project management of dag: eastern anatolia...

12
Project Management of DAG: Eastern Anatolia Observatory Onur Keskin (a) , Cahit Yesilyaprak (b) , Sinan K. Yerli (c) , Lorenzo Zago (d) Tolga Guver (e) , Sinan Alis (e) (a) FMV Isik University. Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Istanbul/Turkey; (b) Atatürk University, Science Faculty, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Erzurum/Turkey; (c) Orta Dogu Teknik Universiteesi (METU), Physics Department, Ankara/Turkey; (d) Institut d'Automatisation Industrielle de la HEIG-VD, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland; (e) Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Istanbul/Turkey ABSTRACT The four meter DAG (Eastern Anatolia Observatory in Turkish) telescope is not only the largest telescope in Turkey but also the most promising telescope in the northern hemisphere with a large potential to offer scientific observations with its cutting edge technology. DAG is designed to be an AO telescope which will allow both infrared and visible observations with its two Nasmyth platforms dedicated to next generation focal plane instruments. In this paper, status updates from DAG telescope will be presented in terms of; (i) in house optical design of DAG, (ii) tender process of telescope, (iii) tender process of enclosure, and (iv) tender process of the observatory building. Also status updates from the focal plane instruments project and possible collaboration activities will be presented. Keywords: Project Management, Telescope, Enclosure, Observatory Building 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Telescope Mount Coordinate System The telescope mount coordinate system is a fixed coordinate frame, which is aligned about the azimuth axis on the defined park position, and has its origin at the intersection of the Altitude and Azimuth axes of the telescope. It is used for dimensioning all non-moving parts of the telescopes. The telescope coordinates have axis labels X, Y and Z. The XY plane is horizontal. The X-axis points towards the defined park position, the Y-axis is rotated 90 deg, and the Z-axis points toward the Zenith. The rotational angles about the X, Y and Z axes are designated α, β and γ respectively. The zero points for the α and γ axes are in the direction of the Y-axis. The zero point for the β axis lies in the directions of the Z-axis. In cases where confusion might arise between telescope coordinates and the movable coordinate frames for the telescope tube and enclosure, the telescope mount coordinates axes are appended with a subscript -M to indicate the frame referred to (i.e. XM, YM, ZM, αM, βM, γM, etc.). The arrangement of the telescope axes is shown in the figure below. 1.2 Enclosure Coordinate System The enclosure coordinate system is fixed with the rotating enclosure and aligned with its observing slit. When in park position, the coordinate system is consistent with the telescope mount coordinate system described in Figure 1. The direction of the enclosure parking position is looking south, with the slit directed toward the service building (TBC). The local Z axis always points towards the vertical. The local Y axis always points toward the center of the enclosure observing slit. In cases where confusion might arise between telescope mount coordinates and the movable coordinate frames for the telescope tube and enclosure, the optical tube coordinates axes are appended with a subscript -E to indicate the frame referred to (i.e. XE, YE, ZE, γE). Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, edited by George Z. Angeli, Philippe Dierickx, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911, 99110S © 2016 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/16/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.2234459 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-1 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

Upload: vantuyen

Post on 17-Feb-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Project Management of DAG: Eastern Anatolia Observatory Onur Keskin(a), Cahit Yesilyaprak(b), Sinan K. Yerli(c), Lorenzo Zago(d) Tolga Guver(e), Sinan Alis(e)

(a) FMV Isik University. Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Istanbul/Turkey; (b) Atatürk University, Science Faculty, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Erzurum/Turkey; (c) Orta Dogu Teknik

Universiteesi (METU), Physics Department, Ankara/Turkey; (d) Institut d'Automatisation Industrielle de la HEIG-VD, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland; (e) Istanbul University, Faculty of

Science, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Istanbul/Turkey

ABSTRACT

The four meter DAG (Eastern Anatolia Observatory in Turkish) telescope is not only the largest telescope in Turkey but also the most promising telescope in the northern hemisphere with a large potential to offer scientific observations with its cutting edge technology. DAG is designed to be an AO telescope which will allow both infrared and visible observations with its two Nasmyth platforms dedicated to next generation focal plane instruments. In this paper, status updates from DAG telescope will be presented in terms of; (i) in house optical design of DAG, (ii) tender process of telescope, (iii) tender process of enclosure, and (iv) tender process of the observatory building. Also status updates from the focal plane instruments project and possible collaboration activities will be presented.

Keywords: Project Management, Telescope, Enclosure, Observatory Building

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Telescope Mount Coordinate System

The telescope mount coordinate system is a fixed coordinate frame, which is aligned about the azimuth axis on the defined park position, and has its origin at the intersection of the Altitude and Azimuth axes of the telescope. It is used for dimensioning all non-moving parts of the telescopes.

