rapid environmental impact assessmentgpcb.gov.in/pdf/t_j_agro_navsari_eia_part_1.pdf · rapid...
TRANSCRIPT
RRaappiidd EENNVViiRROONNMMEENNTTaaLL
iiMMppaaCCTT aSSESSMENT
RREEppOORRTT OONN
PPRROOPPOOSSEEDD FFEERRTTIILLIIZZEERR MMAANNUUFFAACCTTUURRIINNGG
UUNNIITT
FFOORR:: MM//ss.. TT.. JJ.. AAGGRROO FFEERRTTIILLIIZZEERRSS PPVVTT.. LLTTDD.. ((NNAAVVSSAARRII))
Prepared by M/s. ENVIROCARE ENGINEERS & CONSULTANT 201, New Opera House, Nr. Gurudev Petrol pump & Harish Dyeing,
Khatodara, Surat –395 002.
E –mail: [email protected]
Tele: (0261) 2630781 Telefax: (0261) 2630782
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
SR. NO.
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE STATUS REFERENCE/EXPLANATION
1 Project site specific details such as distance of the project site from the nearest (1) village (2) Water Body: Creek / Nallah / Lake / Pond / Reservoir / Canal (3) National Highway (4) State Highway (5) Railway line (6) Heritage site (7) National Park / Wild Life Sanctuary / Reserve Forest shall be included in the rapid EIA report to be prepared covering one season (other than monsoon) data.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No 1, Table No 1.1, Page No: 1-2
2 Need for the proposed expansion plant shall be justified in detail.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No 11, Para 3, Page No: 11-1
3 Present land use pattern of the study area based on satellite imagery.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Point 3.10, Page No: 3-62
4 Demarcation of proposed expansion activities in lay out of the existing premises.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:1 , Figure No 1.1, Page No: 1-4
5 Provision of separate entry, exit and adequate margin all round the periphery for easy unobstructed movement of fire tender without reversing. Mark the same in the plant layout.
Complied Included in EIA report For separate entry & exist detail: Please Refer Chapter No: 8, Point No: 8.8.10, Page No: 8-18. For Layout: Please Refer Chapter No:1 , Figure No 1.1, Page No: 1-4
6 Detailed manufacturing process along with chemical reactions.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 2 Point No: 2.4, Page No: 2-14. As production of NPK is a formulation based process in which no chemical reaction take place only proportionate mixing will be done.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
7 Copy of permission obtained from Central Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water. Detailed study of hydrology of the area. Quality of ground water at site and impacts of ground water withdrawal on hydrology and ground water quality.
Not Applicable As per central Ground Water Board (CWGB) website our project location doesn’t fall under their critical or dark zone area. Thus we don’t require permission for the same. The quality of ground water is summarized in Chapter No. 3, Table No. 3.9(A) Page No: 3-47 to 3-48.
For Impact on ground water: Please Refer Chapter No: 4, Point 4.3.3, Page No: 4-11.
8 Detailed mass balance and water balance (including reuse-recycle, if any) alongwith qualitative and quantitative analysis of the each waste stream to be generated from all sources.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:2, Point No. 2.5, Page No: 2-24 & 2-25 The industry will not produce any industrial waste water thus quality analysis of the wastewater cannot be done.
9 Specific measures proposed to conserve water and plants for the future in this regard.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Point No: 8.3,Page No: 8-3
10 Explore the possibility of reuse / recycle and other cleaner production options to be adopted for reduction of wastes.
Complied Included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5, Point No: 5.4, Page No: 5-2
11 One season site-specific meteorological data including temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall shall be provided.
Complied Included in EIA report For Temp., Humidity& Wind speed data: Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Point No: 3.5, Page No: 3-5 to 3-7. For rainfall data: Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Point No: 3.4.3, Page No: 3-3.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
12 One complete season AAQ data (except monsoon) to be given along with the dates of monitoring. The parameters to be covered shall including PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx
, and HF. The location of the monitoring stations should be so decided so as to take into consideration the pre-dominant downwind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests. There should be at least one monitoring station in the upwind direction. There should be at least one monitoring station in the pre dominant downwind direction at a location where maximum ground level concentration is likely to occur.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Point No: 3.6, Page No: 3-8 to 3-14.
13 Impact of the project on the AAQ of the area. Details of the model used and the input the parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation, and sensitive receptors, if any. The wind roses should also be shown on this map.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:3 Point 3.6.7, Page No: 3-23 to 3-43.
14 Type, quantity and source of fuel to be used. Undertaking stating that they shall not use wood as a fuel in the Hot Air Generator.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Table No: 3.6A, Page No: 3-15 Undertaking Attached Annexure: 1
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
15 Specific details of (i) Process emission from each unit process with its quantification, (ii) Air pollution control measures proposed (iii) Adequacy of the air pollution control measures to achieve the GPCB Norms (iv) Details of the utilities required (v) Flue gas emission rate emission from the utilities along with stack height. (v) Air Pollution Control Measures proposed to the utilities along with its adequacy (vi) Sources of fugitive emission from the unit along with its quantification and proposed measures to control it.
Complied included in EIA report For details of 1. Process emission, propose
APCM and its adequacy, flue gas emission rate &its Source ( i , ii, iii, v, vi & vii): Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Table No. 3.6 A &B Page No: 3-15 to 3-16
2. List of utility: Please Refer Chapter No: 2, Table No. 2.2B Page No: 2-4.
16 Details of measures proposed for the online monitoring of the pollutants from the process stack and its monitoring plan.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5, Point No: 5.1 & 5.2, Page No: 5-1
17 Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as on road network due to transportation of fuel, ash etc. Whether any additional infrastructure would need to be constructed and the agency responsible for the same with time frame.
Complied The existing unit has enough facilities for the proposed expansion. No additional construction required. No construction or alternation required to be done on local infrastructure.
18 Details of flora and fauna duly authenticated should be provided. In case of any scheduled fauna, conservation plan should be provided.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 3, Table No: 3.17& 3.18, Page No: 3-68 to 3-71.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
19 Details of management of the hazardous waste to be generated from the project stating detail of storage area for each type of waste, its handling, its utilization and disposal etc. How the manual handling of the hazardous wastes will be minimized.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5, Table No: 5.1 A&B, Page No: 5-3 to 5-4.
20 Name and address of end consumers to which Fluorosilisilic Acid will be sold. Copies of agreement / MoU / acceptance letter obtained from them showing their willingness for accepting Fluorosilisilic Acid.
Complied For Agreement please refer Annexure 2.
21 Methodology of de-contamination and disposal of discarded containers and its record keeping.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5, Point No: 5.4.2, Page No: 5-5
22 Details of measures proposed for the noise pollution abatement and its monitoring.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5, Point No: 5.2, Page No: 5-1
23 Detailed five year greenbelt development program including annual budget, types & number of trees to be planted, area under green belt development [with map], budgetary outlay; along with commitment of the management to carry out the tree plantation activities outside the premises at appropriate place in the nearby areas and elsewhere.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 7 For No of Tree: Please Refer Table No: 7.1, Page No: 7-2. For Expenditure: Please Refer Point No: 7.2, Page No; 7-3.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
24 A detailed EMP including the protection and mitigation measures for impact on human health and environment as well as detailed monitoring plan and environmental management cell proposed for implementation and monitoring of EMP. The EMP should also include the concept of waste-minimisation, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, energy conservation, and natural resource conservation. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum earmarked for environment pollution control measures.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 5 Page No: 5-1 (Environmental Monitoring Schedule) Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Page No:8-2
25 An action plan showing list of socio-economic upliftment activities based on socio-economic profile of the surrounding villages and need base field assessment along with the fund allocation for the five years, shall be incorporated in the EMP.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 7 Page No: 7-3
26 Details of hazardous characteristics and toxicity of raw materials and products to be handled and the control measures proposed to ensure safety and avoid the human health impacts. This shall include the details of Antidotes also.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 6 Point No. 6.7 Page No: 6-9 For MSDS Please Refer Chapter No: 6 Point No. 6.10 Page No: 6-14
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
27 Details of quantity of each hazardous chemical to be stored, Material of Construction of major hazardous chemical storage tanks, threshold storage quantity as per schedules of the manufacture, Storage & Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules of major hazardous chemicals. Revised details of capacity and numbers of hazardous chemicals storage tanks, so that storage of hazardous chemicals should be in multiple small capacity tanks / containers instead of one single large capacity tank for safety purpose. How manual handling of the hazardous chemicals will be minimized?
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:2, Table No: 2.6, Page No: 2-10 to 2-11.
28 Occupational health impact on the workers and mitigation measures proposed to avoid the human health hazards along with the personal protective equipment to be provided to the workers. Plan for periodic medical check up of the workers exposed.
Complied included in EIA report For occupational health checkup & its periodic plan: Please Refer Chapter No: 6 Point No. 6.8 & 6.9 Page No: 6-11 to 6-14
29 Measures proposed to be taken for the work zone ambient air quality monitoring as per Gujarat Factories Rules. Details of equipments / instruments to be deployed to measure record and analyze workplace exposure.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:5 Page No: 5-1 Yearly Monitoring contract given to the environmental consultant for the monitoring of all the parameters as per the time framed mention in Environmental Monitoring Program Schedule.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
30 Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible accident scenario related to fire and explosion issues due to storage and use of fuel should be carried out. The worst-case scenario should take into account the maximum inventory of storage at site at any point in time. The risk contours should be plotted on the plant layout map clearly showing which of the activities would be affected in case of an accident taking place. Based on the same, proposed safeguard measures including emergency management plan should be provided.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 6 Page No: 6-1
31 Submit checklist in the form of Do’s & Don’ts of preventive maintenance, strengthening of HSE, manufacturing utility staff for safety related measures.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Point No: 8.24 Table No: 8.8 Page No: 8-59. For strengthening of HSE Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Point No: 8.2 & For Utility staff refer Table No: 8.1.Page No: 8-2.
32 A tabular chart for the issue raised and address during public hearing/consultation and commitment of the project proponent on the same should be provided. An action plan to address the issues rose during public hearing and the necessary allocation of funds for the same should be provided.
Suitable Date Awaited Action will be taken after public hearing.
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
33 Details of scheme for surface as well as roof top rain water harvesting and ground water recharge revealing that quantity of ground water extraction would be compensated by equivalent of more quantity of rain water recharged, with proper scientific calculations considering rainfall in the region, catchment area, land / soil characteristics, ground water recharged rate, duration of rain water harvesting etc. Details of provisions of pre-treatment of the rainwater in the case of surface run off are to be harvested. Location of recharged percolation well on the layout plan.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Point No. 8.3.1 Page No: 8-3
34 Plan for compliance of the CREP guidelines for the proposed plant.
Complied All applicable points included in the EIA report. Compliance report of the CREP guidelines attached as per Annexure 3
35 Compliance status of the existing unit with respect to various conditions given in the CC&A & CTE of Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB).
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No:8 Page No: 8-56
Compliance of the Term of Reference (TOR)
36 Records of any legal breach of Environmental laws i.e. details of show- cause notices, closure notices, closure order etc. served by the GPCB to the existing unit in last three years and actions taken then after for prevention of pollution.
Complied Please Refer Chapter No:8 Page No: 8-59 No legal breach of environmental laws till date observed.
37 Details of fatal / Non-fatal accidents, loss of life or man hours, if any, occurred in the existing unit in last three years and measures proposed to be taken for avoiding reoccurrence of such accidents in future.
Complied included in EIA report Please Refer Chapter No: 8 Page No: 8-59. Since no accidents are recorded for which measures can be proposed for avoiding its reoccurrence.
38 Any litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by any Court of Law against the company, if so, details thereof
Complied As per the knowledge of the authorized persons there are no pending litigations against the project /company.
LIST OF CHAPTERS
Sr. No. Title Page No.
TOR & Its Compliance
Chapter 1:- Introduction
1.1 Introduction 1-1
1.2 Basic Information 1-1
1.3 Distance of Nearest Key Infrastructure / Features from Project Site 1-2
1.4 Scope of EIA 1-3
1.5 Methodology of EIA 1-3
1.6 Air Environment 1-5
1.7 Noise Environment 1-5
1.8 Water Environment 1-5
1.9 Land Environment 1-5
1.10 Biological Environment 1-6
1.11 Socio- Economic Environment 1-6
1.12 The EIA Process 1-6
1.13 Statutory Requirement of EIA 1-7
1.14 Structure of the EIA Report 1-7
Chapter 2:- Project Description
2.1 Background 2-1
2.2 Land Distribution at Site 2-1
2.3 Main Phases of the Project 2-5
2.4 Manufacturing Process, Chemical Reaction & Mass Balance 2-14
2.5 Water Balance 2-24
2.6 Sources of Energy 2-26
Chapter 3:- Description of the Environment
3.1 Baseline Environmental Status 3-1
3.2 Establishment of Impact Zone 3-2
3.3 Meteorology 3-2
3.4 Micro-Meteorology of the Area 3-2
3.5 Site Specific Meteorological Data 3-5
3.6 Air Environment 3-8
3.7 Water Environment 3-44
3.8 Ambient Noise Monitoring 3-51
3.9 Soil Quality Monitoring 3-55
3.10 Land Use Pattern 3-62
3.11 Geological Structure 3-64
3.12 Hydrology 3-65
3.13 Physiography 3-65
3.14 Forest Boundaries 3-66
LIST OF CHAPTERS
3.15 Flora 3-68
3.16 Fauna 3-70
3.17 Demographic & Socio Economic Profile 3-72
3.18 Public Amenities 3-80
Chapter 4:- Anticipated Environmental Impact & Mitigation Measures
4.1 Introduction 4-1
4.2 Impact Assessment Matrix 4-1
4.3 Overall Impacts 4-10
4.4 Mitigation Measures 4-14
Chapter 5:- Environmental Monitoring Program
5.1 Details of Measures Proposed for the Online Monitoring & Its
Monitoring Plan 5-1
5.2 Details of Provisions for the Work Area Air Quality Monitoring 5-1
5.3 Waste Water Management 5-1
5.4 Solid Waste Management 5-2
5.5 Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Program 5-6
Chapter 6:- Additional Studies
6.1 Introduction & Objectives 6-1
6.2 Hazardous Identification 6-2
6.3 Quantities Of Hazardous/Toxic Materials 6-4
6.4 Hazards Due To Leakage 6-5
6.5 Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios 6-6
6.6 Individual Risk Analysis 6-6
6.7 Details of Hazardous Characteristic & Toxicity of Raw Materials &
Products 6-9
6.8 Details of Possibilities of Occupational Health Hazards 6-11
Chapter 7:- Project Benefits
7.1 Green Belt Development 7-1
7.2 Expenditure on Green Belt Development 7-3
7.3 Socio-Economic Benefits 7-3
Chapter 8:- Environmental Management Plan
8.1 Environmental Management Plan 8-1
8.2 Environmental Management Cell 8-2
8.3 Water Conservation 8-3
8.4 Waste Management 8-5
8.5 Expenditure on Environmental Matters 8-5
LIST OF CHAPTERS
8.6 Disaster Management Plan 8-6
8.7 Implementation 8-11
8.8 Emergency Structure & Responsibility 8-11
8.9 Awareness, Training & Competence 8-20
8.10 Communication 8-21
8.11 Emergency Documentation & Document Control 8-26
8.12 Checking & Corrective Action 8-31
8.13 Recommendations 8-35
8.14 Unloading of Tank Trucks 8-36
8.15 Hazardous Waste Transport 8-37
8.16 General Safety Practices 8-38
8.17 Personnel Safety 8-42
8.18 Safety of Plant Equipment 8-44
8.19 Reactors 8-45
8.20 Equipment Safety 8-46
8.21 Emergency Management 8-54
8.22 Emergency Response 8-56
8.23 Details of the Separate Isolated Storage Areas 8-58
8.24 Checklist in Form of Do’s & Don’ts 8-59
8.25 Compliance status of the Existing Unit with Respect to Conditions In
Consent of G.P.C.B 8-60
8.26 Details of Past Occurred Fatal/Non Fatal Accidents 8-68
8.27 Details of Any Legal Breach of Environmental Laws 8-68
Chapter 9:- Alternatives (Technology & Site)
