-- --. .. ——. ....... .... INI ••III ••III Hill

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN010

PROSPECTING TRAVERSE

NAGAGAMI RIVER

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION, ONTARIO

NTS: 4EF/10 and 42F/15

49031'3O" N lat784047'3O" W long

to

4904G'aD" N lat784032'1O" W long

by

Robert M. Kuehnbaum31O1 O'Hagan Drive

Mississauga, OntarioL5C 2C4

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

010C

INTRODUCTION 1

LOGISTICS 1

PHYSIOGRAPHY AND QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS 3

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK 3

GEOLOGY 4

STREAM SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY G

DISCUSSION G

REFERENCES 7

APPENDIX I, ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES, STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLES . . B

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Part of 1:1,000,000 scale Bedrock Geology, showing location of Nagagami River traverse, and locations of nearby towns 2

2. Frost Township, Geology and Stream Sediment Samples packet scale 1 inch = \ mile

3. Cross Township, Geology and Stream Sediment Samples pocket scale 1 inch ;^ \ mile

4. Arnott Township, Geology and Stream Sediment Samples pocket scale 1 inch = \ mile

5. McMillan Township, Geology and Stream Sediment Samples pocket scale 1 inch - \ mile

PROSPECTING TRAVERSENAGAGAMI RIVER

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISIONONTARIO

NTS: 42F/1O and 42F/15

INTRODUCTION:

This report summarizes the results of a reconnaissance prospecting traverse of a section of highly metamorphosed Archean rocks along the Nagagami River in northwestern Ontario. The study was part of the author's 1992 O.P.A.P. grant, and was carried out between August 17 and 20, 1992.

The 45-kilometer interval of the Nagagami River which was examined lies south of Highway 11, and west of Highway 631. The Nagagami River crosses Highway 11 about E1 km west of Hearst; the town of Hornpayne, located on the Canadian National Railways line, is situated about 73 km south of the junction of Highway 11 and Highway 631. Locations are given on Figure 1.

The objective of the program was to test for the possibility of greenstone assemblages and sulphide mineralization similar to that at the "McGale Prospect" on the Nagagami River north of Highway 11.

LOGISTICS:

The Nagagami River flows generally northward from Nagagami Lake,northwest of Hornpayne, to its confluence with the Kenogami River which in turn flows into the Albany River. South of Highway 11, there are three possible access points along the river: at Nagagami Lake and Melody Lake which are accessible by float aircraft, and; Couchiching Rapids which is accessible by vehicle via a new road from the Hornpayne area. According to personnel at Forde Lake Air Services, who operate a fishing camp on Nagagami Lake, and who occasionally run canoe excursions into the upper part of the river, the terrane above Melody Lake is very low-lying, and the river current sluggish. Since it was apparent that there was little likelihood of good bedrock exposure there, it was decided to fly into Melody Lake (from Forde Lake] which is the northernmost access point south of Highway 11.

Below Melody Lake, there are six portages varying in length from 50 m to 1,700 m, representing a total of 4,950 m. The portage trails are narrow but not difficult; a lack of maintenance in the last two years, however, has resulted in occasional deadfall and windfall zones across the trails.

Most sections of the Nagagami River are meandering, deep (about 3 m) and slow-flowing, but there are occasional intervals (see below) with shallow riffles and pocketwater with increased current where passage is somewhat hazardous. It is suspected that, in a normal summer, water levels would be sufficiently low for spotting channels and lining a canoe by wading; in the unusually high-water conditions (at least 0.6 m above normal) of 1992, however, the riffle water was very difficult to wade, and submerged (normally exposed) boulders presented hidden hazards. Nonetheless, the river is quite passable if sufficient care is taken. No attempt should be made to shoot or line any sections of the river

,—-^ -vi l /' /"- XRCER CFKX-J ARNOTT 5TOBEY NASSAU ; ,1ISH fjf WAY

S f . / X i .vft : i

(\J

Figure 1. Part of 1:1,000,000 scale Bedrock Geology, Geology of Ontario Series, showing location of Nagagami River traverse, and locations of nearby towns. Unit 7a is paragneiss and migmatite; unit 13 is muscovite- bearing granitic rocks.

where portages bypass rapids.

The author was assisted by Donald R. Hawke of Mississauga, Ontario.

PHYSIOGRAPHY AND QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS:

The terrane of the upper (southern] half of the area traversed - from Melody Lake to Dirty Bush Rapids - is largely very flat, and rises very little (less than 1 m to 2 m] above the Nagagami River. Forest cover is predominantly black spruce, with occasional poplar on higher ground (eskers?]. The banks of the river consist of clay and silt, with minor gravelly layers. Outcrop is scarce. Minor drainages are swampy, and have no noticeacle water flow; the mouths of many of them are blocked by beaver dams. The elevation drop from Melody Lake to the top of White Owl Rapids is in the order of 15-18 m over approximately 20 km; much of this drop is at Trout Rapids and Gull Rock Rapids. The river in this upper section is deep and relatively sluggish, flowing at a steady rate of about 1 km/hour; there are no riffle intervals, the only fast water being at the rapids. Outcrop is also scarce (Figs. 2 and 3].

Below White Owl Rapids, the character of the river is dramatically different. Although there is outcrop at Dirty Bush Rapids (Fig. 3), the rapids flow primarily over a base of boulders. Rough Rock Rapids and Jackpine Rapids ('the Canyon') similarly consist of boulders with intermittent bedrock exposure. Between Dirty Bush Rapids and Rough Rock Rapids, the river alternates between sections of steady current with occasional large boulders, and riffle/pocketwater sections - some up to \ km in length - over a bed of boulders. The banks of the river consist of gravelly silt-sand-clay. Between Dirty Bush Rapids and Rough Rock Rapids, the river drops about 20 m. The total descent of the river through Rough Rock Rapids and Jackpine Rapids is about 20-25 m over 2 km. The final interval traversed, between Jackpine Rapids and Hwy 11, is similar to that above Rough Rock Rapids, although riffles are relatively minor; the river descends about 5-7 m along 8 km in this section.

The observations of riverbank Quaternary sediments in this study corresponds to the distribution of glacial and glaciolacustrine deposits shown by Prest and others, 1968. According to them, the lower part of the river traverses ground morain of the Wisonsin (last] glacial episode. The upper part of the river crosses a narrow belt of glacial lake deposits, although east of the river are outwash and end morain deposits. In addition to typical granitoid material in the till, occasional cobbles of limestone from Paleozoic strata in the Hudson Bay Lowlands were also observed in this study, indicating glacial transport generally from the north. The limit of post-Wisconsin marine overlapis shown by Prest and others (1968) to be about 10-15 km north of Hwy 11, and no evidence of marine sediments were found during the present survey.

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK

There are no mineral claims in the area of the present study, and there is no recorded mineral exploration work in any of the townships from Nagagami Lake to Hwy 11. The author is aware that, in the mid-1970s, Shell Minerals conducted helicopter-mounted, regional reconnaissance investigations, including geochemical surveys and geological mapping, in the region, including

- 4 -

the area around the Three Portages Rapids (McGale) sulphide prospect. The area of present interest may have been at least partially covered, but results are unknown.

A moderate amount of work has been done north of Hwy 11 in Auden and Fintry Townships, north of the area of interest. The "McGale prospect" on the Nagagami River, about 20 km north of Hwy 11, in the northeast corner of Auden Township, consists of a 3.5 to 7.5 m wide sulphide band composed of pyrite and pyrrhotite (about 20?0 with local chalcopyrite. As early as 1965-1366, Colleen Copper carried out geophysical surveys over the zone, and drilled four holes (Toronto Assessment Report #63.1884). In 1971, North D'Arcy Exploration Ltd., following a magnetic survey, drilled G holes totalling 1,511 ft (460.7 m}. The holes intersected greenstone, locally conglomeratic quartzite, and pegmatite. One hole is reported to have cut 47 ft (14.3 m) of massive pyrite and pyrrhotite with minor chalcopyrite and bornite. Another hole cut 24.5 ft (7.5 m] containing +50% sulphides (pyrrhotite) (Toronto Assessment Reports #10, 2.299). In 1985, Noranda Exploration covered an area to the east with MaxMin and magnetic surveys, and found six conductors on strike with the McGale prospect (Assessment Report#2.7779); there is no resord of drilling.

A G.S.C. aeromagnetic anomaly to the southwest, in the southwest part of Fintry Township, was followed up by ground magnetic and electromagnetic surveys in 1967 by Birch Point Mines. Anomalies were outlined (Assessment Report#63.2228), but there is no record of drilling. In 1974, the anomaly was covered with an airborne electromagnetic survey by Scintrex 5urveys Limited for Cedam Limited. The anomaly was discounted as being due to mafic intrusive rocks (Assessment Report #2.1409).

In 1988, a block of 100 claims owned by McKinnon Prospecting Syndicate in the Three Portages Rapids area was covered by an airborne geophysical survey (Ferderber Geophysics, Assessment Report #2.11207). The block has subsequently been expanded. In 1991, an airborne geophysical survey was flown by Aerodat for the McKinnon Prospecting Syndicate; the survey covered about 80 km of strike length, including the northern parts of Fintry and Auden Townships. The target is reported to be gold mineralization related to possible structures and iron formation (Assessment Report #2.1424). In the winter of 1991-1992, ground surveys were carried out by the syndicate.

GEOLOGY:

The only published geological map of the area of interest is a compilation (in part of unpublished data) by the Ontario Department of Mines (Innes, 1969) at a scale of 1 inch to 2 miles (1:126,720). Outcrop in the area is very sparse, and much of the geology - in particular mafic rocks - has been interpreted on the basis of G.S.C. aeromagnetic evidence. Between Melody Lake and Hwy 11, Innes (1969) shows lithologies at only five locations at rapids or riffles, where outcrops may have been examined by helicopter reconnaissance of the river. The rock types are: undifferentiated metasedimentary and metavolcanic migmatites of Archean age at Trout Rapids, Dirty Bush Rapids, Rough Rock Rapids, and at the Hwy 11 bridge, and; granitic rocks in an east-west riffle section between Dirty Bush Rapids and Rough Rock Rapids. Undifferentiated migmatites predominate in the general region south of Hwy 11. Interpreted northeast trending diabase dykes of Protero zoic age are readily apparent on aeromagnetic maps. Other aeromagnetic anomalies

trend east-west, and it was felt that these subtle anomalies could represent mafic metavolcanic rocks, iron formation or sulphide mineralization in the otherwise monotonous sequence of gneissic strata.

In this river traverse, the primary objective was to identify the presence or absence of such greenstone belt remnants and/or mineralization. Mapping in detail the gneissic rocks and granitoid intrusions was therefore of secondary importance. Nonetheless, because this area had never been syste matically mapped Cto the author's knowledge), most river exposures were examined. Exceptions are the central parts of Rough Rock Rapids and Jackpine Rapids where access is difficult. A few exposures of gneissic rocks could only be generally classified since they occur in riffle sections of the river where stopping was either hazardous or impassible. Observations of the geology are given on the accompanying \ mile to 1 inch (1:31,680) scale claim sheets [Figs 2 to 5).

The Archean layered and intrusive rocks comprise a migmatitic complex over the entire area of this study. Rocks of probably metasedimentary origin are represented by medium-grained, poorly compositionally banded biotite-quartz- feldspar (mostly plagioclase) paragneiss; the only other constituent minerals found are almandine garnet and cordierite at Dirty Bush Rapids. Where mobilizate or injection phases are minor, the rock is classified as a schist (unit pgne ). More commonly, however, veins of pegmatite and/or quartz monzonite and granodiorite are present in significant quantities (up to 40-50%), and the rock is classified as a migmatite (unit pgn ). The veins are usually narrow (10-20 cm), discordant to concordant to the foliation, and anastomosing. Schistosity is undulating, and trends from 090 to 130 ; dips are mostly moderately to steeply north. Coarse-grained, massive amphibolite (unit amph) occurs only at Island Rapids, as a small pod within typical migmatite; it contains traces of disseminated pyrrhotite, and may represent a remnant of a mafic intrusive or volcanic phase.

In a few outcrops, intrusive rocks predominate. They include: white to grey, massive to foliated, medium-grained hornblende-granodiorite (unit gd); pinkish, medium-grained massive to foliated biotite-quartz monzonite (qmz ) and hornblende-quartz monzonite (qmz ), and; biotite-diorite (di). The pink, massive pegmatite locally contains coarse muscovite, and appears to post date all other intrusive phases. The granodiorite and quartz monzonite in large outcrops are essentially identical to those lithologies in the migmatitic zones. The ubiquitous pegmatite is probably a partial melting (mobilizate) phase post dating formation of the migmatite complex.

Massive Proterozoic diabase (db) dykes occur at Trout Rapids, 1.5 km of Island Rapids, Island Rapids, and at the head of Jackpine Rapids. They vary from 20 cm to 5 m in width, and trend at 030 , 055 , and 155 ; all are vertical. The northeast trending dykes appear to follow a late fracture pattern observed in a few localities (e.g. Dirty Bush Rapids), while others fit the regional northwest trend. Interestingly, Innes (1969) interpreted a northwest trending dyke in the vicinity of Rough Rock and Jackpine Rapids, although the magnetic anomaly cannot be due to the 20 cm dyke observed there.

A 5-km long, east-west, positive aeromagnetic anomaly just west of Trout Rapids led Innes (1969) to postulate an east-west diabase dyke. Diabase was found at Trout Rapids, but the dyke trends at 030 , and the anomaly is therefore unexplained. No explanation could be found for a weakly negative east-west anomaly just east of Dirty Bush Rapids, nor a weakly positive anomaly about 3 km south of Dirty Bush Rapids, and 1-2 km west of the Nagagami River. It is intersting,

- B -

however, that there is no ground evidence for east-west diabase dykes; pyrrhotite- bearing mafic rocks (amphibolites) such as those at Island Rapids, are a possible cause.

STREAM SEDIMENT GEDQEMISTRY:

Because of the nature of the tributary streams in the upper part of the Nagagami River traverse (see section "Physiography and Quaternary Sediments"], and since there is no evidence of sediment redistribution by the stream flow, no sampling was done .

In the lower part of the river, particularly below Jackpine Rapids, the minor drainages are often swift due to their descent into the river valley. Transported silt and minor sand and clay is abundant, and the streams often have mini-deltas at their mouths. This accumulation of sediment probably occurs annually, since the spring ice breakup would likely sweep away previous accumu lations.

The results of geochemical analysis of 18 stream sediment samples from the lower part of the traverse are given in Appendix I, and sample locations are shown on the accompanying claim sheets. Gold was analyzed by fire assay - atomic absorption methods, and other metals by ICP analysis in the -80 mesh fraction. Analyses were performed by Chemex Labs Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario.

Little can be said of the stream sediment geochemistry. Results are uniformly low: less than 5 ppb Au, less than 0.5 ppm Ag, 4-9 ppm Co, 1-9 ppm Cu, less than 1 ppm Mo, 6-51 ppm Ni, less than 2-8 ppm Pb, 10-52 ppm Zn, D.70-1.80% Fe, and 145-830 ppm Mn. There are no clearly anomalous values. It is interesting, however, that the highest levels of Zn, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Pb are from the same sample (92-NG-13-S); the distinctly higher than normal Mn content [830 ppm vs. 145-390 ppm in other samples] may indicate metal scavenging by hydromorphous manganese minerals (e.g. wad).

DISCUSSION:

The interval of the Nagagami River between Melody Lake and Highway 11 is underlain by a migmatite complex consisting of metasedimentary paragneiss, injection phases of granodiorite and quartz monzonite, and pegmatite mobilizate. No evidence of metavolcanic rocks, iron formation nor significant sulphide mineralization was found. Extensive glacial and glaciolacustrune deposits, however, blanket bedrock; outcrop along the river is nowhere very abundant, and other unexposed rock types could explain weak aeromagnetic anomalies in the vicinity of the river. Because of the nature of the terrane, outcrop is probably virtually non-existent away from the river's margins, and ground traverses would likely be fruitless.

It was hoped that sediment geochemistry of tributary drainages could define areas of potential mineralization. Unfortunately, the drainages from the southern part of the traverse did not provide adequate sampling sites. Samples from the northern part did not provide results of interest.

The author plans no further prospecting or geological work in the area.

- 7 -

Respectfully submitted,

Robert M. Kuehnbaum, M.Se., FGAC Geologist

November 4, 1992

Innes, D.G., 1969, Pagwa River - Calstock sheet, Ont. Dept. Mines Geological Compilation Series, Preliminary Map P.552, scale 1 inch to E miles.

Prest, V.K., Grant, D.R., and Rampton, V., 19S8, Glacial Map of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Map 1253A. Canadian Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.

- 8 -

APPENDIX I

ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES

STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLES

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists ' Geochemists " Registered Assayers

5175 Timberlea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: KUEHNBAUM, MR. ROBERT

3101 O'HAGAN DR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C 2C4

Comments:

A9221827

CERTIFICATE A9221827

KUEHNBAUM, MR.ROBERT

Project: NAGAGAMI R. P.O. # :

Samples submitted to our lab in Mississauga, ON. This report was printed on 30-SEP-92.

SAMPLE PREPARATION

CHEMEXCODE

201229

NUMBERSAMPLES

1818

DESCRIPTION

Dry, sieve to -80 meshICP - AQ Digestion charge

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

CHEMEXCODE

100100519291931193219371938194010011950

NUMBERSAMPLES

18181818181818181818

DESCRIPTION METHOD

Au ppb: Fuse 10 g sample FA-AASAg ppm: 9 element, soil and rock ICP-AESCo ppm: 9 element, soil fc rock ICP-AESCu ppm: 9 element, soil t rock ICP-AESFe *: 9 element, soil 6 rock ICP-AESMn ppm: 9 element, soil t rock ICP-AESMo ppm: 9 element, soil t rock ICP-AESNi ppm: 9 element, soil t rock ICP-AESPb ppm: 9 element, soil and rock ICP-AESZn ppm: 9 element, soil k rock ICP-AES

DETECTION UPPERLIMIT LIMIT

5 100000.5 200

1 100001 10000

0.01 15.005 100001 100001 100005 100002 10000

CD

l

Chemex Labs Ltd.Analytical Chemists * Geochemists * Registered Assayers

5175 Timbertea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: KUEHNBAUM, MR. ROBERT

3101 O'HAGANDR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C 2C4

Project: Comments:

NAGAGAMI R.