The telescope coordinates have axis labels X, Y and Z. The XY plane is horizontal. The X-axis points towards the defined park position, the Y-axis is rotated 90 deg, and the Z-axis points toward the Zenith. The rotational angles about the X, Y and Z axes are designated α, β and γ respectively. The zero points for the α and γ axes are in the direction of the Y-axis.

The zero point for the β axis lies in the directions of the Z-axis. In cases where confusion might arise between telescope coordinates and the movable coordinate frames for the telescope tube and enclosure, the telescope mount coordinates axes are appended with a subscript -M to indicate the frame referred to (i.e. XM, YM, ZM, αM, βM, γM, etc.). The arrangement of the telescope axes is shown in the figure below.

1.2 Enclosure Coordinate System

The enclosure coordinate system is fixed with the rotating enclosure and aligned with its observing slit. When in park position, the coordinate system is consistent with the telescope mount coordinate system described in Figure 1.

The direction of the enclosure parking position is looking south, with the slit directed toward the service building (TBC). The local Z axis always points towards the vertical. The local Y axis always points toward the center of the enclosure observing slit.

In cases where confusion might arise between telescope mount coordinates and the movable coordinate frames for the telescope tube and enclosure, the optical tube coordinates axes are appended with a subscript -E to indicate the frame referred to (i.e. XE, YE, ZE, γE).

Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, edited by George Z. Angeli, Philippe Dierickx, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911, 99110S

© 2016 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/16/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.2234459

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-1

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

Figure 1. Orientation of the telescope coordinates

2. TELESCOPE REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Optical Tube Coordinate System

The optical tube coordinate system applies to the telescope tube, which is the main body of the telescope holding the primary (M1), and secondary (M2) mirrors and such. When in park position, the coordinate system is consistent with the telescope mount coordinate system described in Figure 1.

The local Z axis always points towards the line of sight. As the telescope is pointed off-zenith towards zenith angle of 90 degrees (or an elevation angle of zero, horizon pointing), the positive Y axis points up (to zenith for a horizon pointing telescope). The Z axis then points towards the horizon in the direction of the telescope pointing as the telescope moves toward horizon pointing (elevation angle of zero). This provides the local coordinates used by the M1, M2 and M3 assemblies and any other items mounted to the telescope tube.

In cases where confusion might arise between telescope coordinates and the movable coordinate frames for the telescope tube and enclosure, the optical tube coordinates are appended with a subscript -T to indicate the frame referred to (i.e. XT, YT, ZT).

2.2 Reference to Optical Design

The principle optical schematics of the telescope is illustrated in Figure 2. The telescope shall provide two Nasmyth foci but no Cassegrain focus. Table 1 gives the nominal design of the telescope configuration, for three values of the primary mirror f-number specification range, and a primary mirror diameter of 4 m. These numbers are indicative of the final optical configuration.

1. Radius of curvature and distances between mirrors vertex are given in absolute value. 2. Distances are defined along optical axis, from vertex to vertex 3. Entrance pupil of the telescope is the primary mirror. 4. Primary mirror thickness is indicative and values given here ensure that lateral supports contact points, collocated

with the plane of the center of gravity of the mirror. Lateral support contact points are at the mid height between the height of the vertex and the height of the meniscus, on the mirror edge. In this configuration lateral supports need only to apply forces in the mirror plane and not in the axial direction as well.

2.3 Optical System Requirements

Specifications were derived assuming that M1 is a thin mirror controlled in shape and position by an active optics (aO) system, consisting of a number of axial and lateral actuators. It nonetheless also applies to other mirror types (segmented, semi-rigid, etc.).

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-2

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

Parameters constant to all designs - units [mm]FT/Dl FT D1 A3 B3 M1M3 M3F

14 [-] 56000 4000 425 300 -1000 4200

Primary mirrorF1 /D1 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 -

F1 6400 6800 7200 7600 8000 [mm]

R1 -12800 -13600 -14400 -15200 -16000 [mm]

K1 -1.004750 -1.005585 -1.006512 -1.007535 -1.008658 -

Secondary mirror - mirror diameter is for an unvignetted FoV of 30'F2/D2 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 -

D2 662.643 686.835 710.720 734.305 757.596 [mm]

F2 -1111.663 -1232.458 -1359.618 -1493.217 -1633.333 [mm]R2 -2223.325 -2464.916 -2719.236 -2986.434 -3266.667 [mm]

K2 -1.627157 -1.680976 -1.737038 -1.795454 -1.856341e 0.166 0.172 0.178 0.184 0.189

