qualification and elgibility rquirements response … · qualification and elgibility rquirements...

QUALIFICATION AND ELGIBILITY RQUIREMENTS RESPONSE 1) Vanguard Communications Development Company LLC (VCD)

(www.vanguardcommdev.com) is comprised of the four founding members, associate companies in RF Safety, and RF/EMF Testing. Each is a specialist in their individual areas and combined they deliver a very unique perspective toward wireless facilities, the wireless industry as a hole, and the municipalities ability to control wireless growth. With over 100 years of experience we have been evolved with every phase of wireless site development, from the search ring selection to verification of FCC mandated compliance for modification of wireless sites. This very unique group has the ability to bring only what areas of expertise that is necessary to complete the task, without overburdening the client.

2) This composite team have been working in the wireless industry for over 20 years in acquisition management, site development and design, installation ,modification, maintenance contractor, RF Safety Instruction/management ( www.rfcomply.com), and RF/EMF testing( www.emfrf.com ). One of the team members is a lawyer who specializes in Municipalities. He is presently on retainer for some San Diego County municipalities as their legal council.

3) Two members of the team are also executives for BDR Communications, Inc. (www.bdrcommunications.com) out of Carlsbad California. BDR is well known in the wireless industry as a highly respected services contractor, for their high quality workmanship. BDR has a client base that includes Verizon Wireless, AT&T Wireless, Ericsson, and Emerson. They also have AT&T Certified Installation teams for switch room equipment installations, removals, DC Power systems, fiber installations, and QA Inspections.

4) Vanguard has partnered with RSI Safety ( www.rfcomply.com), to insure our clients have the latest compliant training available for Federal and State requirements and we receive the CPUC News Letter electronically on a monthly bases to keep up with the latest rulings and requirements.

5) One if the team members (Robert Ross) is the Vice Chairman for the Telecommunications Review Commission for San Diego County, former chairman of the Telecommunication Committee for Oceanside for over 20 years, and presently a member of the Planning Commission for the city of Oceanside. Mr. Ross was instrumental in the development and implementation of a new telecommunications zoning ordinance that is in place, a special ordinance for Armature Radio operations within the city, supplemental application form for wireless projects and distributed antenna systems(DAS), and right of way standard for telecommunications facilities. His first hand experience in the development of a Telecommunications Master Plan within a municipality, is extremely unique and brings a new dimension to any development process. He is a retired U.S. Marine with over 20 years military communications experience. Some of his notable accomplishments include, the N.A.T.O. Radio Frequency Management and Control School. Graduated in 1980. In 1983 he was stationed at The National Security Agency in Maryland, where he worked on the Development and Management of Computer Generated daily changing

Frequencies and Call signs. Member of the JCS Briefing Team and holder of a Top Secret-Sensitive Compartmental Information Security Clearance.

6) List of clients references, As Vanguard Communications Development we are unable to provide a client listing at this time.

7) Disclosure of any work performed for or on behalf of any wireless carrier, tower firm or any wireless entity within the last five years. Vanguard has not worked for any carriers sense conception.

8) Availability to begin work. The Vanguard team is ready to start this project as soon as possible, or when the City of Calabasas is ready to start the project.

9) Any additional Information 10) This proposal is valid for at least Ninety(90 days after the scheduled RFP due

date of August 12, 2011

ROBERT C. ROSS

Professional Experience: 2010 – Present Founding Partner – Vanguard Communications Development LLC

Specialized in the development of records, property for telecomm sites, and Telecommunications Master Planning for Municipalities.

1998-Present VP of Technical Development – BDR Communications, Inc. Carlsbad, CA

Specialized in the design, Installation, Performance/Acceptance testing of DC power systems. Level –IV-M AT&T Certified Installer, responsible for the development of technical Level certifications for the company under standards Telcordia GR 1275 and AT&T TP76300, RF Safety and OSHA Trainer, and overall company Safety Manager

2011-Present -Panning Commissioner - Oceanside, CA

1989-Present -Cable TV and Telecommunications Review Commission– County of San Diego, CA

1989-2011 Chairman –Telecommunications Committee, Oceanside, CA

1997-1998 Cost Analyst - INDETEC International Del Mar, CA

Worked with such clients as GTE Corporation in the development of, new costing data for potential rate changes in twenty-five states. Developing a database of all Wireless providers in the world, equipment costs by vendors, for use with a new Wireless Costing program.

1993-1997 General Manager - SANDERS ENGINEERING CO., INC. Yorba Linda, CA Managed all projects in San Diego County; responsible for all bids and proposals; full authority for negotiation including all pricing, change orders, subcontractor/vendor selection, and hiring.

1992-1993 Director of Communications - PACIFIC SERVICES, INC. Pasadena, CA

Responsible for field communications; all documentation for bidding and payment; safety at all sights; assisting with arbitration’s; immediate response force during working hours.

