r · 2013. 11. 6. · r ,., ,. department of energy washington, dc 20585 october 23, 1998 the...
TRANSCRIPT
r ,., ,.
Department of EnergyWashington, DC 20585
October 23, 1998
The Honorable John T. Conway
ChairmanDefense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board625 Indiana Avenue N. W.Suite 700Washington, D.C. 20004
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Enclosed is the quarterly progress report on implementation of Defense NuclearFacilities Safety Board Recommendation 94-2 for the period from July 1, 1998, toSeptember 30, 1998. The report addresses the Recommendation 94-2 taskinitiatives which have not yet been completed, as well as Departmental activitiesclosely related to the task initiatives committed to in response to DNFSBRecommendation 94-2.
The report shows that the Department made good progress on major activitiesduring this reporting period. The progress includes: issuance of the disposalauthorization statement for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Low-LevelWaste Disposal Area G, issuance of the Low-Level Waste Disposal CapacityReport, Revision 1, completion of the Complex-Wide Strate~,fbr Maintenance ofDepartment of Energy Low-Level Waste Disposal Facili@ Pe~formanceAssessments and Composite Analyses and completion of the Low-Level Waste
Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group: Interim Performance Assessment andComposite Analysis Review Guidance Manual. A status table in the reportprovides the status of all of the Recommendation 94-2 task initiatives.
If you have any questions concerning this information, please contact me at(202) 586-7710 or Mark Frei at (202) 586-0370.
Sincerely,
~_. t!!M’”1. O.--.-L= ‘<I
James M. OwendoffActing Assistant Secretary
for Environmental Management
Enclosure
cc:Mark B. Whitaker, Jr.. S-3.1Carol Peabody, EM-4
Defense
Quarterly Report
for
Implementation Plan
Nuclear Facilities
Recommendation
Safety Board
94-2
Conformance with Safety Standards atDepartment of Energy
Low-Level Nuclear Waste and Disposal Sites
July 1 through September 30, 1998
Quarterly Report forImplementation Plan
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety BoardRecommendation 94-2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Department of Energy (DOE) issued the “Implementation Plan, Defense NuclearFacilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 94-2” in March 1995. In May 1996DOE issued a revision to the Implementation Plan that reflected enhancements to DOE’sapproaches to systems engineering and the radiological assessments, and betterintegration and coordination of both the task initiatives and the involved organizations.In August 1996, the Department received a letter from the DNFSB accepting the revisedImplementation Plan, with conditions. In a July 9, 1998 letter to the Board. the Secretaryof Energy proposed revised dates for the DNFSB 94-2 commitments that had not beencompleted. In addition, the Department committed to reporting on a number of otheractivities closely related to the DNFSB 94-2 implementation tasks.
This quarterly report focuses on progress made towards completing the tasks outlined inthe Secretary’s July 9, 1998 letter. The attachment provided with this report provides afull report on the status of all of the DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 task initiatives.
2.0 OVERVIEW
2.1 General Progress
During this reporting period the Department completed a number of commitments in theImplementation Plan and completed a significant number of interim activities in supportof the commitments. The Department issued the disposal authorization statement for theLos Alamos National Laboratory Low-Level Waste Disposal Area G authorizing thecontinued operations of the facility subject to the conditions in the disposal authorizationstatement. The Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group and thesubordinate review teams continued their review activities of the other disposal facilities.The review teams for radiological assessments at the Oak Ridge Reservation and theSavannah River Site completed their reports. The Low-Level Waste Disposal FacilitiesFederal Review Group met to consider the reports and the related performanceassessments/composite analyses, and make recommendations to the Department’s seniormanagement on the course of action to be taken for each disposal facility. In addition. theNevada Test Site Area 3 review team completed the bulk of its review and is in theprocess of preparing its report.
lofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
The draft DOE Order, Radioactive Waste Management, and the associated manual weremade available for public review through a notice in the Federal Register. The commentperiod has closed and staff are in the process of evaluating comments and determining
resolutions. The commitment to develop a guidance document for the review ofperformance assessments and composite analyses was completed with the preparation ofthe Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group Manual. TheDepartment also completed the last commitment in the Low-Level Waste Projections taskarea with the issuance of the Current and Planned Low-Level Waste Disposal CapacityReport, Revision 1. And lastly, a strategy for using the maintenance of low-level wastedisposal facility performance assessments and composite analyses as a driving force foraddressing research and development in support of low-level waste management wasprepared.
2.2 Meetings with the DNFSB and Staff
2.2.1 Meetings During this Reporting Period
During the current reporting period, the following meetings were held:
9 DOE and DNFSB staff met on July 8, 1998 to present the current status of theRecommendation 94-2 tasks and the revisions of the DOE Order on RadioactiveWaste Management.
● DOE and DNFSB staff met in September 1998 to discuss the review of the DOEOrder on Radioactive Waste Management.
2.2.2 Meetings in Future Reporting Periods
The following meetings between the Department and the DNFSB/staff are proposed forthe next reporting period:
● DOE and DNFSB staff will meet to discuss resolution of comments andfinalization of the draft Radioactive Waste Management Order revision.
● DOE will brief the DNFSB on the final revision of the Radioactive WasteManagement Order.
3.0 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS DUE
The following tables summarize the status of the remaining DNFSB Recommendation94-2 commitments and the additional low-level waste-related task initiatives on which theDepartment is reporting.
/
For those commitments that were included in the Implementation Plan. there are at leasttwo indicators provided in the first column. Those listed in the format “’VIII.B. 1.b.2° are
2ofll94-2 Qtrlv
September 30.1998
task numbers as listed in the Implementation Plan. Those in the format “R94-02 033” areidentification numbers as reported in the Department’s Safety Issues Management System
(SIMS). A full copy of the SIMS report is included as an appendix to this report. TheStatus column provides a brief description of the status of the task initiative. Substantivechanges in status since the previous report are presented in bold.
Status of Remaining DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 Task Initiatives
1P Task # Title or Description Due StatusSIMS ID # Date
.FISC’AL YEAR 1998
v
VII. B.5.b.2 Submit Hanford Site composite 06/30/98 Completed. The compositeR94-02 030-009 analysis to Headquarters for analysis was submitted to
review. Headquarters in March 1998. Aletter notifiing the DNFSB ofcompletion was transmitted on7/1 0/98. Team Leader selected.Review is being scheduled basedon team member availability.
VII. B.5.b.2 Submit Idaho Radioactive 06/30/98 Completed. The compositeWaste Management Complex analysis was submitted to
R94-02 030-003 composite analysis to Headquarters in May 1998. AHeadquarters for review. letter noti@ing the DNFSB of
completion was transmitted on7/1 0/98. Team Leader is beingselected.
VII. B.5.b.l/2/3 Complete Headquarters’ review 08/3 1/98 Completed. HeadquartersR94-02 029-002 of LANL performance completed its review and
assessment. issued a disposal authorizationstatement with conditions to
R94-02 030-002 Complete Headquarters’ review 08/31/98 the site. A copy of the disposalof LANL composite analysis. authorization statement was
R94-0203 1-001 transmitted to the Board onIssue disposal authorization 09/30/98 10/2/98.statement.
3ofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
Status of Remaining DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 Task Initiatives
1P Task # Title or Description Due StatusSIMS ID # Date
VIII.B.l.b.2 Issue Low-Level Waste 08/31/98 Completed. The report wasR94-02 033 Disposal Capacity Report, transmitted to the Board on
Revision 1. 9/17/98.
IX.B.3 Determine Outstanding LLW 08/31/98 Completed IX.B.3. The reportR94-02 038 R&D Needs. was transmitted to the Board
on 10/1/98.
IX.B.4 Prepare Strategy to Address 08/31/98 Partially completed IX.B.4. AR94-02 039 LLW R&D Needs. strategy for addressing R&D
needs through the maintenanceof radiological assessments wastransmitted to the Board on10/1/98. A process forimplementing the strategy willbe shared with Board staff bythe end of the calendar year1998.