Page Number : 1 Total Pages : 1 Certificate Date: 30-SEP-92 Invoice No. : 19221827 P.O. Number : Account : EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221 827

SAMPLE

92NG-01-292NG-02-292NG-O3-292NG-04-292NG-O5-2

92NG-O6-292NG-O7-292NG-O8-292NG-09-292NG-10-2

92NG-11-292NG-12-292NG-13-292NG-14-292NG-15-2

92NG-16-292NG-17-292NG-18-2

PREPCODE

2O12012012O1201

2O12O1201201201

2012O12O12O12O1

2012O1201

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229

Au ppbFA+AA

< 5< 5< 5< 5< 5

< 5< 5< 5< 5< 5

< 5< 5< 5< 5< 5

< 5< S< 5

Agppm

< 0.5< 0.5< O. 5< 0.5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0. 5< O. 5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5

Coppm

e54e5

e4445

669

Cuppm

43233

21113

25911

212

Fe*

1.751.66O. 811.701.42

1.441.231.04O.9O1.62

1.14l.OO1.8O1.1O1.02

0.88O. 97O.7O

Mnppm

2202O5390265205

22517522O230295

265240830145155

19528O175

MoPPm

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1

Nippm

14106

1210

111097

12

10102166

797

Pbppm

44264

42424

248

< 22

2< 2

4

Znppm

2020182022

222O2O1628

2O2O521412

162410

CERTIFICATION^

. ,- ...,, ..., n .. ,.ll MM ••III HIM Hill l

42F 1 5SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN

020

ON

1992

MAGNETIC AND VLF-EM SURVEYS

B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLING

AND

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING

BEAR BAY CLAIMS

Lsfce of The Hoods

Kenora Mining Division, Ontario

NTS: 52E/9SW

by

Robert: M. KuehnbaLm

31O1 O'Hagan Drive

Mississauga, Ontario

L5C 2C4

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS020C

1. SUMMARY 1

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS 4

3. THE PROPERTY 4

4. PREVIOUS WORK 4

5. OTHER WORK IN THE AREA 8

6. THE PRESENT SURVEY 9

7. REGIONAL GEOLOGY . 10

8. PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

8.1 Description and Geochemistry of Lithologic Units 12

8.2 Metamorphism, Alteration and Structure 17

8.3 Mineralization 13

9. MAGNETIC AND VLF-EM SURVEYS . . . . . . . . . . 20

10. B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

10.1 Soil Types and Vegetation . 22

10.2 Statistical Treatment of Results 23

10.3 Description of Soil Anomalies . 24

REFERENCES . 27

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS . 28

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I.

II.

III.

IV.

V.

VI.

VII.

ROCK DESCRIPTIONS . 29

ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES - ROCK SAMPLES . 33

ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES - B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLES . . 38

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY - STATISTICAL DATA

AND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAMS . 42

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . .51

LOG OF DRILLHOLE 0-5, HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND

DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED . 53

WHOLE ROCK AND TRACE ELEMENT GEOCHEMISTRY OF ROCK

SAMPLES BY LITHOLOGIC UNIT . 55

LIST DF TABLES

Table 1 . Table of Formations 13

2. B Horizon Soil Geochemistry, Statistical Pararmeters,

1991 and 1992 Samples 24

3. Copper in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency . 43

4. Zinc in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution and

Precent Cumulative Frequency 43

5. Cobalt in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Percent Cumulative Frequency . 45

6. Nickel in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Percent Cumulative Frequency . 45

7. Lead in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Percent Cumulative Frequency 47

S. Iron in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Percent Cumulative Frequency . 47

9. Manganese in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Percent Cumulative Frequency . 49

10. Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry of Mafic

Metavolcanic Flow Rocks . 56

11. Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples

of the Tuffaceous - Sedimentary Unit 57

12. Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples

of the Intermediate Tuff and Tuff-Breccia . 58

13. Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples

of Shear Zones. 59

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 . Regional Geology and Location of the Bear Bay Claims . 5

2. Geology of the Area Around the Bear Bay Property . . B

3. Capper in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency . 44

4. Zinc in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency . 44

LIST DF FIGURES (cont'd)

Figure 5. Cobalt in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency 46

B. Nickel in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency 46

7. Lead in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency 48

8. Iron in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency 48

3. Manganese in B Horizon Soils. Frequency Distribution

and Cumulative Percent Frequency 50

LIST OF PLANS

Plan 1. Geology S Rock Sample Locations . pocket

2. Magnetic Survey, Contoured Values . "

3. VLF-EM Survey, NAA, In-Phase S Quadrature Profiles . . "

4. VLF-EM Survey, NAA, Fraser Filtered Contours "

5. B Horizon Soil Geochemistry. Sample Locations and

Soil Description "

6. B Horizon Soil Geochemistry, Cu, Zn, Ag. Contoured

Values - Cu, Zn . . . . . . . . . .

7. B Horizon Soil Geochemistry, Co, Ni, Mo. Contoured

Values - Co, Ni . . . . . . . . . .

S. B Horizon Soil Geochemistry, Pb, Fe, Mn. Contoured

Values - Pb, Fe . . . . . . . . . .

9. Compilation. Simplified Geology, Geophysical Interpre

tation S B Horizon Soil Geochemical Anomalies . . "

- 111 -

REPORT ON

MAGNETIC AND VLF-EM SURVEYS

B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLING

AND

GEOLOGICAL HAPPING

BEAR BAY CLAIMS

Lake of the Woods

Kenora Mining Division, Ontario

NTS: 52E/3SH

1. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Bear Bay property was examined in 1991 and 1992 by geological,

VLF-EM, magnetic, B horizon soil sampling and rock sampling surveys.

The property is underlain by supracrustal rocks of the Monument Bay

group, part of the Upper Keewatin supergroup. The steeply north-dipping

sequence consists of - from bottom to top - massive mafic (high-Mg tholeiitic

basalt to andesite) flows, an assemblage of very fine-grained clastic metasedi-

mentary and distal aquagene felsic to intermediate tuffaceous rocks, and a unit

of lapilli tuff and tuff breccia of mostly magnesian tholeiitic basalt composition.

The sequence was subjected to regional metamorphism, probably accompanied by

east-west shearing, and intruded by irregular dykes of gabbro, and later by

granodiorite of the Viola Lake Stock.

Extensive sulphide mineralization was reported in a 1976 Hudson Bay

drillhole, located in the approximate centre of the grid. The sulphides,

consisting of weakly disseminated to semi-massive pyrrhotite with minor pyrite,

and up to V/e chalcopyrite and 1/S sphalerite, occur in two zones totalling 27.6 m.

Neither the drillhole location nor evidence of such extensive mineralization

was found at surface during the present survey. The hole was drilled on a broad

EM-17 conductor.

An east-west VLF-EM conductor traverses the entire 900-m long grid.

Iron oxide stained, locally possibly graphitic shears were found at several

localities along it. Overlying the conductor, soils are locally anomalous in

- 2 -

zinc (up to 785 ppm), copper, cobalt, nickel and iron; the zinc anomaly is

about 500 m long. The zone has no corresponding magnetic response.

A second conductor, at least 200 long and open to the west, lies to

the south. It is marked by a strong magnetic anomaly which continues to the

east. An exposure of pyrrhotite mineralization (about 2m wide], believed to

be shear-hosted, lies on the geophysical anomalies, but neither the rocks nor

soils in the area contain appreciable base or precious metals. Other weak soil

anomalies, however, lie on trend over magnetic highs.

Weak gold mineralization (760 ppb Au) was found in only one locality

where very minor quartz veinlets occur in tuff. There is no response of gold

in soils in the western part of the grid area.

Although no significant mineralization has been found in the 1991 and

1992 surveys, the problem of the extensive sulphides in the Hudson Bay drillhole

remains. It was originally thought that the mineralization was volcanogenic in

origin, but the geological environment - lacking proximal subaqueous tuffs and

breccias, chemical sediments and evidence of extensive magnesian or potassic

alteration - is not favourable for exhalative massive sulphides. The reported

sulphides may, however, be related to a shear which could potentially host gold

mineralization. A number of gold occurrences in the general area are related

to splays of the Pipestone - Cameron deformation zone, about 3 km south of the

Bear Bay property.

The most Favourable location for the Hudson Bay drillhole mineralization

is the southern conductor. It has associated sulphides at surface, has a corres

ponding magnetic anomaly suggesting buried sulphides (pyrrhotite), and is open

to the west. Lines which stopped short of the conductor in the western part

of the grid should be extended to the southern claim boundary, and be covered

with geological, geophysical and soil sampling surveys. Trenching of the known

mineralization and any other favourable areas, with detailed rock and soil

sampling, should be done. A few reconnaissance geophysical lines should also be

run south of the property to test for additional conductors. Because VLF-EM

cannot detect disseminated sulphide mineralization not associated with shears,

- 3 -

some lines in the vicinity of both conductors should be tested with HLEM, such

as MaxMin.

It is also recommended that trenching, with detailed rock and soil

sampling, be done over the main property-wide conductor. Although it is non

magnetic, limonite and reddish soils suggest some sulphides (pyrite?). in parti

cular, the broad zinc and minor copper, cobalt and nickel soil anomalies should

be examined. All further soil and rock samples should be analyzed for gold.

- 4 -

2 - LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property is located approximately 32 km (20 mi) southeast of

Kenora, and 18 km (11 mi) northwest of Sioux Narrows, between Bear Bay and

Adams River Bay of Lake of the Woods, and within the Eastern Peninsula (Figs.

152). Yellow Girl Bay, a main body of Lake of the Woods, lies about 0.6 km

(0.4 mi) to the south. Geographic coordinates of the centre of the property

are: 49O30'54" N lat; 94O 16'23" W long. The property is on the Yellow Girl

Bay claim sheet: G-2656.

Access is most easy by boat from Sioux Narrows or Kenora. Fixed

wing float aircraft are also available in Kenora, and barges travel Lake of

the Woods. Road access is not currently available, but logging haulage roads

have been recently built into the Jadikin Lake area about 6-7 km to the north,

and access waE planned into the vicinity of the Viola Lake stock towards the

property; it is not known, however, if the road has been constructed.

3. THE PROPERTY

The 4-unit property consists of two 2-unit claims. Claim K1161055

was staked on June 9 and 1O, 1991, and recorded on June 11, 1991. Claim K1191242

was staked on August 24, 1992, and recorded on August 25, 1992. Both claims

are held by Robert M. Kuehnbaum, 3101 O'Hagan Drive, Mississauga, Ontario,

L5C 2C4.

4 PREVIOUS WORK

Except for a small excavation on Bear Bay in the northwest corner

(discussed by Kuehnbaum, 1991), the only work known to have been done on the

property was by Hudson Bay Exploration and Development Company Limited. In 1372,

they carried out an airborne geophysical survey; the results of the survey are

not available in the assessment files, but are mentioned by MacTavish (1975).

In 1975, a ground followup survey was done, encompassing 165 claims (known as

"Group D") in the area. North-south lines were cut at 91.5 m (300 ft) spacings

with readings taken at 30.5 m (1OO ft) intervals. The instrumentation was a

Geonics EM-17 unit operating at a transmitting frequency of 1,SOO Hz; 3OO ft

LEGEND

PHANEROZOICCENOZOIC

QUATERNARY

PLEISTOCENE AND RECENT

Sand, gravel, clay.

UNCONfORMITY

PRECAMBRIANMIDDLE TO LATE PRECAMBRIAN

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

W Diabase dikes

FELSIC AND INTERMEDIATE INTRUSIVE

9 Unsubdivided9a Massive lo foliated, equigranular

and porphyritic quartz monzonite.granodiorite, trondhjemite, quartzdiorite, and granite

96 Gneissic (o foliated Irondniemite.quartz monzonite, granodiorite.quartz diorite

9c Quartz and leldspar porphyries

B unsubdivided equigranular and por phyritic rrtonzonite. syenodiorite, syenite, diorite and quartz diorite

8a Monzonite, syenodiorite, syenite86 Diorite, quartz diorite.

METAMORPHOSED MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

7 Unsubdivided malic intrusive rocks7a Gabbro, norite, diorite.7b Anorthosite, anorthosite gabbro.

6 Peridotite, pyroxenite.

INTRUSIVE CONTACTS'

METASEDIMENTS CHEMICAL METASEDIMENTS

5 Unsubdivided ironstone 5a Magnetite ironstone. So Pyrite Ironstone. Se Chert.

CLASTIC METASEDIMENTS

4 Unsubdivided4a Pebble and boulder conglomerite. 4b Sandstone, siltstone, argillite, and

derived schists. 4c Migmatite, metatexite.

METAVOLCANICSALKALIC MAFIC METAVOLCANICS

3 Unsubdivided. 3a Flows?

FELSIC TO INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANICS

2 Unsubdivided.la Flows'2b Tutl, agglomerate, and breccia*2c Migmatite.

MAFIC METAVOLCANICS

1 UnsubdMded 1 a Massive and pillowed Hows, tb Tuft, agglomerate, and breccia le Amphibolite, amphibolite gneiss,

and migmatite.

Legend for Figure 1

Ont. Geol. Survey Map

Figure 1Regional Geologyand Location of

THE BEAR BAY CLAIMSYellow Girl Bay

Kenora Mining Division

Scale: 1 inch to 4 miles Ont. Geol. Survey Map 2443

DEVONSHIRE f

LEGEND*PMAMBUZOIC

CtNOICC MMTBMMT

LEBTOCiNi AND moon

ircatemm

i Hta. M Mratm ro wmisnc CONTACTUTTAUOKPHCttO K.THAUAFC KTHUSIVI ROCKS

FBtCMIjRIlM PNOTCHO20IC

MAFIC INTHUtWl ROCK*

neut amtlie (jrier*!! layering l M

16 leM DrMeremlallon layering

nment CONTACTAMCMEAN

FELSIC afTRUSVf RCCKt

10 ice———' ir*

lOc MonnHie10d Oueru Monzcdkxae10. bon*

lOg AlkaM tetdspv megaorystt ion Plagioclase phenocryst! 10| Quartz phenocryns 10k FeMs: epMe 10m Intrusion breeds 10n Igneous layering

KTSUSnt CONTACT

UAFC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

M QaMre.dk>*>

•d Hornblende phanocryitsM Plagioclase phenocryst!If Inna phenccrynslg Rounded mdutrawen Highly mined

•/TRuSf* CONTACT

METAMOWHOSED MTERMEOIATE TO FELSIC INTRUSIVE

If Carbonatued

ffmuent CONTACTMtTAIEOMOrTAItV ROCKP

4a wacke (Hne-grarnad)

4C4d

mnnneChert: sWcaoua sMalone

4a Uudsione41 Conglomerate, tuff breccia4g Tulleceous wacke4h4| SmpNds Ironatone4k Cross-bedding

4P 40.

SIHFOM* pofphyroblftsuMonoMNc granAoltf-etatl

ra

AIUH MOW* m^Kfym

M QnrexMrlMIb ToiUMtle Omni monzodiarfk*td Ouwu ana*, aant

lgin

Im Strongly foHM*d. gnalsslc

HTBUSnf CONTACT

METAMOVHOSED WTEHMEOIATE TO FELSC POKPHVtlY fmoavt ROCKS"

4s Highly named

FUSIC METAVOLOMC ROCKS1 (rfiyoHuc lo decrlrc)

3a Tuff3b LapHVUff3c Tuff breccia3d Pyroclastic breccia30 Bedded tuft, tuffaceous wacke3f Vofcanrc-clesl congkxnarite3g Maislve flow3h Laminated flow31 Flow breccia3k Plagioclase phanooysts3m Ouam phenocrystsIn Highly strained3p Carbonatized3r Sencrnted

MAFIC TO HTERMEDIATE UETAVOLCAKIC ROCKS1 (andelltIC

Quartz phmocrysa

ra 71 Ouaru phanocrystt7b Plagloclaia phanocf ytit

7d Anpnaota pharncrysB7a FarsMa: apMM71 HioMy mmad7g Otxnanndm Sanaiiiao

rfmusnf CONTACT

METAMOflPHOSEO MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

ra U MXiragiMraMi Ometmtc LKCogutraId Oumz gabbro: quartz dkxHala PtagnctM* phanoaytn (laopard rock)

lg Olffcrmliallon MyanngIn Mghly mlnadIt Cwtonaiaad

2l TuK2b Lapmiuff2c Tuff breccle2d Pyroclastic breccle2a Bedded luff: tuffaceous weeks

2g Missive flow2h PWow breccia: How breccia21 Amygdaloidal2k Plagioclase phenocrysts2m Pyroxene phenocrysts2n Highly strained2p CarbonatizedM AmphiboMlzed: MMized

2s Garnet porphyroblast*MAFIC METAVOLCANIC BOCKS* (besarnc to basalKc komeimlc)

li Fine-grained, mesilve flowit medtum-grained. messtve flow41C PWowedflowId AmygdaloldilII VerrolllK11 Plegjodase phenocrysts (leopiril rock)1g Pillow breccia, flow breccia hyaloclastite1h Tuff11 LaprlliluffIk Tuft breccia1m MagneticIn Garnet porphyroblast.tp Highly mmed1q CarbonatizedIr Eprdolized

Legend for Figure

From OGS Preliminary Map P.3121 (Ayer and others, 1988)

lmi

Figure 2. Geology of the area around the Bear Bay property, with locations of previous drillholes and property boundary. From Ayer and others [1988), O.G.S. Map P. 3121. Scale 1 inch to \ mile (1:15,840).

7

cable separation was used. Numerous conductors, with strike lengths varying

from 91.5 m (3OO ft) to 4.8 km (3 mi), and with characteristics indicative of

sulphide or graphite mineralization, were located. A few anomalies were explained

by conductive overburden and lake bottom effects (MacTavish, 1975).

In 1976, several holes were drilled by Hudson Bay to test conductors.

