quality assurance review team oral exit report district accreditation murray county schools february...

35
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District District Accreditation Accreditation Murray County Murray County Schools Schools February 26-29, 2012

Upload: sophia-washington

Post on 13-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report

District AccreditationDistrict AccreditationMurray County SchoolsMurray County Schools

February 26-29, 2012

© 2010 AdvancED

AdvancED AdvancED

AdvancED is a global leader in advancing excellence in education through continuous improvement, organizational effectiveness, and accreditation.

The AdvancED CommunityThe AdvancED Community

World’s Largest Educational Network 27,000 public and private schools

throughout the United States and 69 countries worldwide

All Department of Defense schools 15 million students 18 thousand volunteers More than 3 million teachers

© 2010 AdvancED

AdvancED is ComprehensiveAdvancED is ComprehensiveAccreditation

Public, Non-public, Post-Secondary, International

Professional Learning Conferences, Workshops, Training, e-Learning

Innovation Research, Product Innovation, Knowledge

Management, Strategic Partnerships, Marketing

Information & Education Technologies IT Infrastructure, Web-based Management,

Education Technologies, Development & Support

© 2010 AdvancED

DistrictDistrictAccreditation Accreditation ProcessProcess

District AccreditationDistrict Accreditation

An international protocol for school districts committed to systemic, systematic, and sustainable improvement– Builds capacity of the district and its schools

to increase and sustain student learning– Stimulates and improves effectiveness and

efficiency throughout the organization

© 2010 AdvancED

District AccreditationDistrict Accreditation

A systems approach to improvement unified, coordinated, and integrated manner in

pursuit of a shared district vision Promotes continuous improvement Strengthens efforts to meet accountability

requirements Encourages growth beyond compliance to

achieve excellence

© 2010 AdvancED

Cornerstones of AccreditationCornerstones of Accreditation

Meet Standards for Organizational Effectiveness School Systems Schools

Engage in Continuous Improvement Systems Perspective and Approach

Demonstrate Quality Assurance Internal Assessment External Review

© 2010 AdvancED

AdvancED AdvancED Accreditation Standards for Quality SystemsAccreditation Standards for Quality Systems

1. Vision and Purpose2. Governance and Leadership3. Teaching and Learning4. Documenting and Using Results5. Resources and Support Systems6. Stakeholder Communications

and Relationships7. Commitment to Continuous

Improvement© 2010 AdvancED

Expectations for Accreditation Expectations for Accreditation

Meet the AdvancED Standards for Quality Systems Identify and guide the implementation of a systemic

continuous improvement process Monitor its schools and departments through the

quality assurance process Prepare and host a QAR every five years Respond to findings from the QAR Team

© 2010 AdvancED

For a School District

Expectations for Accreditation Expectations for Accreditation

Meet the AdvancED Standards for Quality Schools Implement the district’s continuous improvement

process with fidelity Participate in the district’s quality assurance process

© 2010 AdvancED

For a School

Expectations for Accreditation Expectations for Accreditation

District leadership establishes and implements practices to support schools and departments Direction: sets expectations and provides

guidelines Assistance: builds understanding and develops

skills Resources: provides people, materials, time and

funds

© 2010 AdvancED

Quality Quality Assurance Assurance ReviewReview

Quality Assurance - External ReviewQuality Assurance - External Review

The QAR team Is comprised of professional peers with diverse

experience and rich contextual perspective Assesses and evaluates district effectiveness in

meeting the requirements of accreditation

The QAR process provides the district and its community with

Important validation and recognition Valuable feedback and direction for improvement

© 2010 AdvancED

Activities of the QAR TeamActivities of the QAR Team Reviewed Standard Assessment Report and District

Website Listened to District Presentations Interviewed District Stakeholders Examined Artifacts Visited a Representative Sample of Schools Observed Practices and Learning Environment Collected and Organized Data

© 2010 AdvancED

Activities of the QAR TeamActivities of the QAR Team Engaged in Analysis and Deliberations

Sought and maintained a systems perspective Examined the district’s actions and results in relation

to its vision, mission, and beliefs Pursued evidence that could be corroborated

through multiple sources Used evidence to guide discussions, and reach

decisions Applied the accreditation criteria and requirements

© 2010 AdvancED

Data CollectionData CollectionDuring the on-site Quality Assurance Review, team members visited 8 schools and interviewed: 3 Board members 31 Administrators142 Teachers/Instructional Staff/Counselors 23 Support staff 45 Parents, community, and business partners 69 Students

TOTAL Stakeholders 313

© 2010 AdvancED

Quality Assurance Team FindingsQuality Assurance Team Findings

The QAR TeamThe QAR Team

The QAR Team delivers high quality feedback by: Assessing each standard, writing narratives describing

evidence, highlighting strengths and opportunities for improvement

Providing commendations that identify and celebrate significant accomplishments in meeting or exceeding standards

Defining required actions to help improve district effectiveness and student learning

Communicating findings orally and in writing Making an accreditation recommendation for national review

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

Stakeholders share a meaningful vision of excellence that is embedded in the culture and serves as a source of pride for the community. This emphasis helps the district achieve desired results by ensuring all stakeholders are compelled by a common belief that, collectively, all stakeholders play a role in the success of the district.