9.1 Alternatives 9-1
Chapter 10:- Environmental Cost Benefit
10.1 Environmental Cost Benefits 10-1
Chapter 11:- Summary & Conclusion
11.1 Introduction & Project Justification 11-1
11.2 Purpose of Study 11-1
11.3 Extent of Study & Area Covered 11-2
11.4 Method of Study 11-2
11.5 Project Details 11-2
11.6 Environmental Setting 11-4
11.7 Fuel/ Energy Requirement 11-5
11.8 Water Requirement 11-5
11.9 Baseline Environment 11-6
11.10 Environmental Impact & Mitigation Measures 11-6
11.11 Environmental Monitoring Program 11-7
11.12 Ambient Air 11-8
LIST OF CHAPTERS
11.13 Water Resources 11-10
11.14 Noise Levels 11-10
11.15 Soil/Land Quality 11-10
11.16 Environmental Management Plan 11-10
11.17 Solid & Hazardous Waste Management 11-11
11.18 Green Belt Development 11-12
11.19 Monitoring Schedule 11-12
11.20 Expenditure for Environmental Activities 11-12
11.21 Conclusion 11-12
Chapter 12:- Disclosure of Consultant Engaged
12.1 Consultant Engaged 12-1
12.2 Brief Profile of Consultant 12-1
12.3 Scope of Work 12-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table No Title Page No.
Chapter 1:- Introduction
1.1 Nearest Key Infrastructure/ Feature from Project Site 1-2
Chapter 2:- Project Description
2.1 Land Distribution at Site 2-2
2.2 List of Equipment & Machinery 2-4
2.3 Physico-Chemical Properties of Raw Material 2-6
2.4 Physico-Chemical Properties of Product 2-7
2.5 Means of Transportation of Raw Material & Product 2-8
2.6 Storage Details of Raw Material & Product 2-10
2.7 A The List of Raw Material Product wise 2-12
2.7 B List of Product 2-13
Chapter 3:- Description of the Environment
3.1 Predominant Wind Direction 3-4
3.2 Mean Meteorological Data During Study Period 3-6
3.3 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Location 3-9
3.4A Ambient Air Quality Status 3-11
3.4B Cumulative Percentile of PM10 3-12
3.4C Cumulative Percentile of PM2.5 3-12
3.4D Cumulative Percentile of SO2 3-13
3.4E Cumulative Percentile of NOx 3-13
3.4F Cumulative Percentile of HF 3-14
3.5 Technique Used for AAQM 3-14
3.6A Proposed Details of Stack, APCS & Its Emission Estimate 3-15
3.6B Proposed Details of Process Vent, APCS & Its Emission Estimate 3-16
3.7A Result for Fugitive Gas 3-24
3.7B Result for HF Gas 3-28
3.7C Result for NOx Gas 3-32
3.7D Result for SO2 Gas 3-36
3.7E Result for PM 3-40
3.8 Details of Water Monitoring Locations 3-45
3.9A Ground Water Quality 3-47
3.9B Surface Water Quality 3-49
3.9C Limits For Surface Water 3-50
3.10 Details of Noise Monitoring Locations 3-52
3.11 Noise Level Data 3-54
3.12 Details of Soil Monitoring Locations 3-55
3.13 Soil Classification 3-57
3.14 Physico Chemical Characteristic of Soil 3-59
3.15 Areas Under Different Landuse 3-62
LIST OF TABLES
3.16 Area Statistic of Forest Map 3-67
3.17 Flora Found in Savli Area 3-68
3.18 Fauna Found in Savli Area 3-70
3.19 Demographic Data 3-73
3.20 Population Density 3-74
3.21 Literacy Rate 3-76
3.22 Occupational Structure 3-78
3.23 Details of Amenities Available in Study Area 3-81
Chapter 4:- Anticipated Environmental Impact & Mitigation Measures
4.1 Impact Identification Matrix 4-2
4.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 4-4
4.3 Mitigation Measures 4-15
Chapter 5:- Environmental Monitoring Program
5.1A Total Solid Waste Generation 5-3
5.1B Details of Hazardous Waste Management 5-4
5.2 Environmental Monitoring Plan 5-6
Chapter 6:- Additional Studies
6.1 Facilities for Storage of Chemicals 6-5
6.2 Vulnerability Analysis 6-8
6.3 Details of Hazardous & Toxicity of Raw Materials & Products 6-9
6.4 Details of Occupational Health Hazards 6-11
Chapter 7:- Project Benefits
7.1 Types & Number of Trees to be Planted 7-2
Chapter 8:- Environmental Management Plan
8.1 Environmental Management Cell 8-2
8.2 Detail of Rain Water Harvesting Pits 8-3
8.3 Details of Maximum Strom Water Generated 8-3
8.4 Expenditure on Environmental Matters 8-5
8.5 Applicable EHS regulatory Requirement 8-8
8.6 Type of Fire Accidents & Medium of Extinguisher 8-18
8.7 Composition of Offsite Crisis Group 8-30
8.8 Checklist in Form of Do’s & Don’ts 8-59
8.9 Compliance status of the Existing Unit with Respect to Conditions In
CTE of G.P.C.B 8-60
8.10 Compliance status of the Existing Unit with Respect to Conditions In
Consent of G.P.C.B 8-64
Chapter 11:- Summary & Conclusion
11.1 Proposed Product List 11-2
LIST OF TABLES
11.2 Proposed Raw Material List 11-3
11.3A Total Water Requirement For The Project 11-5
11.3B Total Waste Water Generation For The Project 11-6
11.4 Environmental Monitoring Program 11-7
11.5A Proposed Detail of Stack, APCS & Its Emission Estimate 11-8
11.5B Proposed Emission Rate 11-8
11.5C Proposed Detail of Process Vent, APCS & Its Emission Estimate 11-9
11.5D Proposed Emission Rate for Process Vent 11-9
11.6 Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Requirement 11-11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No Title Page No.
Chapter 1:- Introduction
1.1 Site Layout Plan 1-4
Chapter 2:- Project Description
2.1 Water Balance Diagram 2-25
Chapter 3:- Description of the Environment
3.1 Wind Rose Diagram 3-7
3.2 Location of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 3-10
3.3 Scrubber Details 3-20
3.4A Guassian Plume Model For Fugitive Gas 3-26
3.4B Air Quality Contour For Fugitive Gas 3-27
3.5A Guassian Plume Model For HF Gas 3-30
3.5B Air Quality Contour For HF Gas 3-31
3.6A Guassian Plume Model For NOx Gas 3-34
3.6B Air Quality Contour For NOx Gas 3-35
3.7A Guassian Plume Model For SO2 Gas 3-38
3.7B Air Quality Contour For SO2 Gas 3-39
3.8A Guassian Plume Model For PM 3-42
3.8B Air Quality Contour For PM 3-43
3.9 Location of Water Sampling Station 3-46
3.10 Location of Noise Monitoring Station 3-53
3.11 Location of Soil Sampling Station 3-56
3.12 Land Use Pattern Within Study Area 3-63
3.13 Geology of Gujarat 3-64
3.14 Ground Water Level of Gujarat State 3-65
3.15 Male & Female Within Study Area 3-74
3.16 Population Density & Sex Ratio 3-75
3.17 Literacy Rate 3-77
3.18 Workers Categorization 3-79
Chapter 8:- Environmental Management Plan
8.1 Rain Water Harvesting Pit 8-4
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure No Title
Abbreviations
1. Undertaking
2. MoU/Agreement for accepting Fluorosilisilic Acid
3. Compliance of CREP Guidelines
4. Compliance of TOR Guidelines
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011____
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-1]
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Unit is located at S. No. 378/379, N.H. No. 8, P.O. Khadsupa Boarding, Opp. Jain Panjrapore,
Tal & Dist. Navsari of Gujarat State. M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. is situated at Astgam,
Navsari in southern region of Gujarat. The unit is about 9.13 km from Navsari.
Unit has started production of NPK fertilizer at Navsari in 1996 and in 2003 it has started
production of Single Super phosphate fertilizer.
Due to increased demand of the existing products, the unit has decided to expand their existing
manufacturing by increasing their product capacities. Unit has valid CC&A for the existing
products & apply to get NOC from GPCB for expansion of existing products.
Since the unit has enough space & equipments for the additional raw materials & product
storage as well as to ensure quick & timely delivery of Fertilizers to farmers at various
locations, the company has selected this site. The company has positive approach towards
clean environment and energy conservation apart from industrial growth.
1.2 BASIC INFORMATION
1. Name of the Unit : M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd.
2. Location of the project : S. No. 378/379, N.H. No. 8,
P.O. Khadsupa Boarding, Opp. Jain Panjrapore,
Tal & Dist. Navsari (Gujarat)
Pincode: 396 433
3. Nearest Airport : Surat Domestic Airport,
Approximate Distance: 36.30 Km
4. Nearest Railway Station : Navsari Railway Station
Approximate Distance: 11.45 Km
5. Area of the Project : 10,000 m2
6. Expected Cost of the Project : 90 Lacs Existing
10 Lacs for Proposed Expansion
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-2]
1.3 DISTANCE OF NEAREST KEY INFRASTRUCTURE FEATURES FROM
PROJECT SITE
The distance of nearest infrastructure features are presented in Table 1.1 below
TABLE – 1.1 NEAREST KEY INFRASTRUCTURE FEATURE FROM PROJECT
SITE
Sr.
No. Nearest Infrastructure Feature Distance from Project Site
1. Navsari Town 9.13 Km in North-West Direction
2. Navsari Railway station 11.41 Km in North-West Direction
3. Purna River 6.88 Km in North Direction
4. Ambika River 5.00 Km in South Direction
5. Navsari Civil Hospital 11.0 Km in North- West Direction
6. Bhavanimata Temple 8.9 Km in South Direction
7. Satya Sai Viddyalaya 5.5 Km in North- West Direction
8. National Highway 8 71.03 Meter in South Direction
9. Waghai National Park 47.13 Km in North- East Direction
10. Jambughoda Wildlife Sanctuary 173.16 Km in North-East Direction
11. Dandi eco-sensitive zone 23.25 Km in West Direction
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-3]
1.4 SCOPE OF EIA
The scope of the study includes detailed characterization of the status of environment in an
area of 10 km radius around M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. for identifying environmental
components, viz. air, noise, and water, land, biological and socio-economic. Under the scope of
EIA, it is envisaged
To assess the present status of air, noise, water, land, biological and socio-economic
components of environment
To identify and quantify significant impacts of various operations on environmental
components
To evaluate existing and proposed pollution control measures
To prepare Environmental Management Plan (EMP) outlining additional control
technologies to be adopted for mitigation of adverse impacts
To evaluate existing Environmental Quality Monitoring Programme and suggest
strengthening of existing monitoring Programme keeping in view pollution potential
of the proposed project.
1.5 METHODOLOGY OF EIA
Keeping in view the nature of activities envisaged, size of the existing industries in the region
and various environmental guidelines available, it was decided to cover an area of 10 km
radius from the center of the M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. for the purpose of
environmental impact assessment studies.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-4]
The general plot plan for the plant area is shown in Figure 1.1.
FIGURE: 1.1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-5]
1.6 AIR ENVIRONMENT
Ambient air quality status with respect to parameters like Particulate Matter having size less
then 10µg (PM10), Particulate Matter having size less then 2.5µg (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide
(SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) and Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) has been established. PM10,
PM2.5 SO2, NOx, and HF were monitored on 24 hourly average bases. Gaussian dispersion
model was developed and used to predict likely changes in ambient air quality due to proposed
project expansion. The data on meteorological and microclimatic parameters collected at
project site during winter season was used for mathematical modeling. The prediction exercise
was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, and HF. Based on the results of the prediction
exercise mitigation measures are suggested.
1.7 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
Noise levels were measured in the premises of M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. and several
locations in the human settlements around the plant at different times of the day using precision
noise level meter. Noise levels are predicted using empirical mathematical equations to
estimate probable increase in noise levels due to proposed project expansion.
1.8 WATER ENVIRONMENT
Information on water resources (Ground/Surface) was collected. Parameters of prime
importance were selected under physical, chemical inorganic, chemical organic, nutrient and
heavy metal categories to describe baseline environmental status. Samples were collected at
selected locations in and around the plant to determine the surface and ground water quality.
Water requirement for various units was also estimated.
1.9 LAND ENVIRONMENT
Surface soil samples from the plough layer depth (15-20 cms) were collected for determination
of the physico-chemical properties of the soils. The baseline data was used in assessing the
impacts of the project on land environment.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-6]
1.10 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Study of vegetation was carried out within 10 km radius around M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt.
Ltd. site. Observations were made at different sampling points and qualitative as well as
quantitative analysis of the vegetation was carried out. Presence of various types of animal
species was recorded. Field observations were used for calculating indices. Information related
to social forestry, tree plantation programmes, indigenous fauna, endangered animals was also
collected. For assessing the biological and bacteriological quality, observations were made
with the help of bacteriological, phytoplankton, zooplankton counts and different indices were
calculated. Species of fishes available in the study area were also recorded.
1.11 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Existing baseline status of the socio-economic profile of the study area with reference to
demographic structure, provision of basic amenities, health status incorporating morbidity
pattern, economy, social welfare programmes in the nearby rural areas as well as infrastructural
facilities to the employees being implemented by the M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd.
management was studied. A socio-economic survey in villages located within 10 km radius
study area was also undertaken to study the people's perceptions about the proposed plant
operations as well as their opinion and aspirations about the proposed project activity.
1.12 THE EIA PROCESS
The EIA process comprises of the following phases:
o Screening
o Scoping and consideration of alternatives
o Baseline data collection
o Impact prediction
o Assessment of alternatives, delineation of mitigation measures and environmental impact
statement
o Public hearing
o Environment Management Plan
o Decision making
o Monitoring the clearance conditions
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
[1-7]
1.13 STATUTORY REQUIREMENT OF EIA
Every anthropogenic activity has some impact on the environment. More often it is harmful to
the environment than benign. However, mankind as it is developed today cannot live without
taking up these activities for his food, security and other needs. Consequently, there is a need
to harmonize developmental activities with the environmental concerns. Environmental impact
assessment (EIA) is one of the tools available with the planners to achieve the above-
mentioned goal.
The objective of EIA is to foresee the potential environmental problems that would arise out of
a proposed development and address them in the project's planning and design stage. The EIA
process should then allow for the communication of this information to:
o The project proponent;
o The regulatory agencies; and,
o All stakeholders and interested groups.
EIA integrates the environmental concerns in the developmental activities right at the time of
initiating for preparing the feasibility report. In doing so, it can facilitate the integration of
environmental concerns and mitigation measures in project development. EIA can often
prevent future liabilities or expensive alterations in project design.
1.14 STRUCTURE OF THE EIA REPORT
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Project Description
Chapter 3: Description of the Environment
Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impact & Mitigation Measures.
Chapter 5: Environmental Monitoring Program
Chapter 6: Additional Studies
Chapter 7: Project Benefits
Chapter 8: Environmental Management Plan
Chapter 9: Analysis of Alternatives (Technology & Site)
Chapter 10: Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis
Chapter 11: Summary & Conclusion
Chapter 12: Disclosure of Consultants engaged
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-1]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES
2.1 BACKGROUND
At present the unit is producing NPK Granulated Mix Fertilizers, Single Super Phosphate
Powder, Single Super Phosphate Granulated & Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product).
To expand business strength in middle of Gujarat, unit intends to enhance the production of
existing products. Unit has valid CC&A for the existing products & apply to get NOC from
GPCB for expansion of existing products.
2.2 LAND DISTRIBUTION AT SITE
Land:
The unit is located at S. No. 378/379, N.H. No. 8, P.O. Khadsupa Boarding, Opp. Jain
Panjrapore, Tal & Dist. Navsari of Gujarat State. No additional land will be required for
proposed expansion. Expansion will be done in existing premises only. Area breakup provided
in Table No. 2.1.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-2]
TABLE 2.1 LAND DISTRIBUTIONS AT SITE
ROOM
NO. NAME OF SECTION
AREA
(M2)
SEC AREA
(M2)
(A) Raw Material Section
R.M. Store (Under test /APPD) 1189.5 53 X 12 (PSSP/ GSSP)
27 X 12 (N.P.K)
27 X 8.5 (N.P.K) R.M. Rejected --
(B) Packing Material Section
P.M. Store 250 25 X 10
(C ) Finished Good Section
Quarantine 1012 44 X 23 (PSSP curing)
46 X 14 (PSSP / GSSP)
41 X 12.5 (N.P.K)
10 X 10
F. G. Store 1156.5
F. G. Recall 100
(D) Manufacturing Area
Packing Room (WP) NA
46 X 16 (PSSP PLANT)
25 X 14.5 (GSSP)
24.5 X 14 (N.P.K)
Centrifuge Area NA
Pulvariser Room (WP) NA
Drier Room (WP) NA
Mfg Area – A (GR FL) 1066.5
Mfg Area – B (GR FL) 343
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-3]
(E) C.H. Room, Engg Room E.T.C.
C.H. Room (Male) 15.55 4.26 X 3.65
Entrance Lobby Cum Lounge 36.0 6 X 6
Extra Room 15.55 4.26 X 65.3
Electrical Panel Room 55.3 7.9 X 7.4 (Main dist. Panel)
Extra Room 55.3 7.9 X 7.4
Engg & Maint. Room 60.0 12.0 X 5.0
Scrap Yard 120.0 20.6 X 5.0
Clerical Office 84.0 6.0 X 7.0
(Ground & First Floor)
Director office Cum Board Room 30.0 4.0 X 7.5
Pantry 6.0 2.0 X 3.0
(F) Quality Control Section
Chemical Lab. 48.0 12.4 X 4.0
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-4]
TABLE 2.2 LISTS OF EQUIPMENT & MACHINERY
Sr.
No.