One of these, drillhole D-5 (-50 , north-facing), tested a 549 m (1,800 ft)

long conductor which is broad and strong on its west end, and narrow and of

moderate strength on its east end. The approximate location of the drillhole

is shown on Figure 2. The 31.7 m (104 ft) drillhole intersected a 7.47 m (24.5 ft)

zone of sulphide mineralization from 7.47 m (24.5 ft) to 14.9 m (49.0 ft) con

taining S-10% to semi-massive pyrrhotite with minor pyrite and trace chalco

pyrite and sphalerite. From 16.3 m (53.5 ft) to 26.5 m (87.0 ft), continuous

sulphide (mostly pyrrhotite) mineralization was reported, varying from "slight"

to ID-15%, including minor zones (0.3 m or less) with semi-massive pyrrhotite,

and up to '\ a/,, sphalerite and W, chalcopyrite. The host rock was reported to be

andesite with "occasional quartz-carbonate". The log of drillhole D-5 (Lambert,

1976) is given in Appendix VI. The precise location of the drillhole with res

pect to the present grid is unknown, but is likely around line 4E.

Other Hudson Bay drillholes in the area, but not on the current

property, are shown on Figure 2. Drillhole D-3, on an island in Yellow Girl

Bay, intersected two narrow (0.3 m and 0.6 m) graphite-pyrite zones. Southwest

of the property, drillhole D-1 intersected S-10% pyrite and pyrrhotite in a 0.6 m

zone in andesite, and drillhole D-2 cut an 8.5 m (28 ft) zone of banded graphite

and andesite (Lambert, 1976). According to A. Lambert (pers. comm., 1992), the

core from all drillholes in the area was stored on a small island in Yellow

Girl Bay.

In 1991, a small amount of exploration work was done by the author on

the original 2-unit claim (K1161055). This included VLF-EM and magnetic surveys

on four 100-m spaced chain-and-compass lines just east of Bear Bay. Geological

mapping, rock sampling and B horizon soil sampling were also done on the grid.

The work outlined two VLF-EM conductors reflecting the western end on the

Hudson Bay EM-17 conductor. Magnetic anomalies not directly associated with the

conductors were also delineated, but could net be explained. The limited soil

- 8 -

sampling defined possible anomalies in Cu, Zn, Co, Ni and Fe over and around the

conductors, and less directly around the magnetic anomalies. The results of the

survey were thoroughly discussed by Kuehnbaum f 1991), and all of the data are

inccrporated into that collected during the present study.

Government geological studies in the area include mapping by the

Ontario Department of Mines at a scale of 1 mile to 1 inch (Fraser, 1945),

and more recently by the Ontario Geological Survey at a scale cf \ mile to

1 inch (Ayer and others, 1988).

5. OTHER WORK IN THE AREA

Other work in the region surrounding the Bear Bay property has

focussed on gold and base metals potential. Approximately 2.4 km northwest,

in the northwest erd of Bear Bay, there are two sites of old (pre-1900?) shafts

and pits on quartz veins (Ayer and others, 1988); these were staked by W. Why-

mark around 1987, but ne significant work was done. About 7 km to the northwest

of the property, in the P.O.W. Bay area, Cominco Limited in 1968, and Kerr

Addison Mines Limited in 1973 carried out unsuccessful base metals exploration,

including diamond drilling on geophysical targets (see Ayer and others, 1988).

The Pipestone-Cameron deformation zone (PCDZ) traverses Yellow Girl

Bay about 2.8 km south of the property. The PCDZ is a major high strain system

traceable for at least 75 km from the Cameron Lake area to the central part of

Lake of the Woods. A number of gold occurrences related to the PCDZ include

the Cameron Lake deposit, occurrences at Sioux Narrcws (e.g. Regina Bay mine)

and around Flint and Caviar Lakes. The Yellow Girl Bay prospect, about 2.4 km

south of the Bear Bay property, has been drilled, but no work has been done in

recent years. The Chisholm Island prospect, about 8.8 km west of Bear Bay, was

intensively explored by a Noranda-Ncrcnt joint venture in 1989. At least 10

drillholes were put down, but the results of only the discovery hole were

reported: D.65% Cu, 0.42 cz/t Au and 1.42 oz/t Ag across 7.9 ft (the Northern

Miner, May 22,1989).

- 9 -

6. THE PRESENT SURVEY

The 1992 geophysical, geological and geochemical surveys were done

on August 25-28 and 30, 1992. The work was supervised by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

who did the VLF-EM and geological surveys. Donald R. Hawke, #302-1800 Bloor

Street East, Mississauga, Ontario, L4X 2S1, carried out the magnetic survey and

assisted in the soil sampling. A minor amount of prospecting was also done

previously [August 24, 1992] to the east oF the present property boundary; the

data are included in this report.

The flagged chain-and-compass grid started in 1991 was extended a

further BOO m with six 10O-m spaced crosslines tied to the northern east-west

claim boundary. Two fill-in lines were established from the southern claim line

to detail the area of magnetic and VLF-EM anomalies and a sulphide occurrence.

The grid certainly encompasses the location of Hudson Bay drillhole 0-5, but no

evidence was found; 0-5 was a Winkie drillhole, which would have caused minimal

ground disturbance. The 1992 crosslines total 2,690 m, and were flagged at 10-

or 20-m intervals.

VLF-EM and magnetic readings were taken at 20-m intervals in the nor

thern part of the grid, and at 10-m intervals in the south over geophysical

anomalies. Magnetic readings, taken with a Geometrics G816 proton magnetometer,

were corrected for diurnal variation along the baseline, and separately along

each crossline; drift was minimal. VLF-EM readings were taken with a Geonics

EM-1G unit. A total of 20G VLF-EM readings and 207 magnetic readings were taken

in 1992 along 2,G90 m of crossline. Contoured magnetic data are presented on

Plan 2, and VLF-EM profiles and Fraser filtered data are given on Plans 3 and

4, respectively.

Geological mapping included grab and composite grab sampling of expo

sures and in situ material on the grid. A total of 20 rock samples from the

grid area, and 3 samples from east of the property were submitted for various

combinations of trace metal and wholerock analysis to Chemex Labs Ltd.,

Mississauga, Ontario. Rock descriptions are given in Appendix I; analytical

certificates in Appendix II, and; analytical procedures in Appendix V.

- 10 -

Locations of rock samples are shown on Plan 1.

B horizon soil samples were taken on all 8 lines, mostly in areas of

geophysical anomalies; swamps, which were unusually wet in 1992, did not permit

sampling in some key areas around geophysical anomalies in the southern parts

of lines 3+50E to 4+50E. The southern limit of sampling on lines 5E to SE was

determined by a deep swamp. At least 500 gm of material were taken at each

site, at a depth of 20-30 cm, using a pick and trowel. A total of 92 samples

were taken along 960 m of line, and submitted to Chemex Labs Ltd., Mississauga,

Ontario, for multi-element analysis. Results are presented in Appendix III,

and analytical procedures are given in Appendix V. In 1991, 40 soil samples

were taken in the western part of the grid; data from these samples have been

incorporated into the statistical treatment of geochemical results (Appendix IV)

and on accompanying geochemical plots (Plans 5 to 9 ) .

7. REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Bear Bay property lies within the Lake of the Woods greenstone

belt (LWGB) in the northwestern part of the Wabigoon subprovince. It consists

of a metamorphosed assemblage of volcanic and sedimentary rocks, intruded by

granitoid rocks, many of batholithic size.

The Ontario Geological Survey, through systematic remapping in the

1980's and synoptic studies, has recently established stratigraphic subdivisions

in the LWGB (Ayer and others, 1991]. The supracrustal rocks are divided into

three supergroups. The Lower Keewatin supergroup (LKS) consists of magnesian

and iron-rich tholeiites, suggestive of sea-floor and island-arc assemblages,

respectively.

The Upper Keewatin supergroup (UKS), unconformably overlying the LKS,

consists of three main assemblages: (1) calc-alkaline volcanic rocks, volcani

clastic and chemical sediments; (2] turbiditic sedimentary rocks, and; (3)

mafic to ultramafic tholeiitic and komatiitic flows. The UKS is interpreted

to represent an island-arc assemblage. From the stratigraphic compilation of

Ayer and others (1991), the Bear Bay property lies within the Monument Bay group,

- 11 -

which consists principally of calc-alkalic to shoshonitic mafic to felsic volcanic

rocks, with subordinate tholeiitic to komatiitic mafic flows, conglomerates,

turbidites and chemical sedimentary rocks.

The overlying Electrum Lake supergoup, consisting of predominantly

clastic sedimentary rocks, lies further to the north from the Bear Bay area.

The LWGB has undergone two major periods of deformation. The first,

a north-south compressive event, resulted in subhorizontal, tight folds with

steeply dipping foliation, and dip-slip movement of narrow thrust faults. The

second event produced east-west trending subvertical folds with a steeply

dipping fabric. Broad deformation zones, such as the Pipestone - Cameron

deformation zone south of the Bear Bay property, developed during this period.

A third event, producing subhorizontal open folds, is of significance only

around post-tectonic intrusions such as the Viola Lake Stock (Ayer and others,

1991].

The area encompassing the Bear Bay property - the Chisholm Island

sheet - was most recently mapped by Ayer and others (1988]. The subsequent

regional synthesis and stratigraphic subdivisions of Ayer and others [1991]

has replaced the stratigraphy of Ayer and others (1988] . South of the Viola

Lake Stock (unit 1O, Fig. 2], two main sequences are present: (1] mafic to

felsic volcanic rocks, including flows and fragmentals, and intercalated wacke

and siltstone (units 2 and 4, Fig. 2], and; (2] tholeiitic to komatiitic basaltic

rocks intercalated with (1] (unit 1, Fig. 2]. Further south, sedimentary rocks

of the Warclub group, also part of the Upper Keewatin supergroup, are exposed

on islands in Yellow Girl Bay (unit 4, Pewabic Island, Fig. 2]; they appear to

be similar to some sediments on the Bear Bay property, but no examination was

made during the present study. Metamorphosed synvolcanic dykes and sills cut

the layered rocks in the region surrounding the Bear Bay property. Mafic bodies

are differentiated from peridotite/pyroxenite to gabbro. Granitoid rocks include

early, weakly to strongly foliated bodies such as the Aulneau Batholith, lying

about 8 km south of the property, and late, massive granodiorite such as the

1. The "upper diverse group" and "upper mafic group" of Ayer and others (1988]

are now included in the Monument Bay group.

- 12 -

Viola Lake Stock. Volcanic and sedimentary rocks are metamorphosed to the

greenschist facies; adjacent to intrusive bodies, such as the Viola Lake

Stock, the metamorphic grade is amphibolite facies. The highly schistose and

carbonatized Pipestone - Cameron deformation zone, about 3 km south of the

property, is up to 1.5 wide, and there are numerous smaller shears splaying

from it (Ayer and others, 1988).

8. PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

8.1 Description and Geochemistry of Lithologic Units

Geology and rock sample locations are presented on Plan 1. A table

of formations is given on Table 1. No stratigraphic indicators, such as graded

bedding-or pillow tops, were found during the present survey, but Ayer and others

[1988) indicated bedding tops to the north, just east of the property and in the

same units which underlie the property; they also indicated an anticlinal axis

just south of the claims [Fig. 2). In lack of geological evidence to the

contrary, and an apparent lack of geophysical evidence for structural contact

between the units [i.e. shears and conductors transgress rock boundaries, see

sections B.2 and 9), the sequence on the property is assumed to be homoclinal,

upright [steeply inclined) of northward decreasing age.

Descriptions of rock samples analyzed from the various units are

given in Appendix I. For clarity, whole rock and trace metal geochemical analyses

given in Appendix II are presented in tabular form, rearranged according to

rock type, in Appendix VII. Rock classification discussed below is based on

standard Na O * K O vs SiO FeO + TiO - MgO - Al O , Nb/Y vs Zr/TiO plots ^ ^ c "C ^ c J t.

and FM ratios C10OxFeO/FeQ 4- MgO); diagrams are not presented for these

calculations.

Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks [mmv)

Mafic metavolcanic flow rocks [mmv) are exposed in the southern part of

the property and in small areas within the intermediate tuff/tuff breccia unit

south of the Viola Lake Stock [Plan 1). They are uniform massive flows, and

- 13 -

TABLE 1

TABLE DF FORMATIONS

PHANEROZOIC

CENOZOIC

QUATERNARY

Pleistocene

Glacial deposits, till of variable composition

PRECAMBRIAN

ARCHEAN

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS, VIOLA LAKE STOCK

gd Biatite-granodiorite

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

gb Gabbro

di Biotite-diorite

METASEDIMENTARY AND METAVOLCANIC ROCKS

UPPER KEEEWATIN SUPERGROUP

MONUMENT BAY GROUP

itv Intermediate tuff and tuff-breccia

ts Sedimentary rocks and tuffaceous sedimentary rocks:

wacke, siltstone, distal aquagene intermediate to

felsic tuffs

mmv Mafic metavolcanic flows

- 14 -

display no primary features [vesicles, pillows etc.). At L9E/2+80S, the unit

has a somewhat tuffaceous appearance, but it may be brecciated since it is

adjacent to a shear. The rocks are greyish-green, and very fine- to fine

grained. Amphibole is the dominant mafic mineral. They are locally slightly

schistose, chloritic, and contain minute seams or streaks of calcite, particu

larly near known or interpreted shears. Rare biotite alteration occurs near

one sulphide-mineralized zone. Samples typical of this unit are: 92-BB-1008,

-1013, 1O14 and 1018.

Whole rock analyses (Table 10, Appendix VII) show the rocks to be

high-Mg tholeiitic basalt to andesite. Sample 92-BB-1008 falls in the range

of high-Mg basaltic komatiite. All samples have FM ratios of 49.4 to 59.7

(average 56.8/0. Although two of the samples (92-BB-1013 and -1018) lie near

shears or sulphide mineralization, they do not appear to be significantly altered

on the basis of their low LOI contents.

Tuffaceous - Sedimentary Unit (ts)

This enigmatic assemblage of rocks traverses the property; it is of

fairly uniform thickness in the central and eastern areas of the grid, but widens

considerably to the west. Ayer and others (1988) mapped the rocks as siltstone,

mudstone and wacke. This study has also shown the rocks to be clastic, including

siltstone and probable wacke; it is also believed that there is, in part, a

tuffaceous volcanic component. Ayer and others (1988) may have benefitted by

petrographic studies, since mapping is made difficult by generally poor, lichen

and grass covered, broken outcrops consisting of heaved blocks.

Rock descriptions of analyzed samples (Appendix I) and whole rock

and trace geochemical analyses (Table 11, Appendix VII) include samples

92-BB-1OOO, -1OO1, -1O03, -1OO4, -1OO6, -1O1O and -1O15).

The rocks are poorly to moderately bedded (cm-scale), and faintly

schistose. Weathering surfaces are generally buff to pale reddish-brown due to

the oxidation of trace sulphides (pyrrhotite); fresh surfaces are tan to dark

greenish-brown. Very fine grain size precludes positive hand specimen identifi

cation of most of the constituent minerals, although quartz, and to a lesser

-15 -

extent, whitish feldspar predominate. Biotite (about 5X) is reasonably wide

spread; white mica (sericite or muscovite) is rare.

A few outcrops were mapped as siltstone (ts ) or wacke (ts ), butst w

most rocks are of uncertain origin, and could be classified as either clastic

sedimentary of distal aquagene tuffaceous in nature. These are noted on Plan

1 as ts or ts . Scattered outcrops on the 1991 grid (LO to L3E) were st t w t

originally mapped as felsic tuffs; these areas were not remapped in 1992, and

are shown as uncertain tuff (ts ?) on Plan 1. Whole rock analyses (Table 11)

are not diagnostic. Samples 92-BB-1000 and -1003 could be classified as calc-

alkaline dacitic or rhyolitic tuff, but they could equally be - from high Al O

feldspathic siltstone. Sample 92-BB-1006 does not consistently fall within

any volcanic field, and it is probably a wacke. The analysis for sample

92-BB-1015 is suspect (see footnote, Table 11).

Intermediate Tuff/Tuff Breccia (itv)

This unit lies immediately south of the Viola Lake Stock. It is

exposed across about 140 m on L8E and L9E, and is cut off by the Viola Lake

Stock on its west end. It is also exposed on excellent shoreline outcrops

on Adams River Bay just east of the property, and was observed (but not mapped)

around the NE (#1) claim post of K1191242. Two small zones are intercalated in

the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit.

The main unit is readily distinguishable. Although grossly fairly

uniform, the unit is comprised of a very fine-grained, (grey-) green groundmass

with fragments of more mafic (dark green) and less mafic (greenish-cream)

composition. Dark green amphibole and quartzo-feldspathic material predominate.

The clasts vary in size up to 20 cm long, and are moderately flattened; where

outcrop is obscured by vegetation, a crude bending is probably due to flattened

fragments. The main unit can in many areas be considered a tuff-breccia

because of fragment size (samples 92-BB-1005, -1007, 92-BBP-001, -002, -003).

The intercalations within the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit have much smaller,

lapilli-sized fragments (sample 92-BB-1002). The unit is everywhere slightly

to moderately schistose.

- 16 -

A typical, but not exclusive Feature oF the tuFF unit is the presence

oF dark green/black pyroxene (possibly local hornblende?] porphyroblasts

about 2-4 mm in length. Ayer and others f 1988) mapped this unit as amphibolitized

lapilli tuFF, tuFF breccia and/or bedded tuFF/tuFFaceous wacke with pyroxene

phenocrysts and local garnet porphyroblasts. The pyroxene is Felt to actually

be porphyroblastic because the grains are mostly randomly oriented despite

stretching oF the tuFF Fragments, and because they also occur in massive maFic

volcanic rocks adjacent to the Viola Lake Stock.

Despite the apparent heterogeneity oF the main unit, whole rock analyses

oF hand specimens returned quite uniForm compositions [Table 12, Appendix VII].