1990-1992 Communications Consultant - VITRO CORPORATION Silver Springs, MD

Special consultant for sensitive and high level communications. Instructor for fiber optical fusion splicing, D4 channel bank alignment, satellite communications management, T3 multiplexing, and microwave installations.

1989-1990 Communications Consultant - PACTEL CELLULAR San Diego, CA

Special consultant for site selection, RF evaluation, and equipment installation.

1987-1989 Applications & Sales Engineer - LORAL CORPORATION San Diego, CA

Performed site surveys, path analysis, system design, production/installation management, and final acceptance of new radio equipment for the Federal Government.

1967-1987 Special Communications Chief for FMF Pac, West Coast US MARINE CORPS

Responsible for fixed station communications upgrade and modernization. Specialized in the design and development of SCIF facilities, control towers, switch rooms, and special communications sites. 1983 graduate of the National Security Agency Computer Management of Daily Changing Frequency and Call Sign Systems. 1980 Graduate of NATO Radio Frequency Engineering School

KENNETH H. LOUNSBERY

Mr. Lounsbery attended the College of William and Mary where he earned a degree in Political Science. In 1965, he was awarded a Juris Doctor degree with honors from the California Western University School of Law. Upon admission to the bar Mr. Lounsbery began his career with the San Diego City Attorney's office. Upon promotion to the Civil Division, Mr. Lounsbery specialized in land use, redevelopment and utility regulation matters. Mr. Lounsbery later served as City Attorney in the Cities of Escondido and South Lake Tahoe. In 1976, Mr. Lounsbery was named City Manager of the City of Escondido. During his four year tenure as Manager he concentrated on the formation and direction of the City's redevelopment agency and negotiated the long-term lease of City-owned land for the development by Ernest W. Hahn of the North County Fair regional shopping center. Mr. Lounsbery left his municipal position in 1980 to join Higgs, Fletcher & Mack. As a resident partner in the firm's Escondido office, Mr. Lounsbery represented private clients in the areas of land use, development, construction and redevelopment law. In 1982, the Lusardi Construction Company hired Mr. Lounsbery to become its full time General Counsel; in 1983, he was also named Vice President. His responsibilities included the oversight of all legal aspects of construction matters and the handling of land use entitlements; including environmental approvals, project permitting, financing and completion. These included several industrial developments, one regional shopping center, a large mixed-use project and municipal solid waste facilities. In 1989, Lusardi named Mr. Lounsbery as President of a sister corporation, Servcon, which had the special purpose of obtaining approvals for developing and constructing municipal solid waste disposal facilities. Upon obtaining approvals for two such projects, in 1992 Servcon was sold and Mr. Lounsbery returned to Higgs, Fletcher & Mack. In 1996, Mr. Lounsbery formed the firm of Lounsbery Ferguson Altona & Peak where he served as the contract City Attorney for the City of San Marcos. He now specializes in land use entitlements, environmental law, project financing and municipal law. In 2010, Mr. Lounsbery joined Bruce D. Redmon, Stan Landess and Robert C. Ross in the formation of Vanguard Communications Development LLC for the purpose of managing real estate owned by cities for the purpose of wireless site developmen In the course of his career, Mr. Lounsbery has represented both public and private parties engaged in the provision of public services. He has represented cities for the purpose of negotiating the terms of franchise agreements with regional power utilities, and CATV operators. He has also represented the private interests of CATV operators, refuse collection operators and communication services providers in the process of negotiating franchise agreements with public agencies. As past president of the local Chamber of Commerce and a publicly elected director of the regional hospital district, Mr. Lounsbery has actively served the greater San Diego County community. He currently serves as a charter member of the President's Advisory Council for California State University, San Marcos and is the past President of the San Diego-Imperial County City Attorneys’ Association. Mr. Lounsbery is a member of the U.S. Supreme Court Bar, the State Bar of California and the San Diego County Bar Association.

BRUCE REDMON Vanguard Communications Development Company LLC, Carlsbad, CA Professional Experience: 2010-Present Vanguard Communications Development LLC Carlsbad, CA

Joined Robert Ross, Stan Landess and Kenneth H. Lounsbery in formation of Vanguard Communications Development LLC for the purpose of managing real estate owned by cities for the purpose of wireless site development

1995-Present President JNB Telecom, Inc. Carlsbad, CA

Managed New Site Development Company and Project Managed site development for Cox Communications, Inc in the San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura area for Site Acquisition, A&E, Construction Management.

1974-2010 President – REDMON ELECTRIC Carlsbad, CA (Incorporated 9-15-95 as BDR Communications, Inc.)

1995-Present Oversee operations and company growth. Provide project support and participate in internal processes. Responsible for design development and modifications of Cellular and PCS sites, working closely with Fiber Optical bulk Telephone service providers to provide large quantities of service to Cellular and PCS sites in San Diego, Imperial, and Riverside Counties for the next generation of service(4G). 1985-1995 Designed and installed over 400 cellular sites, which included: Construction, Wiring, DC Power, AC Power, Electronic Equipment, RF Cabling, Antennas and Microwaves both on towers and buildings.

