prof. dr. d. krömker, christian dehmel slide 1 plug and pull - energy saving in private households:...
TRANSCRIPT
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 1
Plug and Pull - Energy Saving in Private Households: Results from a
German Study
TRANSPOSE mid-term conference,November 2009 Münster
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 2
Research question and design
• Which factors influence energy conservation behaviour in households from the perspective of environmental psychology?
• 4 behavioural areas with high energy saving potential – Replacement of fridges– Replacement of TVs– Switching electronic devices off regularly– Replacement of electric heating systems
+ general electricity consumption patterns
• Phone survey (N=1000) + 125 participants in extra survey about electric heating systems
– Questions operationalized on basis of a behavioural model (OSA Heuristic)– Regression analysis and analysis of variance
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 3
OSA-Model
subject related variables:self-concept: - materialism - frugality - innovation - natur/environment
object related variables•Problem awareness
actionale variables:attitudespersonal norm subjective social norm self-efficacycontrol
emotions
intention/behaviour
context context
occasions
habits
beliefs:- neg./pos. consequences
- efficacy
perceived behaviouralcontrol
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 4
Results A: General electricity consumption• Dependent Variable: Electricity-efficient behaviour, index from 16 Items e.g. use of energy efficient bulbs, cooking never
without a lid, washing at low temperature scores on 5-point scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree)
• High rate of electricity saving behaviour (M=4,14; SD=0,58)
Belief: complex and costly
Self-concept: frugal
Social context
Self-concept: natur/environment
Personal Norm
Control: feasability
Self-concept: materialism
Self-efficacy
Sex female vs. male
High school graduation high vs. low
-.158-.158
.151.151
.125.125
.115.115
.109.109
Electricity-efficient
behaviour : R²= .31-.077-.077
-.095-.095
.077.077
-.133-.133
.070.070
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 5
Results A: Intention to save electricity
• Dependent Variable: Intention to reduce energy consumption in the future scores on 5-point scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree)
• 51% high intention, 20% undeceided, 29% no intention (M=2,62; SD=1,49)
Control: Savings are possible
Personal Norm
Belief: others will not join in
Self-efficacy
Problem awareness: I´m concerned about climate change
.205.205
.116.116
.090.090Intention to
save electricity: R²= .10
.088.088
.096.096
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 6
Results B: switching electronic devices off
• Dependent Variable: Switching electronic devices off by pulling plugs or using connection plug boards scores on 5-point scale (1= never to 5=always)
• 74% switch off always or often, 16% sometimes, 10% rarely or never
Habit to leave devices connected
Belief: less convenience
Self-concept: innovative
Self-efficacy
-.588-.588
-.233-.233
.148.148
Switching electronic
devices off : R²= .59.094.094
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 7
Results B: Intentions to pull plugs
• No systematic relation between the dependent variable „ intention to pull more plugs or use connection plug boards in the future” and predictors
• Dependent Variable: Intention that new devices will be energy-efficient ones scores on 5-point scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree)
• 89% agree, 16% undecided, 3% disagree
Self-concept: frugal
Self-efficacy
Emotion: it´s fun to find hidden energy consuming devicesSelf-concept: natur/environment
.275.275
.227.227
.147.147
Intention to buy efficient
devices: R²= .32.163.163
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 8
Results C: Replacement of fridges
• Dependent Variable: Annual energy consumption of all fridges in kWh per year• Over 70% use more than 400 kWh p. year (A++: fridge 150l (133kWh), fridge/freezer 300l (182))
• Only 14% want to buy an energy-efficient fridge in the near futur– Those who want to buy one, are more likly to be: innovativ, in control of energy consumption, antizipate barriers in their
households
• But 94% say that the next firdge will be an energy-efficient one– Those who want to buy one the next time, are more likly to : feel that climate protection is effective and report a strong
influence of their houshold members
Occasion: Needed another fridge
Residence size
Own house or flat vs. rent
Professional education medium vs. high
.261.261
.257.257
-.207-.207
Energy consumption of
all fridges: R²= .31-.216-.216
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 9
Results D: Replacement of TVs
• Dependent Variable: Energy consumption of all TVs in Watt• Almost 70% use more than 150 Watt, 20% use more than 250 Watt (average older CRT-TV: 75 to
150 Watt)
• Only 6% want to buy an energy-efficient TV in the near futur– No systematic differences between people with high or low intention
• But 82% say that the next TV will be an energy-efficient one– Positive influence: ecological self-concept, personal norm to buy an efficient one, living in bigger residences– Barriers: no energy-effiecient TVs availabe in store and high income compared to medium income
Occasion: Needed another TV
Self-concept: materialsm
Occasion: special offer
Income: medium vs. high
.323.323
.186.186
.164.164
Energy consumption of
all TVs: R²= .25.179.179
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 10
Results E: Replacement of electric heating systems • Only 6% of all participants (N=125, all owning their residences) want to replace their electric
heating system in the near future• Persons with a moral obligation to replace their electric heating system are more likly to do so
• Group comparison (univariate analysis of variance): People, who decided to replace their heating system :
– Are younger– Have a higher income– Think other heating systems are cheaper over time– Feel guilty about not doing more to protect the environmnet– Think they can afford the replacement at the moment– Think the investment will pay off– Think not it is the next generations business
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 11
Resume
• Manifold predictors influence intention and behaviour • Always different sets of predicitors influence the various
intentions and behaviours• Good levels of explained variance (25% to 59%), except for most
intentions• „General electricity consumption“ and „switching electronic
devices off“ influenced mainly by predictors from the OSA-Modell
• Electricity consumption by fridges and TVs influenced mainly by beneficial occasions and socio-demographic factors
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 12
Implications and energy saving potential• General electricity consumption:
• Communicative strategies can adress influencal factors and support behavioral changes• The strategies should consider the social processes important for behavioural change and therefore
could, for instance, be applied by local or regional actors such as consumer advice centres
• Switching electronic devices off: • Habits and anticipated loss of comfort hard to adress, though possible with communicative strategies
as mentioned above • Focus on technical solutions (e.g. less stand-by losses)
• Electric heating systems:• Replacement must be cost efficient, but also moral responsibility important• At the moment it´s not cost-efficient ot replace electric heating systems in small houses in Germany• Communicative strategies to adress responsibility and financial incentives to foster replacement
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 13
Implications and energy saving potential• Fridges:
• ecological and economical reasonable to exchange devices older than 5 years• Two big fridges (300l) A++ need less than 400 kWh per year: 70% of the sample
use moreHigh energy saving potential through exchange• High motivation to buy energy-efficient fridges• Communicative strategies to support exchange of fridges soon• Bonus programs could stimulate exchange
• TVs:• 66% of the sample use CRT-TVs, LCD-technology much more efficiant• But: „only“ 50% of the sample use TVs smaller than 70cm screen size• Electricity consumption is not associated with TVs (no labels) and energy-efficient
TVs are not sufficiently visible in stores• Howerver, bonus programs may be ineffective without energy labels and
communicative strategies to raise awareness applied at the same time
Prof. Dr. D. Krömker, Christian Dehmel Slide 14
ContactDörthe Krömker, University of Kassel, [email protected]
Christian Dehmel, University of Muenster, [email protected]