The sample oF lapilli tuFF (92-BB-1002] i s distinctive because oF its relatively

high Al O and Na O contents, and low CaO and K O contents; in this respect, it

is chemically more similar to the maFic metavolcanic (mmv] unit. All rocks,

however, Fall within the range oF tholeiitic basalt; despite their appearance in

the Field oF being more intermediate in composition than the maFic Flow rocks

(mmv], they are actually somewhat more basic, based in SiO contents. The FM

ratios vary From S3.4/6 (high Mg tholeiite] to 7B.B'/, (high Fe tholeiite]; the

highest ratio occurs in a sample (92-BBP-002] with about 3/S pyrrhotite, and

is Felt to be biased. The Zr/TiO and Nb/Y ratios are typical oF tholeiites,

except For sample 92-BBP-003 which has a very high Zr/TiO ratio oF O.11, typical

oF much more Felsic rocks; the Zr content oF 80O ppm cannot be explained.

Metagabbro and Diorite (gb, di]

Metagabbro (gb] is exposed in several localities in the eastern part oF

the property, cutting both the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit and the intermediate

tuFF unit. The bodies appear to be lensoidal. It is massive, medium-grained,

typically gabbroic-textured, and is composed oF dark green hornblende and

saussuritized(?] plagioclase. There is no Fabric, and the rock was probably

intruded subsequent to regional metamorphism. A magnetically interpreted gabbro

body, overlying gabbro outcrop, traverses stratigraphy between L5E/2+15S and

L1E/2+80S (see Plan 9, and section 9] is apparently oFFset by conjugate Faulting

thought to be related to intrusion oF the Viola Lake Stock; the gabbro thereFore

predates the granodiorite.

- 17 -

A small body of massive, medium-grained biotite-diorite is poorly

exposed near L7E/2+15S. It occurs nowhere else in the general area (Fig. 2),

and may be a contaminated(?) phase of the gabbroic rocks.

Biotite-Granodiorite

On the property, the rocks of the Viola Lake Stock are quite uniform.

The granodiorite is typically white, greyish, buff, or pink weathering, massive

and medium-grained (3-5 mm). The pinkish varieties are due to irregularly distri

buted zones of concentration of Kfeldspar megacrysts up to several cm in size.

The rock is composed of plagioclase, quartz, minor Kfeldspar and less than 5/S

biotite. Poorly developed 'dry' fracture/joint surfaces locally contain patches

of black tourmaline.

The contact of the Viola Lake Stock is intrusive and does not appear

to have been structurally modified. On L3E, the contact irregularly cuts mafic

flow rock; an apophysis is suggested on L5E. A few smaller bodies of granodiorite

south of the contact are much finer-grained (1-2 mm), and have an aplitic

appearance.

8.2 Metamorphism, Alteration and Structure

As noted above, metamorphism of the supracrustal rocks throughout

the property appears to have attained amphibolite facies metamorphic grade;

dark amphibole in the mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks is ubiquitous. The

presence of pyroxene in some of the tuff/tuff breccia and mafic flow units near

the Viola Lake Stock implies local pyroxene-hornfels metamorphism, although this

is unlikely in the aureole of a granitoid body. Chlorite is present only as a

retrograde mineral associated with suspected or confirmed shears.

Penetrative deformational fabric is inconsistent. Much of the mafic

metavolcanic (mmv) unit is massive, but is locally to weakly schistose. Fabric

in the tuff/tuff breccia (itv) unit is expressed by flattened fragments and weak

schistosity. Fabric in these two volcanic units is probably subdued because of

the scarcity of micaceous minerals. Schistosity in the tuffaceous - sedimentary

- 18 -

unit (ts], due to the presence of biotite, is modest, and appears to be parallel

to bedding where evident. Schistosity dips 75 to 85 north, mostly 80 .

Shearing occurs at a number of localities. All but one of these are

associated with VLF-EM conductor axes (see section 9). At L1E/2+60S, the

felsic metavolcanic rock(?) of unit ts is sericitic, schistose and limonite-

stained (Kuehnbaum, 1991). On L7E/2+80S, along the same conductor, sheared

rock was exposed in broken bedrock in a soil pit; the rock is rotted, limo-

nitic, and slightly schistose, and contains sericite and quartz 'eyes' (sample

92-BB-1009]. Further east (L9E/E+80S], rubble on a hillslope, surrounded by

mafic metavolcanic rock, is highly siliceous, dark grey (probably graphitic],

and contains white and limonitic laminae (to H-5 mm]; the unit, probably 1-3 m

wide, resembles an argillaceous siltstone but is interpreted as a shear [samples

92-BB-1011 and -1012].

On L3+50E/3+30S, another rubbly zone (approximately 2 m wide] exposes

a probable shear. The siliceous, chlorite-sericite-bearing material is highly

oxidized, but still contains AaA pyrrhotite and minor pyrite and chalcopyrite(?]

(sample 92-BB-1019]. This zone is located on a geophysically interpreted shear

(section 9]. The enveloping mafic metavolcanic rocks are slightly biotite- and

pyrrhotite-enriched (samples 92-BB-1017 and -1O18].

Another interpreted shear of unknown dimensions at L4+50E/2+50S is

exposed as rubble in a soil pit. It is heavily limonite-stained, friable and

chloritic (sample 92-BB-1016].

Whole rock analyses of samples of shears are given in Table 13. When

compared with other whole rock data of the rocks in which they occur, they are

characterized by high LOI contents reflecting hydrated Fe oxides (limonite]

and mica, spotty enrichment in Fe O and CaO (calcite alteration?], and spotty

depletion in Al O .

Faulting was nowhere observed on the grid. Faint northeast trending

lineaments on airphotos, visible on the ground as as valleys between outcrop

ridges at the southern ends of L1E to L3E, are interpreted to be faults which

sinistrally offset stratigraphy. Although conductor axes have not been interpreted

to" be offset, they could easily do so. Other magnetically interpreted northeast

- 19 -

and northwest trending faults further east offset gabbro bodies and magnetic

trends (section 9, Plan 9}. These faults are believed to have developed during

emplacement of the Viola Lake Stock.

An old pit on Bear Bay (Plan 1] exposes yellow-weathering, intensely

argillized granodiorite and/or felsite cut by a stockwork (550 of 1-30 cm

white, vuggy quartz veinlets. Minor limonite pseudomorphs after marcasite (?)

occur in the quartz, and many fractures are coated with Mn-oxides (Kuehnbaum,

1991). The cause of this alteration is unexplained, but the pit lies on trend

with a weak conductor (shear?) crossing LO and L1E to the east.

8.3 Mineralization

The set-up of 1976 Hudson Bay diamond drillhole D-5 was not located

despite careful examination of the most probable area around L4E. The drillhole

penetrated 2.4 m of overburden (Appendix VI), so it could have been located

anywhere not on outcrop. From the geophysical plans of MacTavish (1975),

L39+OOE on the Hudson Bay grid lies about 7BO m west of the tip of the inlet

on Adams River Bay, or around L4E on the present grid; the location of 4+05N

given on the drill log, however, is obviously in error with respect to the

Hudson Bay grid (should be more than 50+OON). Since the drillhole cut only

'andesite', it could be assumed that it was put down in the area of the minera

lization found at conductor V2 (Plan 9) since the main property-wide conductor

V1 lies within the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit around L4E.

Regardless, no mineralization was found at surface comparable to that

described in drillhole D-5. The best mineralization (L3+50E/3+30S, sample

92-BB-1019, Appendix I) consists of a roughly 'S. m wide zone, interpreted as s

shear (see section 8.2, above) containing pyrrhotite, and possible pyrite and

chalcopyrite. The sample contained only 52 ppm Cu, 92 ppm Zn, ^5 ppb Au, and

no significant amounts of other metals.

Very low base and precious metals values were returned for grab samples

from the property-wide shear (V1 on Plan 9), reflected by samples 92-BB-1001,

-1009, -1011, and -1012 (Table 13, Appendix VII). They contain maxima of

C.0.5 ppm Ag, 95 ppm Cu, 14 ppm Pb, 50 ppm Zn and <5 ppb Au. The limonitic

- 20 -

shear at L4+50E/2+50S is also unmineralized, but contains slightly higher

Cu: 215 ppm.

Pyrrhotite is very widely distributed in minor amounts fl-2%). Rock

samples were routinely analyzed for base and precious metals (Tables 10 to 12,

Appendix VII). Results are low: ^.5 ppm Ag, 16-198 ppm Cu, 20-108 ppm Zn,

as well as very low contents of Pb, Co and Ni. Au contents are low (-45 to 15

ppb), except sample 92-BB-1002, with 760 ppb Au; this sample of intermediate

tuff contains minor 1-2 mm quartz-carbonate veinlets which are probably gold-

enriched.

Kuehnbaum C1991) channel- and grab-sampled the old pit on Bear Bay.

Samples contained *5-20 ppb Au, 168-391 ppm Cu, 2-16 ppm Pb, 14-82 ppm Zn, and

*0.5 ppm Ag.

9. MAGNETIC AND VLF-EM SURVEYS

Contoured magnetic readings (Plan g] and VLF-EM profiles (Plan 3)

incorporate data from 1991 (LO to L3E) and 1992 (L3+50E to L9E). Fraser

filtered data (Plan 4) were calculated to assist in conductor interpretation.

Plan 9 is a compilation map of simplified geology, soil geochemistry and geophy

sical interpretation. The locations of VLF-EM conductors, magnetic bodies,

magnetic domains and structures shown on Plan 9 were interpreted by F.L.

Jagodits, P. Eng., Consulting Geophysicist, Toronto, Ontario. The ensuing

description of the results was, however, prepared by the author following

discussions with F.L. Jagodits regarding his interpretation.

Only two magnetic domains are evident. The northern domain (Gr) is

of magnetically low relief, with readings - excluding weak anomalies - in the

range of about 59,200 nT to 59,400 nT. Domain Gr actually incorporates several

lithologic units. Readings over the intermediate tuff/tuff breccia (itv) unit

are actually somewhat lower (by 50 -75 nT) than over the Viola Lake Stock.

Domain Gr incorporates part of the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit (ts) in the

west, and mafic metavolcanic rocks (mmv) in the east, where background response

does not differ significantly from that in the northern part of the property.

- 21 -

The southern domain (V) is interpreted to represent a volcanic regime,

and shows considerable magnetic relief. The prominent anomaly M1, evident

From L1E to L5E (possibly to LBE, Plan 9) is interpreted to be due to gabbro;

it overlies at one location a gabbro outcrop at least 15 m wide. Response is

up to +61.400 nT, or about 1,900 to 2,000 nT above background. A small anomaly

at the north end of L4+50E is thought to be a fault-offset portion of this body.

The gabbro is clearly a pinch-and-swell dyke which transgresses supracrustal

boundaries; it is younger than the mafic metavolcanic (mmv) and tuffaceous -

sedimentary (ts) units.

M2 is a second anomaly trend extending from L3E to LBE. At line 5E,

it is strongest ( about +600 nT) where it overlies gabbro outcrop. At its

western end, it is also interpreted to be due to gabbro; other areas may be

due to magnetic flows within the mafic metavolcanic unit or thinner, less magnetic

gabbro bodies. It lies oblique to the boundary of units mmv and itv. Other

gabbro and diorite in outcrop is not magnetic.

M3 is a cluster of magnetic bodies interpreted by F.L. Jagodits to be

due to magnetic zones within mmv. On L4+50E, however, the strongest part of the

anomaly C+2,400 nT) directly overlies shear-related pyrrhotite mineralization.

On LBE, the anomaly (up to +1,100 nT) is very broad, and partly overlies outcrop

of mmv with trace pyrrhotite; it is interpreted to be the result of two separate

magnetic bodies: one extending east from the zone of pyrrhotite mineralization;

the other of volcanic origin, to the south.

Anomaly M4 (about +400 nT, LO) is also interpreted to be of volcanic

origin, but its orientation and presence within the tuffaceous - sedimentary

unit (ts) also suggests possible gabbro, or even pyrrhotite mineralization.

The most prominent VLF-EM conductor (V1) is of fair strength, and

traverses the property. It is interpreted to be continuous, but geological

evidence suggests that it could be slightly offset on the west end (see section

8.2). It is directly related to three exposures of interpreted shearing (L1E,

L7E, L9E). These zones, described in sections 8.2 and 8.3, are of unknown width,

although that on L9E is in the order of 1-3 m wide. They are limonitic, possibly

due to oxidized sulphides, and are possibly graphitic. Significantly, there

- 22 -

is no magnetic responsed corresponding with conductor V1, suggesting that any

sulphide mineralization would not include pyrrhotite. The conductor/shear

transgresses major litholgic boundaries.

Conductor V2, approximately 200 m in length and open to the west, is

related to the shear-related pyrrhotite mineralization at surface which is

reflected by magnetic anomaly M3. The conductor axis lies slightly to the north

of the exposure, suggesting that additional shearing and/or sulphide mineralization

may lie under low ground at the base of the slope.

Conductor V3 is weak, and lies within the tuffaceous - sedimentary unit

(ts). Its significance is due to a roughly related magnetic anomaly (M4) and

soil geochemical anomalies. Conductor V4, also weak, is underlain by a swampy

area and is entirely within the Viola Lake Stock; it may reflect a large joint

or fracture. Other weak conductors underlie the swamp in the southeast part of

the property; they may be due to conductive material [clay].

The interpreted northeast and northwest trending faults have been dis

cussed above (section 8.2). It is noteworthy that a zone of shearing found at

L4+50E/2+50S is not reflected by a conductor, but it does lie very close to an

interpreted fault.

10. B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

1O. 1 Soil Types and Vegetation

B horizon soils were chosen as the medium for sampling in 1991 and

1992 because of its success, in the author's experience, in generally sharply

defined anomalies over bedrock mineralization in the Lake of the Woods area.

In the region, there is generally a very thin till mantle, in the order of less

than 1 m to around 2 m deep, lying on bedrock which is often deeply decomposed

when sulphides or shears are present. Thus, buried mineralization can be

detected by either primary (glacial) or secondary (hydromorphic) dispersion of

metals.

- 23 -

The Bear Bay area is ideal for B horizon soil sampling. With the

exception of swamps, it is completely underlain by till. The matrix composition -

with respect to proportions of clay-, silt- and sand-sized components - is highly

variable, from predominantly clay with minor sand and silt fractions, to

predominantly sandy. Colour is equally highly variable, including greyish-

brown, beige, and medium to dark brown. Yellowish, orangey and reddish-brown

matrices are common over and around conductors, reflecting dispersion of iron

as reflected by limonite (after sulphides?) in the oxidized bedrock. Cobbles

and boulders of granitic rocks abound in the till, but many areas contain

mixed, angular, locally derived bedrock fragments; broken subcrop was found

in a number of soil pits at depths of less than 20 cm. Matrix descriptions

are presented on Plan 5.

Over the property, vegetation is consistently mixed bush consisting of

spruce, balsam, poplar, birch and jackpine, with a mostly dense understory of

hazel, alder, young trees and various shrubs - typical of Lake of the Woods.

Over the Viola Lake Stock, the bush is somewhat more open because of large out

crops, and jackpine and black spruce predominate. The large swamp on the

southern property boundary contains mature black ash, and the swamp on L3E to

L4+50E is open and grassy, or alder-covered.

10.2 Statistical Treatment of Results

Frequency distribution diagrams were constructed for copper, lead, zinc,

cobalt, nickel, iron and manganese, using 1991 and 1992 results (Tables 3 to 9,

Figs. 3a to 9a]. Diagrams were not done for silver or molybdenum since very few

values exceed the detection limits (O.5 ppm Ag, 1 ppm Mo], and any value in

excess of the detection limit could be considered anomalous. Best-Fit, Freehand

curves were drawn through Frequency distribution populations in order to divide

anomalous From background levels. For the most part, data do not display normal

distribution. In Fact, several background populations are apparent: three For

copper, zinc and nickel; two For lead and iron. This type oF distribution makes

the selection oF anomalous levels diFFicult. Only manganese and cobalt display

normal, single background populations. The multiple background populations are

likely due to varying bedrock types.

- 24 -

The non-anomalous values were then replotted into cumulative frequency

diagrams (Figs. 3b to 9b), STTi arbitrarily chosen as the lower limit of ther~

'probably anomalous' level, and 50^ as the median (background) value; median

values are probably somewhat meaningless due to multiple background populations.

Statistical data are presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2

B Horizon Soil Geochemistry

Statistical Parameters

1991 and 1992 Samples

Probably Metal Median* Anomalous Anomalous Range

CuPbZnCoNiFeMnAg**Mo**

197

1101220

2 . 37,400

5017?

2503345

4 . 27o1,600

55-

2804055

S.0%1,800

1-442-228-7581-741-120

0.21-+15.0%25-4680

-0.5-1.0*1-2

ppm, unless otherwise indicated not calculated

In 1991, gold contents were determined For B horizon soils on LO to

L3E (Kuehnbaum, 1991); all values were 5 ppb Au, and 1992 samples were not

analyzed.

10.3 Description oF Soil Anomalies

Contoured data For copper and zinc, cobalt and nickel, and lead and

iron are shown on Plans 6,7 and 8, respectively. Except For copper, lowermost

contours were chosen at or close to the 'probably anomalous' levels. Attempts

to contour at lower levels did not result in clearer patterns. Probably anomalous

level contours are shown on the compilation plan (Plan 9). Anomalies discussed

below thereFore incorporate 'probably anomalous' values and above.

- 25 -

Anomaly 1 (Plan 9) is a weak, coincident Pb C18 ppm) - Zn (250 ppm)

zone where conductor V3 crosses LO. To the south is a weak Co (44 ppm) anomaly.

The anomalous Cu-Zn zone overlies an outcrop of the tuffaceous - sedimentary

unit (ts) with minor pyrrhotite; no explanation for Anomaly 1 can be given.

Anomaly 'S. overlies the western end of VLF-EM conductor V1 between LO

and L3E. It consists of partly overlapping and isolated anomalous values of

Cu (up to 80 ppm), Zn (up to 324 ppm), Ni (up to 49 ppm) and Pb (up to 20 ppm).

The soils are also locally Fe-enriched (up to B.47%). The 40 ppm Cu contour shows

the anomaly to be somewhat more continuous (Plan B). The anomaly is probably

related to metal enrichment in the shear expressed by conductor V1.

