professor graham foster · 12/12/2014 1 in partnership with queen mary, university of london, uk...
TRANSCRIPT
12/12/2014
1
in partnership
with
Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Professor Graham Foster
Pre-conference Clinical Course
in partnership
with
COMPETING INTEREST OF FINANCIAL VALUE > £1,000
Statement
Professor Graham Foster has received consultancy and speaker fees
from BI, BMS, AbbVie, Janssen, GSK, Gilead, Merck, Roche, Springbank,
Achillion and Novartis.
Date: December 2015
Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Professor Graham Foster
Pre-conference Clinical Course
12/12/2014
2
End Stage Liver Disease
Graham R Foster
Professor of Hepatology
Queen Marys University of London
Disclaimer
• I have received fees from BI, BMS, Gilead,
Merck, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Springbank,
Idenix
• The views expressed are my own
12/12/2014
3
End Stage Liver Disease
• Numbers
• Decompensation
• Cancer
• Therapeutic options
End Stage Liver Disease
• Numbers
• Decompensation
• Cancer
• Therapeutic options
12/12/2014
4
End Stage Liver Disease
• PHE estimate that around 10,000 patients
with HCV have cirrhosis
• A proportion per year will develop HCC and/or
decompensate
Systematic review: outcome of compensated
cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C infection
Alazawi et al Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 3, pages 344-355, 22 MAY 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04370.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04370.x/full#f1
No therapy Therapy
Death/OLT per year 4.62% 3.79%
HCC per year 4.79% 2.52%
12/12/2014
5
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
From: The Risk of Long-term Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C: Results From an
Analysis of Data From a Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Registry
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):204-212. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12505
End Stage Liver Disease
A growing problem
• Hospital admissions and deaths related to
HCV: England.1
12/12/2014
6
End Stage Liver Disease
Worse before it gets better
End Stage Liver Disease
• Numbers
• Decompensation
• Cancer
• Therapeutic options
12/12/2014
7
End Stage Liver Disease
• Decompensation:-
ascites/encephalopathy/bleed
• Unpredictable
• Often sepsis associated
• Need hepatological input
Decompensation - Prevention
• Avoid futile drugs (benzos, PPIs, NSAIDS)
• Warn patients of risks
• Regular endoscopies
• ?? Anti-coagulation
12/12/2014
8
End Stage Liver Disease
• Numbers
• Decompensation
• Cancer
• Therapeutic options
End Stage Liver Disease - HCC
• Most feared complication
• Increasing treatment options for early
malignancy
• Catch it early – scan every 6 months
12/12/2014
9
End Stage Liver Disease
• Numbers
• Decompensation
• Cancer
• Therapeutic options
Telaprevir SVR rates by fibrosis stage in
treatment-naïve patients
SVR, considered virologic cure, was defined as HCV RNA undetectable 24 weeks after last planned dose Marcellin P, et al. J Hepatol 2011;54(Suppl 1):S183
SV
R (
%)
PR48
67/147n/N=
T12PR
109/134
PR48
67/141
T12PR
117/156
F0–F1 F3
PR48