VII.B.5.b.2/3 Complete Headquarters’ review 09/30/98 In progress. In June 1998, theR94-02 030-012 of Savannah River Site review team submitted its
composite analysis. report to the LLW DisposalFacilities Federal Review
R94-02 031-009 Issue Saltstone disposal 09/30/98 Group. The Group is in theauthorization statement. process of evaluating the
report and composite analysis.
VII.B.5.b.2/3 Issue E-Area Vaults disposal 09/30/98 In progress. In June 1998, theR94-02 031-008 authorization statement. review team submitted its
report to the LLW DisposalFacilities Federal ReviewGroup. The Group is in theprocess of evaluating thereport and composite analysis.
4ofll94-2 Qtrl y
September 30, 1998
Status of Remaining DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 Task Initiatives
1P Task # Title or Description Due StatusSIMS ID # Date
FISCAL YEAR 1999
VII. B.5.b.l/2/3R94-02 029-008
R94-02 030-008
R94-0203 1-005
VII. B.5.b.l/2/3R94-02 029-006
R94-02 031-004
VII. B.5.b.2R94-02 030-010
VII. B.5.b.2/3R94-02031-O06
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof Oak Ridge Solid WasteStorage Area 6 performanceassessment.
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof SWSA-6 composite analysis.
Issue disposal authorizationstatement.
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof the Nevada Test Site Area 3performance assessment/composite analysis.
Issue disposal authorizationstatement.
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof Hanford composite analysis;document conclusion relative toEnvironmental RestorationDisposal Facility.
Issue 200 West Area burialgrounds disposal authorizationstatement.
10/15/98
10/
10/
5/98
5/98
10/31/98
10/3 1/98
03/31/99
03/31/99
In progress. Review team hassubmitted its report to theLLW Disposal FacilitiesFederal Review Group. TheGroup reviewed the report, theperformance assessment, andthe composite analysis, and onAugust 19, 1998 sent a letter tothe site requiring a plan toaddress issues. Helddiscussions with the siteconcerning the issues andclosure. The site is developinga response to the issues.
In progress. Review team hascompleted its review anddeveloped a report. A draft ofthe report is under review bythe review team.
Pending. Review team leaderhas been selected; review willcommence in the first quarterof FY 1999.
=1of Hanford composite analysis.
5ofll94-2 Qtrl y
Scp[ember 30.1998
Status of Remaining DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 Task Initiatives
1P Task #SIMS ID #
VII. B.5.b.2/3R94-0203 1-007
VII. B.5.b.2/3R94-02 030-004
R94-0203 1-002
VII. B.5.b.2R94-02 030-005
~
Issue 200 East Area burial 03/31/99grounds disposal authorizationstatement.
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof Idaho composite analysis.
Issue disposal authorizationstatement.
05/15/99
05/15/99
Submit Nevada Test Site Area 5composite analysis toHeadquarters for review.
09/30/99
Status
Pending. Dependent on reviewof Hanford composite analysis.
FISCAL YEAR 2000
VII. B.5.b.2/3R94-02 030-006
R94-02 031-003
Pending. Review team leaderhas been selected; review willcommence in the secondquarter of FY 1999.
In progress. Work is underwayto complete the compositeanalysis before the end of thefiscal year.
Complete Headquarters’ reviewof Nevada Test Site Area 5composite analysis.
Issue disposal authorizationstatement.
06/30/00
06/30/00
Pending. Task will start uponreceipt of the composite analysis.
6ofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
Status of Related Low-Level Waste Management Initiatives Not Included inImplementation Plan
Title or Description Proposed StatusDue Date
, I
FISCAL YEAR 1998
I IComplete guidance manual forthe Low-Level Waste DisposalFacilities Federal Review Group
Complete revision ofRadioactive Waste ManagementOrder, Manual, and guidance.
08/31/98 Completed. A guidance manual for the reviewof performance assessments and compositeanalyses has been prepared. The manual wastransmitted to the Board on 9/17/98.
09/30/98 In progress. Draft Order, Manual, andContractor Requirements Document, were madeavailable for public review on 7/31/98. Revisionsbased on consideration of the comments are inpreparation.
1 I
, FISCAL YEAR 1999
I iComplete Headquarters’ reviewof the Hanford LLW GlassDisposal Facility performance
assessment and issue disposalauthorization statement.
03/31/99 Pending. Richland Operations Office submitted theperformance assessment to Headquarters for reviewin March 1998. Review team leader is beingselected; performance assessment review willcommence in the first quarter of FY 1999.
4.0 TASK AREA STATUS
4.1 Regulatory Structure and Process
The draft order, DOE O 435.1. Radioactive Waste Management, the accompanyingmanual, DOE M 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management klanual, guidance, and technicalbasis documentation were issued for DOE and DNFSB review on February 28, 1997.Issuance of the draft documents completed the DNFSB Recommendation 94-2commitments in this task area. For purposes of continuity, finalization of the RadioactiveWaste Management directives, which address high-level and transuranic waste as well aslow-level waste, is being tracked under this task area.
7ofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
During this reporting period, the Order, Manual, and related Contractors RequirementsDocuments, were prepared in draft and made available for a 30-day public review periodthrough a notice in the Federal Register. During the review period, work continued onthe guidance document which is to accompany the Order and Manual. Over a dozenindividuals or organizations submitted comments on the Order and Manual. At the end of
the reporting period, the comments were being reviewed to determine which would causea change to the Order and Manual.
During the next reporting period, the DOE will revise all of the documents based oncomments received from the public, DNFSB staff, DOE organizations, DOE contractors,and the panel of experts assembled to provide an independent review of the order revisionproducts. Following resolution of the comments, the Order and related documents willbe coordinated throughout DOE to obtain the concurrences necessary for issuance asDOE directives.
The Department has also committed to the preparation of a guidance manual for the DOEreview of performance assessments and composite analyses. The Department establisheda Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group and charged it withreviewing low-level waste disposal facility performance assessments and compositeanalyses for technical adequacy and projections of compliance, and recommending action
(approval, approval with conditions, disapproval) to the Environmental ManagementDeputy Assistant Secretaries. During this reporting period. the Group reviewed anotherdraft of the manual and provided final comments. The comments were resolved and theLow-Level Waste Disposal Facili@ Federal Review Group Manual was issued for use. Acopy of the manual was transmitted to the DNFSB on September 17, 1998. The currentversion of the manual provides guidance for review of performance assessments preparedin accordance with DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management. and compositeanalyses prepared in accordance with the DNFSB Recommendation 94-2 ImplementationPlan. The plan is to revise the manual after DOE O 435.1 is issued to reflect anyrevisions and also to incorporate feedback from previously conducted reviews.
4.2 Radiological Assessments
During the current reporting period, the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities FederalReview Group and its review teams made significant progress on reviewing radiologicalassessments and recommending action on disposal authorization statements at four of thesix DOE sites with low-level waste disposal facilities.
8ofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
During the previous reporting period, the review team submitted its report on the
performance assessment and composite analysis for the Los Alamos National LaboratoryArea G disposal facility. Following its analysis of the review report and the radiologicalassessment, the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group developed acompliance evaluation, drafted a disposal authorization statement, and recommended
issuance of the disposal authorization statement with conditions. On October 2, 1998, theDeputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management and the Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Environmental Restoration issued the disposal authorization statement which includedconditions for Los Alamos National Laboratory to perform additional studies to addressuncertainties in data and parameters used in the radiological assessment.
On July21 and 22, 1998, the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Groupmet at the Oak Ridge Reservation to complete its review of the Solid Waste Storage Area6 performance assessment and composite analysis. The review team had previouslyprovided a copy of its report to the Group. After discussion with the review team leaderand among the Group members, it was decided that the performance assessment andcomposite analysis were incomplete and the review could not be completed. On August19, 1998, a memorandum was sent to the Oak Ridge Operations Office conveying thedecision of the Group and asking for a response within 30 days. The memorandum alsogave Oak Ridge Operations Office interim authorization to operate during the 30 day timeframe. There have been discussions with Oak Ridge Operations Office concerningcompliance issues and closure, and the site is in the process of developing a responseconcerning the compliance issues and closure.
The Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Federal Review Group met on July 23 and 24,1998 at the Savannah River Site to complete its review of the site’s composite analysisand determine a course of action with respect to the E-Area Vaults and Saltstone disposalauthorization statements. The Group determined that a schedule for a maintenance planwould be requested of the site. The schedule for a maintenance plan would indicate howthe performance assessmenticomposite analysis’ technical inadequacies would beaddressed by the site. Based on development of an acceptable schedule for a performanceassessment/composite analysis maintenance plan, the Group would develop disposalauthorization statements basis for the two disposal facilities.
The Nevada Test Site Area 3 review team continues to work on its review of theperformance assessment and composite analysis. The review team members haveprovided input to the team leader who has compiled a draft review team report. Thereport is currently being reviewed by the team members.
9ofll94-2 Qtrly
Scp[ember 30, 1998
During this reporting period, the Department notified the DNFSB of the receipt of theComposite Analysis, for Low-Level Waste Disposal in the 200 Area Plateau of the
Hanford Site and the Low-Level Waste Radioactive Waste Management ComplexComposite Analysis. Team leaders have been selected for the review of each of thesedocuments.
During the next reporting period, the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities FederalReview Group will continue to work towards making recommendations on theoutstanding radiological assessments. There will be discussions with the Savannah Riverand Oak Ridge Operations Offices regarding the actions and commitments they need tomake in response to the Department’s memoranda regarding their respective radiologicalassessments. The Nevada Test Site Area 3 review team wi 11submit its report to the
Group which is planning to meet during the next reporting period to complete its reviewof the Nevada Test Site Area 3 performance assessment and composite analysis. TheGroup is expected to make a recommendation to the Deputy Assistant Secretary forWaste Management and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Restorationregarding acceptance of the radiological assessment and issuance of a disposalauthorization statement following the meeting.
4.3 Low-Level Waste Projections
The Department completed the final commitment in the Low-Level Waste Projectionstask area during this reporting period with the July 17, 1998 transmittal of the Currentand Planned Lo~~-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report, Revision 1. This reportupdates a report prepared two years ago. The current revision projects that theDepartment has adequate volumetric disposal capacity except for onsite disposal at theLos Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos is preparing an environmental impactstatement that addresses increasing the disposal capacity at the site and has sufficientcapacity for the near term. With the exception of the Savannah River Site IntermediateLevel Vaults, the report projects adequate radiological capacity for the waste projected tobe disposed at DOE disposal facilities. Although the report indicates a potential problemwith radiological capacity for the Intermediate Level Vaults, there are mitigatingconditions. First. the conservatism of the analysis and uncertainties associated with theextrapolation of radiological data likely overestimate the dose impact. Inventory controls,design modifications. and waste form changes may be used to ensure that the vaults donot cause an unacceptable dose impact. In addition, the Department appears to haveexcess capacity at other sites.
loofll94-2 Qtrlv
September 30, 1998
4.4 Research and Development
During the current reporting period, the Department completed a document entitledComplex- Wide StrategY for Maintenance qf Department qf Energy Low-Level WasteDisposal Facility Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses. The document
describes a strategy for integrating the Headquarters and Field Office activities related toperformance assessment and composite analysis maintenance such that research anddevelopment needs for low-level waste disposal are addressed. The document lacks aspecific implementing process for the strategy which will be prepared before DOEproposes closure of the Research and Development task area.
Ilofll94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
Appendix
Safety Issues Management System
Report for Recommendation 94-2
July 1 to September 30, 1998
94-2 Qtrly
September 30, 1998
(- Y’ ) Safety Issues Y ‘yugemetlt System ‘\
Rr-sp.org. EM
Rec H7w-tr2
194-D2
K9W2
Wwoz
R9T02
RWQ2
R94-M
R9WL
R94-W
Ww
-.
M #ml -
Oul
-uB—
.&_
.Mz-.
~oz..
tm-
.“D2..
002
-Mz_
) Summarv Recommendation Rem ev Commitment and Action Information)
Recoin mersdntion # R94-02 Conform m’scewitlt Safety Shrrdkrds at Low -Levei Nuclear Waste Disposul SkV
Resp, Mgr. MI Mariin lxtourncau DR Contmcf lvk. Michael Wortcy
—.Letu Commiimeu~Staiement
‘– The PmEecl7iMnagemcnIr’lati7pJ-r~ upfif~~fomarsBgcIhe &k initMivcs rmdcommltmerdsdescdbcdin ltsisImpkmenlation Plan
- The fNWLcvcl Wr@eMmm@menFllsk GFimp~. LWfWG)will eskddisha regularRpart forma~andprovidequarterlymporis!Ohe Boasdon progresson drcammibnents desarlredin Ibis ImplementadonPlan,
lol—
102—
)or-
~M-. .
,05 .-–
D06‘-
007 -
ml
Tiimsmm‘ Will establwh a regularreport!OSmdaMlprovide qumtertyrepmlsto the Boardon progresson rhewmmisrneutsdesmkt in SJrislmplemerrlstionPlan,
T’iEXL_Wi-iSh a rsgularrefk+t torrnatsrId
provide qrrrrrtsdyreports to the Baesd on progresson Usemmunilsnenlsrksesibedin thk hrrpte’mentatianPlan.
l?EL~- WIII cstrnbhslsnr-egsrlarrepot !arrnal andpro~idcquarterlyreportsto theBoardon progressonthesnmmitmentsdescribed in this ImpksnenlsrdonPlan.
-mmnvm-rcmincstabi-Isha regularreport Iommt and
providequnskrlyreportsto the thard on pmgrew OnthrsIcommitmentsdescribedIn [his ImpiementnlionPltm.
-rhiwFil-a-will-Gm13iYF@iiiTE@iCf armrsland
providequrutcrlyreports10the Boardon progresson the1conrmltrnentsstcwibed ;n t.hk fmplenserrtationPiam
I‘lTIcLLWMT[iwill NiiLitiIh a fii~ar nmoti”t7mial-iid ——.
pfovick quadcrlyreportsto @ E&d on”progressan Use I
cbmmihnen~ desdbcd in this Inspkmenla[ionPk.
The L1.Whfl G will &tablish-%ieguttilFportTomudinrl ‘–providequarlerly reportsto thetlomd rrnprogresson Ihccommilrrwnlsdescdbedin SW lmpicmcrrlallanPIM.
Tlz LLWMTG FI~”e3Ebl~r@ihs SCflO~~ijl~——
provide quarterlyreports to the Board on progresson [heeommilmcrrlsdescribedIn thisJmpkmcntdiornPlan,
.—
Deliverable —V dated Pmjccl M anageriiii —PLr (PjMP).
QuaIIcTy ProgR59IkjiiYrts.
Q~(A&ll-June i9%).
-Y prows J@rf(Jsdy--%ptemben1996).
Qimitimy Progress Report[Jrsnunry- hfareh 1997)
QuarterlyFmgressKeporr. (Apri[. June 1997)
Qiiiiac~iFstr2@a; ~- S@emtrer 1997)
QuirTyT@KFl@~- “-–@csobcr- Ekcember 1997)
IJumlerly rwgress Report(January- March 1996)
n[.c.l,pg. III-9
H’ tatc3W96,CmsnilmentltJ.C2, pg. [II-JO
WaiiEa 41Yr4CommkmentJiJ.C.2,pg. [iJ-10
~Sded 4/9b,GmnnsilmenlBJ.C2, pg. IiI-lo
1P dat d 4191J
Com;ilnrenl’III,C.2, pg. III-10
Wili@lmrComrnltmcntliI!c,2, pg. m-io
m datsd 4736,
lii.c.z pg. 1[1-10
WiEte~79&Commitmentnr,c.2, PB,m-Io
IP daE5rTT~ ‘-C4nemsihwrml111.C.2,pg. I!I-lo
Wdnl ed 41Yb,Commitment[I[C2, pg. nI-lo
contpk”~?‘“ -tXiii
6R71i!J96
“Gpcn—.—.