Anomaly 3 is defined by a broad Zn anomaly (252-785 ppm Zn) between

L4E and L9E. It incorporates smaller zones of enrichment in Cu (51-141 ppm),

Co (up to 32 ppm), Ni (up to 120 ppm), Pb (up to 22 ppm) and Fe. It is interes

ting that the two areas of shearing mapped on L7E and L9E are not associated with

anomalous soils. The anomaly is also interpreted to be due to metal enrichment

in a shear expressed by conductor V1, with zinc showing the broadest dispersion.

The broad Cu-Ni anomaly along the south end could be due to glacial dispersion.

Anomaly 4 is a 2-station Ni anomaly (47 S 88 ppm) overlying and likely

due to a gabbro body (outcrop and magnetic evidence).

Anomaly 5 is a 1-station Cu (50 ppm) and 2-station Zn (272 S 342 ppm)

anomaly situated just south of the pyrrhotite-bearing, oxidized shear(?) on

L3+50E. It may represent glacial dispersion from the zone (anywhere on conductor

V2), although both soil and rock samples from the mineralized zone were not

significantly metal-enriched.

Anomaly B consists of two single-station anomalies with 99 and 144 ppm

Cu, 44 and 74 ppm Co, 57 and 53 ppm Ni, and significant Fe enrichment (up to S.8%),

The samples directly overlie interpreted magnetic bodies, possibly indicating

buried sulphide (pyrrhotite) mineralization similar to the zone at L3+50E.

- 26 -

Respectfully submitted,

Robert M. Kuehnbaum

M.Se., F.G.A.C., Consulting Geologist

November 27, 1992

- 27 -

REFERENCES

Ayer, J.A., Johns, G.W., and Blackburn, C.E., 1991, Archean volcanology andsedimentology of Lake of the Woods - the classic Keewatin greenstone belt: Geological Association of Canada, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Society of Economic Geologists, Joint Annual Meeting, Toronto '91, Field trip BE, Guidebook, 59 p.

Ayer, J.A., MacFie, R.I., and Buck, S., 1988, Precambrian geology of the Chisholm Island area, Lake of the Woods, District of Kenora; Ontario Geological Survey, Map P.3121, Geological Series - Prelim- nary Map, scale 1:15,840, or 1 inch to \ mile.

Fraser, N.H.C., 1945, Geology of the Whitefish Bay area, Lake of the Woods;p. 1-19 in Annual Report for 1943, Vol. 52, pt 4, Ontario Department of Mines. Accompanied by Map 52C, scale 1:53,360, or 1 inch to 1 mile.

Kuehnbaum, R.M., 1990, Report on soil sampling survey and rock geochemistry, Passage gold property, Lake of the Woods, Kenora Mining Division, Ontario, 37 p., in Toronto and Kenora assessment files.

____________, 1991, Report on magnetic and VLF-EM surveys, B horizon soilsampling and geological mapping, Bear Bay claims, Lake of the Woods, Kenora Mining Division, Ontario, NTS: 52E/9SW, in Toronto and Kenora assessment files.

Lambert, A., 1976, Diamond drill logs for drillholes D-1 to D-5, for Hudson Bay Exploration and Development Company Limited, in Toronto and Kenora assessment files.

MacTavish, R.O., 1975, Electromagnetic survey of Group "D", Eagle Project,Kakagi block, Kenora Mining Division, Ontario, for Hudson Bay Explo ration and Development Company Limited, 3 p., with 3 maps, scale 1:4,800 (1 inch to 400 ft), in Toronto and Kenora assessment files.

- 28 -

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Robert Martin Kuehnbeum, of 3101 O'Hagan Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, hereby certify that:

1. I am a graduate of the University of Toronto with B.Se. (1971) and M.Se. C1973) degrees in Geology.

2. I have been continuously practicing my profession since 1974 as an employee of mining firms and, since 1986, as a Consulting Geologist.

3. I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

4. I am the sole registered holder of the claims discussed in this report.

5. This report outlines work carried out by myself and Donald R. Hawke,residing in Mississauga, Ontario, and I was present on the property during all phases of work.

B. This report reviews all available government and company assessment data in the immediate vicinity of the property.

Signed and sealed

This - day of WA , 1992.

at Mississauga, Ontario

i

Robert M. Kuehnbaum, M.Se., F.G.A.C.

- 29 -

APPEJSDIX I

ROCK DESCRIPTIONS

- 30 -

APPENDIX I

Sample No. Type

92-BB-1000R grab,outcrop

10O1R chips of subcrop, soil pit

1002R grab,outcrop

1003R grab,outcrop

-1004R grab,outcrop

-10O5R grab,outcrop

1006R grab,outcrop

-10O7R grab,outcrop

ROCK DESCRIPTIONS

Description

BufF-weathering, grey, very fine-grained. Composed principally of saccharoidal quartz and feldspar. Rock is either siltstone or cherty felsic tuff. Minor Fe oxide pits suggest former sulphides. Fracture surfaces slightly limonite-stained.

Same as 1000R. About 156 very fine-grained, roughly disseminated pyrrhotite.

Massive (not well-laminated] intermediate lapilli tuff. Composed of fine-grained feldspathic material and quartz, amphibole and 5/6 biotite. Vague schistosity. Minor quartz-carbonate veinlets (1-2 mm]. Fracture surfaces reddish-brown, but no sulphides apparent.

Grey (buff-weathering], moderately laminated (cm scale], very fine-grained intermediate to felsic tuff or silt stone. Composed principally of quartz.

Grey, very fine-grained, moderately laminated clastic rock. Composed princippaly of fine, silt-sized quartz and larger (0.2 mm] white feldspar grains. Minor (less than 5/6] biotite imparts slight schistosity. Minor secondary quartz seams (less than 1 mm]. Cleavage and fracture planes limonite-stained. Greywacke or tuff?

Intermediate-composition tuff. Greyish-green, fairly uniform, consisting of dark green amphibole and quartzo- feldspathic material. Faint schistosity. On outcrop, very irregular banding due to mafic content. Some stretched fragments up to 20 cm long. Local randomly oriented pyroxene (or hornblende] porphyroblasts, 3-4 mm in length.

Uniform, poorly laminated, grey clastic rock. Composed of quartz, white feldspar, biotite (5/0 , and minor epidote. Biotite in aggregates, similar to 1OO2R, but somewhat coarser-grained. Wacke? Minor Fe oxides (surface oxidation] throughout.

Green, medium- to coarse-grained. Composed of 4056 dark green amphibole, 60/6 feldspar 4- quartz, minor epidote and calcite. Amphibole/pyroxene in 1-2 mm subidiomorphic, porphyroblastic grains. On outcrop, irregular banding displays some minor folding. Stretched and boudinaged layers and fragments (clasts] of lighter and darker material. Intermediate tuff - tuff breccia.

- 31 -

92-BB-1008R

-1009R

grabs, Massive mafic metavolcanie rock. Grey-green, very fine- subcrop in grained. Amphibole dominant mafic mineral. 1-2X soil pit irregularly distributed aggregates (1-2 mm) very fine-

grained pyrrhotite. No schistosity. Overall weakly magnetic. Weathering surface slightly limonite-stained.

grabs, Highly limonitic, rotted, crumbly material. Well-lamina- subcrop in ted, slightly schistose. Composed principally of buff soil pits quartz and minor sericitef?) with limonitic partings.

Rare clear quartz 'eyes' to + 1 mm. Probable shear.

1010R grab,outcrop

1011R composite grab, rubble

1012R composite grab, rubble

Greywacke or intermediate to felsic tuff? Grey clastic rock. Composed principally of very fine-grained (silt- sized) quartz and minor feldspar with less than 5/6 evenly dispersed biotite (0.1 mm). Minor white mica (sericite?) defines weak schistosity. Moderately laminated.Probable shear, resembles argillaceous siltstone. Rubbly hillslope exposing blocks and fragments of extremely fine-grained, highly siliceous rock. Dark grey, probably graphitic. White laminae, and earthy limonitic laminae to *5mm. Very friable along micaceous? partings. Zone of unknown width, probably 1-3 m.

Same as 1011R, but 5 m to west, graphite?

Dark grey due to

1013R grab, rubble

Same as 10O8R, but appears somewhat tuffaceous, probably due to brecciation(?)7alteration(?) adjacent to shear at 1011 ans 1012R. About 1-256 very fine-grained dissemi nated pyrrhotite. Slightly limonite-stained weathering surface.

1014R grab,outcrop

-1015R grab,outcrop

-1016R chips of subcrop, soil pit

Massive to very slightly schistose, fine-grained mafic metavolcanie flow rock, similar to 1O08R. Trace very Fine-grained disseminated pyrrhotite. Limonite-stained. Non-magnetic.

Intermediate tuffaceous sediment or wacke? Grey, fine grained, predominantly quartzose clastic rock. Minor feldspar and 5/6 biotite. Mica defines moderate schisto sity. Poorly laminated. Rare very fine-grained pyrrho tite. Similar to 1002R.

Sheared tuuaceous/sedimentary unit. Friable fragments of grey, siliceous rock similar to adjacent clastic rocks. Chloritic. No evidence of sulphides, but rock is heavily and pervasively limonitic stained.

- 32 -

grab, sub- Massive Fine-grained mafic metavolcanic Flow rock, crop rubble similar to 1008R. 1X very Fine-grained disseminated on slope pyrrhotite. Moderately magnetic

92-BB-1017R

-1018R " " Same as 1017R, but contains minor (2X) very Fine-grainedbiotite. 1X very Fine-grained disseminated pyrrhotite and pyrite. Locally more abundant and coarser-grained pyyrhotite (0.2 mm) in epidote segregations. Very weakly magnetic.

mineralized zone, probable shear. Not well exposed zone, approximately 2 m wide. Loose, slumped, intensely limo- nite-stained and Friable. Grey to greenish-grey, siliceous (cherty), with minor micaceous (chlorite and sericite?) laminae; white mica locally coarse (several mm). Minor reddish seamsXlaminae. Rock is either sheared and silici- Fied maFic metavolcanic rock or sedimentary/exhalative unit. 4% very Fine-grained pyrrhotite irregularly distri buted throughout, especially coarse-grained on micaceous partings. Possible minor pyrite and chalcopyrite (not conFirmable). Note: diFFicult to observe Fresh surFaces due to Friability and oxidation.

Samples 92-BB-001R to -003R are located just east oF the eastern property boundary on the shore oF Adams River Bay.

1019R large com posite grab, sub crop rubble on slope

32-BBP-001R grab, Intermediate tuFF. UniForm, poorly laminated. Medium outcrop to pale greyish-green. Very Fine-grained. Abundant

epidote. Greyish streaks due to stretched Fragments about 20 cm long. Smaller, more Felsic Fragments evident on weathered surFace. About 2/S pyroxene (or hornblende) porphyroblasts evenly distributed throughout. Very weak Fabric.

-DOER grab,outcrop

-OO3R grab,outcrop

Similar to -001R, but medium-green, and black porphyroblasts much smaller (1 mm), less common and appear to be incor porated into Fabric. TuFFaceous texture not clear. 3/6 very Fine- to Fine-grained evenly distributed aggregates oF pyrrhotite.

Same zone as -OO2R. Limonite stained intermediate tuFF as -OO1R. TuFFaceous texture (2-3 cm long dark fragments)

highly evident, and well-developed schistosity. No sulphides, non-magnetic.

- 33 -

APPENDIX II

ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES

HOCK SAfFLES

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists' Geochemlsts' Registered Assayers5175 Timbertea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

10: KUtHNBAUM, MR. ROBERT

3101 O'HAGANDR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY

PageNumber :1 Total Pages :1 CwtMcate Date: 06-OCT-92 InvoteeNo. .19221831 P.O. Number : Account :EDL

SAMPLE

92BB 1000RJ2BB 1002RJ2BB 1003R)2BB 1005R92BB 1006R

92BB 1007R92BB 1008R)2BB 1009RJ2BB 1011R92BB 1013R

HBB 1014R)2BB 1015R)2BB 1018R92BB 1019R

i

PRCO

299299299299299

299299299299299

299299299299

EPm

200200200200200

200200200200200

200200200200

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221 831

A1203 CaO Cr203 F*203 K20 NgO MnO Na20 P205 8i02 Ti02 LOI TOTAL Ba Mb Ib 8r T Ir****SS*****\\* ppi PPI ppi PPI PPI ppi

14.51 3.54 0.03 3.78 2.22 1.31 0.05 2.82 0.16 69.32 0.42 1.90 100.05 320 < 10 55 2*0 10 10016.85 7.58 0.04 11.95 0.47 3.69 0.13 3.56 0.21 51.84 1.44 2.21 99.97 120 K 10 < 5 430 30 9013.28 1.76 0.07 2.14 2.20 0.84 0.03 4.14 0.15 75.34 0.31 0.87 101.15 480 < 10 2* 300 10 11015.91 13.81 0.07 9.20 2.63 4.56 0.20 1.03 0.23 52.00 0.88 1.38 101.90 370 < 10 65 590 20 7015.77 5.51 0.06 6.52 2.52 4.79 0.10 5.15 0.48 56.20 0.86 1.36 99.32 1580 < 10 44 1500 20 ICO

13.73 16.26 0.09 11.89 1.17 5.75 0.27 1.42 0.16 47.22 0.77 1.91 100.65 290 < 10 11 450 20 7013.59 10.13 0.06 9.64 0.62 8.86 0.20 2.78 0.58 48.22 1.00 1.66 97.34 904-\ < 10 < 5 950 30 ICO15.57 1.88 0.03 9.01 2.83 4.20 0.06 1.30 0.32 58.76 0.62 6.80 101.40 760 < 10 65 350 10 11015.19 3.20 0.04 5.59 1.51 1.25 0.06 4.01 0.25 65.79 0.45 3.93 101.25 330 < 10 32 450 10 11015.20 6.83 0.04 7.60 0.22 4.64 0.18 4.36 0.17 56.00 1.24 1.55 98.03 120- -t 10 < 5 190 30 90

15.03 10.87 0.04 9.47 0.09 5.76 0.25 1.37 0.15 53.25 1.20 1.10 98.58 70 ~ 4 10 < 5 110 SO 9018.15 6.71 0.01 14.48 0.50 4.59 0.22 3.60 0.21 49.36 1.50 0.14 99.47 190 * 10 < 3 SCO SO 9017.52 7.93 0.05 6.26 0.85 3.97 0.17 3.69 0.17 56.72 1.16 1.55 100.05 350- * 10 17 150 20 109.45 8.08 < 0.01 13.80 < 0.01 7.69 0.53 1.13 0.14 51.11 0.45 6.20 98.60 30 < 10 < 5 70 30 70

CERTIFICATION:.

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists ' Qeochemlsts ' Registered Assayers

5175 Timberlea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To:

3101 O'HAGANDR. MISSISSAUQA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY

Total Pages :1 Certificate Date: 3O-SEP-92 Invoice No. : 19221830 P.O. Number : Account :EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221830

SAMPLE

92BB 1OOOR 93mm 1001R 92BB 1OO2R 92BB 1003R 92BB 1O04R

92BB 1O05R 92BB 1OO6R 92BB 1007R 92BB 1OO8R 92BB 1O09R

92BB 1O1OR 92BB 1011R 92BB 1012R 92BB 1O13R 92BB 1014R

92BB 1015R 92BB 1016R 92BB 1017R 92BB 1018R 92BB 1019R

PREP CODE

205 2O5 205 205 205

205 2O5 2O5 2O5 205

205 205 205 205 2O5

205 205 205 205 2O5

226 226 226 226 226

226 226 226 226226

226 226 226 226 226

226 226 226 226 226

Au ppb PA+AA

4 5 c 5760< S < S

< 5 < 5< 5 < 5 < 5

< 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5

< 5 < 5 15

< 5 < 5

Ag ppm

< 0.5 < 0.5 c 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

< 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 c 0.5 < O. S

< 0.5 < 0.5 < O. 5 < 0.5 * 0.5

* 0.5 * 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Co ppm

8107 3

1O

8 199

304

93 1

18 1O

16 2

19 30 8

Cu ppa

65 90 58 20 60

115 46 63 76 40

36 95 29

103 16

16 116 33 77 52

F*

2.13 2.69 4.63 1.46 3.08

1.20 2.45 1.69 2.76 5.58

1.69 3.78 1.97 2.02 1.18

3.41 13.50 6.52 2.29 6.35

Mn ppa

270 275 290 265 230

275 3O5 455 2O5 275

180 315 85

150 225

375 265 865 380 445

Moppa

i3

< 1< 1 t 1 < 1< 1

< 1 < 1* 1

* 1

< 1 < i< 1

C 1

Mi PP*

55 149 8 9

17 79 26

1OO9

338 7

27 15

1O 7

36 50 25

PbPP*

2a2 2

< 2

< 2 1O

< 2a

14

< 28 6

< 2 < 2

4 144

< 22

Zn PP*

86no54 74 6O

2O 52 26 72 SO

26 5O 18 30 32

56 96

108 54 92

CERTIFICATION: \T^-^ C? l WN...

ill

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists * Geochetnists * Registered Assayers 212 Brooksbank Ave., North Vancouver British Columbia, Canada V7J 2C1 PHONE: 604-984-0221

To: r\ucHNBauM. MR. hUBtRT

3101 O'HAGANDR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY REGIONAL

Page Number :1 Total Pages : 1 Certificate Date: 30-SEP-92 Invoice No. : 19221829 P.O. Number : Account :EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221 829

SAMPLJPWQPcom

A1203 CaO Cr203 Fe203 * \ * V

X20 MffO MnO Na20 P205 Si02 Ti02 \ X

LOI TOTAL 0 X

Kbpp. pp.

Sr pp.