17/52
T12PR
32/52
F4
T12PR
13/21
PR48
7/21
F2
12/12/2014
10
Barts & London Experience
• Early audit of Protease Inhibitors
• 29 Genotype 1 patients treated with triple
therapy
29 pts TVR (24 pts ) BOC ( 6 pts)
Gender % male 79%
Mean age 53.8 yrs
Treatment exp 15 relapse (51%)
7 non-responders( 24 % )
7 naiive ( 24 % )
Varices 10 (34%)
7 (24 %) not known
Haemoglobin 14.25 (17.2-12.5)
Platelets 137 (210 – 43)
Albumin 43 (50 - 34)
Creatinine 74
Baseline Characteristics
12/12/2014
11
48% premature discontinuation
Outcomes
48% premature discontinuation
3/29 (10 %) futility rules
2/29 (6.8 %) viral break through
9/29 (31%) stopped due to side effects
Outcomes
12/12/2014
12
48% premature discontinuation
3/29 (10 %) futility rules
2/29 (6.8 %) viral break through
9/29 (31%) stopped due to side effects
3 decompensated
3 rash
1 DDI
2 sepsis ( 1 death )
Outcomes
7/29 ( 24 % ) have achieved SVR
1/29 (3.4 %) relapsed post treatment
7/29 (24 %) - treatment is ongoing
- all currently viral negative
Virology
12/12/2014
13
7/29 ( 24 % ) have achieved SVR
1/29 (3.4 %) relapsed post treatment
7/29 (24 %) - treatment is ongoing
- all currently viral negative
We killed 1, we cured 7
This is NOT a good average
Virology
Adverse Events with 12 weeks Peg/Riba
G3 cirrhosis study with Peg/Riba
Time to withdrawal –
Patients randomised to 24
weeks
Time to withdrawal –
Patients randomised to 48 weeks
First 12
weeks
Weeks
13- 24
During
follow
up
First 12
weeks
Weeks
13-24
Weeks
25 - 48
During
follow
up
Withdrawn for AE2 2 0 3 4 4 1
(Died)
Withdrawn patient
request/lost to
follow up
0 0 1 2 2 3 4
Withdrawn for lack
of efficacy (viral
load increase >1 log
on therapy)
0 2 0 0 0 1 0
Total withdrawals2 4 1 5 6 8 5
1 death, 4 SAEs in first 12 weeks (4% SAE)
Shoeb et al STEPS Study J Hep 2014
12/12/2014
14
The ‘Old Drugs’
• Very hard to use in patients with cirrhosis
• High failure rate
• High serious adverse event rates
The New Drugs
• How do they behave in cirrhosis?
• The pivotal clinical trials had relatively few
patients with cirrhosis
12/12/2014
15
An Integrated Safety and Efficacy Analysis of >500 Patients
with Compensated Cirrhosis Treated with LDV/SOF±RBV
• 513 patients with HCV GT 1, compensated cirrhosis
• Pooled data from Phase 2 and 3 LDV/SOF ± RBV studies
– LONESTAR, ELECTRON, ELECTRON-2, Japan phase 3 study, ION-1, ION-2, SIRIUS
• Primary efficacy endpoint: SVR12
Wk 0 Wk 12 Wk 36Wk 24
SVR12LDV/SOF
SVR12LDV/SOF + RBV
SVR12LDV/SOF + RBV
SVR12LDV/SOF
n=118
n=204
n=133
n=58
Bourliere, AASLD, 2014, Oral #82
SV
R1
2 (
%)
305/322 188/191
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
LDV/SOF ± RBV, N=513
Results: SVR12 by Treatment Duration
SVR rates were similar with 12 or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF ± RBV
Bourliere, AASLD, 2014, Oral #82
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
12/12/2014
16
Overall SVR12
Duration12 wk
24 wk
RegimenLDV/SOF
LDV/SOF + RBV
Duration/±
RBV
LDV/SOF 12 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk
LDV/SOF 24 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 24 wk
Results: SVR12 by Treatment Regimen
Among TE cirrhotic patients, 12 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV resulted in similar SVR rates to 24 weeks of LDV/SOF alone
