public & private health care in canada before the canadian pension & benefits institute...

18
PUBLIC PUBLIC & & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA IN CANADA before the Canadian Pension & Benefits Institute Winnipeg - June 15, 2007 by Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D. Economist, Montreal Economic Institute

Upload: howard-noah-carter

Post on 22-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PUBLIC PUBLIC && PRIVATE HEALTH PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADACARE IN CANADA

before theCanadian Pension & Benefits Institute

Winnipeg - June 15, 2007

by Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D.Economist, Montreal Economic Institute

Possible private contribution

• Possible private contribution in the health care sector:– Out-of-pocket financing – Private insurance – Private provision of publicly funded services– PPP

• I will focus more specifically on the role of private insurance

• Canada is the only OECD country that prohibits the possibility of private insurance for medically required services (through provincial legislation).

• Canada is also one of the « biggest spenders » on health care

• What are the results? Value for our money?

Context

• Health care spending accounts for more than 10% of our GDP (70% public, 30% private)

• With inflation taken into account, per capita public health care spending doubled in 30 years (CIHI).

Financial sustainability

• More than 33% of total provincial government revenues are spent on health care

• In Quebec: 44% of provincial program spending goes toward health care in 2006 compared to 35% in 1990.

Financial sustainability

Factors driving growth:– Population aging (the share of the elderly

in the population 14% today, 23% in 2026)

– Technology– New drugs

Growth Projections for Canada: Increase of 4% of GDP by 2040, (CD Howe), 4,2% in 2050, (OECD)

Financial sustainability

5,5

5,9

6,5

7,2

7,4

7,5

7,7

7,9

7,9

8,0

8,0

8,2

8,3

8,7

8,9

9,1

9,2

9,3

9,6

9,8

9,9

10,1

10,1

10,4

10,5

10,5

10,911,5

0,0 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0 14,0

Korea

Slovakia

Poland

Ireland

Finland

Czech Republic

Luxembourg

Spain

United Kingdom

New Zealand

Japan

Italy

Hungary

OECD average

Denmark

Netherlands

Asutralia

Sweden

Austria

Portugal

Canada

Norway

Belgium

France

Iceland

Greece

Germany

Switzerland

Health care spending in OECD countries with universal access as %/GDP (2003, 8th)

Cost

Different measures of health care system performance; two are of particular relevance for Canada:

– Access

– Waiting time

Cost and results

1,4

1,7

2,1

2,3

2,3

2,5

2,6

2,8

2,8

2,9

2,9

2,9

3,0

3,0

3,1

3,1

3,2

3,2

3,3

3,4

3,5

3,6

3,6

3,7

3,7

3,7

4,2

4,3

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0

TurkeyJapan (2002)

United KingdomCanadaFinland

South KoreaNew ZealandLuxembourg

PolandAustraliaGermany

SpainDenmarkSweden

HungaryPortugal

FranceIrelandAustriaNorway

SwitzerlandBelgium

ItalyCzech republic

NetherlandsSlovakia

GreeceIceland

Number of doctors per 1000 inhabitants (24th)

Cost and results

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1993 1999 2005

co

nsta

nt

2005 d

ollars

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

19

weeks

Public spending per capita and waiting times in Canada1993-2005

Source: Fraser Institute; Canadian Institute for Health Information

Cost and results

• Private health insurance plays varying roles in OECD countries and fulfills different functions within health care systems.

• Five categories of insurance, from the most comprehensive to those complement to the public system.

Private health insurance

• Among the five categories of insurance, only one, supplementary insurance, is already established in Canada for uninsured services.

• Three of the other four are unlikely to be offered, even following the Chaoulli ruling, because of the legal obstacles that remain.

Private health insurance

Private insurance: new opportunities

Duplicate insurance

• Individuals remain insured with the public system while paying for the option of being treated in a parallel private system, with no commitment of public funds to cover this care

• Exists notably in Finland, Italy, U.-K., Australia, Ireland

• For greater overall financing.

• For more capacity to treat patients (more beds, more equipment, more operating rooms, etc.)

• To create more work in the private sector for existing medical staff, underused in the public system because of salary caps and quotas.

Private insurance: new opportunities

Private insurance: new opportunities

• To repatriate thousands of doctors and nurses working abroad.

• Without private insurance, only the wealthiest Canadians could obtain private treatment, often outside Canada, paying directly from their pockets

• User fees (exist in 78% of OECD countries).

(Need to change the Canada Health Act eventually)

• Private provision of publicly funded services (Sweden, France, U.-K.)

Other possible private contribution

Public opinion

52%

42%

6%

65%

33%

1%

YES NO DON'T KNOW

CANADA QUEBEC

Question: Would you find it acceptable or not if the government were to allow those who wish to pay for healthcare in the private sector to have speedier access to this type of care while still maintaining the current free and universal healthcare system?

Conclusion

• It’s not part of Canadian values to let people suffer on waiting lists.

• The private sector does not threaten the public sector as OECD countries experience shows.