• Provide Site Modifications for Cell Sites and Switch rooms in the San Diego area. • Provide DC Power Modifications and Up Grades. • Provide New Equipment Installations • Designed computer software to provide surveys, engineering and analyze all cell sites for

CDMA deployment in the San Diego area. Engineering included: Analyzing and making recommendations for DC Power, Battery Backup, AC Power, Air Conditioning Requirements, Room Requirements, Structural and Tower Requirements; including for all of the above.

• Provide maintenance on over 1000 cell sites in the San Diego area including all required modifications and changes.

1985-1994 Pac-Tel Cellular Projects Constructed and installed approximately 100 cellular sites including the installation of Electronic Equipment, DC Power Equipment, RF Cabling, Antennas and Microwaves. Complete site Installation and development Contractor for over 100 sites in San Diego and Imperial Counties.

1974-1985 Provided complete electrical installation of all types; including electrical engineering. Electrical Service contractor in San Diego County

Stan Landess 3971 Park Drive, Carlsbad, Ca 92008

(619) 417-0399 Telecommunications Experience: From late 1989 through 1992 Stan Landess was responsible for the acquisition of forty cellular sites for PacTel Cellular, the forerunner of AirTouch Cellular. In 1993, for the Pacific Telesis PCS marketing trial Stan Landess in five months time acquired 29 sites utilizing a temporary license contract. He also acquired 20 CDMA test sites for PacTel Cellular. Under exclusive contract for San Diego County during 1995 through June 1996 with AirTouch Cellular and was solely responsible for acquiring 25 cellular sites. In 1996 through early 1999 as Vice President of Real Estate and Director of Site Acquisitions for JNB Telecom, Inc. Stan Landess managed the Site Acquisition team in the joint venture of JNB Telecom, Inc. with Keith International, Inc. This was a contract with Cox Communications, Inc. for the acquisition, planning, and construction management for Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura and completion of the San Diego project totaling over 120 sites in Southern California. The responsibilities include the implementation, staffing, management, project tracking, and inter-team coordination with leasing administration, planning, survey, geo-technical and hazardous materials consultants, as well as direct site acquisition responsibilities. With JNB Telecom, Inc. in 1999 and into 2000 acquired sites for American Tower, a national tower developer, in a highway corridor project from San Diego to Yuma, Arizona. Real Estate Work Experience 1974-1978 Landess Real Estate: Sole Proprietor. Real Estate brokerage and management.

Primarily investment property 1979-1985 Land Specialists: Partner. Land acquisition and development, responsible for

acquisition and development through final map of projects of over 1,000 apartment units, 100 single family residences, 100,000 square feet of commercial space and 48 condominiums.

1985-1997 Land Associates: Owner. In addition to general brokerage operations, projects include land development, commercial real estate, construction project management, site acquisition and feasibility analysis. Special emphasis on acquisition projects for the telecommunications industry.

1996-2000 JNB Telecom, Inc. See above 2001-2003 Global Building Solutions: The goal of this company was to implement U.S.

modular construction techniques in the development and construction on homes in Baja California. The company was under funded and dissolved.

2004-2006 Rudzinski Realty, broker-agent 2004-5/2009 Travelers Host, Inc.: As President of Travelers Host, Inc. developed, built and

operated a 99 room, 52,000 square foot hotel and restaurant property in Hesperia, California. After one year of operation it was foreclosed on by the lender.

5/2009 – Present Joined R. Erich Schmidt in the formation of Orion Matrix, Inc., a Nevada corporation for the purpose of implementing new technologies for survey initially in the telecommunications development industry.

12/2009 – Present Joined Robert Moses, President of Advance Hybrid Renewable, Inc. for the development of property owned by Mr. Moses’ Pacific Data Properties in the Lancaster area of California. This property is to be developed as an electrical power generating plant with brackish water desalinization.

3/2010 – Present Joined Bruce D. Redmon, Robert C. Ross and Kenneth H. Lounsbery in the formation of Vanguard Communications Development LLC for the purpose of managing real estate owned by cities for the purpose of wireless site development.

Degrees and Licenses 1967 Bachelor of Arts, Mathematics with Marketing Minor, San Diego State University 1974 California Real Estate Broker License 1985 Master of Business Administration, Real Estate Finance and Economics, United

States International University

City of Calabasas Wireless Inspection Protocol

August 2011

Table of Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................. 3 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4

A. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities ............................................................................ 4 B. Overview of the Inspection Process..................................................................................... 4

II. Planning and Scheduling the Renewal Inspection Site Visit ..................................................... 7 A. Role of the Wireless Carrier Inspection Site Visit.............................................................. 7

III. Analyzing Wireless Carriers Performance............................................................................... 8 A. Wireless Carrier Site Inspection Report Structure.............................................................. 8

IV. Responsibilities of Vanguard Communications Development and the City ............................ 8 A. Wireless Facility Inspection Organization and Team Responsibilities ............................... 8 B. City Responsibility............................................................................................................... 9

Appendix A: Proposed Project Schedule ..................................................................................... A Appendix B: Site Inspection Report Form Sample........................................................................B

3

Preface The Wireless Inspection Protocol (Protocol) explains the process by which independent evaluators gather, analyze, and report information regarding the performance and characteristics of existing and future wireless facilities within the city limits of Calabasas California for the purpose of verifying compliance with Federal, State, County, and city rules, regulations, and ordinances.