Complete
7LM996
Complete
Ii/ 1/1996
Complete
217ii997
Complem
V 1/1997
Umpl-
7f3i/1997
UomplEl~
11/2! /1997
COmpkxc
501/1998
Lomplcle
7191i998— —---
Board Contact Mr. Stew SbAres
D–~criptive ‘&tus”
kCep[ed tar elosliii -wayk dated 7i29t98.
—- _— —
@iiRiiy Kept tor period ot@il throughJune1996lellve~d 712W96.
ElTar tionway~k dated1/21/97.
ktYGwendaI1/c onway tf––nted572VW
—-.et:UwerrdaR7CEiM@tfakd 7M98. -
-——— .—.—-
———-——Due Date
Urw’wm-
—
Pwiadic -Qwrtcrl)’, 30daysallerthcend oferschcalendaryenrquarler,
-0773T7199?T-
lW3r71996--
–oi’mti97-
..wmiwT..
“-071m97-
V0i3Tl199-r-
-OTlMfJ99a—
T4730m9r
Resp.Org. EM
RL#-_.
R!WL?
Rw02-
ItwOz
IwmT
R9WZ
R94T12
lL9Tn2
R!WD2
;mt #mz–
002””
Tor
lltH-
710s—
QikK–
-Oti
oo8–
-009-..
o[o—
—
—
—
Sqluy Issues) 6 enwftt Sys teulSummam Recommendation Repo ev Commitment and Action Information
)Rwommendation # R94-Q2 Con formance with Safety Standrm3s nt Law -Levet”Nuclsmr Waste Disposnl Sites
Rc.vp.Mgr. Mr. Martin LeLoumcau DR Codxct Ml. Michael Wmtcy
——Commitment Stn~ment
fhe L13VMTGwT17XEtif =aR@kr8 report lwront%iii->mvidequartc:ly reports to the Boardan progress on hemmmitrmsts dtwibed in Ibis lmphwmtatlon I%rr.
t’ii-cT.L\mmvimtibmkmgmmmpDma[ andprovhtequsrscrly rtpart.r to the Board Dn projy.m an tho:ommltrnents describedin UrisImplemcnlatian Plan.
~i~p–iirneid Wiii complete anddocumenl a .f’@emsmgineeringevaluationto aommplishtie mi.99ianDftbC LLW
prqg-ank
llsc Dcpartmenl wIIIeornfnlermddaeumentLLW pmgrasnsystemrequimmen!sloelsrdinggoats and nssumptimm
‘fKk3~ihtnsent Ml analyze I he reqrrtremenss10 de[ersmnewhatfimetions(setivitles)arenecessary10nezmmplishdrerequirementsand identifyany additionalrequiremerntvandfimetiansneededto integraselhe program
A Slrrdy Wtll be permrmedto evaluateItsesatety merW enddemcrksof usingafsrivalelyopemtaJ thcitity away tlom ODEsitesfor theexclusivedispossdof IJOE LL\V.
l%i-pm-nt’Wil[ prepareand mamlaissa Z%agrarnManagemerrfplan.
AZiiiiijTex-wF3eeorrecthii’ietlon plan witl~~~:orrsxt Ihc vuIrserebilitic5 swmmanacrossthe complex.
SibS3@Z71TieocrERiTFae41—.
on planspreparedasaresultofltiFL%mplex-WideRevkw constitutethe hill-d she improvementselivilies.
I’Ii? As-ieiiment ‘iVorkmg LhaupmFiiiiii~EEEiZilTa——
develophe comp!ex-widereviewproce.vs,The AwessmenlWorking Group Identifiesandseleets the Working GroupA.sscssmcnt‘reamsm performewtssatirmsof the 38 facilities.
DeliverssbleC@rlerly ProgressKepoiT@@TT- June)998)
QiiiiiErT)”t%ogriiSW=JUly ~Sep[ember199E)
DOELL\V nvuragemenlsyslem
englncesimg evaluationrepoft,
LL\ Vprogramrequirementsdocument-
LL W syssemdescriptiondocurnenL
Pl[vstlzifion gwdelures.
m t’mgram ManagementMan.
httlal complex-wldcemrrechvenctionplan.
Iiiitlal wte-specilIC coti” we
@Ion pinns,
r8ia”iv7t0 stmrtheLvsessrswmWorking GroupaadWorkingGroup Assessmentlearnsam avsigned,
ReferenceTPdated~ ‘—Cammitmenl’III,C.L pg. w-lo
lFwidmfm”—Comrn3tnrenlnr!c.2, pg. III-10
IP stated41Yb,CommitmentIV.fll, pg. IV-3
rp dated419b,Commitmentfv.B.z pg. IV-3
IP dated4&Jb,.Cornmttrnentfv.EL3, pg.1V4
fP dated41Yb,CommitmentIVJJ.4, pg.1V4
fp dated419bjCommitment~.6.5, pE. lV-5
fpdated4iV6,CommitmentfV,B.6,b.1, pg. IV4
Fi4iied 4/!%,
[V,B.6.b.2, pg. IV-6
ffwitat 4/Yb,
CammibncntV.B.1, pg. V-12
Complete?– niiipEiF—
7/27/1998
‘~n—–”
Complete
6/3w1995
Complete
W26119%
Complefe
10/7/1996
Complete
10/2/1996
Compiele
3/3111997
Complele
7/-31/1996
Complete
7nl/\996
Complete
314119%
Board Contact Mr. Steve Stokes
Der+cr~ptive Strshsswow endotlX OrlwayItr!ated7i2719E.
-—
{cceptedIof closure, Conwayb dated7n9m
XmE5iimmt(mif mmJfit—0
he SDD stalesinkm( to updatehe SDD oncetie WastedarmgernentOrdw isrevised.4eceptexlfor closureConwayII dated7i29Hl
Ep{ed for closure, Lonway
tr dated71241TxJ,
~~ud= the gsudanwnd critcrlufor sitesto usevheoconsideringelispasatIptians wtdchw speclfled asIart of Task [V,B,4. Acceptedor closure Canway lts dtrfed729NM..
%mplete membemhl~Ielked S0UseBosrd 1ssanlM-30 letterdared3/4/96,
—-Due Dnte
_fw% -...
-fo%Tf7199B”‘“-
~-’
-Wml~
TW3Dnw-
-w~
Tmr71997—
-07~
wnTf7l99r--
7mzm9F
I
I ‘9s
1’
k
I ,1! I I
I
Resp,org. EM
ex#
WoZ
,WrJz
194JJT
L9T02
WW02
hi #
Dzz–
-or
.Om.
-02.s
~x.
Ltt #
S(~ely Issues W‘ emenl AystemSumman Recommendation Re~a w Commitment and Action Xnforimation
‘)Recommcnslatiors # KM-02 Conform rnncewith SisfAy Stsndsrds ratLow -Level Nuclear Wswte Disposnl Sites
.,
Reap. Mgr. Mr, Marlhs Lefuurcaernu DR Conhct Mr. Michael Worley llo~rd Contact Mr. .Nevu Stokes
.-. .Commitment Statement —
nanngensentprogramsin LlosrrdaOaeUnl[edTGingdom,%snw, and Sweden,In a repofl.
~[ WIII randetie a pmcc9s10idemdy eserdtalwquiremcnfi ta be included in the Law level WesteC3usp[erofhe mvlaedOrderon Radwctive WasteManagemercL Amajorcomponenlaftlae pracesswill be thefevelopmmt nnddacumcntalionoftlre ba&s fot any essentialrequirernesdslobe incorparaled inta he Order revigion,
A art 1VI -dent”dic.ati6TiiiWrlevGlopSnesdofrcqulrcmesltsb;[LWOm;;gemenL Impkmwata(ionguldansxWN bedeveloped,and necessarydocumentationwill b providedintime10supporttic RarkloaetiveWs+teMcnagcnrentOrderrevision.
TIEappraval pracess[or rad!olog!eat assessmenfi~tea,pesfonnanceassessmesslssodeomposilcanalysts)will beCornrrdizedin orderto makeUsepromsscorwlstentwi]h lhecommibnenls made lrr this ImplemenOstionPlan andwillborne partof the Order revkiart for RadioactiveWasteManagement.
