program reviews

41
Program Reviews 2011 NHASFAA Fall Conference

Upload: deliz

Post on 15-Feb-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Program Reviews. 2011 NHASFAA Fall Conference. What is a Program Review?. A review conducted by the Department of Education to evaluate compliance with Title IV statute and regulations Improve future institutional capabilities Identify liabilities owed for errors. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Program Reviews

Program Reviews2011 NHASFAA Fall Conference

Page 2: Program Reviews

2

What is a Program Review?A review conducted

by the Department of Education to evaluate compliance with Title IV statute and regulations

Improve future institutional capabilities

Identify liabilities owed for errors

Page 3: Program Reviews

3

Why Does FSA Conduct Program Reviews?Required by lawTo ensure that funds are

used for the purposes intended by Congress and taxpayers

Schools and FSA have a fiduciary duty to Congress and taxpayers

Program integrity is important

Page 4: Program Reviews

4

Program Reviews In General Analyze institutional data and records Frame required actions and

recommendations to strengthen future compliance

Quantify harm and identify liabilities, if any

Refer institutions for administrative action, if necessary

Page 5: Program Reviews

5

Top Program Review Findings(Ranked by Frequency)

Verification errorsReturn of Title IV funds

made lateReturn to Title IV (R2T4)

calculation errorsStudent credit balance

deficienciesCampus crime

requirements not met

Page 6: Program Reviews

6

Top Program Review Findings(Ranked by Frequency)Account records inadequate/not

reconciledInconsistent information in student

fileIndependent student status not

documentedPell overpayment/underpayment

Page 7: Program Reviews

7

Top Program Review Findings(Ranked by Dollars)

Ineligible programInaccurate recordkeepingReturn of Title IV funds

not madeInconsistent information

in student fileFFEL disbursements

attributed to unattended/incorrect payment periods

Page 8: Program Reviews

8

Top Program Review Findings(Ranked by Dollars) Improper Pell disbursement - prior to

midpointVerification errorsAdvances used for non-program

purposesIncorrect Pell calculationFailure to meet factors of financial

responsibility

Page 9: Program Reviews

9

Program Review - BackgroundProgram reviews are

generally conducted on-site217 program reviews

conducted nationwide in 2009-10 fiscal year

For more information, see The Program Review Guide for Institutions 2009 which can be found under publications tab on IFAP

http://www.ifap.ed.gov/ifap/byYear.jsp?type=programrevguide

Page 10: Program Reviews

10

Program Review Guide Topics

Department preparation for program review

Institution preparation for program review

Entrance conference ED review of institutional processes

and data ED review of student level information

Page 11: Program Reviews

11

Program Review Guide Topics Exit conference/status meeting Referrals Post review communication and report Final determination and follow-up Appendices (definitions and sample

information)

Page 12: Program Reviews

12

How Schools Are Selected for Program ReviewsConducted on a

systematic basis to include all participating institutions

Priority for selection◦Cohort default rate in

excess of 25% or highest 25% of default rates

◦High (top 25%) default rate in dollar volume

Page 13: Program Reviews

13

How Schools Are Selected for Program Reviews

Priority for selection◦Significant fluctuation in Federal Pell

Grant or FFEL/FDL funding levels◦Deficiencies reported by state

licensing or accrediting agencies◦High annual dropout rates◦Other institutions that ED determines

pose a significant risk of non-compliance

Page 14: Program Reviews

14

Risk ReductionFully resolve audit findingsFully address all findings in

the corrective action plan and be sure you follow through

Revise policies and procedures to avoid repeat findings

Attend training and keep current on program changes.

Page 15: Program Reviews

15

Types of Program ReviewsGeneral assessment review

◦Random sampling of files◦Broad review of institutional policies and

processes◦Generally includes multiple offices on

campusFocused program review

◦Focused on one or more areas of Title IV administration

Off-site or on-siteAnnounced or unannounced

Page 16: Program Reviews

16

Notification to School of Review

Telephone notification to President and Financial Aid Director

Written announcement letter

Specifies information to be provided prior to review◦Student recipient data◦Institutional information

Page 17: Program Reviews

17

Requirement to CooperateCooperation in conduct of program

review requiredProvide timely access for examination

and copying of recordsProvide reasonable access to

personnel associated with Title IV administration for the purpose of obtaining relevant information

Page 18: Program Reviews

18

Preparing For The ReviewProvide requested information by

required deadlineInform all administrators at your

school about the reviewEmphasize to staff the review is of the

institution’s compliance

Page 19: Program Reviews

19

FSA Research Prior to ReviewFSA internal paper and electronic records

◦EZ Audit◦NSLDS◦G5◦COD◦FISAP◦Campus Security website◦IPEDS

State and accrediting agency information

Page 20: Program Reviews

20

Entrance ConferencePresident or CEO needs to be presentAll offices with any role in Title IV

administration◦Financial Aid◦Registrar◦Business Office◦Admissions◦Placement◦Campus Security