4

I. Introduction

A. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities “Wireless Telecommunications Facilities” means and includes;

• Telecommunications Tower • Tower • Telecommunications Site • Personal Wireless Facility • Distributive Antenna site (DAS)

A structure, facility, or location designed, or intended to be used as, or used to support, antennas or other transmitting or receiving devices. This includes without limit, towers of all types and kinds and structures that employ stealth technology, including, but not limited to structures such as a multi-story building, church steeple, silo, water tower, sign or other structure such as artificial trees or rocks, that can be used to mitigate the visual impact of an antenna or the functional equivalent of such, including all related facilities such as cabling, guy wires, and associated anchors, equipment shelters and other structures associated with the site. It is a structure and facility intended for transmitting and/or receiving radio, television, cellular, paging, 911, Personal Telecommunications Services, commercial satellite services, microwave services and services not licensed by the FCC, but not expressly exempt from the cities siting, building, and permitting authority.

B. Overview of the Inspection Process The renewal / application process begins with the carrier submission to the city an Application for Renewal of a Wireless Facility (Application for Renewal). After the city has reviewed the Application for Renewal and determined that it is clear and complete, the carrier is notified of the Application for Renewal’s acceptance. The city contracts with an independent organization to conduct a detailed review of the carriers’ sites and records. The inspection organization assigns a team of specialists to conduct an inspection site visit and prepare a report summarizing the team’s findings regarding the carriers performance relative to its wireless site maintenance and the records review. During the site visit, RF data will be plotted utilizing a Narda RF monitor for later evaluation. The findings will be compared with the latest report provided by the carrier. Once all the reports have been completed and agreed upon, a final report will be issued for the individual site to the city.

Sources of Evidence The primary purpose of this Protocol is to describe the process used in conducting the wireless carrier inspection site visit and preparing the inspection report. The inspection report constitutes of existing city records that the carrier has provided per the application for the site usage and the survey records created by the consultant. Additional records may be required in order to create a base line from witch the site survey can be conducted. It may be necessary to request information from the carrier that is operating the particular site, all the information that would be

5

requested is the same information that is sent the FCC when the site is activated. Other sources of evidence include, but need not be limited to:

Federal Communications Commission authorizations: The FCC is the licensing authority for all wireless communications companies. Their rules and regulations guide these companies in all their activities. Compliance with these rules and regulations insures safe operations of equipment. Any inspections must take into account these rules and regulations.

City Planning Documents: Application and approval process for a wireless carrier is thorough and all documents generated by that process are relevant to the existence of the wireless facility. These documents must all be reviewed and salient information extracted for successful completion of a wireless facility inspection and generation of the resulting reports.

City Building Department Documents: The approved plans and specifications of the wireless facility must be used to ascertain that the resulting facility was constructed per the “as built” plans on file with the Building Department. As with the Planning Documents these documents are necessary.

Accountability Plan: Having a baseline documentation from prior inspections will assist in assuring accountability of the wireless carriers in the future. The initial wireless carrier site inspection and its thoroughness will set this baseline.

Annual reports: Annual site inspections confirming compliance with prior reports will create a record of compliance and safety.

Site visit reports: The site visit report will detail compliance with City Planning and Building documentation.

Other documents, data, and information Wireless Carrier Lease: The lease is the contract between the City and the wireless carrier and details the rights of both and needs to be reviewed as part of the process to assure compliance with all authorizations.

Site inspection report: The inspection process will include a complete review of pertinent City records so any previous site inspection reports will be helpful in establishing

Summary of Documentation Review The summary will determine the wireless carrier’s compliance with the rules, regulations and conditions of authorization of all levels of authority taking into account all of the above-listed documents, reports, data, and agencies requirements together with other information as appropriate will be the guiding documentation for the creation of the Site Inspection Report for its use in evaluating compliance with the various authorizations. The summary of review will be presented as a confirmation that all required documentation was available for use by the

6

independent site evaluation team to make their report complete at the time of the individual site visit

Major Components and Sequencing of the Inspection Process Figure 1 depicts the major components and sequencing of the inspection process.

Figure 1. Wireless facility inspection Process

Summary of Review Based upon review and analysis of:

• Existing city record • Site Inspection report

• RF Site Evaluation

Final Site Inspection report to the city

Inspection Site Visit and Report

RF Site Evaluation

Consultants Recommendation

7

II. Planning and Scheduling the Wireless Carrier Inspection Site Visit

A. Role of the Wireless Carrier Inspection Site Visit

The site visit is the event the results of which utilizes all the information gathered in the documentation review to generate the Wireless Carrier Site Inspection Report. This report will document compliance with all authorizations and can be used in many ways from ascertaining that lease renewal options are viable to insuring public safety.