Bourliere, AASLD, 2014, Oral #82
98%
97%
99%
96%
99%
96%
98%
97%
100%
Treatment Naïve
95%
94%
98%
95%
96%
90%
96%
98%
100%
Treatment Experienced
Overall SVR12
Duration
12 wk
24 wk
Regimen
LDV/SOF
LDV/SOF + RBV
Duration/±
RBV
LDV/SOF 12 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk
LDV/SOF 24 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 24 wk
98%
97%
99%
96%
99%
96%
98%
97%
100%
Treatment Naïve
95%
94%
98%
95%
96%
90%
96%
98%
100%
Treatment Experienced
Overall SVR12
Duration12 wk
24 wk
RegimenLDV/SOF
LDV/SOF + RBV
Duration/±
RBV
LDV/SOF 12 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk
LDV/SOF 24 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 24 wk
Results: SVR12 by Treatment Regimen
Among TE cirrhotic patients, 12 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV resulted in similar SVR rates to 24 weeks of LDV/SOF alone
Bourliere, AASLD, 2014, Oral #82
98%
97%
99%
96%
99%
96%
98%
97%
100%
Treatment Naïve
95%
94%
98%
95%
96%
90%
96%
98%
100%
Treatment Experienced
Overall SVR12
Duration
12 wk
24 wk
RegimenLDV/SOF
LDV/SOF + RBV
Duration/±
RBV
LDV/SOF 12 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk
LDV/SOF 24 wk
LDV/SOF + RBV 24 wk
98%
97%
99%
96%
99%
96%
98%
97%
100%
Treatment Naïve
95%
94%
98%
95%
96%
90%
96%
98%
100%
Treatment Experienced
12/12/2014
17
TURQUOISE-II: GT1 treatment-naive and
experienced cirrhotic patients
• ABT-450/r/ABT-267 (ombitasvir) + ABT-333 (dasabuvir) + RBV for 12 or 24 weeks
• ABT-450/r/ombitasvir = 150/100 mg/25 mg QD co-formulated;• dasabuvir = 250 mg BID; RBV = weight-based BID. • Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
ABT-450/r /ombitasvir + dasabuvir + RBV
0 2412
Study weeks
n=208
n=172ABT-450/r /ombitasvir + dasabuvir + RBV
HCV GT1, treatment-naive or -experienced,
cirrhotic(N=380)
TURQUOISE-II: GT1 treatment-naive and experienced
cirrhotic patients – baseline characteristics
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
12-Week Arm
(N=208)
24-Week Arm
(N=172)
Male (%) 70.2 70.3
White race (%) 95.7 93.6
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (%) 12.0 11.6
Mean age (years) 57.1 56.5
Mean BMI (kg/m2) 27.9 27.9
IL28B non-CC (%) 83.2 80.2
HCV genotype 1a (%) 67.3 70.3
Treatment-naïve (%) 41.3 43.0
Treatment-experienced (%) 58.7 57.0
Relapse 13.9 13.4
Partial responder 8.7 7.6
Null responder 36.1 36.0
Platelet count <100 x 109/L (%) 21.6 19.2
Serum albumin <3.5 g/dL (%) 12.0 10.5
Child-Pugh score >5 (%) 18.3 18.6
3D + RBV
12/12/2014
18
TURQUOISE-II: GT1 treatment-naive and experienced
cirrhotic patients – baseline characteristics
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
12-Week Arm
(N=208)
24-Week Arm
(N=172)
Male (%) 70.2 70.3
White race (%) 95.7 93.6
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (%) 12.0 11.6
Mean age (years) 57.1 56.5
Mean BMI (kg/m2) 27.9 27.9
IL28B non-CC (%) 83.2 80.2
HCV genotype 1a (%) 67.3 70.3
Treatment-naïve (%) 41.3 43.0
Treatment-experienced (%) 58.7 57.0
Relapse 13.9 13.4
Partial responder 8.7 7.6
Null responder 36.1 36.0
Platelet count <100 x 109/L (%) 21.6 19.2
Serum albumin <3.5 g/dL (%) 12.0 10.5