Name of
Equipment
Make
MOC Capacity Motor
HP
1. Mixer MEGHVEE M.S./BL/LL 15 MT/hr 25
2. Den MEGHVEE M.S 17 MTS. 10
3. Cutter -- M.S -- 10
4. Conveyers -- -- -- 5
5. Grinding Mill Usha M.S 3 MT/hr 150
6. H. V. Jet Ejector -- PP/FRP -- 15
7. Ventury Scrubber -- PP/FRP -- 10
8. Cyclone -- M.S. -- --
9. Chimney -- PP/FRP -- --
10. Granulator
(Rotary Drum)
-- M.S. 5 MT/hr 10
11. Elevator -- M.S. -- 5
12. Screens -- M.S. -- 5
13. Chain Mill -- M.S. -- 10
14. Conveyers -- M.S. -- --
15. Chimney -- M.S. -- --
16. Storage Hopper -- M.S. -- --
17. Bag Filter Envirocare M.S 24 Bags 1
TABLE 2.2B LIST OF UTILITIES:
SR.
NO.
NAME OF
EQUIPMENT
MAKE
MOC CAPACITY MOTOR
HP
1. Suction Blower Karyasiddhi M.S./RL 12500 M3/hr 40
2. Dryer
(Rotary Drum)
-- M.S. 5 MT/hr 10
3. Cooler
(Rotary Drum)
-- M.S. 5 MT/hr 10
4. Hot Air
Generator
-- M.S./BL -- 5
5. Suction Blower -- M.S. 8000 M3/hr 20
6. Suction Blower -- M.S. 8000 M3/hr 15
7. D. G. Set Power Tech -- 125 KVA --
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-5]
2.3 MAIN PHASES OF THE PROJECT
2.3.1 Pre Construction Activities:
As proposed production of the Agro Fertilizers is within the existing premises, there is no need
to construct any approach road or site access. Existing shed will be used for storage of raw
material and finished product after expansion. Existing machinery have enough spare
production capacity to achieve expansion quantity.
2.3.2 Construction Activities:
Existing building/premises & plant-machinery will be utilized and no extra slab construction
required meeting expansion project including process machinery. Area utilized is 7700 m2 land
within premises.
2.3.3 Manufacturing Activities:
Manufacturing activities proposed in the project include various processes as a part of
manufacturing Agro Fertilizers. The activities shall also include operation of various utilities.
The manufacturing process is described in details in following sections.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-6]
TABLE 2.3 PHYSICO - CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RAW MATERIAL
Sr.
No. Name Formula
Molecular
Weight CAS No. State Color Odor
Melting
Point
°C
Boiling
Point
°C
Packing
1. Urea CH4N2O 60.06 57-13-6 Solid White odorless 132.7 NA 50 kg
HDPE Bags
2. DAP (NH4)2HPO4 132.07 7783-28-0 Solid White odorless 155.0 NA 50 kg
HDPE Bags
3. SSP Ca(H2PO4). H2O 252 7758-23-8 Solid Grey odorless 109.0 203 50 kg
HDPE Bags
4. MOP (Potash) KCL 74.55 7447-40-7 Solid White odorless 770.0 1420 50 kg
HDPE Bags
5. Filler CaMg(CO3)2 -- -- Solid White odorless NA NA Loose
Truck load
6. Rock Phosphate Ca3(PO4)2 310 7758-87-4 Solid White/
brown Odorless 1391.0 NA
Loose Truck
Load
7. Diluted Sulphuric
acid (70%) H2SO4 98 -- Liquid
Colour
less Odorless NA 160 Tanker Load
8. Fluoro Silisilic Acid
(by product) H2SiF6. H2O 96 16961-83-4 Liquid
Colour
less NA NA NA In house
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-7]
TABLE 2.4 PHYSICO - CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF PRODUCT
Sr.
No. Name Formula
Molecular
Weight
CAS
No. State Color Odor
Melting
Point
°C
Boiling
Point
°C
Packing
1. NPK Granulated
Mixed Fertilizers - - - Solid Brown NA NA NA
50 kg
HDPE Bag
2. Single Super
Phosphate Powder Ca (H2PO4). H2O 252 - Solid white NA NA NA
50 kg
HDPE Bag
3. Single Super
Phosphate Granulated Ca (H2PO4). H2O 252 - Solid Grey NA NA NA
50 kg
HDPE Bag
4. Fluoro Silisilic Acid
(by product) H2SiF6. H2O 96
16961-
83-4 Liquid
Colour
less NA NA NA Tanker Load
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-8]
TABLE 2.5 MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION OF RAW MATERIAL & PRODUCT
Sr.
No. Raw Material
Physical & Chemical Composition Sources of Supply
Means of
Transportation
Distance of
Supplier from
Project Km. Chemical Formula State
RAW MATERIAL
1. Urea CH4N2O Solid RCF, IPL By Truck 500
2. DAP (NH4)2HPO4 Solid RCF, IPL By Truck 500
3. SSP Ca (H2PO4). H2O Solid Captive By Truck Captive
4. MOP (Potash) KCL Solid RCF, IPL By Truck 500
5. Filler CaMg (CO3)2 Solid Captive By Truck 300
6. Rock Phosphate Ca3 (PO4)2 Solid RCCML By Truck 600
7. Diluted Sulphuric Acid (70%) H2SO4 Liquid Navchetan
Detergent Products By Truck 45
8. Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product)
H2SiF6. H2O Liquid Inhouse By Pump & Pipes Within Premises
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-9]
FINISHED PRODUCT
Sr.
No. Trade Name Chemical Formula Chemical Name State
Means of
Transportation
1. AGROPHOS -- NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers Solid By Truck
2. BAIL (OX)
BRAND Ca (H2PO4). H2O Single Super Phosphate Powder Solid By Truck
3. BAIL (OX)
BRAND Ca (H2PO4). H2O Single Super Phosphate Granulated Solid By Truck
4. -- H2SiF6. H2O Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product) Liquid By Truck
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-10]
TABLE 2.6 STORAGE DETAILS OF RAW MATERIAL & PRODUCT
Sr.
No. Raw Material State
Consumption
(MT/Month) Hazard
Involved Means of Storage
Capacity
of Vessel /
Bag/Box
No. of
Vessels /
bag/Box
Storage
Capacity
Max. Qty.
of Storage Existing Proposed
1.
Urea Solid 460 460 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags 20000
800
MT
1000
MT
2. DAP Solid 60 60 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags 14000
600
MT
700
MT
3.
SSP (Single Super
Phosphate) Solid 80 80 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags 5000
150
MT
250
MT
4. MOP (Potash)
Solid 271 271 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags 5000
150
MT
250
MT
5. Filler Solid 300 300 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags
20
Nos.
100
MT
250
MT
6.
Rock phosphate
Solid 1200 600 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
Loose
Form -
2000
MT
2500
MT
7. Diluted Sulphuric
acid (70%) Liquid 1000 500 Yes
HDPE Storage
Tanks
Tanker
Load
Tanks
5 Nos.
500
MT
600
MT
8.
Fluorosilisilic
Acid (by product)
Liquid 44 22 Yes HDPE storage
Tanks
Tanker
Load
Tanks
2 Nos.
40
MT
30
MT
9. SSP Solid 1000 1000 No
Godown
RCC structure
A/C sheets roofing
Loose Form - 800
MT
1000
MT
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-11]
Sr.
No. Product State
Production
(MT/Month) Hazard
Involved
Means of
Storage
Capacity
of Vessel /
Bag/Box
No. of
Vessels /
bag/Box
Storage
Capacity
Max. Qty.
of Storage Existing Proposed
1. NPK Granulated
Mixed Fertilizers Solid 1000 1000 No
RCC Structure
with slab
50 Kg
HDPE Bags
20000 600
MT
1000
MT
2. Single Super
Phosphate Powder Solid 2000 1000 No
RCC structure with A/C sheets
roofing & impervious
flooring
50 Kg HDPE Bags
& Loose Form For Curing
20000 2000
MT
3000
MT
3. Single Super
Phosphate Granulated Solid 1000 1000 No
RCC structure with A/C sheets
roofing
50 Kg
HDPE Bags
20000 800
MT
1000
MT
4. Fluorosilisilic Acid
(by product) Liquid 24 12 Yes
HDPE storage Tanks
Tanker Load
Tanks
2 Nos.
40
MT
30
MT
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-12]
PRODUCT PROFILE
TABLE 2.7[A] THE LIST OF RAW MATERIAL PRODUCTWISE
Sr.
No. Name of Raw Material
Existing
Quantity
(MT/Month)
Proposed
Quantity
(MT/Month)
Total
Quantity
(MT/Month)
(A) NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers
1. Urea 460 460 920
2. DAP 60 60 120
3. SSP (Single Super Phosphate) 80 80 160
4. MOP (Potash) 271 271 542
5. Filler 300 300 600
(B) Single Super Phosphate Powder
6. Fluorosilisilic Acid 44 22 66
7. Rock phosphate 1200 600 1800
8. Diluted sulphuric acid (70%) 1000 500 1500
(C) Single Super Phosphate Granulated
9. Single Super Phosphate Powder 1000 1000 2000
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-13]
TABLE 2.7[B] THE LIST OF PRODUCT
Sr.
No. Name of Product
Existing
Quantity
(MT/Month)
Proposed
Quantity
(MT/Month)
Total
Quantity
(MT/Month)
1. NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers 1000 1000 2000
2. Single Super Phosphate Powder 2000 1000 3000
3. Single Super Phosphate Granulated 1000 1000 2000
4. Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product)
Total : 68 Total : 34 Total : 102
Reuse : 44 Reuse : 22 Reuse : 66
Sell : 24 Sell : 12 Sell : 36
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-14]
2.4 MANUFACTURING PROCESS, CHEMICAL REACTION & MASS BALANCE
Mfg. Process Flow Chart & Description of
SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE POWDER (S.S.P.)
Main Reaction:
(1) 3Ca3 (PO4)2 +6 H2SO4 + 3 H2SiF6.H2O 6 CaSO 4 + 3Ca (H2PO4)2.H2O + 3 SiF4 + 6HF
(932) (588) (486) (817) (756) ( 313) (120)
Side Reaction:
(2) CaF2 + H2SO4 2HF + CaSO4
(78) (98) (4 0) (136)
(3) 4HF +SiO2 SiF4 + 2H2O
(80) (60) ( 104) (36)
(4) 3SiF4 + 3H2O 2H 2SiF6 + SiO2.H2O
(312) (54) (2 88) (78)
Upon Getting Reuse in Process For
15% - 17% Concentration Reduction of Water
in Scrubber Consumption As Per
Reaction No.1
Sellable in Market (Quantity: 22 MT/month)
(Quantity: 12 MT/month)
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-15]
(A) MASS BALANCE & MFG. PROCESS FLOW CHART
BASE: MT/ MONTH
FLUOROSILISILIC ACID (H2SiF6) (22)
H2SO4 ACID (70 %) (500)
ROCK PHOSPHATE (600) WATER (30)
WATER (15) EVAPORATION (0.2)
THICK SLURRY (1160)
SiF4 SILICA (1)
REUSE (22)
LOSSES (32)
SELL AS A BY PRODUCT (12)
PACKING OF POWDER S.S.P. (1000)
OVER SIZE MATERIAL
TO N.P.K. PRODUCT
SECTION (100)
MIXER
DEN
CUTTER
CURING YARD
POWDER PLANT
ROTARY SCREEN
WATER
SCRUBBER
FLUORO
SILISILIC ACID
(H2SiF6)
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-16]
(B) MFG. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The company is intending to manufacture single super phosphate the plant will have 120 M.T. per day
manufacturing capacity. The storage facilities for raw material system the plant designs will be based
on broad field system. The manufacturing process of S SP can be sub divided in
Raw material Section
Acidulation Section
Acid Section
Curing & Storage
Product Packing & Storage
Pollution Control
Raw Material Section:
Main raw material rock phosphate is available in the form fine powder / coarse chips. The proposed
plant is based on the use of fine powder, which is shipped and stored in loose condition in the go down.
The go down is land yard having retaining walls on both sides. Rock phosphate is heaped in the yard. A
hopper and conveyor will be provided in the go down for mechanical handling of material.
The rock phosphate of required fineness will be obtained from the source, hence grinding will not be
required. The ground rock powder will be fed into G.R. feed hopper, for feeding the rock to acidul ation
section through rock train.
Rock train consisting of Rotary valve Screw conveyors, Elevator, Surge hopper and Rotary feeder is
used for feeding ground Rock phosphate to the Acidulation Section
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-17]
Acidulation Section:
In this section processing takes place. This section consists of mixer and den (Main & R.P.) and acid
feeder. The mixer is a horizontal blending machine having mixing and knee ding section. Ground rock
phosphate and dilute Sulphuric acid is continuously fed into Mixer in fixed proportion. Due to
continuous agitation by rotating paddles. First two stage of reaction take place over here and the mass is
converted into thick slurry. A particular temperature and suction is maintained over here, for proper
reaction. The slurry is discharged by mixer directly into the other slow moving machine called den.
Den retains the slurry for advancement of reaction. Retention time of material in this section can be
changed based on the process need. A slow speed cutter is installed at the discharge end of den. The
den cutter chops the solid material into fine pieces, before discharging it from den. The material is
discharged by den continuously & slowly up to 85-90 % of reaction is completed at this stage.
The material being discharged by den is Green Super Phosphate. The balance reaction continues & is
completed slowly, in heap in next few days. Den discharged is shifted & heaped in Curing yard. The
material is directly discharged over rubber conveyer. A set of conveyer belts is installed in go down for
shifting heaping of Green Super Phosphate at different location in go down for curing. The Green
Super reshuffled 2 to 3 times & cured.
Acid Section:
Dilute Acid is required for reaction with rock phosphate. Hence dilute Sulphuric acid (an industrial
waste of various chemical plants) or concentrated Sulphuric Acid is procured from the nearby
industries. Simple diluter may be installed for diluting conc. Acid if required. This section will consist
of acid storage & acid service tank which will be installed in tank form area. Acid feed tank will be
kept in plant area Brought out acid will be unloaded in service tank & then transferred into the storage
tank acid will be transported to acid feed tank form service tank thought pump & pipe line acid will be
pumped from acid feed tank to acid feeder which will feed the required quantity into the mixer as per
ratio and excess quantity will be returned to the feed tank through respective pipe line scrubber liquor
feed tank and inlet / discharge pipeline will be provided to feed Scrubber liquor into the mixer in preset
proportion.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-18]
Curing and Storage:
The semi-finished goods, Green Super Phosphate will be kept in green SSP curing yard. The material is
directly discharged over green super belt, be den A set of cross and inclined belt conveyors is installed
for conveying the discharge of green super belt over the shuttle belt conveyor. The shuttle belt is used
for heaping green super Phosphate at deferent locations in curing go down. The green super is
reshuffled 2 to 3 times and cured with in 12-15 days.
Cured material is heaped and checked for quality after approval from QCD material required for
captive consumption is shifted to N.P.K. plant/granulation plant or powder packing section.
Product Packing Storage & Shipment:
The material for direct sale as single super Phosphate in granular or powder from is further processed
material is shifted to granulation plant for converting the powder into granules of desired size and
packed in HDPE bags and kept in go down for dispatch to dealers.
Material to be sold in powder from is screened in a rotary screen and fine powder is fed into packing
hopper for packing. The oversize grid is shifted to granulation plant for use after crushing in chain /
hammer mill.
The screened material is filled in bags & stitched after weighment and kept in day stores. The day
store’s material is shifted to product after quality check. Batch number is also marked over here before
shifting.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-19]
Pollution Control
In Process:
During acidulation fluorine content of rock phosphate is evolved as SiF4 gas. Fluorine bearing gases are
evolved during the reaction are to be removed before discharge to atmosphere. The gases evolved
during reaction in mixer and den is sucked by a high suction blower & is scrubbed in circulating water.
This section consists of H.V. jet scrubber, ventury water scrubber, cyclone separator, I.D. fan &
Chimney for sucking the gases from point of generation & discharging to atmosphere at height of thirty
Five meter, from ground level after due cleaning. All the specially designed equipment of the section is
lined with different anti-corrosive materials. This scrubber liquor, namely H2SiF6, is kept in lined pits
for settling. The solid silica in the liquor is separated here & kept. The clear liquor is kept in storage
tanks & is used in process for manufacturing of Green Super Phosphate.
The H2SiF6 liquor can also be used for manufacturing other Fluorine based chemicals, such as Sodium
Silico Fluoride. The silica can be sold or used as filler after sun drying.
As the liquor generated is recycled & used in process hence there will not be any liquid discharge from
the plant.
In Hot Air Generator:
Flue gas generated due to burning of bio-coal is allowed in to Dual Cyclone Dust Separator, where
mostly Dust particle is settled down due to gravitational flow & only clean Gas is generated after ID
fan & Chimney. Unit has plan to install Bag Filter after Dual Cyclone Separator in series.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-20]
Manufacturing Process Flow Chart & Description of
SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE GRANULATED
(A) MASS BALANCE & MANUFACTURING PROCESS FLOW CHART
BASE: MT/ MONTH
SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE
POWDER (1000) GRANULATED (100)
WATER (15)
RECYCLED MATERIAL (100)
EVAPORATION (100)
HOT AIR
LOSS (15)
AMBIENT AIR
OVER SIZED MATERIAL (50)
UNDER SIZED MATERIAL (50)
ROTARY DRUM
GRANULATOR
ROTARY
DRYER
ROTARY
COOLER
SCREENER
FINISHED PRODUCT
(GRANULATED S.S.P.)