Document Inspection

The process of inspecting the documents detailed in Source of Evidence above will reveal site characteristics necessary to insure efficient use of time for the inspections. Grouping sites for scheduling site visits by common characteristics other than just geographic proximity are very helpful. Rooftop sites may require special authorizations for access and this might present a timing issue that can be dealt with early in the mobilization process instead of later when the time is important.

Preparing the Inspection Site Visit Schedule In the mobilization phase of the wireless carrier inspection process while gathering information from the City documentation site characteristics will be logged into a database to allow evaluation of logical groupings of sites for inspections. Some of the commonalities used might be identification of the wireless carrier, location, type of facility such as a ground site, a rooftop, a “stealth” site (one which has design characteristics to disguise the site or the appearance of the antennas), or access issues. The completion of the mobilization phase will also be the completion of the site visit schedule as well as completion of the requisite database and documentation package needed for each site visit.

Overview of Site Visit Inspection Activities, Responsibilities, and Schedule

All Site Visits will be accomplished by a Principal of Vanguard Communications Development or a licensed professional provided by Vanguard Communications Development and identified in documentation provided by Vanguard Communications Development for the purpose of providing specific services which require a specific level of expertise subject to licensing. The evaluator on each site will be responsible for completing the information required by the Site Inspection Report. The schedule for the inspection process will break up the workflow into segments that will allow inspection and report generation in a logical grouping so that the project flows with completions of reports for

8

review, discussion and City acceptance throughout the project instead of at the completion of the project. When all the sites have been inspected and all reports submitted there will be a demobilization period for project wrap up which will include meetings for project review and evaluation of results and performance of Vanguard Communication Development in accomplishing the project goals.

III. Analyzing Wireless Carrier Performance

A. Wireless Carrier Site Inspection Report Structure

The Wireless Carrier Site Inspection Report will be a report with several components. The results of the mobilization process will generate a wireless facility database as input into a Site Inspection Report format. The mobilization process will identify each document used in the preparation of the database and Site Inspection Report format. These documents will be referenced by name and date of generation and approval, if any. These documents will be a part of the “Report” by reference. The main body of the report will be the Site Inspection Report completed on site at the time of the inspection with all comments made at that time by the evaluator. These reports will be in hard copy and digital form.

IV. Responsibilities of Vanguard Communications Development and the City This section briefly summarizes the significant responsibilities of the evaluation team and the contracting City. This summary is not intended to be comprehensive; the specific tasks undertaken by each participant will vary depending upon the authorizations, size, past history and performance, and unique characteristics of each wireless facility

A. Wireless Facility Inspection Organization and Team Responsibilities Prior to the inspection site visit, the inspection organization has the following responsibilities:

• Assemble a team of individuals whose professional backgrounds and expertise are relevant to the Request for Proposals’ purpose, work scope, qualification requirements, and the City’s Profession Services Agreement.

• Ensure that the number of team members is sufficient to perform a comprehensive review of the school, as required by this Protocol.

• Designate a team leader who will serve as the team’s point of contact with the City, coordinate the work of team members, and, if appropriate, lead the team’s work in preparing the inspection reports.

• Endeavor to accommodate reasonable requests from the City for minor changes to document production, plans or schedules.

• Ensure that all team members have familiarized themselves with this Protocol.

9

A. Meet the scheduled deadlines for submitting the reports to the City.

B. City Responsibility

Before the inspection site visits and during the mobilization phase, the City has the following responsibilities:

• Participate in meeting with Vanguard Communications Development. The inspection team, will be allowed to discuss any issues subject to this Protocol and Request for Proposals and the Professional Services Agreement.

• Provide the inspection team leader with the documents required by this Protocol, in electronic form (e.g., in email attachments or on a CD) when feasible, by the required date.

• As needed, work with the inspection team leader to develop the site visit schedule and inform if necessary the wireless carriers of the schedule and the team’s access requirements.

• Designate a first and second City contact person who will be available to respond to team inquiries and requests.

• Provide the team with comfortable, private, and secure working space.

• Provide Access to the sites.

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Resource Names

1 Vanguard Communications Development LLC 75 days Mon 9/5/11 Fri 12/16/112 Project Mobilization 2 days Mon 9/5/11 Tue 9/6/113 Kisk off meeting for the Project 2 days Mon 9/5/11 Tue 9/6/11

4 City of Calabasas record review and verification 65 days Mon 9/19/11 Fri 12/16/115 Formulate preliminary site survey list 2 days Wed 9/21/11 Thu 9/22/11