Child-Pugh score >5 (%) 18.3 18.6
3D + RBV
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 rates in GT1 treatment-naive and
experienced cirrhotic patients
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
0
20
40
60
80
100
SV
R1
2,
% P
ati
en
ts
12 Weeks3D + RBV
91.8
191208
95.9
165172
24 Weeks3D + RBV
P=0.089
12/12/2014
19
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 rates in GT1 treatment-naive and
experienced cirrhotic patients by HCV genotype
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
0
20
40
60
80
10088.6
12-week arm
24-week arm
98.594.2 100
GT1a GT1b
3D + RBV
SV
R1
2,
% P
ati
en
ts
124140
6768
114121
5151
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 rates in GT1a treatment-naive and
experienced cirrhotic patients by prior treatment response
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
0
20
40
60
80
10092.2
12-week arm
24-week arm
92.9
Naive Prior RelapseResponse
3D + RBV
SV
R1
2,
% P
ati
en
ts
5964
1415
5256
1313
93.3 100 100 100 80.0 92.9
1111
4050
1010
3942
Prior PartialResponse
Prior NullResponse
HCV Subtype 1a
12/12/2014
20
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 rates in GT1b treatment-naive and
experienced cirrhotic patients by prior treatment response
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
0
20
40
60
80
100100
12-week arm
24-week arm
100
Naive Prior RelapseResponse
3D + RBV
SV
R1
2,
% P
ati
en
ts
2222
2525
1818
2020
100 100 85.7 100 100 100
67
1414
33
1010
Prior PartialResponse
Prior NullResponse
HCV Subtype 1b
TURQUOISE-II: safety summary in GT1 treatment-naive
and experienced cirrhotic patients
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
Hepatic decompensation events were rare (4 patients, 1.1%)
• None were considered related to study drug
Event, %
12-Week Arm
(N=208)
24-Week Arm
(N=172)
Any AE 91.8 90.7
Severe AE 6.7 7.6
Serious AE 6.3 4.7
AE leading to drug discontinuation 1.9 2.3
Death* 0 0
3D + RBV
*1 patient with a non-treatment emergent death (occurring 80 days after last dose of study treatment), not attributed to 3D or RBV.
12/12/2014
21
TURQUOISE-II: laboratory assessments in GT1 treatment-naive
and experienced cirrhotic patients
• Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med 2014. Online DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1402869.
ALT elevation
• Asymptomatic, transient, and improved or resolved with ongoing study drug dosing
Bilirubin elevation
• Transient, predominantly indirect, no discontinuations due to hyperbilirubinemia
Hemoglobin decrease
• Managed with reduction of ribavirin dose in 34 patients (8.9%)
12-Week Arm
(N=208)
24-Week Arm
(N=172)
ALT >5x ULN (%) 2.9 0
Total bilirubin >3x ULN (%) 13.5 5.2
Hemoglobin (%)
<10 g/dL 7.2 11.0
<8.0 g/dL 1.4 0.6
3D + RBV
LDV/SOF + RBV for HCV Patients with
Decompensated Cirrhosis
• 108 patients randomized 1:1 to 12 or 24 weeks of treatment
• Stratified by CTP class B [7-9] or C [score 10–12]*
• Broad inclusion criteria:
– No history of major organ transplant, including liver
– No hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
– Total bilirubin ≤10 mg/dL, Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
– CrCl≥ 40 mL/min, Platelets > 30,000