The LSepsoimcnt WIII Issuenskmm cluectconadrkwmg Usec,rl(icat aspcch of mndnelingn pcrfomrrrnccms,essmml.
DOERW preparemd pmviife~isif2s a documentprovMingguidancean USCpreparationof thecompositeanaly9cs,
DOEwill ~epare a~ocumen[cddescrlphon01Us0 process”f6—HcedquarteAreviewof thecompositeassnlysesandthewikwlafor evrdrmtingW acceptability of the analyses.
leport irkmmymg mcnhrdLov+bvcl WasteMaoagemeni
mpliimi IaStonguldsne4ancl:whnicnlatanskrdsto supporl~scntinl LLW manrngcmcntregukmcnts.
Uart 1 glcd aasqsmcnt approwrtp=modifti and thnBllyieve[oped for inclssion in~dkaactive WasteManagement~rder revision,
Pollc.resaddresalngerurcelnssumptkonsend clmiticatkmskmperforrrumeeSsscssmcnU,
Guldarrcefor conductingmmposilc aradyaes
-Ion ot the processand —crltesfa for Herndqusrter’sreviewof mmposile rnnalyses.
Re~erencevIr4*b... z, pg Vl=S
IP drnied 41Yb
Commltraserk’VI,EL5, pg. w-s
fP dated41YbCorruadtment’VIJ3.6, pg. VI-10
VIB!7, pg w-lo
[P dated41YbCommitment’VI1.B.1, pg. WI-5
IP7xEia 4tYb,
CcanmitmeralV1LB,2, pg VIM
IF da(ed4W6,CommitmentvlLll,3, pg. VII-7
-—--—Complete?
‘1
Descript~e Status—
tfosure. conwayltr~’ -7129190.
6/11/1996
Complet8
t--””’
equsremcn are I led rndmff Order 435.1 doesrrr%rtswlsichwere sent10the EtoIsrrfon XHV97.
2128J1997 f
Complele Implcmentsorrrnguidacrwdelivered tq UscBoardwithdratl Order43S.1 on XZ.IV97.
2/28/[ 997
Complclc Includedwith drattOrder 435. Tdocumentswhichwwedciivered ta the Bowelan2t2W97. hr responseto theBoard’s1Prcvlsion aoceptancccondition, Dqsartnmnldiversified the PRP byestab~ishlnga fcrfcrally&afMgroup to revlcw thesadlological=essmerrts Ihe Board wasnotkt ot’these hctbres in a4fiOt97 Icttcrfrom EM-l.
2/28/1997
Complesc LScltvcrnblcsent 10thc Lsoarsron 3/7191 (Reft EM97-0E32).‘Ilris deliverable was deferreduntil fhe cndof Fcbnrarycemsis@rlwiLh theOrderrevisioncffofl A Werto IheBoard informing them of [hedeferreddelivery was sentonV21’97, Ret EM96-04920.
317/1997
Complele—
4/3W 1996 I
11/1/[ 996
Due Dsste_.— ——
-Iizr2wlr
m~
17z2W199r
7nmn99r
-U5f317m6—
‘fQ3mm
—
Resp.Org. EM
———.We #WT-oz
W4~D2-
K94~2-L
794112–
R941E”-
u%42–
R94:02
R94-02–
;mt #
lw-
lJ28--
-om—
-Wzr
-OZ9...
.029-.
029
-029. -
Let #..—.
,0~....
D2.-
103
KM
105
Sujdy Issues V- emwt System
Summarv RecomruemlationReuo v Commitment and Action hformation )Recommendation # R94-02 Co; formnnce with Safety Stnndards at Low -Level Nsrclenr Waste Dispowsl Sites
Re~p. Mgr. Mr, Martin Letaumesu DR Contact Mr. Michael Wadey
Commitrs2esstStatementI-Rmanoe on pertonnarrwassewlren[Mmrmti —
program will specifyerilcrla liorperiodicrevkw d’theperformance sssc9smenta to ensureIhntUsewasteacxxptarscecriteriamd design andopemtimsal~qulremcnts derivedfromtic performance asseacmcntsremain viabf~, as welt as provirk’wite.rlafor rkhxrninlng when revishm 10Urcprxfunnrmclmsmeak are rwcessruy.
llrrce on pertorrnanceassessmcnfi61iiFiiiiifiZ~wIII provide an annotatedouflineof the mattws to be addressedin a perfonmsncc assessment,Includingincorporationofpaformance assessmentreds intowasteacceptancecriterial%eStandardReview Planwill inciudetechnicalderla forIhe Iindirng!tit mrrslbe madeto determinethal a pcrfarmanceassessmentis kchrsically meeplable.
Sitmwmcwalsposal lricdI@s operalingund~ r erSS2D,2Awill prepare perkrrmnnec assesamrmtsbsmxorrhurmwith the requirements or the Order,
si~wmmvalspasal 1acil~@iiing under 00E0xJF
SL120.2Awill preparepcrform~nceassessmentsinaccordance
with the requirementsof Ihe Order.
SiWWW!Jii~WTkN ftmng underWE Urder5~0,2A will pfepareperformanceassessmentsin aeusrdanwwith [he requirementsoflhe Order.
SitKwiUilXJV disposaltacihhcs operatuqgunder UC)EUEiZi-5820,2A will prepareperfbrrnaneeassmmcnts in accordancewhh Ihe requirementsof UseOrder.
SilEEWiihiLLW”dkp~ltiilitk.s operatilijjTuriderDOE UiiT5F5E2CI.2Awill prepareperformanceassessmentsIn wordaercewirh tic requirementsofthc Order,
Slt=Tvilh~Wrdt-~wll it--~E-Ude~5820.2A will prepareperformanceassesmcnrsin acmrdancc
—— ———Deliverssble
PA rnarntelrarm goidanoS -iocunrcnt.
PA fornrrrlandContenl.mrdstandardreview plan docrtrnents.
mr pm ormanceassessment10Hendquartrxsfor rwlew;mmplclc the Headquarhxs[echntcalIevlew anddocurmmlaUon.
SubrmtLANL IA-54, ArenG,per-tbrmaocsassessmeoltoHeadquaetcmfar review.
CtiE@lEtEUiFHFiilquarterstechnical revtew anddocumentationof the LANLrA-54, AreaG, performancesssessmcnt,
CiiijWli-tii6HeadW-@Fri”- ‘-–Ieehrricalreview anddosumentnttonof the R4ELRadioaetivc WasIc Marsagcmcn[Complexperformanceassessment-
LompleteW Headq@emIechntealreview anddacurrumtation of Ihe NTS Area 5Rsdoactive Waste Management!lite pcrttnrsranccasscssmmL
SubmifNfKKfFa~aXIRFWasteManagementSitc
Ileferermm esmed419fiCommitrnenlVILB.4.b.l , p~Vn-tl
w m ed 4/%,
CommitmemVIl,B,4.b.2, pg.VII-8
E-Jdnted4fYb,CommitmentVR.B.S.b.1,pg.VW
IP dated419b,Commitment
V1l.B.5.b.1,pg.W-9
IPrt ated41Y5,CommitmentVILB.5.b.1, p~VII-9
rPmw1796—CommilmenlV[l.B.5,b, i, pg.WI-9
TlwitmmrCommitmentViLB.5.b.l , pg.vt[-9
TPilatcd 4/Yb,
Gmrmsitment
Complete?complete
10/ 1/19%
Ump]e!e
11/ l/1996
Upen
uompitie
41311997
Open
—C6ii@lC
8/3D/19%
Complete
8/30/1996
U3mp!ctc
Board CssntcctMr. Steve Stokes
Descriptive Stntus
n response10me Baarms lP-evislonacceptancecondltkmnmplctrxl this deliverable:mrly.
rhe M l’A wvlewed ~Y)crobm 3! , i998.
(evlcw cOsnpliXed,cl Osrrrc
M= irnmhwru.
Tw Secamnclldcd armraViii~
uly meeting. PA s&ptrdvithconditions. Aeccpted fo:Iosure. Ckmway k daled‘129J’EM.