6 Midigate any Access sisues 10 days Mon 9/19/11 Fri 9/30/11

7 Determine final survay list 5 days Mon 9/26/11 Fri 9/30/11

8 Site Inspections 48 days Mon 10/3/11 Wed 12/7/119 Sites Surveys for sites 1 thru 6 3 days Mon 10/3/11 Wed 10/5/11 7

10 Sites Surveys for sites 7 thru 12 3 days Mon 10/10/11 Wed 10/12/11









19 Project Demobilization 5 days Mon 12/12/11 Fri 12/16/1120 Final Site Packages are excepted by the city 5 days Mon 12/12/11 Fri 12/16/1121 Any Site packages in question are finalized 3 days Mon 12/12/11 Wed 12/14/11 18

22 Preliminary Final Documentation Review 2 days Mon 12/12/11 Tue 12/13/11

23 Final Documentation Ready for Signatures 3 days Wed 12/14/11 Fri 12/16/11 22

VANGUARD COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT LLCCity of Calabasas Wireless Site Evaluation

Page 1

VCD Std FORM FILE / LEASE REVIEW Rev 1.0 10.29.10

File Review / Lease & Land Use Analysis Form

Date:Site Name:Address:

City: State:County: Zip Code:APN:

Landlord / Lease Information Ground Landlord Name:Ground Landlord MLA:Structure Landlord Name:Structure Landlord MLA:

Ground Landlord Noticing Address:

Lease Expiration dates Ground Structure

Antenna Structure InformationStructure Type Year Built

Overall Structure Height per As Builts or other company files

Proposed Scope(s) of Work

Directions to Site

Facility Access Procedures (include combination locks, time restrictions, etc.)

Are there construction of maintenance window time restrictions? If yes, please describe.

Number of carriers on the tower

Page 1 of 4


Antenna & Coax File Review

AntennasLease Exhibit

Structural Review Zoning

Currently Installed

Number of SectorsAntenna TypeAntenna Size (if Omni)Other (please describe)

Size Quantity Rad CenterMicrowave DishGPS Antenna

Per SectorLease Exhibit


Currently Installed

Sector RAD Center (feet)Panel Antenna SizeOther SizeNumber of AntennasOther

Coax

Per SectorLease Exhibit


Currently Installed

Coax SizeCoax Number

Lease Entitlements

Antenna / Dish Comments - please include detailed descriptions of restrictions for sectors with unequal characteristics

Lease Entitlements

Lease Entitlements

Coax Comments - please include detailed descriptions of restrictions for sectors with unequal characteristics

If Coax Size/Number is other, please describe

Page 2 of 4


EnclosureLease Exhibit


Currently Installed

Equipment Enclosure typeIf Equipment Enclosure is other, please describe

Leased Space Length Width Sq. FeetDimensionsEquipment Enclosure Right to place a generator

Zoning Information

Jurisdiction NameJurisdiction TypeJurisdiction if Other

Jurisdiction if Other

Original Permit Expiration Date if applicable

Zoning/Permitting Process for proposed SOW

Structure Type on ZD's

If other

Regulatory InformationIs a clean NEPA on file?If no, was an EA filed?Give Reason(s), if Yes

If yes, please indicate area(s) of concern

Will the SOW changes require any of the following…New CPUCSHPOTCNS

If a final NEPA determination was not found in file or known for certain to have been performed, with no adverse effects noted, please answer the followingAre there any known potential NEPA concerns for this site location?

Answer questions below based on a review of the site files and/or information obtained from jurisdiction

Jurisdiction Type #2 if applicable

Lease Entitlements

Silent

Original Company Permit Process

Estimated Duration of zoning and/or permitting process

Page 3 of 4


SUMMARY

Please mark with an "X" what would be required for the following additions:

Leasing Add Antenna

Change Antenna

SizeAdd Coax

Add (1) Outside Cabinet


Trenching for fiber (if

applicable)By RightLandlord NoticeLandlord Notice & ConsentLandlord ApplicationExhibit UpdateLease AmendmentNew / Amended EasementsStructural Review

Zoning Add Antenna

Change Antenna

SizeAdd Coax




applicable)By RightAdministrative ApprovalLandlord NoticeConditional / SUPLegal ReviewMinor CUPMajor CUPVarianceUnknown

Implementation / Construction

Add Antenna

Change Antenna

SizeAdd Coax




applicable)No Permit RequiredElectrical PermitBuilding Permit

Auditor - Enter the name and contact information of the individual completing this form.Prime Contractor firm nameName of Auditor's firmAuditor's Name Phone #Auditor's E-mail Address

Based on leasing, zoning and permitting analysis, describe in detail the process and duration needed for this/these specific jurisdiction(s) to install additional equipment and appurtenances as necessary

Additional Comments

Additional Comments

Additional Comments

Page 4 of 4

VCD std FORM SITE AUDIT Rev 1.0 10-29-10

Physical Site Audit

Date of Assessment 10/5/2011

Site Name

Address

City

State Zip 0

County

LANDLORD INFORMATION

Ground Landlord Name 0Structure Landlord Name 0

NoIf No (explain)

YesIf No (explain)

YesIf No (explain)

YesIf No (explain)

NoIf No (explain)

