radar stage sensors and other instrumentation issues from the icom (instrumentation committee)...
TRANSCRIPT
Radar stage sensors and other instrumentation issues
from the ICOM (Instrumentation Committee)
November 14, 2006
James Fallon
Annual COE-NWS-USGS Mississippi Valley meeting
Memphis, Tennessee
13-04-2006
Radar stage sensor information Radar stage sensor information adapted* from: adapted* from:
USGS Hydrologic Instrumentation USGS Hydrologic Instrumentation FacilityFacility
Testing Section Project UpdatesTesting Section Project Updates
ICOM meetingICOM meetingJuly 11, 2006July 11, 2006
*(Brand) names have been changed to protect against endorsements
• Instrumentation Development
• Commerically Available Instrumenation (ICOM)
• Radar Stage Measurement (ICOM)
HIF Testing ProjectsHIF Testing Projects
Timeline of radar stage sensors• 1999: Radar stage sensors tested at
the HIF, tracked by ICOM. Issues:– Accuracy, range, FCC licensing,
temperature effects, communication, power conversion, wave and rain interference
• 2002: Most technical issues seemed OK, HIF stocks unit, ICOM ends project, asks for more field, product testing
• 2003: New issues emerge:– Reports indicate accuracy of instrument
dependent upon water conditions (roughness, wave height and frequency).
– New generation of products need testing.
– Does current definition of stage accuracy apply to new method?
– What are installation requirements?Apollo rocket inspection building near the HIFused for static tests of radars in early testing
USGS stage-accuracy requirements for discharge computation:
• The combined accuracy of the total assemblage of instruments, equipment, and procedures…
• Are to be capable of sensing and recording stage with an uncertainly of no more than 0.01 ft or 0.20 percent of indicated reading
• The accuracy requirement for any single component generally will be more stringent than the requirement for the system as a whole.
• …Assessment of error magnitudes and of achievable accuracies of the various system components led to … the larger of 0.01 ft or 0.10 percent of reading as the accuracy standard for the procurement of … pressure-sensor instruments.
Radar measures stage as footprint of a variable area, dependent upon height of radar above water
Previous systems measure stage of a column of water above a point
Are measurements equivalent?
Timeline of radar stage sensors• 2004: ICOM
reorganized (elevator music here)
• 2005: Headquarters issues interim guidance requesting that field:– Does not purchase
instruments for widespread use
– Works with HIF for quality assurance testing of sensors that are purchased for unique situations
• 2005: HIF reports:Saturn rocket engine testing pad used for radar tests over water in early testing
Radars still purchased—Wouldn’t you if you had this gage?
Trace a ‘best guess’ of gage heights. In some cases the ‘peaks’ or ‘bottoms’ of the painting would be preferred. In painting like this, a trace at about mid-point is used.
• Brand X, model 1
• Brand Y (2 models)
• Brand Z, model 1
• Brand W (not shown)
Non Contact StageNon Contact Stage
4 Models Available4 Models Available
Stage Radars - 2005Stage Radars - 2005
Is Radar Good Enough (2005)?
• Brand X, model 1, problems with accuracy & FCC licensing
• Brand Y (USA), problems with accuracy• Brand Y (EU), problems with FCC licensing• Brand Z, Model 1, no SDI-12, accuracy is
promising
NO!NO!
• TWO commercially available models w/ 12 vdc & SDI-12
• Brand Z, Model 1
• Brand X, Model 1
• Both are pulse radars (FCC approved)
• Temperature tested
• Lab range tests underway
Radar Stage – New Models!Radar Stage – New Models!
• Vendor consulted with HIF on new unit development
• Pulse radar, low power
• Battery power (12vdc) & SDI-12
• Spec accuracy +/-0.01 ft <66 ft
• Units arrived early 2006
Radar Stage – Brand Z, Model 1Radar Stage – Brand Z, Model 1
New
Old
• Vendor has discontinued old model
• Demonstration sites at USGS Water Science Center stations
• Battery power (12vdc) & SDI-12
• Spec. accuracy of +/- 0.01 ft <32 ft.
Stage Radar – Brand X, model 1Stage Radar – Brand X, model 1
Walk-in ChamberWalk-in Chamber
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Ellapsed time in Hours
Dev
iati
on
in
fee
t fr
om
10
feet
of
stag
e
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Tem
per
atu
re i
n º
C
SN 12643992 SN 12639922 (proto) Temperature
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 125.00 150.00 175.00 200.00 225.00
ELAPSED TIME IN HOURS
DIF
FE
RE
NC
E W
ITH
RE
FE
RE
NC
E
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
TE
MP
ER
AT
UR
E IN
DE
GR
EE
S C
SN 1023 SN 1022 Temp
Temperature Temperature TestingTesting
Brand Z
Brand X, model 1
Is Radar Good Enough (2006)?
• Brand X, Model 1 accurate over temperature range.
• Brand Z, Model 1 working to improve units.
• Waves and sampling rates may affect accuracy.
• Air gap testing over larger ranges needed.
MAYBE!MAYBE!
Radar Measurement Questions
Do waves bias measurements low?
How does measurement timing & sample length affect accuracy?
Radar – Wave Effects
• Investigate effects of waves on sampling rate & accuracy
• Construction of wave generator
• Modification of existing test stand
• Horse Mesa Dam Reservoir drawdown fall 2006
• Brand X, Model 1.
• Brand Z, Model 1.
• Brand W
• Remote camera & weather instrumentation
• Instruments sent to AZ
• SRP making mounts
PlansPlans
Field Testing Partnership with SRPField Testing Partnership with SRP
•Accuracy check over large air gaps.
•Can Tow Cart be used?
Radar – Air Gap
Preliminary Air Gap Results
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.081
3-M
ay-
06
18
-Ma
y-0
6
23
-Ma
y-0
6
28
-Ma
y-0
6
2-J
un
-06
7-J
un
-06
12
-Ju
n-0
6
17
-Ju
n-0
6
22
-Ju
n-0
6
27
-Ju
n-0
6
DIF
FE
RE
NC
E w
ith
RE
FE
RE
NC
E i
n F
EE
T
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
HE
IGH
T A
BO
VE
in
FE
ET
H3611
Puls 62
Arm Height
Brand XBrand Z S
hould
be S
TA
GE?
Pearl River PierPearl River Pier
Radar Stage Measurement
Horn antenna
• Temperature may affect radar measurements.
• Sampling period affects measurement uncertainty.
• Radar possibly biased “low” for wavy conditions.
• Radar is less accurate when air gap increases.
• Site licenses can be needed for some radars
Findings So FarFindings So Far
Discussion