ramesh gunaratna_rnai:a molecular evolutionary perspective towards strengthening its blossoming...
DESCRIPTION
This provides a novel idea of strengthening RNAi potency and specificity by the selection pressure analysis on target sequences which will provide clues to construct more accurate and potent siRNAs.However, slides cover main areas in RNAi providing a current analysis of its applications and predicts future work based on the analysis.TRANSCRIPT
RNA interference:
By M A R T GunaratnaIndex No: 8060
Special Degree in Bioinformatics
A molecular evolutionary perspective towards strengthening its blossoming applications
11
Why the emphasis on RNA?• Molecules involved in the mechanism of
RNAi are non-protein - coded RNAs transcribed
from ‘junk DNA’• Biogenesis of miRNAs (microRNAs) that
are involved in:- Cell proliferation- Cell differentiation- Cell development- Programmed cell death- Interactions between viruses and host cells- Regulates activity of 1/3 of human protein-encoding genes
• Solution for C-value paradox / enigma
JUNK DNA TURNED OUT TO BE GOLD!!!!
22
33
44
Nuclear Membrane
55
C. elegansPetunias
Short hairpin RNA
siRNA with 3’ overhangs D. melanogaster
Craig Mellow & Andrew Fire Nobel prize 2006
Physiology or Medicine
66
Plasma Membrane
RNAi blossoming applicationsDrug discovery
Therapeutic applications
Cancer
Neurodegenerative diseases
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy & Haemophilia
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
• Research purposes• Stempeutics • Medical diagnostics
77
Neurodegenerative Diseases
AMD
Cancer
http://stemcell.taragana.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/stem-cell-therapy-india1.jpg 20.06.2009http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3210/images/02-cure-cancer.jpg 20.06.2009http://www.myvisiontest.com/img/upload/Macular_degeneration.jpg20.06.2009
88
99
Organs for which RNAi proof of concept has been demonstrated
Challenges in RNAi Efficacious delivery
Stability
Specificity
Potency
1010http://www.nature.com/gt/journal/v13/n6/fig_tab/3302654f2.html#figure-title 20.06.2009
Spurious specificity & lack of potency: causative agents
Erroneous siRNA designing algorithms leads to Brute-Force
search of siRNAs ● Activation of immune responses
Constraints in developing
longer siRNAs● Complicated
synthesis
Target sequen
ce diversit
y
● Dive
rsify
ing
or
posi
tive
● Purif
ying
or
nega
tive
● Neut
ralSelection pressure
1111
Analysis of Darwinian selection pressure
dN - Number of sites with non-synonymous substitutions
dS - Number of sites with synonymous substitutions
1212
ω = dN / dS
ω > 1 – Positive selectionω = 1 – Neutral selectionω < 1 – Negative selection Charles Darwin at the
age of 31…http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Charles-Darwin-31.jpg20.06.2009
PAML - Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Rich repertoire of advance substitution models
Utility of maximum likelihood method
Facilitates understanding of molecular evolution
1313
Getting started…
1414
Translation
Alignment of In-frame
Removal of identical sequences
Tree generation
Codon substitution modelsCODEML program package
ü ω not averaged throughout the phylogenetic tree
ü Codon is considered the evolutionary unit
1515
Branch models
Site models
Branch – Site models
Facts to be considered before proceeding…Number of sequences > 6Tree length > 0.11Number of Sequences should not be highly similar or highly diverged
1616
Parameters in site models
1717
Model NSsites
p Parameters
M0 (one ratio) 0 1 ωM1a (neutral) [N]
1 2 p0 (p1 = 1 – p0), ω0 < 1, ω1 = 1
M2a (selection) [A]
2 4 p0, p1 (p2 = 1 – p0 – p1), ω0 < 1, ω1 = 1, ω2 > 1
M3 (discrete) 3 5 p0, p1 (p2 = 1 – p0 – p1) ω0, ω1, ω2 M7 (beta) [N] 7 2 p, q
M8 (beta&ω) [A] 8 4 p0 (p1 = 1 – p0), p, q, ωs > 1
NOTE: M0 and M3 are used only to measure the variability of ω among sitesp is the number of free parameters in the ω distribution.[A] – Alternative model [N] – Null model
Parameters in Branch-site models
1818
Site class
Parameters Background
ωForeground
ω
0 p0 0 < ω0 < 1 0 < ω0 < 1
1 p1 ω1 = 1 ω1 = 1
2a (1 – p0 – p1) * p0 / (p0 + p1) 0 < ω0 < 1 ω2 ≥ 1
2b (1 – p0 – p1) * p1 / (p0 + p1) ω1 = 1 ω2 ≥ 1
NOTE: Branch-site model A is specified using model = 2 NSsites = 2. This is the alternative model in the branch-site test of positive selection. The null model fixes ω2 = 1. The likelihood ratio test has df = 1 At a particular instance;Foreground branch – Branch analyzed for positive evolutionBackground branch – Branch not analyzed for positive evolution
Control file in CODEML
1919
seqfile = xxxxx.nuc
treefile = xxxxx.trees
outfile = mlcxxxxx * main result file name
model = 2 * models for codons:
* 0:one, 1:b, 2:2 or more dN/dS ratios for branches
NSsites = 8
fix_kappa = 0 * 1: kappa fixed, 0: kappa to be estimated
kappa = 1.6 * initial or fixed kappa
fix_omega = 0 * 1: omega or omega_1 fixed, 0: estimate
omega = .8 * initial or fixed omega, for codons or codon-based
AAs
ncatG = 10 * # of categories in dG of NSsites models
getSE = 1 * 0: don't want them, 1: want S.E.s of estimates
cleandata = 0 * remove sites with ambiguity data (1:yes,
0:no)?