Mirrors separationsM1M2 -5415.385 -5717.197 -6015.190 -6309.434 -6600.000 [mm]

M2M3 4415.385 4717.197 5015.190 5309.434 5600.000 [mm]

Normalized parametersk 0.153846 0.159236 0.164557 0.169811 0.175000

m2 8.750000 8.235294 7.777778 7.368421 7.000000p 0.173697 0.181244 0.188836 0.196476 0.204167ß 0.500000 0.470588 0.444444 0.421053 0.400000

4000

2000

o

-2000

-4000

M2

N2

M3

F,/D,=1.8

N1

M1 -

-8000 -6000 -4000 -2000 o

Table 1. Nominal design of the DAG telescope configuration

Specifications also consider the presence of an adaptive optics (AO) system – not part of the telescope delivery – which may be able to correct residual static errors, to some extent (as determined by the AO actuators stroke). Nevertheless, specifications are made such that the telescope will be a seeing limited telescope when operating in seeing limited mode, and a diffraction limited telescope when operating in AO correction mode.

Figure 2. The actual optical schematic is defined in accordance to requirements

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-3

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

Table 2. Optical System Requirements of DAG Telescope Primary mirror clear aperture (D1): 4.0 m;

Primary mirror focal ratio (f1): 1.8

Configuration: Ritchey-Chretien (RC) M1 and Μ2 are hyperboloids with conic constants matched to cancel off-axis coma and spherical aberration.

Focal Planes Two Nasmyth foci. No Cassegrain focus

Effective focal length: 56 m

Operational waveband: 350 to 3000 nm

Unvignetted FOV (diameter): 30 arcmin available at the Nasmyth foci

Primary science FOV: 10 arcmin

Number, location of Nasmyth foci: Two foci, located 4.2 m after M3

The AO system foreseen for the DAG telescope has a deformable mirror with an inter-actuator distance (ΛΑΟ) of 0.4 m, as projected in the entrance pupil plane (M1). According to Nyquist/Shannon sampling theorem, wavefront errors at spatial scales shorter than twice the inter-actuator distance, i.e. 0.8 m, cannot be corrected. The AO system cutoff spatial frequency is therefore defined as the spatial frequency associated to the inter-actuator sampling, 1/(2ΛΑΟ).

Because the deformable mirror actuators grid is generally square, the AO correction domain in the spatial frequency space also has a square shape. Wavefront aberrations which can be described with spatial frequencies inside the square are defined as low order WFE, while wavefront aberrations that are located outside this domain are designed as high order WFE. It is clear that low order WFE could in principle be seen and then corrected by the AO system wavefront sensor (WFS), while the high order ones could not.

This being said, because it is not certain that the future AO system geometry will be square, and because it simplifies specifications, we will assume here that the low frequency corrected domain is circular, therefore the cutoff frequency will be defined for all directions inside the pupil, not only for two given orthogonal directions.

In this respect, demonstration of the low order and high order residual wavefront errors specifications are met regardless of the direction of measure inside the entrance pupil.

2.4 Secondary Mirror

The secondary mirror M2 will be a convex mirror controlled in five degree of freedom: decentering, piston, and tip-tilt relative to the vertex. The alignment mechanism will have the following requirements:

Table 3. Alignment mechanism requirements of DAG telescope Focus (Δz) Decenter (Δx, Δy) Tip-tilt (θx, θy) Absolute Accuracy 10 μm 20 μm 20 arcsec Incremental accuracy referred to a 20 μm focus move 2.5 μm 5 μm 5 arcsec

The range along all degrees of freedom are adequate to ensure at the Nasmyth foci the image optical quality specified in terms of WFE, under all applicable gravity and thermoelastic deformations experienced by the telescope.

On-axis aberrations generated by M2 misalignment within the specified incremental accuracy, as seen from the focal plane (defocus, astigmatism, 3rd order coma and spherical) is expected to be significantly smaller than the on-axis WFE budget. Off-axis aberrations generated by M2 misalignment as seen from the focal plane will be significantly smaller than the expected off-axis astigmatism for the Ritchey-Chretien configuration, over the 10’ science FOV.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-4

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

2.5 Tertiary Mirror

The tertiary mirror M3 will be a flat, elliptical mirror, inclined at 45 deg with respect to the telescope optical axis. It will be actively aligned along piston (telescope axis) and tip-tilt. The range along all degrees of freedom are adequate to ensure at the Nasmyth foci the image optical quality specified in terms of WFE, under all applicable gravity and thermoelastic deformations experienced by the telescope. The M3 mechanism shall have the following requirements:

Table 4. M3 mechanism requirements of DAG telescope

Piston (aligned along the ZT axis) Tip-tilt (Rx, Ry)

Absolute Accuracy 10 μm 20 arcsec Incremental accuracy

referred to a 20 μm focus move 2.5 μm 5 arcsec

2.6 General Applicable Requirements for M1, M2 and M3

Table 5. General applicable optical requirements of DAG telescope

Micro roughness Micro roughness shall be lower than 2 nm rms (goal 1 nm rms). The assumption is that micro roughness for the three mirrors add in quadrature, totalizing to 3.5 nm (1.7 nm goal).