• RBV dosing: dose escalation, 600–1200 mg/d
Prospective, multicenter study of 12 or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV in TN and TE HCV GT 1 and 4 patients with CTP B (N=59) or CTP C (N=49) clinically decompensated cirrhosis
Wk 0 Wk 12 Wk 36Wk 24
SVR12N=53
SVR12N=55 LDV/SOF + RBV
LDV/SOF + RBV
*Patients with CTP scores 13-15 were excludedFlamm, AASLD, 2014, Oral #239
12/12/2014
22
Demographics• SOLAR-1: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated Cirrhosis
CTP B CTP C
12 Weeks
n=30
24 Weeks
n=29
12 Weeks
n=23
24 Weeks
n=26
Median age, y (range) 60 (28-69) 58 (35-69) 58 (41-71) 59 (48-68)
Male, n (%) 22 (73) 18 (62) 14 (61) 18 (69)
White, n (%) 29 (97) 26 (90) 21 (91) 24 (92)
BMI ≥30 kg/m2, n (%) 10 (33) 10 (34) 13 (57) 9 (35)
Mean HCV RNA, log10
IU/mL (range) 5.9
(4.3-6.7)
5.8
(3.2-7.1)
5.6
(4.1-6.5)
5.8
(3.7-6.9)
GT 1a, n (%) 19 (63) 22 (76) 15 (65) 18 (69)
IL28B non-CC, n (%) 26 (87) 23/28 (82) 17 (74) 19 (73)
Prior HCV treatment, n (%) 22 (73) 19 (66) 11 (48) 18 (69)
MELD score, n (%)
<10 6 (20) 8 (28) 0 0
10‒15 21 (70) 16 (55) 16 (70) 13 (50)
16-20 3 (10) 5 (17) 7 (30) 12 (46)
21-25 0 0 0 1 (4)
Ascites, n (%) 17 (57) 17 (59) 22 (96) 25 (96)
Encephalopathy, n (%) 20 (67) 16 (55) 21 (91) 23 (88)Flamm, AASLD, 2014, Oral #239
Demographics• SOLAR-1: LDV/SOF + RBV in Decompensated Cirrhosis
CTP B CTP C
12 Weeks
n=30
24 Weeks
n=29
12 Weeks
n=23
24 Weeks
n=26
Median age, y (range) 60 (28-69) 58 (35-69) 58 (41-71) 59 (48-68)
Male, n (%) 22 (73) 18 (62) 14 (61) 18 (69)
White, n (%) 29 (97) 26 (90) 21 (91) 24 (92)
BMI ≥30 kg/m2, n (%) 10 (33) 10 (34) 13 (57) 9 (35)
Mean HCV RNA, log10
IU/mL (range) 5.9
(4.3-6.7)
5.8
(3.2-7.1)
5.6
(4.1-6.5)
5.8
(3.7-6.9)
GT 1a, n (%) 19 (63) 22 (76) 15 (65) 18 (69)
IL28B non-CC, n (%) 26 (87) 23/28 (82) 17 (74) 19 (73)
Prior HCV treatment, n (%) 22 (73) 19 (66) 11 (48) 18 (69)
MELD score, n (%)
<10 6 (20) 8 (28) 0 0
10‒15 21 (70) 16 (55) 16 (70) 13 (50)
16-20 3 (10) 5 (17) 7 (30) 12 (46)
21-25 0 0 0 1 (4)
Ascites, n (%) 17 (57) 17 (59) 22 (96) 25 (96)
Encephalopathy, n (%) 20 (67) 16 (55) 21 (91) 23 (88)Flamm, AASLD, 2014, Oral #239
12/12/2014
23
Results: SVR12
CTP B CTP C
SV
R1
2 (
%)
26/30 19/22 18/2024/27
Error bars represent 90% confidence intervals.
LDV/SOF + RBV 12 Weeks LDV/SOF + RBV 24 Weeks
SVR rates were similar with 12 or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV
Flamm, AASLD, 2014, Oral #239
MELD Scores Change From Baseline to
Follow-Up Week 4
46
n=5 n=5 n=2 n=3
(-8)
(+10)
CPT B CPT C
12 wk (n=30)* 24 wk (n=29)* 12 wk (n=23)* 24 wk (n=26)*
*Missing FU-4: n=2 CPT B 12 wk; n=4 CPT B 24 wk; n=2 CPT C 12 wk; n=7 CPT C 24 wk.
Flamm, AASLD, 2014, Oral #239
12/12/2014
24
Solar 1
• The Lazarus Trial
• Persuades me to treat decompensated
cirrhosis
The UK EAP
• Patients with decompensated cirrhosis offered
sofosbuvir + ledipasvir or daclatasvir + RBV
• Over 700 patients on therapy to-date
• Early results from first 250 patients – 8
relapsers
12/12/2014
25
End stage liver disease
• We will see more and more patients with
advanced liver disease
• We need to monitor
• Medication
• Portal Pressure
• HCC
• We need to treat with interferon free regime
in partnership
with