PACKING (1 TO 5 MM)
1000 MT
100
(1000 KG)
CRUSHER
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-21]
(B) MANUFACTURING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The granulated fertilizers technology which is basically developed by tenancy valley authority know as
TVA design is adopted in our plant where in the different fertilizer materials in solid form are stored in
the different process bins from which proportionate quantities are drawn by volumetric method &
delivered to rotary drum granulator through bucket elevator. Injecting about 10 to 12 % moisture
moistens the materials. Due to moistening & rolling action of the material in the rotary drums granular
are formed. The move excess moisture the material is fed to Co-current rotary dryer. Hot air evaporates
the excess moisture & some is carried away to atmosphere through dust collector.
The hot granular coming out from the dryer are fed to rotary collars where the temperature of the
granular are brought down to ambient temperature by outer air draught the dried & called granulate
screened to separate out over size, under size & finished product material. The over sized material is
crushed & returned to the granulator along with under sized recycled material for reprocessing.
Finished product material that is in the range of 1 mm to 5 mm is taken to the bagging go down by
graving chute. The material is packed in 50 Kg HDPE bags & duly machine stitched.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-22]
Manufacturing Process Flow Chart & Description of
N.P.K – GRANULATED MIX FERTILISER
(A) MASS BALANCE & MANUFACTURING PROCESS FLOW CHART
BASE: MT/ MONTH
PADDLE MIXER
ROTARY DRUM
ROTARY
DRYER
ROTARY
COLLARS
SCREENER
FINISHED PRODUCT
PACKING
(GRANULATED N.P.K.)
(1 TO 5 MM)
(1000 MT)
CRUSHER
SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE (80)
UNDER SIZED MATERIAL (50)
OVER SIZED MATERIAL
(50)
LOSS (15)
EVAPORATION (171)
WATER (15)
RECYCLED MATERIAL (100)
AMBIENT
AIR
HOT AIR
MOP (POTASH) (271)
FILLER (300)
D.A.P. (60)
UREA (460)
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-23]
(B) MANUFACTURING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The granulated fertilizers technology which is basically developed by tenancy valley authority know as
TVA design is adopted in our plant where in the different fertilizer materials in solid form are stored in
the different process bins from which proportionate quantities are drawn by volumetric method &
delivered to common belt conveyer which is turn delivers to paddle mixture where the material is
delivered to rotary drum granulator through bucket elevator. Injecting about 10 to 12 % moisture
moistens the materials. Due to moistening & rolling action of the material in the rotary drums granular
are formed. To remove excess moisture, the material is fed to Co-current rotary dryer. Hot air
evaporates the excess moisture & some is carried away to atmosphere through dust collector.
The hot granular coming out from the dryer are fed to rotary collars where the temperature of the
granular are brought down to ambient temperature by outer air draught the dried & called granulate
screened to separate out cover size, under size & finished product material. The over sized material is
crushed & returned to the granulator along with under sized recycled material for reprocessing.
Finished product material that is in the range of 1 mm to 5 mm is taken to the bagging go down by
graving chute. The material is packed 50 Kg HDPE bags & duly machine stitched.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-24]
2.5 WATER BALANCE
Water requirement for the project will be met from the bore well. The details of water requirement are
given below. The details include purpose, type of water required, peak demand and avg. demand for
different categories. For Water Balance diagram refer Figure 2.1
Water Consumption
(KL/Day)
Effluent Generation
(KL/Day)
Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total
(A) Domestic 2.5 2.5 5.0 1.0 1.5 2.5
(B) Industrial
I. Process 2.0 2.0 4.0 Nil Nil Nil
II. Utility
(For Scrubber) 0.5 0.5 1.0 Nil Nil Nil
III. Washing Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Total (B) 2.5 2.5 5.0 Nil Nil Nil
Total (A+B) 5.0 5.0 10.0 1.0 1.5 2.5
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-25]
FIGURE 2.1 WATER BALANCE DIAGRAM
Basis: KL/day
Total Water Require
10.0
5.0 Industrial
Domestic
Process Utility 5.0
4.0 (Scrubber)
1.0
2.5
Septic Tank
Nil Scrubbed Liquid
(H2SiF6 for reuse)
There shall be no generation of trade effluent, only domestic sewage will be generated,
which will be allowed to dispose in an existing septic tank.
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat January-2011
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[2-26]
2.6 SOURCES OF ENERGY
The main sources of power of M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. will be utilized energy from existing
provider M/s. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited. The total existing connected load of the energy is
about 492 KWH.
Additional 75 KWH will require for expansion project which would be applied to DGVCL as & when
required.
In case of power failure the unit proposed to install D. G. set of capacity 125 KVA as the backup power
supply.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-1]
3.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
The baseline status of the environment quality in the vicinity of the project site serves as the
basis for identification, prediction and evaluation of the impacts. The baseline environmental
quality is assessed through field studies within the impact zone for various components of the
environment, viz. air, noise, water, and land and socio-economic. The baseline environmental
quality has been assessed in the winter season (December 2010 – February 2011) in a study
area of 10 km radial distance from the project site.
Knowledge of baseline environmental status of the study area is useful for Impact Assessment
Process of assessing and predicting the environmental consequences of the significant actions.
Significant action depicts direct adverse changes caused by the action and its effect on the
health of the biota including flora, fauna and human being, socio-economic conditions, current
use of land and resources, physical and cultural heritage properties and biophysical
surroundings.
Baseline data generation of the following environmental attributes essential in EIA studies
have been studied and included in the report.
1. Meteorology
2. Ambient Air Quality
3. Ambient Noise Quality
4. Surface and Ground water Quality
5. Soil Quality & Geological Features
6. Land use pattern
7. Biological Information
8. Socio-economic status survey
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-2]
3.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF IMPACT ZONE
Deciding whether a proposed action is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects
is central to the concept and practice of EIA. Before proceeding for baseline data generation, it
is important to know the boundary limits and framework, so that the data generated can be
utilized for the effective and accurate prediction of the environmental impact assessment of the
proposed project.
3.3 METEOROLOGY
Air borne pollutants is dispersed by atmosphere motion. Knowledge of these motions, which
range is scale from turbulent diffusion to long-range transport by weather systems, is essential
to simulate such dispersion and quality of impacts of air pollution on the environment. The
purpose of EIA is to determine whether average concentrations are likely to encounter at fixed
locations (know as the receptor), due to the given sources (locations and rates of emission
known), under idealized atmospheric conditions. It is imperative that one should work with
idealized condition and all analysis pertaining to air turbulence and ambient air or noise
pollution should be done with meteorological conditions, which can at best be, expected to
occur.
3.4 MICRO-METEOROLOGY OF THE AREA
The climate of the district is characterized by hot summer and general dryness except in the
coastal region. The year is divided into four seasons. The cold season December to February
followed by the hot season from March to May, June to September is South-West Monsoon
season and October and November form the post monsoon season. The Arabian Sea and the
Gulf of Cambay in the west and the forest-covered hills in the east soften the rigors of climatic
extremes, consequently reducing the temperature and render the climate more pleasant and
healthy.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-3]
3.4.1 Temperature Details
Mean daily maximum temperature is recorded in the month of May is 36.0 °C. Highest mean
temperature, recorded in May is 42.0 °C. From October to December, both day and night
temperatures begin to decrease rapidly. January is generally the coldest month, with mean
morning temperature of 10.0 °C. Mean daily minimum temperature of about 13.3 °C is
recorded in January.
During the post monsoon months of October and November, day temperatures remain between
24.0 – 32.0 °C. In winters, i.e. December, January and February, average day temperature
remains between 18.0 – 26.0 °C.
3.4.2 Relative Humidity
Most humid conditions are found in the monsoon, followed by post monsoon, winter and
summer in the order. Mornings are more humid than evenings and humidity ranges from a high
of 75-100% in monsoon mornings to a low of 5-61% in summer evenings. During post
monsoon season, in morning humidity remains between 61-99 % and in the evening it remains
between 19-82 %.
Nearest IMD station from the project site is Surat Airport, Surat.
3.4.3 Rainfall
The total rainfall in year is observed to be 1083.5 mm. Distribution of rainfall by season is 0.0
mm in winter (December, January, February), 0.0 mm in summer (March, April, May), 1029.9
mm in monsoon (June, July, August, September) and 53.6 mm in post monsoon (October,
November).
3.4.4 Wind
The predominant wind direction during the period of April-10 to March-11 is as mentioned in
the Table 3.1.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-4]
Table 3.1 Predominant Wind Direction:
Predominant
Month
First Second Third
Morning Evening Morning Evening Morning Evening
April-10 Calm SW SW Calm NE W
May-10 SW SW Calm NW N S
June-10 SW SW Calm Calm NW WSW
July-10 SW SW Calm Calm WSW WSW
August-10 SW SW Calm Calm S NNE
September-10 Calm SW SW Calm NE NW
October-10 Calm Calm NE SW NW NW
November-10 NE Calm Calm NE NNE SW
December-10 Calm Calm NE NE NNW NW
January-11 NE NE Calm N N Calm
February-11 Calm NW NE NE N N
March-11 Calm SW NE NW N Calm
(Courtesy: Indian Meteorological Department (IMD))
The predominant wind direction during the study period (Dec-10 to Feb-11) is observed to be
from NE direction.
3.4.5 Cloud Cover
The area remains cloudy between June- Septembers, which is the active period of the monsoon
season.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-5]
3.5 SITE SPECIFIC METEOROLOGICAL DATA
(PERIOD–DEC. 1, 2010 to FEB. 28, 2011)
Site- specific meteorological data shows that average wind speed in the winter season is 2.0
km/hr.
Wind rose prepared for winter season is shown in Fig: 3.1. It can be observed that in the winter
season, wind blows mostly from NE direction. Calm wind contributes to about 27.7 %.
Average temperature recorded for winter season was 22.5 °C with maximum temperature of
35.0 °C and minimum of 10.0 °C, which is a characteristic of this study area.
The average humidity recorded was 53.7 % with maximum humidity of 98.0 % and minimum
of 11.0%.
The data obtained has then been complied to obtain average data. Complied mean
meteorological data is represented in Table: 3.2.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-6]
Table 3.2 Mean Meteorological Data During Study Period:
Hour Temp. °C Relative
Humidity %
Wind Speed
Km/hr
Wind
Direction
01 26.4 68.2 2.0 ESE
02 26.1 69.8 1.9 NE
03 25.5 70.3 1.9 ESE
04 25.1 72.0 2.0 E
05 24.8 75.1 2.1 E
06 24.3 76.4 2.2 N
07 24.0 77.6 2.3 N
08 24.1 77.1 2.1 NNW
09 25.6 72.6 2.3 NNW
10 27.3 64.3 2.7 NNW
11 29.1 56.8 0.0 NW
12 30.8 51.2 2.9 NNW
13 31.2 49.3 2.8 NW
14 31.9 48.7 2.8 NNW
15 32.8 46.2 3.0 NNW
16 32.8 45.6 3.0 NE
17 32.4 45.9 2.7 NE
18 31.3 49.9 2.2 NE
19 29.5 55.2 2.0 ESE
20 27.6 56.4 2.0 ESE
21 26.3 58.3 1.9 NW
22 26.3 60.1 2.0 ENE
23 24.8 63.0 2.0 ENE
24 24.4 66.2 1.9 N
AVERAGE/
PREDOMINANT 27.9 61.5 2.3 NNW
The wind rose diagram processed by Lake Environment software from data collected at site is
shown below.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-7]
Figure 3.1 Wind Rose Diagram:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-8]
3.6 AIR ENVIRONMENT
3.6.1 Design of Network for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
The air quality status in the impact zone is assessed through a network of ambient air quality
monitoring locations. The tropical climatic conditions mainly control the transport and
dispersion of air pollutant emissions during various seasons. The baseline studies for air
environment include identification of specific air pollutants prior to implementation of the
project. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study requires monitoring of baseline air
quality during one season. Accordingly, air quality monitoring was carried out in the winter
season from Dec. 1, 2010 to Feb. 28, 2011. The baseline status of the air environment is
assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance programme, which is planned based on
the following criteria:
• Topography / terrain of the study area
• Regional synoptic scale climatologically normal
• Densely populated areas within the region
• Location of surrounding industries
• Representation of regional background
• Representation of valid cross-sectional distribution in downwind direction
3.6.2 Reconnaissance
Reconnaissance was undertaken to establish the baseline status of air environment in the study
region. Five nos. of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) locations were selected based
on guidelines of network sitting criteria. All AAQM locations were selected within the study
area of 10 km radial distance from the project site.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-9]
3.6.3 Methodology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
The ambient air quality monitoring was carried out in accordance with guidelines of Central
Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of June 1998 and National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) of CPCB of May 1994. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) was carried out
at Five locations during winter season. The maximum numbers of sampling locations were
selected close to the project site and in the study area of 10 km radial distance around the plant
site. The monitoring was carried out 24 hours a day twice a week per location in the study area
except the project site, where continuous monitoring was carried out. Twenty Four numbers of
observations were taken at each monitoring location except the project site. The locations of
the different stations with respect to its distance and direction from project site are shown in
Table- 3.3 and Figure-3.2 respectively.
Table 3.3 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
Sr.
No.
Name of village
bearing W.R.T.
Project site
Approximate
Radial distance
From project
Site (km)
Direction
From project
Site
1. Project Site (A1) 0.0 -
2. Asthagam Village (A2) 3.2 ENE
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 5.8 ESE
4. Khadsupa (A4) 4.4 SWS
5. Unn (A5) 1.4 NWN
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-10]
Figure 3.2 Location of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-11]
The conventional and project specific parameters such as Particulate Matter having size less
then 10µg (PM10), Particulate Matter having size less then 2.5µg (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide
(SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) and Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) were monitored at site.
The values for mentioned concentrations of various pollutants at all the monitoring locations
were processed for different statistical parameters like arithmetic mean, minimum
concentration, and maximum concentration and percentile values. The existing baseline levels
of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx and HF are expressed in terms of various statistical parameters as
given in Tables-3.4(A-F).
Table 3.4 (A): Ambient Air Quality Status (December, 2010 to February, 2011 )
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr
.
N
o.
Sampling Location
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX HF
Average
(min-max)
1. Project Site (A1) 65.5
(35.2-85.2)
28.7
(11.0-40.1)
15.6
(7.2-20.4)
17.1
(9.5-27.6)
0.13
(0.01-0.22)
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
60.4
(23.4-81.4)
39.4
(15.5-53.9)
22.7
(11.0-35.6)
24.6
(12.6-41.1)
0.15
(0.01-0.23)
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 51.5
(26.3-79.4)
36.9
(19.8-56.2)
15.3
(8.9-22.5)
19.1
(9.8-30.1)
0.14
(0.01-0.23)
4. Khadsupa (A4) 53.1
(21.1-80.1)
38.5
(20.1-59.4)
14.0
(5.2-22.2)
17.2
(7.8-28.9)
0.14
(0.01-0.22)
5. Unn (A5) 53.0
(21.1-80.1)
38.9
(10.5-56.8)
15.8
(10.1-33.5)
19.8
(10.3-46.8)
0.15
(0.01-0.23)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-12]
Table 3.4 (B): Cumulative Percentiles of PM10
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location Min
Percentile
Max 25 50 75 98
1. Project Site (A1) 35.2 60.03 66.80 73.28 81.10 85.2
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
23.4 49.50 62.50 73.65 80.33 81.4
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 26.3 41.45 50.35 60.18 77.85 79.4
4. Khadsupa (A4) 21.1 46.65 54.15 62.10 78.20 80.1
5. Unn (A5) 21.1 44.68 54.70 62.93 78.20 80.1
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 100 µg/m3 (for residential areas)
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 100 µg/m3 (for industrial areas)
Table 3.4 (C): Cumulative Percentiles of PM2.5
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location Min
Percentile
Max 25 50 75 98
1. Project Site (A1) 11.0 25.33 29.15 33.80 39.81 40.1
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
15.5 30.35 42.55 49.55 52.89 53.9
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 19.8 29.65 36.40 43.50 52.70 56.2
4. Khadsupa (A4) 20.1 29.15 39.85 49.43 54.0 59.4
5. Unn (A5) 10.5 30.0 40.91 48.81 56.50 56.8
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 60 µg/m3 (for residential areas)
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 60 µg/m3 (for industrial areas)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-13]
Table 3.4 (D): Cumulative Percentiles of SO2
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location Min
Percentile Max
25 50 75 98
1. Project Site (A1) 7.2 14.03 16.20 17.33 20.36 20.4
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
11.0 18.4 23.4 26.5 30.86 35.6
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 8.9 13.35 15.16 16.80 20.80 22.5
4. Khadsupa (A4) 5.2 11.79 13.80 16.20 20.80 22.2
5. Unn (A5) 10.1 12.46 14.85 18.28 30.53 33.5
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 80 µg/m3 (for residential areas)
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 80 µg/m3 (for industrial areas)
Table 3.4 (E): Cumulative Percentiles of NOX
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location Min
Percentile Max
25 50 75 98
1. Project Site (A1) 9.5 15.50 16.50 19.40 24.65 27.6
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
2.6 17.35 24.00 30.10 40.10 41.1
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 9.8 15.20 17.86 22.37 29.85 30.1
4. Khadsupa (A4) 7.8 14.60 16.52 20.43 27.13 28.9
5. Unn (A5) 10.3 15.40 17.60 20.43 45.36 46.8
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 80 µg/m3 (for residential areas)
NAAQ Standard of CPCB (98th percentile): 80 µg/m3 (for industrial areas)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-14]
Table 3.4 (F): Cumulative Percentiles of HF
Unit: µg/m3
Period: 24 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location Min
Percentile Max
25 50 75 98
1. Project Site (A1) 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.22 0.22
2. Asthagam Village
(A2)
0.01 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.23 0.23
3. Bhulafalia (A3) 0.01 0.08 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.23
4. Khadsupa (A4) 0.01 0.09 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.22
5. Unn (A5) 0.01 0.10 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.23
3.6.4 Techniques Used for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring:
The technique used for ambient air quality monitoring of the above mentioned parameters are
as mentioned in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5 Technique Used For AAQM:
Sr.