Optical surface Scratches, pits and digs according to DIN3140: 5/6x0.4; K2x0.025

Reflectivity (coated optical surface):

Aluminum coating; 90% in [350-700 nm], 85% in [700-950 nm], 90% in [950-1050 nm], 95% in [1050-1300 nm], 97% in [1300-1800 nm], 98% in [1800-3000 nm].

2.7 Mechanical Requirements

Table 6. Mechanical requirements of DAG telescope Mounting: Altitude-Azimuth

Zenith blind spot (ZBS): ≤ 1 deg Zenith angle

Azimuth range >= ± 270 deg

Altitude range (in maintenance mode) αM = –90 to +90 deg

Altitude range (in observing mode) Zenith Angle = ZBS to 70 deg

"Locked" system (structural) eigenfrequencies > 8 Hz

Slew speed 2 deg/sec + 8 second settling time

Pointing accuracy, absolute (blind pointing error)

< 2 arcsec for any point in the sky with Zenith angle < 70 deg,

Pointing accuracy, incremental < 0.1 arcsec for a 10 arcmin offset in any direction

Tracking accuracy, open loop rms < 0.1 arcsec for one minute

Tracking accuracy, closed loop with rms < 0.1 arcsec for one hour under maximum telescope wind

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-5

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

autoguider load

• Maximum mean wind speed: U = 4 m/s

• Turbulence intensity: σu/U = 0.2

• Turbulence scale: L = 2 m

• Wind power density according to the Von Karman spectrum:

with n = frequency (Hz),

Secondary mirror alignment The support mechanism will provide fine alignment along 5 degrees of freedom: piston, tip-tilt, x- and y-center.

Tertiary mirror flip and alignment The mechanism will provide the following functions: • Switching the light beam to alternate Nasmyth foci

• Fine alignment along 3 degrees of freedom: piston (ZT axis), tip-tilt

Instrument Nasmyth flanges (Figure 3) Load capability: 2000 kg located 1.7 m from the flange and attached to it, plus 2000 kg as equipment laying on the platform itself, with center of gravity at its center.

Instrument envelope (Figure 3) Load capability: 2000 kg located 1.7 m from the flange and attached to it, plus 2000 kg as equipment laying on the platform itself, with center of gravity at its center.

Figure 3. DAG telescope design

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-6

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

3. ENCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 3.1 General Applicable Requirements of DAG Enclosure

Table 7. General requirements of DAG enclosure

Free inner volume:

a. Half sphere centered at X,Y,Z=0 with radius (upward)=7.0 m

b. Cylinder below this half sphere of radius=7.0 m and height=3.065 m

c. Cylinder centered at X=0, Y=5.6 m, with radius (directed along Y) =2.5 m, top not lower than Z=3 m, free volume all the way downward. This free volume shall be provided for one particular angular position of the rotating enclosure.

d. The overall free height shall include all margins required by the hook of the overhead crane to access all points of the above defined volume.

Azimuth track Circular azimuth track centered on the telescope azimuth axis

Height (position) of azimuth track –4 m from Z=0 level Slit width 4.5 m Minimum free elevation angle of view of telescope for a 4-m diameter light beam centered at X,Y,Z=0 10.5 deg

Minimum free elevation angle of telescope for maintenance. 0.0 deg

3.2 Mechanical Requirements of DAG Enclosure

Table 8. Mechanical requirements of DAG enclosure Rotation range ± 275 deg Maximum rotation (slew mode) speed adjustable up to 2 deg/sec + 8 second settling time Rotation accuracy, absolute (blind pointing error) < 1 deg

Rotation accuracy, incremental < 0.1 deg for a 5 deg offset in any direction Rotation accuracy, closed loop with feedback signal < 0.05 deg for one hour (with a smooth operation)

Slit doors opening/closing time < 2 minutes

Overhead crane travel Along YE axis: YE from –7.0 m to +7.0 m Along XE axis: XE from –2 m to +2 m

Overhead crane load 6.5 metric tons Lifetime profile 30 azimuth revolutions at maximum speed per day

4. PIER INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS The pier characteristics are defined by the telescope manufacturer (AMOS) to withstand the followings:

• With the telescope dummy fixed on the pier with 24 points, with only translational constraints, the first three eigenfrequencies of the system is higher than: (i) 8.07Hz bending in X direction; (ii) 8.22Hz rotation around Z axis; (iii) 9.71Hz bending in Y direction.

