rail yard case study: aging subsurface infrastructure and environmental...

21
HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart Boykin, CSX Transportation Mike Feamster, Ramboll Environ Tobias Parker, Ramboll Environ Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issues 2015 Railroad Environmental Conference October 27 & 28, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 26-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

HOW TOMORROW MOVES

Stuart Boykin, CSX TransportationMike Feamster, Ramboll EnvironTobias Parker, Ramboll Environ

Rail Yard Case Study:Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issues

2015 Railroad Environmental ConferenceOctober 27 & 28, 2015

Page 2: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Aging Rail Yard Infrastructure Across the US

• Many rail yards over 100 years old• Non-standardized documentation• Disjointed growth and connectivity of infrastructure• Limited access to aged underground infrastructure

2

Page 3: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Case Study: A Tale of Two Outfalls

NPDES OUTFALL

CSXT Boundary

Late February 2014, a sheen was identified at NPDES Outfall, not at

SW plant

3

Page 4: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Case Study: A Tale of Two Outfalls

• There was no visible source of sheen from stormwatersystem

• Investigate outside CSXT property• Reduced known flow to stormwater outfall• Inaccurate/incomplete documentation led to involved

investigation

Identified compromised sanitary sewer pipe 50 feet below ground

4

Page 5: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Case Study: A Tale of Two Outfalls

5

Page 6: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Case Study: A Tale of Two Outfalls

The only pipe to city sewer was inoperable

• Divert flow away from collapsed pipe– Sanitary wastewater- collected in frac

tanks; discharge to city– WWTF effluent-diverted to

stormwater treatment plant; discharge to NPDES outfall

• Installed tertiary treatment at WWTF

• Flushed stormwater treatment plant upstream piping

6

Page 7: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Investigation and Risk Management

7

Page 8: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Investigation and Risk Management: Challenges

• Large drainage area covering non-CSXT properties– Hundreds of acres– Numerous adjacent Industrial

property owners• Inaccurate/incomplete

documentation and maps• Confined space• Active rail lines• Infrastructure limitations• Significant depths

– Limited to no accessibility

8

Page 9: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Investigation and Risk Management: Tools

• Investigated stormwater and sanitary manholes– Smoke testing– Dye testing– Camera investigation

• Locator head attached to camera

9

Page 10: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Investigation and Risk Management: Findings

• Located previously unidentified influent and effluent piping

• Identified unique connections• Identified properly labelled

manholes• Identified compromised

pipe

10

Page 11: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution

11

Page 12: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution: Implementation

Installed triplex pump station:• Compromised pipe 50-ft deep under

active tracks• Pump station location

• Near compromised pipe• Remote from WWTF• Accessible for construction and

maintenance• Remote location challenges:

• Independent power and controls• Telemetry for remote monitoring

and controls• Redundant (Fail Safe) pump,

power and controls

12

Page 13: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution: Remote Location

13

Page 14: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution: Construction Challenges

• Underground challenges: boulders, piping, cables, signal lines

• Active Rail Yard; (~50 feet between track and access road)

• Significant Depth (>40 feet)

14

Page 15: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution: Construction Challenges

• Personnel Safety• Caged access• Fall protection

• Non-Traditional Installation

15

Page 16: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Long Term Solution: Operational Challenges

• Fully automated PLC with alarms• Fail safes

• Triplex pump station (installed backup pump)

• Emergency generator• Primary radar level control with

backup float switches• PLC fails then backup float switches

• Communications• Cellular telemetry for remote access

• Accessibility• Active Rail Yard; (~50 feet between track and

access road)16

Page 17: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Lessons Learned

17

Page 18: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Lessons Learned to Apply Across Industry

• Almost all rail yards across the industry have aged infrastructure, including buried piping

• Update Pipe Maps– Confirm pipe is coming from and going to properly

designated locations– Correct any concerns or improper cross connections

• Consider future maintenance as part of current design• Project Implementation

– Construction challenges– Operational challenges

18

Page 20: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

Questions?

20

Page 21: Rail Yard Case Study: Aging Subsurface Infrastructure and Environmental Issuesrailtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/pdf-archive/... · 2018. 2. 27. · HOW TOMORROW MOVES Stuart

H O W T O M O R R O W M O V E S