radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries
DESCRIPTION
Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries. hot. Robert S Schwartz MD Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN. Figure 1. Stimulation of neointima within an irradiated artery. Figure 2. Minimal neointimal neoplasia post stent placement. External beam radiation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Radiation for restenosis:the dark side of arteries
Robert S Schwartz MDProfessor of MedicineMayo ClinicRochester, MN
![Page 2: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Stimulation of neointima within an irradiated artery
Figure 1
![Page 3: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Minimal neointimal neoplasia post stent placement
Figure 2
![Page 4: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
External beam radiation
• major US center• 11 patient pilot study• 8 Gy external beam radiation• 11/11 restenosis
the restenosis rate was 100%
![Page 5: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Radiation injury to blood vessels
• capillary injury is greatest• obliteration of capillaries
one mechanism of anti-tumor action• thrombosis, rupture, fibrosis• occasionally lymphocytic vasculitis• venous lesions are uncommon
![Page 6: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Induction of neointima post external beam radiation
Figure 3
![Page 7: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Venezuelan study
the late loss is too high
Figure 4: late loss (millimeters)
0.44 0.400.33 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25
Condado LRT MARCATOR BENESTENT HELVETICA CARPORT MERCATOR PARK
Condado J, Circulation 1997;96:727
![Page 8: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3 questions on radiation
• Q: Is arterial radiation feasible?A: “Yes”
• Q: Is it safe?A: “We doubt it”
• Q: Is it efficacious?A:”We don’t think so”
Serruys et al, Circulation 1997;96:709-712
![Page 9: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Neointimal hyperplasia at former sites of radiation
Figure 5
![Page 10: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PREVENT trial
Figure 6Restenosis in the treated segment
Raizner et al, PREVENT trial 1998
9.1%
22.2%
0.0%
25.0%
P 32 Control
![Page 11: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PREVENT trial
Figure 7Restenosis in the adjacent segment
Raizner et al, PREVENT trial 1998
22.7%
11.1%
0.0%
25.0%
P 32 Control
![Page 12: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PREVENT trial
Figure 8Restenosis in the treated and adjacent segments
Raizner et al, PREVENT trial 1998
22.7% 22.2%
0.0%
25.0%
P 32 Control
![Page 13: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
BERT trial
• restenosis rate of 17%• 6 patients with an “edge problem”
• overall restenosis rate of 25%
![Page 14: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Beta emitting stents and restenosis
Figure 9Restenosis in the treated and adjacent segments
56.0%(10/18)
39.0%(11/28)
45.0%(5/11)
50.0%(1/2)
0.75-3 uCi 3-6 uCi 6-12 uCi 12-20 uCi
![Page 15: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cellular neointimal hyperplasia of in-stent restenosis
Figure 10
![Page 16: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Neointimal hyperplasia at former sites of radiation
Figure 11
![Page 17: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• European registry, 150 patients• PTCA up to 2 vessels• Beta-Cath system, 90-Sr/Y• 12,14,16 Gy to 2 mm from source• target vessel restenosis 30%• late loss index 13%
Serruys, 1999
The BRIE trial
![Page 18: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Human coronary artery thrombus in situ
Figure 12
![Page 19: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Multi-layered thrombus in a pig coronary artery
Figure 13
Old thrombus
New thrombus
Absence of neointima
![Page 20: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Intracoronary beta radiation
Figure 14Effects of intracoronary beta-radiation after 6 months in stented vessels
2.843.16
0
1
2
3
4
control treated
Neoin
tim
al
are
a (
mm
2)
P=NS
![Page 21: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Figure 15Angiographic restenosis rate
54%
17%
control radiated
SCRIPPS trial
![Page 22: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Figure 16The SCRIPPS radiated group, a long term analysis
0
1
2
3
post 6 months 3 years
Min
imu
m l
um
inal
dia
mete
r (m
m)
ControlRadiated
SCRIPPS trial
P=NS
![Page 23: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Figure 17GAMMA-I 6 month follow-up
0
1
2
3
before pre post f/u
Min
imu
m l
um
inal
dia
mete
r (m
m)
ControlRadiated
GAMMA-I in-stent measures
![Page 24: Radiation for restenosis: the dark side of arteries](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56813615550346895d9d8c22/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EVG Actin
Heat injury
Figure 18