SITE INFORMATION

Site Directions

Facility Access Procedures

Special Delivery, Storage, and Installation Considerations (e.g. crane required)

Antenna Structure Type Monopine(select one from drop down menu)

2 antenna's and 2 cables per sector not on the CUP

General Site Maintenance

CA

LA

Zoning Review Needed

Record indicat 3 antennas per sector, there are 4 per sector

RF Safety Singns, Barriers, Site Safety Issues

General Public Sign not the right size

Antenna/Cable

23801 Washington Ave. Ste.H108

Bear View

Calabasas

Site compound is located in the N west corner of the shopping center, by the Bank of America

Gate pad lock is combo = 2126

ARE THE RECORDS UP TO DATE FOR THIS SITE

Records do not match site conditions

Page 1 of 8


ANTENNAS Space Assessment SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3 SECTOR 4

2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0

4 4 4 4

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Panel Panel Panel Panel

No No No NoPipe Pipe Pipe Pipe

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Paint with sock Paint with sock Paint with sock Paint with sock

26' 26' 26' 26'

1 2 3 4Microwave Antennas on Tower? NoEst. microwave RAD Center (ft) n/aDish Diameter (ft) n/aGPS Antenna mounted on Tower? No If "No", please describe GPS Antenna location On CMO'sEst. GPS RAD Center (ft) 7'

ALPHA UPPER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

DBXLH-6565A-VTM LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

N/A N/A "E" Pipe Mount Only

N/A N/A N/A

ALPHA LOWER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

N/A 0 LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

N/A N/A N/A N/A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

BETA UPPER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



N/A N/A N/A

BETA LOWER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

N/A N/A LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

N/A N/A N/A N/A



If the Antennas are Painted or Concealed, Please Describe (site acq-zoning-build. Dept)

Est. Antenna RAD Center (ft) per CDs or database

Number of existing antennas at RAD center LOWER ARRAY (if exist)

Estimate Size of existing antennas at RAD center

Describe type of existing antennas: Panel/Omni/Other

Mount Type

SECTOR ANTENNA POSITION (from behind the antenna's, from left to right)

Is AM Detuning Present? (select Yes, No, or NA for each sector)

Mount Type Comments

Number of existing antennas at RAD center

Estimate Size of existing antennas at RAD center LOWER ARRAY (if exist)

Page 2 of 8


GAMMA UPPER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



N/A N/A N/A

GAMMA LOWER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

N/A N/A LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

LTE-BXA-70063/4CF

N/A N/A N/A N/A



DELTA UPPER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

DELTA LOWER EXISTING1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0

Page 3 of 8


COAX SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3 SECTOR 4

Manufacturer Andrew Andrew Andrew NA

Number of runs 4 4 4 NA

Diameter 7/8 in 7/8 in 7/8 in NAModel Number(s) LDF5-50A LDF5-50A LDF5-50A NA

55' 55' 55' NA

No - 0 No - 0 No - 0 NA

SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2

If multiple Coax diameters, tower port limitations, or other abnormality exists, please explain (e.g. underground , or special circumstances).

SECTOR 3 SECTOR 4

SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2

If the Coax is Painted or Concealed, Please Describe

SECTOR 3 SECTOR 4

COAX ENTRY PORTS

Roof Used cable entry holes (Select One) N/A

Roof Unused cable entry holes (Select One)

Height Width

Dimensions in inches

Diameter(s) of coax entry holes (in inches)

If other diameter, then explain and include diameter

Inside Used cable entry holes

Inside Unused cable entry holes

Height Width

Dimensions in inches

Diameter(s) of coax entry holes (in inches)If other diameter, then explain and include diameter

Termination in Shelter/Cabinet N-F

Additional entry port locations available?

If so, where are they located in shelter?

Please describe any existing analog coax (connected or not) (size, quantity, etc.)

COAX NOTES:Sector Permitted ExistingAlpha 4 6

Beta 4 6

Gamma 4 6

Delta 0 0

Spares 0 0

Totals 12 18

Grd Cable Tray will handle new cables

N/A

Paint to Match with Tree Socks

none

N/A

n/a

site acq/building dept/ LL notification-(refer to notes)

N/A

Est coax length per Sector. Note multiple lengths per Sector

site acq/building dept/ LL notification-(refer to notes)

Paint to Match with Tree Socks

Paint to Match with Tree Socks n/a

Page 4 of 8


Cabling Notes: New cables, verify when they were installed, check for new permit

Page 5 of 8


Generator ReceptacleType -

Location at Site, please describe Inside compound

Power Company SC Edison

Meter ID

Identify method of power delivery if not metered by Power Company

PERMANENT GENERATOR

Is Permanent Generator Present? No

Is Company connected to the permanent generator? No

Manufacturer n/a

Power rating, in KW n/a Model Number -

Is there room for a perm generator (10'x12' pad) no Fuel Type -

Is there lease space or public access space for a temp generator (10'x17')? No

OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT:Type of Equipment

Cabinet Foundation Type Roof Top

Length Width

Foundation/Pad/Platform Dimensions (inches) 190" 59"

yes/no Length WidthEquipment Pad Extension Required (site acq/bldg dept) No

yes/no Length Width Depth

Existing Telco / Fiber cabinetYes

36" 30"9"

pictures required

yes/noRoom for additional Telco / Fiber Cabinet(s) 48"x48"x12" Yes If yes how many 2 If no explain