No. Parameter Instrument used for analysis
1 Hydrogen Fluoride High Volume Gaseous Sampler-
Colorimeter
2. Sulphur dioxide High Volume Gaseous Sampler-
Colorimeter
3. Nitrogen Oxide High Volume Gaseous Sampler-
Colorimeter
4. Particulate Matter (PM10) High Volume Air Sampler
5 Particulate Matter (PM2.5) High Volume Air Sampler with PM2.5
Attachment (Cyclone)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-15]
3.6.5 Flue Gas Characteristics
The details regarding characteristics of the various flue gases generated at the site are given in
Table 3.6(A&B). The details include:
- Pollutant parameter
- Source of emission
- Emission concentration
- Emission Rate
FLUE GAS CHARACTERISTICS
Table 3.6 (A): Details of Stack, APCS & Its Emission Estimate
Stack
Attached
To
Height&
Top Dia.
of Stack
Type of Fuel & Qty. Source of
Fuel
Air Pollution Control
System Final
Concentration
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Hot Air
Generator
1 & 2
11
meter
&
500 mm
L.D.O. 40
Ltr/Hr.
Bio Coal 5 MT/day
Local
Traders
Dual
Cyclone
Separator
Bag Filter
PM < 150
mg/NM3
SO2 < 100 PPM
NOx < 50 PPM
D. G. Set (Stand By)
(Capacity: 125
KVA)
8 Meter Nil HSD 15 Lit/hr
Local
Petroleum
Product
Supplier
Not
Applicable Not
Applicable SPM < 150
mg/NM3
SO2 < 100
ppm NOx < 50
ppm
Evaluation for Stack Height:
(1) For Hot Air Generator
H = 14 (Q)0.3
Where, H = Stack Height in meters
Q = Emission rate of SO
H = 14 (0.15)0.3
= 7.92 m ≈ 8 m
NOTE: The stack height of Hot Air Generator will be 11 m which is above the statutory
requirement (8 m) as per the Environmental Standards set by CPCB.
Sr.
No. Stack Attached to Parameter
Emission Estimate in Kg/hr
Existing Proposed Total
1 Hot Air Generator
1 & 2
PM 0.175 0.075 0.075
SOx 0.1 0.05 0.05
NOx 0.063 0.025 0.025
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-16]
Table 3.6 (B): Details of Process Vent , APCS & Its Emission Estimate
Process Vent
Attached To Height & Top Dia. of
Stack Air Pollution Control
System Final Concentration
Den & Mixture 35 Meter &
600 mm
Ventury Water
Scrubber
PM < 150 mg/NM3
SO2 < 40 mg/NM3
NOx < 25 mg/NM3
Fluorine < 0.5 mg/NM3
The minimum stack height should be either 30 m or as per the equation H = 14 (Q)0.3
(whichever is greater) as per Environmental Standards set by CPCB.
(1) For Den & Mixture
H = 14 (Q)0.3
Where, H = Stack Height in meters
Q = Emission rate of SO2
Since, the emission rate of SO2 will be Nil, minimum stack height should be 30 m. the unit
proposed to keep the stack height to be 35 m, which i s above the statutory requirement.
Sr.
No. Stack Attached to Parameter
Emission Estimate in Kg/hr
Existing Proposed Total
1 Den & Mixture
(Process Vent)
(Flow: 2500 M3/Hr.)
PM 0.13 0.065 0.195
SOx Nil Nil Nil
NOx 0.005 0.0025 0.0075
HF 0.001 0.0005 0.0015
Fluorine Gas 0.001 0.0005 0.0015
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-17]
3.6.6 Scrubber System Details:
The unit have already available Water scrubber of adequate capacity to handle proposed qty. of
SiF4 gas to be generated.
Fluorine bearing gases are evolved during the reaction are to be removed before discharge to
atmosphere. The gases evolved during reaction in mixer and den is sucked by a high suction
blower & is scrubbed in circulating water. This section consists of H.V jet scrubber, Ventury
water scrubber, cyclone separator, Bag Filter, I.D. fan & chimney for sucking the gases from
point of generation & discharging to atmosphere at height of 35 meter, from ground level after
due cleaning. All the specially designed equipment of the section is lined with different anti-
corrosive materials. This scrubber liquor, namely H2SiF6, is kept in lined pits for settling. The
solid silica in the liquor is separated here & kept. The clear liquor is kept in storage tanks & is
used in process for manufacturing of Single Super Phosphate.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-18]
In Hot Air Generator:
Flue gas generated due to burning of bio-coal will be allowed to Dual Cyclone Dust separator
& Proposed Bag Filter installed in series, where mostly dust particles will be settled down and
only filtered clean gas will be generated after ID fan & Chimney. Design details of proposed
Bag Filter is attached as per Fig 3.3
Source of fugitive emission from the unit along with its quantification and Proposed
measures to control it.
Following are the sources of fugitive emission
- Material Storage
- During process
- Material Handling
In material storage & material handling, when fugitive emission occurred to its threshold limit,
automatic censor alarms and operator in shift will immediate start blower to suck fugitive gases
and simultaneously start scrubber also.
Than after he remove that material from that area and send to repacking or use in process.
In process: operator Incharge will handle unit processes & its operation to minimize risk of
fugitive emission.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-19]
DESIGN DETAILS OF H2SiF6 SCRUBBER
Unit already have installed water scrubber to absorb H2SiF6 gas to be generated during
manufacturing process of SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE.
The details of Scrubber is described as below & its flow diagram is as shown in Fig 3.3.
Sr.
No. Description Capacity
1. Diameter : 0.5 m
2. Height : 31.9 m
3. Water Pump Capacity : 1 M3/hr
4. Water Storage tank Capacity : 1000 Lit
5. Scrubbing Efficiency : 90 %
6. Scrubbing water Temperature : 25-30 °C
7. Type of packing media : Lessing ring
8. MOC of packing media : Plastic & Ceramic
9. Water- HCL solubility at ambient temperature : Infinite
10. Quantity of scrubbed gas : H2FiS6 1.5 kg/ day
Due to manufacturing of SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE, H2SiF6 gas will be generated,
which will be absorbed in existing water scrubber to recover valuable Fluorosilisilic acid as a
by-product. The same will be utilized as a raw material again in the process as well as resale.
Note:
Unit scrubber water storage capacity = 1000 lit.
Average ambient temperature of scrubber water in is 25 – 43°C.
As per MSDS, H2FiS6 gases will be soluble in water at temperature 25°C is @ of
infinite.
Thus, scrubbing capacity of our scrubber is 200 kg/batch of H2FiS6.
Name of the gas Total gas generated at
max. production Kg/hr.
Scrubbing capacity of
H2SiF6 Scrubber
Kg/batch
H2FiS6 0.002 200
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-20]
FIG: 3.3 SCRUBBER DETAILS
Stack Height: 35 m
Stack Dia: 600 mm
Water In
900
1100 mm
mm
600 mm
Scrubbed Water 35m
1500 1500
mm mm H2SiF6 Absorption Tower
750
mm
Blower
Rock
Phospha
Recycle
Storage
Tank H2SiF6
AB
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-21]
DESIGN DETAILS OF PROPOSED BAG FILTER
(1) Basis of Design:
Name of equipment : Hot Air Generator
Designed Gas Flow : 2500 M3/hr.
Media Type : Hot air
Max. Air Temp. : 80-90 oC
Inlet Dust Load : 6-8 gm/M3
Outlet Emission : < 150 mg/Nm3
Flue Gas particle size : Assumed-10>% (90% Microns)
Inlet Pressure : (-)140-180 mm WG
Quality of Pulse Air Required : Moisture < 50 ppm , 6-7 Kg/cm2 Pressure
(2) Technical Specification of Bag Filter:
Bag Filter Designed Capacity :
Approx. Weight : 1-2 MT
Type : Reverse online Pulse jet type, Self Supported
MOC : M.S. with two coat Red oxide.
Gas Flow : 2500 M3/hr.
Pressure drop : 125 - 150 mm WG (max.)
Air to cloth ratio : 1.15 meter3/minute/m
2)
Bag Filtration area : 1.48 M2/ Bag,
Total Filtration area : 47.36 M2
Type of Bag Filter : Nomex Woven
Bag dimensions : 118 Ø x 4000 mm L ,700 gm/M2
Total No. of Bag : 24
Max. Bag Operating Temperature : < 150 oC
Min. Bag Operating Temperature : >50 oC
MOC of Bag Cage : G.I, Fabricated with 3 mm Ø wire
MOC of Ventury : M.S.
Bag Permeability : 18-20 m3/m2/min
Dust outlet : Through C.S. rotary air lock valve
(01 Nos.-100TPH,150NB) with Gearbox (15 RPM)
& Motor (1 HP)
Timer: 10 Channel, Input Voltage : 230 Volt AC Output Voltage: 230 Volt AC
Operating Temperature : 160oC – 250
oC
Bag filter hopper thick : 3mm
Tube sheet thick : 5 mm
Tope Cover thick : 3 mm
Casing thick : 5 mm
Compressed clean air required : Moisture Free, 6 -7 Kgs/cm2 pressure (By Unit)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-22]
Type & Qty. of Solenoid valve : 04, Diaphragam,Integral
Solenoid valve Size & Op. Pressure : 1.5 inch, 5-7 Bar
Insulation : Mineral wool, 50mm thick, Aluminium 24
SWG
(By Unit)
Accessories : Inbuilt Damper, Hopper Heater, Manometer
Temp.
Gauge, Self supporting structure (1 mtr. ht.
from bottom Flange) & one open able door
(Top Side) for Maintenance services.
(3) Operation of Bag Filter:
The dust laden gases enter the pre- separation plenum
1. Where they meet the low baffle plate
2. The baffle wall protects the sleeves against the direct flow. The air velocity is reduced in
the pre- separation plenum. The coarse dust fraction leaves the air flow and falls into the
dust collection hopper.
3. The gas laden with the fine remaining dust enters the filter plenum.
4. After deflection by the baffle plate.
5&6. The sleeves (6) fitted over supports (5) receive the flow in the outside. The fine dust is
deposited on the outside of the filter sleeves.
7. The air penetrates through the filter fabric into the inside of the sleeves and rises into the
clean air plenum.
8. From here it can either be led out of the doors.
9. Or returned to the workshop. The control of the cleaning process for the filter sleeves
depends either on the differential pressure or an infinitely electronic timer. The dust
particles clinging to the filter sleeves are removed through short, sharp compressed air
impacts. Compressed air at 5-7 bar shoots out of electronically activated diaphragm
valves into the corresponding opened distribution line and from there into the nozzles.
The cleaning stream causes a strong counter pressure in the sleeve.
10. The sleeve, which until then was passed against its support, is suddenly extended to its
full size. The particles of dust are blown off. Small dust is blown off. Small dust
particles, which had penetrated the filter fabric, are loosened by the short, but strong
cleaning flow, and pressed back to the dust- laden side.
When the diaphragm valves have closed, the cleaned filter sleeves are once again ready
for the normal filter process. All rows of sleeves are cleaned in a fixed sequence. The
cleaning time is so short that practically always the whole filter surface of the filter is
available. Moreover the necessary compressed air quantity in relation to the flow volume
is the same up- and down- line of the filter.
The compressed air impacts are controlled by an electronic timer. Impacted regularity
can be continuously set with the electronic timer, depending on the type and amount of
dust.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-23]
3.6.7 General Observations
The observations based on the study results are summarized in Table-3.4 (A-F):
PM10 & PM2.5:
The average values for PM10 were observed to be between 85.2 µg/m3 to 21.1 µg/m3 against a
maximum permissible limit of 100 µg/m3
for industrial as well as for residential areas. While
average value for PM2.5 were observed to be between 59.4 µg/m3 to 10.5 µg/m
3 against a
maximum permissible limit of 60 µg/m3 for residential areas & 60 µg/m
3 for industrial areas
which is well within the permissible limits of NAAQS.
SO2 & NOX:
The average values for SO2 were observed to be between 35.6 µg/m3 to 5.2 µg/m
3 against a
maximum permissible limit of 80 µg/m3 for residential areas & 80 µg/m
3 for industrial areas.
The average values for NOX are observed to be between 41.1 µg/m3 to 9.5 µg/m3 against a
maximum permissible limit of 80 µg/m3 for residential areas & 80 µg/m
3 for industrial areas,
which is well within the permissible limits of NAAQS.
HF:
The average values for HF are observed to be between 0.23 µg/m3 to 0.01 µg/m
3 against a
maximum permissible limit of 4.0 µg/m3 for residential areas & 4.0 µg/m
3 for industrial areas,
which is well within the permissible limits of NAAQS.
