proposed avoided cost for cost-effectiveness determinations
DESCRIPTION
Proposed Avoided Cost for Cost-Effectiveness Determinations. January 5, 2009. Picking the Cost-Effectiveness “Limit”. Deemed Measure cost-effectiveness analysis uses regional avoided cost assumptions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Proposed Avoided Cost for Cost-Effectiveness
Determinations
January 5, 2009
2
Picking the Cost-Effectiveness “Limit”
• Deemed Measure cost-effectiveness analysis uses regional avoided cost assumptions
• Historically, these assumptions are consistent with the Council’s medium wholesale price forecast adjusted for:– Market price risk– Load uncertainty– Resource cost uncertainty– Fuel price uncertainty– Carbon control cost uncertainty
3
Final 6th Plan Forecast of Future Wholesale Market Prices is Slightly Lower the Draft Plan
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t P
rice
(2
00
6$
/MW
H)
Historical
5th Plan - Medium
Draft 6th Plan - Medium
Final 6th Plan - Medium
4
This Is Due to Lower Forecast Natural Gas Prices and the Impact of RPS Resources
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030City
Ga
te N
atu
ral G
as
Pri
ce (
20
06
$/M
BT
U)
5th Plan FinalDraft 6th PlanFinal 6th Plan
5
Future Wholesale Market Prices Span a Wide Range
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t P
rice
(2
00
6$
/MW
H)
Historical6th Plan - Low6th - Medium6th Plan - High
6
Medium Market Prices Must Be Adjusted for Risk Before Use In Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
• The “Right” Market Price forecast is one that results in the amount of conservation identified as cost-effective by the Resource Portfolio Model (RPM) over 20-yrs– Lost-Opportunity = 3090 MWa– Non-Lost Opportunity = 2870 MWa– Total = 5960
7
Method for Selecting the “Appropriate” Market Price Forecast
• Use Aurora Mid-C Market medium price forecast without carbon control cost
• Add “conservation risk premium” from Resource Portfolio Model (RPM)– $50 /MWh for Lost-Opportunities– $??/MWh for Non-Lost Opportunities
• Adjust Aurora price with premiums to reflect carbon control price until “mini-RPM” builds similar level of conservation as full RPM
8
What’s the “mini-RPM”
• Identical to full Resource Portfolio Model except all inputs are “deterministic”– Medium price forecast for gas and electricity– Medium load forecast– Expected value cost for resources, forced outage
rates– Fixed carbon control cost and timing
9
6th Plan Medium Forecast w/No Risk Premium or Carbon Control Cost
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t P
rice
(2
00
6$
/MW
h)
Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4
10
6th Plan Medium Forecast with RPM Risk Premium without Carbon Control Cost
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t Pri
ce (
20
06
$/M
Wh
)
Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4
11
6th Plan Medium Forecast with RPM Risk Premium and Carbon Control Cost*
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t Pric
e (
20
06
$/M
Wh
)
Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4
12
6th Plan Medium Forecast Compared to Forecast Adjusted for RPM Risk Premium and Carbon Control Cost
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30
Wh
ole
sale
Ma
rke
t Pric
e (
20
06
$/M
Wh
)
Base Base+Risk Adj. Base+Risk Adj.+Carbon Adj.
*Assumes Flat Load Shape
13
Levelized Avoided Cost-Limit for Lost-Opportunity Conservation Resource Installed in 2010 with Flat Load
Shape and 20-year Expected Useful Life
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
Lev
eliz
ed C
ost
(200
6$/M
WH
)
Base Market Price Base+Risk Adj. Base+Risk Adj. +Carbon Adj.