ZWZ@Eti*itlGtiiiiR16iK!ccapted for closure. Conw8tr dated7L2W%3.
w Utwwloft/c onway 1~iated 512719E.Actepled for
Due Datewmn9!m
31/317199T—
7umT995—
-027317r997-
--W/317 W9if---
--~%...
-uS73T719r
7)37317W9r
.. .. ,
)Rmp. {)rg. t3M
Rec II
R94=+
R94312-
IWTOr
R94~2-”
Rmi
2–
R9+02”
I,
—.—.~mt H—— . . . .
~r-.
lsz9—
32F
mr
D2Y—
W2r
029–
Act $
m-
JLrT
lor
MT
Hr
IT
)12”-
Sajety Issues W- ement SystemSummaw Recommendation Rem ev Commitment and Action Information )Recommendation # R94-02 Conformance with Safety Stslndards at Low -Level Nuclenr Wde Disposnl Sites
Reap. Mgr. Mr. Martin LeMumeau DR Contact Mr. Midsacl Wartcy
Commitment Statement ‘“WTi3ThFFFquimnsentso! UseUrrIw.
SiE~w~”T.LW dispo9mlacditlcs qwrating under1~. Urder5820.2A will prcpws performmcc msscssmenls h oecorkrca
whh sbc requirementsofthc Order:
Slleswth LLW d@iiiW-@ilItreS operatingmsderDUE U rder
5E20.2A willprep.weperfmmanseassessmentsin accordancewilh the rsqrrireme.rrtsor Ihe Ordw,
SiK@itf~qkm.nl 1acililie9 operating under WE Urder
5S20.2A will prepare performance ~~mcnts in msxwdanccwilh Urcrequirementsof he Order,
sites wdh LLW disposal tMcllrtlesOptxatmg under LJuB UsuerS820,2A will preparepm+onmmceasseasmcrrtsIn rnccmrdanccwith the requirwrsenksor the Order,
smwffmwalspw tfrCIIffICS0pcr8t05g unti NE 0-d er5820,~ will pwpare perfidrmsnceawrssmcntsIn mxmrdrancewi(tr lhc requirssmm(sof ttm Order,
SttMi5XNhiispcrsal tOcMilies opwsflng under t3UE or&f
S820,2A will pmparrepsrforrnararn Suscssmcrrtsin accordrsrwM“ththe requirementsof theOrdei.
Siti%FdhiKjZKiilliEiElities opefatmgsrnstcrtR3E UrderSS20,2A will prepare perfmrrurnceasmssmentshraccmdasrcccviUrthe requirementsof theOrder.
Deliverableper~onnsmccassessment(inclrrdhrgcomposite mudysis) toHeadquastemfar review.
Coiriiemm%iisiiuiimi-”Icchraicel review andducumerrtotlan af the NTS Arms3Radioaetivc WasleManragcmwalSite pcrfarrnrsnceassessment.
!$iUi S I[d \Vo askSmage Area-d peKornsan&assessmerdto Headquaatwsfarreview.
CEiii@eie Ihe Headquarlers(eehrdrsdreviewanddocumcritalionafthc ORNLSolid Waste StorageAm-6 I@armanee a.wessmcrrh
Camplele ihe Headqwsrtemtechnicalreview anddocumentationaf the Hantlmt2f10-WBurial Groundpeffarrnsrrceassessment,
Srshmdme HantordMU-E tmsrialGroundperforwsanbssssssmesrt~aHesdqutitm ror tiicw,
Complete k Herndquarkrstechnlea! review anddocumeniutionofthc Hanford2tH3-E9urial Gaundperfbmmoce assessmerrL
Complete (lie HerutqusrtcrStechnical ruvlcw anddocurncnaatlono(lhe SRSSaltsloneDlsprmdFacilityperfornwna assessment.
Referencems b.i. PGVII-9” a
IPifated 4FJ6,Comrni!menlV1l.fl.5,b. 1,pg.WI-9
lFtlaled 4/%Coraowilrneml’*fl.f3.5.b. 1, pg.vff-9
IP dat rtWfiiLMm;itnrent’VU.B.5,b. 1,pg.vff-9
Vfl.B.5.b. 1,pg,VII-9
w daIcdWY6.
VD.B.5,b, 1, pg.WI-9
W (la&d 4fYb,
VI[.i3.5,b.1,pg.WI-9
1PMc(I 41Yb,CommitmentVII.B.S.b.l , pg,VII-9
Complete?
5)271199R
Uw –
miii@it---’”-
9i3wi997
Upen
Uonrplc(e –
6t2711996
Complete
8/30/1996
Complete
6130/1997
Lmmplcu
EtonrdCorrtacf Mr, Stsvc Siokcs
Descriptive Stntu3closure, Conway 1(sdined7129198.
In progress.Kewew team has
completedosltcvisit and igevsfuatingtheperfarrnanccassessmentand compasileanalysis,
PA submmion was repted ma Ictterto the Bond on Octabe16, 1997.
in progress,KevW tr!mrshascompleted a sitr visitand iscvsltra!ing(hepetiormarwassessmrmt.
Acceptedttrrclosure, ConwayItrdated 7L19AM.
(mnmmmlq Bawl Wrssnollficd of adelay by an EM-1lctterdated 4130i97 (Ref.EM%41494E). Acccptcd ~orclosarrc. Comvay Ifs dated7n9i98.
I’A roundSsch-iiIcrsuyacceptableexsept[orgrwndwatnr rmalysls- moreansfysisis being requested.Formal dOSSUS\\’hh dre Boardwillbe proposedwhewtheadditionalgrerundwatcrandysisinformationh reeeived andrcvicwcd for
Due Date
–ltOTfl19YfT
-w730/f99T
-lulf511WK
7Tt73ufT9Yfi
-ow3rTr99fi
7M7YUlr99T
--07131-f19%-
, ,.,
)RrJp. Org. EM
——M
mr
m
mT
004
005
006
007
S#ety Issues W- etne?lt SysiefnSummaw Recommendation Reno v Commitment and Action Information
)Reeossrsnendntion # R94-02 Conformance with Safety Stan d~rds at Low -~vel Nuclear Wiste Disposoi Sites
ResP. Nfgr. hti. Martin Letaomcau DR Carr(rnct MI. Miclml \Vorley
Coromitmerst Statememt—.
fliiiIEFWili prepare rI eompasite rmrnlyws.
fle SIRSWlnpreparea composttcarrasysls.
me siks wrll pRpare a eorrrposrteanrn5ysls.
The siks wll prepsre a composl(e”Snasysis.
TiiiT3itEEEpm meornprte analysls.
ThWiiEiiill prefwe a compcmte rum!ysis.
TlEXifF9ivitl pqmre a comprmleanalysls
TIK TdtEiwill@epa~ a usmtmsitearmlysis,
I .. --- —
—— —.Deliverable
Submslcomposlk annlyses 10Headquartersfor review;completethe Headqtiers!eebrricalreview mddocsmrentatforn,
eompostte analyses to
Headqwters ftrr review,
Complete the H eamtuarmkdrricttl review anddocosrwotatlonof thet.ANLTA-54, Area G, eosoposkearrsJyses. .
Submit INEl, Kadloactrw \vasteMrsna@sreolCompfex wsnpoaltearmfy.!esto Headquartsusfbrreview.
Lhmplelc tne Hcastquarkrs(eehnieafdew anddocutncrrtntksnof theINflRadioactiveWasteMsmrrgcmrmtComplex compositeanalyses.
Subrrss(OreNTS A rem>Rndloee[ivcWasteMasragsmenlSite ixmpoake analysestoftcadqu~em ror revi~w,
~mpicle the Headquartms –teetrn]catI_CVkW anddocumentation of he NTS Area 5RadloactivcWasteManagementSitB comfro.viteanalyses.