We have used guassian plume model for gases to be generated from our stack / vents on
nearby our area attached as per the data mentioned below in Table No. 3.7 (A-E) . The
Plume model is as shown in Fig 3.4- 3.8(A)
The air quality contour is prepared as per latest available IMD data & its impact area on
satellite map is attached as per Fig 3.5
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-24]
TABLE NO. 3.7 (A) RESULT FOR FUGITIVE GAS
DIRECTION DISTANCE (Meters) (DEGREES) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
360 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 40 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 50 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 60 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 70 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 80 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 90 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
100 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 110 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 120 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 130 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 140 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 150 0.003 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 160 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 170 0.008 0.010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 180 0.011 0.014 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 190 0.012 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 200 0.015 0.020 0.019 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.012 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 210 0.021 0.025 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 220 0.020 0.024 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 230 0.019 0.020 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 240 0.013 0.016 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-25]
250 0.012 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 260 0.008 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 270 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 280 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 290 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 300 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 310 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 320 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 330 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 340 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 350 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-26]
Figure 3.4 (A): Guassian Plume Model for Fugitive Gas
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-27]
Figure 3.4(B) Air Quality Contour for Fugitive Gas:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-28]
TABLE NO. 3.7 (B) RESULT FOR HF GAS:
DIRECTION DISTANCE (Meters) (DEGREES) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
360 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 40 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 50 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 60 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 70 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 80 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 90 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
100 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 110 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 120 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 130 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 140 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 150 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 160 0.006 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 170 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 180 0.009 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 190 0.012 0.015 0.012 0.009 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 200 0.015 0.020 0.023 0.018 0.017 0.019 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 210 0.021 0.025 0.019 0.011 0.010 0.012 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.001
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-29]
220 0.022 0.020 0.016 0.017 0.014 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 230 0.019 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 240 0.017 0.019 0.018 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 250 0.012 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.011 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 260 0.010 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 270 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 280 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 290 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 300 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 310 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 320 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 330 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 340 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 350 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-30]
Figure 3.5 (A): Guassian Plume Model for HF gas
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-31]
Figure 3.5(B) Air Quality Contour for HF gas:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-32]
TABLE NO. 3.7 (C) RESULTS FOR NOx GAS:
DIRECTION DISTANCE (Meters) (DEGREES) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
360 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
20 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
40 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
60 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
70 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
80 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
90 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000
100 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
110 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
120 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000
130 0.014 0.017 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000
140 0.017 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000
150 0.020 0.026 0.021 0.014 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.009 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001
160 0.030 0.041 0.030 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.010 0.012 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001
170 0.044 0.052 0.038 0.028 0.020 0.013 0.012 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.001
180 0.062 0.077 0.056 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.027 0.024 0.021 0.016 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001
190 0.091 0.104 0.072 0.054 0.040 0.028 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.018 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001
200 0.120 0.140 0.119 0.101 0.096 0.088 0.082 0.075 0.070 0.065 0.004 0.020 0.001 0.013 0.003
210 0.140 0.151 0.112 0.090 0.066 0.056 0.050 0.044 0.036 0.030 0.012 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.002
220 0.141 0.158 0.116 0.088 0.075 0.062 0.053 0.048 0.042 0.037 0.016 0.010 0.006 0.004 0.003
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-33]
230 0.133 0.144 0.108 0.082 0.067 0.062 0.054 0.045 0.040 0.039 0.018 0.012 0.007 0.006 0.002
240 0.110 0.115 0.080 0.060 0.048 0.038 0.032 0.026 0.025 0.022 0.009 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.001
250 0.084 0.091 0.074 0.059 0.050 0.047 0.041 0.037 0.033 0.034 0.015 0.009 0.006 0.004 0.001
260 0.061 0.072 0.047 0.034 0.026 0.024 0.016 0.019 0.014 0.014 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.000
270 0.050 0.060 0.048 0.014 0.038 0.035 0.035 0.030 0.027 0.023 0.016 0.008 0.008 0.002 0.002
280 0.036 0.036 0.025 0.020 0.017 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.000
290 0.022 0.024 0.018 0.015 0.012 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000
300 0.011 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000
310 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
320 0.002 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
330 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
340 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
350 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-34]
Figure 3.6 (A): Guassian Plume Model for NOx:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-35]
Figure 3.6(B) Air Quality Contour for NOx:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-36]
TABLE NO. 3.7 (D) RESULTS FOR SO 2 GAS
DIRECTION DISTANCE (Meters) (DEGREES) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
360 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 40 0.008 0.007 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 50 0.008 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 60 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 70 0.009 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 80 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 90 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000
100 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 110 0.008 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 120 0.016 0.013 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 130 0.022 0.022 0.015 0.018 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 140 0.030 0.029 0.021 0.016 0.017 0.013 0.015 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 150 0.044 0.036 0.027 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 160 0.059 0.055 0.035 0.031 0.028 0.025 0.018 0.014 0.019 0.016 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 170 0.087 0.067 0.041 0.030 0.022 0.017 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 180 0.126 0.102 0.068 0.054 0.045 0.036 0.030 0.027 0.023 0.021 0.008 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 190 0.177 0.135 0.081 0.058 0.047 0.035 0.027 0.023 0.017 0.014 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.000 200 0.224 0.186 0.157 0.142 0.133 0.118 0.105 0.095 0.084 0.075 0.035 0.027 0.018 0.010 0.004 210 0.256 0.195 0.134 0.101 0.085 0.072 0.056 0.052 0.045 0.038 0.014 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.002 220 0.267 0.203 0.138 0.111 0.094 0.088 0.068 0.056 0.050 0.042 0.019 0.015 0.006 0.004 0.001
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-37]
230 0.244 0.184 0.132 0.108 0.086 0.079 0.065 0.054 0.048 0.041 0.016 0.014 0.005 0.004 0.003 240 0.210 0.142 0.095 0.066 0.052 0.045 0.039 0.028 0.027 0.020 0.009 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.001 250 0.158 0.120 0.090 0.079 0.065 0.062 0.053 0.037 0.042 0.035 0.017 0.012 0.006 0.005 0.001 260 0.127 0.091 0.058 0.043 0.034 0.028 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.010 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 270 0.099 0.078 0.066 0.057 0.055 0.045 0.044 0.036 0.032 0.033 0.018 0.008 0.005 0.003 0.001 280 0.065 0.051 0.031 0.024 0.021 0.017 0.012 0.010 0.007 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 290 0.036 0.028 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 300 0.022 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 310 0.010 0.008 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 320 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 330 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 340 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 350 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-38]
Figure 3.7 (A): Guassian Plume Model for SO 2:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-39]
Figure 3.7(B) Air Quality Contour for SO2:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-40]
TABLE NO. 3.7 (E) RESULTS FOR PM GAS
DIRECTION DISTANCE (Meters) (DEGREES) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
360 0.003 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 10 0.002 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 30 0.011 0.015 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 40 0.018 0.024 0.016 0.015 0.018 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.015 0.015 0.000 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.000 50 0.021 0.025 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.020 0.015 0.018 0.016 0.013 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.001 0.001 60 0.023 0.027 0.021 0.016 0.016 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 70 0.019 0.026 0.020 0.016 0.014 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.000 80 0.015 0.024 0.019 0.014 0.008 0.009 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.000 90 0.010 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002
100 0.011 0.025 0.018 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 110 0.017 0.038 0.034 0.028 0.025 0.022 0.025 0.019 0.017 0.012 0.009 0.006 0.005 0.002 0.001 120 0.030 0.056 0.045 0.033 0.028 0.021 0.019 0.016 0.015 0.010 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 130 0.043 0.095 0.082 0.067 0.057 0.054 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.038 0.017 0.013 0.007 0.005 0.002 140 0.064 0.137 0.121 0.088 0.075 0.065 0.057 0.048 0.044 0.043 0.025 0.016 0.009 0.005 0.002 150 0.090 0.188 0.147 0.125 0.086 0.074 0.060 0.055 0.049 0.045 0.021 0.014 0.006 0.006 0.002 160 0.126 0.253 0.208 0.154 0.133 0.110 0.103 0.093 0.087 0.079 0.043 0.027 0.020 0.015 0.005 170 0.185 0.350 0.265 0.186 0.138 0.108 0.086 0.070 0.062 0.053 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.004 180 0.280 0.509 0.396 0.297 0.235 0.195 0.172 0.154 0.139 0.126 0.068 0.046 0.030 0.022 0.015 190 0.395 0.688 0.514 0.365 0.271 0.212 0.177 0.149 0.128 0.120 0.045 0.025 0.015 0.011 0.004 200 0.516 0.886 0.748 0.632 0.576 0.543 0.516 0.493 0.465 0.438 0.247 0.162 0.114 0.088 0.041 210 0.595 0.965 0.755 0.566 0.459 0.386 0.339 0.295 0.267 0.236 0.106 0.059 0.033 0.023 0.007 220 0.624 1.002 0.787 0.593 0.487 0.420 0.380 0.336 0.302 0.275 0.135 0.078 0.052 0.034 0.015
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-41]
230 0.583 0.919 0.716 0.547 0.455 0.395 0.352 0.320 0.290 0.262 0.130 0.070 0.050 0.045 0.014 240 0.467 0.748 0.562 0.408 0.318 0.261 0.218 0.192 0.163 0.156 0.066 0.036 0.025 0.018 0.006 250 0.356 0.592 0.485 0.377 0.326 0.296 0.277 0.257 0.235 0.230 0.122 0.078 0.054 0.046 0.019 260 0.275 0.457 0.349 0.249 0.188 0.153 0.125 0.106 0.091 0.082 0.033 0.017 0.010 0.009 0.004 270 0.218 0.369 0.313 0.265 0.235 0.224 0.214 0.204 0.192 0.180 0.104 0.069 0.052 0.037 0.020 280 0.146 0.248 0.192 0.142 0.120 0.092 0.079 0.065 0.058 0.055 0.023 0.012 0.008 0.006 0.003 290 0.085 0.145 0.115 0.083 0.080 0.065 0.055 0.047 0.045 0.041 0.022 0.015 0.008 0.007 0.002 300 0.047 0.077 0.062 0.047 0.037 0.040 0.028 0.025 0.021 0.017 0.007 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.001 310 0.024 0.036 0.030 0.025 0.015 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.000 320 0.011 0.022 0.015 0.014 0.011 0.008 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 330 0.004 0.011 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 340 0.003 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 350 0.003 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-42]
Figure 3.8 (A): Guassian Plume Model for PM:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-43]
Figure 3.8(B) Air Quality Contour for PM:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-44]
3.7 WATER ENVIRONMENT
3.7.1 Design of Network for Water Sampling Locations:
The water quality status in the impact zone is assessed through a network of water quality
sampling locations. The baseline studies for water environment include identification of
specific parameters of the pollutants prior to implementation of the project. The Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) study requires monitoring of baseline water quality during one
season. Physico-chemical parameters have been analyzed to ascertain the baseline status of
fresh water in the existing surface water and ground water bodies. Samples were collected once
during the study period for winter season on December 2010 & February 2011.
The baseline status of the water environment is assessed through a systematic water quality
surveillance program, which is planned based on the following criteria:
Densely populated areas within the region.
Location of the surrounding industries.
Representation of regional background.
3.7.2 Reconnaissance:
Reconnaissance was undertaken to establish the baseline status of the air environment in the
study region. Five nos. of water sampling locations were selected within the study area of 10
Km radial distance from the project site.
3.7.3 Methodology for Ground Water and Surface Water Sampling:
The ground and surface water sampling was carried out as per the prescribed sampling
guidelines and analysis standards of CPCB for water sampling and analysis. Ground water
sampling was carried out at 5 different locations & surface water sampling was carried out
from 6 different sites out of which 4 sampling locations were nearby pond and 2 samples was
taken of river Purna and Ambika river
There will be only domestic waste water generation which will be allowed in u/g soak pit
system. There shall be no industrial waste water generation. Thus, there shall be no any
possibility towards contact of waste water with soil or land neither it impacts ground water
strata.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-45]
The details of surface and ground water sampling locations are given in Table 3.8. And
sampling locations of water quality monitoring are shown in Figure 3.9. The Physico-chemical
characteristics of the different water samples are present in the Tables 3.9 (A-C)
Table 3.8 DETAILS OF WATER MONITORING LOCATIONS
Sr.
No.
Name of village bearing
W.R.T. Project site
Approximate
Radial distance
From project
Site (km)
Direction
From project
Site
1. Project Site (W1) 0.0 -
2. Asthagam Village (W2) 3.2 ENE
3. Bhulafalia (W3) 5.8 ESE
4. Khadsupa (W4) 4.4 SWS
5. Unn (W5) 1.4 NWN
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-46]
Figure 3.9 LOCATION OF WATER SAMPLING STATION
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-47]
Table 3.9 (A): GROUND WATER QUALITY
Sr.
No. Parameters Units
IS 10500 Standard Limits for
drinking water Locations
Desirable
limit Permissible limit
Project
Site (W1)
Asthagam
(W2)
Bhula-
Falia
(W3)
Khadsupa
(W4)
Unn
(W5)
01. pH pH Scale 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 7.89 7.54 8.1 7.75 7.88
02. Temperature °C NS NS 27 30 29 27 29
03. Turbidity NTU 5 10 4.4 4.2 5.8 3.7 4.6
04. Mg. Hardness mg/ lit NS NS 218 250 206 135 123
05. Tot. Alkalinity mg/ lit 200 600 220 290 520 281 279
06. Chloride mg/ lit 250 1000 41.6 36.8 18.2 33.4 32.8
07. Sulphate mg/ lit 200 400 6.06 36.4 6.09 30 50.1
08. Nitrate mg/ lit 50 50 0.17 1.4 1.6 1.34 1.29
09. Fluoride mg/ lit 1.0 1.5 0.75 0.74 0.46 0.79 0.77
10. Sodium mg/ lit NS NS 170 145 234 229 160
11. Potasium mg/ lit NS NS 30 40 30 42 18
12. Salinity mg/ lit NS NS 75.1 66.5 32.8 60.4 59.2
13. Total Nitrogen mg/ lit NS NS 10.8 14.7 14.4 11.8 18.2
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-48]
14. Total Phosphorus mg/ lit NS NS 1.34 1.6 0.98 1.65 0.84
15. DO mg/ lit NS NS 3.77 4.9 2.50 2.95 3.35
16. BOD mg/ lit NS NS <4.0 4.0 4.0 <4.0 4.0
17. COD mg/ lit NS NS 8.0 18.0 14.0 < 4 18.0
18. Phenol mg/ lit 0.001 0.002 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
19. Lead mg/ lit 0.05 0.05 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
20. Total Chromium mg/ lit 0.05 0.05 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
21. Iron mg/ lit 0.3 1.0 0.12 0.11 0.06 0.2 0.167
22. Copper mg/ lit 0.05 1.5 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
23. Zinc mg/ lit 5 15 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.12
24. TDS mg/ lit 500 2000 734 746 488 1280 974
25. Conductivity µmhos/cm NS NS 1394 1416 927 2432 1812
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-49]
Table 3.9 (B): SURFACE WATER QUALITY
Parameters Unit
Locations
Bhula
Falia
Pond
Asthagam
Pond
Khadsupa
Pond
Unn
Pond
Purna
River
Ambika
River
pH pH scale 8.1 7.4 7.9 8.2 8.28 8.21
DO mg/lit 5.6 4.5 5.1 5.3 5.39 5.82
COD mg/lit 8.2 10.4 16.0 14.3 24 27
BOD mg/lit < 4.0 < 4.0 5.12 4.72 6.28 8.16
Free NH4 mg/lit 0.58 0.46 0.60 0.60 0.66 0.33
Boron mg/lit -- -- -- -- -- --
Sodium
Absorption
Ratio
--
1.25 1.56 1.38 1.1 1.18 1.28
Conductivity µmhos/cm 608 589 640 728 666 670
TDS mg/lit 338 310 346 404 360 352
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-50]
Table 3.9 (C): LIMITS FOR SURFACE WATER
Sr.
No. Parameters Unit
Minimum Quality specified by CPCB for
Qualification of a Particular River Stretch to
Satisfy The Use Classifications
A B C D E
1. Total Carbon mg/l NS NS NS NS NS
2. pH pH scale 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.0 to 9.0 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5
3. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 6.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 NS
4. BOD at 20°C mg/l 2.0 3.0 3.0 NS NS
5. Sodium Absorption
Ratio (SAR) mg /gm NS NS NS NS 26 (Max)
6. Boron as B mg/l NS NS NS NS 2
7. Electrical
conductivity µ mhos /cm NS NS NS NS 2250
8. Free Ammonia as N mg/l NS NS NS 1.2 NS
9. Total Coliform MPN/100 ml 50 500 5000 - -
Classification of river waters as per their intended use :
A- Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after disinfection
B- Out door bathing (organised)
C- Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfection
D- Propagation of wildlife, fisheries
E- Irrigation, industrial cooling, controlled waste disposal
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-51]
3.7.4 Baseline Ground Water Quality
pH of ground water samples varies from 7.54 – 8.1 DO are found in the range of 2.50 – 4.9
mg/L. Mg. hardness (as CaCO3) varies from 123-250 mg/L. Chloride and Sulfates are found in
the range of 18.2-41.6 and 6.06-50.1 mg/L respectively. TDS are found in the range of 488-
1280 mg/L.
3.8 AMBIENT NOISE MONITORING
Industrialization, urbanization, construction activities etc., have a direct bearing on the noise
level of the surrounding environment pertaining to such activities. Noise intensity beyond
certain tolerable limits may interfere with communication in work, apart from causing
annoyance and health hazards. Impact of noise on environment depends on various factors
such as intensity distance from source, time of exposure and nature of activities, machineries,
traffic etc. Hence, it is necessary to measure the ambient noise levels in order to determine the
environmental impact so that appropriate measures could be adopted if needed to abate noise
pollution.
The main objective of noise monitoring in the study area is to establish the baseline noise
levels, and assess the impact of the total noise that is expected to be generated during the
construction, and operation of the proposed project activities. Noise monitoring has been
undertaken for 3 hr interval at each location.
Noise monitoring was carried out to establish ambient noise levels in the study area. The
details of the sampling stations are given below in the Table 3.10 and their locations area are
shown in Figure 3.10
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-52]
Table 3.10 DETAILS OF NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS
Sr.
No.
Name of village bearing
W.R.T. Project site
Approximate radial
distance from project
site
(km)
Direction from
project site
1. Project Site (N1) 0.0 -
2. Asthagam Village (N2) 3.2 ENE
3. Bhulafalia (N3) 5.8 ESE
4. Khadsupa (N4) 4.4 SWS
5. Unn (N5) 1.4 NWN
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-53]
Figure 3.10 LOCATION OF NOISE MONITORING
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-54]
The noise level data at various locations are as mentioned in Table 3.11.
Table 3.11 NOISE LEVEL DATA
Unit: dB (A): 3 Hours
Sr.
No. Sampling Location
Recording
Time(Recording
interval – 3hrs)
Sound Level
dB(A)
Avg.
dB(A)
1. Project Site (N1) Day 63.2 55.7 60.4 58.3 59.4
Night 63.4 57.8 59.2 70.2 62.7
2. Asthagam Village
(N2)
Day 53.3 62.9 58.4 55.6 57.6
Night 51.6 53.9 56.4 55.3 54.3
3. Bhulafalia (N3) Day 54.3 50.8 51.4 54.2 52.7
Night 50.2 49.8 64.7 51.2 54.0
4. Khadsupa (N4) Day 65.5 68.3 62.6 59.8 64.1
Night 68.3 65.0 69.3 61.2 66.0
5. Unn (N5) Day 50.5 65.8 51.5 55.3 55.8
Night 52.7 53.2 50.5 53.1 52.4
Area Code
Category of Area/Zone
Limits in dB(A) Leq *
Day Time Night Time
(A) Industrial area 75 70
(B) Commercial area 65 55
(C) Residential area 55 45
(D) Silence Zone 50 40
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-55]
3.9 SOIL QUALITY MONITORING
Soil samples were collected from Five different locations during winter season on January 17,
2011 in the study area (0-20 cm depth). The locations selected for collection of soil samples are
shown in Figure 3.11 and presented in Table 3.12. The analysis results of soil samples are
given in Table 3.14.
3.9.1 Soil Classification
Following Table 3.13 provides the soil type and area under different soils within the project
area.
3.9.2 Method of Preparation
The soil classification map has been prepared by extracting the areas under different soil
categories from the 1:500,000 scale maps prepared by National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land
use Planning (NBSS & LUP). The maps were scanned and geo-referenced before taking out the
information for the desired site. The study area, towns and village locations have been added for
ease of special reference.
Table 3.12 DETAILS OF SOIL MONITORING LOCATIONS
Sr.
No.