92BBF.002 92BBF.003

299299299

200200200

13.63 13.9913.44 17.2713.93 12.82

0.090.050.09

9.0114.468.64

1.551.031.41

3.383.494.49

0.1S 0.21 0.15

2.221.252.29

0.160.120.18

52.8345.2350.68

0.700.670.71

1.871.642.78

99.CI 98.8698.17

530 10190 < 10330 < 10

38 39027 43027 540

101010

7070

800

LJ 01

CERTIFICATION:

Chemex Labs Ltd.Analytical Chemists * Geochemists * Registered Assayers

5175 Timberiea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: .._HNB/.-..., .^R. R ^.t

3101 O'HAGAN DR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY REGIONAL

' C*9O Ml* l tUOI I 1

Total Pages :1 Certificate Date: 30-SEP-92 Invoice No. : 19221828 P.O. Number : Account : EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221 828

SAMPLE

92BBP.OO192BBP.OO293BBP.OO3

\

PREP CODE

2O52OS205

226226226

Au ppb FA+AA

< 5< 5< 5

Ag ppm

< O. 5< O. 5< O. 5

Co ppm

93516

Cu ppm

41198

SO

Fa*

1.582.372.25

MaPPB

43O170320

MoPPB

< 11

< 1

Hi PP*

39128

82

PbPPB

642

Zn PP*

42224O

uiNl

CERTIFICATION:

- 38 -

APPENDIX III

ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES

B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLES

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists ' Geochemlsta ' Registered Assayers

5175 Timbertea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: KUEHNBAUM, MR. ROBERT

3101 O'HAGAN DR MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C 2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY

Page Number : 1 Total Pages :3 Certificate Date: 28-SEP-02 Invoice No. : 19221826 P.O. Number : Account : EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221826

SAMPLE

02-BB-Ol92-BB-0292-BB-0392-BB-0492-BB-05

92-BB-0692-BB-0792-BB-0892-BB-0992-BB-10

92-BB-ll92-BB-12i92-BB-13'92-BB-1492-BB-15

92-BB-1692-BB-1792-BB-1892-BB-1992-BB-20

92-BB-2192-BB-2292-BB-2392-BB-2492-BB-25

92-BB-2692-BB-2792-BB-2892-BB-2992-BB-30

92-BB-3192-BB-3292-BB-3392-BB-3492-BB-35

92-BB-3692-BB-3792-BB-3892-BB-3992-BB-40

PREPCODE

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

*gppm

< O . 5< O . 3< 0.5< 0 . 5< O .5

< 0 .5< O . 5< 0 . 5< 0 .5< 0 .5

< 0 .5< 0 .5 C O .5< 0 .5< 0 .5

< 0 .5< 0 .5< 0 .5< 0.5< 0.5

< O .5< O .5< 0.5< 0 .5< 0 .5

< 0.5< 0 .5< O . 5< 0.5< O .5

< 0.5< 0.5

0.51 . 0

< 0 .5

< 0 .5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0 .5

Coppm

109

131213

189

14126

241627449

79

182717

2619172214

101515114

109

192522

1924201915

Cuppm

1111192522

302623119

1417499912

610322721

3077674926

28361994

2720

14112416

1517192332

Fe*

1 . Bl2 . 082.222.272 .37

2.712. 743 . 532 . 801.31

3. 012.023.724. 961.33

1. 871 .763 . 162.502.29

3.003.223. 652 .222 . 95

3. 953 . 572.441. 650. 93

2.001.132.192.342 .29

2 .072 . 402 .342.442. 98

Mnppm

20513549O23093O

249020O475475290

265500875590500

285215765595630

226O460

11651665475

19035579O52O115

3252701215685

3170

141025101245495320

MOppm

< l< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< i< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1111

< 1

1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1

1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

Nippm

1216202419

2918151410

3117295713

1114304530

3933332530

124742199

2627

1208729

2128243039

Pbppm

c6848

104666

106

1246

68

128a

121618166

66644

1068

148

814886

ZnPP*

549*

138158146

3281522389432

13090

19619854

58IK222228196

328356402182156

1721241146216

4452

32245O758

440512482320104

\r^uAryiCERTIFICATION: Vr^"* O/ l'f Av

U)tfl

Chernex Labs Ltd,Analytical Chemists ' Geochemisis ' Registered Assayers 5175 Timberlea Blvd.. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: KUEHNBAUM, MR ROBERT

3101 O'HAGAN DR MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY

Page Number :2 Total Pages :3 Certificate Dale: 2frSEP-92 Invoice No. : 19221826 P.O. Number : Account : EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221 826

SAMPLE

92-BB-4192-BB-4292-BB-4392-BB-4492-BB-45

92-BB-4692-BB-4792-BB-4892-BB-4992-BB-50

92-BB-5192-BB-5292-BB-5392-BB-5492-BB-55

92-BB-5692-BB-5792-BB-5892-BB-5992-BB-60

92-BB-6192-BB-6292-BB-6392-BB-6492-BB-65

92-BB-6692-BB-6792-BB-6B92-BB-6992-BB-70

92-BB-7192-BB-7292-BB-7392-BB-7492-BB-75

92-BB-7692-BB-7792-BB-7892-BB-7992-BB-80

PREPCODE

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

201201201201201

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229229229229

Agppm

< 0 .5< O .5< 0 .5< 0.5 C 0 .5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0 .5< 0 .5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0 .5< 0.5< O .5< O .5

< 0 .5< 0.5< 0.5< 0 .5K 0.5

< 0 .5< 0.5* 0 .5< 0.5K 0.5

< 0 . 5< 0. 5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5 C 0.5< 0.5

< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5

COppm

201944

22

1411301415

177

161432

2O1922222

33533173

131526139

1332171428

97

103274

Cuppm

1651293

22

2836482946

324

161440

463137442

452493451

5462702835

2272251830

198

2548

144

Fe%

3.072.950. 981.002.58

3.456.763. 933.312.75

3.561.542.262.122.71

3. 473. 984. 102.890.69

0.773.713.545.486.13

5.O53.182.101.372.35

2.933.403.192.333.15

1.781.672.155. 8O4.48

Mnppm

59520565

2402840

325390

3450495815

1315110890670

4550

119511OO106078090

10046803330740275

85O660

160573O205

5451935880305

1165

240175155330415

Moppm

< i< i< i< l< l

< i< l< i< i< l

< l< i< l< l< i

< i< i< i< i< l

< l< l< l

21

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

Mippm

3088137

33

3128212426

2712242325

453351773

64150219

1832442112

2239272034

1612173559

Pbppm

8286

12

121412106

86

126

14

6121082

6868

14

2210148

10

8141268

8S

12128

Znppm

128682224316

222140324234330

17264

36036235O

24O242148828

18166298182110

3382625662

114

178302190206256

1045464

122170

i r.PRTIFICATION fl^^^ CL/ /l

-r.

1*K

Chemex Labs Ltd.Analytical Chemists * Geocbemists ' Registered Assayers

5175 Timbertea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

To: KUEHNBAUM, MR. ROBERT

3101 O'HAGAN DR. MISSISSAUGA, ON L5C2C4

Project: Comments:

BEAR BAY

Page Number :3 Total Pages :3 Certificate Date: 28-SEP-92 Invoice Ho. : 19221826 P.O. Number : Account :EDL

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9221826

SAMPLE

92-BB-8192-BB-8292-BB-8392-BB-8492-BB-85

92-BB-8692-BB-8792-BB-8892-BB-8992-BB-90

02-BB-9102-BB-B2

PREPCODE

2012O12O1201201

201201201201201

2O1201

229229229229229

229229229229229

229229

Agppm

^ 0 5< 0 5< 0 5 * 0 5 COS

< 0 5< 0 5< 0 B< 0 5< 0 S

< 0 5< 0 S

Coppm

91114127

142

1O< 113

2528

Cuppm

292111176

293

384210

5038

Feft

1 912 672 282 281 62

1 620 602 93

:*15 002 48

4 203 33

Mnppm

215295835505295

33540

140115460

14753940

MOppm

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 11

Hippm

202216181O

193

141

17

2224

Pbppm

4a

10126

626

166

1016

ZnPT*

4817412816456

646

3648

158

342272

^*

CERTIFICATION:.

- 42 -

APPENDIX IV

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

STATISTICAL DATA

AND

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAMS

- 43 -

Table 3. Copper in B horizon soils, percent Frequency.

Frequency distribution and cumulative

Interval (ppm)Frequency

1991 1992 TotalBackground Fopulation(s)

Cum. Frog. Cum. X

0-56-1011-1516-2021-25

26-3031-3536-4041-4546-5051-55

56-6061-6566-7071-7576-8081-85+S5

Total Cn)

118614

225--

-1-1--

41

69101210

1256274

-.

1211-4

92

1717161314

1278774

1312-4

133

1734506377

8996104111118122

13.927.941.051.663.1

73.078.785.291.096.7100.0

Table 4. Zinc in B horizon soils, percent frequency.

Frequency distribution and cumulative

Interval (ppm)

0-2021-4041-6061-8O81-100101-120

121-140 141-160 161-180 181-200 201-220

221-24O 241-260 261-280 281-300 301-320 321-340 +340

Total (n)

Frequency 1991 1992 Total

3258

52

52111

22-

1-

1~

459B4B

76761

B221

36

11

77

1414

98

128a72

842237

11

Background Population(s) Cum. Freq. Cum. '/o

71428425159

7179879496

104108110

6.412.725.538. Z46.453.6

64.571.879.185.587.3

94.598.2100.0

41 133

- 44 -

20

16

L U.

*^,

F

\

•lg

\p

iur

r

s Z3a

l\/ ,\l \

S*

anomi55 f

v^

\\

100 -j

alous rfi 8O -

Dpm -j- UCopper L. yja**xst t 60 -n ^ 133 u

"H 4Q .p ^U

(Di-H

f 520 "u

1 — — *?

Figure

sny./

f7f/'

/

3bCT70/ ,M.,,,,.J/A ^^

jSx'

,/prob.

50 Ranompm

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 +8S

Interval Cppm)

Figure 4a Zinc

anomalous 28O ppm

40 80 120 160 200 240 28O 320

Interval (ppm)

340

10 20 30 40 50

Cumulative interval Cppm)

Figure 4b

^lULJ, 0C0)Er 80Q)L

U-v SO

• i-H

ID 4Qt—H

| 2O-u

n~7o'J / /o ^

/^

X'x'.X

7507o /'

.1.x'

xX vx'

x

-t—"'

prob anom25O ppm

0

40 80 120 1BO 20O 240

Cumulative interval (ppm)

Figure 3. Copper in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution (a) and cumulative percent frequency (b).

Figure 4. Zinc in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution (a) and cumulative percent frequency

- 45 -

Table 5. Cobalt in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution and percent cumulative Frequency.

Interval CppnQ

Frequency Background Populations)

1991 1992 Total Cum. Freq. Cum. %

0-5S- 1011-1516-2021 -35

26-3031-3536-4041-4546-50+50

Total (n)

Table G. Nickel incumulative

914543

3-111-

41

B horizonfrequency

81825189

75-1-1

92

soils.-

1732302212

1051211

133

Frequency

Frequency

Interval Cppm)

0-56-1011-1516-2021-25

26-3031-3536-4041-4546-5O51-55

56-60+7S

1991

513285

22211-

_

1992

36121515

14103521

24

Total

819142320

1G125631

24

174979101113

123128129

13.238.061.278.387.6

95.399.2100.0

distribution and percent

Background

Cum . Freq

827416484

100112117123126127

Population(s)

Cum. 0/,

6.321.332.350.466.1

78.788.292.196.999.2100.0

Total (n) 41 92 133

- 47 -

Table 7. Lead in B horizon soils, cumulative frequency.

Frequency distribution and percent

Frequency

Interval Cppm)

0-23-45-67-89-1011-12

13-1415-1617-1819-2021-22

Total (n)

Table 8. Iron in Bcumulative

Interval W

0-0.500.51-1.001.01-1 .501.51-2.002.01-2.5O2.51-3.OO

3.01-3.503. 51-4. OD4.O1-4.5O4.51-5.005.O1-5.5O5.51-6.00+6.00

1991

33

11256

4322-

41

1992

36

2623912

741 1

92

Total

69

37251418

117321

133

horizon soils. FrequencyFrequency

1931

349744

.44-2-

-

Frequency

1992

54

112514

121031^13

Total

31O13182918

121471413

Background Population(s)

Cum. Freq. Cum. V,

615527791109

120127130132133

distribution

Background

Cum. Freq

31326447391

103117124125

4.511.339.157.968.482.0

90.295.597.799.2100.0

and percent

Population(s)

Cum. '/o

2.410.420.835.258.472.8

82.493.699.21OO.O

Total [n] 41 92 133

- 48 -

40 T

30-

0)

10 -

30-

20-

u03Lu.

Figure 7a

Lead

n=133

no anomalous values

4 8 12 16 20

Interval (ppm)

figure 8a

Iron

1.0 ?.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 +6.0

Interval (7o)

Figure To

100-1

l 80 -0) it 60-fl)

p 40-(Ci-H

i 20-

97* . . -/^

5O%X

js"'

/'17

7

anom.ppm

100 -iu ucr m j. u.

E CJ

80 '

60 -

40 -

4 8 12 16 20

Cumulative Interval (ppm)

Figure 8b

977o______

prob. anom.

1.O 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

Cumulative Interval

Figure 7. Lead in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution (a) and percent cumulative Frequency Cb).

Figure 8. Iron in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution fa) and percent cumulative Frequency (b).

- 49 -

Table g. Manganese in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution and percent cumulative frequency.

Frequency Background PopulationCe) Interval (ppm) 1991 1995 Total Cum. Freq. Cum. X

0-200.201-4004O1-60O601-800801-10OO

1112 G22

13231797

243523119

24538293102

20.049.268.377.585.0

1001-1200 1201-1400 1401-160O 1601-1800 1801-2OOO +2000

1121

5323

10

6444

13

108112116120

90.093.396.7100.0

Total (n) 41 92 133

- 50 -

Figure 9a

anomalous 1800 ppm

400 800 1SOO 16OO

Interval (ppm).

+5000

Figure 9b

od)

0)

IJ-B)>

•Hjp(0p— t

1

100, 97X ^..

80-

60-

40-

^o-

^•-^ "X

X

/ prob . anom 1600 ppm

/l1

400

400 800 12OO 1SOO

Cumulative interval (ppm)

Figure 9. Manganese in B horizon soils. Frequency distribution (a) and percent cumulative Frequency (b).

- 51 -

APPENDIX V

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

- 52 -

APPENDIX V

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

All samples were submitted to Chemex Lsbs Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario and Vancouver, B.C., for geochemical analysis (rocks and soils] and whole- rock geochemical analysis (rocks) using the following procedures.

SOIL SAMPLE PREPARATION

Drying and sieving to -80 mesh

ROCK SAMPLE PREPARATION

Sample crushed, split and RING ground to approximately -15O mesh.

ANALYTICAL

1. GOld (Rocks], 10 grams of sample fused in litharge, carbonate and siliceous flux to produce a button containing precious metals. Button cupelled in muffle furnace to produce a precious metals bead which is dissolved in nitric acid - aqua regia. Measurement by atomic absorption analysis. Detection limit 5 ppb.

2. Silver, Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Lead and Zinc. \ gram sample dissolved in nitric acid - aqua regia, and analyzed by induced coupled plasma (ICP] methods. Detection limits: 0.5 ppm Ag; 1 ppm Co, Cu, Mo, and Ni; 5 ppm Mn and Pb; D.01% Fe.

3. Whole Rock Oxides, Loss on Ignition (LOI), and Barium, Niobium,Strontium, Yttrium and Zirconium (Rocks). 0.10 gm sample added to lithium metaborate flux, and fused to 1050 C. Resultant bead cooled and dissolved in 100 mL of 4/i nitric acid. Major rock components [oxides], Ba, Mb, Sr, Y and Zr determined by ICP analysis, corrected for inter-element interference. Detection limits: D.01% for whole rock oxides; 1O ppm Ba, Nb, Sr, Y and Zr .

Rb determined by atomic absorption analysis using same solution as For whole rock analysis. Detection limit 5 ppm.

LOI determined by adding 1 gm sample to previously heated (660 C), cooled and weighed porcellain crucible. Sample and crucible heated to 660 C for 1 hr, cooled and weighed. LOI determined by weight loss, detection limit D.01%.

- 53 -

APPENDIX VI

LOG OF DRILLHOLE D-5

HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED

(LAMBERT, 1376)

- "5-3 -

HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED

DIAMOND DRILL LOG

PROPERTY: EAGLE

CLAIM NO. K-^46/

HOLE NO. D-5 ANGLE: -50"

DEPTH: 104' GRID NO. D

DATE STARTED: July 13, 1976

DRILLED BY: Northwest Geophysics

LOCATION: Kakagi Uloch (

DIRECTION: 360" (north)

CO-ORDINATES: 39 * 00 E4.-J05 n

DATE FINISHED: July 14, 1976

LOGGED BY: - A. Lambert

DEPTH

From

0.0

8.0

104.0

To

8.0

104.0

DESCRIPTION OF CORE

Overburden

Andesite - fine grained, dark green, occasional quartz:carbonates. Mineralized sections throughout.