• The minimum local stiffness values under each mechanical jack are: (i) Vertical stiffness: 1.5e9 N/m; (ii) Lateral stiffness: 2.0e8 N/m

• total vertical load: 858kN (dead load), 1950kN (survival), -236kN (upward, survival)

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-7

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

• total lateral load applied at 1836mm above the pier interface: 3kN (due to wind), 1250kN (survival due to seism and wind simultaneously)

• total torsion torque applied on the top pier: 14kNm (due to the azimuth telescope motor)

5. OBSERVATORY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Enclosure Support Building

Table 9. Enclosure support building requirements

Main functions:

3-floor building surrounding the telescope pier: 1. Pier floor: access to pier 2. Base floor: access to building, maintenance labs 3. Observing floor: access to telescope and instruments 4. Topped by the rotating enclosure circular support slab Thermal control of telescope volume by forced ventilation.

Enclosure support top surface (interface with anchorages the enclosure support track):

Circular slab of - outer diameter 16 m - inner diameter 14 m, with a 5-m wide hatch in correspondence with the slit in parking position. Located 2 m below reference origin (altitude axis)

Observing floor

Circular slab of - outer diameter 16 m - inner diameter 7 m Located 4 m (TBC) below reference origin (altitude axis)

Pier height from foundation slab imbedded in solid ground 3 m

Building foundation Separate from pier foundation

5.2 Maintenance and Control Building

Table 10. Maintenance and control building requirements

Main functions:

Multi-functional building adjacent to the enclosure building, providing 1. In/outlet of telescope optical units (M1, M2, M3) by an

elevator, providing access to enclosure base and observing floors.

2. Storage, cleaning and coating plant for telescope optics. Handling crane for all M1, M2, M3 operations.

3. Observatory control room 4. Vehicle storage (garage) for a middle size van. 5. Workshop 6. Living facilities: dorms, canteen, infirmary

Building foundation Separate from enclosure foundation Optics handling requirement Defined by M1 cell: 5x5x2 m, 10 tons Volume for optics storage, cleaning and coating plant

At least 12x8x4 m, with direct access to the outside. The height specified is meant under the hook of the crane.

Control room 25 m2 Workshop 30 m2 Vehicle storage 25 m2, with direct access to the outside

Living facilities Dorms: 4 rooms, each 20 m2 Canteen: 30 m2 Infirmary: 20 m2

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-8

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

Greenjiouse& ReverseTrombe Wall

Entwine

I

imuth,Floor, -74:1 ,II r ` Intermdiatey i Floor:,' oun dl Floor

_-'l

Sun Shaders

FitneseCente

6. CURRENT STATUS 6.1 Telescope

• Telescope FDR has been successfully passed with compliance to technical specifications. • M1 mirror blank is to be delivered by mid-August 2016. • Procurement of the main orders by AMOS is undergoing.

6.2 Enclosure

• Enclosure PDR passed with compliance to technical specifications. • FDR will take place by mid-July 2016. • Manufacturing of the embedded plates is expected by the first week of August 2016.

6.3 Pier

• The pier design proposed by GUNARDA and PROMER has been checked by EIE and AMOS about the local stiffness at the interface level with the mechanical jacks and about the dynamical behavior.

• The local stiffness requirements are fulfilled. • Pier manufacturing will be finalized by September 2016.

6.4 Observatory Building

• FDR of the observatory building been successfully passed with compliance to technical specifications. • Groundworks is expected to be finalized by September 2016.

Figure 4. Exploded drawing of DAG observatory with the enclosure and telescope

6.5 Schedule

• Whole schedule is given in Figure 5.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-9

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

esso

rs

31 d

ays

days

lay

days

10 d

ays

20 d

ays

20 d

ays

1 w

ks

1 da

ys

30 d

ays

10 d

ays

0 da

ys0

days

5 da

ys

5 da

ys

1 w

k

2015

Hal

f 2, 2

015

MIA

IMIJ

JIA

ISIO

INID

I TO

Tol

os^o

po

T

lalf

1, 2

016

alf 2

, 201

6al

f 1, 2

017

alf 2

, 201

7H

alf 1

, 201

8JIFIMIAIMIJ JIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJ JIAISIOINID