Name of village bearing
W.R.T. Project site
Approximate radial
distance from
project site (km)
Direction from
project site
1. Project Site (S1) 0.0 -
2. Asthagam Village (S2) 3.2 ENE
3. Bhulafalia (S3) 5.8 ESE
4. Khadsupa (S4) 4.4 SWS
5. Unn (S5) 1.4 NWN
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-56]
FIGURE - 3.11 LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLING STATION
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-57]
Table 3.13 SOIL CLASSIFICATION
CATEGORY REMARKS AREA_SQKM
DESCRIPTION
TAXONOMY1
TAXONOMY2
CLASS SUB_CLASS
Category D
4.48
Moderately deep, moderately well
drained, fine soils on nearly level
alluvial plain with slight erosion and
moderate salinity; associated with
very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous, fine soils with slight
erosion and slight salinity
Fine,
montmorillonitic,
isohyperthermic
Typic
Chromusterts
Fine,
montmorillonitic,
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Udic Chromusterts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
ALLUVIAL
PLAINS
Category E 97.80
Very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous, very fine soils on nearly
level plain with slight erosion and
slight salinity; associated with very
deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous, fine soils on very gently
sloping lands with slight erosion and
Very-fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic
Chromusterts
Fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
hyperthermic,
Vertic Ustochrepts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
ALLUVIAL
PLAINS
Category F 9.41
Very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous, very fine soil on nearly
level plain with slight erosion and
moderate salinity associated with
very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous, very fine soils on very
gently sloping lands with slight
erosion
Very-fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Udic Chromusterts
Fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Udic Chromusterts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
ALLUVIAL
PLAINS
Category H 74.76
Very deep, imperfectly, drained,
calcareous fine soils, nearly level
coastal plain with slight erosion and
very strong salinity; associted with
very deep moderately well drained,
calcareous, fine soils with slight
erosion and moderate salinity
Fine, mixed
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic Halaquepts
Fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic
Chromusterts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
COASTAL
PLAINS
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-58]
Category I 58.06
Deep, poorly drained, calcareous,
fine soils on nearly level coastal plain
with slight erosion and very strong
salinity; associated with very deep,
poorly drained, calcareous, fine soils
with slight erosion and strong salinity
Fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Vertic Halaquepts
Fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic Halaquepts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
COASTAL
PLAINS
Category J 53.52
Very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous fine soils on nearly level
coastal plain with slight erosion and
very strong salinity; associated with
very deep, moderately well drained,
calcareous fine loamy soils on very
gently sloping lands with modera
Fine, mixed
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic Ustropepts
Fine-loamy mixed
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic Ustropepts
SOILS OF WEST
COAST (SOILS
OF GUJARAT
PLAIN)
SOILS OF
COASTAL
PLAINS
Category K Sea Beach Or
River Bed 7.43
Fine,
montmorillonitic,
isohyperthermic
Typic
Chromusterts
Category L Mud 8.48
Very-fine,
montmorillonitic
(calcareous),
isohyperthermic
Typic
Chromusterts
(Courtesy: Environmental Information Centre, New Delhi)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-59]
Table 3.14 PHYSICO CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF SOIL
Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Locations
Project Site Astgam Bhula Falia Khadsupa Un
1. pH pH Unit 6.72 7.0 7.7 7.2 7.4
2. TDS mg/kg 1212 1460 1652 1444 1702
3. Calcium mg/kg 124 88 137 145 120
4. Magnesium mg/kg 39 47 48 48 40
5. Potassium mg/kg 30 23 31 35 35
6. Sodium mg/kg 89 58 82 70 69
7. Zinc mg/kg Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace
8. Copper mg/kg Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace
9. Lead mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND
10. Iron mg/kg 0.04 0.07 0.16 0.06 0.04
11. Nickel mg/kg Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace
12. Phosphate mg/kg 0.11 0.18 0.17 0.14 0.16
13. Porosity % 46.3 42.7 41.7 42.8 41.4
14. Water handling
capacity
% 37 36.0 44 42 46
15. Chloride mg/kg 85 75.0 95 85 110
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-60]
16. Sulphate mg/kg 82 62.0 55 50 50
17. Nitrate mg/kg 14 16.0 12 18 24
18. Organic Matter mg/kg 1.7 1.18 1.24 1.17 1.15
19. Bulk Density g/cc 1.42 1.41 1.45 1.45 1.44
PARTICAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION
20. Gravel % 13 17 11 16 14
Coarse Sand % 8 8 9 9 7
Medium sand % 9 9 7 16 5
Fine Sand % 7 10 6 7 8
Silt % 37 26 27 30 34
Clay % 29 32 30 28 27
Sp. Gravity % 2.56 2.43 2.67 2.50 2.22
22. Sodium Absorption
Ratio
-- 0.84 1.76 1.53 1.24 1.30
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-61]
3.9.3 Baseline Soil Quality
PH varies from 6.72 – 7.7. TDS varies from 1212-1702 mg/kg. Calcium and Magnesium are
found in the range of 88-145 mg/kg and 39-48 mg/kg respectively. Potassium and Sodium are
found in the range of 23-35 mg/kg and 58-89 mg/kg respectively. Zinc, Copper and Lead are
found BDL mg/kg respectively. Iron and Nickel are found in range of 0.04-0.16 mg/kg and BDL
mg/kg respectively. Lead is not detectable in any sample. Phosphates are found in the range
0.11-0.18 mg/Kg Porosity and Water Holding Capacity is found in the range of 41.4% - 46.3%
and 36% - 46% respectively. Chloride, sulphates and Nitrate are found in the range 75-110
mg/Kg, 50-82 mg/Kg and 12-24 mg/Kg respectively. Organic Matter was found in the range of
1.15-1.7. Bulk Density varies from 1.41 – 1.45 gm/cm3.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-62]
LAND USE PATTERN, BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENT
3.10 LAND USE PATTERN
As per the statistical record of census handbook the extent of land area under use for various
activities in study area can be summarized as follows
The likely landuse within the study area is determined. The study area contains forestland,
irrigated agricultural land, unirrigated agricultural land, cultivable wasteland and area not
available for cultivation. There are total of 06 villages’ falls within 5.0 km radius from the
project site. The total area studied is about 10232.1 hectares.
Land use, in general, reflects the human beings activities on land, whereas the word land cover
indicates the vegetation, agricultural and artificial manmade structures covering the land
surfaces. Identification and periodic surveillance of land uses and vegetation covers, in the
vicinity of any developmental activity is one of the most important components for an
environmental impact assessment, which would help determine the impact of the project
development activity on the land use pattern.
The land use classification within a distance of ten kilometers from the project location and the
areas falling under the respective classifications are as per the following Table 3.15 & Figure
3.12 shows its graphical representation.
Table 3.15 AREAS UNDER DIFFERENT LANDUSE
Sr.
No.
Land use classification Area (ha), within 10 km
of project location
Percentage of total
area
1. Forest - -
2. Irrigated by source 6884.05 67.27
3. Unirrigated
2077.40
20.30
4. Cultivable waste land
438.80
4.28
5. Area not available for
cultivation
782.20
7.64
6. Urban Area
49.65 0.51
Total
10232.1
100.00
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-63]
Figure 3.12 LAND USE PATTERN WITHIN STUDY AREA
LAND USE PATTERN OF STUDY AREA
0.00%
67.27%
20.30%
4.28%
7.64%
0.51%
Forest
Irrigated by source
Unirrigated
Culturable waste land
Area not available forcultivationUrban Area
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-64]
3.11 GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE
The geology of the entire Gujarat has been shown in Figure 3.13
Figure 3.13 GEOLOGY OF GUJARAT
FIGURE 3.13: GEOLOGY OF GUJARAT
The geology of the study area consists of Alluvium, Blown sand, millolite sand, Basalts andesite,
trachyte flows, Laterite, Bauxite, Gypsiferous clays and Sandy limestone.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-65]
3.12 HYDROLOGY
Ground water is mainly in the sand sections. Underground water level is comparatively low in
the area. The groundwater depth is 20.0-25.0 m below ground level in the Study area. The
Figure 3.14 shows the ground water level of Gujarat state.
Figure 3.14 GROUND WATER LEVEL OF GUJARAT STATE
FIGURE 3.14: GROUND WATER LEVEL IN GUJARAT
3.13 PHYSIOGRAPHY
The District Surat forms a part of Gujarat Plain and is further sub-divided in to seven sub-micro
regions namely Khambhat coast, Mangrol Plain, Umarpada Forested Upland, Tapi Basin,
Mindhola Purna Plain, Kalakakara Hills, and Chorasi-Palsana Coastal Plain on the basis of
Topography, climate, geology, soils and natural vegetations.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-66]
3.14 FOREST BOUNDARIES
The forest cover is classified based on Forest Survey of India into Dense (> 40% crown density),
open (between 10 to 40 % crown density) and Scrubs (shrubby bush of less than 10 % crown
density). The vegetation classification criterion used for this study area is given as follows:
Dense Vegetation is the lands with forest cover with canopy density of equal or more than 40
percent.
Medium Vegetation is the land with forest cover with canopy density of 10 to 40 percent.
Open Vegetation is the land with forest cover with canopy density less than 10 percent.
Scrubs are the lands generally in and around forest areas, having bushes and/or poor tree growth
chiefly of small or stunted trees with a canopy density less than 10 percent.
3.14.1 Method of Preparation
The vegetation cover for the area of interest has been prepared by extracting the areas under four
different vegetation classification provided by the Forest Survey of India (FSI) based on IRS-ID
LISS III data for the past two years for the State of Gujarat. There is no Reserved Forests and
Protected Forests within the 10 km radius area from project site. The project site and area of
interest have been added for ease of special reference.
3.14.2 Map of Vegetation Classification and Forest Boundaries
A layers of vegetation classification, and town and village locations and the Area Statistic is
given in Table 3.16
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-67]
Table 3.16 AREA STATISTIC OF FOREST MAP
Area Statistics of Forest Map
Sr. No.
Class Name Area (In
Hectares) Area (In Sq.
Km.) Percentage
1. Water Body 23998.81 239.99 12.24
2. Non Vegetation Area 152894.59 1528.95 78
3. Mangrove(Sparse) 2.88 0.03 0.0015
4. Mangrove(Dense) 19.53 0.20 0.01
5. Open/Degraded Vegetation 4410.66 44.11 2.25
6. Vegetation Low Density 11376.46 113.76 5.8
7. Vegetation High Density 450.89 4.51 0.23
8. Scrubs 2792.6208 27.93 1.42
Total 195946.44 1959.46 100
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-68]
3.15 FLORA
Table 3.17 Flora Found in the Area
Botanical Name Common Name Family Acacia auriculiformis Australian acacia Acacia catechu khair Acacia nilotica Babul Adina cordifolia Albizia lebbeck Shirish Alianthus excelsa Ajan Anogeissus latifolia Artiplex stocksii Chinopodiaceae Artocarpus heterophyllus Azadirachta indica neem Bambusa arundinaceae Bamboo Bauhinia tomentosa Kachhar _ Boerhavia diffusa Lalsata Nyctaginaceae Bombax ceiba Silk cotton Bombacaceae Bougainvillea glabra Bougainvillea Calotropis procera Ak Cassia fistula Amaltash Cassia siamea Karamala Casurina equisetifolia Saru Cocos nucifera Narial Cyperus esculentus Cyperaceae Dalbergia latifolia Pahari sheesham Dalbergia sissoo Sheesham Delonix elata Gamhar Dendro calamus strictus Bass Desmodium heterocarpon Papilionaceae Diospyros chloroxylon Ebenaceae Diospyros melanoxylum Tendu Emlic officinalis Amla Eucalyptus Nilgiri Ficus bengalensis Bargad Ficus religiosa Peepal Garcinia xanthochymus Bottle brush Gmelina arborea Shivan Hibiscus sabdariffa Lalambadi Hibiscus schizopetalus Jaswand Lagerstroemia parviflora Dhuara Lythraceae Lannea coromandelica Lindernia hyssopioides Scrophulariaceae Lycium barbarum Solanaceae Madhuca indica Mahua Mangifera indica Aam Millingtonia hortensis Akashneem Mimosa hamata Mimosaceae Mitragyna parvifolia Moriga oelifera Shevga Nerium indicum Kaner
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-69]
Orobanche cernua Scrophulariaceae Ougenia dalbergioides Oxalis corniculata Nalvari Oxalidaceae Parkinsonia aculeata Keerar Physalis longifolia Solanaceae Pithacellobium dulce Jangli Jilebi Momosaceae Pithecolobium saman Raintree Pongamia pinnate Kanji Prosopis juliflora Vilayati Babul Psilostachys seriea Amranthaceae Pterocarpus marsupium Rauvolfia tetrafylla Apocynaceae Ricinus communis Eranda Saraca indica Asoka Szygium cumini Jamun Tabernaemontana coronaria Tagar Tamarindus indica Imli Tamarix troupii Tamaricaceae Tectona grandis Sagwan Terminalia arjuna Arjun Terminalia bellerica Behda Terminalia catappa Deshibadam Terminalia crenulata Terminalia paniculata Thespesia populnea Jaswand Typha angustata Patera Vernonia anthelmintica Asteraceae Vitex negundo Shivarii Zyzyphus mauritiana Ber
(Courtesy: Environmental Information Centre, New Delhi)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-70]
3.16 FAUNA
Some Common Fauna of the project area are given Below in Table 3.18
Common Name Scientific Name Family Mammals Indian hare Lepus nigricollis Leporidae Jackel Canis aureus Canidae
Jungle cat Felis chaus Felidae Smothcoated Indian Otter Lutra perspicillata Mustelidae
Indian wild boar Sas scorfa Suidae Birds
Barn Owl Tyto alba Strigidae
Baya Plocsus philippinus Bengal vulture Gyps bengalensis Accipitridae
Black Drongo Dicrurus adsimils Dicruridae: Blackheaded gull Larus ridibundus Laridae
Blackwinged kite Elanus caeruleus Accipitridae Blackwinged stint Himantopus himantopus
Blue rock pegion Columba livia Columbidae Brahminy duck Tadorna ferruginea
Brahminy kite Haliastur indus Accipitridae Brahminy myna Sturnus pagodarum Sturnidae
Bronzewinged jacana Metopidius indicus Jacanidae Brownheaded gull Larus brunnicephalus Laridae
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Ardeidae Combduck Sarkidiornis melanotos Anatidae
Common coot Fulica atra Gruidae: Common Indian nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus Caprimulgidae
Common Myna Acridotheres Sturnidae Common Peafowl Pavo cristatus Phasianidae
Common Pochard Athya ferina Anatidae Common sandpiper Tringa hypoleucos Charadriidae
Common teal Anas crecca Anatidae Common tern Sterna hirundo Laridae
Coppersmith Megalaima haemacephala Capitonidae Cotton teal Nettapus coromandelianus Anatidae
Coucal Centropus sinensis Curlew Numenius arquata Charadriidae Garganey Anas querquedula Anatidae
Golden oriole Oriolus oriolus Oriolidae Green sandpiper Tringa ochropus Charadriidae
Grey heron Ardea cineria Ardeidae Grey partridge Francolinus pondicerianus Phasianidae
Grey shrike Lanius excubitor Laniidae Hoopoe Upupa epops Upupidae:
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-71]
(Courtesy: Environmental Information Centre, New Delhi)
House crow Corvus splendens Corvidae House sparrow Passer domesticus Ploceidae
House swift Apus affinis Apodidae: Indian courser Cursorius coromandelicus Glareolidae
Indian ring dove Streptopelia decaocto Columbidae Indian river tern Sterna aurantia Laridae Indian robin Saxicoloidesfulicata Muscicapidae
Indian roller Coracias benghalensis Coraciidae: Jungle babbler Turdoides striatiis Muscicapidae
Jungle bushquail Perdicula asiatica Phasianidae Koel Eudynamys scolopacea Cuculidae
Jungle owlet Glaucidium radiatum Strigidae Large egret Ardea alba Ardeidae
Lesser flamingo Phoeniconaias minor Phoenicopteridae: Lesser whistling teal Dendrocygna javanica Anatidae Little cormorant Phalacrocorax niger Phalacrocoracidae:
Little egret Egretta garzetta Ardeidae Little tern Stema albifrons Laridae White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus Pelecanidae Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo Phalacrocoracidae
Pond heron Ardeola grayii Ardeidae Smaller Egret Egretta intermedia Ardeidae
Whitenecked Stork Ciconia episcopus Ciconiidae Black ibis Pseudibis papillosa Threskiornithidae
Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus Phoenicopteridae Common babbler Turdoides caudatus Muscicapidae
Spotted dove Streptopblia chinensis Columbidae Magpie robin Copsychus saularis Muscicapidae
Marsh harrier Circus aeruginosus Accipitridae Moorhen Gallinula chloropus Gruidae:
Night heron Nycticorax nycticorax Ardeidae Painted stork Mycteria leucocephala Ciconiidae
Palm swift Cypsiurus parvus Apodidae: Pariah kite Milvus migrans govinda Accipitridae
Pheasant tailed jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus Jacanidae Pied crested cuckoo Clamatoriacobinus Cuculidae
Pied kingfisher Ceryle rudis Alcedinidae Reptiles
House gecko Hemidactyles alaviviridis Gekkonidae
Common skink Mabuya carinata Scincidae Common Indian monitor lizard Varanus benglensis Varanidae Saw scaled viper Echis carinatus Viperidae Krait Bangarus caeruleus Elapidae Cobra Naja naja Elapidae
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-72]
3.17 DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE (CENSUS 2001)
There are total 27 villages (Rural and Urban) falls within 10 km radius of the project site. The
demographic and socio economic profile has been presented below. The four major indicators
viz. demography, civic amenities, economy and social culture. The baseline status of the above
indicators is compiled in forthcoming sections.