Space for new LTE cabinet NoFor outdoor cabinets, the total outside dimensions of cabinets and appurtenances located on the pad

For outdoors sites, describe any adjacent area available for possible expansion (inside or outside compound)

Nortel-CMO-PCS

Ground Pad

35" X 178"

Height above Grade4"

NA

n/a

Lug box

To the east or south of the existing compound

Re-configure cabinets

Page 6 of 8


INDOOR EQUIPMENT

Length Width Height

Estimate Available Space Inside For LTE N/A

Describe Where

Site Type

Shelter/Cabinet Manufacturer Serial # n/a

Evidence of water leakage in shelter? If "Yes", then identify where.

notes:site acq/building dept/ LL notification-(refer to notes)

Describe Existing Analog Equiopment

RF Racks

Total number of RF Racks and/or cabinets 3

Is floor space available for additional 22” Rack? Yes If no, could shelter be reconfigured to support a 22" rack?

If answer is “Yes” how many additional racks can be added? 2

Using the floor plan sketch provided to you, please verify the number and approximate location of existing racks / cabinets within our space. Mark "OK" if accurate, or make redline corrections (no dimensions needed) if inaccurate. Please date the drawing .

GENERAL SITE MAINTENANCE

Does site comform to approved plans Yes

Is the site clean Yes

Is there any Grafffiti No

Any Landscaping issues No

Any Stealthing Issues No

Notes:

none

n/a

Notes:

Page 7 of 8


HVAC N/A

Exhaust Fan No Fan

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6

Manufacturer

Type

Model Number

Capacity in tons (12,000 BTU/hr = 1 ton)

BACKHAULList Circuit IDs and On/Off status Circuit IDs Active? Circuit IDs Active?

See photos

Info for Customer interface device or demarcation point (NIU) or Microwave interface

Manufacturer

Model Number

Location

Comments

SITE Telco Board Dimensions (in inches) N/A

SITE Telco Board available space (see photo) No

Is conduit into room/shelter available? Yes

Size 2 in or less

Pull String Available? No

Does fiber run to the site? No

If a field meet with a fiber provider is part of the SOW, please provide a Fiber Feasibility report per the Transport dept specs.

Auditor - Enter the name and contact information of the individual completing this form.(Entries are copied from the File Review tab. Please override if incorrect)

Prime Contractor firm name Vanguard Communications Development

Name of Auditor's firm Vanguard Communications Development

Auditor's Name Bob Ross Phone # 619-318-7583

Auditor's E-mail Address [email protected]

Notes:

Auditor Notes:

Kentrox

Satellite 931 T-1 CSU's

Inside shelter/cabinet

Page 8 of 8

VCD std FORM PHOTOS Rev. 1.0 10-29-10

Description of Required Photographs Please mark all photographs taken with an "X".Abbreviations in parenthesis are descriptors for naming the photos

Naming example: SITENAME. DESCRIPTOR.date.jpg e.g. Point Loma.SVO.101208.jpg

Site View of Outside the Fence or rooftop (SVO) 1 Clear view of the cell site with Tower

2 Full View of the Shelter/Cabinet and its Entrance

Company Generator (GEN)3 View of the Company Generator (if accessible) or its Housing

Structure (STR)4 View of antenna support structure

5 View of complete structure

Antenna Arrays (ANT)6 View of alpha sector

7 View of beta sector

8 View of gamma sector

Enclosure/Shelter (ENC)

9 View of Equipment Cabinets / Enclosure

Panoramic view of lease area 10 View of all components in the Lease area

Coax / Cable Entry Ports11 View of coax cables entering and exiting the equipment space and/or antenna structure

12 View of coax cables entering and exiting any other constricted space (doghouse, chase, conduit, etc.)

Stealth

13 Any Photos relating the Stealthing of this site

Equipment Frames/Racks (EF)14 One Picture showing all Equipment Frames/Racks Looking in the Shelter/cabinet

Miscellaneous15 Any other photographs pertinent to the site

Miscellaneous

16

COST PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF CALABASAS

Request for Proposal (RFP)

For

Facility Compliance Testing Services for Wireless Communications

This Cost proposal is broken down into two (2) primary areas;

• Administration------------------------------------------- $26,713.00

o Mobilization o De-Mobilization

• Site Surveys---------------------------------------------- $59,255.00

o Per site Fee based on Sixty (60) sites-----$1,432.00

TOTAL SERVICE COST----$85,938.00 Hourly Rates

• On Site Personnel-----------$125.00 + $47.00 Expenses • RME-------------------------$138.00 + $47.00 Expenses