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

Progressive administrative and teacher leadership teams promote equitable learning opportunities for all students and are highly responsive to community expectations. This leadership culture allows the district and its stakeholders to continue to focus on the district’s core purpose of excellence in education that permeates the entire community.

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

Continuous learning is expected and valued for all staff members of the district. This expectation clearly supports the ongoing improvement of teaching and learning, as well as the capacity of the district to sustain continuous improvement.

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

An exemplary level of service and dedication of employees is evident throughout the system. This strong support and commitment permits the district to focus on resources and services necessary to support its vision and purpose and to ensure achievement for all students.

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

The district utilizes multiple quality mechanisms for communication, as well as seeking the input of stakeholder groups. This communication allows the district to create a culture that fosters relationships with and among its stakeholders.

© 2010 AdvancED

CommendationsCommendationsThe Quality Assurance Review Team commends Murray County Schools for:

A systemic and systematic process for the analysis of data has been established for instructional and organization decision-making. The analysis of this data forms the foundation for instructional improvement for subgroups and cohorts of students within the district. Performance indicators are utilized at the district, school, classroom, and student level.

© 2010 AdvancED

Required ActionsRequired ActionsThe Quality Assurance Review Team has determined that Murray County Schools must act on the following:

The district must continue with strategic planning processes to determine how to efficiently and effectively utilize existing resources for improvement and growth. Collaboration, planning, and school improvement initiatives within grade levels, across grade levels, and across program levels will require time, resources, and organizational agility.

© 2010 AdvancED

Required ActionsRequired ActionsThe Quality Assurance Review Team has determined that Murray County Schools must act on the following:

Continued attention must be given to trends and patterns of learning and achievement by the various accountability subgroups so that instructional practices are both monitored and improved in response to the patterns that emerge.

© 2010 AdvancED

Standards RubricsStandards RubricsHighly Functional

© 2010 AdvancED

The district is exceptional in its demonstration of the standard and exhibits practices not commonly found in other schools. A small percentage of districts have standards ratings at this level.

The district is demonstrating the standard and using practices commonly found in other schools. Many districts have standards ratings at this level.

Operational

Emerging

Not Evident

The district is beginning to put in place the practices necessary to meet the standard but is not meeting it. Many districts have standards ratings at this level.

The district has not put practices in place or beginning efforts to meet the standard. Some districts have standards ratings at this level.

Ratings by StandardRatings by Standard

© 2010 AdvancED

Standard Rating

Vision and Purpose

Governance and Leadership Highly Functional

Teaching and Learning

Documenting and Using Results

Resources and Support Systems

Stakeholder Communications and Relationships

Commitment to Continuous Improvement

Highly Functional

Operational

Operational

Highly Functional

Operational

Operational

Standards EvaluationStandards Evaluation

© 2010 AdvancED

3

4

0

0

Evidence-Based AccreditationEvidence-Based Accreditation

Accredited AccreditedOn AdvisementWarnedProbation

© 2010 AdvancED

Deny or Drop Accreditation

Accreditation Status ProcessAccreditation Status Process

© 2010 AdvancED

QAR Team Provides Evidence via Report

AdvancED Accreditation Commission Determines Accreditation Status and

Grants Term of Accreditation

Next StepsNext Steps

A written report of the findings will be submitted within 30 business days

After receipt of the report, the district is expected to: Review and communicate the findings Address the required actions

o Districts are accountable for acting on these Monitor school and system accreditation standards and

improvement efforts on ongoing basis Submit the Accreditation Progress Report

© 2010 AdvancED

Final ThoughtsFinal Thoughts

On behalf of the Quality Assurance Team, we extend: Our appreciation for your hospitality, support, and

professionalism; Our respect and acknowledgement of your efforts to

improve the quality of your school district; and Our congratulations for your progress toward

achieving District Accreditation as a quality system.

© 2010 AdvancED

We believe in the We believe in the power to transform.power to transform.

© 2010 AdvancED