3.17.1 Method of Data Preparation
The Census District Book, Map has been used to identify the settlements at various distances from
the project site and compile the demographic data as per the requirement of environmental
clearance questionnaire for different distance bands from the projec t site.
3.17.2 Demographic Data within the Region of Interest
Table 3.19 provides the data on inhabitations falling within 500 m, between 500 m and 5 km,
between 5 km and 10 km distance from the project site.
On an average, Taluka Navsari has population density of about 650.43 persons per sq. km. (2001
Census data), Taluka Jalalpore has population density of about 446.41 persons per sq. km. (2001
Census data), Taluka Gandevi has population density of about 815.23 persons per sq. km. (2001
Census data) compared to the Navsari District, which has a population density of about 556.57
persons per sq. km. (2001 Census data), Population density within 10 km radius of the site is
only 542.25 persons per sq. km. (2001 Census data), while population density within 5 km radius
of site is 500.7 persons per sq. km. (2001 Census data). The population details (i.e. population
distribution and population density) of the Taluka Navsari, Taluka Jalalpore, Taluka Gandevi,
District Navsari and the study area within 10 km radius and 5 km radius are given in Table 3.20.
And their graphical representations are shown in Figure 3.15 & 3.16
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-73]
Table 3.19 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA (CENSUS – 2001)
SR. NO. TOWN / VILLAGE NO. OF HOUSEHOLD
POPULATION
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
WITHIN 500 M FROM PROJECT SITE
0 None Nil Nil Nil Nil
WITHIN 500 M TO 5 KM FROM PROJECT SITE
1 KACHHOL 219 524 519 1043 2 UN 247 651 671 1322 3 WADA 295 702 709 1411 4 MUNSAD 732 1534 1508 3042 5 SISODRA 1618 3945 3700 7645 6 NASILPORE 240 602 582 1184
WITHIN 5 KM TO 10 KM FROM PROJECT SITE (TALUKA NAVSARI)
1 HANSAPOR 522 1185 1097 2282 2 DAMBHER 326 741 716 1457 3 PINJRA 104 241 236 477 4 ADADA 475 1180 1092 2227 5 CHAN. SUPA 496 1097 1033 2130 6 KHADSUPA 656 1416 1389 2805 7 BHULA FALIA 519 1133 1193 2326 8 ASHTAGAM 629 1419 1394 2813 9 SADLAV 354 848 877 1725
10 ITALVA 553 1241 1191 2432 11 VASAR 156 390 381 771 12 DANDESAR 251 571 573 1144 13 BHATTAI 240 583 532 742 14 ONCHI 291 725 684 1409 15 MOLDHARA 434 984 1018 2002 16 VIRWADI 642 253 261 514 17 DHARAGIRI 333 1706 1344 3050 18 TIGHRA 1501 713 644 1357 19 CHHAPRA 206 3493 3116 6609 20 DANTEJ 124 459 467 926 21 PARTAPORE 642 331 307 638
URBAN AREA (TALUKA NAVSARI) 1 SISODRA 1618 3945 3700 7645 2 CHHAPRA 1501 3493 3116 6609
WITHIN 5 KM TO 10 KM FROM PROJECT SITE (TALUKA JALALPORE) 1 NONE Nil Nil Nil Nil
WITHIN 5 KM TO 10 KM FROM PROJECT SITE (TALUKA GANDEVI) 1 NONE Nil Nil Nil Nil
(Courtesy: Census Dept., GOI, Census Book 2001)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-74]
Table 3.20 POPULATION DENSITY
Name Population
(Persons)
Population
Density
(Person / sq. km.)
Sex ratio
(No. of females per
1000 males)
Within 5 km Radius
(2001)
15647 500.70 966.19
Within 10 km Radius
(2001)
55483 542.25 950.01
Taluka Navsari
(2001)
51267 555.43 950.37
Taluka Jalalpore
(2001)
3739 428.78 941.33
Taluka Gandevi
(2001)
477 361.36 979.25
District Navsari
(2001)
1229463 556.00 954.00
(Courtesy: Census Dept., GOI, Census Book 2001)
Figure 3.15 MALE & FEMALE WITHIN STUDY AREA
MALE & FEMALE WITHIN STUDY AREA
51.40%48.60% MALE %Female %
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-75]
Figure 3.16 POPULATION DENSITY & SEX RATIO
500.7546.33 555.43
428.78
361.36
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
POPU
LATI
ON
DEN
SITY
Series1
Series1 500.7 546.33 555.43 428.78 361.36
WITHIN 5 KM
WITHIN 10 KM
TA. NAVSARI
TAL. JALALPO
RE
TAL. GANDEVI
Sex ratio (No. of female per 1000 male)
966.19
950.01 950.37941.33
979.25
920
930
940
950
960
970
980
990
SEX
RA
TIO
Series1
Series1 966.19 950.01 950.37 941.33 979.25
WITHIN 5 KM
WITHIN 10 KM
TAL. NAVSAR
TAL. JALALP
TAL. GANDEV
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-76]
3.17.3 Literacy Rate
The literacy rate is a major factor, which influences the socio-cultural condition of a particular
place. Details of literacy rate in District Navsari, Taluka Navsari, Taluka Gandevi, Taluka
Jalalpore and within 10 km radius and 5 km radius of project site are given in Table 3.21 while
their graphical representation is shown in Figure 3.17. It is observed that the literacy rate in
Navsari District, as per 2001 Census data is 75.8 %, with 82.8 % among male and 68.6 % among
female. Literacy rate in Taluka Navsari as per 2001 Census data is 79.0 % with 84.6 % among
males and 73.0 % among females. Literacy rate in Taluka Gandevi as per 2001 Census data is
83.2 % with 88.7 % among males and 77.5 % among females. Literacy rate in Taluka Jalalpore
as per 2001 Census data is 82.1 % with 87.4 % among males and 76.5 % among females.
Table 3.21 LITERACY RATE
Name Male Literacy
(%)
Female Literacy
(%)
Total Literacy
(%)
Within 5 km Radius (2001) 67.70 54.92 61.34
Within 10 km Radius (2001) 69.28 57.43 64.67
Taluka Navsari
(2001)
84.6 73.0 79.0
Taluka Jalalpore
(2001)
87.4 76.5 82.1
Taluka Gandevi
(2001)
88.7 77.5 83.2
District Navsari
(2001)
82.8 68.6 75.8
(Courtesy: Census Dept., GOI, Census Book 2001)
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-77]
Figure 3.17 LITERACY RATE
3.17.4 Occupational Structure
There is a large diversity in the occupational pattern in the study area. In Rural, majority of the
people are engaged in agricultural activities, forestry and allied activities.
Major activities in Urban areas include industrial employment, Trade and Commerce, Livestock,
Business, Construction, Transport and Communication network, Engineering profession, Service
centers, Technical and Medical services and others.
This wide diversity in occupational structure may be broadly categorized as working and non-
working population. The Table 3.22 shows total culturer, agriculturer, household, main workers,
marginal workers and non-workers and the Figure 3.18 is the graphical representation of the
total numbers of workers in each category.
LITERACY RATE
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
LITE
RA
CY
%
MALE %FEMALE %TOTAL %
MALE % 67.70 69.28 67.94 75.69 88.80FEMALE % 54.39 57.43 56.03 64.72 76.27TOTAL % 61.34 63.46 63.45 70.37 82.60
Within 5 Km
Within 10 Km
Tal. Navsari
Tal. Jalalpore
Tal. Gandevi
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-78]
Table 3.22 OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE (2001 DATA)
OCCUPATIONAL PATTERN IN VILLAGES FALLING UNDER AREA OF
INTEREST - 2001 S.NO Name of
Village Occupational Pattern
Cultivator Agriculture Household
Industries
Other
Worker
Marginal
Workers
Non
Workers
TALUKA NAVSARI 1 ADADA 115 526 22 372 21 1216 2 CHAN. SUPA 194 527 -- 263 43 1103 3 KACHHOL 69 166 -- 140 -- 668 4 KHADSUPA 86 475 04 209 731 1300 5 BHULA FALIA 127 700 01 190 31 1277 6 ASHTAGAM 166 560 03 204 488 1392 7 SADLAV 128 658 -- 136 02 801 8 UN 47 345 -- 162 51 716 9 ITALVA 72 257 03 607 215 1278
10 WADA 95 338 -- 174 01 803 11 VASAR 56 278 -- 57 -- 380 12 MUNSAD 115 1261 -- 195 210 1261 13 DANDESAR 74 353 -- 82 24 611 14 BHATTAI 25 287 03 192 09 599 15 ONCHI 185 178 01 339 34 672 16 MOLDHARA 36 434 08 284 33 1207 17 VIRWADI 10 180 -- 70 08 246 18 SISODRA 148 1570 127 1506 245 4049 19 NASILPORE 70 158 -- 243 08 705 20 DHARAGIRI 18 378 04 769 73 1808 21 TIGHRA 43 01 05 154 496 658 22 CHHAPRA 59 380 114 1984 127 3945 23 DANTEJ 56 156 02 172 05 535 24 PARTAPORE 72 27 01 106 02 430
Urban Area 1 SISODRA 148 1570 127 1506 245 4049 2 CHHAPRA 59 380 114 1984 127 3945
TAUKA JALALPORE 1 HANSAPOR 127 285 23 355 121 1371 2 DAMBHER 136 167 07 199 113 835
TAUKA GANDEVI 1 PINJRA 68 75 -- 59 -- --
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-79]
Figure 3.18 WORKERS CATEGORIZATION
4.31%
19.27%
0.59%
16.58%
5.56%
53.69%
WORKERS CATEGORIZATION
CULTIVATORAGRICULTUREHOUSE HOLD IND.OTHER WORKERMARGINAL WORKERNON WORKER
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-80]
3.18 PUBLIC AMENITIES
Infrastructure resource base of the surveyed villages with reference to education, medical, water
resources, post and telegraph, communication, power supply is presented in Table 3.23.There
are 27 villages within study area of 10 km radius of plant site. Significant observations with
respect to availability of amenities in study area are as follows.
All of the villages have primary schools; within the distance of 10 km radius we have total 27
number of primary school, 5 higher secondary education schools. 1 Senior Secondary School.
Within the 10 km Radius apart from the Education Facilities there is also the Medical facilities
which Include 27 Hospital, 27 Primary Health Centre, 27 Maternity and Child Welfare, 12
number of Primary health sub-centre, 7 registered private practitioners while 9 family welfare
centre,4 Community Health worker, 1 Dispensary, 1 others are also available in the impact zone.
In the study area drinking water facilities are good as tap water and well water is available
almost in all the villages, 25 Tap water facilities are available around the Village, 25 hand
pumps, 23 Well water, 04 Tube well Water, 16 Tank water is available around the 10 Km
Radius, 11 Canal, 6 from River and 2 from other resources.
There are 27 Post office facilities, 688 telephones Connection, 2 posts and telegraph facility.
Villages are well connected through a network of Pucca road and Kaccha approach road. Bus is
the main mode of transportation and railway is the another important mode of transportation.
All the villages get electricity for all purpose i.e. domestic, agriculture and industrial.
The Table 3.23 below shows the details of amenities available in study area.
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-81]
Table 3.23 DETAILS OF AMMENITIES AVAILABLE IN STUDY AREA
TALUKA VILLAGE EDUCATIONAL MEDICAL DRINKING
WATER
POST &
TELEGRAPH
COMMUNICATIO
N
APPROACH
TO
VILLAGE
NEAREST
TOWN
POWER
SUPPLY
NAVSARI
ADADA P(2)
C(<5)
MCW(5-10)
PHS
FWC
H(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
T
W
HP
TK
R
C
PO
PH(10+)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-5 EA
CHANDAVADAN SUPA
P
C(10+)
H(10+)
MCW(<5)
PHC(<5)
T
HP
W
TK
R
PO
PH(75)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR Navsari-10 EA
KACCHOL P
C(5-10)
H(5-10)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(10+)
T
HP
W
TK
R
C
PO
PH
BS
RS(10+) PR Navsari-9 EA
KHADSUPA P
C(10+)
PHS
RMP
H(10+)
MCW
PHC(10+)
T
W
TK
C
PO
PH(66)
BS
RS(10+)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-10 EA
BHULAFALIA P
C(10+)
H(10+)
MCW(10+)
PHC(<5)
PHS
FWC
T
HP
TW
W
TK
PO
PH(44)
PTO
BS
RS(10+)
PR
MR
Navsari-15 EA
ASHTAGAM
P(3)
S
PUC
C(5-10)
H(10+)
MCW(10+)
PHC(< 5)
PHS
FWC
T
HP
TW
W
TK
PO
PH(100)
BS
RS(10+)
PR
MR Navsari-15 EA
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-82]
SADLAV P
C(10+)
H(10+)
MCW(<5)
PHC(<5)
PHS
FWC
CHW
T
HP
W
TK
TW
R
C
PO
PH(20)
BS
RS(10+) PR Navsari-12 EA
UN P
C(5-10)
RMP
PHS
H(5-10)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(<5)
HP
W
TK
C
PH(25)
PO
BS
RS(5)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-8 EA
ITALVA P
S
C(<5)
PHS
FWC
H
D
MCW(<5)
PHC(<5)
T
HP
PO
PH(10)
BS
RS(<5)
PR
Navsari-4 EA
WADA P
C(<5)
H(<5)
MCW(<5)
PHC(<5)
T
HP
W
TK
R
C
PO
PH(<5)
BS
RS(<5)
PR
MR
Navsari-4 EA
VASAR P
C(5-10)
H(< 5)
MCW(< 5)
PHC(<5)
T
HP
W
TK
C
PO(<5)
PH(2)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-8 EA
MUNSAD P
C(5-10)
H(5-10)
MCW
PHC
PHS
T
HP
W
TK
C
PH(5)
PO
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-6 EA
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-83]
DANDESAR P
C(5-10)
H(10+)
MCW(10+)
PHC(5-10)
T
HP
W
O
PH(16)
PO(5-10)
BS
RS(10+)
PR
Navsari-10 EA
BHATTAI P
S
C(5-10)
H(10+)
MCW(10+)
PHC(5-10)
PHS
FWC
RMP(2)
T
HP
W
O
PH(12)
PO
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
Navsari-7 EA
ONCHI P(2)
C(5-10)
H(5-10)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
T
HP
O
W
PH(102)
PO
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
Navsari-8 EA
MOLDHARA P
C(5-10)
H(5-10)
PHS
FWC
MCW(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
CHW(2)
T
HP
W
TK
R
PO
PH(20)
BS
RS(5-10) PR Navsari-9 EA
VIRWADI P
C(<5)
H(<5)
MCW(<5)
PHC(5-10)
CHW
T
HP
PO(<5)
PH(2)
BS
RS(<5) PR Navsari-4 EA
SISODRA P
S
C(<5)
PHS
H(<5)
MCW(<5)
PHC(< 5)
FWC
T
HP
W
TK
C
PO
PTO
PH(7)
BS
RS(<5)
PR
FP Navsari-5 EA
NASILPORE P
C(<5)
CHW
H(<5)
MCW(<5)
PHC(5-10)
T
HP
PH(10)
PO(< 5)
BS
RS(<5) PR Navsari-4 EA
DHARAGIRI
P
S
PUC
C(5-10)
RMP
H(10+)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
T
W
PO
PH(10)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
Navsari-5 EA
M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
[3-84]
(Courtesy: Census Dept., GOI, Census Book 2001)
TIGHRA P
C(<5)
H(<5)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
T
HP
W
TK
C
PO (<5)
PH (<5)
BS
RS(< 5) PR Navsari-3 EA
CHHAPRA P
C(<5)
H(<5)
MCW(<5)
PHC(< 5)
PHS
FWC
T
HP
TW
W
TK
C
PH(105)
PO
BS
RS(<5)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-5 EA
DANTEJ P
C(<5)
H(< 5)
MCW(< 5)
PHC(< 5)
T
HP
W
PO
PH(6)
BS
RS(< 5)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-4 EA
PARTAPORE P
C(<5)
H(5-10)
MCW(5-10)
PHC(5-10)
T
HP
PO (<5)
PH(15)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
Navsari-5 EA
JALALPORE
HANSAPORE P
C(5-10)
RMP
H(5-10)
MCW(< 5)
PHC(5-10)
T
W
HP
PO
PH
BS
RS PR Vijalpore-2 EA
DUMBHER P
C(5-10)
H(10+)
MCW(10+)
PHC(< 5)
T
HP
W
TK
PH(<5)
PO
BS
RS(< 5)
PR
MR
FP
Navsari-9 EA
GANDEVI PINJRA P
C(5-10)
MCW(<5)
PHC(<5)
RMP
H(5-10)
HP
W
PO(<5)
PH(12)
BS
RS(5-10)
PR
Gandevi-7 EA