SiiL-riilroii s oltrl\VasteSimsge Area+Seamposkannlyses to HeadquarlessforWvkw,
Reference
fPcinted4196,CommitmentVtI.B.5.b.2, fl&WI-9
w dalwl 41?JbCmrmrilment’Vfl.B.5.b.2, pg.VII-9
fP dated 4/96Gqmmibswrl’VllJ3.3.b2, pg.VII-9
Vt[.B,5.b.2, p~VII-9
IF doted4/%,
Vll,B.5.b,2, pg,VII-9
1Pslated 4iYtI,
VfLB.5 .b,2,pg.vfl-9
IF dated496Commitment’Vl[,B,S,b.Z PEvt19
Wdated4iYb,
lCkmlmitment”Vtl.B.5.b.2, pg.WI-9
Compfete? -—
7)31/1996
Upen
Upert
LJpen
open
Lmmplele
9/30/1997—
Board Codrnct Mr. Steve Stokes
Dsxicripfive Sttstsrs
Cl@ file.tirlWfiy li3 dakel7n91!?8.
1 he Iasi composite arratyslsrevie\*cd by June30,2000,
Rev Iew completed. CIOsureletter imminent,
1ssprogress. 1he compsslteanafytis fm.sbeendelivered tof3Q. But no[yet aceepledbyIfreLFRG.
f%iidirrg, KCvlew team and
teader witl be sdeckd 10supportreview orthc docusnenlwhich was&1 Ivcred in May1998,
In progress. \Vork IIss begunon dctlnlrsgthe boundariesofthe rrrea(a be inefudedin the --compositeSnalysis.
t%rmrrg, ‘raskWlil Slml uponSecelptorb Composltcsrrmlysis.
CA submissionwas rcportefia ktter to the Boardon Octobclf6, i997.
-
Due Ditte
–mm--
+3r?l+
TfimT99r
-057r5/r999--
=09D07T99!T-
w3?3072005—
—wmlFNT--
B,, ,,
)RcrIp.Or& EM “
———Lec 1)~“
K9mT
RlWU2”
R9TOZ
R-”
K9WJ2
R9V02
R!M412
‘mi #~.
D30–
W3r
TUo–
7t31r
031
lr3[–
ur
lQl—-
w2–
Safety Issues W-= emenr System
Summarv Recommendation Reua w Commitment and Action Information )Recommendation # R94-02 Conformance w.th Safety st~rrdnrds at Low -Level Nsrclenr Waste Dhposal Sks
.
Resp. Mgr. Mr. Masiin Letourneau DR CmrtrnctMr. MWZWI Wmtcy
—Commitment Statement —
rmwiiwtr~i=5pfc 8 composW SOEIK31S.——. —
TliEil~itl pscpsueSIcomposrle analyslsl
~tcs will preparea composite esmlysls.
The sltcswII1 prepare a comporme analym
-si~%ll prepruea eompositcanmiysls.
71EEEBfii@~i%NaIoglcal sssessmcn((e.g., FA and compositema[ysls) will be reviewed andfmn k basisfor issuanceofthe disposrdauthorization statemcrr!10doeurnwrl my Hmitsondesign prapcrs!irnrs for the fscillty,
The completerSil!o~lcal esessment{c.B.,S’Asodeomposl(c
srsatysis) will k reviewedmd formthebasisfor Issuanceofihe disposalrnrrlhorhtionstrntemerrtto docronenl MY limils ondmigrror opcredons for the.frnclhy.
TtkkFEiFJlolog]crd assessment(e.g., PA and oompos~ewmlysis) will be rcvlewed smdform he basb for iwraim of
Dalivernble RetkrenceUomplelc the llcarIquarters 1Pdated K&6_”
(CCblliCd lCViCW and ‘ Cammilmerrl’documentation ofthc ORNL VIIB.5.b.2, pg.Solid WasIWStorrngcAren4 VII-9compositsanalyses,
Submli Orc Hmlor ti-t5 IL W W stated4/Yb,burls! Gmsmds& Envlronmenbd CornmltmcntRcstoratton DisposrnlFacility VILB,$.b.2, p~,composik analysisto W-9Hcadquarlem fordetv.
~Pl* * Heaclqwmea JPdrsled*JWtechntealreviewand Commhzsrersl’doersmeaebchofthc Hanford VILEt,9,b2, pg.200-E A W Burial Grounds& VII-9Env, Iicsl, Disp. Fm. compxlltanalysis.
SubmIt ttESRYWire a Vssulfs W datc~andthe SrnlLSlOrSCDisposal ComrrdbrrmiPacility compmk mstysis 10 V’fLB,S.b.Z pg.Hcadqumlessfof review, vr19
Complcsetme Headquarters W slatedW6 ,teclrnlcatreviewsssd Coemsrifmenidoesemcntetionoftbc SRS E-Aren VDf3.5,b.2, pg.Vaults endSmltsroncDisposal WI-9Feall ky composik analysis.
ms$oml rwthorlzahon 1F datcx!4/967stetemcntor dkcclion to resolve Cmrrrnllmcnlissuesor concernsfor LANL VlL6.5,b,3, pg.TA-54, Areo G. WI-9
issue dbpowdauthorization 1PdaterS 4EJb,
SbitcrrKnl or directtonto resol~c Corrrrrdtnwnt
Complete?
UP
Ltpcn
upen
Complete
10/30/1997
Uw
Tpcn
Upen
Upen
Board Contnct Mr Skvc Stokes
D~crip~ve Status~m- l@vTw Seemtw -cnmpleteda site visil nndisevaluatingtic oampositsenafysis.
In progress, ‘1M site ssbmi
Rmp. Org. EM
lec n
mm
[g4:02-
W4mT
W4=02-
W4-m2“
Wtzrz
W4m-
~.~”
mH-
m--
TLJl—
m31—
~,-.
’03r
031—
~3z_..
ict H---
~m-–
~—.
lor-
Sur
307—
uo8—
~9.–
Sajety Issues V - ement SystemSummaw Recommendation Rem ev Commitment and Action Information )Recommendation # R98-02 Conform nnce with Sretkty Strsrrdards at f.Asw-Level Nuclear }Vssste Disposal Sites
Rmp. Mgr. Mr. MwshsLetoumeau DR Contact Mr. Michael Woriey Brierd Co~tact MI. Steve Stokes
—-——Commitment Statement
i5iti-iti9p0Wl3dh6fbitiotiem~lo ifoTui ahylhilb=ndesignoropcmtiom fbr rlrefacllily
The-de ramologwalrkssessmenl[e.g., YA andcampoadE—
arurlysis) will bi rGvkwxl and form the tmis fbr Iswranw ofUSCdisposalauthorizationstatementto dotumcntany limits andesignor aperalions fbr the frndlity.
ThF=~eiie-fXIii5io@iTms=smFnt (e.g., FA——
andcomprmte
analysis) wIII be mvlevmd andform thebasisfor ksuarw oftie disposa!auttmrkmtioh Matemesrlto documcrrlSOYlimits ondesignoroper~tis for the Om!llty.
l%c completeradK@gXZd_ssswrmn( [e.g. PA andCOMpOSltC
analysis)will k wviewcd and form lhe bosisfor tssuamxofIhe dispowrlaselhorizatirmstalement,lo,documentany limits ondesignor operationstirr Usehcillty. ,
-t-Emi@ete rodtaloglcal assessment(e.g., FA aridoomposkeanalysls)will be reviewed andfm Orebasisfor iwranec ofthe disposal Mmrization statementto document any limits 0ssde~ignoropcrrdionsfor the facility.
IliFcomplcteradiok)glcal assessrnemt(w., PA ma eomposwearsdyh) wil! k reviewed aordformthe bask for issrraneeofshedkpa.mtaurhorlzirtionsmbmrcntto doeumcnlairylimits ondesignor operatiom.forOrefacllky.
~plete Kulofo’glca! assessmcoi (e.g.. t’A andcompositemsalysls)will be swtewsd and form the bssls for Issuanceofthe disposalauthorltion sblcmcnlia documentany limits ondcslgn oropcrelions far the tbcility.
The asrnplc=io[ogmsl nssmment {e.g. FA and com~~analysis)willberevlcwcd and fbrmUrcbasinfor Lwrranccofthedigposrdauthorizationslstcmcn( soducumcmany 1imik ondesignor apemtlansfor Usefacility.
