quality of working life – what, how and why quality of working life – what, how and why mr...
TRANSCRIPT
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Quality of working life – Quality of working life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
Mr Simon Easton & Dr Darren Van Laar, Applied Psychology UnitDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth
1
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Career choice
Stress management
Career change
Quality of Working
Life
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
“Without doubt, the most important determinant of QWL is career achievement, followed by career satisfaction and career balance.”
Rose R C, Beh L, Uli J and Idris K (2006) Quality Of Work Life: Implications Of Career Dimensions. Journal of Social Sciences 2 (2): 61-67
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
What?
A review of the literature reveals relatively little on quality of working life.
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
What?
A review of the literature reveals relatively little on quality of working life.
Where quality of working life has been explored, writers differ in their views on the core constituents.
Taillefer,-Marie-Christine; Dupuis,-Gilles; Roberge,-Marie-Anne; Le-May,-Sylvie (2003) Health-related quality of life models: Systematic review of the literature. Social-Indicators-Research. 64 (2): 293-323
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Quality of Working Life is the greater context in which to understand various factors in the workplace such as job satisfaction and stress.
A proper understanding of the bigger picture would offer opportunity for better informed interventions for individuals and at an organisational level.
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
We looked at the literature, and talked with the organisations we work with and came up with:
7*Van Laar, Edwards & Easton (2007)
‘Quality of Working Life is that part of overall quality of life that is influenced by work… the widest context in which an employee would evaluate the influence of work on their life.’*
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
How?How?
We set out to develop a valid and reliable scale to measure QoWL.
We started with our working definition to help define the scope of a scale.
We drew upon theoretical definitions of QoWL (Herzberg, Loscocco & Rochelle, Sirgy, Warr,etc.)
We had access to related scales, our own staff survey data and job experts
8
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk 9
200 questions were gathered from existing surveys or generated based on theoretical requirements, and reviewed by an expert panel to give an item pool of 61 questions.
The questionnaire was given to over 1000 employees of the UK National Health Service, and EFA and CFA on the two halves were undertaken.
The data sets were combined (N = 953) to confirm a 6 factor structure with 23 items (Overall C’s α = .91) and show a ‘good’ model fit for the ‘Work-Related Quality of Life’ (WRQoL) scale which appeared to be a valid and reliable scale with good psychometric properties.
How: Development of a measureHow: Development of a measure
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) scale factors
Job Career Satisfaction (JCS) : α = .86How far you agree that you are generally happy with your ability to do your workGeneral Well Being (GWB) : α = .89How much you agree you feel generally content with life as a wholeHome-Work Interface (HWI) : α = .82How far you agree that the organisation understands and tries to help you with pressures outside of workStress at Work (SAW) : α = .81How far you feel agree you experience stress at workControl at Work (CAW) : α = .81How far you agree you feel you are involved in decisions that affect you at workWorking Conditions (WCS) : α = .75The extent you agree that you are happy with conditions in which you work
10
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk 11
Home
Work
Individual
Quality of Life
The Big Picture………
Control at Work
Home-Work
Interface
General Well-Being
Stress at Work
*Van Laar, Edwards & Easton (2007)
Quality ofWorking
Life
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
What best predicts Overall QoWL?What best predicts Overall QoWL?Question or factor t Sig.
General Well-Being (GWB) 16.205 0.001
I am able to achieve a healthy balance of work and home 14.805 0.001
Working Conditions (WCS) 9.606 0.001
I am satisfied with my job 9.572 0.001
I feel my job is secure 8.522 0.001
I enjoy my work 7.339 0.001
I would recommend this organisation as good to work for 6.388 0.001
My work is as interesting and varied as I would want it to be 4.087 0.001
The quality of supervision is as good as I would want it to be 3.979 0.001
Good Relationships 3.531 0.001
Stress at Work (SAW) -3.275 0.001
…
(17th) I am paid fairly for the job I do, given my experience 2.11 0.035
12
Multiple Regression, with dependent variable: q65: I am satisfied with the overall quality of my working life. R2 = .75, N = 5500.
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Patterns underlying overall quality of working lifePatterns underlying overall quality of working life
13a to i = individual quality of working life quality of working life report patterns
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
GWB HWI JCS CAW WCS SAW Overall(q65)
%A
gre
e
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
WRQoL factors help identify positive and negative aspects of someone’s work experience
Reliable and valid assessment of those key QoWL factors will provide required information for career guidance, coaching and therapy interventions
……..To improve current employment
or
……..Help identify what alternative jobs might be more suitable to the individual.
Why?Why?
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
Work-Related Quality of Life’ (WRQoL) scale
15
Individual reports
Organisational surveys
Research – we need you!
The WRQoL scale can be available for research courtesy of QoWL Ltd, a University of Portsmouth spin out company.
Go to; www.qowl.co.uk for more information.
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk 16
Home
Work Individual
Quality of
Life
The Big Picture………
Control at Work
Home-Work
Interface
General Well-Being
Stress at Work
*Van Laar, Edwards & Easton (2007)
Quality ofWorking
Life
Cultural &Social &EconomicEnvironment?
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk 17
Simon Easton & Dr Darren Van Laar
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, [email protected]
With thanks to QoWL Ltd.
Try it! Email me to get your own individual report with a free voucher code:
That’s it - Thanks for listeningThat’s it - Thanks for listening
Quality of Working Life – Quality of Working Life – what, how and whywhat, how and why
www.port.ac.uk
ReferencesReferences
Van Laar, D. L., Edwards, J. A. & Easton, S. (2007). The Work-Related Quality of Life (QoWL) scale for Healthcare Workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 60(3), 325-333.Edwards, J. A., Webster, S., Van Laar, D. and Easton, S. (2008). Psychometric analysis of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool, Work & Stress, 22(2), 96 - 107.Edwards, J., Van Laar, D.L., Easton, S, Kinman, G. (2009) The Work-Related Quality of Life scale for Higher Education Employees. Quality in Higher Education. 15. 3. 207-219
18