for&a&thorough,&well&described&strategy,&so&don't&undersell&yourselves&here.&Note:&Don't&forget&to&reference&articles&you&used&in&your&Ethics&review!&Note:&Your&bibliography&should&be&laid&out&in&Vancouver&format.&You&can&do&this&by&using&the&insert&footnote&command&in&Word,&and&using&the&dialogue&to&change&the&entry&to&an&endnote.&Once&you&do&this&once,&all&subsequent&entries&will&be&endnotes.&This&will&allow&you&to&build&up&a&numbered&reference&list.&
12
4.& Team&performance&(1000&words&max)&&
1. Provide&a&list&and&attendance&record&[date,&time,&specific&task&for&meeting&attendance&and&the&tasks&assigned&to&each&team&member.&As&a&general&guide,&6V8&meetings&should&suffice&for&project&teamwork.&&
&
2. Complete&an&analysis&of&the&team&role&balance&using&Belbin&roles.&This&will&offer&direct&individual&feedback&and&will&support&you&in&the&analysis&of&team&strengths&and&weaknesses&and&in&developing&a&tailored&plan&to&compensate&for&any&team&weaknesses.&
&
3. Complete&an&analysis&of&team&performance&describing&how&you&worked&together&as&a&team.&&Focus&on&four&main&areas:&preparation,&contribution,&respect&for&others’&ideas,&and&flexibility.&
&
4. Outline&five&strategies,&on&the&basis&of&this&team&project&experience,&for&improving&the&functioning&of&any&new&team&project&you&may&undertake&in&the&future.&
&
• Preparation – Were all team members prepared when they came to class? Did they complete tasks they were assigned to? How did the team deal with poorly prepared team members?
• Contribution – Did team members contribute productively to group discussion and work? Were discussions mostly at deep (rather than superficial) conceptual levels? Were team members recognised when something they said helped the team to reach a good decision?
• Respect for others’ ideas – Did team members encourage others to contribute their ideas? Did team members share and receive criticism without making it personal? Did team members worked to come up with solutions that satisfied all members?
• Flexibility&–&Were&team&members&flexible&when&disagreements&occurred?&
&
& &
13
Submissions&and&Deadlines:&Submission&team&report&1:&&&Download&the&form&from&the&‘download&and&upload§ion’&of&the&PIH&project&on&moodle.&
Submission&Team&Report&1&Word&document&&
&
Submission&team&report&2:&&&Download&the&form&from&the&‘download&and&upload§ion’&of&the&PIH&project&on&moodle.&
Submission&Team&Report&2&Word&document&&
&
Submission&team&report&3:&&&Download&the&form&from&the&‘download&and&upload§ion’&of&the&PIH&project&on&moodle.&
Submission&Team&Report&3&Word&document&&
&
Submission&completed&project&report:&&&For&the&final&report&the&leader&of&the&group&should&submit&one&document&in&a&pdf&format.&
&
&
&
14
.