method = 0 * 0: simultaneous; 1: one branch at a time
CODEML results
2020
tree length = 0.52544
Model 7: beta (10 categories) lnL(ntime: 17 np: 20): -2001.404646 +0.000000 dN/dS (w) for site classes (K=10)p: 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000 0.10000w: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.20940 1.00000 1.00000 Model 8: beta&w>1 (11 categories) lnL(ntime: 17 np: 22): -2000.054824 +0.000000 w= 1.88981 dN/dS (w) for site classes (K=11) p: 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.08895 0.11047w: 0.03624 0.04694 0.05420 0.06050 0.06653 0.07272 0.07947 0.08741 0.09800 0.11736 1.88981
2121
CODEML results contd…
Significance of results
Hypothesis Testing
●LRT = 2● Chi – square (
2222
Posterior probabilities of
● NEB
● BEB
2323
Local optima and the global optimum
Result
MEC – Mechanistic Empirical Combination Model
Assimilates empirical amino acid substitution probabilities
Selecton server at http://selecton.tau.ac.il/
2424
Commercial potential of RNAi
2525
Global market estimates for RNAi;
Year 2010: $ 3.5 billion
Year 2015: $ 10.5 billion• Major areas of RNAi applications in the expected
market;
• Drug discovery and research• Potential therapeutics• miRNA mediated diagnostics
Impact of molecular evolutionary analysis on advancement of RNAi
2626http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v6/n6/images/nrn1688-i1.gif 20.06.2009http://img.medscape.com/fullsize/migrated/548/891/ncpn548891.fig2.jpg 20.06.2009http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3210/images/02-cure-hepatitis.jpg 20.06.2009
Clues for universal therapeutics and diagnostics
Assurance of efficacious activity
Accelerate extensive researches on RNAi
Saves time, resources, labor and money in designing siRNAs & identifying potent miRNAs
2727
development of blue rosesSuccess: observed…
First brain stem cell therapySUCCESS: PENDING…???
http://www.stem-cells-news.com/1/2009/05/first-stem-cell-brain-surgery/ 20.06.2009http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Ha_cQO3YwFc/R6kGRjT5LiI/AAAAAAAADoQ/oi80O5KGIy4/s400/blueroses.jpg 20.06.2009
References1. Anisimova A, Yang Z. (2007). Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive
selection that affects only a few sites. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1219–1228.
2. Anisimova M, Bielawski JP, Yang Z. (2001). The accuracy and power of likelihood ratio tests to detect positive selection at amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1585–1592.
3. Anisimova M, Nielsen R, Yang Z. (2003). Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites. Genetics. 164:1229–1236.
4. Bahadori M. (2008). New Advances in RNAs. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 11 (4), 435-43.
5. Bumcrot D, Manoharan M, Koteliansky V, & Sah DW. (2006). RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs. Nature Chemical Biology.2 (12), 711-9.
6. Campbell TN, & Choy FY. (2005). RNA interference: past, present and future. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 7 (1), 1-6.
7. Ding, S. W. (2005). RNAi: Mechanisms, biology and applications. FEBS LETTERS. 579 (26), 5821.
8. Doron-Faigenboim, A., & Pupko, T. (2007). A Combined Empirical and Mechanistic Codon Model. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION. 24 (2), 388-397.
9. Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.
10. Grimm D, & Kay MA. (2007). Therapeutic application of RNAi: is mRNA targeting finally ready for prime time? The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 117 (12), 3633-41.
11. Jain KK. (2006). Commercial potential of RNAi. Molecular BioSystems. 2 (11), 523-6.
2828
12. Jin, G., Nakhleh,L., Snir, S., Tuller,T. (2006).Maximum likelihood of phylogenetic networks. 22 ,21,2604–2611.
13. Kim D, & Rossi J. (2008). RNAi mechanisms and applications. BioTechniques. 44 (5), 613-6.
14. Press release by the Nobel Assembly on the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello for their discovery of RNAi: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2006/press.html
15. Rayburn ER, & Zhang R. (2008). Antisense, RNAi, and gene silencing strategies for therapy: mission possible or impossible? Drug Discovery Today. 13 (11-12), 11-12.
16. Shabalina, S. A., & Koonin, E. V. (2008). Origins and evolution of eukaryotic RNA interference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 23 (10), 578-587.
17. Shrivastava N, & Srivastava A. (2008). RNA interference: an emerging generation of biologicals. Biotechnology Journal. 3 (3), 339-53.
18. Sledz CA, & Williams BR. (2005). RNA interference in biology and disease. Blood. 106 (3), 787-94.
19. Tan YL, & Yin JQ. (2005). [Application of RNAi to cancer therapy]. Yao Xue Xue Bao = Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 40 (3), 193-8.
20. Wong WS, Yang Z, Goldman N, & Nielsen R. (2004). Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites. Genetics. 168 (2), 1041-51.
21. Yang, Z. (2007). PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood .Mol. Biol. Evol. 24(8):1586–1591.
2929
THANK YOU
3030