C~acilyi–i-n this Implcmcnlatian Han, addressesmequantityaf bathvolume and mdlanuclirteinvenso~that SJMbcacwpted ata dlspasaifacility. The initlnl LLW dispbsaicapacilyrcporlwill ardy includeinforrnntianonvcdumctriccapacily
Deliverablei99m3 or concernslar INELRadlaec[iveWastefWmagcmcrrtComples.
lKuedIspJsoSaullrorrzatwnstatcmerslor dlrectian so resolveissues or carrcernsfmthctVIXArea 5 RadioacdveWasteManagement Site.
miimiiprd SuttlOr-izatlozlstntemcntor dkcciimtto redveLensesor eonccmstbrtfteNTSArea 3 Radoactivs \VasteMarsageriwrrl Site.
lE4iiEdlspa9rrSrwrlhorlzatranstatsmerdor direction10resolveissuesw conetmsfar theORNLSolid Wazte StorageArea-d.
IiiiEihsposat authorizationstatement or dhetian to rsnolvcissuesor mnrcansfar theHanford 200-W Burlrd(hounds.
-tsposal authorizationstatementor stlrectkmto resolvelssri~ or conw.ros rOttheHrmrord 200-E flurfsd Qmussds,
ksue d!sprrsalaothonzaSeon
statementor direc{ionto resolveissuesar canecmsfor ttrkSavrmrIrdrRwer E-Ares VEUIK.
IKiEdT@aJ aulhorizatlanstakrmotor dircetlanto resolveissuesor eonecmsfortbaSavannahRiver SaltWmeDlsposd Fcdllty,
bw-Lcvcl WasteLxsposalCapacity Repot Revision O.
Reference—.. .
~> P&VII:9 ‘
b,
CommitmentVl[.B,5.b,3, pgVIM
mmm9K--CornmitmenlVCLB.5,b3, pgvrf-9
VILfJ,5,b.3, pg.VII-9
P dated41YbohsmitmentVI[.B,5.b.3, p%W-9
P drsted4#b%rrzmltmcnl’W,B.5.b,3,pg,W-9
~d 1 rS4M
b~itrnent’
W1.B.5,b3, pg.W-9
1Pdated 4/%, –
hrmitmcntVU.B.5.b.3, pg.VIL9
wdalcd 4N6 c iVnLB.1.b,l, ~g,m ‘
vn14
Complete? rI.Wcriptie Stntus_— .——- ———— .— .
+-
1
Upers
Upcn
7’en ending, aviewseamfeeder
hasbeen se[r@c&rcv}ewwill,.,rsnnmtxscein August 19911
Tpen en urg. ZToxvteam Scadcrhasbeenselected;revkw willrxxrrsnenrzin August 1998,
IUpen In pragrsss.
I
I
txsmpleta
t-
ccep c EEb3aurc, CorrwnyItrdsded7t2919K
Drte Date
7Jh7Jf20LiT-
-—rozw1993—
-lB7137E?Jr
-Q3731Ji9Yf--
-uT’mlwr
~r99s-
-u97301mr
-DT73r7T996-
8,?: \
.)RespOrg, EM
_——-Iec #W4=02”
W4-nr
X!J$T2-
W?m
R5f4%T
Uml
=
—---
~mt #-or
-03r
mS-
-r
m3r
-038-.
-m---
..\ct #.—
——
—
Safely Issues ~“ - emnt S’yste)n
Summarv Recommendation ReDo ey Commitment and Action Information ),Rerommendis!ion4 R94-02 Conformance with Safety Stmsdnrds d Low -f.mel Nuclear Waste Disposnl Sites
Rcsp. Mgr. MT. Msrh Letaumemu DR COEIICI Mr. MlelIw4 Wofley I
Commlhnent Stdement
Mrently avm[hblc mndphrmedRWiiHKt_ CWCIIY
will be de[crminedby Snsdyzingsiteenvironmental drnte andutilizing pathwBy analysis modeling techniques. ‘l_herrndiologicalcBpacitysnd pmjcction will be mntained in !he
hst ravlslcm of tie disposal eqmctty report ascorssldemllonofradiologicalsource terms Ermretfccrsdin theradiologicalwes9menls.
Basedon few-level wssle mvento~ andprajectl Ons
information andthe mssveyof CUITGIS1rotdplanned~ow-lcvel.
wsstc disposalcispacity(Tuk VIII.B.1), a DDE low-levelwastepmjectirm progmm w[libe develo~d,
=yWTITbE conducted10deiermine the eomman LLW”gencrailngae~vi!ic~01m$or DOE sltq sodidentifi practlca,procedures,policies and tedmiqsses tlrnt am cffeclive hl
~ducing LLW.
A surveywiil M conaucsedlallenlll’y ose~where msisksare appl icableto LLW mrnmsgementpmgnsrnimpmvemenls.
LLWRED needswill be idenhheei W-IJ , qdser9%2lrnplcmcn~lon PlanM groups, and with input from otherDOE-\vide R&D or kcfmolagy devcto~men( programs.
Tti=artiii163URtZidlRijiRdC ~nlcnds to puiarm asystema~lcwoaswalk betwcn needs mid acdvhics (grnpsnstysis)and w this asascreeno[lhe steal identified In tmsk1X.9.2, In saseswherk R&D needsare beingrnddmssed,thesewill be docunwsslcdand providedIOhe LLW rnasragcnswdprogmnrwith rccommendntlonsonhow to S.wimlkatetheirresults,
A comprelsemve strslegy Formeetingouislamding LLW RZi3Tneeds will be ~cloped fw the LLW ManagementTaskGroup. The stra[egy wlli be.&velaped far khssion, mnppmprl ate, in the LL\V PmgmsnMansgcrnsruPian.
——.—_
DeliverableLo L4wekW&rSJ id@%-cityRqsort~Re%& 1.
DDE LOW-LWSI \vasicPmjcction Pm8wsrnDoswrnentstkm.
kva[usdsonana stratcgy rolImprovements to LLWminimization.
PselienlnaryLLW mnmsgesnssdIUD selivftiescabstagfbr initialneedsMentifledby the Board.
mw tum meedsstatenserrl
kEiitKRc=ionof outstamwsgR&D nods.
w mwro~ m OsstslanskrsgLLW lcchnicfd and R&D mxds.
ReferenceWd ated4W6, LmrLVIILB.1 .b.z p&VIM4
IF dated 41Yb.
VIWB.2, pgl vw
fP erssled4tY6Commilnwnl’
VflLBJ pg. VII I-5
W dated 4tYbCommitment’lX.B.1, pg. 1X4
fpila~ WtI,CammilsnenlL%B.2, pg. L+s
W d ted 41YbCmamltment’1X.6.3, p& 1X-5
,, ,
1P dated 4195
Commk.nmnt’IX.B.4, pg. 1X4
Complete?Lompkte
911711998
Complete
12/26/1996
L2snsplelc
600/1996
compieie
613W1995
Coroplcle
4116/1997
Uctmplsle
Ii 1/1996
Upen
Board Contact MI, SteveStokes
Descriptive Strntus~ ,:9f17198.
Accepted t01closure. (xsrswsy
I&dated 7t29198.
DsStt StpOIt W8S dL?cUS.WWith
BoardStutTB/1/96, Ammpsniomreporton mixedLLW n-sinisnkdionwas senl ~ihc Bomrdon 12/26/%Acceptedfar closure. Conwaylb dated 7t29f9fl.
Re.vI@ VCTSIDllWSS
rembmlttedalong with themeedsassemmen[an 4/l M’97.Acceptedfur closure. ConwayI&dated 7/29/98.
Reti Em~,r–—
icceplcd far closure. ConwayI[rdakd 7t29198.
REE-mflts [Oconwayor--1WI198, - --
!aretegy anamplcmcnrsdlonprocessto bedeveloped by12/31/98.
Due DateW!m7m
-12T3m!PJ6--
--U8K17199r
T6T3wTwr
-u3/317T997-
-OW3W19!J8--