Page 21: Program Reviews

21

Entrance ConferenceIntroduction of FSA and school

representativesOverview of program review

processHow Title IV is processed at

the institutionLogisticsPossible scheduling of exit

conference/status meeting

Page 22: Program Reviews

22

During the ReviewProvide review team

with secure workspaceAccess to computer

records, including print capability

Access to photocopierContact for reviewer

questionsEnsure staff availability

for interviews

Page 23: Program Reviews

23

Review of Institutional Processes and DataInstitutional and program eligibilityAdministrative capability - required

policies and proceduresRefund and withdrawal proceduresPackaging, awarding and disbursing

proceduresCampus securityVerification policies and procedures

Page 24: Program Reviews

24

Review of Institutional Processes and Data

Fiscal records and procedures

Cash management and reconciliation procedures

FISAPStudent consumer

informationSatisfactory Academic

Progress

Page 25: Program Reviews

25

Staff InterviewsReviewers will

interview multiple staff

The institution cannot dictate who will be present during interviews

The institution cannot tape record staff interviews

Possible interviews with third-parties

Page 26: Program Reviews

26

FSA Review of Student-level InformationSample of student files reviewedReview multiple sources of student

records◦Admission records◦Academic records, including current

transcript◦Financial Aid records◦Student account record (ledger)

Student interviews may be conducted

Page 27: Program Reviews

27

Resolution of Findings While On-Site

Possible discussion of findings during the review

School may attempt to resolve these findings

Resolved findings still included in Program Review Report

Page 28: Program Reviews

28

Exit ConferenceUsually conducted if fieldwork

is substantially complete Topics may include

◦Required Actions◦Outstanding items and

submission timeframes◦Oral notification of

preliminary findings◦Next steps in program

review process

Page 29: Program Reviews

29

Status MeetingConducted if fieldwork

not completed and/or data has not been analyzed

Similar to exit conference◦Required Actions◦Outstanding items and

submission timeframes◦Next steps in program

review process

Page 30: Program Reviews

30

Possible ReferralsWithin the Department

◦Administrative Actions and Appeals Division

◦Management Improvement Services

◦Office of Inspector General

External referrals◦State licensing agency◦Accrediting agency

Page 31: Program Reviews

31

Post Review ActivityProvide all outstanding

documents requested by the reviewers

Additional information may be requested

Reviewers may return for additional on-site work

FSA will complete analysis of data and issue a written report

Page 32: Program Reviews

32

Program Review ReportPreliminary report of non-

compliance findingsDescribes required actions

including file reviews if necessary

Establishes timeframe for institutional response

List of student files reviewed attached as appendix

May include recommendations

Page 33: Program Reviews

33

Institution Response to Program Review ReportContact reviewer with any and

all questionsSubmit all information required

in the requested format by the established deadline

Complete required actionsRequest extension of time to

respond if necessary

Page 34: Program Reviews

34

Expedited Determination Letter (EDL)Serves as preliminary report and final

determination letterSchool is not required to respondUsage limited

◦No findings, or only minor and non-systematic findings

◦Any identified findings corrected prior to EDL issuance

◦Any liabilities identified were paid/collected prior to issuance of EDL

Page 35: Program Reviews

35

Final Program Review Determination Letter (FPRD)Notifies the institution of the

Department’s final determination for each finding

No further action required – FPRD closes the review

Includes copy of Program Review Report and school response(s) to report

Issued within 30-60 days of FSA’s receipt of a complete and final response

Page 36: Program Reviews

36

FPRD – School Action RequiredContains original finding,

summary of school response, Department’s final determination

Identifies liabilities, if any, and instructions for payment

Appeal rights for monetary liabilities

Proof of repayment of liabilities to loan holders may be required

Page 37: Program Reviews

37

Appeal of Monetary LiabilitiesMonetary liabilities may be

appealed within 45 daysAppeal filed with FSA’s

Administrative Actions and Appeals Division (AAAD)

Collection of liabilities deferred for appealed amounts

Non-appealed liabilities still have to be paid

Appeal may be referred to Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)

Page 38: Program Reviews

38

FPRD Close-OutWritten letter closes program reviewIssued after school completes actions

required by FPRDNot issued of the school is filing an

appeal for any liabilities

Page 39: Program Reviews

39

Record RetentionRetain records until later of review

closure or normal record retention period

Page 40: Program Reviews

40

Contact InformationFor questions about this session:

Anita Olivencia, Training [email protected] 617-289-0130

Please provide any comments regarding this training or the trainer to:

Thomas Threlkeld, Title IV Training Supervisor

[email protected]

Page 41: Program Reviews

41

Your Boston Regional Training TeamAnita Olivencia, Training Officer

◦617-289-0130◦[email protected]

Pam Gilligan, Training Officer◦617-289-0022◦[email protected]