JIF

IMIA

IMIJ

FD

R T

eles

cop'

a

1Mou

nt M

anuf

actu

rirjg

Tel

esco

pe P

re -

asse

mbl

y

Tel

esco

pe F

acto

ry T

gst

Mou

nt

Tel

esco

pe D

isas

sem

bly

SR

R T

eles

cope

Tra

nspo

rt T

eles

cope

Hal

f 2, 2

018

alf 1

, 201

9H

alf 2

, 201

9H

JIA

ISIO

I NID

JIF

IMIA

IMIJ

JIA

ISIO

INID

Tel

esco

pe p

arts

sta

ndß

yU

PC

K T

eles

cope T

eles

cope

unp

acki

ng a

nd e

rect

ion

ER

EC

Tel

esco

peM

2 an

d M

rea

dy fo

r sh

ipm

ertt

M1

mirr

or F

inal

Acc

epta

nce

at L

OS

Tr.

nsp

ortto

St-

Pet

ersb

ourg

Mirr

ois

tran

spor

t to

obse

rvat

ory

- A

TA

SA

MM

1 an

d ot

her

optic

s in

tegr

atio

nT

eles

cope

fina

l AIV

PA

C T

eles

cope

- E

nclo

sure

R E

rlosu

re Man

uf. E

mbe

dded

pla

tes

ansp

ort e

mbe

dded

pla

tes

Pie

rs d

esig

n re

view

R E

nclo

sure

Tm

Inst

alla

tion

embe

dded

pla

tes

Man

uf. E

nclo

sure

F)SR

Ren

clos

ure

Tra

nspo

rt e

nclo

sure

Unp

acki

ng e

nclo

sure

Dom

e S

truc

ture

Cla

ddin

gM

echa

nism

s pa

rt 1

Pla

nt In

stal

latio

n pa

ri 1

Ele

ctric

al In

stal

latio

n pa

rt 1

Win

ter

paus

e

B41

1din

gs d

esig

n re

view

Civ

il w

orks

con

trac

ting

and

conc

rete

wor

ksii

Win

ter

paus

e

Mec

hani

sms

part

2E

lect

rical

Inst

alla

tion

part

2

ePre

Com

mis

sion

ing

Acc

epta

nce

Tes

ts &

Tra

inin

gT

PA

C e

nclo

sure

Bui

ldin

gs fi

nish

ing

and

serv

ices

AS

Dur

atio

nS

tart

Fin

ish

Pre

dec

1 da

yT

hu 5

.03.

15T

hu 5

.03.

15

900

days

Mon

25.

01.1

6F

rl 5.

07.1

91F

S +

2:

3

1 da

y

228

days

Mon

25.

01.1

6M

on 2

5.01

.16

Tue

26.

01.1

6T

hu 8

.12.

16

165

days

25 d

ays

Fri

9.09

.16

Thu

27.

04.1

74F

S-6

5

5FS

-1

1

6

Thu

27.

04.1

7W

ed 3

1.05

.17

1 da

yT

hu 1

.06.

17T

hu 1

.06.

17

20 d

ays

Fri

2.06

.17

Thu

29.

06.1

7 7

1 da

yF

ri 30

.06.

17F

ri 30

.06.

17 8

45 d

ays

Mon

10.

07.1

7F

ri 8.

09.1

7 9F

S +

5

180

days

Mon

11.

09.1

7F

ri 18

.05.

1810

1 da

yM

on 2

1.05

.18

Mon

21.

05.1

8 11

106

days

Mon

21.

05.1

8M

on 1

5.10

.18

11

1 da

yT

ue 1

6.10

.18

Tue

16.

10.1

8 13

0 da

ysF

ri 10

.08.

18F

ri 10

.08.

18

0 da

ysF

ri 31

.08.

18F

ri 31

.08.

18

10 d

ays

Fri

31.0

8.18

Thu

13.

09.1

816

30 d

ays

Fri

14.0

9.18

Thu

25.

10.1

8 17

;15

55 d

ays

Fri

26.1

0.18

Thu

10.

01.1

9 13

;18

115

days

Fri

11.0

1.19

Thu

20.

06.1

919

1 da

yF

ri 5.

07.1

9F

ri 5.

07.1

9 20

F5

+'

739

days

Tue

1.1

2.15

Frl

28.0

9.18

1 da

yT

ue 1

.12.

15T

ue 1

.12.

15

1 da

yF

ri 25

.03.

16F

ri 25

.03.

16

61 d

ays

Mon

25.

04.1

6M

on 1

8.07

.162

4FS

+:

29 d

ays

Tue

19.

07.1

6F

ri 26

.08.

16 2

5

1 m

onF

ri 25

.03.

16T

hu 2

1.04

.16

1 da

yF

ri 15

.07.

16F

ri 15

.07.