9.0' 1/2" near solid pyrrhotite and pyrite:11.0-12.5 narrow bands pyrrhotite and pyrite22.5' 2" band pyrrhotite find pyrite

(0463) 24.5-29.5 25-30i pyrrhotite, minor pyrite(8-164) 29.5-33.5 5-101; pyrrhotite, minor pyrite, tr sphaleri t e(0455) 35.5-36.0 semi-massive pyrrhotite, trace chalcopyrite(8466) 36.0-41.0 15-20"i pyrrhotite, minor pyrite, tr chalcopyrite(8457) Ml. 0-46.0 15-20"* pyrrhotite, minor pyrite(0468) 46.0-47.5 5-103 pyrrhotite, minor pyrite(8'1G9) 47.5-49.0 5-10^ pyrrhotite, ninor pyrite, trace chalcopyrite(0470) 53. 5-5-*-. 5 3-5^ pyrrhotite, minor pyrite, trace chalcopyrite(3471) 51.5-56.5 3-5^ pyrrhotite, minor pyrite, trace chalcopyrite

(4" quartz vein at 54.5)(8472) 56.5-53.0 10-15; pyrrhotite, minor pyrite, trace chalcopyrite

59.0-6U.O very slight mineralization (60. 5' 2" massivepyrrhotite -and pyrite)

(8473) 68.0-69.0 Slight pyrrhotite and pyrite 1^. iiphalerite(0474) 69.0-70.0 Seni nassivo pyrrhotite

70.0-72.0 Slic/ht minernlization(3475) 72.0-73.0 Well mineralised pyrrliotite, 1^ chalcopyrite(8476) 73.0-75.5 10-15^ pyrrhotite, trace clialcopyrite and sph.^.lerit

75. 5-01. f. barren (biotitic)(8477) 81.5-Hb.O -.-/oil mineralised pyrrhotite, trace chalcopyrite,

and sphalerite(047fl) 85.0-8-J.5 Slightly mineralised pyrrhotite, 1"^ chalcopyrite

(1/G" r. triiigsrP-5.5-8G.5 Ikirren

(8479) 85.5-87.0 v;sll mineralised pyrrhotite103.5 1/2" mas:;ive jiyrrhotite

END OF IlOLi: (core anql^40-45" )

- 55 -

APPENDIX VII

WHOLE ROCK AND TRACE ELEMENT GEOCHEMISTRY

OF ROCK SAMPLES BY LITHOLOGIC UNIT

- 56 -

TABLE 10

Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry of

MAFIC METVOLCANIC FLOW FKDCKS

Sample No.*

SiO^SOTiOjA1 2O3Cr^O-gFe203MnOMgOCaONa^OKpOP205LOITotal

BaCppm)NbRbSrYZr

AgCoCuMnMoNiPbZnFe(7o]Au(opb)

1006

48.221.00

13.590.069.640.208.86

10.132.780.620.581.66

97.34

90*10< 595O

30160

•eO.53076

205*1

1008

722.76

*5

1013

56.001.24

15.200.047.600.184.646.834.360.220. 171.55

98.03

120•CIO•*51903090

40.518

1O3150

•ci27^30

2.024. 5

1014

53.251.20

15.030.049.470.255.76

10.871.37O.O90.151.10

98.58

70*MO< 51103090

*0.51016

225•el15*232

1 . 18-C5

1018

56.721.16

17.52O.O56.260.173.977.933.690.850.171.55

100.05

350•c10

1715O20SO

*0.53077

380•ftl50^54

2.29^

101;

*0.51933

865.d36

4108

6.5215

All samples are 92-BB series, 1992

TABLE 11

Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples of the

TUFFACEOUS - SEDIMENTARY UNIT

Samp le No .

siOpfx)TiOpAl-jO-,Cr-,0-0Fe203 MnOMgOCaONa20

Pi05 LOITotal

Ba(ppm)NbRbSrYZr

AgCoCuMnMoNiPbZnFeC/S)

1000

69.320.4214.510.033.78 0.051.313.542.82 2.220.16 1.90

100.05

320*-1Q5528010

100

*0.5a

65270•C1552

862.13

1003

75.340.3113.280.072.14 0.030.841.764.14 2.200.15 0.87

101.15

480*.102830010

110

*0.53

20265

1a2

741 .46

pp10O6

56.200.8615.770.066.52 0.104.795.515.15 2.520.48 1.36

99.32

1580•CIO44

150020160

< 0.51946

305^1791052

2.45

-BB samples ———— —————— ————— ——— — 1015 * 1001 1004 1010 10OO

49.361.50

18.150.0114.48 0.224.596.713.60 0.500.21 0. 14

99.47

190*-10

53603090

.CO. 5 ^.5 -f-O.S -cO.5 *:0.516 10 10 9 916 50 60 36 79

375 275 230 180 665< /\ O 3 ^1 ^110 14 9 33 114 2 ^2 *-2 4

56 110 60 26 783.41 2 . 69 3 . 08 1 . 69 4 . 78

— 91-88 samples —————1012 1013 1014

^0.5 ^.5 *;0.517 31 1270 139 63180 46O 340-ci *:1 -O7 34 45846

56 34 1063.96 4.88 2.40

01Nj

Au(ppb)

Whole rock analysis of 92-BB-1015 is suspect. Nothing in the sample indicatesa high Fe content (Appendix I). Sample 92-BB-1016 has abundant limoniteand high Fe'/o (digestion - ICP analysis). Thus, analysis above possibly oF 1O16.

- 58 -

TAELE 12

Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples of

INTERMEDIATE TUFF AND TUFF-BRECCIA

Sample No.—— 92-BB samples — 1002 1005 1007

— 92-BBP samples— 001 002 003

siqgCx)TiO^A1203Cr203Fe203 MnOMgOCaONaEOK20PjOc;LOI

BaCpprn)NbRbSrYZr

AgCoCuMnMoNiPbZnFe(?0Au(ppb)

51.841.44

16.850.0411.95 0.133.697.583.560.470.212.21

99.97

12O<^0< 54303090

-CO. 57

58290< /\

92

544.63760

52.000.8815.910.079.20 0.204.5613.811.032.630.231.38

101.90

370<^065

5902070

•eO.B8

115275<^17•^220

1.20•*:5

47.220.7713.730.0911.89 0.275.7516.261.421.170.161.91

100.65

290<^011

450207O

•eO.59

63455•ci26*;226

1.69*5

52.830.7013.630.099.01 0.183.3813.992.221.550.161.87

99.61

5301038

3901070

^0.59

41430•^1396

421.58^5

45.230.6713.440.0514.46 0.213.4917.271.251.030.121.64

98.86

19O•C1027

430107O

-iO.535198170

11284

222.37< 5

50.680.7113.930.098.64 0.154.4912.822.291.410.182.78

98. 17

33O•MO27

54010

8OO

^.51550

320-ci822

402.25*5

92-BBP- samples are from Adams River Bay immediately east of the property.

- 59 -

TABLE 13

Whole Rock and Trace Element Geochemistry, Samples of

SHEAR ZONES

Sample No.

SiOgCX)Tio2Al^O-g

Cr^OgFSpO-g

MnOMgOCaONa20K20P205LOITotal

Ba(ppm)MbRbSrYZr

AgCoCuMnMoNiPbZnFeC50AuCppb)

1009

58.760.6215.570.039.010.064.201.881.302.830.326.80

101.40

760•^065

35010

11O

*0.54

40275•*19

1450

5.58<'5

— — — Se-

1011

65.790.4515.190.045.590.061.253.204.011.510.253.93

101.25

330•c1032

45010

110

*0.53

95315

•*188

503.78^

- BS" samp 11019

51.110.459.45

^.0113.800.537.698.081.13

•*:0.010.146.20

98.60

30•*10* 5703070

*0.58

52445<^252

926.35*5

91-BBsample

1012 1016 1001

*Q.Ei -*:0.5 <0.51 2 4

29 116 4685 265 220•li -*1 17 7 206 14 a18 96 44

1.97 13.50 2.98*5 *5 <5

(

Wiie

y Ba

y (G

X -

*

"-N

*—

——

?^~

i .-.

.J f

-*

p. —

.-i

i'ULr

t '

— —

— -

JV-T

-I+

-

-t-

—i—

—

-

l g

^ I

s -^ r

~, - ---

T -^ -

"

/-. j

j

^ i

i —

.

4 -

* * i

. x

INDI

AN R

ESER

VE

K V

J4

lo.-

32

8

C

MAC

QUA

RRIE

TW

RFO

R S

TATU

S

RE

FER

TO

r

AN M

2074

VR

STA

TUS

R

EFER

TO

TW

P JL

AN

M

r fc :

V

1

J

-D S

?L

ro*

' S

2V

* "

s*

05 L

i*

JB

J

en r

-

"

3D .0. - *:MKG RIGHTS ONLY O. - SURFACE RIGHTS C'i.. Y

S. - Mfc.feJ . NO

SLRFACt

RICHJMV

h*.

DM*

C

•MMM*

:

MAY

31/65

SbMR

MRO

REVEST TO

CROWN

STAl

JUNE

M55

6*)O

LOGAtr-TtME

y ^ s

d*

*l

> .1

r. i 5 WITHDRAWN

FROT/.

0

SPO*

O 3 t/)

3-

O Z— u D

O. I ': 0-

* t c 1 ( i ' t ( i ( t t . 'P r

l> : j i n i n ( n •4 j ,r f i i

O 3i

t/. Q iLj

'

m M

"t

1 J*

'

1 l

^

1

*

1

1 '

1

0

i5 1CD oundor

y

3 "D H

T t X

l * r i. k

0

^

o f s -•l ^

— o

^*-

**

0

0"*

w

C

Q

S

H

r^

y

l w

S.

^M

^ O

H

,f.

r i

^

*; /ithdrown

-n

o 3 in

K UJ

^

i)

W

; i '

't '

' '''

'

1

TJ T3

(t i

O i

r- i

ajO

(C

(D

5*

" O

(0

"

3

5

~ S

S"D

li

— 1

-n

rovincic -zr- Shown

Thjs

f 3-

l~

J

*

?

0

^

*

Q.

g

0 J'

ja 3

71 5-1

4V

O

^o

CD

o^

r- r,

- o

f 0

0

-*1""

C/i

0)

c-U

l -,

cjo c

T oX

) 'T

1

'D 1

'C 1

in

t (fi

J ?

si,

.0

1 ^

TD m ~n

m m "Z. o rn

c,

j V

/,-

^ ID

^^

^^

i^

^3

^^

™**

""^ ^

^ ™

^^ ™

^ ^^

r^

*D

^^ ^

5f^

*^

^^

^*

JQ

^^

^^

^^

"p

^

^!i

^~

^^

*^^

^^

^^

^n

10

W r

^

2J ft

mto

C)t')

fT1

CO

HH

0

r~

i

rn33

rnc'(-rno

i ctr

i>

>

lw0

*

co

>t/'

- t"

,"*

O

-j

O

i.)

-^

. —

i :?

! i-"

si 5

^ CD

n

m^2

Z O

~

il J.

cr

, p

J S

g :-

r.

V O

'os^^-iJzIi^^

711

*'^

**"*

"' l

*

-'

,'

^

^ " Z

5

>

rn

^ Z

'•; -;

-" "'

" '

^ O

m 5

O z

9 i

"i - '

- -I

- -"

m

> C

z S

I .

: ,;

5 1

S ^

55 c

1 K

z

r* ji^

lSo^S

ll

0

.**

1""

^ r n

*^ii

^^l

L-V

-v;?

f:P

P(^^^^

a H.

t ; *

•. •"•

- v

- - :-

.'••-

..-

. '

- -'

v. •'

••- -'

- ••-

; '

' '•

••' .--

..-y-

.--.'

•:^.;T

;.?;:JX

-

- - ':

* -

-: .

•'••'•;.

- '' -

. -. "f

- v r"

-1 ''

- -.

- .-''

' •'•.'.

. '

.'."' -

.''. '

- ;..-

'"' '•'•

i;--'; A

iV '*

.'-•••-

V; -

. - '..

' .

.. .,

. .'

' v

:

-: -

;-.:

-.'

. ;..

. :".

:..-.

"r*'

-

1. .'.

.- •••'•

rf.vr

.sv.

•. '-

' -

- -~

t: .'

- '

' -

' '

- .

.•"•y

1 .

. .

' '

. '.

- -

j-

'v

. .4-

"t

"-

'

- '-

- .'.

. '

.' .'

: .

'. .

-. -

- -

- '

i; '.

i ?

."

' ,H

- "

'' '

'. '

'- " -

''-

' 'i

*l

' .-'

'';T

R :,

' . "-

: ' ••f

'-'.-,-

. -' '

:. :

.-' .;-

- -v

' . ;:

- •::-

-.--.-.,

t ,;-

,-;

- -..-

-;, •-.

..•••.

..,vv

:t ?v

. i''.

•*t*

* *

. '

*,-

*

,,

. *

. ,,

^ . \

* .

. .

. -*'

, *

i*

\ *

^ f

i ..

' - '

- ,

-.'

- -

' . .

' ,-

' '

. '

.. •••

- '

v - :

. .

'. '

' .

" . '

l.'

' - - -

-.-.

. "

v*:

- ,-t

tlv

' - '

. '

;---

-'

- -

. -

. ,-

" '.

- -

" .

.--

-. -

- '.

.-•••

' '.V

.-.

.' -.

--...-

.;'..

.;

.'•'I

:..:-

..- -.

..yf-

:..'

*.;.-

. •-•-.•

-,- •••:

- -:- •

••-'

-.5; -

:" .-'.

-.

- - 'f-

r---.-

. . •••\-

-.'-i:v

*: ' v\

v^-:-

::v.'^.-

.,*r*\

r;-..

... ••

..'.

-- '

' .

.-"-

.V'

. '

. v

- :

- -.'

.:---

. .-

. •-•

•- 'W

'J

','i.

'.•..:

.:- •

•.••;-

".i;l

.V'y

1,:/•

...-

.. '

-. -

- -

-- -

' . .

-.. -

::*

.- -.-

. -:,

- ;-

*.:..,

v- :

!,'-*'-

.;.s..;

'.-j.i

v.v-

-'

.'v

-,.,1 -

. ..

:':.

'.

.'-.

- v.

-..;

.v:

. -

-:.

.•.-

,y

-; ;v

' •-.-:

V ..

," ' i

: ::;

-.J

/ o:-;

^A

l.. ,-

:y ,.

^ '

,- -.-

-. —

. :__

'_

-. __ -

•"•••-

•^.--

•^.

••-•' .•

'••-.

:^^k

-v-..

::,v^

:*v-. ;

:-;v'J

ur.vi

vi

. :

r,i:"

HIA

WA

THA

. - t-

. -*.

*. -- -

..I..

5 ^'

^.-

- t

K -i'

''.r

•t:

--.v/-

'-•"

•V/

'. '

: -

*' '

!-':

'. l

1 ^-

;".v

'i''

" V

V.^

?"'.V

- ^•

•.iP'

:-/:

. ^-

'••-'.

. .-.•.

' - .

:*'

'f .V

W '

.

' ''.

- '

' ' .

'

McE

WJN

G'

'

i;..'

. l

\'M ••.t w

- ]-

- -v

v .,-

i '

,

1^.-

.'';v^

-1 -

'..

i '

s1 l-

- -H

n

^

. 15

" '

0 :

-S;'

',; B

^ |

r;,

1 :;.

ri*

. S

V\

o —

, -

' .

s: v^ i

-M

v : i

^* .

B

.** 5

-25,

,--..r

i-d--

i ^

.'.i-

!2 m

T

S --

..1

;

' *

v -

i

•'••'•'^

..cs.

5 *

l'

30Q

.??^

C[l

Ht)

3

- .-':

•'

. --

2 P

" r

1^'!.

- :--'

1iV.

'; .'

'.

.-.-.i v.

:--".:/-,

'.-.••:

^7..!.

:,.1

' ^.

^ :*

'' ..v

. '.:

"' '

-.^.

v-

.

:. 7.

-. -;

" "'

' -''

' -

- --

-"

' ~

'-

\'•i

-

v.

^^

J^-

:--

J"*k

REFERENCES

AKEAS WITHDRAWN fROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLYS.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYM.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

OntorNo. DM* Dtowritton Fito

peg

GEGLQOGY AND STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLES

LEGEND

Proterazoio Intrusive Rooks

ob diabase

Archean Intrusive Rooks

di biotite-diorite

pegmatite

hornblende-quartz monzonite

biotite-quartz monzonite

gd granodiorite

Archean Metamorphic Rocks

amphibolite

biotite-quartz-plagioclase migmatitic paragneiss, with significant peg, qmz gd

biotite-quartz-plagioclase schist/paragneiss

KEY

attitude of foliationoo"

—2r*- attitude of fold axis

—*— attitude of joint/fracture

—NB-1S stream sediment sample location 92-prefix omitted

MCCOIG - TP,

(L h-

LtUJo irUJ

CD

c

l(T

FROST TP. G.23IO

REFERENC S

LEGEND

4 rv.

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No OTHER ROADS TRAILSSURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.LOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS. ETC

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -* UTILITY LINES " NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS i SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS. " . SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY......" . MINING RIGHTS ONLY ,.....

LEASE, SURFACE 81 MINING RIGHTS.." .SURF ACE RIGHTS ONLY._...." . MINING RIGHTS ONLY.........

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .——...™. ORDER-IN COUNCIL _________... RESERVATION ____________....CANCELLED ___.______.......SAND ft GRAVEL ____.___........

MOTE: MINING MIGHTS IN PARCELS fATENTEO PMION TO MAH 1913. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE W THE LANDS ACT. NX.O 1*7O. CHAP. MO. SEC. S3. SUVSCCj

SCALE: 1 INCH ^ 40 CHAINS

FEETO 1OOO 2OOO 6000

O 200 METRES

1OOO11 KM)

200013 KM|

TOWNSHIP future

CROSSM.N.R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

HEARSTMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

ALGOMAMinistryof LandNatUIBl ManagemvntResources Branch

Ontario

DataMARCH 4,1983

•••••r

G-229942F1SSE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 220

REFERENCES

AREAS WITHDRAWN PROM

M.K.O. - MINING MIGHTS ONLY

t.R.0. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYM.* S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

FI*

(5) 43(RSaW7D) W 54/72 AUG.3/72 SRQ.

®43{RSjO.I97O) W. 66/77 28/6/77 SJUX

(SUsdt&aiVTO) W. 78/80 15/2/80 SJtCL® P.L.A. 1953

164585 MS 541 165541 77094 *S

SAND and ORAVEL

QUARRY PERMIT M.T.C. Qrawl Pit M.T.C. Gravtl Pit No. 3D-7

GEOLOGY AND STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLES

LEGEND

Proterozoic Intrusive Bocks

* diabase

Archean Intrusive Rocks

di biotite-diorite

pegmatite

hornblende-quartz monzonite

biotite-quertz monzonite

granodiorite

pog

pgn

se*

2**

MCMILLAN TP. G-2324

:)..-.M

amphibolite

biotite-quartz-plagioclase migmatitic paragneiss, withsignificant peg, qmz. ,. gdh—b

biotite-quartz-plagioclase sch i st/paragne i ss

attitude of foliation

attitude of fold axis

attitude of joint/fracture

•NG-1S stream desiment sample location 92-prefix omitted

42F15SE0002 OP92-B59 MCMILLAN 230

O) CVJ CVJo

en eno tr o

19 l 18 l 17 l l! l . 15

MCEWING TP. G-2332

REFERENCES

i

LEGEND ;HIGHWAY AND ROUTE Mo OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEYED LINES

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC -LOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS. ETC

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC

RAlLWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

mcDncmnu ne mn wu i

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS. " . SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY___" . MINING RIGHTS ONLY ^.^.

LEASE, SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS-. " .SURF ACE RIGHTS ONLY____ " . MINING RIGHTS ONLY——————

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ™—-,.^.ORDER-IN-COUNCIL ————————.RESERVATION _____________....CANCELLED ______________SAND ft GRAVEL ______________.

MOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED * Rimum 1*13. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE E™ 1*ME LANDS ACT. RS.O f*7*. CHAP. *M

SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

FtETO 1OOO MOO

O 200 METRES

1000M KM 1

TOWNSHIP

ARNOTT

\trv

M.N.R. A DM l PI l STRATI VE DISTRICT

HEARSTMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ RE6ISTRY DIVISION

ALGOMA

•

1li

Ministryof LandNatural ManaResources Branch

Ontario

••uM A R. C H 4J9S3 G-247

R E F E R E N C E S LEGENDFRO*DISPOSITION HIGHWAY AND ROUTE N*.

OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEVfO

FINTRY TWP.MJUX-MINING RIGHTSONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS TOWNSHIPS. BASE LMES. LOTS. MINING

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARY *MINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAV * UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHOREUNE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

imfnmmL':DISPOSITION

INTERMEDIATE

PATENT. SURFACE ft MUMNC ~ .SURFACE RIGHTS " . MINING RIGHTSOMLT

LEASE. SURFACE ft MINXJ " . SURFACE RIGHTSONLV " . MINING RIGHTSONLY '

LICENCE OF OCCUPATKNIORDER-IN-COUNaLRESERVATIONCANCELLEDSAND ft GRAVEL

SCALE: 1 INCH-40CHAMt

GEOLOOGY Aid STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLES

Proterozoic Intrusive Rocks

db diabase

Archean Intrusive Rocks

di biotite-diorite

pegmatite

hornblende-quartz monzonite

biotite-quartz monzonite

granodiorite

Archean Metamorphic Rocks

amphibolite

biotite-quartz-plagioclase migmatitic paragneiss, with TOWNSHIPsignificant peg, qmz gdh—b

biotite-quartz-plagioclase sch i st/paragne i ea M.N.R

HMIHIH6 OIVISIOIattitude of foliation

attitude of fold axis

attitude of joint/fracture LAID TITLES/ •EtlSHY

•NG-1S stream sediment sample location 92-prefix omitted

MmistiyuC Natural25 24 23 22 21 20 19 10 9

••U KMUARY JM42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN

r,4-K1161055

L

LO LIE L2E L3E L4E L5E L6E L7E L8E L9E

LP

IS

f 9" . 1

gds*})9

- — ——— — — — — — ^tst? 7Sr ^o

— — — - — —— . _ M*O*~~ ~~~ovnmv

-r^'

mrw ffp^^ ^

^

ci-^

2

ts-t -^

C?t5 t 7

, ehwe^ ts ^Wrieitie Sth'.it 11-88- room.— r

~^~~ —— -V" '*mmV ^

.c X 3S f-yjVJ. 9i.BS-roi

,^ —— -*^^ ~^*** *~)

m

n

x-"" —— "•"" "S" y \ - 1 \ .-—-s , 1

*t

Q

^^ ^~**

K. Cad ^

fci- J^-^

C^-- — -

l**? "^^

-rs 0,-i- tst ?0tst ?

qi-BB-loilR

J"00 J"

tst? ^^r r.--"'"";if/, po r-r.--

JR 1 ^^. — ^J ..-

y ;-. "^ y •••-..

— - — - r .........^mv ' Kmv *— -

^

\ — 1 '

^

1" """

^itVp

xtsH ,bi

* "* -..

T-vi

Ohim\/

CmnivW9-

3dC

C

IS -

'7^t"51. f"

85 N,

--•x. 3S -. * - ** * ™

•-. ^ii-, 10' 1.7 R

, PO

\ 4S ,~

) * l

Sfi.-'' --Ar -

yo

C

wwv -t.., O ' jl.seJi'Aw,eU. ' C f

"***^ T "^ x -^

ci. * 7l5t-l ^^.^ilpO2R

C-!OO*p S w-'

dIZ

tsn-t ^'

JL.

^trj)o,HWR

iwmv, '^ mftS5W' mm,

mas \

fto —

("•\ ^J iCrs:

iz^r^^'ol6R t5 /0,"*?

*r — ~

Qmmv

C3; WVWiV,

;

\ \

\ c^-••r- \

We \..-- V)

111

5K)

),

3 gd

::.:-l-^

t1-- 5r:5*itvp 1

r #4 jmnh~",^:9

F———- '

1 ^s-tj ,PO i 00^^ I006R

^S ———

cc, sl.f Jixtoti

j"

A mw\/ ^sl.s.K'.stos,

' ,]

rive

i-

^r ,*)5 C '

s'r&iS '*VP /ft

x/ 5^4d XV, poorly |am. *~-^

~-s— — — — — '.fVp

O~x-f-T — "7 .-'"" ^.?0 )/I'.rS.--'''' itvp/^ cUi+vp f rnv5d ,. — x ^xL,-i ——c•^^"w

c-^.

1 5 —— 80 "~""w ^- *— i-*T~VC'

--" (Jit

CIOWR ///^ J

i coe R ^

^u.

^ — J ^- —— ' d^ : mm

, i . j^~

" — v^^

Of} ....-.---Ui.

^li

sv? ~^(y eo JC/ ^

C^.——

/CfC—-—Zt-^

sitvp 3b '^\

^.b 1

^Ji ^r^r — — — — CDX ^,IOIOR — — -^^2"yst. w ^—— ' JL Q

"^p massive mmv

: shear, ser. ichijt quartz tytS

C wipW. Subcrop 1-7-A po

-iL.

^ "~ 9^

" 5^ c^ — .mmv

^•tii— ——— — : jtj.

rp ^~-^ ygdc?^ .^/f5 ^ - ^liVp -^ (C-

—— Co??

O'*'rrD5"""""^tSvo-t

mmv, mo**ivt

mmv, 4B ff.? x^l-Z'/o po 5 lOllC.

'1-

^

/^fr\Tt\\i

'X?!. ich.itoi*, band*J

IS

M+Vp

'itVp

Hv,•f ^2S

1 1 m o n\ -h c. \o\\f. ,

3S

^*Tnw\v, si- scVi'.i+txt j cc

L3+50E L4+50E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

LEGEND

D

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

VIOLA LAKE STOCK

Biotite-granodiorite

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

Gabbro

Biotite-diorite

l itv

ts

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 250

To accompany report by Robert M, Kuehnbaum

mmv

META5EDIMENTARY AND METAVOLCANIC ROCKS

UPPER KEEWATIN SUPERGROUP

MONUMENT BAY GROUP

Intermediate tuff and tuff breccia

Tuffaceous sedimentary rocks and sedimentary rocks

ts - wacke w

ts - siltstonest

ts - felsic to intermediate tuffaceous sedimentary rocks * (aquagene tuffs)

ts ., ts indicates uncertain origin st-t w-t

mafic metavolcanic Flow, massive

KEY

bipcc

cblpo

ser

outcrop

bedrock subcrop fragments in soil pit

geological contact: defined, approximate

attitude of inclined schistosity

biotitepyroxene porphyroblastscalcitechloritepyrrhotitesericite

shear or mineralized zone fault

Abbreviations

si - slightly lam - laminated

(92-BB]1013R rock sample location, prefix omitted

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52E79

GEOLOGY 8c ROCK SAMPLE LOCATIONS

50l —— l l

Metres

50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN^ 1

LO L5E L6E L7E L8E

K1161055

L3+50E L4+50E

L9E

LP

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

Contour Intervals

61OOO nTBOOOO598005970O59SOO595OO594OO593OO592OO59OOO58OOO

42F1SSE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 260

Instrument:: Geometrics G-816 Proton Magnetometer Total Field Measurements

Base Station

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52EX9

MAGNETIC SURVEY CONTOURED VALUES

50Metres

50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 2

LO LIE L2E L3E L4E L5E L6E L7E L8E L9E

K1161055

L3+50E L4+50E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

1 cm ^

D

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

Quadrature (Q)

/l

l

In-Phase (I)

42F15SE0002 OP92-BS9 MCMILLAN 270

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

-f- !

Transmitter: NAA Instrument: Geonics EM-16 Readings taken facing south

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52EX9

VLF-EM SURVEYNAA

IN-PHASE S QUADRATUREPROFILES

50________O i—i i—i i—i

Metres 50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 3

LO LIE L5E L6E L7E L8E

K1161055

L3+50E L4+50E

L9E

LP

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

Contour Intervals

14O120100SO6O4020O

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 280

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52EX9

VLF-EM SURVEYNAA

FRASER FILTERED CONTOURS

50i i

Metres 50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 4

K1161055

L

LO

is

2S

LIE L2E L3E

LP

L4E

BASELINE

L5E L6E L7E L8E L9E

LP

ir-br o bedrtcK cHipt

(bufffcU'y 9180 621 (

)rotdi*"" br -Till fcj.1 (

1 9 fij - br sandy f.|l frw(

Fbwgf ttlt 61-H

) in .g t -VD oranjt t '.II 6|6 (

)roed. br. -K.O bi7(

).kbrcl-*t 6|j (

) b* 151*1 6|5 (

)orqr*je br (d, 6M C

613 (

6l2(

611 (

———————————————————— g, —————————————————————————

)r-brcl-tt

)y-br Vi H

) br fill

Mt^rty HU

) bcijt id -it

, ,

* - " 91 88 6^*1 (

Htbr sd-it-tl 640(

)med br-jrey till jj}(

)r-br cl-st jj5(

(meJ. br et-fl 6}7(

)ik br el-*t f Wl) 636C

L 6K(

3S 63-H

633 (

631 (

MM

9) 00-630 () Ltbr graoilly t'.Lt ^1K

) [t br sd-Jfft-v*! 6tB(

} br jd-jro^l 627 (

) It br Sd-Jt, graW.^t P'bblw 6M(

) It br si 6U(

(r-br fill t mfceKVfj ^2i|(

)r d- rick fill t r"* e^'-P 1 ..fellj

h r~b*- ^''^ fr rfl ^^^'-p* .-*'' -

) r f-iulij p*bMj 111 :-' fl ^

) br jd-st^-br el-rid. +-.II * •...........

(••tt f ra*t .

is -

*bfcl-r-KJ,f.ll

(brsd-it-cL

) f-bffl-ld .flj ( Crack fraji(b;^u. 8S(

(brxi .r.-i.U 85 C (WUfclts

)m*diumb' td- 46 (

).|t br-jnj ci. 87 C

..-••*fl(

••••" fl?(

90 C

91 (

1=1

~2S IH92-88- 10(

9 C

8()m*d.kr. 5t-cl 7(

) i. i. ,. 6(

) b^yt *d-H-il 4 (

) i- " Sd-*t 3 (

j ,. ,. ,, j,

- , 3S -

J It .r-br *d-j*-cl

)red ririidual so'il ^"th-fn^t.

)br sd-jl-cl.

)r.-br *^-el i (

7(J(

4S

rr-brel-jt -,(f-bfidl-J-t

) ii ii

l li M 72(

Inifd birsdrKl 7^(

)Ubr Jt-Si 76( 77-*

-li.

lbrcl-*t 79 C

)dtcbrsd.-it4 ft) C

flic

92-882^

20(

27 (

26 (

)m(dbrfV-c 2J(

)dklr Jt-c * 14 ( kcdretk fmji

)4lcr-brei-sv 21(

)rn*dbi-**-cl 22 (

)d.fc br - " 21 (

)mtdbrfd-st-cl 20 (

r" " " |J-(

) - - Sd-st- |8(

\ \H

i 16 (

\ IJ ' \ H(

(r-br-#*-*l |3 (

)m*d br-.jt-el ;j(

) It br Sd -jV.-d

#lT#4

.

* u - St-Cl

d —

( " *- "1 92-00-^2 (

) ii H n

)med r-br *1

) dk br st-a

, -. - -

)M(d.br 5t-

hJk br "

) mid. br 5cl-; '.' ".:) br ft -el -*

41 (

* bedrock fregj 39 (

38 (

31(

36 (

a31^

33 (

3l(

30 C

txdrock frqgt

s

)f-br jt-cl

) i- i.

)dltbr ik-cl^n b*drock W BB-tf '

) " - i- So (

)r-br cl-*l A1(

)ttk br cl-Jt c rock Irajj 4g (

) mod br cL-st -S|7(

)dkbr Cl-It-Sd 4( (

)-mtd br - - JjJ-j

)Ltbr*t-tL 44 (

) b*'ye id-jt-tt. 43(

) " - Ci .--•""

| t- t* Ccl - SI -*l

r Io0-y *t-c[ ..-

)brid-*t-cl .--'[...-•-•r-*2lf3

. i. ^

.......-•-•••••^

...--••••••"""

*

)dUbrjt-cl S18(

) - n sic) " " Sil

, ,. i., l**"^ Sf( ) r. id-j-t-il 4 ted'o^tf rm^s Sic

K-br jd-ii-cl 53 (

M* k ir " " S2-(

)Ubr - - .......••••••••

) br .';.-- -"

j it br sl- 4 l,(eaw.y

(dky-br it-St| 92-88-6K

)dU br cl-*(- , loamy ^j(

) i. ,. .- ,on b^drack 67 (

) - - - . l"0wvy 66(

)im**l br id-jt-cl 65 (

)dk.br - - 64(

hb^Ki^ ** *- 63-i

61 (

6o(^U-

B

IS

t*

(ile. br st-tl * bedrock fra^f

| li l* .' M

• r-br "

) y-br st-tl

jikbr st-cl

) It br id-it

)bei^t - -

f — 1LI

K1191242

L3-r50E L4+50E

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

KEY

••'v ...^, stream'111 - swampm claim post, tied to grid D claim post, not tied to grid

91-BB-61O — 1991 soil sample92-BB-1 1992 soil sample

Abbreviations of soil colour and components:

It - light dk - dark med - medium r - red br - brown y - yellow

sd - sand st - silt ci - clay frags - fpagments

42F15SE0002 OP92-B59 MCMILLAN 290

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52E79

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

SAMPLE LOCATIONS SOIL DESCRIPTION

50 O i—i i—i i—r~

Metres

50 TOO—l

150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 5

K1161055

L

LO

IS

40

I1()

21 ( ) 119

LIE L2E L3E

LP

L4E

BASELINE

L5E L6E L7E L8E L9E

LP

m () i BO

IS --

2S

ii(Z3()1J8

U()M

fi

is

*5( )U8 H()UB

3S --

4S

35OH1*

\

A)*x-.-40

'3lf"KC7550 '~~ lrtl'"40

\.-^'12^13

L3+50E L4+50E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

o

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

CuQZn (Ag) values in ppm. Only detectable values ofAg are shown; all others are O.5 ppm

50-54®25O-273 probably anomalous values, ppm (Cu S Zn only)

anomalous values, ppm (Cu S Zn only)

* Contour intervals (ppm)

Cu ———40 ————— -50- ———— -75-— —

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 300Zn •250-

• 4OO -•55O-

jlk^accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52E79

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

Cu, Zn, AgCONTOURED VALUES

Cu, Zn

50________OF——l l——l l——[~

Metres 50 TOO 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 6

LO LIE L2E L3E

K1161055

L3+50E L4+50E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

CoCDNi (Mo) values in ppm. Only detectable values ofMo are shown; all others are <l ppm

33-40 45-54 probably anomalous values, ppm (Co E Ni only)

anomalous values, ppm (Co S Ni only)

Contour intervals (ppm)

Co ———30 ——— ——— 50- ——

NiTfC

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 310

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52E79

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

Co, Ni, MoCONTOURED VALUES

CO, Ni

50 t

Metres

50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 7

LO LIE L2E L3E L5E L6E L7E L8E

K1161055

L3+50E L4+50E

L9E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

KEY

-'v...^w stream III - swampm claim post, tied to grid D claim post, not tied to grid

values For Pb and Mn in ppm; Fe in X

.1-1 l^oo probably anomalous values, Fe X, Fb S Mn ppm 1 oUU 1 r\ys . v

anomalous values, Fe X, Mn ppm

Contour intervals (ppm)

42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 320

Pb

Fe -

- 17(ppm)-

—— 4.2U) -

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52EX9

B HORIZON SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

Pb, Fe, MnCONTOURED VALUES

Pb, Fe

50________O t—i i—i i—i-

Metres

50 100=^- 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 8

LO LIE L2E L5E L6E L7E L8E L9E

LP

K1161Q55

r^'-'-'-^^s

L3+50E L4+50E

K1191242

Adams River Bay (Lake of the Woods)

D

KEY

streamswampclaim post, tied to gridclaim post, not tied to grid

B Horizon Soil Geochemical Anomalies

1 Sdil anomaly described in text

— Cu5O ——— 5O ppm Cu contour

— Zn25O ——— 25O ppm Zn contour

— Co3O ——— 30 ppm Co contour

— Ni45 ——— 45 ppm Ni contour

— Pb17 ——— 17 ppm Pb contour

Simplified Geological Legend

gd granodiorite, Viola Lake Stock

gb gabbro, diorite

itv intermediate tuff and tuff breccia

tS tuffaceous volcanic - sedimentary unit

mmv massive mafic metavolcanic rocks

— ——— geological contact, approximate and observed

geologically i nterpreted f au 11

observed shear or mineralized zone

Geophysical Interpretation

by: F. L. Jagodits, P.Eng., Consulting Geophysicist

2#"xv.:3? approximate outline of magnetic body, with anomaly code (M1) and ^iiii^ probable cause of anomaly: g - gabbro, m - mafic volcanics

(3l^- approximate limit of magnetic domain, granitic {GR] and volcanic V domains indicated

.^- — — *- poor-^..^--^. mediocre axis of VLF-EM conductor, with anomaly code

magnetically interpreted fault or shear

interpretation uncertain42F15SE0002 OP92-859 MCMILLAN 330

To accompany report by Robert M. Kuehnbaum

BEAR BAY CLAIMSKenora Mining Division, N.T.S. :52E79

COMPILATIONSIMPLIFIED GEOLOGY,

GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION8t B HORIZON

SOIL GEOCHEMICAL ANOMALIES

50 O r~

Metres 50 100 150

Sept. 92 Scale 1:2,000 PLAN* 9