16

34 d

ays

Mon

26.

09.1

6T

hu 1

0.11

.162

6FS

+:

36 w

ksM

on 1

5.08

.16

Fri

21.0

4.17

28F

S +

,

1 da

yM

on 2

4.04

.17

Mon

24.

04.1

730

70 d

ays

45 d

ays

133

days

118

days

Mon

27.

03.1

7F

ri 30

.06.

17 3

1 F

S -

2

Mon

8.0

5.17

Mon

22.

05.1

7

Fri

7.07

.17

32S

S +

:

Wed

22.

11.1

7M

on 2

2.05

.17

Wed

1.1

1.17

33S

S+

100

days

Thu

29.

06.1

7W

ed 1

5.11

.173

5F5

-9

45 d

ays

Thu

21.

09.1

7W

ed 2

2.11

.17

35F

S-3

40 d

ays

Thu

28.

09.1

7W

ed 2

2.11

.17

37S

S+

40 d

ays

Thu

28.

09.1

7W

ed 2

2.11

.17

37S

S +

,

20 w

ksT

hu 2

3.11

.17

Wed

11.

04.1

839

100

days

Thu

12.

04.1

8W

ed 2

9.08

.184

0

30 d

ays

Thu

12.

04.1

8W

ed 2

3.05

.184

0

40 d

ays

Thu

12.

04.1

8W

ed 6

.06.

1840

30 d

ays

Thu

7.0

6.18

Wed

18.

07.1

843

30 d

ays

Thu

19.

07.1

8W

ed 2

9.08

.184

4

1 da

yF

ri 28

.09.

18F

ri 28

.09.

1845

433

days

Wed

23.

03.1

6F

ri 17

.11.

178w

ksW

ed 2

3.03

.16

Tue

17.

05.1

6

2 m

ons

Wed

18.

05.1

6T

ue 1

2.07

.164

84

mon

sT

ue 2

6.07

.16

Mon

14.

11.1

6

5 m

ons

Mon

26.

12.1

6F

ri 12

.05.

1750

6.5

mon

sM

on 2

2.05

.17

Fri

17.1

1.17

51F

5+'

IDT

ask

Nam

e

TO

- T

eles

cope

Con

trac

tual

Tel

esco

pe M

ilest

ones

FD

R T

eles

cope

Mou

nt M

anuf

actu

ring

Tel

esco

pe P

re -

asse

mbl

y

Tel

esco

pe F

acto

ry T

est

DR

R M

ount

Tel

esco

pe D

isas

sem

bly

SR

R T

eles

cope

Tra

nspo

rt T

eles

cope

Tel

esco

pe p

arts

sta

ndby

UP

CK

Tel

esco

pe

Tel

esco

pe u

npac

king

and

ere

ctio

nE

RE

C T

eles

cope

M2

and

M3

read

y fo

r sh

ipm

ent

M1

mirr

or F

inal

Acc

epta

nce

at L

ZO

:

Tra

nspo

rt to

St-

Pet

ersb

ourg

Mirr

ors

tran

spor

t to

obse

rvat

ory

-AT

44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

®M

1 an

d ot

her

optic

s in

tegr

atio

n

®T

eles

cope

fina

l AIV

PA

C T

eles

cope

Con

trac

tual

Enc

losu

re M

ilest

ones

TO

- E

nclo

sure

PD

R E

nclo

sure

@__

Man

uf. E

mbe

dded

pla

tes

Tra

nspo

rt e

mbe

dded

pla

tes

Pie

rs d

esig

n re

view

FD

R E

nclo

sure

Inst

alla

tion

embe

dded

pla

tes

Man

uf. E

nclo

sure

SR

R e

nclo

sure

Tra

nspo

rt e

nclo

sure

Unp

acki

ng e

nclo

sure

Ere

ctio

n en

clos

ure_

?D

ome

Str

uctu

re

Cla

ddin

gM

echa

nism

s pa

rt 1

Pla

nt In

stal

latio

n pa

rt 1

Ele

ctric

al In

stal

latio

n pa

rt 1

Win

ter

paus

eE

nclo

sure

fina

l AIV

Mec

hani

sms

part

2E

lect

rical

Inst

alla

tion

part

2

Pre

Com

mis

sion

ing

Acc

epta

nce

Tes

ts &

Tra

inin

gP

AC

enc

losu

re

Con

trac

tual

Bui

ldin

g M

ilest

ones

Bui

ldin

gs d

esig

n re

view

Civ

il w

orks

con

trac

ting

Site

and

con

cret

e w

orks

Win

ter

paus

e

INB

uild

ings

fini

shin

g an

d se

rvic

es

Figure 5 Gantt Chart of the whole DAG Project

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-10

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

7. FUTURE WORK As the largest telescope project moves forward, the additional FPI project has just been funded by the Ministry of Development of Turkey. DAG team, within this short time scale and in collaboration of four national universities, has started the FPI project. The Project will be coordinated by Ataturk University Astrophysics Research and Application Centre (ATASAM) which was founded in 2012 and is responsible for most of the astrophysical, and electro-optical research funded by the Ministry of Development. There will be three supporting laboratories which will be established within the framework of the DAG-FPI project. These laboratories will be established at the following universities: i) FMV Isik University (for AO and DR research and development); ii) Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi/METU (calibration laboratory); iii) Istanbul University (MKID).

Currently, desired type of instruments for the DAG telescope is given in Table 11. At the moment, there expected to be one AO supported focus at the telescope. However, DAG team is investigating the possibilities for building a second AO system for the other focus as well. This, in principle, is possible as the AO system (including DR) will be built in Turkey at FMV Isik University.

Table 11. DAG FPI Instruments Focus Instrument No Wavelength Type Local Contribution (%) Int. Contribution (%) N1/N2 - DR 50 50

N1 - AO 90 10 N1 A VIS IMG 95 5 N1 B NIR IMG 95 5 N1 C VIS+NIR NT - 100 N2 A VIS SPEC 80 20 N2 B NIR SPEC 80 20 N2 C ? ? ? 100?

N1: AO hosting focus; N2: Non-AO focus; DR: Derotator; AO: Adaptive Optics; NIR: Near-IR; IMG: Imaging; SPEC: Spectroscopy; MOS: Multi-object Spectroscopy; NT: New technology detectors

The main purpose of the DAG-FPI project is to obtain first generation instruments for the DAG telescope. This includes optical and near-infrared detectors and both for imaging and for spectroscopy. Since the national observatory of Turkey has been operational, Turkish astronomical community is well familiar with FOSC instruments built by the Copenhagen University. This kind of instruments (FOSC series, FORS2@VLT etc) are generally the workhorses of observatories. In this respect, a multi purpose instrument for optical and its equivalent in near-infrared are desired. These two instruments most likely will be installed at the Nasmyth-2 focus where the AO system will not be operational. But depending on the discussions that will undergo before the commissioning and even during the building of the instruments, these multi purpose instruments can be installed at the Nasmyth-1 focus. The need for AO both for imaging and spectroscopy is driven mainly by the scientific rationale of the DAG project, and broad research interests of the Turkish astronomical community.

The design of the telescope is made so that each Nasmyth focus can hold three instruments up to a total weight of 2000 kg. N1 will be equipped with an AO system for the moment. A brief overview of the expected instrument distribution for the two foci is given below:

N1-a: An imager (can be metal oxide semiconductors) for the optical wavelengths where high resolution imaging is needed.

N1-b: A NIR imaging detector. Depending on science cases this instrument can be used with or without AO given the typical field-of-view of such detectors are quite small already.

N1-c: A microwave kinetic inductor detector as a new technology instrument will likely be placed. This will be operated around at temperatures of 100 mK and allow observing from optical to near-infrared wavelengths.

N2-a: DAG Project team has decided to obtain a spectrograph which willl operate between 350-1000 nm with resolutions between 100-3000. This instrument is expected to be a workhorse for the Turkish astronomical community.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-11

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx

N2-b: As DAG will be the first and largest telescope to operate in the near-IR in Turkey, spectroscopy will be very crucial. This instrument will enable Turkish astronomers to work in the wavelength range of 0.9 – 2.5 microns.

N2-c: Although it is desired to have a multi-object spectrograph (if not possible with N2-a), this instrument slot can be reserved for future collaborations.

This ambitious project will not only serve to national but also to the international astronomical communities. At this stage, all kind of scientific and technical collaborations are very welcome and expected.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors would like to thank Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Development; FMV Işık University, Istanbul/Turkey; Atatürk University, Erzurum/Turkey (Project No: 2011K120230, 2016K121140); Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara/Turkey (Project No: 2016K121380); Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud (HEIG-VD), Yverdon-les-Bains/Switzerland; Istanbul University, Istanbul/Turkey (Project No: 2016K121370); Atatürk University, Erzurum/Turkey, Astrophysics Research and Application Center (ATASAM), Erzurum/Turkey; FMV Işık University, Center of Optomechatronics Application and Research (OPAM), Istanbul/Turkey; Istanbul University Observatory Research and Application Center (IUGUAM), Istanbul/Turkey; for their support throughout the DAG project.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9911 99110S-12

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 08/23/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/termsofuse.aspx